Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #557922 > unrolled thread

A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 10:13 -0800
    Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 12:36 -0600
      Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 10:57 -0800
        Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-29 14:13 -0600
          Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 12:58 -0800
            Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-29 21:29 +0000
              Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 15:00 -0800
                Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 17:32 -0600
                  Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 15:31 -0800
                    Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 20:16 -0600
                Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-01 00:01 +0000
              Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:08 -0800
                Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 00:53 +0000
                Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:14 -0800
                  Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 19:21 +0000
                    Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:35 -0800
                      Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-03-05 13:06 -0800
                        Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 13:52 -0800
                          Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-04-09 15:28 -0700
                            Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 17:17 -0700
                            Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-09 19:40 -0500
                            Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-10 04:30 +0200
                      Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 22:07 +0000
                        Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 14:28 -0800
                          Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 22:44 +0000
    Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-29 19:38 +0000
    Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 11:52 -0800
      Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-01 21:46 -0800
        Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 01:41 -0500
          Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-01 23:31 -0800
      Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 07:22 -0800
        Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 13:33 -0800
          Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 16:25 -0600
            Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 14:45 -0800
              Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 20:19 -0600
          Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 15:10 -0800
    Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-03-02 14:36 -0800
    Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 00:39 -0700
    Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 19:08 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#569321

On 4/9/2016 5:28 PM, edprochak@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 4:52:38 PM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote:
>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 1:06:51 PM UTC-8, edpr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 2:36:05 PM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:31:07 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> []

>>>>> Of course not, that would be delusional
>>>>> and contrary to hundreds of
>>>>> years of physics.
>>>>
>>>> Hundreds of years, . . . . and you can't
>>>> find one reference.  Hmm.

>>> Hundreds of post by now and you still cannot provide
>>> the name of the school that granted your degree.
>>>
>>> Do you have even a Bachelor degree in physics?
>>> Did you even take physics in High school?
>>> You are a sad troll.

>> Maybe you should find a gentler hobby.
>>   I've heard pressing leaves
>> in books can be quite relaxing.
>
> You think my comment was cruel (ungentle) ?
> So sorry for upsetting little Jimmy's feelings.
>
>

> I've been on USENET for a long time. I've dealt
> with much smarter trolls than you.
>
> My recent posts are just some light amusement.
> But they also serve the purpose of hopefully
> enlightening others that may otherwise think
> you actually have a clue.
>
> You never answer, but I'll keep asking:
> what degree? What school? PHD? MS? BS? GED?
> just tell us.
>
> Ed
>

James McGinn is one of those airy-fairy types that does not understand 
science at all, and is in fact is anti-science.  His book is unreadable, 
a not funny joke, and his videos are evidence for physical confinment. 
He does not work, lives at home with his mom in the basement, and 
presses leaves in his saner moments.  He won't or can't tell you 
anything real.  He is in a different delusional reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#569345

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

edprochak@gmail.com, in
<news:9b8ec801-12d2-42b8-b11d-ae2627555d73@googlegroups.com> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 4:52:38 PM UTC-5,
> James 'Tardnado' McGinn wrote:

>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 1:06:51 PM UTC-8,
>> edprochak@gmail.com wrote:

>>> Hundreds of post by now and you still cannot provide
>>> the name of the school that granted your degree.
>>> 
>>> Do you have even a Bachelor degree in physics?
>>> Did you even take physics in High school?
>>> You are a sad troll.

>> Maybe you should find a gentler hobby.
>> I've heard pressing leaves in books can be quite relaxing.

> You think my comment was cruel (ungentle) ?
> So sorry for upsetting little Jimmy's feelings.
> 
> I've been on USENET for a long time. I've dealt
> with much smarter trolls than you.
> 
> My recent posts are just some light amusement.
> But they also serve the purpose of hopefully
> enlightening others that may otherwise think
> you actually have a clue.
> 
> You never answer, but I'll keep asking:
> what degree? What school? PHD? MS? BS? GED?
> just tell us.
> 
> Ed

James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA obviously has his
high school education (likely achieved via GED after years of intense
extracurricular assistance at his Speshul Skool for Speshul Peeple),
as he's claimed to have failed out of an elective Basic Meteorology
class at community college.

He failed out because he took the class only as means of attempting to
justify his delusion. When he was informed by those far smarter and
saner than he is that his delusion didn't reflect reality, said truth
likely demonstrated for him multiple times via multiple means, he
likely gave up and retreated to mommy and daddy's basement to attempt
autodidactism-via-internet, leading him even further down the path of
psychosis.

But the sum total of his *completed* formal scientific education is
zero. He's far too insane to ever complete any scientific degree, as
that would entail his acknowledging reality and testing his kooky
claims empirically... and as we know, those who are insane will go to
often ridiculous lengths to avoid having to admit they are insane.

Strange, though, that the simplest route of having to avoid admitting
they are insane... that of simply embracing reality and constantly
testing to be sure they continue to embrace reality in their ideas...
is *always* shunned because testing requires work.

And those who are insane are, above all else, intellectually lazy.
They'd rather wallow in their delusion than do the hard work of
corroborating their ideas. We see this reality in James's having gone
no further than pulling supposition after supposition from his ass,
slapping them together and arguing that he's "discovered" something
new... while producing no comprehensive descriptive model, no
mathematical model, no experimental data, no empirical corroboration.

