Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #638597 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-03 08:31 -0400 |
| Last post | 2017-07-26 14:08 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 337 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-03 08:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-07-03 09:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 06:31 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-03 08:37 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 15:21 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 13:14 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 08:00 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-07 15:34 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 14:03 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-07 17:22 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 15:19 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 17:01 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-09 12:49 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-09 23:26 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 20:04 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 07:32 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-10 12:21 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 17:35 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-10 16:10 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-10 17:40 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-10 17:22 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-10 19:49 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2017-07-13 20:17 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-13 21:42 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-13 20:53 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 02:05 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 23:25 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-03 17:04 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-03 14:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-03 18:28 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-03 16:14 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-03 20:57 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 16:14 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 00:45 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 20:11 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 04:55 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 02:29 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 06:49 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 18:02 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-07-04 22:59 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 04:51 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-04 21:33 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 07:16 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 16:47 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 11:08 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 21:02 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 19:12 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 22:16 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 23:30 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 09:35 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 10:05 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:20 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-07 08:03 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:19 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-06 13:09 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 23:05 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 10:52 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 18:07 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-05 14:21 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 19:34 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 15:32 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 23:00 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 10:12 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-06 13:15 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 06:20 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-07 09:39 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 08:11 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-07 14:13 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-06 20:04 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-04 20:08 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-04 09:11 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-07-04 11:47 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 18:19 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-07-04 23:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 04:56 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 23:16 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 18:12 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 07:20 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 16:54 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-05 18:42 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 23:07 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 09:30 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-06 06:35 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-06 16:34 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:25 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-07 04:56 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 02:09 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-07 20:18 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 06:19 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-07 17:13 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 06:49 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-08 17:13 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 07:12 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-09 17:44 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 12:48 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-09 23:27 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 07:11 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 16:30 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 06:49 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-11 17:47 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 13:15 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-11 16:27 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 14:46 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-11 18:36 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 18:20 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-11 21:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-11 22:12 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> - 2017-07-11 19:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 02:24 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 22:44 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-12 10:24 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 20:57 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 23:17 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:42 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 16:11 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 18:21 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-12 