Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #644100 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-08-02 16:00 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-08-19 21:51 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 219 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 16:00 -0700
Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 18:27 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Mushnik <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-02 20:46 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-03 00:14 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-03 00:20 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-08-03 12:55 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 15:18 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-03 23:08 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 02:38 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-04 07:55 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 19:58 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 13:26 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-03 13:37 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 04:44 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-04 18:08 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-04 21:14 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-05 21:02 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 19:46 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-05 21:08 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 05:50 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-07 17:39 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-04 03:44 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium Serg Io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-04 10:17 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 19:34 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-04 21:44 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 20:00 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-04 22:24 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-04 23:08 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 00:53 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-05 01:13 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 04:24 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 04:26 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 11:58 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-05 21:17 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 04:53 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-05 05:17 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 11:57 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 22:55 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-06 08:57 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 19:23 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 08:24 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-08-07 14:14 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 11:25 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-08 22:26 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-05 21:07 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 11:56 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 22:46 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-06 15:57 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 20:17 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-07 08:40 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 08:25 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 16:51 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 02:13 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 19:25 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 11:20 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 04:32 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 07:47 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-08 19:34 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 17:12 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-08 13:15 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 06:39 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 09:20 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 08:03 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 12:03 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 10:39 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 14:43 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 16:24 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 03:17 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 16:27 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 23:52 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-09 17:44 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 17:47 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 01:34 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-09 22:22 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 22:34 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-09 20:52 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-09 20:49 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 01:34 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-09 23:27 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 22:01 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-09 11:55 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 16:31 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-08 19:14 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-08 19:11 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-05 23:37 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 16:46 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 17:01 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 17:36 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 03:03 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 23:12 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 13:19 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 17:03 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 17:09 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 02:36 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 11:41 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 10:35 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 18:13 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 11:40 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 18:45 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 11:57 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-05 23:16 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 16:32 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 03:03 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-06 04:18 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 02:49 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 08:28 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-05 23:04 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-05 19:59 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 18:12 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-05 22:13 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-05 21:39 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-07 17:23 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-08 12:19 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-06 04:32 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-05 21:09 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "Eduardo Fahqtardo" <Dave3@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 18:46 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-04 21:57 +1000
