Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #534240 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-20 10:49 -0800 |
| Last post | 2015-12-10 19:29 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 119 — 32 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-20 10:49 -0800
Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-20 11:00 -0800
Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-21 17:16 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 00:57 -0500
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 22:17 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 01:30 -0500
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:18 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' "Alex Sutter" <invalid@troll-lo-lo.com> - 2015-11-22 08:36 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:48 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 09:17 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:31 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:26 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Puppet_Sock <puppet_sock@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-24 12:43 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-24 16:28 -0600
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 15:25 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 23:49 -0500
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-24 16:27 -0600
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-21 23:11 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-22 09:30 +0100
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 00:41 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:40 -0500
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 07:45 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 13:00 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-26 07:10 +0100
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 09:01 -0600
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2015-11-22 22:32 +0100
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 14:17 -0800
Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 21:37 -0800
Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-24 22:08 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 22:20 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-25 07:40 +0100
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-25 10:24 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-25 18:32 +0000
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-25 12:01 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-26 04:48 +0100
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-26 14:21 +0000
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-27 08:05 +0100
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-11-23 11:02 -0600
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-23 11:38 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 20:44 +0000
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 19:57 -0800
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 23:40 -0500
Re: The great unwashed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-23 21:46 -0800
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-23 22:23 -0800
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-11-24 08:31 -0500
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. "W.T.S. = Golden_Truth_Golden_Light!!!" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-11-24 06:00 -0600
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-24 06:49 -0600
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-24 08:57 -0500
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-24 10:10 -0800
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 11:14 -0700
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:59 -0500
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 12:07 -0700
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 14:48 -0500
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 13:03 -0700
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2015-11-24 08:16 -0600
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-11-24 15:54 +0100
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:43 -0500
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 12:07 -0700
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 14:50 -0500
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 13:02 -0700
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-11-24 14:04 -0600
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 13:08 -0700
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-11-24 18:05 -0600
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 17:15 -0700
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-11-24 13:56 -0600
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2015-11-24 14:32 -0600
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-24 14:44 -0600
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 12:55 -0800
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 14:10 -0700
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:22 -0500
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 06:08 -0800
Re: The great unwashed. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:21 -0500
Re: The great unwashed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-24 11:35 -0800
Re: The great unwashed. snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2015-11-24 19:56 +0000
Ben Jacoby should play poker. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-26 06:02 -0800
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 11:42 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 12:48 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 13:17 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-26 10:41 -0800
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 13:48 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-26 20:32 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 23:52 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-26 20:29 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 00:14 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-26 10:39 -0800
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 13:46 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 00:10 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 12:36 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 12:49 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-26 10:43 -0800
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 13:51 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-26 20:34 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 20:41 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-26 20:58 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-26 20:23 -0800
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-26 23:30 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-26 20:23 -0800
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 00:15 -0500
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-27 11:14 -0800
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 12:00 -0800
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 16:53 -0800
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 19:15 -0800
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-28 08:43 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-11-26 08:26 -0500
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2015-12-09 10:34 +0000
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 03:18 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-09 08:31 -0600
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 07:51 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 16:41 -0500
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-10 16:28 +0000
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 16:01 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' "Alfred Summers" <invalid@eyample.com> - 2015-12-10 17:55 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-11 03:23 +0000
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 07:23 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-11 22:33 +0000
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 15:41 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 22:10 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-10 23:24 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2015-12-10 19:29 +0000
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
| From | buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 20:32 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <5657b2c6$0$31344$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #535679 |
On 11/26/2015 1:48 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: <...> > that's all the leg these whackjob paranormal > believers have to stand on. > You have the nerve to call anyone a "whackjob", paranormal or otherwise, Sir Craptain? -- buZZard, AUK DoW #7
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 23:52 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <okR5y.225628$eK.4692@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #535679 |
On 11/26/2015 01:48 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:41:48 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>>
>> Oh yeah? Well I seen that one dude bend spoons with his mind before!
>
> Well, then THAT settles it. Psychokinesis is now a proven fact...
>
> LOL! Actually, it's so funny because that's all the leg these
> whackjob paranormal believers have to stand on.
And all you have to stand on is your faith! I love it when you
religious kooks get rolling. "I am a true believer and I know the truth
because, well just because I said so!" I have experiments and data and
you have absolutely nothing but ignorance and arrogance to back you up.