And now, due to his intellectual laziness, he's forced to expend
tremendous amounts of time and energy defending his intellectual
sloth... yet rather than doing that simple math to determine that
simply embracing reality would be energetically conservative, he
instead continues blathering on, merely running away from those who so
back him into a corner that he's forced to face the reality of his
insanity... as he's done with me.

Doesn't that about sum up your predicament, James? Answer the
question, you evasive shitbag.

-- 

Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions
which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions
inherent in your "theory":

============================================================
Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant
uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James?

Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a
lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating
that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself
if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia?
Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and
help you to not piss all over yourself?

And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a
pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser.

Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a
spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James.
You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was
Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase
water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change,
thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby
*dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James.

You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from
water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the
atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come
from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma"
if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport
energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates
your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin
with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've
created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly
destroys your theory, James.

You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's
Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrostatic attraction
increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and
electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually
cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James?

According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with
distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an
electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher
energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic
attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the
electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow,
that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic
attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just
violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level.

How do the polarity of the electron and the proton cancel if, as even
you admit, there is a distance between them as a result of the Pauli
Exclusion Principle and the repulsive van der Waals force, KookTard,
and once they've cancelled, how is polarity reestablished, and how is
that not dissociating the water?

If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why is the boiling
point of water anomalously high as compared to other H-bonded
hydrides, KookTard?

If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, then water's
cohesion would also drop. Why does it not do that, KookTard?

If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, how is water *not*
splitting up into hydroxide and hydronium ions, KookTard?

If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water have
such a high latent heat of vaporization, a direct result of that same
H bonding, KookTard? Of course, being the delusional uneducated moron
that you are, you deny that water has any latent heat of
vaporization... but you're *so* stupid that you didn't realize that
your denial also means you deny that water has a gaseous phase, and
that's just retarded.

If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water not
become much more dense upon fully H bonding, KookTard?

How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles
away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without
detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to
touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than
tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other
types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the
sky" sentient, James?

Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the
troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer,
Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant
tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that
way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim?

How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient
tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't
you explain that, James?

Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is
*below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory
not-a-theory" can't answer.

Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your
claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James?

Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your
delusions, James?

Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process,
James?

Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James?

Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions,
James?

Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James?

Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being
*deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James?

Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as
"delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James?

Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in
which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of
education about now, James?

Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out
of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been
deemed mentally incompetent, James?

Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class
as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist",
James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated,
whereas you're ignorant and uneducated?

What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was
the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then
you're not a physicist, James. LOL

If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while
inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an
airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient
jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its
back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to
shreds, Jim?

Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the
tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the
mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon
which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the
ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you
claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially
thousands of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream,
which would make air travel deadly.

Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if
the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado
being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James?

Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not?
That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is
it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity,
James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due
to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist
means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire
cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of
oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced
phenomenon due to density differential, James?

How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma,
Jim?

Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James?
How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their
surface area as you claim?

Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James?

How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a
hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a
semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and
dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will
preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an
extremely energetic laser, Jim?

Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?

How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?

Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes
in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do
not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water
molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account
for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your
implausible claims are workable, Jim?

Why are you not taking your meds, James?
============================================================

Why can't you answer those questions, Tardnado Jim?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559661

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:31:07 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 1:31:14 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: 
>> > 
>> >> >> So, basically, this fellow, Dr. Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, 
>> >> >> rips you a new a$$hole, and not only are you too stupid to realize it, 
>> >> >> you are then stupid enough to broadcast that fact here! 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Now everyone here knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you are 
>> >> >> crazier than an outhouse rat, and it was all accomplished by your very 
>> >> >> own hand. 
>> >> > 
>> >> > So that everybody knows what all the excitement is about: 
>> >> > 
>> >> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/Cin1MQ4ZyFU/QmNEM9mnDgAJ 
>> >> 
>> >> You keep posting this bat shit crazy theory without the required experiment 
>> >> that would show that it is not bat shit crazy. 
>> >> 
>> >> The more you do that, the more convinced everyone is that you are in fact 
>> >> bat shit crazy. 
>> > 
>> > Do you concede that there is no experimental evidence that clear air
>> > contains gaseous H2O? 
>> 
>> Of course not, that would be delusional and contrary to hundreds of
>> years of physics.
> 
> Hundreds of years, . . . . and you can't find one reference.  Hmm.

I, and grade school children can find them.

Why can't you?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559666

On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 2:16:04 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

> I, and grade school children can find them.

Are you and the grade school children keeping it secret?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559676

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 2:16:04 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>> I, and grade school children can find them.
> 
> Are you and the grade school children keeping it secret?

No one on the planet thinks there is any secret other than you, which
is quite typical for the delusional.

Has anyone ever taken out a restraining order on you?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557981

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> A great scientist was once asked how they know they've made a breakthrough.
>  Her response was illustrative.  She responded, "When everybody says you
> are wrong and nobody can explain why or how you are wrong."

