Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #533408 > unrolled thread

this dark stuff is what killed the dinosaurs??

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2015-11-15 15:25 -0800
Last post2015-11-17 14:41 -0800
Articles 9 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  this dark stuff is what killed the dinosaurs?? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-15 15:25 -0800
    Re: this dark stuff is what killed the dinosaurs?? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 19:05 -0600
    Re: this dark stuff is what killed the dinosaurs?? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 19:25 -0600
    Re: this dark stuff is what killed the dinosaurs?? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-16 13:10 -0800
      Re: this dark stuff is what killed the dinosaurs?? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 19:34 -0600
        Re: this dark stuff is what killed the dinosaurs?? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-16 18:11 -0800
      Re: this dark stuff is what killed the dinosaurs?? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-16 18:02 -0800
    Re: this dark stuff is what killed the dinosaurs?? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 15:37 -0600
    Re: this dark stuff is what killed the dinosaurs?? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 14:41 -0800

#533408 — this dark stuff is what killed the dinosaurs??

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2015-11-15 15:25 -0800
Subjectthis dark stuff is what killed the dinosaurs??
Message-ID<5649144E.3BBB@ix.netcom.com>
"dark energy," and "cosmological constant"  seems to mean the same thing
as some of yous use both terms...

http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/11/opinions/lincoln-einstein-dark-energy/



But, another mad scientist seems to be saying this dark stuff is what killed the dinosaurs.

http://www.phillyvoice.com/harvard-physicist-proposes-radical-theory-human-existence/

Is there no end to yours madness????


I didn't know "mad scientists" came in both forms, men and women..


A woman mad scientist would make a good movie...

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#533427

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-15 19:05 -0600
Message-ID<DYydnQvN9L5XttTLnZ2dnUU7-TP_fwAA@giganews.com>
In reply to#533408

   The iridium in the earth's geologic record between the fossils of
   dinosaurs and fossils of mammals, is a dead giveaway -- impact of
   an iridium rich asteroid.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#533436

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-15 19:25 -0600
Message-ID<DYydnQTN9L4frdTLnZ2dnUU7-TOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#533408
   Cretaceous: Extinction of the Dinosaurs
> http://paleobiology.si.edu/geotime/main/htmlVersion/cretaceous4.html

> Extinction of the Dinosaurs

> Perhaps the most notable event of the Cretaceous was its conclusion.
> About 65 million years ago the second greatest mass extinction in
> Earth history occurred, resulting in the loss of the dinosaurs as
> well as nearly 50% of all the world’s species. Though not nearly as
> severe as the end-Permian mass extinction, the end-Cretaceous
> extinction is the most famous mass extinction in Earth history. Other
> great animals also went extinct at that time, including flying
> reptiles (pterosaurs) and the last mosasaurs and plesiosaurs. Many
> mollusks, including rudistid and inoceramid clams, ammonites, and
> belemnites, also became extinct, as did many species of microscopic
> marine plankton. Terrestrial plants also suffered a major extinction
> at this time; in some regions up to 60% of latest Cretaceous plant
> species were absent in the subsequent Paleocene. Terrestrial insects
> also suffered a high level of extinction, especially those that were
> highly specialized to feed on one or a few types of plants. In fact,
> the level of insect herbivory—both generalized and specialized—did
> not recover to latest Cretaceous levels until the Paleocene-Eocene
> boundary, approximately 9 million years later. In spite of the
> severity of extinctions at the end of the Cretaceous, many types of
> animals and plants survived and gave rise to new groups of organisms
> in the Paleocene.
>
> The causes of the end-Cretaceous extinction are still being debated
> by paleontologists. Researchers agree that a major factor was an
> asteroid about 10 kilometers in diameter that struck what is now the
> Yucatán peninsula in Mexico. The effects of the impact were
> catastrophic, probably including global forest fires, possibly a
> period of cold weather due to sunlight-blocking dust and smoke, and a
> subsequent period of hot climate caused by the high levels of CO2
> released into the atmosphere by the impact. Evidence for the
> devastation of terrestrial vegetation comes in the form of a thin
> rock layer deposited just after the impact that is dominated by
> fossil plants whose present-day relatives recover well after fires or
> other disturbances. Some paleontologists argue that dinosaurs were
> already in decline before the asteroid impact, so that its
> environmental effects merely hastened their extinction.
> Alternatively, others point to the high abundance and variety of
> dinosaur species recorded even in the sediments deposited just below
> the asteroid impact layer in the Hell Creek Formation of western
> North America.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#533607

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2015-11-16 13:10 -0800
Message-ID<564A462B.42DD@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#533408
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> "dark energy," and "cosmological constant"  seems to mean the same thing
> as some of yous use both terms...
> 
> http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/11/opinions/lincoln-einstein-dark-energy/
> 
> But, another mad scientist seems to be saying this dark stuff is what killed the dinosaurs.
> 
> http://www.phillyvoice.com/harvard-physicist-proposes-radical-theory-human-existence/
> 
> Is there no end to yours madness????
> 
> I didn't know "mad scientists" came in both forms, men and women..
> 
> A woman mad scientist would make a good movie...


so, she says a pancake killed the dinosaurs.