07:28 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 05:10 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 17:45 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-12 18:39 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 21:29 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-13 20:27 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 23:22 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-14 11:55 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 21:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 02:11 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 22:56 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 05:03 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:50 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 23:49 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 23:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 05:02 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 08:51 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 17:23 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 18:08 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 02:02 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 12:53 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 13:04 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-16 09:51 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 11:04 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 17:55 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-16 16:15 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 15:32 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:08 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-16 15:21 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:53 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 17:00 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 09:06 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-17 20:23 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 15:27 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-16 17:39 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2017-07-17 09:46 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:16 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 13:04 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 07:04 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 17:48 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 06:50 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-13 17:29 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 05:51 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 05:11 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-15 06:36 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-15 00:27 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 08:52 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 06:40 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-16 16:02 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 06:02 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-17 20:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 06:32 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-18 21:10 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 05:08 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-19 20:17 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 01:11 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 06:23 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 03:35 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 05:56 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-20 10:18 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-07-20 11:34 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 16:25 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 20:42 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 16:40 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 19:54 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-20 19:15 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 20:38 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-21 07:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 16:24 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 17:26 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-15 11:33 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 17:39 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 21:03 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 23:19 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:52 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 16:12 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 19:54 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 09:43 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-13 09:30 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-13 17:37 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 21:07 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 02:18 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 22:59 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 05:07 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 11:19 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-14 13:59 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:55 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 23:53 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 23:07 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 05:06 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 23:17 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 08:57 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 17:53 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 18:12 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 02:07 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 03:13 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-14 07:14 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 17:11 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-14 20:09 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 02:14 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-07-14 23:09 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 05:13 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 23:19 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-15 06:57 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 18:19 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 07:06 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 14:06 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 20:29 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-15 00:33 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-15 16:11 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 21:27 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 18:17 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-15 22:30 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-15 22:07 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 03:15 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 07:16 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 11:45 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:13 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 16:33 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:09 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 06:11 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:46 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 