Which is in stark contrast to your claims which can be, and have been,
disproven by school children at science fairs.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558391

On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:13:38 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> A great scientist was once asked how they know they've made a breakthrough.  Her response was illustrative.  She responded, "When everybody says you are wrong and nobody can explain why or how you are wrong."
> 
> The point is that often great scientific discoveries are concealed by group beliefs or myths.  
> 
> For example, suppose we were to go back in time 200 years to any small town in Europe.  Suppose somebody scoured the bible and came to the conclusion that XXX was not shown to be wrong.  The person might then attempt to explain this to other people in the community.  At first he would find that person after person would tell him that he must be mistaken, they would tell him it is in the bible. If he pressed the issue people would become increasingly emotional (sound familiar).  Eventually a priest would get involved, present a sermon in which he (the priest) declared that he had examined the issue and found that XXX is actually in the bible.  The priest would then urge all the parishioners to ignore, or harass the "denier".  Eventually they might excommunicate or even murder this person.  
> 
> There is no gaseous H2O in earth's atmosphere.  Convection has nothing to do with atmospheric flow.  Meteorologists are ignorant about the physics of atmospheric flow.
> 
> The fact that you simpletons get all emotional and can't produce any substantive dispute with any of this shows that "cold steam" and convection are just group delusions.
> 
> Stop whining and admit that you have no substantive dispute, you imbeciles.

Right or wrong its best to think in every direction(like me) Logic wins in the end. Short theory(few words) best. I liked Feynman,and fermi thinking best. Trebert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558517

<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> "reber g=emc^2" Full-Swine Glazier wrote:
"... Right or wrong its best to think in every direction(like me)
Logic wins in the end. Short theory(few words) best. I Trebert to
produce only"...  his daily load of Glazier's Gutter physics & his
Glazierola with which
:B::ert Glazier, the Hate monger, introduces himself with/as
>
:B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex &
:B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.."
:B:: "My Grandfathers had tails". -- Trebert
:B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert.
:B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew. I'm the only Jew that
:B:: got 2 form letters from two Popes". Bert
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
:B:: "I'll be sitting on Benj's, Saul Levi's & HVAC's face
:B:: to take a shit & say: "Open your mouth wide".
:B:: "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And laugh".
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>
:B:: "I'm M&M's Clueless Fuck-faced turd".Bert.
:B:: I'm "Siegman Fraud", "Bert, the Bowel Movement".
:B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world"
:B:: "Israel will drop its first H-bomb 'David' ". TreBert
:B:: __"I'm glad when war breaks out"__ Bert
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
:B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and
:B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. "....
:B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur, carbon & iron together
:B:: to make gun powder" ... & "while I was in custody
:B:: of Osceola Sheriff Bob Hansel, for thieving, his
:B:: deputies beat the shit out of me. So I bought a
:B:: 357 magnum for death threats by Sheriff Bob.
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
about which ....
Moderator General "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> aka
"Richard A." aka Harlow Campbell wrote:
>
"Bert, Seriously. You are the stupidest cocksucking
moron who ever came down the Mass Pike.
"Bert, you really are a pathetic excuse for a human
fucking being". "Bert is a racist. (And he's stupid too)"
"TreBert, you are one stupid cocksucker".
"Bert, does your stupidity know no bounds?"
"Bert, are the stupidest cocksucker on the planet."
"Spin THIS, Glazier, you fucking idiot." "Bert get
some spelling lessons, you feeble-minded fuck".
"Bert, your opinion doesn't count"
"Bert you are an idiot."
"Bert, you are a clueless cocksucker .... and "Bert
you are senile, dazed & confused. Fucked in the head.
"a trained cockroach is smarter than Bert"
"Bert, you should be arrested"
"Bert, I will call the police and tell them that your
van seems to be a center for drug activity in the
Wal-Mart parking lot".... .... about which....
 >
Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
