Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #512700 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-11 09:58 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-12 12:35 +0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 266 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-11 09:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-11 10:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 13:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-11 23:26 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 00:24 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-11 13:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 07:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 19:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 04:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 20:57 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 12:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 15:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 15:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 12:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 20:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-12 17:49 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-12 18:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-13 00:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:25 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-12 20:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-12 19:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 20:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-12 19:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:53 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 23:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 15:56 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:25 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-13 06:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-13 14:20 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:39 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 23:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 16:15 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:30 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 09:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:30 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 10:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-14 14:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-15 05:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:25 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 19:46 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 11:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 10:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 22:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:15 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-16 22:04 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 15:15 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-17 00:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:22 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 12:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-17 10:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:28 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 12:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 18:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 18:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 06:45 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 20:35 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 12:47 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 01:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:36 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:30 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 10:08 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 11:40 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 14:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-16 01:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 19:53 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-16 14:58 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 10:52 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 19:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 18:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:33 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:26 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 20:41 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:44 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 05:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:10 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-22 03:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:26 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-23 21:17 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:51 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 08:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-18 18:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-17 13:21 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 19:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-17 13:40 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 12:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 00:51 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 14:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 21:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 00:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 23:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:12 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 19:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:45 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:43 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-13 15:53 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:24 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-14 12:08 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-14 14:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-14 04:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-14 12:53 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-14 06:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-14 14:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 07:51 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> - 2015-08-15 06:41 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 16:11 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-15 03:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-15 07:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-15 12:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-15 18:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 00:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 01:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 01:09 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 14:06 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 06:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 12:12 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 03:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 21:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 02:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-18 14:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 18:47 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 10:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-19 00:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-19 09:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 05:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-21 00:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-21 13:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 17:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-22 00:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-22 03:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-22 12:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:28 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:04 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 06:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:16 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 19:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:51 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:55 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 