Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #510076 > unrolled thread
| Started by | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-07-30 04:10 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 330 — 29 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-29 03:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 07:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:17 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 09:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 19:33 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 10:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-02 11:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 12:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 12:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-02 14:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 15:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 16:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-02 10:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-03 03:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-03 09:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-03 18:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-04 15:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-03 17:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-04 18:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-05 12:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-06 19:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-06 17:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 01:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 20:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 22:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-07 09:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 16:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-08 04:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 08:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 14:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-08 18:12 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 08:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-08 14:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 14:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 00:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 12:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-07 15:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-07 15:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 12:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 13:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-16 12:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-20 12:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-20 17:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 13:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-23 16:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 08:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-21 06:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-08-21 10:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-21 11:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-08-21 16:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-21 17:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 17:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 14:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 03:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 07:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 05:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-23 05:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:31 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 05:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-24 03:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 20:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-23 17:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 18:09 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 07:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 13:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 11:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 11:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 12:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 11:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 13:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 16:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. RedAcer <rredacer@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 14:57 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-24 07:02 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. RedAcer <rredacer@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 15:13 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. RedAcer <rredacer@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 10:44 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-25 09:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 05:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-24 03:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 20:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-24 17:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 20:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-25 16:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 03:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-26 10:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 16:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 07:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-27 16:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 15:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-29 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 07:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 09:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 10:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-29 22:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 09:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-31 05:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 07:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 10:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-09-01 02:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 10:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-09-03 04:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 14:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-22 12:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-24 17:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 07:41 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-25 16:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-29 07:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-29 16:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 09:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 09:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-23 11:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-24 17:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 04:40 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-24 17:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 07:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-25 16:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-25 18:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 00:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 07:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-26 10:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 07:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 08:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 15:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-28 15:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-28 18:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 07:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 07:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 06:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 07:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-29 05:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 09:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-30 10:48 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 10:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 11:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-29 07:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 10:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 13:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 11:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 11:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 12:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 11:04 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 13:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 13:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-24 17:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 07:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-04 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-16 12:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> - 2015-08-18 19:04 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 12:33 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2015-08-19 18:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 21:52 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 08:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-21 21:55 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 10:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-21 23:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 12:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 01:28 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-21 09:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 17:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-24 17:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 20:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-25 15:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 03:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-26 10:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 16:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 06:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-27 16:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-29 11:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-29 13:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-29 18:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-30 06:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-30 11:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-31 04:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:19 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-31 12:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 21:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 00:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-31 22:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 22:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 01:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-01 12:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:10 -0400
Page 8 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 17 Next page →
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 05:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-2A7FE0.05432723082015@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516055 |
In article <charlie-gordon1492-790244.05135823082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: > In article <vddjtad74h5h28oemmj9d8ce6bkp127s8c@4ax.com>, > Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > > > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 03:34:05 -0700, je suis charly > > <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: > > > > >In article <njuita9f87497pbi4rikth6vi7au7o1dga@4ax.com>, > > > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > > > > >> >What's equally difficult is to imagine the creation of the universe all > > >> >by > > >> >it's > > >> >own self. > > >> > > >> What evidence do you have that the universe was ever created? > > > > > >Because it is here? > > > > How is that "evidence" that it was created, imbecile? > > Because it is not a void. How is THAT evidence that it was created? -- JD Išve officially given up trying to find the bottom of the barrel that is Republican depravity.--Jidyom Rosario, Addicting Info
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 10:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-9B23D8.10315523082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #516066 |
In article <hlwdjsd2-2A7FE0.05432723082015@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: > In article > <charlie-gordon1492-790244.05135823082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>, > je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: > > > In article <vddjtad74h5h28oemmj9d8ce6bkp127s8c@4ax.com>, > > Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 03:34:05 -0700, je suis charly > > > <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: > > > > > > >In article <njuita9f87497pbi4rikth6vi7au7o1dga@4ax.com>, > > > > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > > > > > > >> >What's equally difficult is to imagine the creation of the universe > > > >> >all > > > >> >by > > > >> >it's > > > >> >own self. > > > >> > > > >> What evidence do you have that the universe was ever created? > > > > > > > >Because it is here? > > > > > > How is that "evidence" that it was created, imbecile? > > > > Because it is not a void. > > How is THAT evidence that it was created? Because it was not and then it is. That is generally refered to as a creation. Like when wind shear creates tornadoes. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 16:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <2mcktal5u3mvghc93m3uv259co6tha9fti@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516149 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:31:55 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id <charlie-gordon1492-9B23D8.10315523082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> wrote: >In article <hlwdjsd2-2A7FE0.05432723082015@news.giganews.com>, > Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: > >> In article >> <charlie-gordon1492-790244.05135823082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>, >> je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >> >> > In article <vddjtad74h5h28oemmj9d8ce6bkp127s8c@4ax.com>, >> > Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> > >> > > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 03:34:05 -0700, je suis charly >> > > <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >> > > >> > > >In article <njuita9f87497pbi4rikth6vi7au7o1dga@4ax.com>, >> > > > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> >What's equally difficult is to imagine the creation of the universe >> > > >> >all >> > > >> >by >> > > >> >it's >> > > >> >own self. >> > > >> >> > > >> What evidence do you have that the universe was ever created? >> > > > >> > > >Because it is here? >> > > >> > > How is that "evidence" that it was created, imbecile? >> > >> > Because it is not a void. >> >> How is THAT evidence that it was created? > >Because it was not and then it is. That is generally refered to as a creation. >Like when wind shear creates tornadoes. Where is your evidence that it ever was not? -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 14:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-207C1E.14380823082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #516271 |