Want to try for my million dollar "prove Paranormal is hoax" prize? Like
the Amazing Randi I get to select who wins.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 20:29 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <5657b1de$0$52184$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #535674 |
On 11/26/2015 1:41 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: <...> > Oh yeah? Well I seen that one dude bend spoons with his mind before! > Don't bring a spoon to a fork fight. -- buZZard, AUK DoW #7
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 00:14 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <%ER5y.187738$M%.109451@fx20.iad> |
| In reply to | #535665 |
On 11/26/2015 01:17 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:48:51 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 11/26/2015 11:42 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 06:02:16 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
>>>> @Checkmate replied to Ben Jacoby replying to me:
>>>>>>> You flip a coin, hoping for heads, God willing;
>>>>>>> you have a 50% chance of getting it.
>>>>>>> In the end, you say "God Spoke".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if I so choose, I can use my mind to make it land as I say.
>>>>>> Yes, Rolf the laws of the Universe make us all that powerful!
>>>>>
>>>>> You sound like you have the vapours.
>>>>
>>>> Ben Jacoby has psychokinetic powers,
>>>> enough to alter a coin flip ?
>>>>
>>>> If true, he should play poker.
>>>
>>> If true he would go get Randi's million dollar
>>> prize but he'd have to prove his abilities in
>>> a scientific surrounding. Many have tried -
>>> ALL have failed.
>>
>> Perhaps you should try for my million dollar prize to prove that all the
>> century of experiments even by Nobel Prize winners is all fraud?
>
> One cannot prove scientifically that unsubstantiated claims
> are or may be false.
>
>> And Oh yeah, Like "The Amazing Randi" I'm the one who gets to say if you
>> won or not! I don't think you can do anything that will win.
>
> Showing your ignorance again? Randi's prize is staged in
> the presence of scientists and the conditions are strictly
> controlled and observed so no hanky-panky goes on. That
> is why the prize remains unclaimed - to date there has
> been no proof, under scientific observation, that any
> psychokinetics exist.
Absolute lie. The Amazing Randi makes the final determination on all
experiments. Lies have no place in science. Get the picture?
And the statement that there is no proof of psycho-kinetics exiting is a
lie as well. Or don't you believe in the validity of statistical
analysis. AH! QM is a fraud too? Oh wait! I think I DO go along with
that one!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 10:39 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30c0f1c93ffb5cee98b8b1@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #535628 |
In article <oide5b5htin81d14e106b9o0a00968ufk1@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_master.fake says... > > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 06:02:16 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote: > > >@Checkmate replied to Ben Jacoby replying to me: > >> > > You flip a coin, hoping for heads, God willing; > >> > > you have a 50% chance of getting it. > >> > > In the end, you say "God Spoke". > >> > > >> > if I so choose, I can use my mind to make it land as I say. > >> > Yes, Rolf the laws of the Universe make us all that powerful! > >> > >> You sound like you have the vapours. > > > >Ben Jacoby has psychokinetic powers, > >enough to alter a coin flip ? > > > >If true, he should play poker. > > If true he would go get Randi's million dollar > prize but he'd have to prove his abilities in > a scientific surrounding. Many have tried - > ALL have failed. Then they got the vapours and turned Japanese. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 13:46 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <7jke5blsp1d8vv93gtin9d5p9j8o8ha8ml@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #535673 |
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:39:38 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >In article <oide5b5htin81d14e106b9o0a00968ufk1@4ax.com>, >greghall@yacht_master.fake says... >> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 06:02:16 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote: >> >Checkmate replied to Ben Jacoby replying to me: >> >> > > You flip a coin, hoping for heads, God willing; >> >> > > you have a 50% chance of getting it. >> >> > > In the end, you say "God Spoke". >> >> > >> >> > if I so choose, I can use my mind to make it land as I say. >> >> > Yes, Rolf the laws of the Universe make us all that powerful! >> >> >> >> You sound like you have the vapours. >> > >> >Ben Jacoby has psychokinetic powers, >> >enough to alter a coin flip ? >> > >> >If true, he should play poker. >> >> If true he would go get Randi's million dollar >> prize but he'd have to prove his abilities in >> a scientific surrounding. Many have tried - >> ALL have failed. > >Then they got the vapours and turned Japanese. "The history of telekinesis is a history of frauds and fakery, both proven and suspected. Even many researchers studying psychokinesis admit that the data fall far short of scientific standards of proof. But they face an even bigger problem: there is no known mechanism by which the human mind could move or bend material objects. Even if our brain waves could somehow influence objects, the laws of physics demonstrate that the waves don't extend beyond a few millimeters from the skull. "People who claim to have telekinesis are mostly a thing of the past. Of course, if people really did have the ability to move objects with their minds, they would likely not waste their time being tested in laboratories but instead becoming rich in Las Vegas altering dice rolls at craps, or as top sports stars fixing golf shots." Source: http://www.livescience.com/28119-telekinesis.html I wish these whackjob, paranormal-believing, freaks of nature would just shrivel up and die and thus rid the world of the burden they place upon it. -- Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "It is my learned opinion that a man should not mince words just to spare the sensibilities of the thin-skinned or the ignorant."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 00:10 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <sBR5y.148671$NM.3017@fx22.iad> |
| In reply to | #535678 |
On 11/26/2015 01:46 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:39:38 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>> In article <oide5b5htin81d14e106b9o0a00968ufk1@4ax.com>,
>> greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 06:02:16 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
>>>> Checkmate replied to Ben Jacoby replying to me:
>>>>>>> You flip a coin, hoping for heads, God willing;
>>>>>>> you have a 50% chance of getting it.