22:24 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 21:53 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 06:38 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 17:35 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 20:26 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 20:12 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 22:12 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-19 00:49 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 05:30 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-19 04:54 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 06:34 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-19 16:14 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 17:24 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-19 00:00 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-19 20:21 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-21 08:00 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-21 09:08 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 17:14 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 13:21 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-14 09:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 17:15 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 16:10 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-15 22:11 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 03:23 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-16 09:58 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 12:05 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:15 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-16 10:56 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:19 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 16:36 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-05 08:19 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-07-05 10:39 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 16:59 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 11:11 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 21:11 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 19:28 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:32 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 19:38 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-09 21:55 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 12:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-10 12:25 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-07-11 13:00 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 12:44 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 18:21 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 16:44 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 19:52 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 09:33 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 03:29 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 21:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-06 01:22 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 22:18 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-06 05:06 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:36 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-07 05:00 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-07 20:25 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-08 00:40 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 17:53 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-09 21:56 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 05:08 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 23:06 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 12:38 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 17:31 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 12:47 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 18:22 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 22:35 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2017-07-07 13:41 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2017-07-05 17:47 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-07-03 22:55 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 20:16 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Peter Stickney <p_stickney@verizon.net> - 2017-07-13 19:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-04 20:04 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-05 08:20 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 05:43 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-04 20:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 06:21 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2017-07-03 18:35 -0800
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 05:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-06 13:38 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 05:10 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-10 17:16 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 05:13 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 08:35 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-07 10:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-09 22:15 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2017-07-10 10:43 +0300
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-10 21:32 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 12:39 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-12 10:58 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 17:54 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-12 15:18 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 20:00 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-12 11:42 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-13 04:17 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 14:05 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-07-16 15:08 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-26 13:33 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-26 17:58 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-26 14:08 -0400
Page 10 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 17 Next page →
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-20 16:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <drf2nc5ld09dlkid9agomhg1dvvpmn8cbq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #641557 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:34:24 -0400, Phil Hobbs >> <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote: >> >>>On 07/20/2017 11:18 AM, Serg io wrote: >>>> On 7/19/2017 11:56 PM, David Mitchell wrote: >>>>> krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:08:56 +0100, David Mitchell >>>> >>>> >>>>>> Uh, the widely varying properties, maybe? Titanium and gold have >>>>>> slightly different properties. >>>>> >>>>> Jimp posted a reference to a Wikipedia article. You really should >>>>> read it. >>>>> We can 3-D print *right now*: >>>>> >>>>> Thermoplastics, eutectic metals, edible materials, Rubbers, Modeling >>>>> clay, Plasticine, Metal clay (including Precious Metal Clay), Ceramic >>>>> materials, Metal alloy, cermet, metal matrix composite, ceramic matrix >>>>> composite >>>>> Nylon or Nylon with short carbon fiber + reinforcement in the form >>>>> Carbon, Kevlar, Glass and Glass for high temperature fiber >>>>> Photopolymer,Photopolymer + thermally activated chemistry >>>>> Almost any metal alloy including Titanium alloys >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> why not print pizza.... ? should be a huge demand for that... >>> >>>I saw a pancake printer at Makerfest a few years ago. The pancakes were >>>pretty good tasting too. >> >> Why would you print, rather than extrude? >> > >Some people are monomaniacal about 3D printing. > Yes, you are, and the rest of us wish you would STFU. -- You are What you do When it counts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-20 19:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <qig2nclqak1or6kminv6eapkviq87fmrnv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #641557 |