Glazier, your brain is entangles with a used garbage can.
Glazier, "Its a shame" that your science is far worse
than the man's on the street.
Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage.
reber, take your you know it all thinking to your grave .
reber, your horseshit gets old.Say hi to Allah for me.
reber, you don't believe in science.
Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup.
Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__.
Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!..
 >
Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
Glazier, you are a spamming piece of shit...
Your Cocaine usage explains a lot of your posts.
You are drunk again. Give up and kill yourself.
 >
Astrophysicist "Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote:
GLAZIER YOU ARE A LAMEbrain PIECE OF SHIT!
Saul Levy
 >
Rocket Scientist Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
Glazier, you are babbling desperately. Is it sympathy
or pity you're grasping for? Stop it, either way.
 >
benj" <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
One only has to read Glazier's posts to see when Bert was lobotomized.
But Herb found poster "Double-A" who likes to be like Glazier,
but "Alkie-Alkie" is another kook who is as dumb as Bert is!
Now they party and frolic!...still waiting "to be loved by all"...
 >
hanson wrote:
So Glazier, given your Jewish Superiority complex and
your IQ of 122 and you knowing how how everything works,
... how come ended up shitting into a bucket in a 25 year
old van that you use as your residence on Wal-Mart's
Parking Lot? ..... .... What went wrong, Glazier?
 >
Now, Glazier consider "what will the say when Glazier dies?
Are they gonna say he was a kind man? He was a wise man?
He had plans? He has wisdom? .... BULLSHIT, MAN!"...
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TAixFYnDh4> [D]
BULLSHIT,... because Swine Glazier DOES have plans
which Glazier, the Swine, announced and posted at the
ripe age of eighty (80) when Glazier became a criminal
Graveyard Vandal who wrote:
 >
(1)
On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in:
https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J
Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh
when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert.
 >
Glazier's geriatric decay worsened, along with Glazier's chronic
alcoholism and Glazier, the Olde Kacker, became a Coprophile
IOW Glazier became a filthy Face Shitter at his age of 86, which
Glazier proudly announced & posted...
 >
(2)
On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, Jew-Swine Glazier
said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>:
Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser.
For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser.
Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after which...
 >
Glazier, the Criminal Graveyard Vandal & Face Shitter got even
worse over the next year and at Glazier's age of 87, Glazier
widened his piggish Face-shitting habit, as seen when Glazier
threatened...
 >
(3)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, as Swine Glazier wrote:
Harlow HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>: "I'll be sitting on your face
to take a shit & say: "Open wide". Trebert.
 >
(4)
The Criminal Swine Glazier refused to stop his practices & rejected
to be taken down, because Glazier at his age of 87+, Swine Glazier
labeled himself as "Siegman Fraud" which is synonym with "Bowel-
movement, actually saying that __ "Glazier is a piece of shit"__.
who, to boot, also announced that Glazier is a Transvestite who dons
female dresses and a Sarah Palin mask, saying that he has "nice
legs"...
 >
hanson wrote:
Now Glazier, since you are a curse and an embarrassment, day-in
and day-out, to every Jew everywhere, has it dawned on you
sorry, geriatric Transie-Swine, that as soon as you have been
"put away and under" Google will remove ALL YOUR posts from
the USENET and the only thing that will remain and show your
legacy, is because:
 >
Glazier the Swine fortunately posted:
.... "hanson made me famous"....
 >
hanson wrote
So, Glazier you swine you should be grateful to me & not wish
me ill like you did above, in your sick hate mongering, since
it is only because of hanson, that Web searches show for:
>
--- Swine Glazier G=EMC^2 Cretin ----            27'833 hits & rising
--- reber g=emc^2 Face-shitter & Vandal ----   27'953 hits & rising
>
cuz of hanson's caring and loving administering badly needed
<http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> to the mental
cripple aka <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier>. ... Shalom
Right or wrong its best to think in every direction(like me) Logic wins in 
the end. Short theory(few words) best. I liked Feynman,and fermi thinking 
best. Trebert 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558527