In article <2mcktal5u3mvghc93m3uv259co6tha9fti@4ax.com>, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:31:55 -0700, je suis charly > <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id > <charlie-gordon1492-9B23D8.10315523082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> > wrote: > > >In article <hlwdjsd2-2A7FE0.05432723082015@news.giganews.com>, > > Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: > > > >> In article > >> <charlie-gordon1492-790244.05135823082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>, > >> je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: > >> > >> > In article <vddjtad74h5h28oemmj9d8ce6bkp127s8c@4ax.com>, > >> > Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >> > > >> > > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 03:34:05 -0700, je suis charly > >> > > <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > >In article <njuita9f87497pbi4rikth6vi7au7o1dga@4ax.com>, > >> > > > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> >What's equally difficult is to imagine the creation of the > >> > > >> >universe > >> > > >> >all > >> > > >> >by > >> > > >> >it's > >> > > >> >own self. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> What evidence do you have that the universe was ever created? > >> > > > > >> > > >Because it is here? > >> > > > >> > > How is that "evidence" that it was created, imbecile? > >> > > >> > Because it is not a void. > >> > >> How is THAT evidence that it was created? > > > >Because it was not and then it is. That is generally refered to as a > >creation. > >Like when wind shear creates tornadoes. > > Where is your evidence that it ever was not? Cosmic background radiation? Sorry, but some sort of Big Bang is the current accepted theory in physics. I realize that some of you find science and physics frightful, but they really are remarkable tools for advancing technology. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 05:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <9fnltad2dpu26tt5lno98eq1hu3nktngtc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516296 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 14:38:08 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id <charlie-gordon1492-207C1E.14380823082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> wrote: >In article <2mcktal5u3mvghc93m3uv259co6tha9fti@4ax.com>, > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:31:55 -0700, je suis charly >> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id >> <charlie-gordon1492-9B23D8.10315523082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> >> wrote: >> >> >In article <hlwdjsd2-2A7FE0.05432723082015@news.giganews.com>, >> > Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> In article >> >> <charlie-gordon1492-790244.05135823082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>, >> >> je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >> >> >> >> > In article <vddjtad74h5h28oemmj9d8ce6bkp127s8c@4ax.com>, >> >> > Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 03:34:05 -0700, je suis charly >> >> > > <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > >In article <njuita9f87497pbi4rikth6vi7au7o1dga@4ax.com>, >> >> > > > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >What's equally difficult is to imagine the creation of the >> >> > > >> >universe >> >> > > >> >all >> >> > > >> >by >> >> > > >> >it's >> >> > > >> >own self. >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> What evidence do you have that the universe was ever created? >> >> > > > >> >> > > >Because it is here? >> >> > > >> >> > > How is that "evidence" that it was created, imbecile? >> >> > >> >> > Because it is not a void. >> >> >> >> How is THAT evidence that it was created? >> > >> >Because it was not and then it is. That is generally refered to as a >> >creation. >> >Like when wind shear creates tornadoes. >> >> Where is your evidence that it ever was not? > >Cosmic background radiation? Sorry, but some sort of Big Bang is the current >accepted theory in physics. I realize that some of you find science and physics >frightful, but they really are remarkable tools for advancing technology. I do not reject scientific theory and have never indicated I do. At the same time I do not accept the existence of any creator nor do I automatically accept the requirement that existence alone proves something must have been created. Existence only proves itself and does nothing toward any origin either to prove one existed or what that origin was. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 03:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-FFE6AD.03221624082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #516389 |
In article <9fnltad2dpu26tt5lno98eq1hu3nktngtc@4ax.com>, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > I do not reject scientific theory and have never indicated I do. At > the same time I do not accept the existence of any creator nor do I > automatically accept the requirement that existence alone proves > something must have been created. Existence only proves itself and > does nothing toward any origin either to prove one existed or what > that origin was. What you are is so combative that you cannot even cope with the verb "create". You are terrified that if you accept the normal meaning and use of the word, it will obligate you agree to concepts not even under discussion. Do you have a problem with ever verb that allows but does not require an agent? Do you have a similar freak-out at "the Earth's core is made of iron and nickel" because allowing that Earth's core is "made" of anything forces you to accept that there must be a "maker"? You are pathetic. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 20:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <k2dntattgl6htl41hrokkutgie1a31302j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516398 |
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 03:22:16 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id <charlie-gordon1492-FFE6AD.03221624082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> wrote: >In article <9fnltad2dpu26tt5lno98eq1hu3nktngtc@4ax.com>, > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> I do not reject scientific theory and have never indicated I do. At >> the same time I do not accept the existence of any creator nor do I >> automatically accept the requirement that existence alone proves >> something must have been created. Existence only proves itself and >> does nothing toward any origin either to prove one existed or what >> that origin was. > >What you are is so combative that you cannot even cope with the verb "create". I can cope with it, and I understand a creation does not require any intelligent involvement. In the context used here however there is almost some god lurking in the corner somewhere and that I will not accept. >You are terrified that if you accept the normal meaning and use of the word, it >will obligate you agree to concepts not even under discussion. Not at all. > >Do you have a problem with ever verb that allows but does not require an agent? Nope, just as I explained above. >Do you have a similar freak-out at "the Earth's core is made of iron and nickel" I have not kept up with the latest in that area so I cannot comment. >because allowing that Earth's core is "made" of anything forces you to accept >that there must be a "maker"? You are pathetic. You do love your nonsense don't you? -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 17:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-2F2C17.17505423082015@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516149 |