>>>>>>> In the end, you say "God Spoke".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if I so choose, I can use my mind to make it land as I say.
>>>>>> Yes, Rolf the laws of the Universe make us all that powerful!
>>>>>
>>>>> You sound like you have the vapours.
>>>>
>>>> Ben Jacoby has psychokinetic powers,
>>>> enough to alter a coin flip ?
>>>>
>>>> If true, he should play poker.
>>>
>>> If true he would go get Randi's million dollar
>>> prize but he'd have to prove his abilities in
>>> a scientific surrounding. Many have tried -
>>> ALL have failed.
>>
>> Then they got the vapours and turned Japanese.
>
> "The history of telekinesis is a history of frauds
> and fakery, both proven and suspected. Even many
> researchers studying psychokinesis admit that the
> data fall far short of scientific standards of
> proof. But they face an even bigger problem: there
> is no known mechanism by which the human mind could
> move or bend material objects. Even if our brain
> waves could somehow influence objects, the laws of
> physics demonstrate that the waves don't extend
> beyond a few millimeters from the skull.
Absolute nonsense arguments. A history of fakes does not prove ALL are
fakes and frauds. Nobody admits that ALL data falls short of scientific
standards. If you know what happened in "all" experiments, then clearly
you possess superpowers. Go read what Crookes has to say about people
pooh-poohing experiments who weren't there and didn't even bother to
read descriptions. Basically you are saying you are an all-knowing
genius and all scientists who experiment with such phenomena are
incompetent. It takes little logic to see that your arguments are worthless.
Please explain your "theory" that when no mechanism is known to
"explain" soemthing that this means it can't exist. That's really
terrific science! Do you do magic tricks like The Amazing Randi too? I
also love your theory that if you don't know of how something works then
NOBODY can know and ever worse it means that such phenomena can't even
exist.
Your ignorance and arrogance is truly amazing.
(You may now name-call and ridicule to show how much "science" you know)
> "People who claim to have telekinesis are mostly a
> thing of the past. Of course, if people really did
> have the ability to move objects with their minds,
> they would likely not waste their time being tested
> in laboratories but instead becoming rich in Las
> Vegas altering dice rolls at craps, or as top sports
> stars fixing golf shots."
I trust you are aware that people who appear to have a talent at
altering dice etc. get banned from casinos. Clearly people with the
money at least SUSPECT that something at times may be going on. They
just don't have your faith.
> Source: http://www.livescience.com/28119-telekinesis.html
Gosh a "skeptical Science" website! I heard that if it's on the INTERNET
it MUST be true! You do know there is a "skepticalscience" website that
"proves" global warming is true (in spite of no temperature rise for 17
years). I"m sure you believe in glow-bull warming too. That kind of
fraud seems right up your belief alley.
> I wish these whackjob, paranormal-believing, freaks of
> nature would just shrivel up and die and thus rid the
> world of the burden they place upon it.
Clearly you are the one with the religious beliefs here. Why do those
who are shown to be morons always wish violence and death upon those
bringing up the data? Anti-science jihad, I suspect. Do you smash
antiquities too? I suggest you take a little time to forget your
religion and learn how science actually works. You might actually one
day discover something that you never heard of before!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 12:36 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <fqH5y.151906$gK.54109@fx26.iad> |
| In reply to | #535592 |
On 11/26/2015 09:02 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> @Checkmate replied to Ben Jacoby replying to me:
>>>> You flip a coin, hoping for heads, God willing;
>>>> you have a 50% chance of getting it.