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 06:21 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-04 23:03 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-04 19:15 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-05 14:35 +1000
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 04:28 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-05 22:13 +1000
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-05 06:01 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-05 23:22 +1000
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-05 21:00 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 06:26 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-05 09:02 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-05 21:25 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 12:02 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 23:03 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 13:19 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 08:29 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 17:06 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 07:51 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-06 16:49 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 15:52 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 00:00 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 17:08 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 02:36 +0000
Re: Waves need a medium Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-06 20:21 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 19:47 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-05 21:21 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-05 08:54 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 22:38 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-06 08:13 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 17:00 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-06 20:55 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 23:37 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-07 08:30 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-07 17:44 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 08:31 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 07:29 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-07 10:59 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 13:22 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 13:23 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-07 17:27 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-08 12:39 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-05 21:12 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-04 18:10 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 10:06 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-08-04 13:44 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 10:21 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-05 15:44 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-04 14:31 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-04 18:16 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 10:24 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-05 16:19 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 10:20 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-05 15:43 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 10:14 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-05 15:57 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 19:51 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium zubeneschgenubi@gmail.com - 2017-08-09 17:16 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-09 21:05 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium zubeneschgenubi@gmail.com - 2017-08-09 20:01 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-09 23:38 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 21:52 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 22:15 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-10 02:12 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-10 02:29 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-10 17:29 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 15:45 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-10 19:13 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 16:55 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-10 20:09 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 18:57 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-11 18:04 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-11 21:26 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 13:54 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-16 16:39 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-16 21:25 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 02:27 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 02:49 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 06:20 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 06:58 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 07:19 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 07:27 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 16:12 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-10 22:39 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 20:51 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-11 18:15 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-16 17:56 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 16:50 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-16 21:41 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 19:05 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 19:34 -0500
Re: Waves need a medium Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 15:59 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-10 09:43 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium zubeneschgenubi@gmail.com - 2017-08-09 18:45 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 19:08 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-17 11:27 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-17 12:40 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-17 17:57 -0400
Re: Waves need a medium raymond.yohros@gmail.com - 2017-08-17 13:51 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-17 20:57 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-18 12:08 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-18 14:12 -0700
Re: Waves need a medium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-19 21:51 -0400
Page 1 of 11 [1] 2 3 … 11 Next page →
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-02 16:00 -0700 |
| Subject | Waves need a medium |
| Message-ID | <af70e8ac-f3a4-44b1-9618-37ae3961e1dd@googlegroups.com> |
On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 1:23:52 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 8/1/17 7:17 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > Waves need a medium. > > No, they do not. Waves need only a system where the relevant laws are in > the form of the wave equation, period, end of story. No medium is required. Only if the abstract is real, which suits the frauds but not engineers. > Somewhere in your education, you got the misinformation that waves > require a medium. Where? From water waves requiring water From sound waves requiring air/solid From Mexican waves requiring humans From vibration waves requiring a string Since these waves require a medium, electromagnetic waves need a medium. Because it is the medium which must support and pass on the disturbance. The presence of electromagnetic waves can be physically seen when one does VSWR measurements using a slotted coaxial line, and microwave generator and a VSWR meter. While testing antenna and other microwave equipment from 1977 to 1987 I used the above apparatus. Evidently waves exist and as waves cannot exist without a medium there has to be a medium and that medium we call aether. It is quite another thing to neglect the medium for practical purposes. But to say that a wave exists but there is no medium to propagate it, is preposterous. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-02 18:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f9b34459-17c2-4e7f-8cf0-b1ef7caed9b6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644100 |