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 20:42:26 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:34:24 -0400, Phil Hobbs >> <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote: >> >>>On 07/20/2017 11:18 AM, Serg io wrote: >>>> On 7/19/2017 11:56 PM, David Mitchell wrote: >>>>> krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:08:56 +0100, David Mitchell >>>> >>>> >>>>>> Uh, the widely varying properties, maybe? Titanium and gold have >>>>>> slightly different properties. >>>>> >>>>> Jimp posted a reference to a Wikipedia article. You really should >>>>> read it. >>>>> We can 3-D print *right now*: >>>>> >>>>> Thermoplastics, eutectic metals, edible materials, Rubbers, Modeling >>>>> clay, Plasticine, Metal clay (including Precious Metal Clay), Ceramic >>>>> materials, Metal alloy, cermet, metal matrix composite, ceramic matrix >>>>> composite >>>>> Nylon or Nylon with short carbon fiber + reinforcement in the form >>>>> Carbon, Kevlar, Glass and Glass for high temperature fiber >>>>> Photopolymer,Photopolymer + thermally activated chemistry >>>>> Almost any metal alloy including Titanium alloys >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> why not print pizza.... ? should be a huge demand for that... >>> >>>I saw a pancake printer at Makerfest a few years ago. The pancakes were >>>pretty good tasting too. >> >> Why would you print, rather than extrude? > >Some people are monomaniacal about 3D printing. I guess the difference is the size of the dot. Pancakes are just a big dot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-20 19:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okrh30$1i22$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #641593 |
On 7/20/2017 6:54 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 20:42:26 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >>> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:34:24 -0400, Phil Hobbs >>> <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote: >>> >>>> On 07/20/2017 11:18 AM, Serg io wrote: >>>>> On 7/19/2017 11:56 PM, David Mitchell wrote: >>>>>> krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:08:56 +0100, David Mitchell >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> Uh, the widely varying properties, maybe? Titanium and gold have >>>>>>> slightly different properties. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jimp posted a reference to a Wikipedia article. You really should >>>>>> read it. >>>>>> We can 3-D print *right now*: >>>>>> Thermoplastics, eutectic metals, edible materials, Rubbers, Modeling >>>>>> clay, Plasticine, Metal clay (including Precious Metal Clay), Ceramic >>>>>> materials, Metal alloy, cermet, metal matrix composite, ceramic matrix >>>>>> composite >>>>>> Nylon or Nylon with short carbon fiber + reinforcement in the form >>>>>> Carbon, Kevlar, Glass and Glass for high temperature fiber >>>>>> Photopolymer,Photopolymer + thermally activated chemistry >>>>>> Almost any metal alloy including Titanium alloys >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> why not print pizza.... ? should be a huge demand for that... >>>> >>>> I saw a pancake printer at Makerfest a few years ago. The pancakes were >>>> pretty good tasting too. >>> >>> Why would you print, rather than extrude? >> >> Some people are monomaniacal about 3D printing. > > I guess the difference is the size of the dot. Pancakes are just a > big dot. > Pizza is a big dot, with smaller dots on it. embedded dots.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-20 20:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n7j2nct3hbn95f1f8uib536k0v3ehorgrc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #641599 |
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 19:15:20 -0500, Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> wrote: >On 7/20/2017 6:54 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote: >> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 20:42:26 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:34:24 -0400, Phil Hobbs >>>> <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 07/20/2017 11:18 AM, Serg io wrote: >>>>>> On 7/19/2017 11:56 PM, David Mitchell wrote: >>>>>>> krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:08:56 +0100, David Mitchell >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Uh, the widely varying properties, maybe? Titanium and gold have >>>>>>>> slightly different properties. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jimp posted a reference to a Wikipedia article. You really should >>>>>>> read it. >>>>>>> We can 3-D print *right now*: > >>>>>>> Thermoplastics, eutectic metals, edible materials, Rubbers, Modeling >>>>>>> clay, Plasticine, Metal clay (including Precious Metal Clay), Ceramic >>>>>>> materials, Metal alloy, cermet, metal matrix composite, ceramic matrix >>>>>>> composite >>>>>>> Nylon or Nylon with short carbon fiber + reinforcement in the form >>>>>>> Carbon, Kevlar, Glass and Glass for high temperature fiber >>>>>>> Photopolymer,Photopolymer + thermally activated chemistry >>>>>>> Almost any metal alloy including Titanium alloys >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> why not print pizza.... ? should be a huge demand for that... >>>>> >>>>> I saw a pancake printer at Makerfest a few years ago. The pancakes were >>>>> pretty good tasting too. >>>> >>>> Why would you print, rather than extrude? >>> >>> Some people are monomaniacal about 3D printing. >> >> I guess the difference is the size of the dot. Pancakes are just a >> big dot. >> > >Pizza is a big dot, with smaller dots on it. embedded dots. Recursive dots.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-21 07:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.33dba906a309262d98999a@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #641525 |