20:59 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 05:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:30 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-21 19:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 17:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 07:47 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-22 03:40 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:19 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-23 21:20 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 17:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 00:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-15 15:17 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:31 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-15 12:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:36 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 03:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:11 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 11:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 10:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 12:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 12:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 12:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 14:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 19:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:33 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:34 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 09:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-13 13:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 13:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-16 01:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:24 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-16 10:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:01 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2015-08-16 16:55 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:11 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-17 13:39 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 12:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-18 11:55 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:10 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 14:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 21:41 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 15:08 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 20:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 15:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 07:29 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 21:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-11 20:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 04:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 16:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 09:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:18 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-14 03:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:25 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-15 05:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-11 12:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-11 12:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 19:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 04:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 12:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-12 20:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 21:20 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> - 2015-08-12 10:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 21:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-11 20:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 21:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 14:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2015-08-12 12:35 +0800
Page 5 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 14 Next page →
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 05:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <53qdta53m563c5sf1n46vlekejo9a023br@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515442 |
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:11:05 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <ih9ctalcbfnt9vhgm2be2tr49b4jhcumiv@4ax.com> wrote: >On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 04:56:46 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:23:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><se0atatjtci96j7u46mm4ch5kk9qjippb4@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:30:53 +0000 (UTC), Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>niunian wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The definition of God as the living source and energy of all living things. >>>> >>>>Occam's Razor violation by adding an unnecessary and unsupported >>>>function to deities. >>>> >>>>Gods are spirits detected by that small percentage of the population who >>>>have direct personal observation of the spirits of the world. The >>>>majority has always had no direct personal observation of the spirits if >>>>the world so some take their existence on faith others disbelieve. >>> >>>>God as a singluar being is a second Occam's razor violation. >>> >>>God is creator of all things. > >>You have yet to offer any unambiguous and direct evidence any god ever >>existed. > >At this stage, what I would have to offer is totally over your head. > You do tend to pile it higher and deeper but I can hold my breath and get a ladder. And a shovel. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 14:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8bihtadv49h557d3h9p8mbnn2umk7nv5hh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515520 |
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 05:00:21 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:11:05 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><ih9ctalcbfnt9vhgm2be2tr49b4jhcumiv@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 04:56:46 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:23:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><se0atatjtci96j7u46mm4ch5kk9qjippb4@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:30:53 +0000 (UTC), Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>niunian wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The definition of God as the living source and energy of all living things. >>>>> >>>>>Occam's Razor violation by adding an unnecessary and unsupported >>>>>function to deities. >>>>> >>>>>Gods are spirits detected by that small percentage of the population who >>>>>have direct personal observation of the spirits of the world. The >>>>>majority has always had no direct personal observation of the spirits if >>>>>the world so some take their existence on faith others disbelieve. >>>> >>>>>God as a singluar being is a second Occam's razor violation. >>>> >>>>God is creator of all things. >> >>>You have yet to offer any unambiguous and direct evidence any god ever >>>existed. >> >>At this stage, what I would have to offer is totally over your head. >You do tend to pile it higher and deeper but I can hold my breath and >get a ladder. And a shovel. You're in a hole. Where are you going to get a ladder and a shovel? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 03:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ptuita5c6iamfmv34399clveq3q1ibik5t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515832 |
