Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #499577 > unrolled thread

AE

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  AE The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-11 23:44 -0700
    Re: AE The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-11 23:53 -0700
      Re: AE A Nony Mouse <abc@cef.ghi> - 2015-06-12 17:40 -0600
      Re: AE benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-12 20:31 -0400
      Re: AE Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-14 15:00 -0500
      Re: AE Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2015-06-14 23:33 -0600
        Re: AE The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-14 23:01 -0700
          Re: AE The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-16 12:12 -0700
          Re: AE The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-17 12:49 -0700
            Re: AE Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2015-06-17 14:14 -0600
              Re: AE The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-17 15:40 -0700
                Re: E = m*c^2 Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2015-06-17 16:56 -0600
                Re: AE Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2015-06-18 14:41 -0600
    Re: AE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-06-14 11:10 -0700
    Re: AE "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 14:48 -0700

#499577 — AE

http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Einstein%27s%20is%20the%20bomb.jpg

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#499579

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Einstein%27s%20is%20the%20bomb.jpg



"I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is a childlike one," he wrote to a man 
who corresponded with him on the subject twice in the 1940s. 
"You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share the crusading spirit of the 
professional atheist. ... I prefer an attitude of 
humility corresponding to the weakness of our 
intellectual understanding of nature and of our own being."--Albert Einstein

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#499708

In article <557B2FE1.362A@ix.netcom.com>,
 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> I am proud to say I never read a science fiction book..or fiction books for 
> that matter...

That clearly has not prevented you from posting your own fiction.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#499721

On 06/12/2015 04:31 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
> news:557B3B49.17F2@ix.netcom.com:
>
>> HVAC wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/12/2015 11:17 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Nonsense! Everyone here knows that all "advanced" comes right
>>>> out of Star Trek! Warp engines are real, subspace is real,
>>>> transporters are real, replicators are real, Tricorders are
>>>> real, phasors are real, photon torpedoes are real, the list
>>>> is endless of the advanced science brought into our age
>>>> through Star Trek!
>>>
>>> BJ is well known as a 'Trekkie' at those star wars conventions.
>>> He lifts an eyebrow, parts his fingers and says "may the force
>>> be within you".
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cut off one head, two more shall take its place.
>>> HAIL HYDRA!
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
>>
>>
>> I must have beem misinformed or mistaken somewhere...but I
>> always thought a 'Trekkie" was a "star trek" fan.
>
> According to . . . some TV show I saw recently, "Trekkie" refers to
> fans of the original show, and fans of other shows prefer
> "Trekker."
>
> Yeah, I know.
>
>> So, I also
>> thought, "lifts an eyebrow, parts his fingers" was Spock... and
>> Spock didn't say "may the force be within you". So, my thinking
>> could have been...distorted.
>>
> You imply that you think. You're funny.

Cripes! Harlow is not only ignorant of all science, but ignorant of all 
science fiction as well.

So sad. He mad. I glad.

-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#500024

On 6/14/2015 11:35 AM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 7:57:09 AM UTC-7, Sesiom wrote:
>> On 6/12/2015 2:23 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Einstein%27s%20is%20the%20bomb.jpg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
"I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is 
a childlike one," he wrote to a man
>>>> who corresponded with him on the subject twice in the 1940s.
>>>> "You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share the crusading
>>>> spirit of the professional atheist. ... I prefer an attitude
>>>> of humility corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual
>>>> understanding of nature and of our own being."--Albert
>>>> Einstein
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lest it distort pure science and give people the false illusion
>>> of scientific understanding, he recommended complete abstinence
>>> from any type of science fiction. -albert einstein
>>>
>>
>> see? Einstein was self admitted agnostic, not jewish.  He also
>> provides very wise advice on ditching all made up stuff like
>> science fiction, reality shows, and climate change.
>
> Sesiom  Einstein was born a Jew.He knew he was Jewish,and he knew all
> about bigots. He also knew if he was not Jewish he would have gotten
> a Nobel for GR. Bigotry was big in his day (think Germany) and today
> we hear the bigots say "Einstein theories,and thinking is "WRONG"
> Think of the bigots in this group,and get the picture  Bert
>

  bigot = big + idiot

Einstein knew the Super Bigots in Germany first hand, had to leave.

Ever hear the story of his son by his first wife ? very sad

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#500111

In article <557E1296.3969@ix.netcom.com>,
 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> Albert Einstein’s Letter explaining the link between Relativity Theory and 
> Japan’s Atomic Bombings sold for $62,500.
> 
> 
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-B
> uilt-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> 
> 
> The link between Relativity and The Bomb is that The Atomic bomb created 
> Relativity.

It is then quite curious that relativity, and much of the "hoopla" about 
it, preceded the atomic bomb by so many years.