In article <okqhk5$1oim$1@gioia.aioe.org>, invaalid@invalid.com says... > > On 7/19/2017 11:56 PM, David Mitchell wrote: > > krw@notreal.com wrote: > >> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:08:56 +0100, David Mitchell > > > >> Uh, the widely varying properties, maybe? Titanium and gold have > >> slightly different properties. > > > > Jimp posted a reference to a Wikipedia article. You really should read it. > > We can 3-D print *right now*: > > > > Thermoplastics, eutectic metals, edible materials, Rubbers, Modeling > > clay, Plasticine, Metal clay (including Precious Metal Clay), Ceramic > > materials, Metal alloy, cermet, metal matrix composite, ceramic matrix > > composite > > Nylon or Nylon with short carbon fiber + reinforcement in the form > > Carbon, Kevlar, Glass and Glass for high temperature fiber > > Photopolymer,Photopolymer + thermally activated chemistry > > Almost any metal alloy including Titanium alloys > > > > > > why not print pizza.... ? should be a huge demand for that... I believe this has already been done. http://www.businessinsider.com/beehex-pizza-3d-printer-2017-3 While not a printed pizza, the first "pizza ATM" was installed in my state: http://www.nbcnews.com/feature/college-game-plan/nation-s-first-pizza- atm-opens-xavier-university-cincinnati-n626501 If these things can be profitable anywhere, it's on college campuses. Jeff -- All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone. These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends, employer, or any organization that I am a member of.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-20 16:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <a542nchgs7dkl368u7mcpjtf56k6meuekk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #641499 |
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:56:40 +0100, David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >krw@notreal.com wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:08:56 +0100, David Mitchell >> <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 06:32:42 +0100, David Mitchell >>>> <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 06:02:37 +0100, David Mitchell >>>>>> <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 06:40:16 +0100, David Mitchell >>>>>>>> <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 06:36:41 +0100, David Mitchell >>>>>>>>>> <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Yes I could. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Star Trek reruns. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bless. It's almost as though you imagine anyone give even the tinest of fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what you think. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's almost as though you imagine I think puerile techno nerds represent >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the average person. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you need to find a better insult - "techno nerd" is a bit tautologous - >>>>>>>>>>>>> and I've never made any particular claim to represent anyone. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> How about pie-in-the-sky dreamer? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Like I've said before, most people can't be bothered to make things as >>>>>>>>>>>> trivial as bread and biscuits. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Well, lots of people *do* make bread and biscuits; and a series about baking was >>>>>>>>>>> one of the most popular UK programs for some time. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Watching is not making. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> True; but search for "The Great British Off effect". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "In the six years it has been on the air, “The Great British Bake Off” has >>>>>>>>> fundamentally changed the way the British regard baking, dessert-eating and even >>>>>>>>> their own culture of sweets. The “Bake Off Effect,” as it is known, has >>>>>>>>> manifested in a resurgence in home baking, a noticeable increase in the quality >>>>>>>>> of baked goods sold all over the country, and a growing number of people >>>>>>>>> pursuing careers as professional pastry chefs." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "The Mary Berry effect: How the Great British Bake Off revived the Women's Institute >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> WI membership reached 211,000 last year, its highest level since the 1970s >>>>>>>>> 22,600 new members joined last year and 144 institutes were created >>>>>>>>> Organisation's chairman said Great British Bakeoff 'inspired' more women to >>>>>>>>> take up home baking" >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "A recent survey from Waitrose revealed that baking is more popular than ever, >>>>>>>>> with 19 per cent of people saying they now bake at least once a week and nearly >>>>>>>>> half admitted to baking more than they did five years ago." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Irrelevant. My wife watches a lot (way too much ;-) of cooking shows >>>>>>>> and also does a lot of baking but not once has she ever made anything >>>>>>>> that was on the TeeVee. She does make biscuits, on special occasions, >>>>>>>> but not bread. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ah yes, your one anecdote easily trumps my three data points. >>>>>>> Seriously? That's your counter? One person? >>>>>>> Wait! I know two people who bake! I win! >>>>>> >>>>>> No, stupid. The existence of cooking shows doesn't mean everyone is >>>>>> cooking. There are a couple of networks dedicated to buying homes but >>>>>> more people aren't buying houses every week. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bread machines were once popular but are a total bust, these days. >>>>> >>>>> I didn't say "everyone was baking". >>>>> I said "19 per cent of people saying they now bake at least once a week and >>>>> nearly half admitted to baking more than they did five years ago." >>>> >>>> And half bought swamp land in Florida. >>> >>> Actual sales are noticeable up (as I quoted) in actual shops. >>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As I keep, apparently, having to explain - I am talking about *mature* >>>>>>> fabrication technology - something capable of working with multiple materials. >>>>>> >>>>>> It really would be nice if you could read. Mature doesn't matted if >>>>>> there is no need. >>>>> Let me try to put in easier terms for you: when nearly any form of technology >>>>> first appears it is often expensive and limited, so only the "early adopters" >>>>> pick it up. That market is sometimes enough to drive the development of better, >>>>> cheaper devices; and as a consequence, more people buy them. >>>>> This cycle continues. >>>>> >>>>> You know this to be true, right? >>>> >>>> It's obvious to any non-geek. They're not going to want it. Personal >>>> computers would have forever been a toy, except for one or two >>>> applications (financial and Internet). Video players biggest (by far) >>>> "app" was porn, then the Internet made that silly. 