Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #562149 > unrolled thread
| Started by | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-13 13:42 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-04-12 09:42 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 161 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 13:42 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-13 16:58 -0500
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 23:14 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-13 20:59 -0500
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 11:06 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 11:29 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-16 17:37 -0500
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 04:34 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 21:24 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:43 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 22:12 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 07:07 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 00:37 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 16:24 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 09:32 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-14 12:55 -0500
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 19:17 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-14 21:15 +0000
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-15 05:27 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 00:52 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-15 16:52 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 17:43 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-16 05:34 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-16 11:37 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-16 17:09 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-16 15:12 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 05:50 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 16:19 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 13:06 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-18 05:32 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 06:19 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-18 14:16 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 17:24 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 02:08 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 05:52 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 17:14 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 18:24 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 02:44 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 11:50 -0700
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 03:05 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 13:53 -0700
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-20 20:40 +0000
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 13:51 -0700
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 20:31 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-20 20:46 +0000
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 04:52 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 05:52 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 15:56 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 16:46 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-21 11:21 -0600
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 02:12 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:31 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 16:19 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 15:45 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 09:36 -0600
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 17:50 +0000
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 16:34 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-21 09:26 +0000
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 16:09 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-21 09:35 -0600
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 13:02 -0400
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 02:17 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 06:01 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 16:09 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 16:46 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-21 15:38 +0000
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 12:57 -0400
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 13:22 -0400
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 13:29 -0400
oinky declareth noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 11:39 -0700
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-20 14:41 -0600
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 05:16 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-21 21:24 +0000
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 17:29 -0400
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 16:20 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 15:56 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-28 18:48 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-28 13:23 -0600
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-28 15:57 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-18 14:11 -0600
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-18 16:14 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 06:04 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 06:38 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-18 22:48 +0000
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 05:36 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 17:18 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 18:09 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-31 06:27 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-30 21:46 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-31 07:07 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-01 00:39 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-31 12:51 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-01 01:03 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-31 13:05 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-31 11:22 -0600
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-31 10:55 -0600
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-31 13:02 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-01 08:17 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-01 01:04 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-31 18:16 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-31 11:16 -0600
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-03-31 12:35 -0500
HOH noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 14:02 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 12:36 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 05:41 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 10:40 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 19:23 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 12:25 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 21:20 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 15:04 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 07:14 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 23:34 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 19:27 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-20 14:47 -0600
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 13:56 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-20 21:14 +0000
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 05:37 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 15:23 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 16:36 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-21 11:25 -0600
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:36 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 17:39 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 02:20 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:46 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 17:34 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 16:52 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 17:11 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-06 07:09 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 01:12 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-06 17:16 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 13:24 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-07 09:02 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 15:05 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-16 17:19 -0500
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 04:46 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 21:18 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-16 23:26 -0500
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 06:43 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 23:00 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 16:09 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 09:35 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 06:24 +0100
HOH vs OCO noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 10:52 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 22:57 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 16:41 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 02:24 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 11:25 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 06:17 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 22:51 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 15:56 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 10:00 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-26 06:58 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 14:09 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-28 08:19 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 01:22 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-28 17:39 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 10:11 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 07:36 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-28 13:22 -0600
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 06:54 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 09:42 -0700
Page 6 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 11:16 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <0qmqfbt3v3gq69t65p4hihbtnl7seju9pi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566966 |
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 01:04:39 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> wrote: >Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:39:34 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass >> <bender@the.future> wrote: >> >> >snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote: >> > >> >> Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >> >> >> >> > In article <e7b8bdc1305e50fdc37c6d892eab77a2@dizum.com>, >> >> > The Risible Mr Fakey, RMS <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> says... >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > Didn't I, now? >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > Did I, now? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Dance for Vallor! LOL, etc... (tm) >> >> > >> >> >> >> See The Risible Mr Fakey, RMS dance, striking sparks off the >> >> cobble stones in his size 13 steel toe-capped hobnail boots. >> > >> >I had to look up "risible". That's a great word for >> >fakey... always rising to the bait, making us <snicker>. >> >> Some would say we are being trolled, I say we have a new kicktoy. > >WHBT. But hey, it's just usenet. I like watching the levels fakey has dropped over the months. He used to think he was king, now he's fighting to keep his court jester status.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pandora <pandora@peak.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 12:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <McqdnRfrDaxvwmDLnZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@scnresearch.com> |
