Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #551730 > unrolled thread

meteroite kills man in India

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 10:45 -0800
    Re: meteroite kills man in India Sergio <imvalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-09 12:53 -0600
      Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 11:22 -0800
        Re: meteroite kills man in India HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 15:05 -0800
          Re: meteroite kills man in India Sergio <imvalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-09 19:24 -0600
          Re: meteroite kills man in India benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 21:20 -0500
    Re: meteroite kills man in India Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-10 07:11 +0100
      Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-10 00:09 -0800
        Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-10 00:19 -0800
          Re: meteroite kills man in India "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:27 -0500
            Re: meteroite kills man in India HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 05:00 -0800
            Re: meteroite kills man in India Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 14:01 -0800
          Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-10 08:27 -0800
            Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-10 08:36 -0800
              Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-11 13:06 -0800
                Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-11 14:09 -0800
      Re: meteroite kills man in India Heiðr Einherjar <einherjar@notformail.org> - 2016-02-10 17:09 +0000

#551730 — meteroite kills man in India

How can NASA milk it for all it's got?




maybe sell meteroite blocking lotion...

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#551733

On 2/9/2016 12:45 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
>
>
>
>
> maybe sell meteroite blocking lotion...
>


I think


   it


         was aiming



                         for




Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551750

Sergio wrote:
> 
> On 2/9/2016 12:45 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > maybe sell meteroite blocking lotion...
> >
> 
> I think
> 
>    it
> 
>          was aiming
> 
>                          for
> 
> Starmaker


If there was any..."aiming", it certaintly wasn't the intention of the
meteroite.

Maybe the moon was doing the aiming, and used it's gravitional pull...

to perform a trick shot....


while making it rain on your head.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551870

God really wanted that guy dead

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551895

On 2/9/2016 5:05 PM, HVAC wrote:
> God really wanted that guy dead
>

P. K. Senthil Kumari, the police chief in Vellore district in the 
southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu, told CNN that the object struck the 
grounds of an engineering school at about midday Saturday, making a loud 
noise and leaving an impact crater about 60 cm (2 feet) deep.

The resulting blast killed a 40-year-old named Kamaraj, who worked as a 
bus driver on the campus of the Bharathidasan Engineering College, the 
police chief said. Like many in the state, the victim only used one name.

  Two gardeners and a student at the college were also injured in the 
incident, and are receiving treatment at a hospital in Vellore, he said.

The impact shattered the windows of a number of buses on campus, he said.

Senthil Kumari said it was yet to be confirmed whether the object that 
caused the blast was a meteorite, as opposed to falling space junk or 
some other form of debris.

Police recovered a piece of debris from the collision, which will be 
analyzed by a scientist from the Indian Institute of Astrophysics.

"We wait until the investigation is over to confirm if the object was a 
meteorite," he said.

Tamil Nadu's state government released a statement on the incident 
Sunday, describing it as a meteorite strike and offering 100,000 rupees 
($1471) in compensation to the victim's family.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551897

On 02/09/2016 06:05 PM, HVAC wrote:
> God really wanted that guy dead

Gosh, HVAC, I heard that lightning bolts were his traditional way to 
"off" nuisances.

Oh wait. Lightning isn't repeatable on command and thus is a hoax by 
greedy authors and college kids. Makes sense now.


-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551936

Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
> How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
>


Nasa is not an Indian agency.

Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't involved.

The other question you mentioned is also interesting: what had the 
people of NASA done with all the money (supposed the Moon land was a 
fake)???

>
>
> maybe sell meteroite blocking lotion...

Yes, Nasa should take part in the cosmetic industry and sell super duper 
sun-blockers, too ('Moon tested').

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551956

Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
> > How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
> >
> 
> Nasa is not an Indian agency.
> 
> Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't involved.


You underestimate NASA....


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551958

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Thomas Heger wrote:
> >
> > Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
> > > How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
> > >
> >
> > Nasa is not an Indian agency.
> >
> > Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't involved.
> 
> You underestimate NASA....
> 
> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0


Here is the NASA involved response:

"But NASA scientists in the United States were more emphatic, saying in a public statement that
the photographs posted online were more consistent with “a land based explosion” than with something from space."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0


Now, let me translate it for you...

NASA is saying, 'if we say it's a meteroite, it's a meteroite. If we say it's not
a meteroite, it's not a metorite.' NASA is saying to India, "Go fuck yourself!"

In other words, any rock that falls from space and lands anywhere on Earth, NASA OWNS IT!


