Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #607283 > unrolled thread
| Started by | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-11-30 18:03 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-12-01 16:29 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 167 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-30 18:03 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-30 16:03 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-30 20:39 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-30 19:48 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-30 20:49 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 16:28 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 14:18 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-12-01 14:40 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-01 17:03 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-01 04:00 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-30 23:49 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 10:49 -0600
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 16:34 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-12-02 00:21 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 08:37 -0600
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-12-07 03:32 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 09:00 -0600
ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 07:50 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-01 19:02 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 11:22 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-01 22:43 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 20:18 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-02 03:35 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 11:35 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 11:48 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:40 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:53 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 16:43 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-01 22:45 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 16:41 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 13:59 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 19:47 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 14:24 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 20:13 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 18:06 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 18:04 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-02 23:34 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 19:21 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-03 01:18 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-03 18:03 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-04 00:09 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-03 19:25 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-04 03:32 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-05 18:30 -0500
Einstein, and many others, say "God" is (mother) nature. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-02 20:00 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 04:19 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-03 18:13 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 18:09 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-03 19:12 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-03 22:34 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-03 19:54 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-04 04:12 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-04 10:43 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-04 11:34 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-04 14:30 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-05 18:38 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-05 18:39 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-03 22:20 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-03 20:19 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-04 04:04 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-05 18:37 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-06 19:58 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-07 18:05 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-08 12:17 -0800
notation, rotation, fundation (donation\thankyou noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 21:58 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 07:00 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-07 18:11 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 16:00 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-07 19:51 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-07 19:54 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 17:35 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 06:27 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 07:45 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 08:17 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 08:20 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 08:39 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-09 18:23 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 17:04 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 18:52 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-10 06:29 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-10 08:28 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-10 11:46 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-10 18:04 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-10 18:02 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-10 18:02 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-12 17:52 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 15:19 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-13 19:36 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 15:23 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-12 23:52 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 10:27 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-13 19:57 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 14:24 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-13 19:45 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-13 19:51 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 12:10 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-14 20:55 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 13:23 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-14 22:07 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 14:48 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-14 23:11 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 16:10 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-14 20:26 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-15 01:42 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-16 