Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #570157 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-13 15:39 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-04-16 12:54 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 65 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-13 15:39 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 09:34 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 17:59 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:57 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 20:34 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 19:15 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 04:06 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 00:47 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 18:05 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 14:30 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 22:26 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 16:56 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 00:25 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 18:30 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 02:09 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 21:41 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 21:33 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 15:49 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 23:46 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 02:38 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 16:57 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 11:25 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 19:21 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 12:55 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 20:49 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 19:39 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-17 05:23 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 23:58 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-14 16:46 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 18:06 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 14:31 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 22:27 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 16:56 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 00:26 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 18:32 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 02:10 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 21:41 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 21:34 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 15:50 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 17:53 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:56 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 20:35 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 19:17 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 04:07 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 00:48 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 18:08 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 14:35 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 22:29 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 17:05 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 00:32 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 19:20 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 21:38 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 16:00 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 23:52 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 02:49 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 16:59 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 10:49 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 18:16 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 00:32 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-17 17:35 +0000
Name calling is allowed/expected. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-04-16 12:00 -0700
Re: Name calling is allowed/expected. benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-16 15:14 -0400
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 11:26 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 19:22 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 12:54 -0700
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 16:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ih7auc-2mk.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #570881 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>[rest of support request snipped] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim, do you have SUNWicu/SUNWicux installed and running? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If you are talking to me, of course, however the problem is NOT character >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>encoding nor is it Solaris specific. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The posts contain escape sequences. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim, you are apparently the only one seeing that. Where does that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you about the mostly likely source of the problem? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nope, I'm the only one talking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So everyone hates you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Voices in your head again. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. Voices in YOUR head, apparently. Why are you the only one >>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining, Jim? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>You mean why am I pointing it out? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No, I mean why do you think no one else is. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Well, primarily because the posts were responses to me. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Usenet ain't email, Jim. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>No shit, space cadet? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yeah, no shit, chimp. I only mentioned it because you seemed unaware, >>>>>>>>> what with your "the posts were response to me" comment. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Ever heard of threading, space cadet? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ever heard of brains, chimpshit? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>So I take it the answer is no, space cadet. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And this is how you get yourself in trouble, chimpshit. Making things >>>>> up and before you know it you think I've actually said it. >>>>> >>>> >>>>Babble, babble, babble. >>>> >>> >>> Probably the most sensible thing you've said in this whole blizzard of >>> chimpshit you've produced. >>> >>>>>>>>>>> And it's interesting that you didn't bring >>>>>>>>>>> it up until you'd lost your disagreement with him on the issues, don't >>>>>>>>>>> you think? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Nonsense; the very first thing I said was he had a character sequence >>>>>>>>>>instead of the character for a single quote. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But you're still ducking the real question, chimp. Why hasn't anyone >>>>>>>>> else mentioned it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Lots of reasons have already been given, space cadet. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Shucking and jiving to avoid answering. Your 'reasons' amount to >>>>>>> "because Jimp is SPECIAL and DIFFERENT". >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Why do you care so much about it? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Because I think it makes a very fine example of how you think. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>You mean it is a chance to be a school yard bully. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Awwww, is poor Jimp the Chimp feeling picked on NOW? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Nope, you try to bully everyone, I'm just one of the many in that >>>>>>>>regards. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you often think people are 'out to get you'? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Nope, nothing special about you; just another loud mouth bully. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Non sequitur. Care to try actually answering the question this time? >>>>> >>>>> Do you often think people are 'out to get you'? >>>> >>>>Babble, babble, babble. >>>> >>> >>> And chimpshit continues to dodge simple questions. >>> >> >>Why do you keep on insisting on answers to questions about things that >>have absolutely nothing to do with you other than to argue about the >>answers, space cadet? >> > > Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp. Why did you bring it up in a public > forum in the first place? Why do you keep talking about email when it has absolutely nothing to do with anything I, or anyone else, ever said? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 11:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5q05hbdbgepkt5kc7j4n5d16hivc31kfc0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #570945 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>[rest of support request snipped]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim, do you have SUNWicu/SUNWicux installed and running?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If you are talking to me, of course, however the problem is NOT character