| In reply to | #566976 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:16:52 -0600, Skeet wrote: > On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 01:04:39 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass > <bender@the.future> wrote: > >>Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:39:34 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass >>> <bender@the.future> wrote: >>> >>> >snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote: >>> > >>> >> Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > In article <e7b8bdc1305e50fdc37c6d892eab77a2@dizum.com>, The >>> >> > Risible Mr Fakey, RMS <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> says... >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > > Didn't I, now? >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Did I, now? >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > Dance for Vallor! LOL, etc... (tm) >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> See The Risible Mr Fakey, RMS dance, striking sparks off the cobble >>> >> stones in his size 13 steel toe-capped hobnail boots. >>> > >>> >I had to look up "risible". That's a great word for fakey... always >>> >rising to the bait, making us <snicker>. >>> >>> Some would say we are being trolled, I say we have a new kicktoy. >> >>WHBT. But hey, it's just usenet. > > > I like watching the levels fakey has dropped over the months. He used to > think he was king, now he's fighting to keep his court jester status. Indeed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 14:02 -0700 |
| Subject | HOH |
| Message-ID | <b51ccd68-afcd-4afb-a7a4-cda558fbb160@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #562219 |
a droplet of two waters, is heavier than air; how do they dock > I will gladly make a retraction if anybody can definitively demonstrate that water remains gaseous at ambient temps and/or if moist air (all other things being equal) is lighter than dry air. > > Fair enough?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-18 12:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dfc64773-2dea-4efa-bfe9-e5d404d110d7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #562207 |
On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 8:45:06 PM UTC-7, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > Consequently meteorology's notion that storms > > are caused by the convective upwelling of gaseous H2O and subsequent > > release of "latent heat" is refuted. > > No, it's not "refuted", For most people it's unfalsyfiable in that the are intellectually incapable of making a distinction between gas and vapor (vapor being liquid suspended in air). Either way its pseudoscience. Nobody has ever produced evidence of gaseous H2O in our atmosphere. It's just a dumb thing that people believe. Kind of like the greenhouse effect. > Jim. Your saying so doesn't make it so. The fact that you resort to consensus to make your argument advertises the fact that empirically your argument is invalid. The fact that your only argument involve referencing people that made the same dumbass assumptions that you made is all the evidence necessary to substantiate that this is a group delusion. > Meanwhile, there are several satellites operated by several agencies > watching latent heat of condensation release from clouds, Jim. Why do > you continue to deny reality? LOL. So, publicly funded agencies are confirming the existence of something the public generally believes. Gee golly. I can't imagine how that can happen. If a public agency confirmed the existence of angels would you believe that? Ghosts? Bigfoot? Space aliens. Has it occurred to you that if you had a valid argument you would have no need to refer to consensus?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 05:41 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <3ad49b835fddde44c9f3f65bf1337c01@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #563476 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as Solving Tornadoes, in <news:dfc64773-2dea-4efa-bfe9-e5d404d110d7@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: Bwahahahaaa! I've got the kooktard James McGinn bleating all day as a desperate last-ditch attempt at defending his delusions... how's that working for you, Jim, you fucking moronic psychotic spankard? > On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 8:45:06 PM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>> Consequently meteorology's notion that storms >>> are caused by the convective upwelling of gaseous H2O and subsequent >>> release of "latent heat" is refuted. >> No, it's not "refuted", > For most people it's unfalsyfiable in that the are intellectually > incapable of making a distinction between gas and vapor (vapor > being liquid suspended in air). Either way its pseudoscience. > Nobody has ever produced evidence of gaseous H2O in our atmosphere. You mean this evidence, James? Water In The Gas Phase – http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3350649/ Not ab initio... direct measurement of monomolecular water in the gaseous phase. 16 referenced papers. Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research http://www.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/molecular_mechanism_of_water_evaporation Direct empirical observation of monomolecular evaporation. http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/6686/ Active Long Path Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy to directly observe monomolecular gaseous-phase water in the atmosphere And that's not to mention that we see a perfect example of this each and every time we go to a weather website... the weather satellites and ground stations can differentiate between monomolecular gaseous-phase water (humidity) in the atmosphere, and liquid-phase water (clouds) in the atmosphere, Jim, because each absorbs and emits at a different wavelength, just as that video *you* *provided* featuring Anders Nilsson's work on x-ray spectroscopy of water in its three phases shows. Remember? =============================================== https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156 They used x-ray spectroscopy to determine photon energy from electron orbital shell descent. You'll note the gaseous phase water molecule's photon spectra peaks at a much lower photon energy than ice. This is due to differences in hydrogen bonding strength between the two phases. https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2304 You'll note the double peak of liquid water. Professor Anders Nilsson, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory: "Two peaks, what does that mean? Could it be two different types of water molecules then, in the liquid? And if you look at it, one of the peaks is very close to the gas phase and the other peak is closer to the ice. So it looks like water contains two types of molecules." =============================================== That was a reference *you* *provided*, Jim, and it proves you *wrong*... that you didn't and don't realize that fact is testament that you lack the requisite educational background to even be attempting to form a model of the atmosphere... hence the reason your "theory" is so wrong in so many ways. And as I explained to you, the dual peak of liquid water, one near the gaseous-phase monomolecular water peak (remember, you've claimed that all water must be liquid in the atmosphere, thus if a different spectral peak is observed from liquid water, it *must* be gaseous phase monomolecular water, not liquid water, which would have the same spectral peaks as bulk liquid water), and one near the solid-phase water peaks are due to the two spin isomers of water. There are two water molecule hybrids. This also happens to utterly destroy your contention that water molecule polarity changes upon H bonding (which would mean that water solvent properties randomly change... and we know that's not the case, James). The water molecule polarity isn't changing upon H bonding, thereby lending a variable strength H bond, there are two spin isomers of water with two different H bond strengths. This is well-established and rigorously-studied science, James, corroborated by study upon study upon study. > It's just a dumb thing that people believe. No, your "theory" is a dumb thing that only one dumb person believes, Jim. Why can't you get your kooky "theory" through the peer-review process, Jim? Why are there *no* corroborating studies to your moronic "theory", James? Why have you been proven wrong on every single one of your moronic claims, Jim? > Kind of like the greenhouse effect. The greenhouse effect has much more believability to it than your wholly fabricated "theory", Jim. Your kooky claims are unsupported by reality, research or reason. They're the mad ranting of a deluded halfwit. >> Jim. Your saying so doesn't make it so. > The fact that you resort to consensus to make your argument > advertises the fact that empirically your argument is invalid. "consensus" LOL Facts remain facts regardless of consensus, Jim... and whereas I have facts *and* consensus on my side, you have neither. > The fact that your only argument involve referencing people > that made the same dumbass assumptions that you made is all > the evidence necessary to substantiate that this is a group delusion. And your argument revolves around denying all of science without proof so you can claim you're smarter than all those hundreds of thousands of scientists over the past 250+ years doing careful scientific work. Except you have no proof, no evidence, no mathematical model, no physical model, nothing but your suppositions pulled straight from your ass. You've built supposition upon supposition while dismissing all evidence that you're a deluded moronic kook... and look at you now, Jim... you're claiming a sentient "plasmic sky tornado" which can reach down it's noodly appendages and wreak havoc in the form of tornados upon the populace on a whim, which somehow disguises itself as a band of flat, smooth fast jet stream air and somehow hides its noodly appendages until the last moment before it strikes. In other words, Jim, you're psychotic. >> Meanwhile, there are several satellites operated by several agencies >> watching latent heat of condensation release from clouds, Jim. Why do >> you continue to deny reality? > LOL. So, publicly funded agencies are confirming the existence > of something the public generally believes. Gee golly. I can't > imagine how that can happen. Your paranoid schizophrenia is showing, Jim. > If a public agency confirmed the existence of angels would you > believe that? Ghosts? Bigfoot? Space aliens. If they had corroborable evidence? Now, where's your evidence of your sentient "plasmic sky tornado" with invisible noodly appendages stretching hundreds upon hundreds of miles through the sky to create tornadoes, Jim? You believe in something with no evidence, Jim... you're psychotic. Take your meds, Jim. > Has it occurred to you that if you had a valid argument you > would have no need to refer to consensus? Then it's a good thing I've not referred to consensus, Jim. Rather, I've been drop-kicking your moronic psychotic ass across Usenet using scientific proof. Why don't you have any evidence, let alone any proof, for your sentient "plasmic sky tornado" with invisible noodly appendages stretching hundreds upon hundreds of miles through the