The Starmaker



You people never learn, do you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551994

The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
>>>> How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nasa is not an Indian agency.
>>>
>>> Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't
>>> involved.
>>
>> You underestimate NASA....
>>
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
>
>
> Here is the NASA involved response:
>
> "But NASA scientists in the United States were more emphatic, saying in
> a public statement that
> the photographs posted online were more consistent with "a land based
> explosion" than with something from space."
> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
>
>
> Now, let me translate it for you...
>
> NASA is saying, 'if we say it's a meteroite, it's a meteroite. If we
> say it's not
> a meteroite, it's not a metorite.' NASA is saying to India, "Go fuck
> yourself!"
>
> In other words, any rock that falls from space and lands anywhere on
> Earth, NASA OWNS IT!
>
>
> The Starmaker
>
>
>
> You people never learn, do you?





And I'm sure as NASA got involved, and spent another $5 million of US tax 
dollars for the investigation.
(that took them all of 5 minutes)
The yank minions are all waving thier flags and shouting,... USA NUMBER ONE 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551999

Blast said
The yank minions are all waving thier flags and shouting,... USA NUMBER ONE 
---------------

Meanwhile Blast is waving his black ISIS flag to show where his allegiance is. If you are against the USA, Blast is with you.

Ironic, isn't it? The people that Blast supports would throw him from a rooftop and the country he hates allows him to say whatever he wants

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552365

On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 at 7:27:19 AM UTC-5, Bast wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> Thomas Heger wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
> >>>> How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Nasa is not an Indian agency.
> >>>
> >>> Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't
> >>> involved.
> >>
> >> You underestimate NASA....
> >>
> >> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> >
> >
> > Here is the NASA involved response:
> >
> > "But NASA scientists in the United States were more emphatic,
> > saying in a public statement that the photographs posted online
> > were more consistent with "a land based explosion" than with
> > something from space."
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0

We surveill things all, never doubt our youTubes.

> > Now, let me translate it for you...

I do not like your dishonest accent in any Language, or Font. Bring it StarBitch!

> > NASA is saying, 'if we say it's a meteroite, it's a meteroite. If
> > we say it's not a meteroite, it's not a metorite.' NASA is saying
> > to India, "Go fuck yourself!"

Hey StrawFuckerErr... can you learn to use fewer posts to make any point?

> > In other words, any rock that falls from space and lands anywhere
> > on Earth, NASA OWNS IT!

Yes, you didn't know that? NASA of them the great USA owns it all! 
The old why is our oil under Iraq, Iran, or ...youKnow?! WWWHY?!

Even the Universal Ph(y)sics Darkest Matter, the Strangest Universal
Energy (SUE@# me Me ME) is our very owned property. Our Ga(y)est LBGT
Hillary Dudes Trump False Fag Flag is stuck up in their -- faces or
otherwise -- deep! Then The(y)TheThem ask why I don't vote Vote VOTE...

> > The Starmaker
> >
> > You people never learn, do you?

WeThePeeps@# learn you StrawFart love to see your name in lights!

> And I'm sure as NASA got involved, and spent another $$5 million of
> US tax dollars for the investigation.  (that took them all of 5
> minutes) The yank minions are all waving thier flags and
> shouting,... USA NUMBER ONE

Counting The Mone(y), that's very Anti-Capitalistic of you, Bast.

More people in India die daily than are born. Helping the Climate Change.

Wait... wait... WAIT... was it a MuslimIshQ Metorite?! Was it StarPuke?!

Imagine writing onl(y) one line sentences until the end of time...

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: Smells like Maple S(y)rup.”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552013

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Thomas Heger wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
> > > > How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Nasa is not an Indian agency.
> > >
> > > Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't involved.
> >
> > You underestimate NASA....
> >
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> 
> Here is the NASA involved response:
> 
> "But NASA scientists in the United States were more emphatic, saying in a public statement that
> the photographs posted online were more consistent with “a land based explosion” than with something from space."
> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> 
> Now, let me translate it for you...
> 
> NASA is saying, 'if we say it's a meteroite, it's a meteroite. If we say it's not
> a meteroite, it's not a metorite.' NASA is saying to India, "Go fuck yourself!"
> 
> In other words, any rock that falls from space and lands anywhere on Earth, NASA OWNS IT!
> 
> The Starmaker
> 
> You people never learn, do you?


In other words, NASA didn't authorize that meteroite to kill that man in india.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552017

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Thomas Heger wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
> > > > > How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Nasa is not an Indian agency.
> > > >
> > > > Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't involved.
> > >
> > > You underestimate NASA....
> > >
> > > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> >
> > Here is the NASA involved response:
> >
> > "But NASA scientists in the United States were more emphatic, saying in a public statement that
> > the photographs posted online were more consistent with “a land based explosion” than with something from space."
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> >
> > Now, let me translate it for you...
> >
> > NASA is saying, 'if we say it's a meteroite, it's a meteroite. If we say it's not
> > a meteroite, it's not a metorite.' NASA is saying to India, "Go fuck yourself!"
> >
> > In other words, any rock that falls from space and lands anywhere on Earth, NASA OWNS IT!
> >
> > The Starmaker
> >
> > You people never learn, do you?
> 
> In other words, NASA didn't authorize that meteroite to kill that man in india.