17:47 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-16 23:45 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-14 20:00 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-15 01:32 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-14 19:53 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-15 01:35 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-16 17:43 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-16 23:47 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-16 20:22 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-17 01:38 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-14 18:06 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-14 23:27 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-13 19:41 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-14 01:00 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-14 18:28 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-15 00:04 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-14 20:21 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-15 01:43 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-16 17:48 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-16 23:47 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-13 19:38 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-10 18:02 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-12 17:55 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-12 23:50 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-13 19:39 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-14 00:52 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-14 17:19 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-14 23:14 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-14 20:10 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-15 01:40 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-16 17:45 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-16 23:40 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-12-12 20:22 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-10 18:02 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 15:13 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-13 19:34 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 15:13 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-13 19:35 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 15:13 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-10 02:20 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC b "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-09 21:22 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-09 18:12 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-09 17:57 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 16:01 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-07 19:55 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 16:01 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-07 19:56 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-02 03:38 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-01 22:50 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 20:21 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-01 18:06 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 18:06 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-02 17:02 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 20:32 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-02 18:07 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-03 18:07 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-03 15:47 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-03 19:41 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-03 18:28 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-03 22:28 -0500
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-03 20:03 -0800
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-02 03:46 +0000
Re: ODD, CHIMP, and HVAC … RELIGIOUS FUNDIES benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 16:29 -0500
Page 6 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-14 23:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <i509id-jae.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #609045 |
HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: > ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com > - show quoted text - > There could well be 5 or more as such fringe research was all the rage > at the height of the Cold War and projects with dubious results got more > funding for "further study" in the paranoia of the times. > > Even the UK got on the bandwagon as late as 2002 but they got null > results from the beginning and wisely dumped the whole thing. > ------- > > > > Well, that should make BJs job of showing me where he got his > information quite easy > > Plus, I want to read exactly what he read to convince him that > the paranormal is real. Perhaps it will convince me as well If all you read is the original Fleischmann-Pons experiment it will likely convince you cold fusion is real. For all BJ's screed about "science" he can not seem to understand that one experiment getting some set of results is meaningless until the expirement has been repeated and verified by others. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-14 16:10 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8ab83c6e-11d2-4513-9d29-dd114682bf98@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #609052 |
ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com - show quoted text - If all you read is the original Fleischmann-Pons experiment it will likely convince you cold fusion is real. For all BJ's screed about "science" he can not seem to understand that one experiment getting some set of results is meaningless until the expirement has been repeated and verified by others. ----------- BJ has an answer for that. It's all a part of the vast conspiracy of the government to sap and impurify our precious bodily fluids
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-14 20:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5851f138$0$11942$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #609069 |
