Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #524213 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-02 01:17 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-10-04 07:53 -0500 |
| Articles | 18 on this page of 98 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-02 01:17 -0700
Re: green stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 08:19 -0500
Re: green stars john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 06:30 -0700
Re: green stars Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 08:59 -0500
Re: green stars benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 12:24 -0400
Re: green stars HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 10:19 -0700
Re: green stars Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-03 12:14 +0200
Re: green stars Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-10-02 14:40 -0400
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-02 22:18 +0000
Re: green stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 17:45 -0500
Re: green stars Angelo <patrizio.pan-2002@libero.it> - 2015-10-05 08:30 -0700
Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 16:02 -0700
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-03 02:29 +0000
Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 22:29 -0700
Re: green stars Joy Beeson <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> - 2015-10-03 23:49 -0300
Re: green stars "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2015-10-04 08:48 +0100
Re: green stars Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 11:07 -0500
Re: green stars "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2015-10-04 12:50 -0400
Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 10:54 -0700
Re: green stars "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 13:21 -0400
Re: green stars Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-10-04 11:15 -0600
Re: green stars Stumpy <perilmung@spamnet.con> - 2015-10-05 13:39 -0700
Re: green stars "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2015-10-04 09:27 -0400
Re: green stars William Vetter <mdhangton@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 16:45 -0400
Re: green stars Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-10-03 17:40 -0400
Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 14:51 -0700
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-03 21:54 +0000
Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:24 -0700
Re: green stars wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-10-04 06:46 -0400
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-04 13:15 +0000
Re: green stars jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-04 14:27 +0000
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-04 16:53 +0000
Re: green stars jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-05 13:02 +0000
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-05 14:39 +0000
Re: green stars jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-06 13:34 +0000
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-06 14:24 +0000
Re: green stars jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-07 13:18 +0000
Re: green stars Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-10-07 19:27 -0400
Re: green stars "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2015-10-07 19:43 -0400
Re: green stars Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-10-08 01:58 -0600
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 01:11 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 13:49 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 21:20 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-09 22:04 -0700
Re: green stars wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-10-08 08:19 -0400
Re: green stars pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-08 08:59 -0700
Re: green stars Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-10-09 00:10 -0600
Re: green stars William Vetter <mdhangton@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 13:19 -0400
Re: green stars wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-10-09 21:27 -0400
Re: green stars Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-10-10 20:12 -0600
Re: green stars Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 19:08 -0500
Re: green stars Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> - 2015-10-05 17:20 -0700
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-06 01:09 +0000
Re: green stars "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 22:21 -0400
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-06 02:33 +0000
Re: green stars "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 23:03 -0400
Re: green stars Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> - 2015-10-05 22:03 -0700
Re: green stars Wayne Brown <fwbrown@bellsouth.net> - 2015-10-08 19:38 +0000
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-08 22:19 +0000
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 16:14 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 16:16 -0700
Re: green stars pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-08 17:33 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 19:33 -0700
Re: green stars pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-08 19:59 -0700
Re: green stars "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 21:36 -0400
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-09 04:19 +0000
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-09 11:12 -0700
Re: green stars scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-09 14:05 +0000
Re: green stars "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 18:57 -0400
Re: green stars jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-06 13:34 +0000
Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 10:57 -0700
Re: green stars "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2015-10-04 10:41 -0400
Re: green stars wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-10-04 13:43 -0400
Re: green stars wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-10-02 22:38 -0400
Re: green stars Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-10-03 17:37 -0400
Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 14:52 -0700
Re: green stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:36 -0500
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-05 01:39 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-05 01:55 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-05 01:17 -0700