In article <charlie-gordon1492-9B23D8.10315523082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: > In article <hlwdjsd2-2A7FE0.05432723082015@news.giganews.com>, > Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: > > > In article > > <charlie-gordon1492-790244.05135823082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>, > > je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: > > > > > In article <vddjtad74h5h28oemmj9d8ce6bkp127s8c@4ax.com>, > > > Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 03:34:05 -0700, je suis charly > > > > <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: > > > > > > > > >In article <njuita9f87497pbi4rikth6vi7au7o1dga@4ax.com>, > > > > > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> >What's equally difficult is to imagine the creation of the universe > > > > >> >all > > > > >> >by > > > > >> >it's > > > > >> >own self. > > > > >> > > > > >> What evidence do you have that the universe was ever created? > > > > > > > > > >Because it is here? > > > > > > > > How is that "evidence" that it was created, imbecile? > > > > > > Because it is not a void. > > > > How is THAT evidence that it was created? > > Because it was not and then it is. That is generally refered to as a > creation. Where? And by whom? -- JD Išve officially given up trying to find the bottom of the barrel that is Republican depravity.--Jidyom Rosario, Addicting Info
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 18:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-BAE62C.18090723082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #516337 |
In article <hlwdjsd2-2F2C17.17505423082015@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: > > Because it was not and then it is. That is generally refered to as a > > creation. > > > Where? And by whom? Where? Everywhere. By whom? That is your hypothesis. You tell me. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 07:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <epfjta57ib6b0pc66pto7j2md0gub4lh20@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516055 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 05:13:58 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >In article <vddjtad74h5h28oemmj9d8ce6bkp127s8c@4ax.com>, > Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 03:34:05 -0700, je suis charly >> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >> >> >In article <njuita9f87497pbi4rikth6vi7au7o1dga@4ax.com>, >> > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> > >> >> >What's equally difficult is to imagine the creation of the universe all >> >> >by >> >> >it's >> >> >own self. >> >> >> >> What evidence do you have that the universe was ever created? >> > >> >Because it is here? >> >> How is that "evidence" that it was created, imbecile? > >Because it is not a void. What has that got to do with it. imbecile?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 10:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-7B58D0.10301223082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #516067 |
In article <epfjta57ib6b0pc66pto7j2md0gub4lh20@4ax.com>, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 05:13:58 -0700, je suis charly > <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: > > >In article <vddjtad74h5h28oemmj9d8ce6bkp127s8c@4ax.com>, > > Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 03:34:05 -0700, je suis charly > >> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: > >> > >> >In article <njuita9f87497pbi4rikth6vi7au7o1dga@4ax.com>, > >> > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> > > >> >> >What's equally difficult is to imagine the creation of the universe > >> >> >all > >> >> >by > >> >> >it's > >> >> >own self. > >> >> > >> >> What evidence do you have that the universe was ever created? > >> > > >> >Because it is here? > >> > >> How is that "evidence" that it was created, imbecile? > > > >Because it is not a void. > > What has that got to do with it. imbecile? Oh, my, is it the word "create" that has you in such a tizzy? This might come as a shock to you but words like "create" are often used without an implied agency. They are often used to simply refer nonexistence followed by existence. You are far too reactive; you act as if colloquial use of a word somehow obligates you accept all possible meanings. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 13:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ii4ktap58h2obv06bri84d3dgnf24khpnb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516144 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:30:12 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >In article <epfjta57ib6b0pc66pto7j2md0gub4lh20@4ax.com>, > Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 05:13:58 -0700, je suis charly >> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >> >> >In article <vddjtad74h5h28oemmj9d8ce6bkp127s8c@4ax.com>, >> > Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> > >> >> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 03:34:05 -0700, je suis charly >> >> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >> >> >> >> >In article <njuita9f87497pbi4rikth6vi7au7o1dga@4ax.com>, >> >> > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >What's equally difficult is to imagine the creation of the universe >> >> >> >all >> >> >> >by >> >> >> >it's >> >> >> >own self. >> >> >> >> >> >> What evidence do you have that the universe was ever created? >> >> > >> >> >Because it is here? >> >> >> >> How is that "evidence" that it was created, imbecile? >> > >> >Because it is not a void. >> >> What has that got to do with it. imbecile? > >Oh, my, is it the word "create" that has you in such a tizzy? As usual, a theist troll resorts to personal lies when people have been trying to communicate , and now he obfuscates as well. > This might come as >a shock to you but words like "create" are often used without an implied agency. This might come as a shock to you, but your intellectual betters try to use exact meanings to avoid equivocation. >They are often used to simply refer nonexistence followed by existence. People trying to communicate use better, less ambiguous words. > You are >far too reactive; you act as if colloquial use of a word somehow obligates you >accept all possible meanings. And you lie through your teeth.But then you're a theist troll who is only here to annoy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 13:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-DB4C0F.13522823082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #516190 |
In article <ii4ktap58h2obv06bri84d3dgnf24khpnb@4ax.com>, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > As usual, a theist troll resorts to personal lies when people have > been trying to communicate , and now he obfuscates as well. You are no fun. You fell right over. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 16:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrdch0$qp0$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516269 |