On 12/14/2016 7:10 PM, HVAC wrote: > ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com > - show quoted text - > If all you read is the original Fleischmann-Pons experiment it will > likely convince you cold fusion is real. > > For all BJ's screed about "science" he can not seem to understand that > one experiment getting some set of results is meaningless until the > expirement has been repeated and verified by others. > ----------- > > BJ has an answer for that. It's all a part of the vast conspiracy of the government to sap and impurify our precious bodily fluids > So you have no knowledge of the century of research and the thousands of experiments? How do you suppose those government reports were able to come to their positive conclusions? Because through all those experiments all the imagined objections were eliminates one by one until NONE remained. Any clown can just shoot off their mouth. Bert does it all the time. He's not getting a Nobel Prize. Trust me. Neither are you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-15 01:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <b099id-v5f.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #609091 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 12/14/2016 7:10 PM, HVAC wrote: >> ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com >> - show quoted text - >> If all you read is the original Fleischmann-Pons experiment it will >> likely convince you cold fusion is real. >> >> For all BJ's screed about "science" he can not seem to understand that >> one experiment getting some set of results is meaningless until the >> expirement has been repeated and verified by others. >> ----------- >> >> BJ has an answer for that. It's all a part of the vast conspiracy of the government to sap and impurify our precious bodily fluids >> > So you have no knowledge of the century of research and the thousands of > experiments? How do you suppose those government reports were able to > come to their positive conclusions? Flawed methods and flawed statistics as all attempts to reproduce them have shown kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-16 17:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <58546ef1$0$43086$b1db1813$19ace300@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #609097 |
On 12/14/2016 8:42 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 12/14/2016 7:10 PM, HVAC wrote: >>> ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com >>> - show quoted text - >>> If all you read is the original Fleischmann-Pons experiment it will >>> likely convince you cold fusion is real. >>> >>> For all BJ's screed about "science" he can not seem to understand that >>> one experiment getting some set of results is meaningless until the >>> expirement has been repeated and verified by others. >>> ----------- >>> >>> BJ has an answer for that. It's all a part of the vast conspiracy of the government to sap and impurify our precious bodily fluids >>> >> So you have no knowledge of the century of research and the thousands of >> experiments? How do you suppose those government reports were able to >> come to their positive conclusions? > > Flawed methods and flawed statistics as all attempts to reproduce them > have shown kook. Report evaluations of experiments show your statements to be a total lie. Learn what CURRENT ESP debunkers are saying. You ARE SO behind the times.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-16 23:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <muaeid-2r2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #609293 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 12/14/2016 8:42 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 12/14/2016 7:10 PM, HVAC wrote: >>>> ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>> - show quoted text - >>>> If all you read is the original Fleischmann-Pons experiment it will >>>> likely convince you cold fusion is real. >>>> >>>> For all BJ's screed about "science" he can not seem to understand that >>>> one experiment getting some set of results is meaningless until the >>>> expirement has been repeated and verified by others. >>>> ----------- >>>> >>>> BJ has an answer for that. It's all a part of the vast conspiracy of the government to sap and impurify our precious bodily fluids >>>> >>> So you have no knowledge of the century of research and the thousands of >>> experiments? How do you suppose those government reports were able to >>> come to their positive conclusions? >> >> Flawed methods and flawed statistics as all attempts to reproduce them >> have shown kook. > > Report evaluations of experiments show your statements to be a total > lie. Learn what CURRENT ESP debunkers are saying. You ARE SO behind the > times. Got anything later than 2015 kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-14 20:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5851eb45$0$10144$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #609045 |
On 12/14/2016 5:48 PM, HVAC wrote: > ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com > - show quoted text - > There could well be 5 or more as such fringe research was all the rage > at the height of the Cold War and projects with dubious results got more > funding for "further study" in the paranoia of the times. > > Even the UK got on the bandwagon as late as 2002 but they got null > results from the beginning and wisely dumped the whole thing. > ------- > > > > Well, that should make BJs job of showing me where he got his information quite easy > > Plus, I want to read exactly what he read to convince him that the paranormal is real. Perhaps it will convince me as well > So read them. Or you can just believe Chimp that it was all about the cold war and all results were negative (except those published in Nature and IEEE and the army and CIA and Congressional reports which are all "fringe" organizations and conspiracy theory agencies) Note reports are from 1981 -1995 which goes well beyond the cold war. I guess we were just as dumb as the Brits.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-15 01:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7f89id-v5f.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #609077 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 12/14/2016 5:48 PM, HVAC wrote: >> ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com >> - show quoted text - >> There could well be 5 or more as such fringe research was all the rage >> at the height of the Cold War and projects with dubious results got more >> funding for "further study" in the paranoia of the times. >> >> Even the UK got on the bandwagon as late as 2002 but they got null >> results from the beginning and wisely dumped the whole thing. >> ------- >> >> >> >> Well, that should make BJs job of showing me where he got his information quite easy >> >> Plus, I want to read exactly what he read to convince him that the paranormal is real. Perhaps it will convince me as well >> > So read them. Or you can just believe Chimp that it was all about the > cold war and all results were negative (except those published in Nature > and IEEE and the army and CIA and Congressional reports which are all > "fringe" organizations and conspiracy theory agencies) Note reports are > from 1981 -1995 which goes well beyond the cold war. I guess we were > just as dumb as the Brits. I never said that kook lier. What I said was: The Cold War was the MOTIVATION for a lot of kook research by a lot of people. The published results of many of them claimed postive results or results indicating further study was required. Subsequent reviews and attempts to reproduce positive results all failed when flawed methods and invalid statistics were fixed. No study of the paranormal with positive results has ever shown to be reproducable. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-14 19:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5851e97c$0$59747$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #609038 |
