Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #555135 > unrolled thread

Is there a God, Yes or No?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 15:14 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 17:23 -0600
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 03:38 -0500
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 11:35 -0800
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 13:42 -0600
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2016-02-22 08:01 -0600
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:29 +0800
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-02-24 10:06 +1100
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Neac <gnn.net> - 2016-02-23 22:26 +0000
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-25 18:28 -0500
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-22 06:18 -0800
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 08:56 -0600
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-22 07:32 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-02-20 15:26 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-21 00:47 +0000
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 17:04 -0800
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-21 12:38 +0000
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Norm X" <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2016-02-20 18:45 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Norm X" <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2016-02-20 19:13 -0800
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 20:28 -0800
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-02-26 12:50 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-21 03:42 -0500
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 11:32 -0800
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 12:41 -0800
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 20:20 -0800
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:27 +0800
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-28 20:08 -0800
                [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:15 +0800
                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 11:04 -0800
                    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-29 23:52 +0000
                    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:55 +0800
                      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-01 14:11 -0800
                        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 21:45 +0800
                          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:27 -0800
                            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 18:34 -0800
                              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-03 00:40 -0800
                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-05 10:38 -0600
                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-05 09:33 -0800
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-23 14:12 -0800
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-23 15:49 -0500
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:33 +0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-02-22 09:09 -0500
    Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 06:27 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 11:15 -0800
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 14:10 -0600
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 15:43 -0500
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 11:46 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-02-22 14:41 -0800
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 19:54 -0500
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-22 20:19 -0800
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 00:10 -0500
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-22 21:48 -0800
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-22 22:19 -0800
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 09:11 -0500
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-23 17:09 -0800
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 14:47 -0800
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 21:38 -0500
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 21:45 -0500
                Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 03:00 -0800
                  Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 06:08 -0500
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-23 03:33 +0000
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-22 20:21 -0800
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-23 18:20 +0000
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-02-23 12:43 -0600
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Rock Brentwood <federation2005@netzero.com> - 2016-02-23 17:52 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 12:56 +1100
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-24 00:04 -0800
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 23:03 +1100
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-02-24 13:12 +0100
          Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 11:30 +1100
            WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-02 17:18 -0800
              Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 20:18 -0700
                WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-02 19:54 -0800
                  Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 23:36 -0800
                Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-03 23:21 +0100
                  Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 14:47 -0700
              Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-03-02 23:14 -0700
                Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 10:52 -0700
              Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 18:45 +1100
              Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Joy Beeson <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> - 2016-03-03 22:29 -0400
                Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-03-04 13:44 -0800
            Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-03-02 23:56 -0500
              Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 18:46 +1100
                Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-03-03 19:55 -0500
                  Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-05 04:46 +0100
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-24 04:18 -0600
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 23:03 +1100
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:53 -0600
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-28 23:33 +1100
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 13:34 -0800
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 21:23 +0800
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-24 23:34 +0000
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 18:40 +0800
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:56 -0600
                Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:58 +0800
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:55 -0600
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:59 +0800
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 08:56 -0800
                Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:46 +0800
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-26 14:16 -0600
                Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 12:25 -0800
                  Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-26 23:21 -0600
                Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 22:02 -0800
                  Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-27 08:07 -0800
                    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-27 10:02 -0800
                Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:38 +0800
                  Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 12:00 -0500
                    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 23:55 +0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? sanjeeb guru <guru.sanjeeb@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 22:11 -0800
    Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 04:17 -0800
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 10:53 -0500
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 02:39 -0800
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 06:59 -0500
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 04:10 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 20:14 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-01 21:19 -0800
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 11:33 +1100

Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]

#556986

bilgat@m.nu wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:59:14 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
> <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >On 2/25/2016 10:55 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote:
> >> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:23:41 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
> >>>
> >>> Are you bullying? :)
> >>>
> >>
> >> I don't talk about fairies, I only counter and crap that I see that
> >> suggest that fairies may be real
> >>
> >
> >Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :)
> 
> Nope, not even. They are the exact same thing. they both require the
> same thing, and that is for an ignorant, usually uneducated, mentally
> ill, person to believe that fantasy and supernatural are real, if you
> believe in either of the two you must believe that both exist.


I don't know what you're talking about....
I live in Los Angeles, California..
on Santa Monica Blvd there are lots of fairies!

I also understand there are a lot of fairies living in San Francisco...

fairies come from all over...


I won't be surprised if there are a few fairies here somewhere lurking in these newsgroups.