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>encoding nor is it Solaris specific.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The posts contain escape sequences.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim, you are apparently the only one seeing that. Where does that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you about the mostly likely source of the problem?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nope, I'm the only one talking about it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So everyone hates you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Voices in your head again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. Voices in YOUR head, apparently. Why are you the only one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining, Jim?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>You mean why am I pointing it out?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I mean why do you think no one else is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well, primarily because the posts were responses to me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Usenet ain't email, Jim.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>No shit, space cadet?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, no shit, chimp. I only mentioned it because you seemed unaware,
>>>>>>>>>> what with your "the posts were response to me" comment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Ever heard of threading, space cadet?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ever heard of brains, chimpshit?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>So I take it the answer is no, space cadet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And this is how you get yourself in trouble, chimpshit. Making things
>>>>>> up and before you know it you think I've actually said it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Babble, babble, babble.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Probably the most sensible thing you've said in this whole blizzard of
>>>> chimpshit you've produced.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And it's interesting that you didn't bring
>>>>>>>>>>>> it up until you'd lost your disagreement with him on the issues, don't
>>>>>>>>>>>> you think?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Nonsense; the very first thing I said was he had a character sequence
>>>>>>>>>>>instead of the character for a single quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But you're still ducking the real question, chimp. Why hasn't anyone
>>>>>>>>>> else mentioned it?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Lots of reasons have already been given, space cadet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Shucking and jiving to avoid answering. Your 'reasons' amount to
>>>>>>>> "because Jimp is SPECIAL and DIFFERENT".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why do you care so much about it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I think it makes a very fine example of how you think.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>You mean it is a chance to be a school yard bully.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Awwww, is poor Jimp the Chimp feeling picked on NOW?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Nope, you try to bully everyone, I'm just one of the many in that
>>>>>>>>>regards.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you often think people are 'out to get you'?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Nope, nothing special about you; just another loud mouth bully.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Non sequitur. Care to try actually answering the question this time?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you often think people are 'out to get you'?
>>>>>
>>>>>Babble, babble, babble.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And chimpshit continues to dodge simple questions.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Why do you keep on insisting on answers to questions about things that
>>>have absolutely nothing to do with you other than to argue about the
>>>answers, space cadet?
>>>
>>
>> Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp. Why did you bring it up in a public
>> forum in the first place?
>
>Why do you keep talking about email when it has absolutely nothing to
>do with anything I, or anyone else, ever said?
>
Gods, but you're remarkably stupid!
--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
only stupid."
-- Heinrich Heine
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 19:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <4vfauc-4gl.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #570973 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>[rest of support request snipped] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim, do you have SUNWicu/SUNWicux installed and running? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If you are talking to me, of course, however the problem is NOT character >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>encoding nor is it Solaris specific. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The posts contain escape sequences. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim, you are apparently the only one seeing that. Where does that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you about the mostly likely source of the problem? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nope, I'm the only one talking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So everyone hates you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Voices in your head again. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. Voices in YOUR head, apparently. Why are you the only one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining, Jim? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>You mean why am I pointing it out? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I mean why do you think no one else is. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well, primarily because the posts were responses to me. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Usenet ain't email, Jim. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>No shit, space cadet? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, no shit, chimp. I only mentioned it because you seemed unaware, >>>>>>>>>>> what with your "the posts were response to me" comment. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Ever heard of threading, space cadet? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ever heard of brains, chimpshit? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>So I take it the answer is no, space cadet. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And this is how you get yourself in trouble, chimpshit. Making things >>>>>>> up and before you know it you think I've actually said it. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Babble, babble, babble. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Probably the most sensible thing you've said in this whole blizzard of >>>>> chimpshit you've produced. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And it's interesting that you didn't bring >>>>>>>>>>>>> it up until you'd lost your disagreement with him on the issues, don't >>>>>>>>>>>>> you think? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Nonsense; the very first thing I said was he had a character sequence >>>>>>>>>>>>instead of the character for a single quote. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But you're still ducking the real question, chimp. Why hasn't anyone >>>>>>>>>>> else mentioned it? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Lots of reasons have already been given, space cadet. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Shucking and jiving to avoid answering. Your 'reasons' amount to >>>>>>>>> "because Jimp is SPECIAL and DIFFERENT". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why do you care so much about it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I think it makes a very fine example of how you think. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>You mean it is a chance to be a school yard bully. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Awwww, is poor Jimp the Chimp feeling picked on NOW? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Nope, you try to bully everyone, I'm just one of the many in that >>>>>>>>>>regards. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do you often think people are 'out to get you'? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Nope, nothing special about you; just another loud mouth bully. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Non sequitur. Care to try actually answering the question this time? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you often think people are 'out to get you'? >>>>>> >>>>>>Babble, babble, babble. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And chimpshit continues to dodge simple questions. >>>>> >>>> >>>>Why do you keep on insisting on answers to questions about things that >>>>have absolutely nothing to do with you other than to argue about the >>>>answers, space cadet? >>>> >>> >>> Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp. Why did you bring it up in a public >>> forum in the first place? >> >>Why do you keep talking about email when it has absolutely nothing to >>do with anything I, or anyone else, ever said? >> > > Gods, but you're remarkably stupid! Racist deniers aren't worth talking to. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 12:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c465hb92kq1dmo92brn5b8adivdnbqi5sr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #570995 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>[rest of support request snipped] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim, do you have SUNWicu/SUNWicux installed and running? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If you are talking to me, of course, however the problem is NOT character >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>encoding nor is it Solaris specific. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The posts contain escape sequences. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim, you are apparently the only one seeing that. Where does that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you about the mostly likely source of the problem? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nope, I'm the only one talking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So everyone hates you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Voices in your head again. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. Voices in YOUR head, apparently. Why are you the only one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining, Jim? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You mean why am I pointing it out? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I mean why do you think no one else is. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well, primarily because the posts were responses to me. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Usenet ain't email, Jim. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>No shit, space cadet? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, no shit, chimp. I only mentioned it because you seemed unaware, >>>>>>>>>>>> what with your "the posts were response to me" comment. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Ever heard of threading, space cadet? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ever heard of brains, chimpshit? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>So I take it the answer is no, space cadet. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And this is how you get yourself in trouble, chimpshit. Making things >>>>>>>> up and before you know it you think I've actually said it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Babble, babble, babble. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Probably the most sensible thing you've said in this whole blizzard of >>>>>> chimpshit you've produced. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And it's interesting that you didn't bring >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it up until you'd lost your disagreement with him on the issues, don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you think? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Nonsense; the very first thing I said was he had a character sequence >>>>>>>>>>>>>instead of the character for a single quote. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But you're still ducking the real question, chimp. Why hasn't anyone >>>>>>>>>>>> else mentioned it? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Lots of reasons have already been given, space cadet. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Shucking and jiving to avoid answering. Your 'reasons' amount to >>>>>>>>>> "because Jimp is SPECIAL and DIFFERENT". >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why do you care so much about it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I think it makes a very fine example of how you think. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>You mean it is a chance to be a school yard bully. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Awwww, is poor Jimp the Chimp feeling picked on NOW? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Nope, you try to bully everyone, I'm just one of the many in that >>>>>>>>>>>regards. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Do you often think people are 'out to get you'? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Nope, nothing special about you; just another loud mouth bully. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Non sequitur. Care to try actually answering the question this time? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you often think people are 'out to get you'? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Babble, babble, babble. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And chimpshit continues to dodge simple questions. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Why do you keep on insisting on answers to questions about things that >>>>>have absolutely nothing to do with you other than to argue about the >>>>>answers, space cadet? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp. Why did you bring it up in a public >>>> forum in the first place? >>> >>>Why do you keep talking about email when it has absolutely nothing to >>>do with anything I, or anyone else, ever said? >>> >> >> Gods, but you're remarkably stupid! > >Racist deniers aren't worth talking to. > Yet here you are, lying like the sack of shit that you are.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 20:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <53lauc-10m.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #571005 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>[rest of support request snipped] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim, do you have SUNWicu/SUNWicux installed and running? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If you are talking to me, of course, however the problem is NOT character >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>encoding nor is it Solaris specific. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The posts contain escape sequences. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim, you are apparently the only one seeing that. Where does that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you about the mostly likely source of the problem? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nope, I'm the only one talking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So everyone hates you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Voices in your head again. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. Voices in YOUR head, apparently. Why are you the only one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining, Jim? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You mean why am I pointing it out? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I mean why do you think no one else is. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well, primarily because the posts were responses to me. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Usenet ain't email, Jim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>No shit, space cadet? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, no shit, chimp. I only mentioned it because you seemed unaware, >>>>>>>>>>>>> what with your "the posts were response to me" comment. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Ever heard of threading, space cadet? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ever heard of brains, chimpshit? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>So I take it the answer is no, space cadet. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And this is how you get yourself in trouble, chimpshit. Making things >>>>>>>>> up and before you know it you think I've actually said it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Babble, babble, babble. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Probably the most sensible thing you've said in this whole blizzard of >>>>>>> chimpshit you've produced. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And it's interesting that you didn't bring >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it up until you'd lost your disagreement with him on the issues, don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you think? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nonsense; the very first thing I said was he had a character sequence >>>>>>>>>>>>>>instead of the character for a single quote. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But you're still ducking the real question, chimp. Why hasn't anyone >>>>>>>>>>>>> else mentioned it? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Lots of reasons have already been given, space cadet. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Shucking and jiving to avoid answering. Your 'reasons' amount to >>>>>>>>>>> "because Jimp is SPECIAL and DIFFERENT". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why do you care so much about it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I think it makes a very fine example of how you think. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>You mean it is a chance to be a school yard bully. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Awwww, is poor Jimp the Chimp feeling picked on NOW? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Nope, you try to bully everyone, I'm just one of the many in that >>>>>>>>>>>>regards. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Do you often think people are 'out to get you'? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Nope, nothing special about you; just another loud mouth bully. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Non sequitur. Care to try actually answering the question this time? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do you often think people are 'out to get you'? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Babble, babble, babble. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And chimpshit continues to dodge simple questions. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Why do you keep on insisting on answers to questions about things that >>>>>>have absolutely nothing to do with you other than to argue about the >>>>>>answers, space cadet? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp. Why did you bring it up in a public >>>>> forum in the first place? >>>> >>>>Why do you keep talking about email when it has absolutely nothing to >>>>do with anything I, or anyone else, ever said? >>>> >>> >>> Gods, but you're remarkably stupid! >> >>Racist deniers aren't worth talking to. >> > > Yet here you are, lying like the sack of shit that you are. Is is obvious you concider the indidinous peoples of the Americas to be wogs and you are in denial of what happened to them. Racist deniers aren't worth talking to. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 19:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <eot5hbtu1mr36bj0nkv8eo9po30vabdeqj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #571033 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>[rest of support request snipped]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim, do you have SUNWicu/SUNWicux installed and running?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If you are talking to me, of course, however the problem is NOT character
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>encoding nor is it Solaris specific.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The posts contain escape sequences.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim, you are apparently the only one seeing that. Where does that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you about the mostly likely source of the problem?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nope, I'm the only one talking about it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So everyone hates you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Voices in your head again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. Voices in YOUR head, apparently. Why are you the only one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining, Jim?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You mean why am I pointing it out?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I mean why do you think no one else is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well, primarily because the posts were responses to me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Usenet ain't email, Jim.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No shit, space cadet?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, no shit, chimp. I only mentioned it because you seemed unaware,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what with your "the posts were response to me" comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ever heard of threading, space cadet?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ever heard of brains, chimpshit?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>So I take it the answer is no, space cadet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And this is how you get yourself in trouble, chimpshit. Making things
>>>>>>>>>> up and before you know it you think I've actually said it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Babble, babble, babble.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Probably the most sensible thing you've said in this whole blizzard of
>>>>>>>> chimpshit you've produced.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And it's interesting that you didn't bring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it up until you'd lost your disagreement with him on the issues, don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nonsense; the very first thing I said was he had a character sequence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>instead of the character for a single quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But you're still ducking the real question, chimp. Why hasn't anyone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> else mentioned it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Lots of reasons have already been given, space cadet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Shucking and jiving to avoid answering. Your 'reasons' amount to
>>>>>>>>>>>> "because Jimp is SPECIAL and DIFFERENT".
