Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #526176 > unrolled thread

For the jimp | Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  For the jimp | Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 15:58 -0500
    Re: For the jimp | Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-14 21:11 +0000
      Re: For the jimp | Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 18:15 -0500
        Re: For the jimp | Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-14 23:23 +0000
          Re: For the jimp | Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 22:27 -0500
            Re: For the jimp | Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-15 05:37 +0000
            Re: For the jimp | Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study Euclid Baumann <eubaum@parallelnetwork.org> - 2015-10-15 16:35 +0000
    Re: For the jimp | Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 19:28 -0400

#526176 — For the jimp | Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study

Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study
> http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-hiatus-never-happened-says-study.html

> Abstract
>
> The reported “hiatus” in the warming of the global climate system
> during this century has been the subject of intense scientific and
> public debate, with implications ranging from scientific
> understanding of the global climate sensitivity to the rate in which
> greenhouse gas emissions would need to be curbed in order to meet the
> United Nations global warming target. A number of scientific
> hypotheses have been put forward to explain the hiatus, including
> both physical climate processes and data artifacts. However, despite
> the intense focus on the hiatus in both the scientific and public
> arenas, rigorous statistical assessment of the uniqueness of the
> recent temperature time-series within the context of the long-term
> record has been limited. We apply a rigorous, comprehensive
> statistical analysis of global temperature data that goes beyond
> simple linear models to account for temporal dependence and selection
> effects. We use this framework to test whether the recent period has
> demonstrated i) a hiatus in the trend in global temperatures, ii) a
> temperature trend that is statistically distinct from trends prior to
> the hiatus period, iii) a “stalling” of the global mean temperature,
> and iv) a change in the distribution of the year-to-year temperature
> increases. We find compelling evidence that recent claims of a
> “hiatus” in global warming lack sound scientific basis. Our analysis
> reveals that there is no hiatus in the increase in the global mean
> temperature, no statistically significant difference in trends, no
> stalling of the global mean temperature, and no change in
> year-to-year temperature increases.
>
> Citation
>
> Debunking the climate hiatus by Bala Rajaratnam, Joseph Romano,
> Michael Tsiang and Noah S. Diffenbaugh published in Climatic Change
> doi:10.​1007/​s10584-015-1495-y
>

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#526182

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study

Total arm waving nonsense and off topic for a physics group, you
spamming piece of shit.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#526189

On 10/14/15 4:11 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study
>
> Total arm waving nonsense and off topic for a physics group, you
> spamming piece of shit.
>
>

   The physics of the earth and atmosphere is right on-topic, jimp, and
   continuing and better understanding of the processes is very timely.
   If you are going to comment on an article, at least read it first.

   Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study
> http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-hiatus-never-happened-says-study.html

 > Abstract
 >
 > The reported “hiatus” in the warming of the global climate system
 > during this century has been the subject of intense scientific and
 > public debate, with implications ranging from scientific
 > understanding of the global climate sensitivity to the rate in which
 > greenhouse gas emissions would need to be curbed in order to meet the
 > United Nations global warming target. A number of scientific
 > hypotheses have been put forward to explain the hiatus, including
 > both physical climate processes and data artifacts. However, despite
 > the intense focus on the hiatus in both the scientific and public
 > arenas, rigorous statistical assessment of the uniqueness of the
 > recent temperature time-series within the context of the long-term
 > record has been limited. We apply a rigorous, comprehensive
 > statistical analysis of global temperature data that goes beyond
 > simple linear models to account for temporal dependence and selection
 > effects. We use this framework to test whether the recent period has
 > demonstrated i) a hiatus in the trend in global temperatures, ii) a
 > temperature trend that is statistically distinct from trends prior to
 > the hiatus period, iii) a “stalling” of the global mean temperature,
 > and iv) a change in the distribution of the year-to-year temperature
 > increases. We find compelling evidence that recent claims of a
 > “hiatus” in global warming lack sound scientific basis. Our analysis
 > reveals that there is no hiatus in the increase in the global mean
 > temperature, no statistically significant difference in trends, no
 > stalling of the global mean temperature, and no change in
 > year-to-year temperature increases.
 >
 > Citation
 >
 > Debunking the climate hiatus by Bala Rajaratnam, Joseph Romano,
 > Michael Tsiang and Noah S. Diffenbaugh published in Climatic Change
 > doi:10.​1007/​s10584-015-1495-y


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#526196

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/14/15 4:11 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study
>>
>> Total arm waving nonsense and off topic for a physics group, you
>> spamming piece of shit.
>>
>>
> 
>   The physics of the earth and atmosphere is right on-topic,