Black Holes are vortices in the aether. When atoms, which are constructed from aether, and also somehow have charge, fall into a black hole, they are accelerated around it faster and faster until the magnetism created by the two opposite charges blows them apart, and two jets of high-energy particles leave in opposite directions at right angle to the disk. It will be found that the two opposite jets are oppositely-charged.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mushnik <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-02 20:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oltvad$1f90$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #644100 |
On 8/2/2017 6:00 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 1:23:52 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 8/1/17 7:17 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> Waves need a medium. >> >> No, they do not. Waves need only a system where the relevant laws are in >> the form of the wave equation, period, end of story. No medium is required. > > Only if the abstract is real, which suits the frauds but not engineers. > >> Somewhere in your education, you got the misinformation that waves >> require a medium. Where? > From water waves requiring water > From sound waves requiring air/solid > From Mexican waves requiring humans > From vibration waves requiring a string > > Since these waves require a medium, electromagnetic waves need a medium. > Because it is the medium which must support and pass on the disturbance. > > The presence of electromagnetic waves can be physically seen when one does > VSWR measurements using a slotted coaxial line, and microwave generator and a > VSWR meter. > > While testing antenna and other microwave equipment from 1977 to 1987 I used > the above apparatus. > > Evidently waves exist and as waves cannot exist without a medium there has to > be a medium and that medium we call aether. > > It is quite another thing to neglect the medium for practical purposes. > But to say that a wave exists but there is no medium to propagate it, is > preposterous. that is old old old school back to the 1800's, throw away your cellphone, and your computer, and car,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 00:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c5985a8b-aa03-4666-a1fb-9fb59d47d37b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644100 |
On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:00:44 AM UTC+3, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 1:23:52 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > On 8/1/17 7:17 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > Waves need a medium. > > > > No, they do not. Waves need only a system where the relevant laws are in > > the form of the wave equation, period, end of story. No medium is required. > > Only if the abstract is real, which suits the frauds but not engineers. > > > Somewhere in your education, you got the misinformation that waves > > require a medium. Where? > > From water waves requiring water > From sound waves requiring air/solid > From Mexican waves requiring humans > From vibration waves requiring a string > > Since these waves require a medium, electromagnetic waves need a medium. > Because it is the medium which must support and pass on the disturbance. > > The presence of electromagnetic waves can be physically seen when one does > VSWR measurements using a slotted coaxial line, and microwave generator and a > VSWR meter. > > While testing antenna and other microwave equipment from 1977 to 1987 I used > the above apparatus. > > Evidently waves exist and as waves cannot exist without a medium there has to > be a medium and that medium we call aether. > > It is quite another thing to neglect the medium for practical purposes. > But to say that a wave exists but there is no medium to propagate it, is > preposterous. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee ============================ did you here the rumor that EM waves - has mass ??? ====== Y.Porat ==================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 00:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <33fd627d-1bae-4329-a75f-f84c91110948@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644161 |
On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 10:15:01 AM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:00:44 AM UTC+3, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 1:23:52 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > On 8/1/17 7:17 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > Waves need a medium. > > > > > > No, they do not. Waves need only a system where the relevant laws are in > > > the form of the wave equation, period, end of story. No medium is required. > > > > Only if the abstract is real, which suits the frauds but not engineers. > > > > > Somewhere in your education, you got the misinformation that waves > > > require a medium. Where? > > > > From water waves requiring water > > From sound waves requiring air/solid > > From Mexican waves requiring humans > > From vibration waves requiring a string > > > > Since these waves require a medium, electromagnetic waves need a medium. > > Because it is the medium which must support and pass on the disturbance. > > > > The presence of electromagnetic waves can be physically seen when one does > > VSWR measurements using a slotted coaxial line, and microwave generator and a > > VSWR meter. > > > > While testing antenna and other microwave equipment from 1977 to 1987 I used > > the above apparatus. > > > > Evidently waves exist and as waves cannot exist without a medium there has to > > be a medium and that medium we call aether. > > > > It is quite another thing to neglect the medium for practical purposes. > > But to say that a wave exists but there is no medium to propagate it, is > > preposterous. > > > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > ============================ > did you here the rumor that > EM waves - has mass ??? > ====== > Y.Porat > ================== is there a difference between water and EM waves THAT TAVELL IN ENDLESS SPACE -ALONG THOUSANDS OF LIGHT YEARS ?? ---- Y.Porat ============================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 12:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6d9a641c-8598-463b-a175-477b03e1b5c2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644165 |
