Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #540278 > unrolled thread

Re: Is the universe curved or flat?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Is the universe curved or flat? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-19 09:11 -0800
    Re: Is the universe curved or flat? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-19 10:20 -0800
      every thing being curved, less or more noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-12-19 15:29 -0800
      Re: Is the universe curved or flat? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-25 08:48 -0800
        Re: Is the universe curved or flat? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-27 23:03 -0800

#540278 — Re: Is the universe curved or flat?

And people who come out with using the words 'curve and flat' in the same sentence are dumb:



"WMAP nailed down the curvature of space to
   within 0.4% of "flat" Euclidean."




Who do you think you're fooling?



Let me put it this way...

there is no such thing in outer space as '"flat" Euclidean'.


God does not play with "flat" Euclidean.



A lot of girls got what appears to be a flat butt, but if you look closer...it's curved.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#540282

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> And people who come out with using the words 'curve and flat' in the same sentence are dumb:
> 
> "WMAP nailed down the curvature of space to
>    within 0.4% of "flat" Euclidean."
> 
> Who do you think you're fooling?
> 
> Let me put it this way...
> 
> there is no such thing in outer space as '"flat" Euclidean'.
> 
> God does not play with "flat" Euclidean.
> 
> A lot of girls got what appears to be a flat butt, but if you look closer...it's curved.


Now I'll explain the center of the universe...


if you blow up a balloon
you will notice
the balloon has
two centers..

the center is
in the middle where
all the air is at..

and the center of
the surface where
you blew the balloon.


Now the earth has 
two centers..

the middle
of the earth...

and the center
on the surface
of the earth...

it might have 
sealed up by now...

so it might be hard to find..
(not that anybody is looking)


The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#540344 — every thing being curved, less or more

On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 10:20:45 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
the curvature is gaussian, in the sense that
it is primarily a local quality, although
aristarchus got the diameter within a few feet

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#541485

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > And people who come out with using the words 'curve and flat' in the same sentence are dumb:
> >
> > "WMAP nailed down the curvature of space to
> >    within 0.4% of "flat" Euclidean."
> >
> > Who do you think you're fooling?
> >
> > Let me put it this way...
> >
> > there is no such thing in outer space as '"flat" Euclidean'.
> >
> > God does not play with "flat" Euclidean.
> >
> > A lot of girls got what appears to be a flat butt, but if you look closer...it's curved.
> 
> Now I'll explain the center of the universe...
> 
> if you blow up a balloon
> you will notice
> the balloon has
> two centers..
> 
> the center is
> in the middle where
> all the air is at..
> 
> and the center of
> the surface where
> you blew the balloon.
> 
> Now the earth has
> two centers..
> 
> the middle
> of the earth...
> 
> and the center
> on the surface
> of the earth...
> 
> it might have
> sealed up by now...
> 
> so it might be hard to find..
> (not that anybody is looking)
> 
> The Starmaker


Or...

if you draw a circle..
whether you do it manually
or with a compass...

it has a beginning
and an end to the 
drawing of a circle...
that is the center.

Might be hard to
detect now in the
universe...with all
that mess up there..

hard to see...
hard to spot
hard to detect
hard to idenify
hard to recognize
hard to ..observe

but it's there.


The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#541889

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > And people who come out with using the words 'curve and flat' in the same sentence are dumb:
> > >
> > > "WMAP nailed down the curvature of space to
> > >    within 0.4% of "flat" Euclidean."
> > >
> > > Who do you think you're fooling?
> > >
> > > Let me put it this way...
> > >
> > > there is no such thing in outer space as '"flat" Euclidean'.
> > >
> > > God does not play with "flat" Euclidean.
> > >
> > > A lot of girls got what appears to be a flat butt, but if you look closer...it's curved.
> >
> > Now I'll explain the center of the universe...
> >
> > if you blow up a balloon
> > you will notice
> > the balloon has
> > two centers..
> >
> > the center is
> > in the middle where
> > all the air is at..
> >
> > and the center of
> > the surface where
> > you blew the balloon.
> >
> > Now the earth has
> > two centers..
> >
> > the middle
> > of the earth...
> >
> > and the center
> > on the surface
> > of the earth...
> >
> > it might have
> > sealed up by now...
> >
> > so it might be hard to find..
> > (not that anybody is looking)
> >
> > The Starmaker
> 
> Or...
> 
> if you draw a circle..
> whether you do it manually
> or with a compass...
> 
> it has a beginning
> and an end to the
> drawing of a circle...
> that is the center.
> 
> Might be hard to
> detect now in the
> universe...with all
> that mess up there..
> 
> hard to see...
> hard to spot
> hard to detect
> hard to idenify
> hard to recognize
> hard to ..observe
> 
> but it's there.
> 
> The Starmaker



it's probably the 'coolest' part of the universe, not the hottest.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web