On 03/02/2016 12:46 AM, hanson wrote:
> <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> "reber g=emc^2" Full-Swine Glazier wrote:
> "... Right or wrong its best to think in every direction(like me)
> Logic wins in the end. Short theory(few words) best. I Trebert to
> produce only"...  his daily load of Glazier's Gutter physics & his
> Glazierola with which
> :B::ert Glazier, the Hate monger, introduces himself with/as
>>
> :B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex &
> :B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.."
> :B:: "My Grandfathers had tails". -- Trebert
> :B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert.
> :B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew. I'm the only Jew that
> :B:: got 2 form letters from two Popes". Bert
> :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>  >
> :B:: "I'll be sitting on Benj's, Saul Levi's & HVAC's face
> :B:: to take a shit & say: "Open your mouth wide".
> :B:: "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And laugh".
> :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>>
> :B:: "I'm M&M's Clueless Fuck-faced turd".Bert.
> :B:: I'm "Siegman Fraud", "Bert, the Bowel Movement".
> :B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world"
> :B:: "Israel will drop its first H-bomb 'David' ". TreBert
> :B:: __"I'm glad when war breaks out"__ Bert
> :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>  >
> :B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and
> :B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. "....
> :B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur, carbon & iron together
> :B:: to make gun powder" ... & "while I was in custody
> :B:: of Osceola Sheriff Bob Hansel, for thieving, his
> :B:: deputies beat the shit out of me. So I bought a
> :B:: 357 magnum for death threats by Sheriff Bob.
> :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>  >
> about which ....
> Moderator General "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> aka
> "Richard A." aka Harlow Campbell wrote:
>>
> "Bert, Seriously. You are the stupidest cocksucking
> moron who ever came down the Mass Pike.
> "Bert, you really are a pathetic excuse for a human
> fucking being". "Bert is a racist. (And he's stupid too)"
> "TreBert, you are one stupid cocksucker".
> "Bert, does your stupidity know no bounds?"
> "Bert, are the stupidest cocksucker on the planet."
> "Spin THIS, Glazier, you fucking idiot." "Bert get
> some spelling lessons, you feeble-minded fuck".
> "Bert, your opinion doesn't count"
> "Bert you are an idiot."
> "Bert, you are a clueless cocksucker .... and "Bert
> you are senile, dazed & confused. Fucked in the head.
> "a trained cockroach is smarter than Bert"
> "Bert, you should be arrested"
> "Bert, I will call the police and tell them that your
> van seems to be a center for drug activity in the
> Wal-Mart parking lot".... .... about which....
>  >
> Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Glazier, your brain is entangles with a used garbage can.
> Glazier, "Its a shame" that your science is far worse
> than the man's on the street.
> Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage.
> reber, take your you know it all thinking to your grave .
> reber, your horseshit gets old.Say hi to Allah for me.
> reber, you don't believe in science.
> Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup.
> Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__.
> Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!..
>  >
> Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Glazier, you are a spamming piece of shit...
> Your Cocaine usage explains a lot of your posts.
> You are drunk again. Give up and kill yourself.
>  >
> Astrophysicist "Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote:
> GLAZIER YOU ARE A LAMEbrain PIECE OF SHIT!
> Saul Levy
>  >
> Rocket Scientist Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> Glazier, you are babbling desperately. Is it sympathy
> or pity you're grasping for? Stop it, either way.
>  >
> benj" <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
> One only has to read Glazier's posts to see when Bert was lobotomized.
> But Herb found poster "Double-A" who likes to be like Glazier,
> but "Alkie-Alkie" is another kook who is as dumb as Bert is!
> Now they party and frolic!...still waiting "to be loved by all"...
>  >
> hanson wrote:
> So Glazier, given your Jewish Superiority complex and
> your IQ of 122 and you knowing how how everything works,
> ... how come ended up shitting into a bucket in a 25 year
> old van that you use as your residence on Wal-Mart's
> Parking Lot? ..... .... What went wrong, Glazier?
>  >
> Now, Glazier consider "what will the say when Glazier dies?
> Are they gonna say he was a kind man? He was a wise man?
> He had plans? He has wisdom? .... BULLSHIT, MAN!"...
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TAixFYnDh4> [D]
> BULLSHIT,... because Swine Glazier DOES have plans
> which Glazier, the Swine, announced and posted at the
> ripe age of eighty (80) when Glazier became a criminal
> Graveyard Vandal who wrote:
>  >
> (1)
> On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in:
> https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J
> Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh
> when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert.
>  >
> Glazier's geriatric decay worsened, along with Glazier's chronic
> alcoholism and Glazier, the Olde Kacker, became a Coprophile
> IOW Glazier became a filthy Face Shitter at his age of 86, which
> Glazier proudly announced & posted...
>  >
> (2)
> On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, Jew-Swine Glazier
> said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>:
> Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser.
> For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser.
> Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after which...
>  >
> Glazier, the Criminal Graveyard Vandal & Face Shitter got even
> worse over the next year and at Glazier's age of 87, Glazier
> widened his piggish Face-shitting habit, as seen when Glazier
> threatened...
>  >
> (3)
> On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, as Swine Glazier wrote:
> Harlow HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
> & Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>: "I'll be sitting on your face
> to take a shit & say: "Open wide". Trebert.
>  >
> (4)
> The Criminal Swine Glazier refused to stop his practices & rejected
> to be taken down, because Glazier at his age of 87+, Swine Glazier
> labeled himself as "Siegman Fraud" which is synonym with "Bowel-
> movement, actually saying that __ "Glazier is a piece of shit"__.
> who, to boot, also announced that Glazier is a Transvestite who dons
> female dresses and a Sarah Palin mask, saying that he has "nice
> legs"...
>  >
> hanson wrote:
> Now Glazier, since you are a curse and an embarrassment, day-in
> and day-out, to every Jew everywhere, has it dawned on you
> sorry, geriatric Transie-Swine, that as soon as you have been
> "put away and under" Google will remove ALL YOUR posts from
> the USENET and the only thing that will remain and show your
> legacy, is because:
>  >
> Glazier the Swine fortunately posted:
> .... "hanson made me famous"....
>  >
> hanson wrote
> So, Glazier you swine you should be grateful to me & not wish
> me ill like you did above, in your sick hate mongering, since
> it is only because of hanson, that Web searches show for:
>>
> --- Swine Glazier G=EMC^2 Cretin ----            27'833 hits & rising
> --- reber g=emc^2 Face-shitter & Vandal ----   27'953 hits & rising
>>
> cuz of hanson's caring and loving administering badly needed
> <http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> to the mental
> cripple aka <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier>. ... Shalom
> Right or wrong its best to think in every direction(like me) Logic wins
> in the end. Short theory(few words) best. I liked Feynman,and fermi
> thinking best. Trebert