3D printing? WHo >>>> wants cheap plastic jewelry? >>> >>> As I keep, apparently, having to explain - I am talking about *mature* >>> fabrication technology - something capable of working with multiple materials. >> >> You can dream all you want but that's all it is, just another one of >> your hallucinations. Materials are so different that it's highly >> unlikely that there will be a cheap way of building from multiple >> materials with one machine. Just the temperature variations alone... > >You don't have to do it all in the same cabinet. Some assembly may be required. >Having said that, interchangeable print heads on a carousel would probably work >for a subset of all possible materials. That's simply absurd. You're sharing nothing but the cabinet, then. Do you think that every tool in a machine shop sits in one frame? >> >> Not to mention waste. No one is going to be printing gold or silver >> (jewelry). > >Why do you think 3-D printing is inherently wasteful? It's a lot more wasteful than casting. Since it's distributed, it has to be. >> Uh, the widely varying properties, maybe? Titanium and gold have >> slightly different properties. > >Jimp posted a reference to a Wikipedia article. You really should read it. >We can 3-D print *right now*: Not in the home and not with various metals and plastics in the same machine. >Thermoplastics, eutectic metals, edible materials, Rubbers, Modeling clay, >Plasticine, Metal clay (including Precious Metal Clay), Ceramic materials, Metal >alloy, cermet, metal matrix composite, ceramic matrix composite >Nylon or Nylon with short carbon fiber + reinforcement in the form Carbon, >Kevlar, Glass and Glass for high temperature fiber >Photopolymer,Photopolymer + thermally activated chemistry >Almost any metal alloy including Titanium alloys Toys. > >> >>>> Was the growth of personal computers "linear"? VCRs? Sure, there are >>>> geeks playing with the things, until they get bored making useless >>>> trinkets. >>> >>> There you are again, playing the trinket card; which I've already trumped. >> >> No, you haven't. > >See above. Still waiting. (No, not really because you can't.) > >> You just keep hallucinating. > >I notice you share a characteristic with jimp, when you have no actual facts, >the arguments become personal. It's quite revealing. yes, we both know you're just a fanboi. Another hallucinating geek.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-15 17:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qrvp3e-ndr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #640585 |
In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes. Yes I could. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>>>>> >>>>>> Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching >>>>>> Star Trek reruns. >>>>>> >>>>> Bless. It's almost as though you imagine anyone give even the tinest of fucks >>>>> what you think. >>>> >>>> It's almost as though you imagine I think puerile techno nerds represent >>>> the average person. >>> >>> I think you need to find a better insult - "techno nerd" is a bit tautologous - >>> and I've never made any particular claim to represent anyone. >> >> How about pie-in-the-sky dreamer? >> >> Like I've said before, most people can't be bothered to make things as >> trivial as bread and biscuits. > > Well, lots of people *do* make bread and biscuits; and a series about baking was > one of the most popular UK programs for some time. Do you know the meaning of the word "most"? > As I keep, apparently, having to explain - I am talking about *mature* > fabrication technology - something capable of working with multiple materials, > and able to fabricate something at the push of a button more quickly than > driving to buy it, and more cheaply. In other words, a Star Trek replicator which doesn't exist and likely will never exist. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-15 11:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9jgkmclf2901oiv58k7sprjq1drqoi9t7h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640326 |
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:29:28 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >It's almost as though you imagine I think puerile techno nerds represent >the average person. Not to belabor a point, but about those nerds.... They invented the aerospace industry. They invented the electronics industry, and made out pretty well. They invented information and communication technology and took money to the bank by the truckload. (Seeing a trend here?) They're busily engaged in inventing robots, biological engineering, applied genetics. So, no, they don't represent the average person. They represent the above-average person. I'm a nerd, in my own modest way, and damn' proud of it. Hell Jim, you used to be an electrical engineer, didn't you? Have you thanked a nerd lately? You should. -- R L Watkins
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-15 17:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cj0q3e-ndr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #640632 |
In sci.physics Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:29:28 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>It's almost as though you imagine I think puerile techno nerds represent >>the average person. > > Not to belabor a point, but about those nerds.... > > They invented the aerospace industry. They invented the electronics > industry, and made out pretty well. They invented information and > communication technology and took money to the bank by the truckload. > (Seeing a trend here?) They're busily engaged in inventing robots, > biological engineering, applied genetics. Most of the people involved were hard working, level headed engineers and programmers working in teams not socially inept loners in mommy's basement. > So, no, they don't represent the average person. They represent the > above-average person. > > I'm a nerd, in my own modest way, and damn' proud of it. Your definition of nerd is not my definition of nerd. > Hell Jim, you used to be an electrical engineer, didn't you? Have you > thanked a nerd lately? You should. Nope. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-13 21:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <v16gmcts0k5o1e1mkbrm29nfk03mvimgfp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640276 |
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:50:39 +0100, David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>> >>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>> >>>> Could you be any more vague? >>> >>> Yes. Yes I could. >>> >>> Things. People will make things. All of the things. >> >> Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching >> Star Trek reruns. >> >Bless. It's almost as though you imagine anyone give even the tinest of fucks >what you think. You're reading his posts and answering. Apparently _you_ give at least the tiniest fuck what he thinks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-13 23:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <jiogmc9d6em3jaqt73s3antgu2t81kltsh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640399 |
krw@notreal.com wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:50:39 +0100, David Mitchell
><david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you be any more vague?
>>>>
>>>> Yes. Yes I could.
>>>>
>>>> Things. People will make things. All of the things.
>>>
>>> Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching
>>> Star Trek reruns.
>>>
>>Bless. It's almost as though you imagine anyone give even the tinest of fucks
>>what you think.
>
>You're reading his posts and answering. Apparently _you_ give at
>least the tiniest fuck what he thinks.
>
One needn't give a fuck what someone thinks in order to recognize
their outbursts as worthy of derision.
--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 17:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <48fimclt4bmsqihpslj165rp8197ku26ct@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640425 |