sky to create tornadoes, Jim? Why can't you get your kooky "theory" through the peer review process, Jim? Why is there no corroborating research to your kooky "theory", Jim? Why haven't you taken your meds, Jim? <snicker> Now, before you run away, you'll be getting right on addressing those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions in your kooky "theory", Jim... those flaws are fatal. Your "theory" is dead, Jim. ============================================================ You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Jim? -- Kadaitcha Man (aka HalfADickRick Mather) is an AUK veteran from way back. He was actually stupid enough to try to hook up with that AUK pass-around girl Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries (aka Rhonda Russo), but ended up booting her to the curb because she's just a cunt hair away from being that nucking futs cat lady dragging a folding cart filled with recyclables so she can afford to buy cat food for herself and her dozen cats. He dodged a bullet, given that she now looks like a reject from a zombie slasher flick, has cancer, hypothyroidism, bulging neck goiters, rotting gums, missing teeth, thinning hair, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Autism and is just plumb nutz. HalfADickRick lost his better half in a motorcycle accident, so even if he had hooked up with Rhondumb, he'd have to get a surrogate to bed her. He's got growling menacingly down to a science, but toothless old dogs have had plenty of time to practice. He has first-hand experience with gaiety, given that his oldest son wasn't raised right and turned out to be light in the loafers... which limits HalfADickRick's trolling abilities and precludes him laughing at the sissies. So he lost half his dick *and* now has no balls for trolling. "Big things are made out of little things." HalfADickRick Mather's Grand Unified Theory of the Universe. Message-ID: <d7419da693ffc53a544d5e1569ac9bfc@dizum.com> "all matter appeared simultaneously in all places at once (i.e. everywhere at the same time)" Delusional fuckwit HalfADickRick denying nucleosynthesis, nuclear transmutation, universal expansion, hydrogen consisting of most universal mass, cosmic background radiation, 21 cm radiation, the very means by which matter came to be formed from energy after the big bang, and most importantly, reality. Message-ID: <9eb660cc06ece30da6a8e7a947a65dfb@dizum.com> HalfADickRick believes these two statements mean the same thing... he's too stupid to realize the contradiction within the statements: 1) "When you touch something, you don't actually touch it because the negative charge of the electrons in all matter repel each other." 2) "everything you experience is experienced only within your consciousness. That is, there is no reality apart from consciousness." MID: <269e51973939871be9eeaaef420f8a6c@dizum.com> "Who said it's your eyes that see?" HalfADickRick, yet again displaying his unfathomable stupidity. "The Turing test is overrated anyway." HalfADickRick, mad because he's too stupid to pass the Turing test. "The now you experience now simply moves to this now." HalfADickRick's excuse for living in the past. Message-ID: <2e6f960b0b8c4a738b1116b41865cb35@dizum.com> HalfADickRick projects what he thinks of himself: "A fairyboy with an inadequate penis." Message-ID: <d4e79c0adde0074ee812eba8d9023f97@dizum.com> HalfADickRick tried blaming his own screediness on a Visual Basic bot he programmed, k'laming it's artificially intelligent and able to hold contextually-relevant conversations without any assistance... when challenged to put Fred Tehbot to work producing 5000 intelligent and contextually relevant replies per day to random posts, an easy task for a machine, HalfADickRick started backpedaling, evading and hurling insults. In actuality, he was assisting his tardbot by screeding right alongside it to lend it the appearance of intelligence (but only the appearance, because HalfADickRick's pretty retarded LOL). Spanked to tears yet again by reality, he plonked and ran away, tears streaming, fright-piss flowing, a plaintive "WHHHHAAAAAAA!" issuing from his otherwise-dumbstruck mouth. <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 10:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2a989aa0-ba95-4d28-94e7-2141fdfce58b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #563577 |
On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 9:52:25 PM UTC-7, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as Solving > Tornadoes, in > <news:dfc64773-2dea-4efa-bfe9-e5d404d110d7@googlegroups.com> did > thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > > Bwahahahaaa! I've got the kooktard James McGinn bleating all day as a > desperate last-ditch attempt at defending his delusions... how's that > working for you, Jim, you fucking moronic psychotic spankard? > > > On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 8:45:06 PM UTC-7, > > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > >>> Consequently meteorology's notion that storms > >>> are caused by the convective upwelling of gaseous H2O and subsequent > >>> release of "latent heat" is refuted. > > >> No, it's not "refuted", > > > For most people it's unfalsyfiable in that the are intellectually > > incapable of making a distinction between gas and vapor (vapor > > being liquid suspended in air). Either way its pseudoscience. > > Nobody has ever produced evidence of gaseous H2O in our atmosphere. > > You mean this evidence, James? > > Water In The Gas Phase - > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3350649/ > Not ab initio... direct measurement of monomolecular water in the > gaseous phase. 16 referenced papers. > > Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research > http://www.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/molecular_mechanism_of_water_evaporation > Direct empirical observation of monomolecular evaporation. > > http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/6686/ > Active Long Path Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy to > directly observe monomolecular gaseous-phase water in the atmosphere > > And that's not to mention that we see a perfect example of this each > and every time we go to a weather website... Hmm. Well, if your only argument is to refer to other people that made the same assumption you did . . . uh . . . well . . . uh . . . what do you think that indicates? (Think about it before you respond.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 19:23 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <4d92bc09bef2725cd3b5676cffff5a84@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #563657 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James McGinn, in <news:2a989aa0-ba95-4d28-94e7-2141fdfce58b@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 9:52:25 PM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as Solving >> Tornadoes, in >> <news:dfc64773-2dea-4efa-bfe9-e5d404d110d7@googlegroups.com> did >> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >> Bwahahahaaa! I've got the kooktard James McGinn bleating all day as a >> desperate last-ditch attempt at defending his delusions... how's that >> working for you, Jim, you fucking moronic psychotic spankard? >>> On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 8:45:06 PM UTC-7, >>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>> Consequently meteorology's notion that storms >>>>> are caused by the convective upwelling of gaseous H2O and subsequent >>>>> release of "latent heat" is refuted. >>>> No, it's not "refuted", >>> For most people it's unfalsyfiable in that the are intellectually >>> incapable of making a distinction between gas and vapor (vapor >>> being liquid suspended in air). Either way its pseudoscience. >>> Nobody has ever produced evidence of gaseous H2O in our atmosphere. >> You mean this evidence, James? >> >> Water In The Gas Phase - >> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3350649/ >> Not ab initio... direct measurement of monomolecular water in the >> gaseous phase. 16 referenced papers. >> >> Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research >> http://www.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/molecular_mechanism_of_water_evaporation >> Direct empirical observation of monomolecular evaporation. >> >> http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/6686/ >> Active Long Path Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy to >> directly observe monomolecular gaseous-phase water in the atmosphere >> >> And that's not to mention that we see a perfect example of this each >> and every time we go to a weather website... the weather satellites >> and ground stations can differentiate between monomolecular >> gaseous-phase water (humidity) in the atmosphere, and liquid-phase >> water (clouds) in the atmosphere, Jim, because each absorbs and emits >> at a different wavelength, just as that video *you* *provided* >> featuring Anders Nilsson's work on x-ray spectroscopy of water in its >> three phases shows. >> >> Remember? >> =============================================== >> https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156 >> They used x-ray spectroscopy to determine photon energy from electron >> orbital shell descent. You'll note the gaseous phase water molecule's >> photon spectra peaks at a much lower photon energy than ice. This is >> due to differences in hydrogen bonding strength between the two >> phases. >> >> https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2304 >> You'll note the double peak of liquid water. >> >> Professor Anders Nilsson, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory: >> "Two peaks, what does that mean? Could it be two different types of >> water molecules then, in the liquid? And if you look at it, one of the >> peaks is very close to the gas phase and the other peak is closer to >> the ice. So it looks like water contains two types of molecules." >> =============================================== >> >> That was a reference *you* *provided*, Jim, and it proves you >> *wrong*... that you didn't and don't realize that fact is testament >> that you lack the requisite educational background to even be >> attempting to form a model of the atmosphere... hence the reason your >> "theory" is so wrong in so many ways. >> >> And as I explained to you, the dual peak of liquid water, one near the >> gaseous-phase monomolecular water peak (remember, you've claimed that >> all water must be liquid in the atmosphere, thus if a different >> spectral peak is observed from liquid water, it *must* be gaseous >> phase monomolecular water, not liquid water, which would have the same >> spectral peaks as bulk liquid water), and one near the solid-phase >> water peaks are due to the two spin isomers of water. There are two >> water molecule hybrids. >> >> This also happens to utterly destroy your contention that water >> molecule polarity changes upon H bonding (which would mean that water >> solvent properties randomly change... and we know that's not the case, >> James). The water molecule polarity isn't changing upon H bonding, >> thereby lending a variable strength H bond, there are two spin isomers >> of water with two different H bond strengths. This is well-established >> and rigorously-studied science, James, corroborated by study upon >> study upon study. >>> It's just a dumb thing that people believe. >> No, your "theory" is a dumb thing that only one dumb person believes, >> Jim. >> >> Why can't you get your kooky "theory" through the peer-review process, >> Jim? >> >> Why are there *no* corroborating studies to your moronic "theory", >> James? >> >> Why have you been proven wrong on every single one of your