Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #516300 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-23 23:42 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-26 19:27 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 73 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 23:42 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:12 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:21 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:06 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 13:28 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:45 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 17:54 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:41 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 11:05 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 20:53 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 15:51 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:33 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 07:47 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 08:34 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 09:55 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 09:36 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 11:00 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 15:43 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 16:52 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 14:14 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:00 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:12 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 21:24 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:52 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:15 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:19 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 23:52 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-27 04:12 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:04 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 13:11 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 09:25 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:05 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 12:45 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:04 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-28 11:30 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:39 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-28 23:16 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-26 18:29 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:29 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-27 09:48 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (NORAD lied) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 09:19 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (NORAD lied) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 10:34 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 16:26 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:40 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 04:47 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:01 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:08 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:27 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-27 10:00 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:13 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:12 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 16:26 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:22 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:42 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 14:54 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 17:04 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 15:13 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 23:05 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 23:52 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:51 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:11 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 08:55 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 19:02 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:58 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 23:53 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 22:06 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-29 08:49 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:05 +0100
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 22:29 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 16:42 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 05:43 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:10 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:27 +0200
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 09:19 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (NORAD lied) |
| Message-ID | <kLOdnXw4q5kCgULInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517125 |
"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message news:MPG.304807e829a9df6f98c24b@news.giganews.com... > In article <mrlccm$ler$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... >>> >> When special closed circuit camera's at the pentagon only were able to >> catch >> a blur between frames. >> (and we are supposed to believe that blur was a whole plane) > > Lots of people saw the "whole plane", kOOk. BKD you spelled "Crisis Actors" wrong you clown. BTW so far I've caught the EPA, NIST, the NNSA and the USGS lying about 9/11/01 events and I can add NORAD to the list too now. See: Senator Dayton: NORAD Lied About 9/11 http://www.911truth.org/senator-dayton-norad-lied-about-911/ Not just NORAD but the FAA too. See: New book by 9/11 commission co-chairman Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton Indicate lies by the FAA, NORAD and the Pentagon http://911review.org/Media/CNN_FAA_NORAD_DOD_LIED.html Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 10:34 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (NORAD lied) |
| Message-ID | <mrnanb$qde$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517195 |
On 8/27/2015 9:19 AM, Rocky wrote: > > > Rocky > > real cause of collapse by this; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocky_the_Flying_Squirrel#/media/File:Rocky_the_flying_squirrel.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 16:26 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) |