On 12/14/2016 5:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >> ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com >> - show quoted text - >> I am sure he has such but what he fails to have is the independent peer >> reviews that rip those experiments to shreds much like all the reviews >> and attempts to reproduce cold fusion "success". >> ---------- >> >> I don't believed what he claimed. Having 5 or so official government >> documents where they have their opinion that *anything* paranormal is real. >> >> Not for one minute > > There could well be 5 or more as such fringe research was all the rage > at the height of the Cold War and projects with dubious results got more > funding for "further study" in the paranoia of the times. > > Even the UK got on the bandwagon as late as 2002 but they got null > results from the beginning and wisely dumped the whole thing. So you say the government is full of kooks and does fringe kook studies. Sure, The positive conclusions were all kook scientists and looneys. They should have had you telling them what to find so they didnt waste their time. Note that some of these agencies were as skeptical and of "kook" views BEFORE they looked into it. None of the final reports held that view.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-15 01:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2k89id-v5f.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #609076 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 12/14/2016 5:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>> ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com >>> - show quoted text - >>> I am sure he has such but what he fails to have is the independent peer >>> reviews that rip those experiments to shreds much like all the reviews >>> and attempts to reproduce cold fusion "success". >>> ---------- >>> >>> I don't believed what he claimed. Having 5 or so official government >>> documents where they have their opinion that *anything* paranormal is real. >>> >>> Not for one minute >> >> There could well be 5 or more as such fringe research was all the rage >> at the height of the Cold War and projects with dubious results got more >> funding for "further study" in the paranoia of the times. >> >> Even the UK got on the bandwagon as late as 2002 but they got null >> results from the beginning and wisely dumped the whole thing. > > So you say the government is full of kooks and does fringe kook studies. > Sure, The positive conclusions were all kook scientists and looneys. Nope, that is not what I said lying kook. What I said was subsequent attempts to validate positive results all failed when flawed methods and invalid statistical methods were corrected. > They should have had you telling them what to find so they didnt waste > their time. Note that some of these agencies were as skeptical and of > "kook" views BEFORE they looked into it. None of the final reports held > that view. And all the final reports were later discredited kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-16 17:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <58546dfd$0$43086$b1db1813$19ace300@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #609095 |
On 12/14/2016 8:35 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 12/14/2016 5:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>> - show quoted text - >>>> I am sure he has such but what he fails to have is the independent peer >>>> reviews that rip those experiments to shreds much like all the reviews >>>> and attempts to reproduce cold fusion "success". >>>> ---------- >>>> >>>> I don't believed what he claimed. Having 5 or so official government >>>> documents where they have their opinion that *anything* paranormal is real. >>>> >>>> Not for one minute >>> >>> There could well be 5 or more as such fringe research was all the rage >>> at the height of the Cold War and projects with dubious results got more >>> funding for "further study" in the paranoia of the times. >>> >>> Even the UK got on the bandwagon as late as 2002 but they got null >>> results from the beginning and wisely dumped the whole thing. >> >> So you say the government is full of kooks and does fringe kook studies. >> Sure, The positive conclusions were all kook scientists and looneys. > > Nope, that is not what I said lying kook. > > What I said was subsequent attempts to validate positive results all > failed when flawed methods and invalid statistical methods were corrected. > >> They should have had you telling them what to find so they didnt waste >> their time. Note that some of these agencies were as skeptical and of >> "kook" views BEFORE they looked into it. None of the final reports held >> that view. > > And all the final reports were later discredited kook. Totally false. Get up to speed and current state of the art ESP debunking. MAybe then you won't be making such stooopid statements.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-16 23:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <s0beid-2r2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #609291 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 12/14/2016 8:35 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 12/14/2016 5:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>> I am sure he has such but what he fails to have is the independent peer >>>>> reviews that rip those experiments to shreds much like all the reviews >>>>> and attempts to reproduce cold fusion "success". >>>>> ---------- >>>>> >>>>> I don't believed what he claimed. Having 5 or so official government >>>>> documents where they have their opinion that *anything* paranormal is real. >>>>> >>>>> Not for one minute >>>> >>>> There could well be 5 or more as such fringe research was all the rage >>>> at the height of the Cold War and projects with dubious results got more >>>> funding for "further study" in the paranoia of the times. >>>> >>>> Even the UK got on the bandwagon as late as 2002 but they got null >>>> results from the beginning and wisely dumped the whole thing. >>> >>> So you say the government is full of kooks and does fringe kook studies. >>> Sure, The positive conclusions were all kook scientists and looneys. >> >> Nope, that is not what I said lying kook. >> >> What I said was subsequent attempts to validate positive results all >> failed when flawed methods and invalid statistical methods were corrected. >> >>> They should have had you telling them what to find so they didnt waste >>> their time. Note that some of these agencies were as skeptical and of >>> "kook" views BEFORE they looked into it. None of the final reports held >>> that view. >> >> And all the final reports were later discredited kook. > > Totally false. Get up to speed and current state of the art ESP > debunking. MAybe then you won't be making such stooopid statements. Got anything later than 2015 kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-16 20:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5854936a$0$34570$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #609325 |
