Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #496833 > unrolled thread

Re: Who asked "What is the theory of relativity?"

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Who asked "What is the theory of relativity?" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-05-31 11:27 -0700
    Re: Who asked "What is the theory of relativity?" Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-05-31 13:32 -0500
      Re: Who asked "What is the theory of relativity?" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-05-31 14:42 -0700
        Re: Who asked "What is the theory of relativity?" Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-05-31 17:14 -0500
          Re: Who asked "What is the theory of relativity?" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-05-31 15:50 -0700

#496833 — Re: Who asked "What is the theory of relativity?"

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > I just cannot wait for the next Einsteins to come along, can you?
> 
> How about the new einstein comes up with a computer virus that...kills
> people instead?
> 
> Requires a new way of thinking..
> 
> First you need to make
> the new einstein...a little angry.
> 
> (when you get you people angry..
> you wanna blow things up)
> 
> mad scientists i think they call it.
> 
> Do you suppose they can come up with a bomb that can blow up the whole
> planet?
> 
> You know...kill all the stupid people...


Maybe drill a hole to the center of the earth and drop an atomic bomb?


When it reaches the center...it explodes.


Ask Einstein, he'll explain to you how to do it....(he's the bomb expert)
he calls it an electro magnetic bomb...it set to go off automatially when it hits the center of the earth.


http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb2.jpg
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb3.jpg



Come on, lets do some good science, lets blow up the planet...i wanna get rid of all the stupid people.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#496835

On 5/31/15 1:27 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Come on, lets do some good science, lets blow up the planet...i wanna get rid of all the stupid people.

   Lots of nuclear bombs have be detonated underground.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion
of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related
social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#496873

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 5/31/15 1:27 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Come on, lets do some good science, lets blow up the planet...i wanna get rid of all the stupid people.
> 
>    Lots of nuclear bombs have be detonated underground.


if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.

Science needs to come up with solutions. 


The goal of drilling a hole to the *center* of the earth is not to explode it, it's to implode it.


We're not trying to make earthquakes here....get with the program!


The goal is to blow up the planet!


Only evil scientist may apply...


Solutions only. I don't wanna hear "I don't know." "I don't know." "I don't know." "I don't know."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#496894

On 5/31/15 4:42 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Science needs to come up with solutions.

   Science is about modeling how mother nature work.

   Science
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science

> Science (from Latin scientia, meaning "knowledge"[2]) is a systematic
> enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of
> testable explanations and predictions about the universe.[nb 1] In an
> older and closely related meaning, "science" also refers to this body
> of knowledge itself, of the type that can be rationally explained and
> reliably applied. Ever since classical antiquity, science as a type
> of knowledge has been closely linked to philosophy. In the West
> during the early modern period the words "science" and "philosophy of
> nature" were sometimes used interchangeably,[3]:p.3 and until the
> 19th century natural philosophy (which is today called "natural
> science") was considered a branch of philosophy.[4]
>
> In modern usage however, "science" most often refers to a way of
> pursuing knowledge, not only the knowledge itself. It is also often
> restricted to those branches of study that seek to explain the
> phenomena of the material universe.[5] In the 17th and 18th centuries
> scientists increasingly sought to formulate knowledge in terms of
> laws of nature. Over the course of the 19th century, the word
> "science" became increasingly associated with the scientific method
> itself, as a disciplined way to study the natural world, including
> physics, chemistry, geology and biology. It is in the 19th century
> also that the term scientist began to be applied to those who sought
> knowledge and understanding of nature.




-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion
of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related
social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#496906

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 5/31/15 4:42 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Science needs to come up with solutions.
> 
>    Science is about modeling how mother nature work.
> 
>    Science
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science
> 
> > Science (from Latin scientia, meaning "knowledge"[2]) is a systematic
> > enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of
> > testable explanations and predictions about the universe.[nb 1] In an
> > older and closely related meaning, "science" also refers to this body
> > of knowledge itself, of the type that can be rationally explained and
> > reliably applied. Ever since classical antiquity, science as a type
> > of knowledge has been closely linked to philosophy. In the West
> > during the early modern period the words "science" and "philosophy of
> > nature" were sometimes used interchangeably,[3]:p.3 and until the
> > 19th century natural philosophy (which is today called "natural
> > science") was considered a branch of philosophy.[4]
> >
> > In modern usage however, "science" most often refers to a way of
> > pursuing knowledge, not only the knowledge itself. It is also often
> > restricted to those branches of study that seek to explain the
> > phenomena of the material universe.[5] In the 17th and 18th centuries
> > scientists increasingly sought to formulate knowledge in terms of
> > laws of nature. Over the course of the 19th century, the word
> > "science" became increasingly associated with the scientific method
> > itself, as a disciplined way to study the natural world, including
> > physics, chemistry, geology and biology. It is in the 19th century
> > also that the term scientist began to be applied to those who sought
> > knowledge and understanding of nature.
> 
> --
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion
> of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related
> social issues.


I wrote: Only evil scientist may apply...

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web