You might even be a fairy...God knows.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557140

On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:25:08 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>bilgat@m.nu wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:59:14 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
>> <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> >On 2/25/2016 10:55 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:23:41 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
>> >>>
>> >>> Are you bullying? :)
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> I don't talk about fairies, I only counter and crap that I see that
>> >> suggest that fairies may be real
>> >>
>> >
>> >Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :)
>> 
>> Nope, not even. They are the exact same thing. they both require the
>> same thing, and that is for an ignorant, usually uneducated, mentally
>> ill, person to believe that fantasy and supernatural are real, if you
>> believe in either of the two you must believe that both exist.
>
>
>I don't know what you're talking about....
>I live in Los Angeles, California..
>on Santa Monica Blvd there are lots of fairies!
>
>I also understand there are a lot of fairies living in San Francisco...
>
>fairies come from all over...
>
>
>I won't be surprised if there are a few fairies here somewhere lurking in these newsgroups.
>
>
>You might even be a fairy...God knows.


oh ok good now I know who all the idiot fucking sock puppets are, Now
I can ignore all of them. that shouold mean something to you, the
reason you have so many different sock puppets is because you dont get
enough attention with one name, let that be a clue, you are a moron
and noone likes you

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557146

Robert Carnegie wrote:
> 
> On Friday, 26 February 2016 20:16:53 UTC, bil...@m.nu  wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:59:14 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
> > <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >On 2/25/2016 10:55 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:23:41 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
> > >>>
> > >>> Are you bullying? :)
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> I don't talk about fairies, I only counter and crap that I see that
> > >> suggest that fairies may be real
> > >>
> > >
> > >Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :)
> >
> > Nope, not even. They are the exact same thing. they both require the
> > same thing, and that is for an ignorant, usually uneducated, mentally
> > ill, person to believe that fantasy and supernatural are real, if you
> > believe in either of the two you must believe that both exist.
> 
> My impression is that gods usually want more of your
> attention than fairies do.  And aren't local.  Your
> neighbourhood fairy probably just wants to be allowed
> to interfere with your livestock (if they're the kind
> that do that).

Now, wait a minute here...

if you look at images of faires
it's usually a creature with wings.

It's something that flies in the sky.

There are Atheist that believe in Flying Saucers.

Flying Saucers are simply an updated version of a ...fairy.

Flying Saucers are modern day fairies.


People in the old days believed it fairies...
they replaced faries with flying saucers.

Since there are atheist who believe in flying saucers...it's the exact same thing
as believing in...fairies.

Flying saucers are aliens who travel in a spaceship from another planet.

If you believe in aliens from another planet, then you believe in fairies.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557228

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Robert Carnegie wrote:
> >
> > On Friday, 26 February 2016 20:16:53 UTC, bil...@m.nu  wrote:
> > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:59:14 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
> > > <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >On 2/25/2016 10:55 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote:
> > > >> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:23:41 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Are you bullying? :)
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> I don't talk about fairies, I only counter and crap that I see that
> > > >> suggest that fairies may be real
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :)
> > >
> > > Nope, not even. They are the exact same thing. they both require the
> > > same thing, and that is for an ignorant, usually uneducated, mentally
> > > ill, person to believe that fantasy and supernatural are real, if you
> > > believe in either of the two you must believe that both exist.
> >
> > My impression is that gods usually want more of your
> > attention than fairies do.  And aren't local.  Your
> > neighbourhood fairy probably just wants to be allowed
> > to interfere with your livestock (if they're the kind
> > that do that).
> 
> Now, wait a minute here...
> 
> if you look at images of faires
> it's usually a creature with wings.
> 
> It's something that flies in the sky.
> 
> There are Atheist that believe in Flying Saucers.
> 
> Flying Saucers are simply an updated version of a ...fairy.
> 
> Flying Saucers are modern day fairies.
> 
> People in the old days believed it fairies...
> they replaced faries with flying saucers.
> 
> Since there are atheist who believe in flying saucers...it's the exact same thing
> as believing in...fairies.
> 
> Flying saucers are aliens who travel in a spaceship from another planet.
> 
> If you believe in aliens from another planet, then you believe in fairies.


Cause faries and aliens from other planets are just made up things flying around in the sky.