Hanson, Spin is IN!
Jewish thinking is always best because Jews hire analysts to straighten 
out the kinks in their brains. I think that's where you failed.

Remember Feynman was an imperial thinker because he played the conga 
drums (Idiot goy always call them "bongos"). Hanson, I'd love to see you 
straighten out your brain by beating on HVAC like he was bongos.

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558536

"benj" thye Divine Jew <none@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 03/02/2016 12:46 AM, hanson wrote:
>> <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> "reber g=emc^2" Full-Swine Glazier wrote:
>> "... Right or wrong its best to think in every direction(like me)
>> Logic wins in the end. Short theory(few words) best. I Trebert to
>> produce only"...  his daily load of Glazier's Gutter physics & his
>> Glazierola with which
>> :B::ert Glazier, the Hate monger, introduces himself with/as
>>>
>> :B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex &
>> :B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.."
>> :B:: "My Grandfathers had tails". -- Trebert
>> :B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert.
>> :B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew. I'm the only Jew that
>> :B:: got 2 form letters from two Popes". Bert
>> :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>>  >
>> :B:: "I'll be sitting on Benj's, Saul Levi's & HVAC's face
>> :B:: to take a shit & say: "Open your mouth wide".
>> :B:: "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And laugh".
>> :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>>>
>> :B:: "I'm M&M's Clueless Fuck-faced turd".Bert.
>> :B:: I'm "Siegman Fraud", "Bert, the Bowel Movement".
>> :B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world"
>> :B:: "Israel will drop its first H-bomb 'David' ". TreBert
>> :B:: __"I'm glad when war breaks out"__ Bert
>> :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>>  >
>> :B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and
>> :B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. "....
>> :B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur, carbon & iron together
>> :B:: to make gun powder" ... & "while I was in custody
>> :B:: of Osceola Sheriff Bob Hansel, for thieving, his
>> :B:: deputies beat the shit out of me. So I bought a
>> :B:: 357 magnum for death threats by Sheriff Bob.
>> :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>>  >
>> about which ....
>> Moderator General "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> aka
>> "Richard A." aka Harlow Campbell wrote:
>>>
>> "Bert, Seriously. You are the stupidest cocksucking
>> moron who ever came down the Mass Pike.
>> "Bert, you really are a pathetic excuse for a human
>> fucking being". "Bert is a racist. (And he's stupid too)"
>> "TreBert, you are one stupid cocksucker".
>> "Bert, does your stupidity know no bounds?"
>> "Bert, are the stupidest cocksucker on the planet."
>> "Spin THIS, Glazier, you fucking idiot." "Bert get
>> some spelling lessons, you feeble-minded fuck".
>> "Bert, your opinion doesn't count"
>> "Bert you are an idiot."
>> "Bert, you are a clueless cocksucker .... and "Bert
>> you are senile, dazed & confused. Fucked in the head.
>> "a trained cockroach is smarter than Bert"
>> "Bert, you should be arrested"
>> "Bert, I will call the police and tell them that your
>> van seems to be a center for drug activity in the
>> Wal-Mart parking lot".... .... about which....
>>  >
>> Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Glazier, your brain is entangles with a used garbage can.
>> Glazier, "Its a shame" that your science is far worse
>> than the man's on the street.
>> Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage.
>> reber, take your you know it all thinking to your grave .
>> reber, your horseshit gets old.Say hi to Allah for me.
>> reber, you don't believe in science.
>> Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup.
>> Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__.
>> Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!..
>>  >
>> Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Glazier, you are a spamming piece of shit...
>> Your Cocaine usage explains a lot of your posts.
>> You are drunk again. Give up and kill yourself.
>>  >
>> Astrophysicist "Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote:
>> GLAZIER YOU ARE A LAMEbrain PIECE OF SHIT!
>> Saul Levy
>>  >
>> Rocket Scientist Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Glazier, you are babbling desperately. Is it sympathy
>> or pity you're grasping for? Stop it, either way.
>>  >
>> benj" <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
>> One only has to read Glazier's posts to see when Bert was lobotomized.
>> But Herb found poster "Double-A" who likes to be like Glazier,
>> but "Alkie-Alkie" is another kook who is as dumb as Bert is!
>> Now they party and frolic!...still waiting "to be loved by all"...
>>  >
>> hanson wrote:
>> So Glazier, given your Jewish Superiority complex and
>> your IQ of 122 and you knowing how how everything works,
>> ... how come ended up shitting into a bucket in a 25 year
>> old van that you use as your residence on Wal-Mart's
>> Parking Lot? ..... .... What went wrong, Glazier?
>>  >
>> Now, Glazier consider "what will the say when Glazier dies?
>> Are they gonna say he was a kind man? He was a wise man?