On 12/16/2016 6:47 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 12/14/2016 8:35 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 12/14/2016 5:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>> I am sure he has such but what he fails to have is the independent peer >>>>>> reviews that rip those experiments to shreds much like all the reviews >>>>>> and attempts to reproduce cold fusion "success". >>>>>> ---------- >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't believed what he claimed. Having 5 or so official government >>>>>> documents where they have their opinion that *anything* paranormal is real. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not for one minute >>>>> >>>>> There could well be 5 or more as such fringe research was all the rage >>>>> at the height of the Cold War and projects with dubious results got more >>>>> funding for "further study" in the paranoia of the times. >>>>> >>>>> Even the UK got on the bandwagon as late as 2002 but they got null >>>>> results from the beginning and wisely dumped the whole thing. >>>> >>>> So you say the government is full of kooks and does fringe kook studies. >>>> Sure, The positive conclusions were all kook scientists and looneys. >>> >>> Nope, that is not what I said lying kook. >>> >>> What I said was subsequent attempts to validate positive results all >>> failed when flawed methods and invalid statistical methods were corrected. >>> >>>> They should have had you telling them what to find so they didnt waste >>>> their time. Note that some of these agencies were as skeptical and of >>>> "kook" views BEFORE they looked into it. None of the final reports held >>>> that view. >>> >>> And all the final reports were later discredited kook. >> >> Totally false. Get up to speed and current state of the art ESP >> debunking. MAybe then you won't be making such stooopid statements. > > Got anything later than 2015 kook? Oh I get it! Science is just like software where you MUST have the "latest version" of everything or you are incompetent. Sure. So you think that truth "expires" after a while and it has to be "refreshed". Did "Herb give you this "science"?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-17 01:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1hheid-4i3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #609344 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 12/16/2016 6:47 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 12/14/2016 8:35 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 12/14/2016 5:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>> I am sure he has such but what he fails to have is the independent peer >>>>>>> reviews that rip those experiments to shreds much like all the reviews >>>>>>> and attempts to reproduce cold fusion "success". >>>>>>> ---------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't believed what he claimed. Having 5 or so official government >>>>>>> documents where they have their opinion that *anything* paranormal is real. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not for one minute >>>>>> >>>>>> There could well be 5 or more as such fringe research was all the rage >>>>>> at the height of the Cold War and projects with dubious results got more >>>>>> funding for "further study" in the paranoia of the times. >>>>>> >>>>>> Even the UK got on the bandwagon as late as 2002 but they got null >>>>>> results from the beginning and wisely dumped the whole thing. >>>>> >>>>> So you say the government is full of kooks and does fringe kook studies. >>>>> Sure, The positive conclusions were all kook scientists and looneys. >>>> >>>> Nope, that is not what I said lying kook. >>>> >>>> What I said was subsequent attempts to validate positive results all >>>> failed when flawed methods and invalid statistical methods were corrected. >>>> >>>>> They should have had you telling them what to find so they didnt waste >>>>> their time. Note that some of these agencies were as skeptical and of >>>>> "kook" views BEFORE they looked into it. None of the final reports held >>>>> that view. >>>> >>>> And all the final reports were later discredited kook. >>> >>> Totally false. Get up to speed and current state of the art ESP >>> debunking. MAybe then you won't be making such stooopid statements. >> >> Got anything later than 2015 kook? > > Oh I get it! Science is just like software where you MUST have the > "latest version" of everything or you are incompetent. You are the one that started prattling on about "current state of the art" and I simply wanted to know if you had anything more rececnt than 2015, i.e. that latest I've seen, kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-14 18:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5851d084$0$7280$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #609034 |
On 12/14/2016 3:55 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >> BJ quacked >> HVAC has said that Remote viewing experiments showed nothing. >> At least 5 government agencies reviewed the data and concluded the >> opposite. I can prove it. >> ------------- >> >> More false claims. You have nothing except kook web sites > > I am sure he has such but what he fails to have is the independent peer > reviews that rip those experiments to shreds much like all the reviews > and attempts to reproduce cold fusion "success". > > So you think Nature and IEEE journals have no peer review? Which are you liar or ignorant?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-14 23:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <4319id-jae.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #609049 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 12/14/2016 3:55 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>> BJ quacked >>> HVAC has said that Remote viewing experiments showed nothing. >>> At least 5 government agencies reviewed the data and concluded the >>> opposite. I can prove it. >>> ------------- >>> >>> More false claims. You have nothing except kook web sites >> >> I am sure he has such but what he fails to have is the independent peer >> reviews that rip those experiments to shreds much like all the reviews >> and attempts to reproduce cold fusion "success". >> >> > So you think Nature and IEEE journals have no peer review? Which are you > liar or ignorant? Peer review of the experiment, i.e. the experiment being performed by peers and getting the same result, not review of the language of the original publication. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-13 19:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5850953b$0$34662$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #608818 |
