Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #533550 > unrolled thread

scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-16 10:59 -0800
    Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 14:08 -0600
      Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-16 15:33 -0500
        Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 14:48 -0600
        Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-16 20:59 +0000
      Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 14:34 -0800
    Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-16 16:11 -0600
    Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-16 19:10 -0800
      Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 21:15 -0600
        Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-11-16 22:27 -0500
        Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-17 03:48 +0000
        Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 23:25 -0500
        Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-17 07:52 -0600
          Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-17 16:57 -0800
            Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 19:14 -0600
              Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-18 02:14 +0000
        Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-11-17 19:42 -0600
        Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress Puppet_Sock <puppet_sock@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-19 07:09 -0800
          Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 09:50 -0600
            Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-11-19 23:37 -0500
              Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-11-20 11:49 -0500
          Re: scientists-to-be-grilled-by-congress Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 21:53 +0100

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#534202

On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 23:37:50 -0500, Wally W. wrote:

>On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 09:50:24 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>>On 11/19/15 9:09 AM, Puppet_Sock wrote:
>>   I wonder what thickness you envisioning for the surface
>>   of the earth, and the thermal conductivity of water, ice,
>>   snow, soil and rock.
>
>And *you* would do *what* with this information?

Sam's contribution to the "discussion" he says he wants: <crickets>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534083

Dne 19/11/2015 v 16:09 Puppet_Sock napsal(a):

> 
> You obviously are stating this wrong. If the net energy
> imbalance of the Earth were 0.5 W/m^2 it would be 15 MJ
> per square meter per year. 15 MJ of "imbalance" would
> do a lot more than warm the surface by some tiny fraction
> of a degree.
> 
So let see..

The ocean has the mean depth about 3700 m. */
The column above the square meter have mass about 3,700,000 kg.
Water has specific heat capacity 4.2 kJ/kg/degC.
For 3,700,000 kg it is cca 15.5 GJ/degC.

So, if all that power were used to warm the ocean ( it is not ),
it would warm the water in average about 0.001 degC per year,
0.1 degC in 100 years.

In reality surface waters more, deep waters less.

*/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean

-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web