moronic >> claims, Jim? >>> Kind of like the greenhouse effect. >> The greenhouse effect has much more believability to it than your >> wholly fabricated "theory", Jim. Your kooky claims are unsupported by >> reality, research or reason. They're the mad ranting of a deluded >> halfwit. >>>> Jim. Your saying so doesn't make it so. >>> The fact that you resort to consensus to make your argument >>> advertises the fact that empirically your argument is invalid. >> "consensus" LOL >> >> Facts remain facts regardless of consensus, Jim... and whereas I have >> facts *and* consensus on my side, you have neither. >>> The fact that your only argument involve referencing people >>> that made the same dumbass assumptions that you made is all >>> the evidence necessary to substantiate that this is a group delusion. >> And your argument revolves around denying all of science without proof >> so you can claim you're smarter than all those hundreds of thousands >> of scientists over the past 250+ years doing careful scientific work. >> >> Except you have no proof, no evidence, no mathematical model, no >> physical model, nothing but your suppositions pulled straight from >> your ass. You've built supposition upon supposition while dismissing >> all evidence that you're a deluded moronic kook... and look at you >> now, Jim... you're claiming a sentient "plasmic sky tornado" which can >> reach down it's noodly appendages and wreak havoc in the form of >> tornados upon the populace on a whim, which somehow disguises itself >> as a band of flat, smooth fast jet stream air and somehow hides its >> noodly appendages until the last moment before it strikes. >> >> In other words, Jim, you're psychotic. >>>> Meanwhile, there are several satellites operated by several agencies >>>> watching latent heat of condensation release from clouds, Jim. Why do >>>> you continue to deny reality? >>> LOL. So, publicly funded agencies are confirming the existence >>> of something the public generally believes. Gee golly. I can't >>> imagine how that can happen. >> Your paranoid schizophrenia is showing, Jim. >>> If a public agency confirmed the existence of angels would you >>> believe that? Ghosts? Bigfoot? Space aliens. >> If they had corroborable evidence? Now, where's your evidence of your >> sentient "plasmic sky tornado" with invisible noodly appendages >> stretching hundreds upon hundreds of miles through the sky to create >> tornadoes, Jim? You believe in something with no evidence, Jim... >> you're psychotic. >> >> Take your meds, Jim. >>> Has it occurred to you that if you had a valid argument you >>> would have no need to refer to consensus? >> Then it's a good thing I've not referred to consensus, Jim. Rather, >> I've been drop-kicking your moronic psychotic ass across Usenet using >> scientific proof. >> >> Why don't you have any evidence, let alone any proof, for your >> sentient "plasmic sky tornado" with invisible noodly appendages >> stretching hundreds upon hundreds of miles through the sky to create >> tornadoes, Jim? >> >> Why can't you get your kooky "theory" through the peer review process, >> Jim? >> >> Why is there no corroborating research to your kooky "theory", Jim? >> >> Why haven't you taken your meds, Jim? > Hmm. Well, if your only argument is to refer to other people > that made the same assumption you did . . . uh . . . well . . . > uh . . . what do you think that indicates? (Think about it before > you respond.) It indicates that you're too fucking retarded and delusional to understand that you've just had your kooky fabrication of a "theory" torn to shreds, and now you're making a laughingstock of yourself, James. The H bonding of solid-phase and liquid-phase water affects the photon energy released, the more closely-held are the H bonds, the lesser the photon energy, exactly as Anders Nilsson shows here: https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156 That Anders Nilsson et. al. were measuring a spectral peak that did not coincide with solid-phase water nor with liquid-phase water, a spectral peak with *higher* photon energy than liquid-phase water, means they were measuring gaseous-phase water, Jim. No H bonding, monomolecular. You'll note the gaseous-phase water's photon energy was *higher* because it was monomer water, and thus had no inter-molecular H bonds. If it had had any H bonds, it would have been liquid water, and thus would have had a spectral peak identical to that of liquid water. It could *not* have been liquid water, no matter how small the droplet, James, or the spectral peak would have been identical to that of liquid water. Do you not understand this, James? That fact proves the existence of gaseous water, hence that evaporation is a per-molecule process, hence that latent heat of evaporation exists, hence the central premise of your retarded "theory" is yet again destroyed, Jim. Stop embarrassing yourself, Jim. It's over. You've been exposed as a scientific fraud and a moron far too stupid and delusional to ever model the atmosphere. Now before you run away again, James, do get right on addressing those tough questions you've been running from... they highlight the gaping logic holes in your "theory not-a-theory". Your continuing failure to address them stands as your tacit admission that you know your theory is indefensible. ============================================================ Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Jim? -- Cipher (aka Dave A. Howard the Coward) is an ancient mainframe Usenet bot that never got shut off. He walkered his way back into AUK after an eternity spent in an infinite loop, started clacking his dentures and bragging about what a big man he *used* to be and how we kids should get the hell off his lawn, promptly outed himself, slipped in the urine dribbling down his leg from his over-full Depends, his walker went flying, his dentures clattered to the floor, and he lay there, hearing aid squealing, stabbing an arthritic finger at his Life-Alert pendant and crying "Help, I've soiled myself and I can't get up!" as we youngsters laughed raucously at him. Don't ask him about the Port-A-Potty that drove him so bonkers that he ended up in a tight-white jacket in a rubber room in a mental institution... that wasn't Dave, man. He's blocked all that out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 12:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8468287e-f879-418c-9f1a-3ad0a2652388@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #563682 |
On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 11:33:43 AM UTC-7, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > James McGinn, in > <news:2a989aa0-ba95-4d28-94e7-2141fdfce58b@googlegroups.com> did > thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > > > On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 9:52:25 PM UTC-7, > > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > >> James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as Solving > >> Tornadoes, in > >> <news:dfc64773-2dea-4efa-bfe9-e5d404d110d7@googlegroups.com> did > >> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > > >> Bwahahahaaa! I've got the kooktard James McGinn bleating all day as a > >> desperate last-ditch attempt at defending his delusions... how's that > >> working for you, Jim, you fucking moronic psychotic spankard? > > >>> On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 8:45:06 PM UTC-7, > >>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > >>>>> Consequently meteorology's notion that storms > >>>>> are caused by the convective upwelling of gaseous H2O and subsequent > >>>>> release of "latent heat" is refuted. > > >>>> No, it's not "refuted", > > >>> For most people it's unfalsyfiable in that the are intellectually > >>> incapable of making a distinction between gas and vapor (vapor > >>> being liquid suspended in air). Either way its pseudoscience. > >>> Nobody has ever produced evidence of gaseous H2O in our atmosphere. > > >> You mean this evidence, James? > >> > >> Water In The Gas Phase - > >> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3350649/ > >> Not ab initio... direct measurement of monomolecular water in the > >> gaseous phase. 16 referenced papers. > >> > >> Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research > >> http://www.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/molecular_mechanism_of_water_evaporation > >> Direct empirical observation of monomolecular evaporation. > >> > >> http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/6686/ > >> Active Long Path Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy to > >> directly observe monomolecular gaseous-phase water in the atmosphere > >> > >> And that's not to mention that we see a perfect example of this each > >> and every time we go to a weather website... the weather satellites > >> and ground stations can differentiate between monomolecular > >> gaseous-phase water (humidity) in the atmosphere, and liquid-phase > >> water (clouds) in the atmosphere, Jim, because each absorbs and emits > >> at a different wavelength, just as that video *you* *provided* > >> featuring Anders Nilsson's work on x-ray spectroscopy of water in its > >> three phases shows. > >> > >> Remember? > >> =============================================== > >> https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156 > >> They used x-ray spectroscopy to determine photon energy from electron > >> orbital shell descent. You'll note the gaseous phase water molecule's > >> photon spectra peaks at a much lower photon energy than ice. This is > >> due to differences in hydrogen bonding strength between the two > >> phases. > >> > >> https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2304 > >> You'll note the double peak of liquid water. > >> > >> Professor Anders Nilsson, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory: > >> "Two peaks, what does that mean? Could it be two different types of > >> water molecules then, in the liquid? And if you look at it, one of the > >> peaks is very close to the gas phase and the other peak is closer to > >> the ice. So it looks like water contains two types of molecules." > >> =============================================== > >> > >> That was a reference *you* *provided*, Jim, and it proves you > >> *wrong*... that you didn't and don't realize that fact is testament > >> that you lack the requisite educational background to even be > >> attempting to form a model of the atmosphere... hence the reason your > >> "theory" is so wrong in so many ways. > >> > >> And as I explained to you, the dual peak of liquid water, one near the > >> gaseous-phase monomolecular water peak (remember, you've claimed that > >> all water must be liquid in the atmosphere, thus if a different > >> spectral peak is observed from liquid water, it *must* be gaseous > >> phase monomolecular water, not liquid water, which would have the same > >> spectral peaks as bulk liquid water), and one near the solid-phase > >> water peaks are due to the two spin isomers of water. There are two > >> water molecule hybrids. > >> > >> This also happens to utterly destroy your contention that water > >> molecule polarity changes upon H bonding (which would mean that water > >> solvent properties randomly change... and we know that's not the case, > >> James). The water molecule polarity isn't changing upon H bonding, > >> thereby lending a variable strength H bond, there are two spin isomers > >> of water with two different H bond strengths. This is well-established > >> and rigorously-studied science, James, corroborated by study upon > >> study upon study. > > >>> It's just a dumb thing that people believe. > > >> No, your "theory" is a dumb thing that only one dumb