On 12/12/2016 6:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >> BJ quacked >> I on the other hand can point to >> opinions of five or so government agencies (some of which were highly >> skeptical) who ALL agreed that Something significant was observed in the >> remote viewing experiments. You've got only your opinion and I have the >> authority of our government agencies. Which of us is the most credible. >> I know, I know, it's YOU because you have superpowers and the government >> agencies don't. Got it. >> ------------- >> >> OK I'll call your bluff. Post your cites. And I don't want some link >> to a kook web site or anything less than the official opinion of 5 or >> so government agencies. > > Or accredited universities. > > Chimp never heard of Stanford. Just one of them thar community colleges like you and HVAC attended. Personally I got a reject letter from Stanford which shows how high their standards are.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-14 01:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <66i6id-nb6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #608936 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 12/12/2016 6:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>> BJ quacked >>> I on the other hand can point to >>> opinions of five or so government agencies (some of which were highly >>> skeptical) who ALL agreed that Something significant was observed in the >>> remote viewing experiments. You've got only your opinion and I have the >>> authority of our government agencies. Which of us is the most credible. >>> I know, I know, it's YOU because you have superpowers and the government >>> agencies don't. Got it. >>> ------------- >>> >>> OK I'll call your bluff. Post your cites. And I don't want some link >>> to a kook web site or anything less than the official opinion of 5 or >>> so government agencies. >> >> Or accredited universities. >> >> > Chimp never heard of Stanford. Just one of them thar community colleges > like you and HVAC attended. Personally I got a reject letter from > Stanford which shows how high their standards are. Are you babbling about those discredited SRI studies? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing#Footnotes for the critiques that tear the SRI studies to shreads. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-14 18:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5851d5bd$0$1375$c3e8da3$1cbc7475@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #608942 |
On 12/13/2016 8:00 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 12/12/2016 6:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> BJ quacked >>>> I on the other hand can point to >>>> opinions of five or so government agencies (some of which were highly >>>> skeptical) who ALL agreed that Something significant was observed in the >>>> remote viewing experiments. You've got only your opinion and I have the >>>> authority of our government agencies. Which of us is the most credible. >>>> I know, I know, it's YOU because you have superpowers and the government >>>> agencies don't. Got it. >>>> ------------- >>>> >>>> OK I'll call your bluff. Post your cites. And I don't want some link >>>> to a kook web site or anything less than the official opinion of 5 or >>>> so government agencies. >>> >>> Or accredited universities. >>> >>> >> Chimp never heard of Stanford. Just one of them thar community colleges >> like you and HVAC attended. Personally I got a reject letter from >> Stanford which shows how high their standards are. > > Are you babbling about those discredited SRI studies? > > See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing#Footnotes for the > critiques that tear the SRI studies to shreads. Oh yeah! Wikipedia! WIN! Noting like censored "peer reviewed" Wiki to make your case. You are such a scientist. Maybe you need to go look up the five government reports I listed and quoted. perhaps you need to read the papers on the positive remote viewing results in Nature and IEEE. Maybe you need to grow a brain.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-15 00:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d939id-ole.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #609058 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 12/13/2016 8:00 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 12/12/2016 6:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> BJ quacked >>>>> I on the other hand can point to >>>>> opinions of five or so government agencies (some of which were highly >>>>> skeptical) who ALL agreed that Something significant was observed in the >>>>> remote viewing experiments. You've got only your opinion and I have the >>>>> authority of our government agencies. Which of us is the most credible. >>>>> I know, I know, it's YOU because you have superpowers and the government >>>>> agencies don't. Got it. >>>>> ------------- >>>>> >>>>> OK I'll call your bluff. Post your cites. And I don't want some link >>>>> to a kook web site or anything less than the official opinion of 5 or >>>>> so government agencies. >>>> >>>> Or accredited universities. >>>> >>>> >>> Chimp never heard of Stanford. Just one of them thar community colleges >>> like you and HVAC attended. Personally I got a reject letter from >>> Stanford which shows how high their standards are. >> >> Are you babbling about those discredited SRI studies? >> >> See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing#Footnotes for the >> critiques that tear the SRI studies to shreads. > > Oh yeah! Wikipedia! WIN! Noting like censored "peer reviewed" Wiki to > make your case. Note very carefully the "#Footnotes" at the end of the URL. This means I am pointing to the outside, independant references, NOT the wiki article itslelf, kook. > You are such a scientist. BJ the great scientist can not understand what a list of references is. > Maybe you need to go look up > the five government reports I listed and quoted. perhaps you need to > read the papers on the positive remote viewing results in Nature and > IEEE. Maybe you need to grow a brain. If you take time from your drooling screed and diatribes and read the REFERENCES I provided you, you will find what others have to say about those "five government reports" kook, i.e. they were all nonsense. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web