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 14:12:09 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <8bihtadv49h557d3h9p8mbnn2umk7nv5hh@4ax.com> wrote: >On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 05:00:21 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:11:05 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><ih9ctalcbfnt9vhgm2be2tr49b4jhcumiv@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 04:56:46 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:23:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><se0atatjtci96j7u46mm4ch5kk9qjippb4@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:30:53 +0000 (UTC), Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>niunian wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The definition of God as the living source and energy of all living things. >>>>>> >>>>>>Occam's Razor violation by adding an unnecessary and unsupported >>>>>>function to deities. >>>>>> >>>>>>Gods are spirits detected by that small percentage of the population who >>>>>>have direct personal observation of the spirits of the world. The >>>>>>majority has always had no direct personal observation of the spirits if >>>>>>the world so some take their existence on faith others disbelieve. >>>>> >>>>>>God as a singluar being is a second Occam's razor violation. >>>>> >>>>>God is creator of all things. >>> >>>>You have yet to offer any unambiguous and direct evidence any god ever >>>>existed. >>> >>>At this stage, what I would have to offer is totally over your head. > >>You do tend to pile it higher and deeper but I can hold my breath and >>get a ladder. And a shovel. > >You're in a hole. Not at all. > Where are you going to get a ladder and a shovel? > The same place you got your god. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 10:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sarjtadalabjesdhv3q5i1qohoqa4a0bjl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516003 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 03:53:00 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 14:12:09 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><8bihtadv49h557d3h9p8mbnn2umk7nv5hh@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 05:00:21 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:11:05 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><ih9ctalcbfnt9vhgm2be2tr49b4jhcumiv@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 04:56:46 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:23:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><se0atatjtci96j7u46mm4ch5kk9qjippb4@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:30:53 +0000 (UTC), Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>niunian wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The definition of God as the living source and energy of all living things. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Occam's Razor violation by adding an unnecessary and unsupported >>>>>>>function to deities. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Gods are spirits detected by that small percentage of the population who >>>>>>>have direct personal observation of the spirits of the world. The >>>>>>>majority has always had no direct personal observation of the spirits if >>>>>>>the world so some take their existence on faith others disbelieve. >>>>>> >>>>>>>God as a singluar being is a second Occam's razor violation. >>>>>> >>>>>>God is creator of all things. >>>> >>>>>You have yet to offer any unambiguous and direct evidence any god ever >>>>>existed. >>>> >>>>At this stage, what I would have to offer is totally over your head. >> >>>You do tend to pile it higher and deeper but I can hold my breath and >>>get a ladder. And a shovel. >> >>You're in a hole. > >Not at all. You just accepted that you were. >> Where are you going to get a ladder and a shovel? >> > >The same place you got your god. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 16:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <cucktap7p83rcnckm0loasjh592e85fd1c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516103 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:57:56 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <sarjtadalabjesdhv3q5i1qohoqa4a0bjl@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>niunian wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The definition of God as the living source and energy of all living things. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Occam's Razor violation by adding an unnecessary and unsupported >>>>>>>>function to deities. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Gods are spirits detected by that small percentage of the population who >>>>>>>>have direct personal observation of the spirits of the world. The >>>>>>>>majority has always had no direct personal observation of the spirits if >>>>>>>>the world so some take their existence on faith others disbelieve. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>God as a singluar being is a second Occam's razor violation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>God is creator of all things. >>>>> >>>>>>You have yet to offer any unambiguous and direct evidence any god ever >>>>>>existed. >>>>> >>>>>At this stage, what I would have to offer is totally over your head. >>> >>>>You do tend to pile it higher and deeper but I can hold my breath and >>>>get a ladder. And a shovel. >>> >>>You're in a hole. >> >>Not at all. > >You just accepted that you were. Amusing. I was discussing what you pile so high and deep. That smelly stuff. > >>> Where are you going to get a ladder and a shovel? >>> >> >>The same place you got your god. > No snappy comeback? -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 01:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mqp6u5$ah8$1@panix2.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #513481 |
In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: > On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >> >>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >> >> Um, what definition is that? > > By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the > world of death. And what definition is _that_? -- wds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 19:53 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqpth7$jil$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #514136 |
On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: > In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, > niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: > >> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>> >>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>> >>> Um, what definition is that? >> >> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >> world of death. > > And what definition is _that_? It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of living will cease to exist. > > -- wds >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 14:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <d3bj8sFag85U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #514200 |
On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: > On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >> >>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>> >>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>> >>>> Um, what definition is that? >>> >>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>> world of death. >> >> And what definition is _that_? > > It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all > living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of > living will cease to exist. <looks around> No god, and everything is still here...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 10:52 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqri7d$uc4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #514275 |
On 2015-08-16 09:58 PM, Alex W. wrote: > On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>> >>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>> >>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>> >>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>> >>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>> world of death. >>> >>> And what definition is _that_? >> >> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >> living will cease to exist. > > <looks around> > > No god, and everything is still here... The God of living is from within, not without. So stop looking around, there is nothing you can see with your eyes or hear with your ears. It's called a realization from the within.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 05:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <itb3tapsfbkti28g2cgndc14k19p0dkfda@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514529 |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:52:33 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <mqri7d$uc4$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >On 2015-08-16 09:58 PM, Alex W. wrote: >> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>> >>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>> >>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>> world of death. >>>> >>>> And what definition is _that_? >>> >>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >>> living will cease to exist. >> >> <looks around> >> >> No god, and everything is still here... > >The God of living is from within, not without. So stop looking around, >there is nothing you can see with your eyes or hear with your ears. It's >called a realization from the within. It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 19:49 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqsjdi$7bt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #514596 |