| Message-ID | <d4ednWkQ7tXST33InZ2dnUU7-WmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517034 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:iu71bc-7ci.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> I've never seen any evidence of a 757 ramming the Pentagon and I even >> heard >> Flight 93 landed safely before they started a bullshit story about that >> Flight crashing at Pranksville. > > You could try talking to one of the many eyewitnesses that saw the > airline's markings on the aircraft and the passengers looking out > the windows, kook. You spelled liewitnesses wrong you clown. And don't forget that the #1 Pentagon Witness claimed he even saw the wings of the alleged Flight 77 fold it's wings back even though no 757 has been able to do that. <G> Go to about 2:01 in the following video: 9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness Mike Walter https://youtu.be/f0vxc50xAbk And if you look at the games the military was playing on 9/11 one of them was a game that used bogus blips on the radar so now we know the truth about the alleged Flight 77. Or for more about what really crashed at the Pentagon see. Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015) (time indexed to start at 24:45) https://youtu.be/VXBk8JqwFlw?t=24m45s Rocky.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 21:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) |
| Message-ID | <3417bc-9f8.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517519 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > And don't forget that the #1 Pentagon Witness claimed he even saw the wings > of the alleged Flight 77 fold it's wings back even though no 757 has been > able to do that. <G> Go to about 2:01 in the following video: "the #1 Pentagon Witness"?? You really are a delusional, bat shit crazy, kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 04:47 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) |
| Message-ID | <5b1e146eed670a7147704441bada636f@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #517519 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC), in <news:d4ednWkQ7tXST33InZ2dnUU7-WmdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:iu71bc-7ci.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of >> 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC) <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> I've never seen any evidence of a 757 ramming the Pentagon and I even >>> heard Flight 93 landed safely before they started a bullshit story >>> about that Flight crashing at Pranksville. >> You could try talking to one of the many eyewitnesses that saw the >> airline's markings on the aircraft and the passengers looking out >> the windows, kook. > You spelled liewitnesses wrong you clown. > > And don't forget that the #1 Pentagon Witness claimed he even saw the wings > of the alleged Flight 77 fold it's wings back even though no 757 has been > able to do that. <G> Go to about 2:01 in the following video: > > 9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness Mike Walter > https://youtu.be/f0vxc50xAbk That video proves you wrong, Mike. Which means it proves you're lying, Mike. Did you even bother to watch the entirety of that video prior to using it as "evidence", Mike? I bet not. Kook. LOL > And if you look at the games the military was playing on 9/11 one of them > was a game that used bogus blips on the radar so now we know the truth about > the alleged Flight 77. For your reference, ASR-11 has an average power of 2.1 kW, and can only see out to ~60 miles line-of-sight. To project across the entire US to affect all radar towers would take multiple megawatts of transmitting power. So there's the first impossible hurdle to "false blips". The secondary system receives flight data from aircraft transponders. If they were going to inject "false blips", they'd first have to match the pulse compression for each receiving radar tower (which automatically changes with varying weather conditions to improve SNR and thus would be impossible to match using a single transmitting source), so they'd have to have multiple signal sources at the correct altitude, location, speed and pulse compression. So there's the second, third, fourth and fifth impossible hurdles to "false blips". Otherwise, the "false blips" would be detected as clutter and Doppler filtered out. The very best the military could hope to do is jam the radar, which would just snow the screen, effectively blinding the airport radar... it'd detect nothing. Do you even know how radar works, Mike? <http://www.911myths.com/index.php/False_blips> "Conclusion As we've seen, there are some 9/11 researchers who state definitively that there were "false blips" on FAA radar screens. And yet, take a closer look and you find there's absolutely no evidence to support this. It's just another example of empty speculation being presented as fact, and another reason why you should be careful to verify 9/11 claims before accepting them as true." IOW, you're just a paranoid-delusional schizophrenic off his meds, Michael Scott Guthrie. Take your meds, Mike. Kook. LOL > Or for more about what really crashed at the Pentagon<SMACKAKOOK!> American Airlines Flight 77 crashed at the Pentagon. That has been proven. You're just a paranoid-delusional schizophrenic off his meds. Take your meds, Michael Scott Guthrie. Kook. LOL > Rocky. Now, get to addressing the 19 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL 18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words "with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" (MID: <43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com>). 19) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Mike. Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 19 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- ------------------------------------ Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky) 336-643-6611 6913 Maynard Road Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother Paula S. Guthrie, given that you're in your 30's and you still live at home with mommy... and Grandma Martha. LOL Your brother Scott certainly won't be happy to know you're embarrassing the Guthrie family name, how's he gonna find real estate clients if everyone knows the Guthries are a pack of schizo kooks? LOL Just how many backwoods redneck hillbillies can fit in one small 1200 sf 3bd/1.5 ba house?! Does RockyRetard share a bedroom with his brother? Or do they make Grandma Martha sleep on the porch? LOL ------------------------------------ Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Mike. IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 13:01 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) |
| Message-ID | <rhmDx.3313$tw.3214@fx02.iad> |
| In reply to | #517002 |
On 08/26/2015 10:36 AM, Rocky wrote:
> ""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
> (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
> 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
> news:op.x3zaa6f8tm21m2@benson.localhost...
>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:34:29 -0400, Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> ""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
>>> (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
>>> 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
>>> news:op.x3y4czg9tm21m2@benson.localhost...