On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 12:20:33 AM UTC-7, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 10:15:01 AM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:00:44 AM UTC+3, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 1:23:52 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > > On 8/1/17 7:17 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > > Waves need a medium. > > > > > > > > No, they do not. Waves need only a system where the relevant laws are in > > > > the form of the wave equation, period, end of story. No medium is required. > > > > > > Only if the abstract is real, which suits the frauds but not engineers. > > > > > > > Somewhere in your education, you got the misinformation that waves > > > > require a medium. Where? > > > > > > From water waves requiring water > > > From sound waves requiring air/solid > > > From Mexican waves requiring humans > > > From vibration waves requiring a string > > > > > > Since these waves require a medium, electromagnetic waves need a medium. > > > Because it is the medium which must support and pass on the disturbance. > > > > > > The presence of electromagnetic waves can be physically seen when one does > > > VSWR measurements using a slotted coaxial line, and microwave generator and a > > > VSWR meter. > > > > > > While testing antenna and other microwave equipment from 1977 to 1987 I used > > > the above apparatus. > > > > > > Evidently waves exist and as waves cannot exist without a medium there has to > > > be a medium and that medium we call aether. > > > > > > It is quite another thing to neglect the medium for practical purposes. > > > But to say that a wave exists but there is no medium to propagate it, is > > > preposterous. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Arindam Banerjee > > ============================ > > did you here the rumor that > > EM waves - has mass ??? > > ====== > > Y.Porat > > ================== > is there a difference between water and EM > waves > THAT TAVELL IN ENDLESS SPACE -ALONG THOUSANDS OF LIGHT YEARS ?? > > ---- > Y.Porat > ============================ Only if there is no endless ocean. Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 15:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <80a7926e-098a-4700-a56a-d2de0af0fd4a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644161 |
On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 5:15:01 PM UTC+10, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:00:44 AM UTC+3, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 1:23:52 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > On 8/1/17 7:17 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > Waves need a medium. > > > > > > No, they do not. Waves need only a system where the relevant laws are in > > > the form of the wave equation, period, end of story. No medium is required. > > > > Only if the abstract is real, which suits the frauds but not engineers. > > > > > Somewhere in your education, you got the misinformation that waves > > > require a medium. Where? > > > > From water waves requiring water > > From sound waves requiring air/solid > > From Mexican waves requiring humans > > From vibration waves requiring a string > > > > Since these waves require a medium, electromagnetic waves need a medium. > > Because it is the medium which must support and pass on the disturbance. > > > > The presence of electromagnetic waves can be physically seen when one does > > VSWR measurements using a slotted coaxial line, and microwave generator and a > > VSWR meter. > > > > While testing antenna and other microwave equipment from 1977 to 1987 I used > > the above apparatus. > > > > Evidently waves exist and as waves cannot exist without a medium there has to > > be a medium and that medium we call aether. > > > > It is quite another thing to neglect the medium for practical purposes. > > But to say that a wave exists but there is no medium to propagate it, is > > preposterous. > > > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > ============================ > did you here the rumor that > EM waves - has mass ??? > ====== > Y.Porat > ================== Yes, based upon e=mcc which is a lie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 23:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ecd549dd-0045-4d7f-a7d7-6ad019554357@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644161 |
On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 10:15:01 AM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:00:44 AM UTC+3, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 1:23:52 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > On 8/1/17 7:17 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > Waves need a medium. > > > > > > No, they do not. Waves need only a system where the relevant laws are in > > > the form of the wave equation, period, end of story. No medium is required. > > > > Only if the abstract is real, which suits the frauds but not engineers. > > > > > Somewhere in your education, you got the misinformation that waves > > > require a medium. Where? > > > > From water waves requiring water > > From sound waves requiring air/solid > > From Mexican waves requiring humans > > From vibration waves requiring a string > > > > Since these waves require a medium, electromagnetic waves need a medium. > > Because it is the medium which must support and pass on the disturbance. > > > > The presence of electromagnetic waves can be physically seen when one does > > ============================ > did you here the rumor that > EM waves - has mass ??? > ====== > Y.Porat > ================== Arindam o hope you are not dumb !! I TOLD YOU THAT EM WAVES HAS MASS - THE ONLY MASS I TOLD YOU THAT THE MAXWELL WEQUATIONS HAS MASS IN IT IT IS HIDDEN IN ITS CONSTANTS !! SO IT IS WRONG THAT EM WAVES HAS NO MASS DID YOU GET IT ??!! 2 I TOLD YOU THAT HAD THERE NO ABSOLUTE EMPTY DPACE NO MOTION COULD BE DON 2 EM waves has mass !! if here was not absolute location of empty space no motion could be done is it complicated to understand if so and you go on boggling the balls about dense Aether and loose Aether that has no mass if no mass what is there that is ''more dense and more loos''' don't you realize that what you say is not science ??! it i s Baba Yagga stories !! even the(experimental fact ?? that you brought about slowing velocity of EM waves in an "electric conductor is against you and your Aether because in free space there is no slowing down of Em wave !!!!!!!!!!!!!! in an electric conductor material (mass ) it is the friction(or collisions ) between em wave and matter of conductor that is causing some slowing of EM wave THAT HAD MSSS AS WELL - !! or even lengthening the way of en wave ?? moreover !! WE KNOW THAT EM WAVE (current) IN MATTER IS CAUSING ****LOSS OF ENERY (BY HEAT !!)****** WAS IT massless AETHER IN IT THAT conductor - -NO LOSS OF ENERGY WOULD BECOME !!! etc etc !! iow creation of heat in a electric conductor is caused by mass against(or beside ) mass friction !! complicated ?? yet not babba Yaga 'stories ==================== and you keep boggling the boles and wasting your life and others with massless Aether just do the dimension analysis of MAXWEL EQUATIJS AND YOU WIL FIND the mass of em wave THER !! not in absolute empty space ========================================== NO MASS '' THE ONLY MASS!! = NO REAL PHYSICS ! ================================================= IE REAL PHYSICS ----IS IN EMPTY SPCADE!! ---AND! MASS IN IT (mass in its many kinds ? and quantities) !!! ---- ATB Y.Porat ===============
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-04 02:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ea05c74f-ad81-4bcd-8f8f-9e71f84f13a6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644329 |
All those who hold e is mcc are Frauds. Waves have no mass. Em waves are an aetheric disturbance. I have already talked enough about this. Now i will move on to other areas of physics. Cheers. Arindam banerjee.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-04 07:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ac1c8f95-3049-4ae7-b3ed-cd826939a108@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644341 |
On Friday, August 4, 2017 at 12:38:13 PM UTC+3, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> All those who hold e is mcc are Frauds. Waves have no mass. Em waves are an aetheric disturbance. I have already talked enough about this. Now i will move on to other areas of physics. Cheers. Arindam banerjee.