That means, if you ask all Atheist "Are We Alone?" they will all answer Yes, right?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557268

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Robert Carnegie wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday, 26 February 2016 20:16:53 UTC, bil...@m.nu  wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:59:14 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
> > > > <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >On 2/25/2016 10:55 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote:
> > > > >> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:23:41 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Are you bullying? :)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I don't talk about fairies, I only counter and crap that I see that
> > > > >> suggest that fairies may be real
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :)
> > > >
> > > > Nope, not even. They are the exact same thing. they both require the
> > > > same thing, and that is for an ignorant, usually uneducated, mentally
> > > > ill, person to believe that fantasy and supernatural are real, if you
> > > > believe in either of the two you must believe that both exist.
> > >
> > > My impression is that gods usually want more of your
> > > attention than fairies do.  And aren't local.  Your
> > > neighbourhood fairy probably just wants to be allowed
> > > to interfere with your livestock (if they're the kind
> > > that do that).
> >
> > Now, wait a minute here...
> >
> > if you look at images of faires
> > it's usually a creature with wings.
> >
> > It's something that flies in the sky.
> >
> > There are Atheist that believe in Flying Saucers.
> >
> > Flying Saucers are simply an updated version of a ...fairy.
> >
> > Flying Saucers are modern day fairies.
> >
> > People in the old days believed it fairies...
> > they replaced faries with flying saucers.
> >
> > Since there are atheist who believe in flying saucers...it's the exact same thing
> > as believing in...fairies.
> >
> > Flying saucers are aliens who travel in a spaceship from another planet.
> >
> > If you believe in aliens from another planet, then you believe in fairies.
> 
> Cause faries and aliens from other planets are just made up things flying around in the sky.
> 
> That means, if you ask all Atheist "Are We Alone?" they will all answer Yes, right?


Now, wait a minute...


the majority of people in the
'scientific community' are in fact...Atheist.

And they believe in aliens from another planet exist somewhere...flying around maybe in a flying saucer.


Yet, none exist.

People in the old days
believed in flying gods..

then a few thousand years
pass by and they believed in
flying fairies and 
flying witches on a broom stick.

That fairy and witch was replaced in the 50's
with ...flying saucers.

So, Atheist believe in Fairies.


End of story!



Fin.



Kaput.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557215

On 2/27/2016 4:16 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote:
>>
>> Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :)
>
> Nope, not even. They are the exact same thing. they both require the
> same thing, and that is for an ignorant, usually uneducated, mentally
> ill, person to believe that fantasy and supernatural are real, if you
> believe in either of the two you must believe that both exist.
>

I can only say they are of different classes of power and statues.

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23)  Linux 4.3.5-300.fc23.x86_64
   ^ ^   23:33:01 up 10 days 14:31 0 users load average: 1.00 1.01 1.05
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557244

In article <nasfn6$h5p$1@dont-email.me>, toylet.toylet@gmail.com says...
> 
> On 2/27/2016 4:16 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote:
> >>
> >> Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :)
> >
> > Nope, not even. They are the exact same thing. they both require the
> > same thing, and that is for an ignorant, usually uneducated, mentally
> > ill, person to believe that fantasy and supernatural are real, if you
> > believe in either of the two you must believe that both exist.
> >
> 
> I can only say they are of different classes of power and statues.

This is true--statues of gods tend to be ancient artifacts of great 
value, statues of fairies tend to be Disney souvenirs.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558580

On 2/28/2016 1:00 AM, J. Clarke wrote:
>
> This is true--statues of gods tend to be ancient artifacts of great
> value, statues of fairies tend to be Disney souvenirs.
>

God is about hope, not miseries! :)

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23)  Linux 4.4.2-301.fc23.x86_64
   ^ ^   00:03:01 up 1 day 1:18 0 users load average: 1.01 1.03 1.05
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556144

Goodness in someone's heart is God.
Trying to understand the Universe has led us and baffled so many people about the presence of lot of things, be it multiverse, or to say parallel universe, more than three dimensions etc.
For example if we say that there is more than three usual dimensions that we observe, that could make things more complicated to understand. What we can know is that if that is true, there could be things more superior than our current understanding about the laws of nature. 
And regarding God, I always feel that if we are good at heart, help each other and the society, God does exists. else not :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556468

As an American, it is my birthright to reject ANY monarchy. Our forefathers fought and died to create a state with no ruler. They believed that the power of government is always derived from the governed. 

God has no place in our government.

We were also founded in the principle that people can think whatever insane thoughts they want add long as it doesn't interfere with other's.

So go ahead and believe whatever foolishness you desire. Pray to a ham sandwich for all I care.

Just be thankful that you live in the West and have the freedom to pray to that ham sandwich.

PS- If you pray to a ham and cheese sandwich, we will burn you alive for heresy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556531

On 02/25/2016 07:17 AM, HVAC wrote:
> As an American, it is my birthright to reject ANY monarchy. Our forefathers fought and died to create a state with no ruler. They believed that the power of government is always derived from the governed.
>
> God has no place in our government.
>
> We were also founded in the principle that people can think whatever insane thoughts they want add long as it doesn't interfere with other's.
>
> So go ahead and believe whatever foolishness you desire. Pray to a ham sandwich for all I care.
>
> Just be thankful that you live in the West and have the freedom to pray to that ham sandwich.
>
> PS- If you pray to a ham and cheese sandwich, we will burn you alive for heresy

What you say about forefathers is true. Too bad you and your pals don't 
accept it and are trying to change back to monarchy (political freedom 
and all that). Hey, Obama says the constitution is a LIVING document and 
in modern times means only what he says it means.

