Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #538029 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-08 10:23 -0800 |
| Last post | 2015-12-18 14:03 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 144 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 10:23 -0800
There Is No Edge To The Universe HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 10:51 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 13:04 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-08 22:17 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 17:54 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-08 22:57 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-08 19:15 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 21:27 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-09 07:20 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 08:56 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-09 15:11 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 16:38 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 10:41 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 08:48 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 04:50 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 14:08 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 16:51 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 10:54 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 17:00 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 12:35 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 18:52 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 13:01 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-09 22:15 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 15:35 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 21:55 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 15:59 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 22:13 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-09 20:35 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-10 15:33 +0000
wavey are things that noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 13:44 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 01:20 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-10 08:37 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-09 16:07 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 15:22 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 21:13 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 19:47 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 21:51 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 22:06 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 00:04 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-10 12:32 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 11:29 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 22:02 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-11 07:48 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-11 13:54 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 22:55 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-12 07:54 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 09:16 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-12 19:47 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2015-12-13 09:06 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-13 07:01 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-21 05:45 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 13:47 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 14:03 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 08:53 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 21:26 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 16:38 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 10:40 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 16:44 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 10:52 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 17:27 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 12:37 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 18:01 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-09 11:38 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 12:13 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-10 12:30 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 11:26 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-18 06:45 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-18 10:51 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-19 21:35 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-18 16:12 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 12:56 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-18 14:28 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-08 17:42 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-12-09 06:42 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-12-11 22:39 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 19:46 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 22:50 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 09:09 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 12:07 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 15:46 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-15 00:01 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 08:44 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 05:53 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 09:59 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-15 22:44 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 08:38 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 16:07 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 18:45 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 15:00 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 15:13 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 18:30 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 17:45 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 21:47 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 16:40 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-09 12:26 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 18:03 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 09:52 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-10 16:01 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2015-12-10 12:03 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-12-10 13:11 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 15:38 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-12-11 14:04 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 10:59 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 13:16 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 13:27 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 17:06 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 22:58 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 12:16 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 20:05 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-13 04:10 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-13 12:55 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-13 15:06 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-13 13:58 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 00:25 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 00:23 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 20:28 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 09:24 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 09:27 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 11:32 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 10:41 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 12:43 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 16:11 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 16:28 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 22:58 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 23:14 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-18 07:57 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-18 08:15 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2015-12-18 08:32 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-18 11:00 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-18 22:13 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-20 16:52 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-25 08:40 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-27 23:01 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 10:20 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 12:31 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 11:31 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 14:19 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 13:37 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-29 21:46 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 08:32 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 20:38 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-06 12:23 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 15:12 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-12-18 14:03 -0800
Page 6 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 Next page →
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-10 15:38 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <O_mdnYRRyclNbfTLnZ2dnUU7-YnOydjZ@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #538498 |
On 12/10/15 3:11 PM, Double-A wrote: > The truth is that the nature of the universe is being revealed to be > more like that envisioned by Giordano Bruno than Einstein. > > Double-A > How so? Where do they differ? -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-11 14:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ac229704-6064-49ba-a794-e28a42a7ef60@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #538509 |