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why do you care so much about it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I think it makes a very fine example of how you think.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You mean it is a chance to be a school yard bully.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awwww, is poor Jimp the Chimp feeling picked on NOW?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nope, you try to bully everyone, I'm just one of the many in that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>regards.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you often think people are 'out to get you'?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Nope, nothing special about you; just another loud mouth bully.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur. Care to try actually answering the question this time?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you often think people are 'out to get you'?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Babble, babble, babble.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And chimpshit continues to dodge simple questions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Why do you keep on insisting on answers to questions about things that
>>>>>>>have absolutely nothing to do with you other than to argue about the
>>>>>>>answers, space cadet?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp. Why did you bring it up in a public
>>>>>> forum in the first place?
>>>>>
>>>>>Why do you keep talking about email when it has absolutely nothing to
>>>>>do with anything I, or anyone else, ever said?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gods, but you're remarkably stupid!
>>>
>>>Racist deniers aren't worth talking to.
>>>
>>
>> Yet here you are, lying like the sack of shit that you are.
>>
>
>Is is obvious you concider the indidinous peoples of the Americas to
>be wogs and you are in denial of what happened to them.
>
It seems like many things are 'obvious' to you that aren't in precise
1:1 accord with our present reality. It's a product of you being so
pathologically opinionated.
>Racist deniers aren't worth talking to.
Yet here you are, lying like the sack of shit that you are.
--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
only stupid."
-- Heinrich Heine
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-17 05:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <t7jbuc-lvo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #571084 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>[rest of support request snipped] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim, do you have SUNWicu/SUNWicux installed and running? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If you are talking to me, of course, however the problem is NOT character >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>encoding nor is it Solaris specific. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The posts contain escape sequences. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim, you are apparently the only one seeing that. Where does that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you about the mostly likely source of the problem? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nope, I'm the only one talking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So everyone hates you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Voices in your head again. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. Voices in YOUR head, apparently. Why are you the only one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining, Jim? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You mean why am I pointing it out? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I mean why do you think no one else is. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well, primarily because the posts were responses to me. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Usenet ain't email, Jim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No shit, space cadet? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, no shit, chimp. I only mentioned it because you seemed unaware, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what with your "the posts were response to me" comment. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ever heard of threading, space cadet? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ever heard of brains, chimpshit? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>So I take it the answer is no, space cadet. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And this is how you get yourself in trouble, chimpshit. Making things >>>>>>>>>>> up and before you know it you think I've actually said it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Babble, babble, babble. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Probably the most sensible thing you've said in this whole blizzard of >>>>>>>>> chimpshit you've produced. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And it's interesting that you didn't bring >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it up until you'd lost your disagreement with him on the issues, don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you think? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nonsense; the very first thing I said was he had a character sequence >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>instead of the character for a single quote. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But you're still ducking the real question, chimp. Why hasn't anyone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> else mentioned it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Lots of reasons have already been given, space cadet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Shucking and jiving to avoid answering. Your 'reasons' amount to >>>>>>>>>>>>> "because Jimp is SPECIAL and DIFFERENT". >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why do you care so much about it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I think it makes a very fine example of how you think. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You mean it is a chance to be a school yard bully. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awwww, is poor Jimp the Chimp feeling picked on NOW? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nope, you try to bully everyone, I'm just one of the many in that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>regards. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you often think people are 'out to get you'? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Nope, nothing special about you; just another loud mouth bully. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur. Care to try actually answering the question this time? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Do you often think people are 'out to get you'? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Babble, babble, babble. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And chimpshit continues to dodge simple questions. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Why do you keep on insisting on answers to questions about things that >>>>>>>>have absolutely nothing to do with you other than to argue about the >>>>>>>>answers, space cadet? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp. Why did you bring it up in a public >>>>>>> forum in the first place? >>>>>> >>>>>>Why do you keep talking about email when it has absolutely nothing to >>>>>>do with anything I, or anyone else, ever said? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Gods, but you're remarkably stupid! >>>> >>>>Racist deniers aren't worth talking to. >>>> >>> >>> Yet here you are, lying like the sack of shit that you are. >>> >> >>Is is obvious you concider the indidinous peoples of the Americas to >>be wogs and you are in denial of what happened to them. >> > > It seems like many things are 'obvious' to you that aren't in precise > 1:1 accord with our present reality. It's a product of you being so > pathologically opinionated. > >>Racist deniers aren't worth talking to. > > Yet here you are, lying like the sack of shit that you are. Is is obvious you concider the indiginous peoples of the Americas to be wogs and you are in denial of what happened to them. Racist deniers aren't worth talking to. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 23:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4vc6hbhhp33vi7h7a0hprbdt87magl5k4p@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #571138 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>[rest of support request snipped]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim, do you have SUNWicu/SUNWicux installed and running?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If you are talking to me, of course, however the problem is NOT character
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>encoding nor is it Solaris specific.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The posts contain escape sequences.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim, you are apparently the only one seeing that. Where does that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you about the mostly likely source of the problem?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nope, I'm the only one talking about it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So everyone hates you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Voices in your head again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. Voices in YOUR head, apparently. Why are you the only one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining, Jim?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You mean why am I pointing it out?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I mean why do you think no one else is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well, primarily because the posts were responses to me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Usenet ain't email, Jim.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No shit, space cadet?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, no shit, chimp. I only mentioned it because you seemed unaware,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what with your "the posts were response to me" comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ever heard of threading, space cadet?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ever heard of brains, chimpshit?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>So I take it the answer is no, space cadet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And this is how you get yourself in trouble, chimpshit. Making things
>>>>>>>>>>>> up and before you know it you think I've actually said it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Babble, babble, babble.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Probably the most sensible thing you've said in this whole blizzard of
>>>>>>>>>> chimpshit you've produced.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And it's interesting that you didn't bring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it up until you'd lost your disagreement with him on the issues, don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nonsense; the very first thing I said was he had a character sequence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>instead of the character for a single quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But you're still ducking the real question, chimp. Why hasn't anyone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> else mentioned it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Lots of reasons have already been given, space cadet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shucking and jiving to avoid answering. Your 'reasons' amount to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "because Jimp is SPECIAL and DIFFERENT".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why do you care so much about it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I think it makes a very fine example of how you think.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You mean it is a chance to be a school yard bully.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awwww, is poor Jimp the Chimp feeling picked on NOW?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nope, you try to bully everyone, I'm just one of the many in that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>regards.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you often think people are 'out to get you'?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nope, nothing special about you; just another loud mouth bully.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur. Care to try actually answering the question this time?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you often think people are 'out to get you'?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Babble, babble, babble.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And chimpshit continues to dodge simple questions.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Why do you keep on insisting on answers to questions about things that
>>>>>>>>>have absolutely nothing to do with you other than to argue about the
>>>>>>>>>answers, space cadet?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp. Why did you bring it up in a public
>>>>>>>> forum in the first place?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Why do you keep talking about email when it has absolutely nothing to
>>>>>>>do with anything I, or anyone else, ever said?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gods, but you're remarkably stupid!
>>>>>
>>>>>Racist deniers aren't worth talking to.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yet here you are, lying like the sack of shit that you are.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Is is obvious you concider the indidinous peoples of the Americas to
>>>be wogs and you are in denial of what happened to them.
>>>
>>
>> It seems like many things are 'obvious' to you that aren't in precise
>> 1:1 accord with our present reality. It's a product of you being so
>> pathologically opinionated.
>>
>>>Racist deniers aren't worth talking to.
>>
>> Yet here you are, lying like the sack of shit that you are.
>
>
>Is is obvious you concider the indiginous peoples of the Americas to
>be wogs and you are in denial of what happened to them.
>
It seems like many things are 'obvious' to you that aren't in precise
1:1 accord with our present reality. It's a product of you being so
pathologically opinionated.