Special relativity was published in 1905, general relativity in 1915, 
but the first nuclear explosion did not occur until 1945.
-- 
Virgil
"Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#500112

Virgil wrote:
> 
> In article <557E1296.3969@ix.netcom.com>,
>  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> > Albert Einstein’s Letter explaining the link between Relativity Theory and
> > Japan’s Atomic Bombings sold for $62,500.
> >
> >
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-B
> > uilt-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> >
> >
> > The link between Relativity and The Bomb is that The Atomic bomb created
> > Relativity.
> 
> It is then quite curious that relativity, and much of the "hoopla" about
> it, preceded the atomic bomb by so many years.
> 
> Special relativity was published in 1905, general relativity in 1915,
> but the first nuclear explosion did not occur until 1945.
> --
> Virgil
> "Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)


You need to understand the 'correct order of events', and the 'link'...


e=mc^2 which is the link of the atomic bomb, and relativity wasn't until
after e-mc2.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#500492

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> 
> Virgil wrote:
> 
> >  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> trolled:
> >> e=mc^2 which is the link of the atomic bomb, and relativity wasn't until
> >> after e-mc2.
> >
> > The Einstein letter linking e = mc^2 to the bomb
> 
> It is _E₍₀₎ = mc²_.
> 
> > was written to Franklin Roosevlt, not Theodore Roosevelt!
> 
> YMMD :)
> 
> But *please* read the MT-NewsWatcher manual on how to trim Crossposts and
> set Followup-To.  Or simply do not feed the (Starmaker) troll(s).
> 
> F'up2 sci.physics
> 
> PointedEars


Keep your Pointed Ears off my threads!


Do I make myself clear?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#500754

Virgil wrote:
> 
> In article <55811985.1603@ix.netcom.com>,
>  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> > Virgil wrote:
> > >
> > > In article <5580FCCC.5795@ix.netcom.com>,
> > >  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Let me explain like no one else in this earth will explain what E-mc^2
> > > > is...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The E in E=mc^2 stands for only one thing and one thing only...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ATOMIC BOMB. The E in E-mc^2 stands for the material used for maiking an
> > > > ATOMIC BOMB.
> > > >
> > > > E = Uranium/radium
> > >
> > > On the contrary, it is the uranium that is the m in the E = mc^2.
> > > Every unit of mass (the m) that is converted to energy (the E) produces
> > > c^2 units of energy, where c is the speed of light in appropriate units.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > (anybody tells you different, they are lying to you...is is irrefutable)
> > >
> > > Anybody tells me what you have been saying, THAT person is the one lying!
> > > --
> > > Virgil
> > > "Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)
> >
> >
> > You cannot convert mass to energy because mass has energy already in it.
> 
> You can sometimes convert what appears as either mass or energy from one
> form of appearance to the other
> >
> >
> > E does not stand for Energy.
> 
> AccordinG to EINSTEIN it does! At least in that equation!
> And Einstein should know 'cause he invented that equation!
> --
> Virgil
> "Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)


Einstein was German. They translated "E" from German...which is the letter "L", which means 'Uranium/radium'.


The E which is Energy is a generic word...it relates to 'Uranium/radium'.


Read the first paragraph of the letter Einstein wrote:
http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first


"...element 'uranium' may be turned into a new and important source of 'energy' in the immediate future."


This letter is a bluprint for the making of the ATOMIC BOMB:
http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first

The letter contains *all* the information needed to Build an Atomic Bomb:
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html


The Starmaker


Do you like the TV show Hogans Heros, Virgil?

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#500763

In article <5581CF49.5BBC@ix.netcom.com>,
 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> > > > > ATOMIC BOMB. The E in E-mc^2 stands for the material used for maiking 
> > > > > an
> > > > > ATOMIC BOMB.
 
You are about 40 years too late! In 1905, the E meant Energy!

http://earthsky.org/human-world/this-date-in-science-emc2
September 27, 1905. On this date, while he was employed at a patent 
office, Albert Einstein published a paper titled "Does the Inertia of a 
Body Depend Upon Its Energy-Content?" It was the last of four papers he 
submitted that year to the journal Annalen der Physik. The first 
explained the photoelectric effect, the second offered experimental 
proof of the existence of atoms, and the third introduced the theory of 
special relativity. In the fourth paper, Einstein explained the 
relationship between energy and mass. That is, E=mc2
What does it mean? It means that, from the standpoint of physics, energy 
and mass are interchangeable. In the equation:
E is energy
m is mass
c is the speed of light
In other words, energy = mass X the speed of light squared.
-- 
Virgil
"Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#500798

Virgil wrote:
> 
> In article <5581CF49.5BBC@ix.netcom.com>,
>  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> > > > > > ATOMIC BOMB. The E in E-mc^2 stands for the material used for maiking
> > > > > > an
> > > > > > ATOMIC BOMB.
> 
> You are about 40 years too late! In 1905, the E meant Energy!
> 
> http://earthsky.org/human-world/this-date-in-science-emc2
> September 27, 1905. On this date, while he was employed at a patent
> office, Albert Einstein published a paper titled "Does the Inertia of a
> Body Depend Upon Its Energy-Content?" It was the last of four papers he
> submitted that year to the journal Annalen der Physik. The first
> explained the photoelectric effect, the second offered experimental
> proof of the existence of atoms, and the third introduced the theory of
> special relativity. In the fourth paper, Einstein explained the
> relationship between energy and mass. That is, E=mc2
> What does it mean? It means that, from the standpoint of physics, energy
> and mass are interchangeable. In the equation:
> E is energy
> m is mass
> c is the speed of light
> In other words, energy = mass X the speed of light squared.
> --
> Virgil
> "Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)


 the equation E = mc2 was not originally written as a formula but as a sentence in German
 saying that if a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/V2. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass%E2%80%93energy_equivalence



Now "L in the form of radiation", do you what radiation means? 'Uranium/radium'. 