On 2015-08-17 05:56 PM, Attila < wrote: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:52:33 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in > alt.atheism with message-id <mqri7d$uc4$1@dont-email.me> wrote: > >> On 2015-08-16 09:58 PM, Alex W. wrote: >>> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>>> >>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>>> world of death. >>>>> >>>>> And what definition is _that_? >>>> >>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >>>> living will cease to exist. >>> >>> <looks around> >>> >>> No god, and everything is still here... >> >> The God of living is from within, not without. So stop looking around, >> there is nothing you can see with your eyes or hear with your ears. It's >> called a realization from the within. > > It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. Why？ Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was from the within? > > -- > Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. > > Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially > those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. > > Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government > guaranteed above average income for every person. > > Every illegal alien is a criminal. > No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. > Deportation upon identification as the only option. > > If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly > before you run into me. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 18:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <v7p4talkqbn8j31s961hmht11oikhaoek8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514615 |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:49:19 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <mqsjdi$7bt$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >On 2015-08-17 05:56 PM, Attila < wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:52:33 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >> alt.atheism with message-id <mqri7d$uc4$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-08-16 09:58 PM, Alex W. wrote: >>>> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >>>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>>>> world of death. >>>>>> >>>>>> And what definition is _that_? >>>>> >>>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>>>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >>>>> living will cease to exist. >>>> >>>> <looks around> >>>> >>>> No god, and everything is still here... >>> >>> The God of living is from within, not without. So stop looking around, >>> there is nothing you can see with your eyes or hear with your ears. It's >>> called a realization from the within. >> >> It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. > >Why? Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was >from the within? I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 13:33 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqujaa$gfe$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #514911 |
On 2015-08-18 06:50 AM, Attila < wrote: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:49:19 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in > alt.atheism with message-id <mqsjdi$7bt$1@dont-email.me> wrote: > >> On 2015-08-17 05:56 PM, Attila < wrote: >>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:52:33 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >>> alt.atheism with message-id <mqri7d$uc4$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-08-16 09:58 PM, Alex W. wrote: >>>>> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >>>>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>>>>> world of death. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And what definition is _that_? >>>>>> >>>>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>>>>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >>>>>> living will cease to exist. >>>>> >>>>> <looks around> >>>>> >>>>> No god, and everything is still here... >>>> >>>> The God of living is from within, not without. So stop looking around, >>>> there is nothing you can see with your eyes or hear with your ears. It's >>>> called a realization from the within. >>> >>> It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. >> >> Why? Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was >>from the within? > > I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. I'm afraid your physical eyes can not see the spiritual world the same way your physical science can not prove or disprove philosophy. The spiritual existence is beyond the ability of your physical eyes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 03:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5fn5tahgjehhh0o2ip3hbkffu90qvri5m8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514993 |
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:33:08 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <mqujaa$gfe$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>> It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. >>> >>> Why? Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was >>>from the within? >> >> I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. > >I'm afraid your physical eyes can not see the spiritual world the same >way your physical science can not prove or disprove philosophy. The >spiritual existence is beyond the ability of your physical eyes. As I said, I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. That still holds true. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 07:26 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mr0hqp$2h7$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #514999 |
On 2015-08-18 03:26 PM, Attila < wrote: > On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:33:08 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in > alt.atheism with message-id <mqujaa$gfe$1@dont-email.me> wrote: > >>>>> It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. >>>> >>>> Why? Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was >>> >from the within? >>> >>> I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. >> >> I'm afraid your physical eyes can not see the spiritual world the same >> way your physical science can not prove or disprove philosophy. The >> spiritual existence is beyond the ability of your physical eyes. > > As I said, I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever > existed. That still holds true. I'm afraid no one can force you to see what you don't want to see.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 04:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <4sf8tap9a9com2ur4ta9ro498p65vl0frl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515143 |
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:26:37 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <mr0hqp$2h7$2@dont-email.me> wrote: >On 2015-08-18 03:26 PM, Attila < wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:33:08 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >> alt.atheism with message-id <mqujaa$gfe$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >> >>>>>> It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. >>>>> >>>>> Why? Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was >>>> >from the within? >>>> >>>> I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. >>> >>> I'm afraid your physical eyes can not see the spiritual world the same >>> way your physical science can not prove or disprove philosophy. The >>> spiritual existence is beyond the ability of your physical eyes. >> >> As I said, I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever >> existed. That still holds true. > >I'm afraid no one can force you to see what you don't want to see. But history shows that isn't from a lack of trying. For most of history I would have long since been executed for heresy. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 20:41 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mr202n$ikl$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #515180 |