On 8/23/2015 3:52 PM, je suis charly wrote: > In article <ii4ktap58h2obv06bri84d3dgnf24khpnb@4ax.com>, > Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >> As usual, a theist troll resorts to personal lies when people have >> been trying to communicate , and now he obfuscates as well. > > You are no fun. You fell right over. > Yeah, but you crushed that dwarf. Hand me the pliers, Christopher; I've fingernails to pull from laughing boy Chucky.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 16:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7edktap6thr1braurd21vc1mqfsfui1q2h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516269 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:52:28 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >In article <ii4ktap58h2obv06bri84d3dgnf24khpnb@4ax.com>, > Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >> As usual, a theist troll resorts to personal lies when people have >> been trying to communicate , and now he obfuscates as well. > >You are no fun. You fell right over. You're just a deliberately stupid jerk, so why whine when you get treated as one?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 16:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrdcnv$qp0$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516284 |
On 8/23/2015 4:06 PM, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:52:28 -0700, je suis charly > <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: > >> In article <ii4ktap58h2obv06bri84d3dgnf24khpnb@4ax.com>, >> Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> >>> As usual, a theist troll resorts to personal lies when people have >>> been trying to communicate , and now he obfuscates as well. >> >> You are no fun. You fell right over. > > You're just a deliberately stupid jerk, so why whine when you get > treated as one? > I had observed that he was becoming dull and unamusing. He appears to be trying to suck up to me with attempts at humor, this time from Firesign Theater. He's not in my killfile yet. I'm going to see how much longer he'll dance for me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 15:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-25CE7E.15363423082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #516285 |
In article <mrdcnv$qp0$3@dont-email.me>, Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> wrote: > On 8/23/2015 4:06 PM, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:52:28 -0700, je suis charly > > <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: > > > >> In article <ii4ktap58h2obv06bri84d3dgnf24khpnb@4ax.com>, > >> Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >> > >>> As usual, a theist troll resorts to personal lies when people have > >>> been trying to communicate , and now he obfuscates as well. > >> > >> You are no fun. You fell right over. > > > > You're just a deliberately stupid jerk, so why whine when you get > > treated as one? > > > I had observed that he was becoming dull and unamusing. He appears to be > trying to suck up to me with attempts at humor, this time from Firesign > Theater. He's not in my killfile yet. I'm going to see how much longer > he'll dance for me. Oh, dear. If you are not going to amuse me any longer, I guess it is back to work. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 11:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrcr15$fcl$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516055 |
On 8/23/2015 7:13 AM, je suis charly wrote: > In article <vddjtad74h5h28oemmj9d8ce6bkp127s8c@4ax.com>, > Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 03:34:05 -0700, je suis charly >> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >> >>> In article <njuita9f87497pbi4rikth6vi7au7o1dga@4ax.com>, >>> Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>> What's equally difficult is to imagine the creation of the universe all >>>>> by >>>>> it's >>>>> own self. >>>> >>>> What evidence do you have that the universe was ever created? >>> >>> Because it is here? >> >> How is that "evidence" that it was created, imbecile? > > Because it is not a void. > The multiverse is eternal. Our little part of it originated; that is no evidence that it was created. BTW, let's say the universe was created. How does that get you to anything other than a natural event?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 11:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dbsjtatdsdp2g7homas6r0qoi67csf69qa@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516106 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 11:07:39 -0500, Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> wrote: >On 8/23/2015 7:13 AM, je suis charly wrote: >> In article <vddjtad74h5h28oemmj9d8ce6bkp127s8c@4ax.com>, >> Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 03:34:05 -0700, je suis charly >>> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <njuita9f87497pbi4rikth6vi7au7o1dga@4ax.com>, >>>> Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> What's equally difficult is to imagine the creation of the universe all >>>>>> by >>>>>> it's >>>>>> own self. >>>>> >>>>> What evidence do you have that the universe was ever created? >>>> >>>> Because it is here? >>> >>> How is that "evidence" that it was created, imbecile? >> >> Because it is not a void. >> >The multiverse is eternal. Our little part of it originated; that is no >evidence that it was created. > >BTW, let's say the universe was created. How does that get you to >anything other than a natural event? It's deceit by sleight of language. Calling everything "creation" is very old - but the stupids imagine this means there actually was a creator. But science has various scenarios, all based on existing knowledge not mere belief and, unlike religion, nobody insists that it was any of these. It's a lesson I learned from a kid's astronomy book sixty years ago, which described two different theories for planetary formation and said that both fitted the then available evidence but there was no reason to choose one over the other - that would have to wait for further observations, it could be either or even neither depending on what hadn't yet been discovered. In the event, planets were formed from the accretion disk and the other theory fell by the wayside. And because the universe is considered to have a zero sum over its life, there are no mass/energy conservation problems. This has been explained over and over again to the trolls, but they take no notice and never address any of it. All the theist trolls do is repeat the same old nonsense as if we had never addressed it every time - about something that is nothing to do with atheism in the first place.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 10:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-107946.10235623082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #516106 |
In article <mrcr15$fcl$1@dont-email.me>, Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> wrote: > >> How is that "evidence" that it was created, imbecile? > > > > Because it is not a void. > > > The multiverse is eternal. Our little part of it originated; that is no > evidence that it was created. What is your objective evidence that anything outside this universe exists? > BTW, let's say the universe was created. How does that get you to > anything other than a natural event? Why do you assume I want to get anything more? -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 17 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web