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 23:19:36 -0700, Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >krw@notreal.com wrote: > >>On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:50:39 +0100, David Mitchell >><david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>>> >>>>> Yes. Yes I could. >>>>> >>>>> Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>>> >>>> Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching >>>> Star Trek reruns. >>>> >>>Bless. It's almost as though you imagine anyone give even the tinest of fucks >>>what you think. >> >>You're reading his posts and answering. Apparently _you_ give at >>least the tiniest fuck what he thinks. >> > >One needn't give a fuck what someone thinks in order to recognize >their outbursts as worthy of derision. You obviously care enough to answer. As stupid as you are, you have to see that much.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 16:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <vujimcdaa9qbt9g38n5761f4npo8iae7kc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640525 |
krw@notreal.com wrote: >On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 23:19:36 -0700, Fred J. McCall ><fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > >>krw@notreal.com wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:50:39 +0100, David Mitchell >>><david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes. Yes I could. >>>>>> >>>>>> Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>>>> >>>>> Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching >>>>> Star Trek reruns. >>>>> >>>>Bless. It's almost as though you imagine anyone give even the tinest of fucks >>>>what you think. >>> >>>You're reading his posts and answering. Apparently _you_ give at >>>least the tiniest fuck what he thinks. >>> >> >>One needn't give a fuck what someone thinks in order to recognize >>their outbursts as worthy of derision. > >You obviously care enough to answer. As stupid as you are, you have >to see that much. > Go back under your bridge and mope, twat. -- You are What you do When it counts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 19:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jcmimcdkg688slm7emfeacqp0uk96k9tiv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640537 |
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 16:12:56 -0700, Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >krw@notreal.com wrote: > >>On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 23:19:36 -0700, Fred J. McCall >><fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>krw@notreal.com wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:50:39 +0100, David Mitchell >>>><david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes. Yes I could. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>>>>> >>>>>> Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching >>>>>> Star Trek reruns. >>>>>> >>>>>Bless. It's almost as though you imagine anyone give even the tinest of fucks >>>>>what you think. >>>> >>>>You're reading his posts and answering. Apparently _you_ give at >>>>least the tiniest fuck what he thinks. >>>> >>> >>>One needn't give a fuck what someone thinks in order to recognize >>>their outbursts as worthy of derision. >> >>You obviously care enough to answer. As stupid as you are, you have >>to see that much. >> > >Go back under your bridge and mope, twat. You really don't have to advertise your intelligence. We got it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 09:43 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1oudnUnUnYDTGfXEnZ2dnUU78dfNnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #640399 |
krw@notreal.com wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:50:39 +0100, David Mitchell > <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: > >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>> >>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>> >>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>> >>>> Yes. Yes I could. >>>> >>>> Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>> >>> Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching >>> Star Trek reruns. >>> >> Bless. It's almost as though you imagine anyone give even the tinest of fucks >> what you think. > > You're reading his posts and answering. Apparently _you_ give at > least the tiniest fuck what he thinks. Good point, but since I think he's wrong about everything, it's not really about him, more about the wider points being made.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-13 09:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <_sCdnSJ0HZV36PrEnZ2dnUU7-e3NnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #640134 |
"David Mitchell" wrote in message news:r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk... > >jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>> >>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >> >> Could you be any more vague? > >Yes. Yes I could. > >Things. People will make things. All of the things. I suspect 3D printing at home will be as successful as the personal computer. I mean everyone knows they're useless at home and we'll only need a few major mainframes. Which reminds me, I need to tell my friends who own 3D printers and printing parts to fix things at homes, tools, and tool holders and all manner of things that I never would have thought of myself that they're wrong and no one will effectively use a 3D printer at home. Honestly, it's pretty damn presumptuous to claim that there's no future to 3D printing at home. I suspect 10-20 years from now we'll be laughing at such claims. Like computers, it will continue to improve. It'll get faster, more capable, capable of using more materials, etc. -- Greg D. Moore http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/ CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net IT Disaster Response - https://www.amazon.com/Disaster-Response-Lessons-Learned-Field/dp/1484221834/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-13 17:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nonk3e-pk9.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #640304 |
In sci.physics "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> wrote: > "David Mitchell" wrote in message > news:r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk... >> >>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>> >>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>> >>> Could you be any more vague? >> >>Yes. Yes I could. >> >>Things. People will make things. All of the things. > > I suspect 3D printing at home will be as successful as the personal > computer. I mean everyone knows they're useless at home and we'll only need > a few major mainframes. Personal computer use in the home is dropping with increased use of smart phones for those important tasks such as posting on twitter and facebook. > Which reminds me, I need to tell my friends who own 3D printers and printing > parts to fix things at homes, tools, and tool holders and all manner of > things that I never would have thought of myself that they're wrong and no > one will effectively use a 3D printer at home. How many people do you know that own 3D printers? I know about a dozen people that own things like welders, milling machines, drill presses, and lathes but no one that owns a 3D printer. > Honestly, it's pretty damn presumptuous to claim that there's no future to > 3D printing at home. I suspect 10-20 years from now we'll be laughing at > such claims. Like computers, it will continue to improve. It'll get faster, > more capable, capable of using more materials, etc. Since no one in this thread has made that claim, your post is nonsense. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-13 21:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <m46gmctkr0dvftpf74l7k193pm7pfic8g2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640330 |