On 2015-08-19 04:35 PM, Attila < wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:26:37 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in > alt.atheism with message-id <mr0hqp$2h7$2@dont-email.me> wrote: > >> On 2015-08-18 03:26 PM, Attila < wrote: >>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:33:08 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >>> alt.atheism with message-id <mqujaa$gfe$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why? Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was >>>>> >from the within? >>>>> >>>>> I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. >>>> >>>> I'm afraid your physical eyes can not see the spiritual world the same >>>> way your physical science can not prove or disprove philosophy. The >>>> spiritual existence is beyond the ability of your physical eyes. >>> >>> As I said, I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever >>> existed. That still holds true. >> >> I'm afraid no one can force you to see what you don't want to see. > > But history shows that isn't from a lack of trying. For most of > history I would have long since been executed for heresy. Irrelevant. Are you suggesting you are playing some kind of hero in here by being wilfully blind?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 04:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <vi5btal4pmc4pcmcbn5en5rqrco730i6lr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515205 |
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:41:05 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <mr202n$ikl$4@dont-email.me> wrote: >On 2015-08-19 04:35 PM, Attila < wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:26:37 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >> alt.atheism with message-id <mr0hqp$2h7$2@dont-email.me> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-08-18 03:26 PM, Attila < wrote: >>>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:33:08 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >>>> alt.atheism with message-id <mqujaa$gfe$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>> It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why? Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was >>>>>> >from the within? >>>>>> >>>>>> I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. >>>>> >>>>> I'm afraid your physical eyes can not see the spiritual world the same >>>>> way your physical science can not prove or disprove philosophy. The >>>>> spiritual existence is beyond the ability of your physical eyes. >>>> >>>> As I said, I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever >>>> existed. That still holds true. >>> >>> I'm afraid no one can force you to see what you don't want to see. >> >> But history shows that isn't from a lack of trying. For most of >> history I would have long since been executed for heresy. > >Irrelevant. Are you suggesting you are playing some kind of hero in here >by being wilfully blind? > > Not at all. It would be a bit difficult to do anything to me since I am not here physically. I am far from blind. I simply have not been brainwashed to accept that which has no supporting evidence. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 22:44 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mr4p1l$2oe$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #515381 |
On 2015-08-20 04:58 PM, Attila < wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:41:05 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in > alt.atheism with message-id <mr202n$ikl$4@dont-email.me> wrote: > >> On 2015-08-19 04:35 PM, Attila < wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:26:37 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >>> alt.atheism with message-id <mr0hqp$2h7$2@dont-email.me> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-08-18 03:26 PM, Attila < wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:33:08 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >>>>> alt.atheism with message-id <mqujaa$gfe$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>> It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why? Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was >>>>>>> >from the within? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm afraid your physical eyes can not see the spiritual world the same >>>>>> way your physical science can not prove or disprove philosophy. The >>>>>> spiritual existence is beyond the ability of your physical eyes. >>>>> >>>>> As I said, I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever >>>>> existed. That still holds true. >>>> >>>> I'm afraid no one can force you to see what you don't want to see. >>> >>> But history shows that isn't from a lack of trying. For most of >>> history I would have long since been executed for heresy. >> >> Irrelevant. Are you suggesting you are playing some kind of hero in here >> by being wilfully blind? >> >> > > Not at all. It would be a bit difficult to do anything to me since I > am not here physically. > > I am far from blind. I simply have not been brainwashed to accept > that which has no supporting evidence. > And yet, you don't appear to be able to understand my rather simple philosophical point of view. To me, that counts as wilful blindness on your part.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 05:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <m5qdtatq3aj72102pnfn39g7lhv6oj4gte@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515404 |
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:44:13 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <mr4p1l$2oe$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >On 2015-08-20 04:58 PM, Attila < wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:41:05 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >> alt.atheism with message-id <mr202n$ikl$4@dont-email.me> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-08-19 04:35 PM, Attila < wrote: >>>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:26:37 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >>>> alt.atheism with message-id <mr0hqp$2h7$2@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-08-18 03:26 PM, Attila < wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:33:08 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id <mqujaa$gfe$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why? Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was >>>>>>>> >from the within? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm afraid your physical eyes can not see the spiritual world the same >>>>>>> way your physical science can not prove or disprove philosophy. The >>>>>>> spiritual existence is beyond the ability of your physical eyes. >>>>>> >>>>>> As I said, I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever >>>>>> existed. That still holds true. >>>>> >>>>> I'm afraid no one can force you to see what you don't want to see. >>>> >>>> But history shows that isn't from a lack of trying. For most of >>>> history I would have long since been executed for heresy. >>> >>> Irrelevant. Are you suggesting you are playing some kind of hero in here >>> by being wilfully blind? >>> >>> >> >> Not at all. It would be a bit difficult to do anything to me since I >> am not here physically. >> >> I am far from blind. I simply have not been brainwashed to accept >> that which has no supporting evidence. >> > >And yet, you don't appear to be able to understand my rather simple >philosophical point of view. To me, that counts as wilful blindness on >your part. You are free to count anything whatever you like. That has nothing to do with either accuracy or reality. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web