Not in the form of energy, in the form of RADIATION! ATOMIC BoMbS.


E=Radiation

You need to learn to read the hidden subtext..
http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first


But, of course...if you rather  believe the rest of the crowd that E=Energy, I don't have a problem with that.


The Starmaker


Oh Fatherland, Fatherland,
Show us the sign
Your children have waited to see.
The morning will come
When the world is mine.
Tomorrow belongs to me!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#500801 — Re: E = m*c^2

In article <5581F77B.5AC6@ix.netcom.com>,
 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> But, of course...if you rather  believe the rest of the crowd that E=Energy, 
> I don't have a problem with that.

AND in your world is m not mass and is c not the speed of light in 
vacuo?
-- 
Virgil
"Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#501015

In article <558319E7.3CE4@ix.netcom.com>,
 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> The Starmaker wrote:
> > 
> > Virgil wrote:
> > >
> > > In article <5581CF49.5BBC@ix.netcom.com>,
> > >  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > > ATOMIC BOMB. The E in E-mc^2 stands for the material used for 
> > > > > > > > maiking
> > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > ATOMIC BOMB.
> > >
> > > You are about 40 years too late! In 1905, the E meant Energy!
> > >
> > > http://earthsky.org/human-world/this-date-in-science-emc2
> > > September 27, 1905. On this date, while he was employed at a patent
> > > office, Albert Einstein published a paper titled "Does the Inertia of a
> > > Body Depend Upon Its Energy-Content?" It was the last of four papers he
> > > submitted that year to the journal Annalen der Physik. The first
> > > explained the photoelectric effect, the second offered experimental
> > > proof of the existence of atoms, and the third introduced the theory of
> > > special relativity. In the fourth paper, Einstein explained the
> > > relationship between energy and mass. That is, E=mc2
> > > What does it mean? It means that, from the standpoint of physics, energy
> > > and mass are interchangeable. In the equation:
> > > E is energy
> > > m is mass
> > > c is the speed of light
> > > In other words, energy = mass X the speed of light squared.
> > > --
> > > Virgil
> > > "Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)
> > 
> >  the equation E = mc2 was not originally written as a formula but as a 
> >  sentence in German
> >  saying that if a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its 
> >  mass diminishes by L/V2.
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass%E2%80%93energy_equivalence
> > 
> > Now "L in the form of radiation", do you what radiation means? 
> > 'Uranium/radium'.
> > 
> > Not in the form of energy, in the form of RADIATION! ATOMIC BoMbS.
> > 
> > E=Radiation
> > 
> > You need to learn to read the hidden subtext..
> > http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first
> 
> 
> In order for one to understand What the E stands for in E = mc2, one needs to
> know the *history*...to undertand what Einstein was thinking.
> 
> E is a genereic word..it doesn't specifically say what type of Energy.
> 
> You need to understand what type of energy Albert Einstein was 'thinking; of.
> 
> He was thinking of using radiation ('Uranium/radium')....to make, an ATOMIC 
> BOMB.

Not in 1905, when he first pubished R = mxc^2, he was't!
-- 
Virgil
"Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#500004

<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Swine :B::ert Glazier "reber g=emc^2" wrote:
Kike Sternmacher  The Starmaker wrote:
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Einstein%27s%20is%20the%20bomb.jpg
>
Cretin :B::ert Glazier wrote:
To sum up all the above posts its G=EMC^2 which I stole off
a Farmer's Barn and advertized it as my own idea, because
"G" for Glazier,  "G" for "GOD", "G" for "GRAVITY"
My universe equation G=EMC^2  offends no one.That is why
I get email, and mail from big guns in science,and leaders in
religion. The letter from Pope Benedict is worth a lot for he was
the only Pope to step down even before I introduced myself
as/with:
:B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex &
:B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how every thing works,.."
:B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert.
:B:: ***** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert *****
:B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and
:B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. "

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#500534

On Thursday, June 11, 2015 at 11:44:28 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Einstein%27s%20is%20the%20bomb.jpg

Reality is Einstein did not write the letter,but signed it.He could never do anything in a lab.He did know it could be built,and Germany had Heisenberg.Had Germany let Jews alone they would have had the bomb.They lost Fermi,Bohr.Teller,Born,Millers just to name a few. TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web