>>>> In the end, you say "God Spoke".
>>>
>>> if I so choose, I can use my mind to make it land as I say.
>>> Yes, Rolf the laws of the Universe make us all that powerful!
>>
>> You sound like you have the vapours.
>
> Ben Jacoby has psychokinetic powers,
> enough to alter a coin flip ?
>
> If true, he should play poker.
Actually, ROlf, it hasn't been established that *I* possess such powers.
However, it HAS been established that such powers exist. An ability to
modify not only coin flips but REAL random number generators. However,
generally speaking there are strong indications that everyone has such
powers even if latent. For example it takes no special "talent" to
develop remote viewing.
Of course, I wouldn't expect you to actually be familiar with such
experiments than I would HVAC to have studied any science.
It's always best to just give your opinion assuring everyone you are
correct without ever having looked at any evidence for your opinion.
This is what is called "the scientific method" in your and HVAC's world.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 12:49 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <jfhe5bhhol1sailtifn2ihtcegtnulbmld@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #535643 |
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:36:10 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> wrote: >Actually, ROlf, it hasn't been established that *I* possess such powers. >However, it HAS been established that such powers exist. An ability to >modify not only coin flips but REAL random number generators. However, >generally speaking there are strong indications that everyone has such >powers even if latent. For example it takes no special "talent" to >develop remote viewing. > >Of course, I wouldn't expect you to actually be familiar with such >experiments than I would HVAC to have studied any science. > >It's always best to just give your opinion assuring everyone you are >correct without ever having looked at any evidence for your opinion. > >This is what is called "the scientific method" in your and HVAC's world. "Just remember, there is no spoon." -- Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "It is my learned opinion that a man should not mince words just to spare the sensibilities of the thin-skinned or the ignorant."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 10:43 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30c0f2b3a506ebed98b8b3@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #535652 |
In article <jfhe5bhhol1sailtifn2ihtcegtnulbmld@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_master.fake says... > > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:36:10 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Actually, ROlf, it hasn't been established that *I* possess such powers. > >However, it HAS been established that such powers exist. An ability to > >modify not only coin flips but REAL random number generators. However, > >generally speaking there are strong indications that everyone has such > >powers even if latent. For example it takes no special "talent" to > >develop remote viewing. > > > >Of course, I wouldn't expect you to actually be familiar with such > >experiments than I would HVAC to have studied any science. > > > >It's always best to just give your opinion assuring everyone you are > >correct without ever having looked at any evidence for your opinion. > > > >This is what is called "the scientific method" in your and HVAC's world. > > > "Just remember, there is no spoon." Oh yes there is, ans it's BENT! -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 13:51 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <13le5bdm39hvql4399n6gn3qs0jg1175ub@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #535675 |
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:43:38 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >In article <jfhe5bhhol1sailtifn2ihtcegtnulbmld@4ax.com>, >greghall@yacht_master.fake says... <...> >> >> "Just remember, there is no spoon." > >Oh yes there is, an(d) it's BENT! Now, don't be getting Pandora's hopes up. -- Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "It is my learned opinion that a man should not mince words just to spare the sensibilities of the thin-skinned or the ignorant."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 20:34 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <5657b337$0$1786$c3e8da3$f017e9df@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #535680 |
On 11/26/2015 1:51 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > Now, don't be getting Pandora's hopes up. > Why do you hump her so much? -- buZZard, AUK DoW #7
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 20:41 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <q3df5b9isopls4bpagidgq08occcdb19cu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #535781 |
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:34:49 -0500, buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 11/26/2015 1:51 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> Now, don't be getting Pandora's hopes up. >> >Why do you hump her so much? Who, ME? If I was gonna hump anybody it would be Miley Cyrus. -- Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "It is my learned opinion that a man should not mince words just to spare the sensibilities of the thin-skinned or the ignorant."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 20:58 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <5657b8ce$0$1512$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #535786 |
On 11/26/2015 8:41 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:34:49 -0500, buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 11/26/2015 1:51 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> Now, don't be getting Pandora's hopes up. >>> >> Why do you hump her so much? > > Who, ME? > Yep. > > If I was gonna hump anybody it would be Miley Cyrus. > I did a double take to be sure you didn't type Billy Ray. 8^) -- buZZard, AUK DoW #7
