Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #530022 > unrolled thread

Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time

Started bySam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
First post2015-11-02 15:33 -0600
Last post2015-11-04 14:20 -0500
Articles 13 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 15:33 -0600
    Re: Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-02 14:04 -0800
      Re: Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 16:08 -0600
        Re: Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-02 22:19 +0000
        Re: Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 09:11 -0800
      Re: Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 03:14 -0800
        Re: Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:19 -0800
          Re: Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 14:20 -0800
            t**t happenneth noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 18:45 -0800
            Re: Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-04 22:56 -0800
          Re: Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 05:03 -0800
        Re: Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-04 06:27 -0600
        Re: Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 14:20 -0500

#530022 — Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-02 15:33 -0600
SubjectViewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time
Message-ID<D9idnXD7rtAIS6rLnZ2dnUU7-eEAAAAA@giganews.com>
Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time
> http://physics.aps.org/articles/v8/106


> Entropy production, a quantity associated with the emergence of the
> arrow of time, has been successfully measured in a microscopic
> quantum system.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#530028

FromDouble-A <double-a3@hush.com>
Date2015-11-02 14:04 -0800
Message-ID<a84fecb6-a2fd-4c3a-b4d9-babd547e8bd1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#530022
On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 1:33:11 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time
> > http://physics.aps.org/articles/v8/106
> 
> 
> > Entropy production, a quantity associated with the emergence of the
> > arrow of time, has been successfully measured in a microscopic
> > quantum system.


Does that mean the past DID happen?

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530031

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-02 16:08 -0600
Message-ID<adadnUztJe1lQ6rLnZ2dnUU7-K-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#530028
On 11/2/15 4:04 PM, Double-A wrote:
> On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 1:33:11 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time
>>> http://physics.aps.org/articles/v8/106
>>
>>
>>> Entropy production, a quantity associated with the emergence of the
>>> arrow of time, has been successfully measured in a microscopic
>>> quantum system.
>
>
> Does that mean the past DID happen?
>
> Double-A
>

   What do you think?  Can the past be falsified?




-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530035

FromFabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain>
Date2015-11-02 22:19 +0000
Message-ID<pan.2015.11.02.22.19.36@localhost.localdomain>
In reply to#530031
On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 16:08:56 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:

> 
>    What do you think?  Can the past be falsified?
>

Asks Wormley, as his audience of simpletons looks on with mouths agape.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530550

From"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-05 09:11 -0800
Message-ID<31d3e5ed-0f1f-4268-99ea-61c2b44bfd81@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#530031
On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 2:08:59 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 11/2/15 4:04 PM, Double-A wrote:
> > On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 1:33:11 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> >> Viewpoint: Nuclear Spin Points out Arrow of Time
> >>> http://physics.aps.org/articles/v8/106
> >>
> >>
> >>> Entropy production, a quantity associated with the emergence of the
> >>> arrow of time, has been successfully measured in a microscopic
> >>> quantum system.
> >
> >
> > Does that mean the past DID happen?
> >
> > Double-A
> >
> 
>    What do you think?  Can the past be falsified?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.

Kip Thorne,and his Russian science friend don;t think you can kill your grandfather. I do and so does Steven King TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530316

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-04 03:14 -0800
Message-ID<ce2e8652-e914-4789-bbb0-be9e25bfa249@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#530028
On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 10:04:20 PM UTC, Double-A wrote:
>
> Does that mean the past DID happen?


Time/entropy is simply a product of the expansion of the universe. 

The past is the only thing that is real and immutable. The future hasn't happened and the present is now the past.

Oh, and there can NEVER be time travel to the past. Ever

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530318

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-04 04:19 -0800
Message-ID<3e492f73-d0a8-403c-a8b8-392520ff6a62@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#530316
Time is BECAUSE of universal expansion?
LOL
What an idiot

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530408

From"Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-04 14:20 -0800
Message-ID<d6a47914-71a4-49de-acbb-3d496ca2caa3@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#530318
On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 4:20:00 AM UTC-8, john wrote:
> Time is BECAUSE of universal expansion?
> LOL
> What an idiot

Time goes back forever, 
Space goes on forever, 
this is to fit the Universe 
into one Continuum.