Re: green stars Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-10-05 14:04 -0400
Re: green stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 13:07 -0500
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-05 12:58 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-05 23:52 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 10:24 -0700
Re: green stars pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-06 11:39 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 12:35 -0700
Re: green stars pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-06 13:20 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 15:15 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 15:31 -0700
Re: green stars pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-06 15:58 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 23:12 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 23:34 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-07 00:49 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 21:24 -0700
Re: green stars "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 13:26 -0700
Re: green stars "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 09:58 -0700
Re: green stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 07:53 -0500
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
| From | Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-05 14:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jOCdnYUXCoskJo_LnZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #524616 |
On 05/10/2015 4:17 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > so, are you saying the true colors of stars is ....Green? Not all of them, and in fact in the case of the Sun, the peak occurs around the green, but there's still plenty of colours immediately around it, that are nearly as large as the peak. The Sun's colour works out to a pink colour. Yousuf Khan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-05 13:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <j-OdnWp2TKL8IY_LnZ2dnUU7-LWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #524694 |
On 10/5/15 1:04 PM, Yousuf Khan wrote: > > Not all of them, and in fact in the case of the Sun, the peak occurs > around the green, but there's still plenty of colours immediately around > it, that are nearly as large as the peak. I agree. > > The Sun's colour works out to a pink colour. > I disagree. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-05 12:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5612D679.77FF@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #524694 |
Yousuf Khan wrote: > > On 05/10/2015 4:17 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > so, are you saying the true colors of stars is ....Green? > > Not all of them, and in fact in the case of the Sun, the peak occurs > around the green, but there's still plenty of colours immediately around > it, that are nearly as large as the peak. > > The Sun's colour works out to a pink colour. > > Yousuf Khan My only explanation for the existences of stable green stars among fast moving red shifting stars shooting in all directions is the big bang occurred in a vicinity of preexisting stars. I'm going to have to re-write Science... and science fiction...and astronomy..and pyhsics! Throw your science books away, I'm re-writing your textbooks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-05 23:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <56136F95.21CB@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #524738 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Yousuf Khan wrote: > > > > On 05/10/2015 4:17 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > so, are you saying the true colors of stars is ....Green? > > > > Not all of them, and in fact in the case of the Sun, the peak occurs > > around the green, but there's still plenty of colours immediately around > > it, that are nearly as large as the peak. > > > > The Sun's colour works out to a pink colour. > > > > Yousuf Khan > > My only explanation > for the existences > of stable green stars among > fast moving red > shifting stars > shooting in all > directions is > the big bang occurred > in a vicinity > of preexisting stars. > > I'm going to have to re-write Science... > and science fiction...and astronomy..and > pyhsics! > > Throw your science books away, I'm re-writing your textbooks. That explains a lot if you look at it from a different point of view... it explains why the Moon has so many craters and the Earth which is next to it...doesn't. The Moon comes from an era 'before' the big bang, and got...banged up in the resulting explosion. In otherwords...you got all kinds of stuff in the universe that existed before the big bang. I wouldn't be surprised if Venus is older than our Sun! If you step back...you can probably see our universe is just in itself...a galaxy. The Galaxy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 10:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <561403D5.4FDA@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #524844 |
pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:52:02 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > it explains why the Moon has so many craters and the Earth which is next to it...doesn't. > > This can be completely explained with one word. Erosion. That is not an explaination, that's 'just a theory'. I'm giving 'explainations', not theories, my work is ...beyond science. People wants answers, not....guesses.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 11:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <de993273-7886-49f1-90a6-e7463c6b5086@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #524926 |