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:37:59 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> wrote: >> "David Mitchell" wrote in message >> news:r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk... >>> >>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>> >>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>> >>>> Could you be any more vague? >>> >>>Yes. Yes I could. >>> >>>Things. People will make things. All of the things. >> >> I suspect 3D printing at home will be as successful as the personal >> computer. I mean everyone knows they're useless at home and we'll only need >> a few major mainframes. > >Personal computer use in the home is dropping with increased use of smart >phones for those important tasks such as posting on twitter and facebook. Banking and Amazon, too. Though that isn't to say that there isn't anything beyond the 3D printer. > >> Which reminds me, I need to tell my friends who own 3D printers and printing >> parts to fix things at homes, tools, and tool holders and all manner of >> things that I never would have thought of myself that they're wrong and no >> one will effectively use a 3D printer at home. > >How many people do you know that own 3D printers? I know of none but we have several at work. One of my cow-orkers was going to buy one and use it as a side business but he figured out that it made no business sense. >I know about a dozen people that own things like welders, milling machines, >drill presses, and lathes but no one that owns a 3D printer. > >> Honestly, it's pretty damn presumptuous to claim that there's no future to >> 3D printing at home. I suspect 10-20 years from now we'll be laughing at >> such claims. Like computers, it will continue to improve. It'll get faster, >> more capable, capable of using more materials, etc. > >Since no one in this thread has made that claim, your post is nonsense. +1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 02:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <39ml3e-bmc.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #640401 |
In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:37:59 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> wrote: >>> "David Mitchell" wrote in message >>> news:r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk... >>>> >>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>> >>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>> >>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>> >>>>Yes. Yes I could. >>>> >>>>Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>> >>> I suspect 3D printing at home will be as successful as the personal >>> computer. I mean everyone knows they're useless at home and we'll only need >>> a few major mainframes. >> >>Personal computer use in the home is dropping with increased use of smart >>phones for those important tasks such as posting on twitter and facebook. > > Banking and Amazon, too. Though that isn't to say that there isn't > anything beyond the 3D printer. Like what, a 4D printer? Of course the ultimate would be a genuine Star Trek replicator: "Computer a 1968 Gibson Les Paul Custom and a cup of Earl Grey, hot." >>> Which reminds me, I need to tell my friends who own 3D printers and printing >>> parts to fix things at homes, tools, and tool holders and all manner of >>> things that I never would have thought of myself that they're wrong and no >>> one will effectively use a 3D printer at home. >> >>How many people do you know that own 3D printers? > > I know of none but we have several at work. One of my cow-orkers was > going to buy one and use it as a side business but he figured out that > it made no business sense. Could that be because custom machine shops have real industrial grade 3D printers? >>I know about a dozen people that own things like welders, milling machines, >>drill presses, and lathes but no one that owns a 3D printer. >> >>> Honestly, it's pretty damn presumptuous to claim that there's no future to >>> 3D printing at home. I suspect 10-20 years from now we'll be laughing at >>> such claims. Like computers, it will continue to improve. It'll get faster, >>> more capable, capable of using more materials, etc. >> >>Since no one in this thread has made that claim, your post is nonsense. > > +1 -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-13 22:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <encgmcpot1hctn6c9ocdem3pktqu8v1rri@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640409 |
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 02:18:43 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >> On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:37:59 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>In sci.physics "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> wrote: >>>> "David Mitchell" wrote in message >>>> news:r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk... >>>>> >>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>>> >>>>>Yes. Yes I could. >>>>> >>>>>Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>>> >>>> I suspect 3D printing at home will be as successful as the personal >>>> computer. I mean everyone knows they're useless at home and we'll only need >>>> a few major mainframes. >>> >>>Personal computer use in the home is dropping with increased use of smart >>>phones for those important tasks such as posting on twitter and facebook. >> >> Banking and Amazon, too. Though that isn't to say that there isn't >> anything beyond the 3D printer. > >Like what, a 4D printer? > >Of course the ultimate would be a genuine Star Trek replicator: > >"Computer a 1968 Gibson Les Paul Custom and a cup of Earl Grey, hot." > >>>> Which reminds me, I need to tell my friends who own 3D printers and printing >>>> parts to fix things at homes, tools, and tool holders and all manner of >>>> things that I never would have thought of myself that they're wrong and no >>>> one will effectively use a 3D printer at home. >>> >>>How many people do you know that own 3D printers? >> >> I know of none but we have several at work. One of my cow-orkers was >> going to buy one and use it as a side business but he figured out that >> it made no business sense. > >Could that be because custom machine shops have real industrial grade >3D printers? So you think that after everyone has a 3D printer, the world will end? Are you some sort of 3D Rastafarian, or something? >>>I know about a dozen people that own things like welders, milling machines, >>>drill presses, and lathes but no one that owns a 3D printer. >>> >>>> Honestly, it's pretty damn presumptuous to claim that there's no future to >>>> 3D printing at home. I suspect 10-20 years from now we'll be laughing at >>>> such claims. Like computers, it will continue to improve. It'll get faster, >>>> more capable, capable of using more materials, etc. >>> >>>Since no one in this thread has made that claim, your post is nonsense. >> >> +1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 17 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web