===========================
ok
anyway you ignored a n important issue that I showed you
indeed not vary famous
I would say
known only to experts and I wonder why
because it is very important theoretically
ie
to know that em waves HAS MASS!
indeed it is no widely known because it is hidden in the
constant of the Maxwell equations
in its constants
it need taking some 'trouble ' to make
a dimension analysis of them !!
and find the mass hidden there !
anyway
keep well
and go on by innovating
but not just quick superficial 'drawings'
hope we will go on' keeping in touch''
I somehow appreciate your non conformism ..
==
ATB
Y.Porat
====================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-04 19:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ab99c18c-9fd3-4911-88cc-9f1ab8ad187e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644358 |
On Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 12:55:55 AM UTC+10, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, August 4, 2017 at 12:38:13 PM UTC+3, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > All those who hold e is mcc are Frauds. Waves have no mass. Em waves are an aetheric disturbance. I have already talked enough about this. Now i will move on to other areas of physics. Cheers. Arindam banerjee. > > =========================== > ok > anyway you ignored a n important issue that I showed you > indeed not vary famous > I would say > known only to experts and I wonder why > because it is very important theoretically > ie > to know that em waves HAS MASS! A disturbance does not have mass. It has other properties. It impacts on mass. When the disturbance is periodic and repetitive we call it a travelling wave. When the disturbance is one-time but progresses down some medium it travels as a wave. When the disturbance that is travelling wave gets reflected back and gets added to the forward wave we get a standing wave. Now this is too advanced a concept for non-microwave guys. If we allow that electromagnetic radiation is a wave (like gamma rays) and not particles (like alpha and beta rays) then we have to note that it is a disturbance. So it cannot have mass. But it will impact upon mass. > > indeed it is no widely known because it is hidden in the > constant of the Maxwell equations > in its constants > it need taking some 'trouble ' to make > a dimension analysis of them !! > and find the mass hidden there ! The force between the charges relate to mass in a dimensional way. That does not mean the waves have mass. It shows that waves contain energies manifesting as forces which will impact upon mass. And they certainly do impact upon the electrons around the atom. They move them around, and in this movement the wave energy is diminished and the atom energy goes up. Just as when we get sunshine we block the rays and get warm. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee > anyway > keep well > and go on by innovating > but not just quick superficial 'drawings' > > hope we will go on' keeping in touch'' > I somehow appreciate your non conformism .. > == > ATB > Y.Porat > ====================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 13:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <43dc874e-0d45-4cbf-9392-171e0e26f07b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644100 |
On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 4:00:44 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 1:23:52 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > On 8/1/17 7:17 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > Waves need a medium. > > > > No, they do not. Waves need only a system where the relevant laws are in > > the form of the wave equation, period, end of story. No medium is required. > > Only if the abstract is real, which suits the frauds but not engineers. > > > Somewhere in your education, you got the misinformation that waves > > require a medium. Where? > > From water waves requiring water > From sound waves requiring air/solid > From Mexican waves requiring humans > From vibration waves requiring a string > > Since these waves require a medium, electromagnetic waves need a medium. > Because it is the medium which must support and pass on the disturbance. > > The presence of electromagnetic waves can be physically seen when one does > VSWR measurements using a slotted coaxial line, and microwave generator and a > VSWR meter. > > While testing antenna and other microwave equipment from 1977 to 1987 I used > the above apparatus. > > Evidently waves exist and as waves cannot exist without a medium there has to > be a medium and that medium we call aether. > > It is quite another thing to neglect the medium for practical purposes. > But to say that a wave exists but there is no medium to propagate it, is > preposterous. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee Ocean waves its water.Sound waves its air.Magnetisum needs no medium.Think of Jupiters great magnetic waves going far out.Heat from sun does not come to Earth in waves.Think of photons that create heat. I have posted all this over 25 years ago when I turned 65 Trebert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 13:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <om01as$mr2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #644249 |
Devious "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> aka Glazier, <http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal> alias <http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017>, you are a sanctimonious Pig. Whatever you post belongs into the <http://tinyurl.com/Blog-of-2-fecal-kikes-Mar2017> in which you try to cover up that you are a Face Shitter & a Hatemonger, whose Glazierola you designed to get a response from "Arindam Banerjee" <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> who SwineBert Glazier hopes to be another new filthy misfits who'll join your existing crowd of 8 pigs who laid themselves under your sphincter, to get this: <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>. from you, ___ Glazier, the Turd-man of Anaheim___, who for the sake of **sheer spite**, perversion & bigotry refuses to accept <http://tinyurl.com/Herbert-Glazier-s-Reprieve>, as he waits for <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-Undertaker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-04 04:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4b093218-8d63-45af-9805-e097ecf4e00a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644249 |