On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 10:24:45 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:52:02 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > it explains why the Moon has so many craters and the Earth which is next to it...doesn't. > > > > This can be completely explained with one word. Erosion. > > > That is not an explaination, that's 'just a theory'. > > I'm giving 'explainations', not theories, my work is ...beyond science. > > People wants answers, not....guesses. No, it is not a theory, it is not a guess, it is a fact. http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/craters/en/ "Three processes help Earth keep its surface crater free. The first is called erosion. Earth has weather, water, and plants. These act together to break apart and wear down the ground. Eventually erosion can break a crater down to virtually nothing." http://solarviews.com/eng/tercrate.htm "... On the Earth, however, which has been even more heavily impacted than the Moon, craters are continually erased by erosion and redeposition as well as by volcanic resurfacing and tectonic activity." You 'explanations' are incomprehensible garbage...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 12:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5614226E.1DB4@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #524926 |
pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 10:24:44 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:52:02 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > it explains why the Moon has so many craters and the Earth which is next to it...doesn't. > > > > > > This can be completely explained with one word. Erosion. > > > > > > That is not an explaination, that's 'just a theory'. > > > > I'm giving 'explainations', not theories, my work is ...beyond science. > > > > People wants answers, not....guesses. > > No, it is not a theory, it is not a guess, it is a fact. > > http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/craters/en/ > > "Three processes help Earth keep its surface crater free. The first is called erosion. Earth has weather, water, and plants. These act together to break apart and wear down the ground. Eventually erosion can break a crater down to virtually nothing." > > http://solarviews.com/eng/tercrate.htm > > "... On the Earth, however, which has been even more heavily impacted than the Moon, craters are continually erased by erosion and redeposition as well as by volcanic resurfacing and tectonic activity." > > You 'explanations' are incomprehensible garbage... I like the cartoons: http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/craters/en/ Why is it these 'socalledfacts' never have an authors name???? For the same reason why doctors where masks.... No author names... http://solarviews.com/eng/tercrate.htm If you're going to post lies on a web page, you don't want your name associated with it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 13:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <db452153-9c26-44af-b3a7-24d12bcf98bb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #524955 |
On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 12:35:17 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 10:24:44 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:52:02 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > it explains why the Moon has so many craters and the Earth which is next to it...doesn't. > > > > > > > > This can be completely explained with one word. Erosion. > > > > > > > > > That is not an explaination, that's 'just a theory'. > > > > > > I'm giving 'explainations', not theories, my work is ...beyond science. > > > > > > People wants answers, not....guesses. > > > > No, it is not a theory, it is not a guess, it is a fact. > > > > http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/craters/en/ > > > > "Three processes help Earth keep its surface crater free. The first is called erosion. Earth has weather, water, and plants. These act together to break apart and wear down the ground. Eventually erosion can break a crater down to virtually nothing." > > > > http://solarviews.com/eng/tercrate.htm > > > > "... On the Earth, however, which has been even more heavily impacted than the Moon, craters are continually erased by erosion and redeposition as well as by volcanic resurfacing and tectonic activity." > > > > You 'explanations' are incomprehensible garbage... > > > > I like the cartoons: > http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/craters/en/ > > Why is it these 'socalledfacts' never have an authors name???? > > For the same reason why doctors where masks.... > > > > No author names... > http://solarviews.com/eng/tercrate.htm I see your powers of observation are as poor as your science chops. You clearly didn't look very hard for the authors name, which is Calvin J. Hamilton, and the references he used are also there... "The information on this page was taken primarily from Koeberl and Sharpton. Koeberl, Christian and Virgil L. Sharpton. Terrestrial Impact Craters Slide Set. Lunar and Planetary Institute. Pilkington, M. and R. A. F. Grieve, "The Geophysical Signature of Terrestrial Impact Craters." Reviews of Geophysics, May 1992, vol. 30, pp. 161-181." > If you're going to post lies on a web page, you don't want your name associated with it. So, erosion is a lie?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 15:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <561447F7.5570@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #524964 |
pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 12:35:17 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 10:24:44 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:52:02 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > it explains why the Moon has so many craters and the Earth which is next to it...doesn't. > > > > > > > > > > This can be completely explained with one word. Erosion. > > > > > > > > > > > > That is not an explaination, that's 'just a theory'. > > > > > > > > I'm giving 'explainations', not theories, my work is ...beyond science. > > > > > > > > People wants answers, not....guesses. > > > > > > No, it is not a theory, it is not a guess, it is a fact. > > > > > > http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/craters/en/ > > > > > > "Three processes help Earth keep its surface crater free. The first is called erosion. Earth has weather, water, and plants. These act together to break apart and wear down the ground. Eventually erosion can break a crater down to virtually nothing." > > > > > > http://solarviews.com/eng/tercrate.htm > > > > > > "... On the Earth, however, which has been even more heavily impacted than the Moon, craters are continually erased by erosion and redeposition as well as by volcanic resurfacing and tectonic activity." > > > > > > You 'explanations' are incomprehensible garbage... > > > > > > > > I like the cartoons: > > http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/craters/en/ > > > > Why is it these 'socalledfacts' never have an authors