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 20:23 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30c17ab62392e8aa98b8d4@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #535795 |
In article <5657b8ce$0$1512$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com>, buzz@nospam.invalid says... > > On 11/26/2015 8:41 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:34:49 -0500, buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> On 11/26/2015 1:51 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >>> Now, don't be getting Pandora's hopes up. > >>> > >> Why do you hump her so much? > > > > Who, ME? > > > Yep. > > > > If I was gonna hump anybody it would be Miley Cyrus. > > > I did a double take to be sure you didn't > type Billy Ray. 8^) Billy Ray's probably already stuffed him. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 23:30 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <5657dc67$0$43896$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #535834 |
On 11/26/2015 11:23 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > In article <5657b8ce$0$1512$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com>, > buzz@nospam.invalid says... >> On 11/26/2015 8:41 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:34:49 -0500, buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 11/26/2015 1:51 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>> Now, don't be getting Pandora's hopes up. >>>>> >>>> Why do you hump her so much? >>> >>> Who, ME? >> > >> Yep. >> > >>> If I was gonna hump anybody it would be Miley Cyrus. >>> >> I did a double take to be sure you didn't >> type Billy Ray. 8^) > > Billy Ray's probably already stuffed him. > There's no way Billy would stoop so low...is there? -- buZZard, AUK DoW #7
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 20:23 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30c17a8e809c14a998b8d3@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #535786 |
In article <q3df5b9isopls4bpagidgq08occcdb19cu@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_master.fake says... > > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:34:49 -0500, buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >On 11/26/2015 1:51 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> Now, don't be getting Pandora's hopes up. > >> > >Why do you hump her so much? > > Who, ME? If I was gonna hump anybody it would > be Miley Cyrus. Miley's more man than you'll ever be, and more woman than you could handle. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 00:15 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. |
| Message-ID | <RFR5y.187739$M%.113125@fx20.iad> |
| In reply to | #535652 |
On 11/26/2015 12:49 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:36:10 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Actually, ROlf, it hasn't been established that *I* possess such powers.
>> However, it HAS been established that such powers exist. An ability to
>> modify not only coin flips but REAL random number generators. However,
>> generally speaking there are strong indications that everyone has such
>> powers even if latent. For example it takes no special "talent" to
>> develop remote viewing.
>>
>> Of course, I wouldn't expect you to actually be familiar with such
>> experiments than I would HVAC to have studied any science.
>>
>> It's always best to just give your opinion assuring everyone you are
>> correct without ever having looked at any evidence for your opinion.
>>
>> This is what is called "the scientific method" in your and HVAC's world.
>
>
> "Just remember, there is no spoon."
Senile babble.
HVAC is gay too.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 11:14 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. |
| Message-ID | <2LednWuWaq0TNsXLnZ2dnUVZ5gCdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #534817 |
"Jeff-Relf.Me" wrote in message
news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.23{4.35P.Seattle.2015}...
Most scientists think "Life" requires liquid water. Ben_Jacoby
(benj), on the other hand, thinks something like "Star Wars" could be
true. Darwin showed how we're related to monkeys; fearing it might
justify murder and such, many reject it. Truth is: We're robots,
programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Like the sun, stars and
everything else... we consume "exergy" (energy that can do work); i.e.
we ratchet entropy. "Randomness" is ignorance, nothing more.
*** Actually, it is SEX and BEER that motivates humankind aspire to
greatness ....
... SEX because it feels good and BEER, because there are lots and
lots of ugly women out there ....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 12:00 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. |
| Message-ID | <5658B677.BB3@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #535948 |
=?UTF-8?B?SMOkZ2Fy?= wrote:
>
> "Jeff-Relf.Me" wrote in message
> news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.23{4.35P.Seattle.2015}...
>
> Most scientists think "Life" requires liquid water. Ben_Jacoby
> (benj), on the other hand, thinks something like "Star Wars" could be
> true. Darwin showed how we're related to monkeys; fearing it might
> justify murder and such, many reject it. Truth is: We're robots,
> programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Like the sun, stars and
> everything else... we consume "exergy" (energy that can do work); i.e.
> we ratchet entropy. "Randomness" is ignorance, nothing more.
>
> *** Actually, it is SEX and BEER that motivates humankind aspire to
> greatness ....
> ... SEX because it feels good and BEER, because there are lots and
> lots of ugly women out there ....
Is that why I see ugy fat girls showing up at nightclubs one half hour
before it closes??
..and the ugly guys wait outside when it closes to pick up the drunk
chicks that are on their way out.
liquor is quicker..that is why God made beer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web