You know...it could've been the french toast instead.


She must spend a lot of time in the kitchen...where she belongs.


http://www.businessinsider.com/lisa-randall-thinks-dark-matter-killed-the-dinosaurs-2015-11

https://cdanews.com/2015/11/physicist-lisa-randall-has-a-new-theory-for-why-humans-exist/



"Physicist Dr. Lisa Randall has a new theory for what killed the dinosaur and gave rise to humans. 
In her latest book, , she posits that the extinction of the dinosaurs, which is necessary for the emergence of humans, is associated to dark matter." 
https://cdanews.com/2015/11/physicist-lisa-randall-has-a-new-theory-for-why-humans-exist/



Now, that is what I call a kook!


I already stated in the past what killed the dinosaurs...
there simply were not enough girl dinosaurs around.


The Starmaker




I bet you Lisa is hot in bed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#533681

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-16 19:34 -0600
Message-ID<Bb6dnQ0C6_mIGdfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#533607
On 11/16/15 3:10 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> she says a pancake killed the dinosaurs


   Are you sure about that?
> https://tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/disbelief.jpg?



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#533688

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2015-11-16 18:11 -0800
Message-ID<564A8CD0.5A83@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#533681
Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 11/16/15 3:10 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > she says a pancake killed the dinosaurs
> 
>    Are you sure about that?


It says it there in the link I provided:


"In her book, Randall describes a dark, pancake-shaped patty of densely
packed dark matter within 
our galaxy that could be responsible for our emergence as a species."

http://www.businessinsider.com/lisa-randall-thinks-dark-matter-killed-the-dinosaurs-2015-11



pancakes ...Aunt Jemima pancake mix killed the dinosaurs! 



Is this girl hot or what?




lisa-randall-thinks-dark-people-killed-the-dinosaurs-



lisa-randall-thinks-pancakes-killed-the-dinosaurs-


lisa-randall-thinks-Aunt-Jemimar-killed-the-dinosaurs-



Is this girl hot or what??

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#533686

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2015-11-16 18:02 -0800
Message-ID<564A8AB1.2B29@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#533607
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > "dark energy," and "cosmological constant"  seems to mean the same thing
> > as some of yous use both terms...
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/11/opinions/lincoln-einstein-dark-energy/
> >
> > But, another mad scientist seems to be saying this dark stuff is what killed the dinosaurs.
> >
> > http://www.phillyvoice.com/harvard-physicist-proposes-radical-theory-human-existence/
> >
> > Is there no end to yours madness????
> >
> > I didn't know "mad scientists" came in both forms, men and women..
> >
> > A woman mad scientist would make a good movie...
> 
> so, she says a pancake killed the dinosaurs.
> 
> You know...it could've been the french toast instead.


No, it had to be a pancake!...and the dark matter is aunt jemima!! 


Why do they let girls in the 'scientific community'????




> 
> She must spend a lot of time in the kitchen...where she belongs.
> 
> http://www.businessinsider.com/lisa-randall-thinks-dark-matter-killed-the-dinosaurs-2015-11
> 
> https://cdanews.com/2015/11/physicist-lisa-randall-has-a-new-theory-for-why-humans-exist/
> 
> "Physicist Dr. Lisa Randall has a new theory for what killed the dinosaur and gave rise to humans.
> In her latest book, , she posits that the extinction of the dinosaurs, which is necessary for the emergence of humans, is associated to dark matter."
> https://cdanews.com/2015/11/physicist-lisa-randall-has-a-new-theory-for-why-humans-exist/
> 
> Now, that is what I call a kook!
> 
> I already stated in the past what killed the dinosaurs...
> there simply were not enough girl dinosaurs around.
> 
> The Starmaker
> 
> I bet you Lisa is hot in bed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#533624

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-16 15:37 -0600
Message-ID<gb-dnTfRp48I0dfLnZ2dnUU7-eWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#533408
On 11/15/15 5:25 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> "dark energy," and "cosmological constant"  seems to mean the same thing


   The cosmological constant term the the general relativity equations
   is an excellent was to account for the effects of dark energy.

   More data is required to sort out of dark energy is constant or
   accelerating.

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#533863

From"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-17 14:41 -0800
Message-ID<55a0b53a-2b10-41a0-bf84-cfdbe51fb100@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#533408
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 3:25:08 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> "dark energy," and "cosmological constant"  seems to mean the same thing
> as some of yous use both terms...
> 
> http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/11/opinions/lincoln-einstein-dark-energy/
> 
> 
> 
> But, another mad scientist seems to be saying this dark stuff is what killed the dinosaurs.
> 
> http://www.phillyvoice.com/harvard-physicist-proposes-radical-theory-human-existence/
> 
> Is there no end to yours madness????
> 
> 
> I didn't know "mad scientists" came in both forms, men and women..
> 
> 
> A woman mad scientist would make a good movie...

Black rats killed of cold blooded animals.TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web