A photon is a gull cycle em wave. It is caused by the stretching of the electron orbit to create a changing electric field. When it comes back to the original shape the wave is completed. Quantum theory is a patch and past its due date.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-04 18:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5984f045$0$17293$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #644347 |
On 8/4/2017 7:44 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > A photon is a gull cycle em wave. It is caused by the stretching of the electron orbit to create a changing electric field. When it comes back to the original shape the wave is completed. Quantum theory is a patch and past its due date. > \ Utter babbling engineering drool from a primitive who knows no real science.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-04 21:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <om39nf$1nq3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #644417 |
On 8/4/2017 5:08 PM, benj wrote: > On 8/4/2017 7:44 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> A photon is a gull cycle em wave. It is caused by the stretching of >> the electron orbit to create a changing electric field. When it comes >> back to the original shape the wave is completed. Quantum theory is a >> patch and past its due date. >> > \ > Utter babbling engineering drool from a primitive who knows no real > science. for his stories he gets free drinks at bars.......
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-05 21:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59866ab7$0$61769$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #644452 |
On 8/4/2017 10:14 PM, MaryK wrote: > On 8/4/2017 5:08 PM, benj wrote: >> On 8/4/2017 7:44 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> A photon is a gull cycle em wave. It is caused by the stretching of >>> the electron orbit to create a changing electric field. When it comes >>> back to the original shape the wave is completed. Quantum theory is a >>> patch and past its due date. >>> >> \ >> Utter babbling engineering drool from a primitive who knows no real >> science. > > for his stories he gets free drinks at bars....... My guess would be he gets a free ride on a bouncer out the door.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-04 19:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fbae1280-d9d5-41a0-9613-36f876696671@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644347 |
On Friday, August 4, 2017 at 9:44:09 PM UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > A photon is a gull cycle em wave. It is caused by the stretching of the electron orbit to create a changing electric field. When it comes back to the original shape the wave is completed. Quantum theory is a patch and past its due date. Oops, I had meant to write "a photon is FULL cycle electromagnetic wave". I had been parted from my computer at the hotel I spent last night. My skills with texting on my tablet are not great. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-05 21:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59866bf1$0$61769$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #644457 |
On 8/4/2017 10:46 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Friday, August 4, 2017 at 9:44:09 PM UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> A photon is a gull cycle em wave. It is caused by the stretching of the electron orbit to create a changing electric field. When it comes back to the original shape the wave is completed. Quantum theory is a patch and past its due date. > > Oops, I had meant to write "a photon is FULL cycle electromagnetic wave". > I had been parted from my computer at the hotel I spent last night. My skills > with texting on my tablet are not great. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee > Your skills at doing ANYTHING are obviously not great!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-06 05:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7b876767-15d1-42f9-b08b-0699027b262b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644688 |
On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 11:08:07 AM UTC+10, benj wrote: > On 8/4/2017 10:46 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Friday, August 4, 2017 at 9:44:09 PM UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> A photon is a gull cycle em wave. It is caused by the stretching of the electron orbit to create a changing electric field. When it comes back to the original shape the wave is completed. Quantum theory is a patch and past its due date. > > > > Oops, I had meant to write "a photon is FULL cycle electromagnetic wave". > > I had been parted from my computer at the hotel I spent last night. My skills > > with texting on my tablet are not great. > > > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > > > Your skills at doing > ANYTHING are obviously > not great! Okay what about this poem about you, stupid-ostrich benj. Will he swank in heaven? Will he rot in hell? Where will be benj, the boring man of drivel? No he won't swank in heaven, he won't rot in hell; In his next life he will be a noisy cockerel. heh-heh Cheers, Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 11 [1] 2 3 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web