person believes, > >> Jim. > >> > >> Why can't you get your kooky "theory" through the peer-review process, > >> Jim? > >> > >> Why are there *no* corroborating studies to your moronic "theory", > >> James? > >> > >> Why have you been proven wrong on every single one of your moronic > >> claims, Jim? > > >>> Kind of like the greenhouse effect. > > >> The greenhouse effect has much more believability to it than your > >> wholly fabricated "theory", Jim. Your kooky claims are unsupported by > >> reality, research or reason. They're the mad ranting of a deluded > >> halfwit. > > >>>> Jim. Your saying so doesn't make it so. > > >>> The fact that you resort to consensus to make your argument > >>> advertises the fact that empirically your argument is invalid. > > >> "consensus" LOL > >> > >> Facts remain facts regardless of consensus, Jim... and whereas I have > >> facts *and* consensus on my side, you have neither. > > >>> The fact that your only argument involve referencing people > >>> that made the same dumbass assumptions that you made is all > >>> the evidence necessary to substantiate that this is a group delusion. > > >> And your argument revolves around denying all of science without proof > >> so you can claim you're smarter than all those hundreds of thousands > >> of scientists over the past 250+ years doing careful scientific work. > >> > >> Except you have no proof, no evidence, no mathematical model, no > >> physical model, nothing but your suppositions pulled straight from > >> your ass. You've built supposition upon supposition while dismissing > >> all evidence that you're a deluded moronic kook... and look at you > >> now, Jim... you're claiming a sentient "plasmic sky tornado" which can > >> reach down it's noodly appendages and wreak havoc in the form of > >> tornados upon the populace on a whim, which somehow disguises itself > >> as a band of flat, smooth fast jet stream air and somehow hides its > >> noodly appendages until the last moment before it strikes. > >> > >> In other words, Jim, you're psychotic. > > >>>> Meanwhile, there are several satellites operated by several agencies > >>>> watching latent heat of condensation release from clouds, Jim. Why do > >>>> you continue to deny reality? > > >>> LOL. So, publicly funded agencies are confirming the existence > >>> of something the public generally believes. Gee golly. I can't > >>> imagine how that can happen. > > >> Your paranoid schizophrenia is showing, Jim. > > >>> If a public agency confirmed the existence of angels would you > >>> believe that? Ghosts? Bigfoot? Space aliens. > > >> If they had corroborable evidence? Now, where's your evidence of your > >> sentient "plasmic sky tornado" with invisible noodly appendages > >> stretching hundreds upon hundreds of miles through the sky to create > >> tornadoes, Jim? You believe in something with no evidence, Jim... > >> you're psychotic. > >> > >> Take your meds, Jim. > > >>> Has it occurred to you that if you had a valid argument you > >>> would have no need to refer to consensus? > > >> Then it's a good thing I've not referred to consensus, Jim. Rather, > >> I've been drop-kicking your moronic psychotic ass across Usenet using > >> scientific proof. > >> > >> Why don't you have any evidence, let alone any proof, for your > >> sentient "plasmic sky tornado" with invisible noodly appendages > >> stretching hundreds upon hundreds of miles through the sky to create > >> tornadoes, Jim? > >> > >> Why can't you get your kooky "theory" through the peer review process, > >> Jim? > >> > >> Why is there no corroborating research to your kooky "theory", Jim? > >> > >> Why haven't you taken your meds, Jim? > > > Hmm. Well, if your only argument is to refer to other people > > that made the same assumption you did . . . uh . . . well . . . > > uh . . . what do you think that indicates? (Think about it before > > you respond.) > > It indicates that you're too fucking retarded and delusional to > understand that you've just had your kooky fabrication of a "theory" > torn to shreds, and now you're making a laughingstock of yourself, > James. Uh, . . . er . . . uh. Well, uh . . . oki doki.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 21:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <0c70759136baecfdcd41e85990a0955e@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #563693 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James McGinn, in <news:8468287e-f879-418c-9f1a-3ad0a2652388@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 11:33:43 AM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> It indicates that you're too fucking retarded and delusional to >> understand that you've just had your kooky fabrication of a "theory" >> torn to shreds, and now you're making a laughingstock of yourself, >> James. >> >> The H bonding of solid-phase and liquid-phase water affects the photon >> energy released, the more closely-held are the H bonds, the lesser the >> photon energy, exactly as Anders Nilsson shows here: >> https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156 >> >> That Anders Nilsson et. al. were measuring a spectral peak that did >> not coincide with solid-phase water nor with liquid-phase water, a >> spectral peak with *higher* photon energy than liquid-phase water, >> means they were measuring gaseous-phase water, Jim. No H bonding, >> monomolecular. >> >> You'll note the gaseous-phase water's photon energy was *higher* >> because it was monomer water, and thus had no inter-molecular H bonds. >> If it had had any H bonds, it would have been liquid water, and thus >> would have had a spectral peak identical to that of liquid water. >> >> It could *not* have been liquid water, no matter how small the >> droplet, James, or the spectral peak would have been identical to that >> of liquid water. >> >> Do you not understand this, James? That fact proves the existence of >> gaseous water, hence that evaporation is a per-molecule process, hence >> that latent heat of evaporation exists, hence the central premise of >> your retarded "theory" is yet again destroyed, Jim. >> >> Stop embarrassing yourself, Jim. It's over. You've been exposed as a >> scientific fraud and a moron far too stupid and delusional to ever >> model the atmosphere. > Uh, . . . er . . . uh. Well, uh . . . oki doki. No, Jim, not "oki doki". You've been proven *wrong*. Your retarded theory is *dead*. All you're doing now is proving that you're sprinting down the path toward full-blown psychosis as you deny every single scientific principle garnered from carefully controlled scientific experimentation over the past 250+ years, and as you expand your retarded conspiracy theory to include every field of science. In fact, you're *so* far gone you're going to sue *science*, James. You've stated you're going to waltz into court with your kooky "class action" kooksoot written in crayon, and *sue* *science*. And I have no doubt that when that kooksoot is laughed out of court, and after you're released from your 72 hour psychiatric hold, you'll get right to work on that "class action" kooksoot to sue *reality*. LOL You're a moronic idiotic insane uneducated halfwit, a scientific fraud and a laughingstock, James. That's reality. Deal with it. Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Jim? -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer; that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place", that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 15:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <15a684a8-9387-4afd-935c-33d6cdf09df6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #563712 |
On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 1:30:32 PM UTC-7, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > >> Stop embarrassing yourself, Jim. It's over. You've been exposed as a > >> scientific fraud and a moron far too stupid and delusional to ever > >> model the atmosphere. > > > Uh, . . . er . . . uh. Well, uh . . . oki doki. > > No, Jim, not "oki doki". You've been proven *wrong*. Maybe you should write a book on it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 07:14 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <8eef00f2b2bd1916f4d8eae5f68d9a3a@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #563725 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch CA, in <news:15a684a8-9387-4afd-935c-33d6cdf09df6@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 1:30:32 PM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>> It indicates that you're too fucking retarded and delusional to >>>> understand that you've just had your kooky fabrication of a "theory" >>>> torn to shreds, and now you're making a laughingstock of yourself, >>>> James. >>>> >>>> The H bonding of solid-phase and liquid-phase water affects the photon >>>> energy released, the more closely-held are the H bonds, the lesser the >>>> photon energy, exactly as Anders Nilsson shows here: >>>> https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156 >>>> >>>> That Anders Nilsson et. al. were measuring a spectral peak that did >>>> not coincide with solid-phase water nor with liquid-phase water, a >>>> spectral peak with *higher* photon energy than liquid-phase water, >>>> means they were measuring gaseous-phase water, Jim. No H bonding, >>>> monomolecular. >>>> >>>> You'll note the gaseous-phase water's photon energy was *higher* >>>> because it was monomer water, and thus had no inter-molecular H bonds. >>>> If it had had any H bonds, it would have been liquid water, and thus >>>> would have had a spectral peak identical to that of liquid water. >>>> >>>> It could *not* have been liquid water, no matter how small the >>>> droplet, James, or the spectral peak would have been identical to that >>>> of liquid water. >>>> >>>> Do you not understand this, James? That fact proves the existence of >>>> gaseous water, hence that evaporation is a per-molecule process, hence >>>> that latent heat of evaporation exists, hence the central premise of >>>> your retarded "theory" is yet again destroyed, Jim. >>>> >>>> Stop embarrassing yourself, Jim. It's over. You've been exposed as a >>>> scientific fraud and a moron far too stupid and delusional to ever >>>> model the atmosphere. >>> Uh, . . . er . . . uh. Well, uh . . . oki doki. >> No, Jim, not "oki doki". You've been proven *wrong*. Your retarded >> theory is *dead*. >> >> All you're doing now is proving that you're sprinting down the path >> toward full-blown psychosis as you deny every single scientific >> principle garnered from carefully controlled scientific >> experimentation over the past 250+ years, and as you expand your >> retarded conspiracy theory to include every field of science. >> >> In fact, you're *so* far gone you're going to sue *science*, James. >> You've stated you're going to waltz into court with your kooky "class >> action" kooksoot written in crayon, and *sue* *science*. >> >> And I have no doubt that when that kooksoot is laughed out of court, >> and after you're released from your 72 hour psychiatric hold, you'll >> get right to work on that "class action" kooksoot to sue *reality*. >> LOL >> >> You're a moronic idiotic insane uneducated halfwit, a scientific fraud >> and a laughingstock, James. >> >> That's reality. Deal with it. > Maybe you should write a book on it. You've already written two books detailing your insanity, James... two entire books filled with your uneducated halfwitted denial of reality, with absolutely no experimental data to back your drool up. And what is the result? People laugh at you all the harder. The reviews of your "books" show that people consider you a pathetic moron, a joke. And that pisses you off, doesn't it, James? It pisses you off *so* much that you're going to break out your crayon box, scribble yourself up an illegible "class action" kooksoot, and you're going to sue *science*. LOL And when you're escorted from the courtroom, yelling "It's a conspiracy! All of it! All of science! Don't you see?!", to be carted away for a psychological examination and forced 72 hour psychiatric hold, I'm sure you'll yet again break out your crayons and angrily scribble up a "class action" kooksoot to sue *reality*. LOL That'll show 'em, James. That'll show 'em all. You sad pathetic loser, just quit while you're behind. You're far too stupid, uneducated and insane to even comprehend reality, let alone model it. You've proven yourself a scientific fraud, James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA. And you've made yourself a laughingstock... the whole world points and laughs at you. That's reality, James. Deal with it. Now, do get right on proving the above by running away from all the logical inconsistencies and contradictions in your moronic "theory", outlined in my .sig, James. -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 23:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <741b4eb8-9862-490d-ad16-e1150e8d131b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #563817 |