>
>Racist deniers aren't worth talking to.
>
Yet here you are, lying like the sack of shit that you are.
--
"You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of
your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear."
-- Mark Twain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 16:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <neohi2$me$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #570320 |
For your reference, records indicate that Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > And that is a pretty strong indicator that the problem is > with you receiving rather than him sending. Indeed. Instead of telling us how *we* can see the escape sequences on *our* machines, he just won’t stop complaining about what *his* setup is doing. I still haven’t gotten a check, so he’s on his own when it comes to debugging that. -- "Also . . . I can kill you with my brain." River Tam, Trash, Firefly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 18:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mq25uc-nl3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #570446 |
In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: > For your reference, records indicate that > Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > >> And that is a pretty strong indicator that the problem is >> with you receiving rather than him sending. > > Indeed. Instead of telling us how *we* can see the escape sequences > on *our* machines, he just won’t stop complaining about what *his* > setup is doing. I still haven’t gotten a check, so he’s on his own > when it comes to debugging that. *PLONK* Problem solved. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 14:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5130hbdokjnh1k2adin6k28562g2i6mmtj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #570473 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>> For your reference, records indicate that
>> Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> And that is a pretty strong indicator that the problem is
>>> with you receiving rather than him sending.
>>
>> Indeed. Instead of telling us how *we* can see the escape sequences
>> on *our* machines, he just won’t stop complaining about what *his*
>> setup is doing. I still haven’t gotten a check, so he’s on his own
>> when it comes to debugging that.
>>
>
>*PLONK*
>
>Problem solved.
>
<snicker>
--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 22:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <33i5uc-r65.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #570529 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>> For your reference, records indicate that >>> Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> And that is a pretty strong indicator that the problem is >>>> with you receiving rather than him sending. >>> >>> Indeed. Instead of telling us how *we* can see the escape sequences >>> on *our* machines, he just won?t stop complaining about what *his* >>> setup is doing. I still haven?t gotten a check, so he?s on his own >>> when it comes to debugging that. >>> >> >>*PLONK* >> >>Problem solved. >> > > <snicker> QED again. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 16:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ugb0hbdprqoiqj291a81d86frj4qhvoopo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #570548 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>> For your reference, records indicate that >>>> Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> And that is a pretty strong indicator that the problem is >>>>> with you receiving rather than him sending. >>>> >>>> Indeed. Instead of telling us how *we* can see the escape sequences >>>> on *our* machines, he just won?t stop complaining about what *his* >>>> setup is doing. I still haven?t gotten a check, so he?s on his own >>>> when it comes to debugging that. >>>> >>> >>>*PLONK* >>> >>>Problem solved. >>> >> >> <snicker> > >QED again. > Yes, it is funny how you keep needing that last word. -- You are What you do When it counts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 00:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <92p5uc-816.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #570582 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>> For your reference, records indicate that >>>>> Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> And that is a pretty strong indicator that the problem is >>>>>> with you receiving rather than him sending. >>>>> >>>>> Indeed. Instead of telling us how *we* can see the escape sequences >>>>> on *our* machines, he just won?t stop complaining about what *his* >>>>> setup is doing. I still haven?t gotten a check, so he?s on his own >>>>> when it comes to debugging that. >>>>> >>>> >>>>*PLONK* >>>> >>>>Problem solved. >>>> >>> >>> <snicker> >> >>QED again. >> > > Yes, it is funny how you keep needing that last word. QED -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 18:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <t2h0hb9o8aa1pvllrpqn4mb53rh43d0fd8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #570598 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that
>>>>>> Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And that is a pretty strong indicator that the problem is
>>>>>>> with you receiving rather than him sending.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Indeed. Instead of telling us how *we* can see the escape sequences
>>>>>> on *our* machines, he just won?t stop complaining about what *his*
>>>>>> setup is doing. I still haven?t gotten a check, so he?s on his own
>>>>>> when it comes to debugging that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>*PLONK*
>>>>>
>>>>>Problem solved.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <snicker>
>>>
>>>QED again.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, it is funny how you keep needing that last word.