The idea, son, is that government shall not establish a state religion 
and start dictating or even trying to influence what people practice or 
believe. In other words, paying you to promote their animal atheism 
religion is completely against the law. And your attempts to make 
everyone believe in your kooky ideas is also against the law unless you 
are really retired and do not speak for the overlords. (which I doubt)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556809

BJ quacked
What you say about forefathers is true. 
---------------

Oh good. I'm glad you agree. That is my primary goal. To post words that YOU agree with




Too bad you and your pals don't 
accept it and are trying to change back to monarchy (political freedom 
and all that). 
--------------

While you may have agreed. You are too simple minded to see beyond mere words. The monarchy I was speaking of is your god. People bow, scrape and kneel before your god to gain favor. Just as they used to with a king. 

Fuck that.

Americans have no want nor need of any god/kings. We threw off that yolk of oppression long ago. I don't want to go back to that age.

I would rather die on my feet than live on my knees






Hey, Obama says the constitution is a LIVING document and 
in modern times means only what he says it means. 

The idea, son, is that government shall not establish a state religion 
and start dictating or even trying to influence what people practice or 
believe. In other words, paying you to promote their animal atheism 
religion is completely against the law. And your attempts to make 
everyone believe in your kooky ideas is also against the law unless you 
are really retired and do not speak for the overlords. (which I doubt) 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556820

On 02/26/2016 05:39 AM, HVAC wrote:
> BJ quacked
> What you say about forefathers is true.
> ---------------
>
> Oh good. I'm glad you agree. That is my primary goal. To post words that YOU agree with
>
>
>
>
> Too bad you and your pals don't
> accept it and are trying to change back to monarchy (political freedom
> and all that).
> --------------
>
> While you may have agreed. You are too simple minded to see beyond mere words. The monarchy I was speaking of is your god. People bow, scrape and kneel before your god to gain favor. Just as they used to with a king.
>
> Fuck that.
>
> Americans have no want nor need of any god/kings. We threw off that yolk of oppression long ago. I don't want to go back to that age.
>
> I would rather die on my feet than live on my knees

Bullshit. You worship rule by your "overlords". You LOVE the idea of 
being "emperor of everyone" where your mere WORD is law. Just point to 
someone and say "kill him"!  and it's done!  Too bad chances of you 
being anything other than a slave to those in power that you worship is 
ZERO.

You are such a sad case.


-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556822

BJ quacked
> 
> I would rather die on my feet than live on my knees 

Bullshit. You worship rule by your "overlords". You LOVE the idea of 
being "emperor of everyone" where your mere WORD is law. Just point to 
someone and say "kill him"!  and it's done!  
---------------

If that were true there would be damn few people left on earth

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557129

alsor@interia.pl wrote:
> 
> W dniu niedziela, 21 lutego 2016 00:14:29 UTC+1 użytkownik The Starmaker napisał:
> > If you ask people
> > "Is there a God, Yes or No?"
> > You either going to get
> > a Yes or No answer.
> >
> > The answer is either Yes or No.
> >
> > But...if you ask God the same question..
> >
> > His answer would be...
> >
> >
> > "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer."
> >
> > God would say, "It's not that black and white..."
> 
> I have more advanced question:
> do you belive the pussy really exist?


if pussy didn't exist, would you be here?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558506

On Sunday, February 21, 2016 at 7:14:30 AM UTC+8, The Starmaker wrote:
> If you ask people
> "Is there a God, Yes or No?"
> You either going to get
> a Yes or No answer.
> 
> The answer is either Yes or No.
> 
> But...if you ask God the same question..
> 
> His answer would be...
> 
> 
> "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer."
> 
> God would say, "It's not that black and white..."

If you believe in God, God is real. If you believe in the big bang, the big bang is real.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558746

On 2/03/2016 4:19 PM, Peter Riedt wrote:
> On Sunday, February 21, 2016 at 7:14:30 AM UTC+8, The Starmaker wrote:
>> If you ask people
>> "Is there a God, Yes or No?"
>> You either going to get
>> a Yes or No answer.
>>
>> The answer is either Yes or No.
>>
>> But...if you ask God the same question..
>>
>> His answer would be...
>>
>>
>> "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer."
>>
>> God would say, "It's not that black and white..."
>
> If you believe in God, God is real. If you believe in the big bang, the big bang is real.
>

That's an unhelpful redefinition of the word "real".

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web