Perhaps marginally, but this arm waving utter nonsense is not,
you spamming piece of shit ass hole.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#526215

On 10/14/15 6:23 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
> Perhaps marginally, but this arm waving utter nonsense is not,
> you spamming piece of shit ass hole.
>


   Now, now jimp, you forgot to pursue the Anger Management available
   in your area. See:
> http://www.yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes


   Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study
> http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-hiatus-never-happened-says-study.html

 > Abstract
 >
 > The reported “hiatus” in the warming of the global climate system
 > during this century has been the subject of intense scientific and
 > public debate, with implications ranging from scientific
 > understanding of the global climate sensitivity to the rate in which
 > greenhouse gas emissions would need to be curbed in order to meet the
 > United Nations global warming target. A number of scientific
 > hypotheses have been put forward to explain the hiatus, including
 > both physical climate processes and data artifacts. However, despite
 > the intense focus on the hiatus in both the scientific and public
 > arenas, rigorous statistical assessment of the uniqueness of the
 > recent temperature time-series within the context of the long-term
 > record has been limited. We apply a rigorous, comprehensive
 > statistical analysis of global temperature data that goes beyond
 > simple linear models to account for temporal dependence and selection
 > effects. We use this framework to test whether the recent period has
 > demonstrated i) a hiatus in the trend in global temperatures, ii) a
 > temperature trend that is statistically distinct from trends prior to
 > the hiatus period, iii) a “stalling” of the global mean temperature,
 > and iv) a change in the distribution of the year-to-year temperature
 > increases. We find compelling evidence that recent claims of a
 > “hiatus” in global warming lack sound scientific basis. Our analysis
 > reveals that there is no hiatus in the increase in the global mean
 > temperature, no statistically significant difference in trends, no
 > stalling of the global mean temperature, and no change in
 > year-to-year temperature increases.
 >
 > Citation
 >
 > Debunking the climate hiatus by Bala Rajaratnam, Joseph Romano,
 > Michael Tsiang and Noah S. Diffenbaugh published in Climatic Change
 > doi:10.​1007/​s10584-015-1495-y
 >



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#526254

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/14/15 6:23 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps marginally, but this arm waving utter nonsense is not,
>> you spamming piece of shit ass hole.
>>
> 
> 
>   Now, now jimp, you forgot to pursue the Anger Management available

Now, now, you worthless piece of spamming shit, you forgot to fuck
off and die, shit head.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#526268

Sam Wormley wrote:

>    Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study
>> http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-
warming-hiatus-never-happened-says-study.html

Your kind are so stupid they think co2 is detrimental and pollution. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#526192

On 10/14/2015 04:58 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study
>> http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-hiatus-never-happened-says-study.html
>>
>
>> Abstract
>>
>> The reported “hiatus” in the warming of the global climate system
>> during this century has been the subject of intense scientific and
>> public debate, with implications ranging from scientific
>> understanding of the global climate sensitivity to the rate in which
>> greenhouse gas emissions would need to be curbed in order to meet the
>> United Nations global warming target. A number of scientific
>> hypotheses have been put forward to explain the hiatus, including
>> both physical climate processes and data artifacts. However, despite
>> the intense focus on the hiatus in both the scientific and public
>> arenas, rigorous statistical assessment of the uniqueness of the
>> recent temperature time-series within the context of the long-term
>> record has been limited. We apply a rigorous, comprehensive
>> statistical analysis of global temperature data that goes beyond
>> simple linear models to account for temporal dependence and selection
>> effects. We use this framework to test whether the recent period has
>> demonstrated i) a hiatus in the trend in global temperatures, ii) a
>> temperature trend that is statistically distinct from trends prior to
>> the hiatus period, iii) a “stalling” of the global mean temperature,
>> and iv) a change in the distribution of the year-to-year temperature
>> increases. We find compelling evidence that recent claims of a
>> “hiatus” in global warming lack sound scientific basis. Our analysis
>> reveals that there is no hiatus in the increase in the global mean
>> temperature, no statistically significant difference in trends, no
>> stalling of the global mean temperature, and no change in
>> year-to-year temperature increases.
>>
>> Citation
>>
>> Debunking the climate hiatus by Bala Rajaratnam, Joseph Romano,
>> Michael Tsiang and Noah S. Diffenbaugh published in Climatic Change
>> doi:10.​1007/​s10584-015-1495-y

Whatever happened to the "scientific consensus" Sammy? How can the 
invented "hiatus" be the subject of " intense scientific and
public debate" when the science is settled? Sam, you are so dishonest 
and lie so much that even you can't remember what was the last lie you 
told and contradict yourself.

You are a spamming moron.



-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web