Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #497980 > unrolled thread

Stars

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-05 12:40 -0700
    Re: Stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 14:50 -0500
    Re: Stars Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-05 15:45 -0500
      Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-05 14:22 -0700
        Re: Stars "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-06-05 17:52 -0400
          Re: Stars Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-05 16:54 -0500
          Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-05 15:41 -0700
          Re: Stars William Vetter <mdhangton@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 18:52 -0400
      Re: Stars "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-06-05 17:47 -0400
      Re: Stars Forehead <head@4the.hills> - 2015-06-05 18:24 -0500
        Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-05 23:35 -0700
          Re: Stars "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-06-06 04:12 -0400
          Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-06 12:32 -0700
            Re: Stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-06 15:04 -0500
            Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-07 00:12 -0700
              Re: Stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-07 08:37 -0500
                Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-07 12:40 -0700
                  Re: Stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-07 20:33 -0500
                    Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-07 18:43 -0700
                      Re: Stars Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-07 20:58 -0500
                        Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-08 13:48 -0700
                      Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-08 13:55 -0700
                        Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-08 13:56 -0700
                          Re: Stars Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-08 21:54 -0500
                        Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-08 18:14 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#498759

Sesiom wrote:
> 
> On 6/7/2015 8:43 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Sam Wormley wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/7/15 2:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> The stars, our sun...is 'aware' of the earth. In other words, the sun has ...consciousness.
> >>
> >>     You don't say -- hopefully our sun wound puff up and vaporize
> >>     the earth someday.
> >>
> >
> >
> > but you wrote: "That leaves our sun with no possibility of exploding."
> >
> >
> > ain't you contradicting yourself??...
> >
> >
> > without links, you're lost...ain't you?
> >
> 
>             "ain't you?"
> 
> please use the Queen's English correctly.
> 
> you may not know any physics, but you could use an on-line English
> checker. Your English is more worser than Wormleys.
> 
> you not know Engrlish that good ither,  you Russian or Rastafari ?
> 
> a good learning lession for you


Couldn't you just simply say "Ain't ain't a word?"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#498760

pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, June 7, 2015 at 6:42:18 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Sam Wormley wrote:
> > >
> > > On 6/7/15 2:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > The stars, our sun...is 'aware' of the earth. In other words, the sun has ...consciousness.
> > >
> > >    You don't say -- hopefully our sun wound puff up and vaporize
> > >    the earth someday.
> > >
> >
> >
> > but you wrote: "That leaves our sun with no possibility of exploding."
> >
> >
> > ain't you contradicting yourself??...
> >
> >
> > without links, you're lost...ain't you?
> 
> A star the size of the Sun will indeed "puff up" near the end of its life, and become a planetary nebula... but this is not at all the same thing as exploding. You want a link, no problem...
> 
> http://www.astro.washington.edu/users/balick/WFPC2/
> 
> "95% of all stars that we see in our own galaxy, the Milky Way, will ultimately become "planetary nebulae". This includes the Sun.
> 
> Much as a butterfly emerges when its chrysalis is ejected, planetary nebulae are formed when a red giant star ejects its outer layers as clouds of luminescent gas, revealing the dense, hot, and tiny white dwarf star at its core.
> 
> The other 5% of stars -- that is, those born with masses more than eight times larger than our Sun -- end their lives as supernovae."
> 
> So, only 5% of all stars, the largest and heaviest, explode in a supernova.
> 
> You need more links? No problem...
> 
> http://www.cosmotography.com/images/planetary_nebula_formation.html
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetary_nebula
> 
> http://www.space.com/17715-planetary-nebula.html
> 
> https://www.eso.org/sci/meetings/2010/stars2010/Presentations/4March/Zijlstra_ESO2010.pdf
> 
> Happy reading, I hope you learn something new today. This is fascinating stuff!
> 
> \Paul A


the craziest topics you guys have is this...'fate of the universe'
thing....why would anybody want to know what will happen a trillion
years from now?

Shouldn't yous be more concern with...today, instead of escaping to a
trillion years from now? Good pot can do the same thing..