On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 1:38:26 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 12/10/15 3:11 PM, Double-A wrote: > > The truth is that the nature of the universe is being revealed to be > > more like that envisioned by Giordano Bruno than Einstein. > > > > Double-A > > > > How so? Where do they differ? > Space in endless. Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-11 10:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <98db7b8e-546d-4eae-adad-04b28a4e8af7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #538029 |
On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 10:23:08 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > "There Is No Edge To The Universe". > > How many times have you heard that? > > It seems... > there is a small group of people.. > in the 'scientific community'.. > there is this ..belief or opinion, that > "There is no edge to the universe". > > They, go as far as telling everyone > "There is no edge to the universe". > > They will get together > and come up with > all kinds of explanations, > and numbers, to Why and How > "There is no edge to the universe". > > It's like a mantra. > "There is no edge to the universe" > "There is no edge to the universe" > "There is no edge to the universe" > > And if you disagree with them... > they will have you shot! > > So, why the mantra? > > Who discovered that there > is no edge to the universe? > > Did they send Columbus to look?? > > They will have you believe that > the universe is infinite. That is just > a ploy to have you believe... > "There is no edge to the universe". > > Get it? It's a con! > > > con > kän/ > > 1. > persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception. > > noun > noun: con; plural noun: cons > > 1. > an instance of deceiving or tricking someone. > > > The Question of course is...what is behind these people > from trying to convince everyone that > there is no edge to the universe? > > Why are they trying to deceive you? > > > The truth is, they don't even want you to question it. > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. There are an infinite # of universes,and none of them touch.Nor can they ever touch.Treb and I are safe for that reason.Its part of my TIME LAPSE THEORY TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-11 13:16 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <daKdnVrwT8u6vPbLnZ2dnUU7-TednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #538634 |
On 12/11/15 12:59 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > Its part of my TIME LAPSE THEORY Reber, you don't have a time lapse theory. No documentation, no mathematics, no testable predictions. No nothing! -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-11 13:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5d1b0659-1ff8-492c-a255-affbc75d312f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #538642 |
On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 11:16:58 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 12/11/15 12:59 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > > Its part of my TIME LAPSE THEORY > > Reber, you don't have a time lapse theory. No documentation, no > mathematics, no testable predictions. No nothing! > > -- > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > community, and physics-related social issues. Sam I am a clever person .A gifted thinker.I have answers to hard questions(always) I understand equasions,anbd have given out 100s of my G=EMC^2 to be framed.It is painted in oils.It has great Christmas meaning.Today I'm color printing over 200.I give them out to friends in Anaheim,and Fullerton.I love Christmas.All those that are part of M*M know this to be reality.On 9th of Feb. I wsll be 88 and yet 3 days ago working in a drive way I put a timimg belt and water pump in a 2004 KIA. I'm proud of that.TreBert.Sam we use to be friends so if you would like my G=EMC*2 and Chief Grey Cloud it would be my free gift to you.Its nice to be nice all days of a year.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-11 17:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2574a7f0-e9b6-443f-95b0-c332dfcece1a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #538656 |
show quoted text - Sam I am a clever person .A gifted thinker.I have answers to hard questions(always) I understand equasions,anbd have given out 100s of my G=EMC^2 to be framed.It is painted in oils.It has great Christmas meaning.Today I'm color printing over 200.I give them out to friends in Anaheim,and Fullerton.I love Christmas.All those that are part of M*M know this to be reality ---------- Bert's shitfaced again. Read what he wrote above in a drunken voice...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-11 22:58 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <K6ydnaKGP5nkNPbLnZ2dnUU7-aGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #538656 |
On 12/11/15 3:27 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > Sam I am a clever person .A gifted thinker.I have answers to hard questions(always) Unfortunately you never put answers in to practice. You never do anything. It's all just bullshit. And the Bar Maid will nod her head yes as long as you keep forking over some money. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-12 12:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <f721c648-d932-4919-aaf5-3fe4598cb19c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #538734 |
On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 8:58:37 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 12/11/15 3:27 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > > Sam I am a clever person .A gifted thinker.I have answers to hard questions(always) > > > Unfortunately you never put answers in to practice. You never do > anything. It's all just bullshit. And the Bar Maid will nod her > head yes as long as you keep forking over some money. > > > > -- > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > community, and physics-related social issues. The bar maid first was mentioned by Bohr to show short an easily worded theories were best. I go with Bohr TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-12 20:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pv3by.25334$v02.1046@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #538773 |
On 12/12/2015 03:16 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 8:58:37 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> On 12/11/15 3:27 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>>> Sam I am a clever person .A gifted thinker.I have answers to hard questions(always)
>>
>>
>> Unfortunately you never put answers in to practice. You never do
>> anything. It's all just bullshit. And the Bar Maid will nod her
>> head yes as long as you keep forking over some money.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
>> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
>> community, and physics-related social issues.
>
> The bar maid first was mentioned by Bohr to show short an easily worded theories were best. I go with Bohr TreBert
>
"Spin is In"
That says it all, Herb and is right on the money!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-13 04:10 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <09f18c35-4a3a-4204-a919-6a9896573489@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #538773 |
- show quoted text - The bar maid first was mentioned by Bohr to show short an easily worded theories were best. I go with Bohr TreBert ------- Ok then. In simple barmaid terms, explain your 'spin is in' theory. Remember, it's supposed to make sense
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-13 12:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2bdf7f71-3ec3-44b8-9ec9-4cca4d6937ef@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #538875 |
On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 4:10:34 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote: > - show quoted text - > The bar maid first was mentioned by Bohr to show short an easily worded theories were best. I go with Bohr TreBert > ------- > > Ok then. In simple barmaid terms, explain your 'spin is in' theory. > > Remember, it's supposed to make sense HVAC All stuff spins and at different speeds.Spinning creates their wave action.This action we see in electrons,and photons. This is easy thinking.Get the picture and I'll add in my WOBBLE THEORY if you like TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-13 15:06 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <jK6dnT4RsYlxQPDLnZ2dnUU7-VEAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #538926 |
On 12/13/15 2:55 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> HVAC All stuff spins and at different speeds.Spinning creates their wave action.This action we see in electrons,and photons. This is easy thinking.Get the picture and I'll add in my WOBBLE THEORY if you like TreBert
## #
## #
#########################################
#########################################
## ######
## ##########
############
##############
#############
#############
##############
#############
##############
#############
##############
############# #
############# #
#########################################
#########################################
#
########
###############
##################
#####################
#### ####
## ##
## ##
## ##
## ###
## ##
#### ####
#####################
##################
###############
########
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-13 13:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <44cb9e61-2272-4c13-9af3-15273a316385@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #538926 |
Obviously I'm not quite at the 'barmaid' level.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-14 00:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Yosby.32437$NY1.21233@fx35.iad> |
| In reply to | #538942 |
On 12/13/2015 04:58 PM, HVAC wrote:
> Obviously I'm not quite at the 'barmaid' level.