name???? > > > > For the same reason why doctors where masks.... > > > > > > > > No author names... > > http://solarviews.com/eng/tercrate.htm > > I see your powers of observation are as poor as your science chops. You clearly didn't look very hard for the authors name, which is Calvin J. Hamilton, and the references he used are also there... > > "The information on this page was taken primarily from Koeberl and Sharpton. > > Koeberl, Christian and Virgil L. Sharpton. Terrestrial Impact Craters Slide Set. Lunar and Planetary Institute. > > Pilkington, M. and R. A. F. Grieve, "The Geophysical Signature of Terrestrial Impact Craters." Reviews of Geophysics, May 1992, vol. 30, pp. 161-181." > > > If you're going to post lies on a web page, you don't want your name associated with it. > > So, erosion is a lie? I don't know of any 'erosion' that exist that works on craters only. "However, we would like to caution against just using images or remote sensing to identify impact craters on Earth without corroborating petrographic and geochemical studies on crater rocks. Only such studies can provide confirming evidence that a geological structure is of impact origin." Translation: There is no confirming evidence a geological structure is of impact origin. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/slidesets/craters/ "Introduction Impact cratering research has gained attention throughout the world following the suggestion..." "suggestion"???? Sounds like 'just a theory'. Now you guys are saying that it wasn't a asteroid that killed the dinosaurs but a vocano....and a asteroid (just to keep the asteroid boys happy). http://www.futurity.org/asteroids-volcanoes-dinosaurs-1018262/ http://news.sciencemag.org/climate/2015/10/volcanoes-and-asteroid-strike-may-have-done-dinosaurs I told you guys what killed all the dinosaurs already...they simply ran out of girl dinosaurs. There weren't that many chicks around...and they were ugly and smelly...stinky. Now today girls wear makeup and perfume. but they are still ugly and stinky....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 15:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <56144BB5.69E2@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #524977 |
i mean, come on already.... just because something on the surface of the earth 'looks like a impact crater' doesn't mean that is what it is. I got a potatoe chip that looks like it has impact craters on it... Did a asteroid impact my potatoe chip?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 15:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f458054d-9e57-4888-b80e-dc697c797a2a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #524982 |
On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 3:31:22 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > i mean, come on already.... > just because something > on the surface of the earth > 'looks like a impact crater' > doesn't mean that is what > it is. > > I got a > potatoe chip > that looks like > it has impact craters > on it... > Did a asteroid impact > my potatoe chip? True enough. However... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_impact_craters_on_Earth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 23:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5614B7CE.4888@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #524989 |
pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 3:31:22 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > i mean, come on already.... > > just because something > > on the surface of the earth > > 'looks like a impact crater' > > doesn't mean that is what > > it is. > > > > I got a > > potatoe chip > > that looks like > > it has impact craters > > on it... > > Did a asteroid impact > > my potatoe chip? > > True enough. However... > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_impact_craters_on_Earth Okay, lets start with North America... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_impact_craters_in_North_America Sure a lot of craters listed in Canada! I would think with all that terrible weather they have it would have...eroded all by now. Why did they all go to Canada???? So, let's look at the first one listed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bow_City_impact_crater it first reads: The Bow City Impact Crater is a probable meteorite impact crater ... "probable"???? watdoesdatmean??? soundslikesciencelingofor...idon'tknowidon'tknowidon'tknow. I click on Reference: http://www.wired.com/2012/12/buried-bow-city-impact-crater/ "An extraterrestrial impact crater is hiding near a Canadian ghost town....and is invisible unless you’ve got seismic superpowers." Does *anyone* need to bother going further? You would have to be a looney bird...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 23:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5614BCE3.2BD6@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #524844 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Yousuf Khan wrote: > > > > > > On 05/10/2015 4:17 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > so, are you saying the true colors of stars is ....Green? > > > > > > Not all of them, and in fact in the case of the Sun, the peak occurs > > > around the green, but there's still plenty of colours immediately around > > > it, that are nearly as large as the peak. > > > > > > The Sun's colour works out to a pink colour. > > > > > > Yousuf Khan > > > > My only explanation > > for the existences > > of stable green stars among > > fast moving red > > shifting stars > > shooting in all > > directions is > > the big bang occurred > > in a vicinity > > of preexisting stars. > > > > I'm going to have to re-write Science... > > and science fiction...and astronomy..and > > pyhsics! > > > > Throw your science books away, I'm re-writing your textbooks. > > That explains a lot if you look at it from a different point of view... > > it explains why the Moon has so many craters and the Earth which is next to it...doesn't. > > The Moon comes from an era 'before' the big bang, and got...banged up in the resulting explosion. > > In otherwords...you got all kinds of stuff in the universe that existed before the big bang. > > I wouldn't be surprised if Venus is older than our Sun! > > If you step back...you can probably see our universe is just in itself...a galaxy. The Galaxy. did i spel astronomy wrong?