Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #594988 > unrolled thread

Meteorology's Storm Theory Only Looks LIke Valid Science

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Meteorology's Storm Theory Only Looks LIke Valid Science James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 09:13 -0700
    Re: Meteorology's Storm Theory Only Looks LIke Valid Science Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2016-08-28 19:38 +0000
      Re: Meteorology's Storm Theory Only Looks LIke Valid Science James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 14:25 -0700
        Re: Meteorology's Storm Theory Only Looks LIke Valid Science jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-28 21:55 +0000
          Re: Meteorology's Storm Theory Only Looks LIke Valid Science James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 18:23 -0700
      Re: Meteorology's Storm Theory Only Looks LIke Valid Science Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-28 18:01 -0500
        Re: Meteorology's Storm Theory Only Looks LIke Valid Science James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 18:20 -0700

#594988 — Meteorology's Storm Theory Only Looks LIke Valid Science

It's funny, but when I first set out to tell the world of my new theory I expected people to be thankful that I was reviving an intellectually dead subject. Convection theory was so ephemeral and vague that I knew nobody would or could defend it, as has been the case. However, I never expected the depth of emotions that people have for what is such a non-starter of a theory. I now realize that this is just normal for humans. When a scientific theory is devoid of details and facts people's minds just naturally fill-in those details with their imagination, like children do with fairy tales. And they are more emotionally attached to these created details than they would be if the details were conveyed to them by somebody or if they had read them in a book. 

Unlike any of my fellow students, when I took meteorology classes I was already well educated in physics, chemistry, math and geology. So the brain-washing aspects of meteorological indoctrination didn't have the effect on me that it had on my classmates and that it, apparently, has had on all other meteorologists. Even then I was skeptical. I had gone out of my way to take the class because I was deeply curious about severe weather. I remember sitting there as the professor explained that convection was what powered all storms. "That couldn't be right," I said to myself, "how could such a benign process as convection underlie the power and majesty of thunderstorms, tornadoes and hurricanes? There has got to be something more to it than just that." 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#594997

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> It's funny, but when I first set out to tell the world of my new theory
> I expected people to be thankful that I was reviving an intellectually
> dead subject.

Just shows how fucking insane you are.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594998

On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 12:46:05 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > It's funny, but when I first set out to tell the world of my new theory
> > I expected people to be thankful that I was reviving an intellectually
> > dead subject.
> 
> Just shows how fucking insane you are.

It must be frustrating to so sure your are right and so incapable of explaining how or why.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#595002

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 12:46:05 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
>> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > 
>> > It's funny, but when I first set out to tell the world of my new theory
>> > I expected people to be thankful that I was reviving an intellectually
>> > dead subject.
>> 
>> Just shows how fucking insane you are.
> 
> It must be frustrating to so sure your are right and so incapable of
> explaining how or why.

It must be frustrating that the only responses to your many posts, other
than your own pretending to be someone else, is people remarking what a
fucking kook you are.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#595020

On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 3:01:07 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 12:46:05 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
> >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > It's funny, but when I first set out to tell the world of my new theory
> >> > I expected people to be thankful that I was reviving an intellectually
> >> > dead subject.
> >> 
> >> Just shows how fucking insane you are.
> > 
> > It must be frustrating to so sure your are right and so incapable of
> > explaining how or why.
> 
> It must be frustrating that the only responses to your many posts, other
> than your own pretending to be someone else, is people remarking what a
> fucking kook you are.
> 

I'm already getting good viewage on this.  Thanks for helping me stay on top, if you know what I mean.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#595006

On 8/28/2016 2:38 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It's funny, but when I first set out to tell the world of my new theory
>> I expected people to be thankful that I was reviving an intellectually
>> dead subject.
>
> Just shows how fucking insane you are.
>
>



James is not "reviving" anything, he is a preacher in a graveyard of 
one; him and his Dehydrated Water Vapor, DOA.  Why should anyone thank a 
obvious liar for his lies and/or a retard for not taking his meds ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#595019

On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 4:01:03 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
> On 8/28/2016 2:38 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
> > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> It's funny, but when I first set out to tell the world of my new theory
> >> I expected people to be thankful that I was reviving an intellectually
> >> dead subject.
> >
> > Just shows how fucking insane you are.
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> James is not "reviving" anything, he is a preacher in a graveyard of 
> one; him and his Dehydrated Water Vapor, DOA.  Why should anyone thank a 
> obvious liar for his lies and/or a retard for not taking his meds ?

Don't give up.  Keep looking.  The evidence has just got to be out there somewhere.  After all, 40,000 meteorologists couldn't be wrong, could they? 

Uh . . . er, uh . . . er.

Whatever the case, just keep looking.  You know, keep your mind active.

Get along now.  

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web