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#498761

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, June 7, 2015 at 6:42:18 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Sam Wormley wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 6/7/15 2:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > The stars, our sun...is 'aware' of the earth. In other words, the sun has ...consciousness.
> > > >
> > > >    You don't say -- hopefully our sun wound puff up and vaporize
> > > >    the earth someday.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > but you wrote: "That leaves our sun with no possibility of exploding."
> > >
> > >
> > > ain't you contradicting yourself??...
> > >
> > >
> > > without links, you're lost...ain't you?
> >
> > A star the size of the Sun will indeed "puff up" near the end of its life, and become a planetary nebula... but this is not at all the same thing as exploding. You want a link, no problem...
> >
> > http://www.astro.washington.edu/users/balick/WFPC2/
> >
> > "95% of all stars that we see in our own galaxy, the Milky Way, will ultimately become "planetary nebulae". This includes the Sun.
> >
> > Much as a butterfly emerges when its chrysalis is ejected, planetary nebulae are formed when a red giant star ejects its outer layers as clouds of luminescent gas, revealing the dense, hot, and tiny white dwarf star at its core.
> >
> > The other 5% of stars -- that is, those born with masses more than eight times larger than our Sun -- end their lives as supernovae."
> >
> > So, only 5% of all stars, the largest and heaviest, explode in a supernova.
> >
> > You need more links? No problem...
> >
> > http://www.cosmotography.com/images/planetary_nebula_formation.html
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetary_nebula
> >
> > http://www.space.com/17715-planetary-nebula.html
> >
> > https://www.eso.org/sci/meetings/2010/stars2010/Presentations/4March/Zijlstra_ESO2010.pdf
> >
> > Happy reading, I hope you learn something new today. This is fascinating stuff!
> >
> > \Paul A
> 
> the craziest topics you guys have is this...'fate of the universe'
> thing....why would anybody want to know what will happen a trillion
> years from now?
> 
> Shouldn't yous be more concern with...today, instead of escaping to a
> trillion years from now? Good pot can do the same thing..



take a 'puff-up'....of cambodian red.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#498840

On 6/8/2015 3:56 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
ttp://www.astro.washington.edu/users/balick/WFPC2/
>>>>>>
>>> Much as a butterfly emerges when its chrysalis is ejected,
>>> planetary nebulae are formed when a red giant star ejects its
>>> outer layers as clouds of luminescent gas, revealing the dense,
>>> hot, and tiny white dwarf star at its core.
>>>
ing....why would anybody want to know what will happen a trillion
>> years from now?
>>
>> Shouldn't yous be more concern with...today, instead of escaping to
>> a trillion years from now? Good pot can do the same thing..
>
>
>
> take a 'puff-up'....of cambodian red.
>


  that paint has lead in it, no wonder you that way

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#498813

pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Monday, June 8, 2015 at 1:55:14 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > pnal@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sunday, June 7, 2015 at 6:42:18 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Sam Wormley wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 6/7/15 2:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > The stars, our sun...is 'aware' of the earth. In other words, the sun has ...consciousness.
> > > > >
> > > > >    You don't say -- hopefully our sun wound puff up and vaporize
> > > > >    the earth someday.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > but you wrote: "That leaves our sun with no possibility of exploding."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ain't you contradicting yourself??...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > without links, you're lost...ain't you?
> > >
> > > A star the size of the Sun will indeed "puff up" near the end of its life, and become a planetary nebula... but this is not at all the same thing as exploding. You want a link, no problem...
> > >
> > > http://www.astro.washington.edu/users/balick/WFPC2/
> > >
> > > "95% of all stars that we see in our own galaxy, the Milky Way, will ultimately become "planetary nebulae". This includes the Sun.
> > >
> > > Much as a butterfly emerges when its chrysalis is ejected, planetary nebulae are formed when a red giant star ejects its outer layers as clouds of luminescent gas, revealing the dense, hot, and tiny white dwarf star at its core.
> > >
> > > The other 5% of stars -- that is, those born with masses more than eight times larger than our Sun -- end their lives as supernovae."
> > >
> > > So, only 5% of all stars, the largest and heaviest, explode in a supernova.
> > >
> > > You need more links? No problem...
> > >
> > > http://www.cosmotography.com/images/planetary_nebula_formation.html
> > >
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetary_nebula
> > >
> > > http://www.space.com/17715-planetary-nebula.html
> > >
> > > https://www.eso.org/sci/meetings/2010/stars2010/Presentations/4March/Zijlstra_ESO2010.pdf
> > >
> > > Happy reading, I hope you learn something new today. This is fascinating stuff!
> > >
> > > \Paul A
> >
> >
> > the craziest topics you guys have is this...'fate of the universe'
> > thing....why would anybody want to know what will happen a trillion
> > years from now?
> >
> > Shouldn't yous be more concern with...today, instead of escaping to a
> > trillion years from now? Good pot can do the same thing..
> 
> I don't recall 'fate of the universe' being mentioned or discussed in this thread...

well, if the sun puffs up and vaporize the earth...does the universe
exist then?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web