>
>QED
>
And Jimp the Chimp continues to demonstrate my point about him. It's
embarrassing for him...
--
"Adrenaline is like exercise, but without the excessive gym fees."
-- Professor Walsh, "Buffy the Vampire Slayer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 02:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n5v5uc-7l6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #570617 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that >>>>>>> Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And that is a pretty strong indicator that the problem is >>>>>>>> with you receiving rather than him sending. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Indeed. Instead of telling us how *we* can see the escape sequences >>>>>>> on *our* machines, he just won?t stop complaining about what *his* >>>>>>> setup is doing. I still haven?t gotten a check, so he?s on his own >>>>>>> when it comes to debugging that. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>*PLONK* >>>>>> >>>>>>Problem solved. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>>QED again. >>>> >>> >>> Yes, it is funny how you keep needing that last word. >> >>QED >> > > And Jimp the Chimp continues to demonstrate my point about him. It's > embarrassing for him... QED -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 21:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <k7s0hb1os9e9e7t9apsslosllqenru60t6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #570625 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that
>>>>>>>> Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And that is a pretty strong indicator that the problem is
>>>>>>>>> with you receiving rather than him sending.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Indeed. Instead of telling us how *we* can see the escape sequences
>>>>>>>> on *our* machines, he just won?t stop complaining about what *his*
>>>>>>>> setup is doing. I still haven?t gotten a check, so he?s on his own
>>>>>>>> when it comes to debugging that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>*PLONK*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Problem solved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snicker>
>>>>>
>>>>>QED again.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it is funny how you keep needing that last word.
>>>
>>>QED
>>>
>>
>> And Jimp the Chimp continues to demonstrate my point about him. It's
>> embarrassing for him...
>
>QED
>
And Jimp the Chimp continues to demonstrate my point about him. It's
embarrassing for him...
--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 21:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2c38uc-jfd.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #570652 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that >>>>>>>>> Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And that is a pretty strong indicator that the problem is >>>>>>>>>> with you receiving rather than him sending. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Indeed. Instead of telling us how *we* can see the escape sequences >>>>>>>>> on *our* machines, he just won?t stop complaining about what *his* >>>>>>>>> setup is doing. I still haven?t gotten a check, so he?s on his own >>>>>>>>> when it comes to debugging that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>*PLONK* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Problem solved. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <snicker> >>>>>> >>>>>>QED again. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yes, it is funny how you keep needing that last word. >>>> >>>>QED >>>> >>> >>> And Jimp the Chimp continues to demonstrate my point about him. It's >>> embarrassing for him... >> >>QED >> > > And Jimp the Chimp continues to demonstrate my point about him. It's > embarrassing for him... Babble, babble, babble. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 15:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <m0s2hbp8dk2i6ju5afptcpuhqoh8r0qupv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #570782 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that
>>>>>>>>>> Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And that is a pretty strong indicator that the problem is
>>>>>>>>>>> with you receiving rather than him sending.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Indeed. Instead of telling us how *we* can see the escape sequences
>>>>>>>>>> on *our* machines, he just won?t stop complaining about what *his*
>>>>>>>>>> setup is doing. I still haven?t gotten a check, so he?s on his own
>>>>>>>>>> when it comes to debugging that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>*PLONK*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Problem solved.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <snicker>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>QED again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, it is funny how you keep needing that last word.
>>>>>
>>>>>QED
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And Jimp the Chimp continues to demonstrate my point about him. It's
>>>> embarrassing for him...
>>>
>>>QED
>>>
>>
>> And Jimp the Chimp continues to demonstrate my point about him. It's
>> embarrassing for him...
>>
>
>Babble, babble, babble.
>
Most sensible remark we've had from chimpshit in a while.
--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
only stupid."
-- Heinrich Heine
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 17:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cmd2uc-qvn.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #570157 |
In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: > For your reference, records indicate that > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >> > >> > I really can’t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself >> > into. You’ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support. >> > :-) >> > >> >> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue. > > [rest of support request snipped] > > Have you sent me a check? If so, you’re going to have to wait until I > can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere. The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't adhere to the RFC. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web