On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 11:24:50 PM UTC-7, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > >> You're a moronic idiotic insane uneducated halfwit, a scientific fraud > >> and a laughingstock, James. > >> > >> That's reality. Deal with it. > > > Maybe you should write a book on it. > > You've already written two books Right. I didn't just sit around calling people names and dropping links to irrelevant websites. You appear desperate, scattered, and frustrated. Get a grip and make a substantive argument.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 19:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <9aea46fc1669dfb78c954cd4960562da@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #563820 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James McGinn, in <news:741b4eb8-9862-490d-ad16-e1150e8d131b@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 11:24:50 PM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>> You're a moronic idiotic insane uneducated halfwit, a >>>> scientific fraud and a laughingstock, James. >>>> >>>> That's reality. Deal with it. >>> Maybe you should write a book on it. >> You've already written two books > Right. I didn't just sit around calling people names and dropping > links to irrelevant websites. "irrelevant website" LOL Those are links to scientific studies which prove you *wrong*, Jim. For which you have no rebuttal. You've run away from all of them. As for your books... they're as big a laughingstock as you... not one good review. People have called you deluded in the reviews, James. > You appear desperate, scattered, and frustrated. No, you're projecting, James. I'm winning. > Get a grip and make a substantive argument. Already made here: Message-ID: <910a3b6c3baf6ecfefb6505162b5393c@dizum.com> Message-ID: <59de46e56833e802ffb541f95bec654e@dizum.com> Message-ID: <a5e82b3faebefc6443a18618bb478ab7@dizum.com> Message-ID: <d0bfce9ab9680a4276be73c19082817a@dizum.com> Message-ID: <f14b3ddf043a85ecc8327769a777e451@dizum.com> Message-ID: <d9d827db4a7df03d332042e899a77030@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9f938a8128279124eb54c8c7295e9c0f@dizum.com> Message-ID: <f593297b90dc04fb5f0fb1c87b155409@dizum.com> Message-ID: <477037b2caf278107a73eb31288c84db@dizum.com> Message-ID: <a4a5a2f7ab5c2b3256814dd4c6d9ca69@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9a0a5a9f6cad79ce5d7b924abdc6cfc8@dizum.com> Message-ID: <dfe6fb5ba7845ecab8c7f514f3b584af@dizum.com> Message-ID: <f603d966cebf083cfc716a972d18a29a@dizum.com> Message-ID: <af052b6ad0769198f25c57bc3f806f78@dizum.com> Message-ID: <62d2b79d8f5d72ee342d534f05a90965@dizum.com> Message-ID: <dd1ca99246e6a02b1688d1508a4f8015@dizum.com> Message-ID: <7de0ed42906c3cf402fe546f7d591ca7@dizum.com> Message-ID: <b4fff105ac24a694f4ff7a2f4f52cc8f@dizum.com> Message-ID: <16ac6ab66395bebfc4da6f35c6cc9c5c@dizum.com> Message-ID: <4819aa6ca3ee8aa204420c9e791e7219@dizum.com> Message-ID: <3743010fad8da9fce6795e8f9149017e@dizum.com> Message-ID: <5169ac69436fde2a64246e5a70bf3d0f@dizum.com> Message-ID: <e7b68e96c932b645ca76f71c9bcdab4c@dizum.com> Message-ID: <fb786885b86868851dcbb80bbf53a449@dizum.com> Message-ID: <fa98f6fe3da9b5c36d230a3798fcbc89@dizum.com> Message-ID: <fee8520b82337d0fc1d600e5c4044d75@dizum.com> Message-ID: <3e85a67d19ce3b2b7416e2e70ce24b2a@dizum.com> Message-ID: <dbb6a010a96f7fc25e89afef3259fc0e@dizum.com> Message-ID: <a9037d42850bc365089581da6a905132@dizum.com> Message-ID: <3957213f26b82a90a25d8a7105c52bd9@dizum.com> Message-ID: <adcb794730162cb65afc00aeb31ca18a@dizum.com> Message-ID: <1a7a69c9429dc23b34ab195a39e309f1@dizum.com> Message-ID: <497a7ccbf78b578659dbf1c254345f41@dizum.com> Message-ID: <d9bc3e40ade4d1d60cbb378b7290a8f9@dizum.com> Message-ID: <1c360973da7dc57b55ff708e175edbeb@dizum.com> Message-ID: <fa160c3126a97c6bef7f23f27106e877@dizum.com> Message-ID: <3b5bb9d859e32fe3ed0cfab088d08e86@dizum.com> Message-ID: <da6b6261b23e26489f96a8b8184503b2@dizum.com> Message-ID: <056771765eec75cacb84b83bf93b3079@dizum.com> Message-ID: <34cd8f66003351d202ca08369d22ee08@dizum.com> Message-ID: <93b2558293d80093b20754a0c7a6f10f@dizum.com> Message-ID: <deef586f0db89cc6d8cc5b17af613eee@dizum.com> Message-ID: <323719d8a0ffc7eeeb81d09b5da2b252@dizum.com> Message-ID: <57375f4a05eaba5e0451b8c7bb9aed67@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0631b44482c4ebff7cdaa3fffdc186e5@dizum.com> Message-ID: <edf224cd7e3a9afcb3af6a33a42b01e5@dizum.com> Message-ID: <06d6d6118736c38098ac31f651a0a985@dizum.com> Message-ID: <c49a74db62e18eddf44a4169317e9b72@dizum.com> Message-ID: <cf3ac7272ccdbea6a76a4f94b13d684b@dizum.com> Message-ID: <ef3f50a4c5dceabeb69262166dd5e9f0@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0d6b1332baad53f3e37672c6c4d115ef@dizum.com> Message-ID: <30592b12b1e0534bb072e81f1f9184cc@dizum.com> Message-ID: <f7cdf8b51e79787065a0c82f02e74e55@dizum.com> Message-ID: <3919a6785d3b0da0da5c8f2bef582441@dizum.com> Message-ID: <5f24e91292c55a004c9c07231f9e1e8a@dizum.com> Message-ID: <077052cabddefee706a2f93ac660a3f2@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0e7d19c3e0991f82383b8752b5daac77@dizum.com> Message-ID: <c80c10f4c483bfab0575b342145b736a@dizum.com> Message-ID: <95098d7e1a4fea93cf6686b7dd536719@dizum.com> Message-ID: <a91eb5d26158517293a2fa42bd9d8ee5@dizum.com> Message-ID: <681dddc9f88472de0e13b13dfee41d99@dizum.com> Message-ID: <5e829d302a8914c7c8a93ffe56acd1f8@dizum.com> Message-ID: <2997c31859758123d1ae290c92f337f1@dizum.com> Message-ID: <ed7c3c626b991f8634c578ec146804d5@dizum.com> Message-ID: <d15c9a0d02d7d85182bdbc94fedd4669@dizum.com> Message-ID: <ffa40135c12c11a7a50398d8686161fb@dizum.com> Message-ID: <c8fa07f9f38df6e42020780449c1e2fe@dizum.com> Message-ID: <4a405f985fcf2db45de34bede093e489@dizum.com> Message-ID: <cc7d7cb6cff3ecf998176d1d63eeb801@dizum.com> Message-ID: <931d4178a58446d02d03a4a5a1179679@dizum.com> Message-ID: <01365b15259c2e1e2c0d914a4f7a1a8c@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0b6c275bf47d264b925a4870b560420c@dizum.com> Message-ID: <2d8448f4623e0263f0e44013bc3ceaec@dizum.com> Message-ID: <7a17a6f1c194d67e1729477e7910f316@dizum.com> Message-ID: <1d00f176b1306817e7df59364bed6ca9@dizum.com> Message-ID: <701530e3d8d7b26ac83691cc38b68b21@dizum.com> Message-ID: <2cad18d851130f5197769de6a2e6f8c9@dizum.com> Message-ID: <3a336839b35e41298e0d380e5379b9ec@dizum.com> Message-ID: <1679f84a3cce327eabd968c27528aede@dizum.com> Message-ID: <f33fe48e3d7b4b11054aa7b891abe2d5@dizum.com> Message-ID: <40cf388c9f85ba6b9c63bcb4daa35723@dizum.com> Message-ID: <ea47f024155d017848417c086073e8e3@dizum.com> Message-ID: <248b979ce8b36a21b1cea21844e010d6@dizum.com> Message-ID: <99085d93b23b8ba0c7b6f0d591b4947e@dizum.com> Message-ID: <3b30aba297661cdca1914c24c4960061@dizum.com> Message-ID: <c84fe0f8201b303c9bbcbcbb9b97bd1d@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9c8f8ea59e6f7cb3317265e057f1a8be@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0c12e326533cf4d6f7970bb6039c804f@dizum.com> Message-ID: <cc6eaee77e55c9ed3b28e71ad44c98fc@dizum.com> Message-ID: <4981dfb19df51c25a8726a68e9a32883@dizum.com> Message-ID: <4b85bc71eb91e16bdb082fcaba68636c@dizum.com> Message-ID: <57b6f6e2f58db066aa693cef68d02692@dizum.com> Message-ID: <59a61dc72604e892f0e92414521057c3@dizum.com> Message-ID: <1472efa3ca6bdfccb5285d6f040a6594@dizum.com> Message-ID: <2a3072956dc3a57cae0b7459fc9bf0cf@dizum.com> Message-ID: <baa17e76b06b65fafdd542472b29ee00@dizum.com> Message-ID: <7043e575b199cc379ede0bd6d8432f6e@dizum.com> Message-ID: <bc5458d7ca3b9489680f5a31622d8b76@dizum.com> Message-ID: <3186ef619eae0d822e20101fa894f107@dizum.com> Message-ID: <e556426aa1e54e099993762f44260116@dizum.com> Message-ID: <44f0c39dc5bdb8acbbbf1540ff0fd2b2@dizum.com> Message-ID: <b787cc8b0c75ffffd0d95b86e4cd8e56@dizum.com> Message-ID: <ef373fad842eb1d3b972219b805e3cf1@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0c867f8f22c40d291e3dcee1498f5443@dizum.com> Message-ID: <5ed901c761ca842e2693082258f9fd8d@dizum.com> Message-ID: <4ef3443d7f490d5e240cd03c9f6a0f68@dizum.com> Message-ID: <fbfc22381db129441a77eac6a3789b45@dizum.com> Message-ID: <97f2b779e21b2e1884e74d45a35fbe86@dizum.com> Message-ID: <1a082b5b2a283e2f08bc25b1d7f781ed@dizum.com> Message-ID: <f87db38813e6155b04bb5186efcaf3c2@dizum.com> Message-ID: <bd5a4f37294daee9813c4e35d9ca3b5a@dizum.com> Message-ID: <e8096307838a0b979f0fbc8e201fb9e6@dizum.com> Message-ID: <6ee8ec64a49327c39896e28cc2adbe6c@dizum.com> Message-ID: <84d76f192da7b92e045ade7a36650d81@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9d476b2b8116b673d10a56a9bb5d8646@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9f64bbd2e3ccf7fc01ee2538a2fd4139@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9274573975c53cd004cf5294a0c32472@dizum.com> Message-ID: <c5c71181223dcdf5f38737e87f64f47f@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0cdc2ac7127f58566dcf4c7b8f305455@dizum.com> Message-ID: <7a3ede290a69c06a373b66f2e0ba752a@dizum.com> Message-ID: <5a23b6d6f34ca0c0e6d555124fc509aa@dizum.com> Message-ID: <daa8f83137c745a5487a1e83a1e67bad@dizum.com> Message-ID: <d3fab06574213d6ad3cecc273baf804c@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0bc0c234d82e81bd3a218195d3d35a11@dizum.com> Message-ID: <e3139fec3310c45dccb6510c6861590b@dizum.com> Message-ID: <c643767cfb31bc2d98807adcbbb5a6ff@dizum.com> Message-ID: <2aa66d77ccf2f2dc27335490d3174051@dizum.com> Message-ID: <5cc9967543ee80076ee6df13c17444c7@dizum.com> Message-ID: <df5d7b58da0e1690b5d0cfeb065eb908@dizum.com> Message-ID: <d7aef4eae4f59a5ad2a2bcec739831c3@dizum.com> Message-ID: <46310bbd4c9b2bb4a4aae286d2595dcc@dizum.com> Message-ID: <273c4a99282afcda2fa61e091f31b025@dizum.com> Message-ID: <2ddffb0afbf7aa9672c9e88f7665b918@dizum.com> Message-ID: <da3bad6f752a1ecd15ce394ff0da878c@dizum.com> Message-ID: <e88302c1732ca7bb49c4d6aa3f4bf3c5@dizum.com> Message-ID: <50b6e7a18286f7ce8c5be71714773b92@dizum.com> Message-ID: <3d322700957508c73c9ca40ef8209880@dizum.com> Message-ID: <e62f2bbe91e582a78058bd72747a5170@dizum.com> Message-ID: <7d4ade8dabc0b0ca116417ab56303870@dizum.com> Message-ID: <1af22ef07aaf4b2cf7a7fff78ae0a127@dizum.com> Message-ID: <33b36cedd42f02f0b747f4312064b05f@dizum.com> Message-ID: <22ab07a4a75962440c28e423552c3f32@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9e941c77939a251b4e858c5658f944d2@dizum.com> Message-ID: <d90162fea3fdc8212509cff394770f5f@dizum.com> Message-ID: <120b563234823f2695cb29dd4de8f583@dizum.com> Message-ID: <a0b11080a64386da2a1f0bd2538d05bf@dizum.com> Message-ID: <dc2d2b6a13775f0408d4323f66ae656c@dizum.com> Message-ID: <fc0a279540251112ff266c92b4a6fa82@dizum.com> Message-ID: <4057d040fed54382ec64a0da4530cea6@dizum.com> Message-ID: <b008563c0e190abf176e5872b8ede24e@dizum.com> Message-ID: <bf0d0c2465ae841d6fe6811c6adc7936@dizum.com> Message-ID: <648829b2bedb3ea8d39a4e3ec2724acf@dizum.com> Message-ID: <8255892712bc9b7a055f7390de18fdfd@dizum.com> Message-ID: <597a0c212654f13ac8661a211b0815d0@dizum.com> Message-ID: <6bae9e3d0006bce6025cc5dd0acd4153@dizum.com> Message-ID: <08c0d0cc7849759a8d91f6a02de7d96c@dizum.com> Message-ID: <29d39821ebf137245ea1ea534e60d25e@dizum.com> Message-ID: <7854272526b6ca4355c21e3e0c70a934@dizum.com> Message-ID: <fc67ad1cbfe0e39ce95f66cb1232f1d7@dizum.com> Message-ID: <f56762225249e20a9ffbda9d8317a043@dizum.com> Message-ID: <c7af872ed1fa884ddb1f5e7f92d370c4@dizum.com> Message-ID: <6b58de6eb845aa26b377c109dd625104@dizum.com> Message-ID: <6aa26c2cebf4b9c18cf57481be649ef5@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9a0fecba4a64d3ee9cb01d99a9782fc2@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9934e1f19473bd9594f653a992d2fb0a@dizum.com> Message-ID: <4410de6b0d49a2ab5e592a8ff763bfa7@dizum.com> Message-ID: <f337917195a7a6576070297785c9a4e1@dizum.com> Message-ID: <f671e10c04c35da55d5ea3dde492beac@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0f4ab76c1b9d4ea25f14f6df381f8749@dizum.com> Message-ID: <59fa099608d3f114e3fc70182286b172@dizum.com> Message-ID: <3ad49b835fddde44c9f3f65bf1337c01@dizum.com> Message-ID: <14e42fe1e9d38d7490b24e87300a4f2b@dizum.com> Message-ID: <e3594a57f2bf8a3d184bb1a1b51db5c0@dizum.com> Message-ID: <92c76c50f6d04fb963a57230f65c748a@dizum.com> Message-ID: <b35fc654f75a526133dc318752121b53@dizum.com> Message-ID: <cfcd3e126b4086d5a8dc7eccc8567867@dizum.com> Message-ID: <4d92bc09bef2725cd3b5676cffff5a84@dizum.com> Message-ID: <5bc87a191369777db18bf08f6e09afc9@dizum.com> Message-ID: <97b05666b3de706154c8f230ab91584a@dizum.com> Message-ID: <68ecbc4770da33299ac0eac7d3c59d29@dizum.com> Message-ID: <90caecd87c26ab0ebfb6d3ecd3d40700@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0111abaf853fcc1d31c2aca4e0b8fda0@dizum.com> Message-ID: <1227cc1f58ffc4700ef47d3ffed50338@dizum.com> Message-ID: <740bd5f27aa8a4f49bb33870adf0a0cc@dizum.com> Message-ID: <ae7d03f871ad6ab77ed8dc49216429ca@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0c70759136baecfdcd41e85990a0955e@dizum.com> Message-ID: <2b6484b800103dd8c96b0788e38cfd94@dizum.com> Message-ID: <fdc7fb9c57de87e6ba846b3c522bef82@dizum.com> Message-ID: <c543993d21c2fd24f081f484716ef3c0@dizum.com> Message-ID: <3b2c2d7c3889d5eec82b6be05d77190a@dizum.com> Message-ID: <337ad27d8e86048358de5b626d8eda98@dizum.com> Message-ID: <8eef00f2b2bd1916f4d8eae5f68d9a3a@dizum.com> Message-ID: <7cefb3c2f6ff09c64baaaf451a7b397d@dizum.com> Message-ID: <1c31842926661af6a8b975bd0b183c27@dizum.com> Message-ID: <614f6d7a02313dbc6019e087911b5a08@dizum.com> Message-ID: <a7aec78998f53a147a142db7cee55b12@dizum.com> Message-ID: <7234755e51b77217d2743fc660ef8e5d@dizum.com> Each of those posts destroys portions, sometimes huge swaths of your moronic "theory", James. You've mounted not even a whit of defense, instead choosing to run away, blather out more stupidity, expand your conspiracy theory to now include the Standard Model, electrons and photons, convection, molar volume and molar mass, density and pretty much every bit of scientific knowledge over the past 250+ years. You've slapped more patches on your moronic "theory" and in so doing exposed even more logical contradictions, to now include a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys the central premise of your "theory". You've run away from and refused to perform the experiment which would definitively null your "theory", thereby shirking your responsibility to fulfill the onus of proving your kooktard claims. You've not made one substantive argument in favor of your theory, every time you attempt to defend it you expose it and yourself as more of a scientific fraud, and you've become a pathetic laughingstock. In other words, the world must be a thoroughly confusing place to you, James. I'd suggest you educate yourself, but we both know you've tried and failed at that in the past, only deepening your psychosis from having tried. As proof that what I write above is 100% truth, you will yet again run away from substantively addressing those tough questions in my .sig, which highlight the gaping logical contradictions in your moronic "theory". -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 14:47 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <213ueb1kb81j5g55u6ggqknighrtcal125@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #563884 |
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:27:46 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >No, you're projecting, James. I'm winning. Winning what Faketard? make this good now so we don't laff at joo again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 13:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3158ae60e4de872c98cb83@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #563941 |
In article <213ueb1kb81j5g55u6ggqknighrtcal125@4ax.com>, skeet@invalid.invalid says... > > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:27:46 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote > Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > >No, you're projecting, James. I'm winning. > > > Winning what Faketard? make this good now so we don't laff at joo > again. People who are really "winning," don't have to proclaim they're winning, for fuck's sake. -- Mustaffa Sheboygan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 21:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1mkfhk7.15iw4dgmkdjvnN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #563952 |
Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > In article <213ueb1kb81j5g55u6ggqknighrtcal125@4ax.com>, > skeet@invalid.invalid says... > > > > > > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:27:46 +0100 (CET), > > Fake Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus > > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> (Snickerturd) wrote: > > > > >No, you're projecting, James. I'm winning. > > > > > > Winning what Faketard? make this good now so we don't laff at joo > > again. > > People who are really "winning," don't have to proclaim they're winning, > for fuck's sake. > But, *BUT,* We're *WINNING* for fuck's sake !!!1! -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> My pet rock Gordon wants home rule for England.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 05:37 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <8b12bc873b292e1eece968f72b1376dd@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #563941 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Trailer Trash Tony the Law-Breaking Scam-Running Drug-Dealing Wife-Beating Child-Endangering Tax-Evading Unemployable Racist High-School-Dropout Needle-Tracked Drug-Addled Alcoholic Pissbum (aka Tony Ray Rawlings, aka Anton Ray Eaks of 600 Raintree Blvd #58, Lamplighter Trailer Park, Canon City, CO), socked up as Skeeter, in <news:213ueb1kb81j5g55u6ggqknighrtcal125@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:27:46 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> No, you're projecting, James. I'm winning. > Winning what Faketard? make this good now so we don't laff at joo > again. Awww, look at the Pissbum... he doesn't even know what winning is. LOL > <http://imgur.com/xt9bcTq> > > I were a execyootive reegunal sailes man making deleverys. > Now I are a toofless unemployalbe pissbum. <snicker> > I just found out today. Maybe a year. I love you all. > My shits fucked up anyboby givs a damn? No. Lying Drug-Abusing Woman-Beating Pissbum Trailer Trash Tony Ray Eaks. <snicker> -- Proof that Lamey (aka Skeeter) is Anton Ray Eaks: Message-ID: <kus7dj$bh0$1@news.mixmin.net> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topicsearchin/alt.usenet.kooks/messageid$3Akus7dj$24bh0$241@news.mixmin.net/alt.usenet.kooks/MLAQo_O73UM> Pissbum hard at work to earn his drug-money: <http://i.imgur.com/hr4eMvS.jpg> <--- LOL! Just say no to drugs and alcohol, kids! <http://i.imgur.com/uoZbsGI.jpg> <--- LOL! It's Howdy Doody Time!: <http://i.imgur.com/1myBylb.jpg> <--- LOL! The Pissbum Clan: <http://i.imgur.com/cixImyq.jpg> <--- LOL! MID: <81670ab47076fa4432bc62e70914ee31@dizum.com> Thanks for admitting you live in single-wide trailer #58 at the Lamp Lighter Mobile Home Park on Raintree Boulevard in Canon City, Colorado, Pissbum. LOL <https://web.archive.org/web/20150301045717/http://coloradovoters.info/by_number/0005/59023_anton_ray_eaks.html> <https://web.archive.org/web/20150224004840/http://coloradovoters.info/by_address/81212.html> 600 Raintree Blvd. #58 Canon City, CO 81212 Another single-wide? Of course it is... the Lamp Lighter Mobile Home Park only has single-wide trailers. LOL And you get caught in your "I don't do FaceBook" lie again, not to mention your "I'm not Tony Eaks" lie: A drug-addled loserly pissbum wrote: Message-ID: <c30abe10716ad5092ff377450c199bae@dizum.com> "It's dump day today, woke up to fire trucks across the street, seems the house caught fire. What a view I have now...LOL" <https://www.facebook.com/CanonCityDailyRecord?hc_location=timeline> "Tony Eaks - Right across the street from me, Woke up to flames and lights." <https://web.archive.org/web/20150122055700/http://www.canoncitydailyrecord.com/ci_27053304/early-morning-fire-destroys-home-at-lamp-lighter> And before he was a Canon City, CO single-wide trailer-dwelling unemployable pissbum, he was a Fairplay, CO single-wide trailer-dwelling unemployable pissbum. LOL In Fairplay, CO he mooched his mother to an early death... now he's mooching his ultra-ugly transsexual Howdy Doody wife Beverly Jean Johnson-Eaks, who is forced to work two minimum-wage jobs (cashier at Alco, cashier at Dollar Tree) to support Trailer Trash Tony's drug habit. LOL Message-ID: <96a8a62d10d76cd522bcf86bbaef274d@dizum.com> Message-ID: <91a9d7e35f68d22eef5b72f79ef505c0@dizum.com> Unit 66. Trailer Trash Tony is a single-wide pissbum! Bwahahahaaa! ============================================================ Trailer Trash Tony wrote: > Can you prove this single wide trailer thing? Or is it > just another attempt to try and "act" better than me? LOL Yeah, I can now prove "this single wide trailer thing", Trailer Trash Tony. Which by your own admission makes me better than you. LOL So I was right about everything I wrote about you... which makes you a pissbum, Pissbum. LOL <https://web.archive.org/web/20140724093727/http://coloradovoters.info/0005/59023.html> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Anton Ray Eaks was born in 1953 and he registered to vote, giving his address as 21980 HWY 285 UNIT 66, FAIRPLAY, PARK COUNTY, COLORADO 80440. His telephone number is 1-719-477-3574. His voting status is: Active. He is unaffiliated. RESIDENTIAL_ADDRESS: 21980 HWY 285 UNIT 66 RESIDENTIAL_CITY: FAIRPLAY RESIDENTIAL_STATE: CO RESIDENTIAL_ZIP_CODE: 80440 REGISTRATION_DATE: 07/31/2012 BIRTH_YEAR: 1953 PHONE_NUM: 719-477-3574 MAILING_ADDRESS_1: PO BOX 473 MAILING_CITY: FAIRPLAY MAILING_STATE: CO MAILING_ZIP_CODE: 80440 MAILING_ZIP_PLUS: 0473 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ NOTE: That phone number is the Alcoholics Anonymous hot-line at South Park Christian Chapel: <https://web.archive.org/web/20150131161807/http://www.southparkevents.