>> He had plans? He has wisdom? .... BULLSHIT, MAN!"...
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TAixFYnDh4> [D]
>> BULLSHIT,... because Swine Glazier DOES have plans
>> which Glazier, the Swine, announced and posted at the
>> ripe age of eighty (80) when Glazier became a criminal
>> Graveyard Vandal who wrote:
>>  >
>> (1)
>> On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in:
>> https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J
>> Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh
>> when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert.
>>  >
>> Glazier's geriatric decay worsened, along with Glazier's chronic
>> alcoholism and Glazier, the Olde Kacker, became a Coprophile
>> IOW Glazier became a filthy Face Shitter at his age of 86, which
>> Glazier proudly announced & posted...
>>  >
>> (2)
>> On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, Jew-Swine Glazier
>> said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>:
>> Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser.
>> For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser.
>> Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after which...
>>  >
>> Glazier, the Criminal Graveyard Vandal & Face Shitter got even
>> worse over the next year and at Glazier's age of 87, Glazier
>> widened his piggish Face-shitting habit, as seen when Glazier
>> threatened...
>>  >
>> (3)
>> On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, as Swine Glazier wrote:
>> Harlow HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
>> & Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>: "I'll be sitting on your face
>> to take a shit & say: "Open wide". Trebert.
>>  >
>> (4)
>> The Criminal Swine Glazier refused to stop his practices & rejected
>> to be taken down, because Glazier at his age of 87+, Swine Glazier
>> labeled himself as "Siegman Fraud" which is synonym with "Bowel-
>> movement, actually saying that __ "Glazier is a piece of shit"__.
>> who, to boot, also announced that Glazier is a Transvestite who dons
>> female dresses and a Sarah Palin mask, saying that he has "nice
>> legs"...
>>  >
>> hanson wrote:
>> Now Glazier, since you are a curse and an embarrassment, day-in
>> and day-out, to every Jew everywhere, has it dawned on you
>> sorry, geriatric Transie-Swine, that as soon as you have been
>> "put away and under" Google will remove ALL YOUR posts from
>> the USENET and the only thing that will remain and show your
>> legacy, is because:
>>  >
>> Glazier the Swine fortunately posted:
>> .... "hanson made me famous"....
>>  >
>> hanson wrote
>> So, Glazier you swine you should be grateful to me & not wish
>> me ill like you did above, in your sick hate mongering, since
>> it is only because of hanson, that Web searches show for:
>>>
>> --- Swine Glazier G=EMC^2 Cretin ----            27'833 hits & rising
>> --- reber g=emc^2 Face-shitter & Vandal ----   27'953 hits & rising
>>>
>> cuz of hanson's caring and loving administering badly needed
>> <http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> to the mental
>> cripple aka <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier>. ... Shalom
>> Right or wrong its best to think in every direction(like me) Logic wins
>> in the end. Short theory(few words) best. I liked Feynman,and fermi
>> thinking best. Trebert
>
"benj" the Divine Jacoby <nobody@gmail.com> wrote on
Feb 24 in Re: HVAC won't watch the Boyd Bushman video.
"Yup, I'm black, Jewish, Catholic and Muslim. And not only that
I believe in ghosts! & I hate Libs too"... and now Benj says:
>
> Hanson, Spin is IN!
> Jewish thinking is always best because Jews hire analysts to straighten 
> out the kinks in their brains. I think that's where you failed.
>
> Remember Feynman was an imperial thinker because he played the conga drums 
> (Idiot goy always call them "bongos"). Hanson, I'd love to see you 
> straighten out your brain by beating on HVAC like he was bongos.
>
hanson wrote:
What you say, really, is that you love to chew on the shit that
Full swine Glazier squeezed into your "kisser". You are a Swine
like Glazier, and a Divine Swine at that since you ||BJ:||...
>
"benj" the Divine Jacoby <nobody@gmail.com> posted  in his
Abrahamic glory that his holy Talmud says:
>
||BJ:|| Jews may rob and kill non-Jews (Sanhedrin 57a)
||BJ:|| Murdering Goyim is like killing wild animals (Sanhedrin 59a)
||BJ:|| Jews may lie to non-Jews (Baba Kamma 113a)
||BJ:|| It's OK for Jews to cheat non-Jews (Sanhedrin 57a)
||BJ:|| Jews may steal from non-Jews (Baba Mezia 24a)
||BJ:|| Non-Jewish children are sub-human (Yebamoth 98a)
||BJ:|| Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted
||BJ:|| if she is three years of age (Yebhamoth 11b)
||BJ:|| Gentiles prefer sex with cows! (Abodah Zarah 22a-22b)
||BJ:|| Jews are divine (Sanhedrin 58b)
##   Jews are divine (Sanhedrin 58b)
##   Jews are divine (Sanhedrin 58b)
||BJ:|| Jews are divine (Sanhedrin 58b)
>
which is in accord with the modern version that was
brilliantly expressed by the eminent the eminent Jewish
scholar Harold Wallace Rosenthal ||R:|| who said in his
epic <http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT>
>
||R:|| It's no secret that we Jews do not respect
||R:|| you gentiles. All of you are our enemies.
||R:|| Our Jewish beliefs are entirely different from yours.
||R:|| Our Talmud/Nedarim/Kol Nidre = "all vows" allows
||R:|| us Jews to lie, subvert and cheat you, the Goyim
>