In other words...

always keep in mind the conclusions of: Appendix-F.txt

http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs/rogers-commission/Appendix-F.txt





Conclusions


"an attempt to assure the government of NASA perfection and
success in order to ensure the supply of funds."


"perfection and success".


That means, no meteroite can kill a man in India cause NASA is getting paid to prevent it.


So, to "to assure the government of NASA perfection and
success", NASA has no choice but to say, 

that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says


"in order to ensure the supply of funds."




The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552349

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thomas Heger wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
> > > > > > How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Nasa is not an Indian agency.
> > > > >
> > > > > Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't involved.
> > > >
> > > > You underestimate NASA....
> > > >
> > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> > >
> > > Here is the NASA involved response:
> > >
> > > "But NASA scientists in the United States were more emphatic, saying in a public statement that
> > > the photographs posted online were more consistent with “a land based explosion” than with something from space."
> > > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> > >
> > > Now, let me translate it for you...
> > >
> > > NASA is saying, 'if we say it's a meteroite, it's a meteroite. If we say it's not
> > > a meteroite, it's not a metorite.' NASA is saying to India, "Go fuck yourself!"
> > >
> > > In other words, any rock that falls from space and lands anywhere on Earth, NASA OWNS IT!
> > >
> > > The Starmaker
> > >
> > > You people never learn, do you?
> >
> > In other words, NASA didn't authorize that meteroite to kill that man in india.
> 
> In other words...
> 
> always keep in mind the conclusions of: Appendix-F.txt
> 
> http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs/rogers-commission/Appendix-F.txt
> 
> Conclusions
> 
> "an attempt to assure the government of NASA perfection and
> success in order to ensure the supply of funds."
> 
> "perfection and success".
> 
> That means, no meteroite can kill a man in India cause NASA is getting paid to prevent it.
> 
> So, to "to assure the government of NASA perfection and
> success", NASA has no choice but to say,
> 
> that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says
> 
> "in order to ensure the supply of funds."
> 
> The Starmaker


Of course, there doesn't exist in India a scientist that is knowldegable enough to look at it, Right?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552368

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thomas Heger wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
> > > > > > > How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nasa is not an Indian agency.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't involved.
> > > > >
> > > > > You underestimate NASA....
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> > > >
> > > > Here is the NASA involved response:
> > > >
> > > > "But NASA scientists in the United States were more emphatic, saying in a public statement that
> > > > the photographs posted online were more consistent with “a land based explosion” than with something from space."
> > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> > > >
> > > > Now, let me translate it for you...
> > > >
> > > > NASA is saying, 'if we say it's a meteroite, it's a meteroite. If we say it's not
> > > > a meteroite, it's not a metorite.' NASA is saying to India, "Go fuck yourself!"
> > > >
> > > > In other words, any rock that falls from space and lands anywhere on Earth, NASA OWNS IT!
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker
> > > >
> > > > You people never learn, do you?
> > >
> > > In other words, NASA didn't authorize that meteroite to kill that man in india.
> >
> > In other words...
> >
> > always keep in mind the conclusions of: Appendix-F.txt
> >
> > http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs/rogers-commission/Appendix-F.txt
> >
> > Conclusions
> >
> > "an attempt to assure the government of NASA perfection and
> > success in order to ensure the supply of funds."
> >
> > "perfection and success".
> >
> > That means, no meteroite can kill a man in India cause NASA is getting paid to prevent it.
> >
> > So, to "to assure the government of NASA perfection and
> > success", NASA has no choice but to say,
> >
> > that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says
> >
> > "in order to ensure the supply of funds."
> >
> > The Starmaker
> 
> Of course, there doesn't exist in India a scientist that is knowldegable enough to look at it, Right?



Imagine...one of those NASA guys looking at the pictures and he says...

"It looks like a meteorite to me!"

They'll tell him..."YOU'RE FUCKIN FIRED!!!!"


That's the Truth about working at NASA...you disagree, you're fired,
Right?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552025

Il giorno Thomas Heger ha scritto:

> Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
>> How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
> 
> Nasa is not an Indian agency.
> Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't
> involved.
> The other question you mentioned is also interesting: what had the
> people of NASA done with all the money (supposed the Moon land was a
> fake)???

You mean credits, not dollar. IE in Prometheus (2012) - IMDb they had 
credits, not dollars. For instance the still capitalist is saying "I am 
here to make 100 credits" LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web