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=48:on-going-activities-for-the-month-&catid=1:latest-news&Itemid=54> "Alcoholics Anonymouis meeting 7-8pm at So Pk Christian Chapel 719-477-3574" Trailer Trash Tony is *such* a drunkard that when he registered to vote, he put down the AA DrunkieLine as his phone number! LOL A map of the gravel quarry / junkyard / trailer park where Trailer Trash Tony rented his shitty single-wide trailer for only $675 / month (and still couldn't pay the rent, and got evicted! LOL): <https://www.google.com/maps/place/21980+Hwy+285+%2366,+Fairplay,+CO+80440/@39.2157874,-105.9922529,346m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x876ae8155a400885:0xfb9ff5490348163d> Unit 66: This is a 3 bd/2ba single-wide trailer. <https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.318572058245476.1073741834.131803693588981&type=1&_fb_noscript=1> SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm) <snicker> ============================================================ Lamey (aka Skeeter) the alcoholic wife-beating outer-filthing drug-addict: Message-ID: <lfjfe7$b3t$4@news.mixmin.net> Message-ID: <1b7ef90407a4295786c3f1338e80d553@dizum.com> Message-ID: <c39bc1cce43a9e6860b642e72943f3ce@dizum.com> Message-ID: <ae39676e2ac093e5259ccf8210ecbb25@dizum.com> Trailer Trash Tony makes a multi-pronged confession: MID: <k9m2ca5g26l46qb2t9h05ff87skcjiov1o@4ax.com> "Yup, I can take 4 or 5 percs and roof your house. It's called the paradoxical affect." Pissbum groveled. LOL Pissbum lost. LOL! Message-ID: <lchuas$q96$4@news.mixmin.net> Message-ID: <c92bbbbfefed840db0563eb29f2d6498@dizum.com> Cowardly Pissbum gets caught in lie after lie. LOL! Message-ID: <l0rfde$hv8$2@news.mixmin.net> Message-ID: <l0smsq$fcq$2@news.mixmin.net> Lamey (aka Skeeter) the forger, busted and scrambling for cover like a coward: <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/2oWKmfnSPEA/RE_35HZp8qAJ> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/2oWKmfnSPEA/-RZxQp6TAe4J> Message-ID: <db92667a7bac368fab1b8ff5085f8b2e@dizum.com> Pissbum gets kicked so hard he's *still* bouncing around Usenet like a SuperBall: ============================================ Message-ID: <kv42gb$vd8$1@news.mixmin.net> <https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=alt.usenet.kooks/ZyzzhJiku3c/Q0c2J9_Jc5YJ> Message-ID: <kuatrj$b2g$1@news.mixmin.net> <https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=alt.usenet.kooks/N91lSABoN2s/JYDwKwwIZn4J> ============================================ Trailer Trash Tony the Single-Wide Trailer-Dwelling Pissbum is driven so insane by my truthiness that he's forced by his psychiatric professional to take Seroquel, a strong anti-psychotic that its maker (Astra Zeneca) only indicates for use in treating schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: ================================================== Lamey (aka Skeeter) admits he now takes Seroquel "to sleep"... it's a prescription medication for the treatment of mania and depression associated with bipolar disease and schizophrenia. I've driven him mad. LOL Pissbum tries to k'lame his doctor-recommended dosage is only half of the smallest tablet Astra Zeneca produces for Seroquel: MID: <3elg2aduthcn6j92jlledhg6sa4ibnbro1@4ax.com>: "Just like seriquil, I take it for sleep at night, 12.5 mg" I shred Pissbum Tony's lies and prove he's gone batty: MID: <0c4a46b95e1b8983104047001ec4e05f@dizum.com> MID: <11715d7d5e802fb4248513f981621812@dizum.com> MID: <3bb2754531e630d89eb7330623ee6281@dizum.com> MID: <8bc988e4842e4338432ad962f84a89d4@dizum.com> ==================================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 15:23 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <q38veb1fcee0m02uhc55ap2h5v58g8btor@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #564048 |
Fakey wrote: > Trailer Trash Tony the Law-Breaking Scam-Running Drug-Dealing > > > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:27:46 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood > > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > >> No, you're projecting, James. I'm winning. > > > Winning what Faketard? make this good now so we don't laff at joo > > again. > > Awww, look at the Pissbum... he doesn't even know what winning is. LOL Fakey, did you solve for 'd' in dy/dx yet? Are you winning? Yeah... yeah, i think you won First Prize... a cherry-red glow-in-the-dark ass emiting red-body radiation at 700 nm. LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 16:36 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <2bde60398e5d28007294dc97b7bd826a@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #564086 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
<news:q38veb1fcee0m02uhc55ap2h5v58g8btor@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:
> Fakey, did you solve for 'd' in dy/dx yet?
Oh, you mean d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x)?
Bwahahahaa! I've primed your foam pump and now you're all eager to
barf foam for me again... and now you can get drop-kicked across
Usenet all over again. LOL
Now, you've been blathering hard as means of covering up the fact that
you failed to grasp vector summation and constructive/destructive
interference for three months, to include your defending DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation... and all that while you found
yourself utterly unable to produce even *one* graph.
And now that I've primed the pump and I've got you bleating out your
froth at a steady pace, you'll get right on addressing that giant
whomping drop-kick you received for being such a fucking moron...
Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
a coward and ran away from.
If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.
<snicker>
===============================================================
Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
=====================================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
components by using trigonometry. We can *add* the horizontal
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
=====================================================
And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
this topic...
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
is interpreted as a vector sum."
There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.
Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
will hopefully understand...
<http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>
Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green
See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.
Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
equal zero.
Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...
<http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>
Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
Red and the Green lines.
In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
volts.
Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
that point on the X axis.
Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?
But wait! It gets even better!
<http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>
That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.
And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!
Because you're both Mathematical Morons.
SPNAK!
<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.
Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
moronic asses across Usenet.
I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...
SPNAK!
I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
<snicker>
And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
formulas used:
100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)
100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...
SPNAK!
You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!
<snicker>
===============================================================
Your inability to understand, let alone refute, that reality stands as
your tacit admission that you are Usenet's Mathematical Moron.
Run, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, run! Bwahahahaaaa!
SPNAK!
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard?
I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
<snicker>
> Are you winning?
You're not. You're cowardly snipping, running away from that giant
whomping SPNAK!, running away from all the SPNAK!age you took as
outlined in my .sig, and proving yourself a GoogleRaping Mathematical
Moron. LOL
> Yeah... yeah, i think you won First Prize... a cherry-red
> glow-in-the-dark ass emiting red-body radiation at 700 nm.
What the fuck is a "red-body", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? Are you a
moron, or what? LOL
> LOL!
RUN, SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD, RUUUUUUUNNNNNNN!!!
Bwahahahaaa!
--
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com>
MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).
That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.
That superposition is the same as wave interference.
That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.
That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.
That RMS isn't a DC voltage.
That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.
That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.
The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.
That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.
What a positive or negative vector is.
That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.
That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".
That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.
That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.
What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.
That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.
That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.
That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.
That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.
That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".
That water can be plasmized.
That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.
And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================
SPNAK!
<snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 11:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nib0fbt234pljjsb2mavqtf4l5m5539fgm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #564157 |
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:36:38 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > >Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in ><news:q38veb1fcee0m02uhc55ap2h5v58g8btor@4ax.com> did thusly jump head >first into the wood chipper again: > >> Fakey, did you solve for 'd' in dy/dx yet? > >Oh, you mean d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x)? > >Bwahahahaa! I've primed your foam pump and now you're all eager to >barf foam for me again... and now you can get drop-kicked across >Usenet all over again. LOL > >Now, you've been blathering hard as means of covering up the fact that >you failed to grasp vector summation and constructive/destructive >interference for three months, to include your defending DildoRider's >kooky sinewave subtraction equation... and all that while you found >yourself utterly unable to produce even *one* graph. > >And now that I've primed the pump and I've got you bleating out your >froth at a steady pace, you'll get right on addressing that giant >whomping drop-kick you received for being such a fucking moron... > >Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at >refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping >drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like >a coward and ran away from. > >If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he >smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because >you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math. All that foam and you still didnt answer the question.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web