>
>       ___           ___           ___            ___
>      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
>     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
>    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
>   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
>  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
>  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
>   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
>    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
>     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
>      ~~            \/__/         \/__/ 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558568

Bertard says
Right or wrong its best to think in every direction
-----------

Truly one of the most profoundly stupid statements you have ever made Bert. And that's saying a lot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558677

On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 7:22:19 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote:
> Bertard says
> Right or wrong its best to think in every direction
> -----------
> 
> Truly one of the most profoundly stupid statements you have ever made Bert. And that's saying a lot.

And yet, you are responding to it.  

Hmm.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558692

On 3/2/2016 3:33 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 7:22:19 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote:
>> Bertard says
>> Right or wrong its best to think in every direction
>> -----------
>>
>> Truly one of the most profoundly stupid statements you have ever made Bert. And that's saying a lot.
>
> And yet, you are responding to it.
>
> Hmm.
>

Bert is one of the more forward visionary and concise thinkers, his 
statements are heavy multi-dimensional thoughts and cover large areas.

HVAC is the benevolent moderator of sci.physics who's statements are 
guideposts for the future, and always insightfully true.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558703

On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 2:26:18 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote:
> On 3/2/2016 3:33 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 7:22:19 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote:
> >> Bertard says
> >> Right or wrong its best to think in every direction
> >> -----------
> >>
> >> Truly one of the most profoundly stupid statements you have ever made Bert. And that's saying a lot.
> >
> > And yet, you are responding to it.
> >
> > Hmm.
> >
> 
> Bert is one of the more forward visionary and concise thinkers, his 
> statements are heavy multi-dimensional thoughts and cover large areas.
> 
> HVAC is the benevolent moderator of sci.physics who's statements are 
> guideposts for the future, and always insightfully true.

you have a lot of free time on your hands, don't you.  

Are you in a facility?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558777

On 3/2/2016 4:45 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 2:26:18 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote:
>> On 3/2/2016 3:33 PM, James McGinn wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 7:22:19 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote:
>>>> Bertard says
>>>> Right or wrong its best to think in every direction
>>>> -----------
>>>>
>>>> Truly one of the most profoundly stupid statements you have ever made Bert. And that's saying a lot.
>>>
>>> And yet, you are responding to it.
>>>
>>> Hmm.
>>>
>>
>> Bert is one of the more forward visionary and concise thinkers, his
>> statements are heavy multi-dimensional thoughts and cover large areas.
>>
>> HVAC is the benevolent moderator of sci.physics who's statements are
>> guideposts for the future, and always insightfully true.
>
> you have a lot of paid time on your hands, don't you.
>

yes I am highly paid.

how is your water vapor doing ?  is Air a gas ?

how about nitrogen ?  you cannot see that either...

how did you get so bat shit crazy ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559682

McFly said
> Truly one of the most profoundly stupid statements you have ever made Bert. And that's saying a lot. 

And yet, you are responding to it.
-------------

Commenting on it... Not replying.

Smarten up, dummy   

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558698

On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 1:13:38 PM UTC-5, JM wrote:
> A great scientist was once asked how they know they've made a breakthrough.
>  Her response was illustrative.  She responded, "When everybody says you
> are wrong and nobody can explain why or how you are wrong."
> 
> The point is that often great scientific discoveries are concealed
> by group beliefs or myths.  
> 
> For example, []
Pons and Flieschmann?
Einstein?

Note in the first case, P&F tried but could never repeat their result. (Can you even show proof of 0% gaseous water in air?)

Note in the second case, more predictions of relativity are confirmed even 100 years later. (Well, Einstein is not batting 100%, but doing a hell of a lot better than you.)

Just because you are being told you are wrong does not mean you are right!


> 
> Stop whining and admit that you have no substantive dispute, you imbeciles.

Stop whining and admit that you have no evidence to be disputed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#567161

On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:13:38 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> A great scientist was once asked how they know they've made a breakthrough.  Her response was illustrative.  She responded, "When everybody says you are wrong and nobody can explain why or how you are wrong."
> 
> The point is that often great scientific discoveries are concealed by group beliefs or myths.  
> 
> For example, suppose we were to go back in time 200 years to any small town in Europe.  Suppose somebody scoured the bible and came to the conclusion that XXX was not shown to be wrong.  The person might then attempt to explain this to other people in the community.  At first he would find that person after person would tell him that he must be mistaken, they would tell him it is in the bible. If he pressed the issue people would become increasingly emotional (sound familiar).  Eventually a priest would get involved, present a sermon in which he (the priest) declared that he had examined the issue and found that XXX is actually in the bible.  The priest would then urge all the parishioners to ignore, or harass the "denier".  Eventually they might excommunicate or even murder this person.  
> 
> 
There is no gaseous H2O in earth's atmosphere.  Convection has nothing to do with atmospheric flow.  Meteorologists are ignorant about the physics of atmospheric flow.
> 
> The fact that you simpletons get all emotional and can't produce any substantive dispute with any of this shows that "cold steam" and convection are just group delusions.
> 
> Stop whining and admit that you have no substantive dispute, you imbeciles.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#568787

On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:13:38 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> A great scientist was once asked how they know they've made a breakthrough.  Her response was illustrative.  She responded, "When everybody says you are wrong and nobody can explain why or how you are wrong."
> 
> The point is that often great scientific discoveries are concealed by group beliefs or myths.  
> 
> For example, suppose we were to go back in time 200 years to any small town in Europe.  Suppose somebody scoured the bible and came to the conclusion that XXX was not shown to be wrong.  The person might then attempt to explain this to other people in the community.  At first he would find that person after person would tell him that he must be mistaken, they would tell him it is in the bible. If he pressed the issue people would become increasingly emotional (sound familiar).  Eventually a priest would get involved, present a sermon in which he (the priest) declared that he had examined the issue and found that XXX is actually in the bible.  The priest would then urge all the parishioners to ignore, or harass the "denier".  Eventually they might excommunicate or even murder this person.  
> 
> 
There is no gaseous H2O in earth's atmosphere.  Convection has nothing to do with atmospheric flow.  Meteorologists are ignorant about the physics of atmospheric flow.
> 
> The fact that you simpletons get all emotional and can't produce any substantive dispute with any of this shows that "cold steam" and convection are just group delusions.
> 
> Stop whining and admit that you have no substantive dispute, you imbeciles.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web