This is for "conservation of numbers" 
following "conservation of truth".

Simply stated, then mapping this 
up to the equations and their 
fundamental physical constants 
is quite a task.

Expansion seems courtesy 
symmetry of variety and diversity 
about the conservation of the regular.

Quantum theory sees parastatistics, 
not "many worlds" (any one of which 
could be singular again).

This then is for novel mathematics 
for probability, in both the uniform 
or regular and centralized and Gaussian, 
for Bose, Fermi, Einstein, and parastatistics, 
with the Bayesian, Jeffreys', and of 
"Time, Chance, and Reduction".

Also it is for the concomitant features of 
the discrete in the continuous, and 
continuous as of the discrete, in the 
various systems that are of each.

"What's a Stephen Hawking prank?"
"Turn the light cone 90 degrees."
"HA HA HA."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530480 — t**t happenneth

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-04 18:45 -0800
Subjectt**t happenneth
Message-ID<f547e318-85dd-4278-87b1-eafebb3d15c2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#530408
gOOd one;
shows that timennspcenn is simple phase-space,
1+3; proper fourdimensionality is to
use homogenous tetrahedral coordinates (or,
dually, tetra-asteral coordinates

> "What's a Stephen Hawking prank?"
> "Turn the light cone 90 degrees."
> "HA HA HA."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530513

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2015-11-04 22:56 -0800
Message-ID<563AFDB3.E8E@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#530408
Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 4:20:00 AM UTC-8, john wrote:
> > Time is BECAUSE of universal expansion?
> > LOL
> > What an idiot
> 
> Time goes back forever,
> Space goes on forever,
> this is to fit the Universe
> into one Continuum.
> 
> This is for "conservation of numbers"
> following "conservation of truth".
> 
> Simply stated, then mapping this
> up to the equations and their
> fundamental physical constants
> is quite a task.
> 
> Expansion seems courtesy
> symmetry of variety and diversity
> about the conservation of the regular.


"of the regular" what????  Did you forget to finish the sentence? You
are mising one word...what is that word??

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530532

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-05 05:03 -0800
Message-ID<4e4e5f17-d54f-457e-8c99-dcd4fc9119f0@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#530318
Sorry BJ. This is cutting edge science. Meanwhile you are still defending ghosts, gods and esp.

You just are not intellectually capable of understanding.

Sorry not sorry

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530320

Fromgilber34 <fafa@invalid.com>
Date2015-11-04 06:27 -0600
Message-ID<n1ctjj$aob$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#530316
On 11/4/2015 5:14 AM, HVAC wrote:
> On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 10:04:20 PM UTC, Double-A wrote:
>>
>> Does that mean the past DID happen?
>
>
> Time/entropy is simply a product of the expansion of the universe.
>
> The past is the only thing that is real and immutable. The future hasn't happened and the present is now the past.


yes, that was then just now, and this is now, now.


Example;
Donald Trump is not the Future yet. Obamma is now.




>
> Oh, and there can NEVER be time travel to the past. Ever
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530374

Frombenj <nobody@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-04 14:20 -0500
Message-ID<lUs_x.6$UA5.3@fx26.iad>
In reply to#530316
On 11/04/2015 06:14 AM, HVAC wrote:
> On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 10:04:20 PM UTC, Double-A wrote:
>>
>> Does that mean the past DID happen?
>
>
> Time/entropy is simply a product of the expansion of the universe.
>
> The past is the only thing that is real and immutable. The future hasn't happened and the present is now the past.
>
> Oh, and there can NEVER be time travel to the past. Ever

Big Bang (and hence expansion of universe) is bullshit.



-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web