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 00:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5614CE91.4A9F@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #525040 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > Yousuf Khan wrote: > > > > > > > > On 05/10/2015 4:17 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > so, are you saying the true colors of stars is ....Green? > > > > > > > > Not all of them, and in fact in the case of the Sun, the peak occurs > > > > around the green, but there's still plenty of colours immediately around > > > > it, that are nearly as large as the peak. > > > > > > > > The Sun's colour works out to a pink colour. > > > > > > > > Yousuf Khan > > > > > > My only explanation > > > for the existences > > > of stable green stars among > > > fast moving red > > > shifting stars > > > shooting in all > > > directions is > > > the big bang occurred > > > in a vicinity > > > of preexisting stars. > > > > > > I'm going to have to re-write Science... > > > and science fiction...and astronomy..and > > > pyhsics! > > > > > > Throw your science books away, I'm re-writing your textbooks. > > > > That explains a lot if you look at it from a different point of view... > > > > it explains why the Moon has so many craters and the Earth which is next to it...doesn't. > > > > The Moon comes from an era 'before' the big bang, and got...banged up in the resulting explosion. > > > > In otherwords...you got all kinds of stuff in the universe that existed before the big bang. > > > > I wouldn't be surprised if Venus is older than our Sun! > > > > If you step back...you can probably see our universe is just in itself...a galaxy. The Galaxy. > > did i spel astronomy wrong? maybe the green stars are at the antiuniverse...where all the antineutrinos hang out. I mean, you cannot have The Galaxy without an antiuniverse.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 21:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5617418E.6394@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #525043 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > Yousuf Khan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 05/10/2015 4:17 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > so, are you saying the true colors of stars is ....Green? > > > > > > > > > > Not all of them, and in fact in the case of the Sun, the peak occurs > > > > > around the green, but there's still plenty of colours immediately around > > > > > it, that are nearly as large as the peak. > > > > > > > > > > The Sun's colour works out to a pink colour. > > > > > > > > > > Yousuf Khan > > > > > > > > My only explanation > > > > for the existences > > > > of stable green stars among > > > > fast moving red > > > > shifting stars > > > > shooting in all > > > > directions is > > > > the big bang occurred > > > > in a vicinity > > > > of preexisting stars. > > > > > > > > I'm going to have to re-write Science... > > > > and science fiction...and astronomy..and > > > > pyhsics! > > > > > > > > Throw your science books away, I'm re-writing your textbooks. > > > > > > That explains a lot if you look at it from a different point of view... > > > > > > it explains why the Moon has so many craters and the Earth which is next to it...doesn't. > > > > > > The Moon comes from an era 'before' the big bang, and got...banged up in the resulting explosion. > > > > > > In otherwords...you got all kinds of stuff in the universe that existed before the big bang. > > > > > > I wouldn't be surprised if Venus is older than our Sun! > > > > > > If you step back...you can probably see our universe is just in itself...a galaxy. The Galaxy. > > > > did i spel astronomy wrong? > > maybe the green stars are at the antiuniverse...where all the > antineutrinos hang out. > > I mean, you cannot have The Galaxy without an antiuniverse. I expect any day a phone call, and a man with a switish accent telling me "You won The Nobell Prize for Astro-Physics!!!" I solved the origin of the universe problem! wats next?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 13:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <78496221-328f-41b5-944c-a6abdacfe55c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #524213 |
On Friday, October 2, 2015 at 1:17:03 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > Now, I know this is differcult > for yous to understand... > > you should be able to take a picture > of the universe and see a half second > of after the big bang... > you would be able to see stars > and galaxies 'moving' in all directions > from 'the center' of the big bang. > > A color photo would be shown as > red stars moving and galaxies, and green stars stable... > > > i'm not sure what are the green stars, ..it's a mystery to me. > > (science hasn't caught up with me yet so I'm confronted > with the mysteries first.) Big bang came and went.Best it left on birth was space energy.Its 2.7K TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 09:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4ee3e67c-44fa-46b7-b2af-41a5dc4229ce@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #524282 |
On Friday, October 2, 2015 at 1:26:07 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > On Friday, October 2, 2015 at 1:17:03 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > Now, I know this is differcult > > for yous to understand... > > > > you should be able to take a picture > > of the universe and see a half second > > of after the big bang... > > you would be able to see stars > > and galaxies 'moving' in all directions > > from 'the center' of the big bang. > > > > A color photo would be shown as > > red stars moving and galaxies, and green stars stable... > > > > > > i'm not sure what are the green stars, ..it's a mystery to me. > > > > (science hasn't caught up with me yet so I'm confronted > > with the mysteries first.) > > Big bang came and went.Best it left on birth was space energy.Its 2.7K TreBert Is the Sun a white,yellow or violet star? Stars would be all gamma photons if they came directly to Earth from the Sunś core.TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 07:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <b4qdnYyOEsz9vIzLnZ2dnUU7-LednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #524213 |
Different temperature resutlst in different color for human eyes > http://www.mhhe.com/physsci/astronomy/fix/student/images/07f06.jpg -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web