>
True, but I'll be you've played one on the INTERNET!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-14 00:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ansby.32434$NY1.625@fx35.iad> |
| In reply to | #538926 |
On 12/13/2015 03:55 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 4:10:34 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote:
>> - show quoted text -
>> The bar maid first was mentioned by Bohr to show short an easily worded theories were best. I go with Bohr TreBert
>> -------
>>
>> Ok then. In simple barmaid terms, explain your 'spin is in' theory.
>>
>> Remember, it's supposed to make sense
>
> HVAC All stuff spins and at different speeds.Spinning creates their wave action.This action we see in electrons,and photons. This is easy thinking.Get the picture and I'll add in my WOBBLE THEORY if you like TreBert
>
Wait a minute Treeb. What about stuff that spins at the SAME speed?
Forgot about that, didn't you?
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-11 20:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jLKay.23922$Qu1.22385@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #538634 |
On 12/11/2015 01:59 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 10:23:08 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
>> "There Is No Edge To The Universe".
>>
>> How many times have you heard that?
>>
>> It seems...
>> there is a small group of people..
>> in the 'scientific community'..
>> there is this ..belief or opinion, that
>> "There is no edge to the universe".
>>
>> They, go as far as telling everyone
>> "There is no edge to the universe".
>>
>> They will get together
>> and come up with
>> all kinds of explanations,
>> and numbers, to Why and How
>> "There is no edge to the universe".
>>
>> It's like a mantra.
>> "There is no edge to the universe"
>> "There is no edge to the universe"
>> "There is no edge to the universe"
>>
>> And if you disagree with them...
>> they will have you shot!
>>
>> So, why the mantra?
>>
>> Who discovered that there
>> is no edge to the universe?
>>
>> Did they send Columbus to look??
>>
>> They will have you believe that
>> the universe is infinite. That is just
>> a ploy to have you believe...
>> "There is no edge to the universe".
>>
>> Get it? It's a con!
>>
>>
>> con
>> kän/
>>
>> 1.
>> persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception.
>>
>> noun
>> noun: con; plural noun: cons
>>
>> 1.
>> an instance of deceiving or tricking someone.
>>
>>
>> The Question of course is...what is behind these people
>> from trying to convince everyone that
>> there is no edge to the universe?
>>
>> Why are they trying to deceive you?
>>
>>
>> The truth is, they don't even want you to question it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
>> the unchallengeable.
>
> There are an infinite # of universes,and none of them touch.Nor can they ever touch.Treb and I are safe for that reason.Its part of my TIME LAPSE THEORY TreBert
>
Garbage. They all touch at the Omega point. Moron. Goes for Treeb too!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 09:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a2c3e2b4-ade3-4388-99f7-75362e01e475@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #538029 |
On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 10:23:08 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > "There Is No Edge To The Universe". > > How many times have you heard that? > > It seems... > there is a small group of people.. > in the 'scientific community'.. > there is this ..belief or opinion, that > "There is no edge to the universe". > > They, go as far as telling everyone > "There is no edge to the universe". > > They will get together > and come up with > all kinds of explanations, > and numbers, to Why and How > "There is no edge to the universe". > > It's like a mantra. > "There is no edge to the universe" > "There is no edge to the universe" > "There is no edge to the universe" > > And if you disagree with them... > they will have you shot! > > So, why the mantra? > > Who discovered that there > is no edge to the universe? > > Did they send Columbus to look?? > > They will have you believe that > the universe is infinite. That is just > a ploy to have you believe... > "There is no edge to the universe". > > Get it? It's a con! > > > con > kän/ > > 1. > persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception. > > noun > noun: con; plural noun: cons > > 1. > an instance of deceiving or tricking someone. > > > The Question of course is...what is behind these people > from trying to convince everyone that > there is no edge to the universe? > > Why are they trying to deceive you? > > > The truth is, they don't even want you to question it. > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. Think of the edge of moving steam .Think of being in a fog,and try to think of its edge.That has to tell you something.TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 09:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c524f1c3-e56c-4eab-b71d-15150e1a95a9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #539838 |
It tells me that you're an alcoholic Bert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 11:32 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <dLadnfyRXrsrbO_LnZ2dnUU7-LednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #539838 |
On 12/17/15 11:24 AM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> Think of the edge of moving steam .Think of being in a fog,and try to think of its edge.That has to tell you something.TreBert
That tells me you don't appreciate the fact that the universe has no
edge, reber. Try learning from these first two links. Try it!
No Center
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html
Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html
WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html
WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 10:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <f70564e2-77c1-43eb-8436-8c47c5e7040b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #539842 |
On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 9:32:41 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 12/17/15 11:24 AM, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > > Think of the edge of moving steam .Think of being in a fog,and try to think of its edge.That has to tell you something.TreBert > > > That tells me you don't appreciate the fact that the universe has no > edge, reber. Try learning from these first two links. Try it! > > No Center > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html > > Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html > > WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html > > WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html > > > -- > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > community, and physics-related social issues. Sam I see the universe's edge the same way I see the edge of Earth's atmosphere as it sheds energy,hydrogen into space.Edge is not the best word.How about calling it universe horizon.? Outer surface.Area with least curvature.TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web