>>>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:33:24 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>>> are you intentionally this fucking stupid?
>>>
>>> Talk about the Friendly Neighborhood Nut being stupid. He thinks WCBS in
>>> Nuke York City uses satellite to get from the helicopter to the station.
>>>
>>> And he never figured out that if the station had a directional AM antenna
>>> and it was aimed at the North Tower that would explain why they picked
>>> up so
>>> many EMPs and none of the other major networks did.
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>>
>>
>> you are at least 10 times as stupid as fakeyTurd displays here and you're
>> not even pretending to be stupid.
>>
>> you are an example of what happens when someone unquestioningly believes
>> EVERYTHING they read on the internet.
>
> WHAT THE FCUK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT???
>
> I've never seen any evidence of a 757 ramming the Pentagon and I even heard
> Flight 93 landed safely before they started a bullshit story about that
> Flight crashing at Pranksville.
>
> I was even in the LA area when there was a great big fire that burned for
> hours in the First Interstate Bank Building.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Interstate_Tower_fire
>
> I even went down there in the morning while the ground was still wet from
> all the water and that building remained standing the entire time so why
> didn't the Twin Towers keep standing? And don't give me bullshit from NIST
> because they have been proven to be liars. <G>
>
> So because I knew we were fed bullshit about Flight 77 and Flight 93 and
> I've seen high rise buildings survive big fires I knew we were not told the
> entire story about the Twin Towers and it just so happens one person showed
> the details that the news left out that only NCDs could do.
>
> Rocky
Rocky, don't you know governments never lie! Well or if they do one can
easily tell if they are by simply asking HVAC or ODDball. There is only
ONE way to know what is true. And that is to believe EVERYTHING HVAC and
Boinker tell you with all your heart.
Rocko, I don't think it's too late for you to still love Big Brother!
"Explosion has two forces inner and outward. Inner creates matter outer
energy. There can be no life without the inner force of
compression.There would be no light without the explosion force of
photons."
HVAC pretending to know science. HVAC is insane.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 19:08 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) |
| Message-ID | <a76ab231b6bd83e8a5be153ea7fdd952@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516992 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC), in <news:bIqdnZ1XQ-gIXUDInZ2dnUU7-XmdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of > 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as ><root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:op.x3y4czg9tm21m2@benson.localhost... >> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:33:24 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> are you intentionally this fucking stupid? Says the guy who's admitted he's "really stupid" (your words). LOL > Talk about the Friendly Neighborhood Nut being stupid. He thinks WCBS in > Nuke York City uses satellite to get from the helicopter to the station. And what alternative would they use, you brain-dead fuckwit? Run a CAT6 cable along behind the helicopter so they can hook up to the internet? Run microwave, which is line of sight and thus would necessitate reorienting the microwave antenna whenever the helicopter moved, and certainly wouldn't work if they flew past a building that interrupted their line of sight to the receiving antenna? Satellite phone? Which has a grainy picture due to low bandwidth? They transmit from an omnidirectional antenna to a VHF mobile receiver on the ground, which relays it to satellite... because helicopters until recently had problems transmitting to satellite directly due to blade interference. Sort of like this: <http://cyclingtipscontent.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/HF-Complex-Long-Distance-System.jpg> Fuck, you are about the stupidest person ever, Mike. Kook. LOL > And he never figured out that if the station had a directional AM antenna Bwahahahaaa! A "directional AM antenna" on a moving helicopter, which would have to be reoriented whenever the helicopter moved, and which would lose signal every time it went behind a building? You're retarded and delusional. Take your meds, Mike. Kook. LOL > and it was aimed at the North Tower that would explain why they picked up so > many EMPs and none of the other major networks did. NO EMPs were ever "picked up", you delusional retard. A nuke EMP would have knocked that fucking helicopter out of the sky. It would have fried all cameras in a radius of dozens of miles. There would be no video of the collapses nor the immediate aftermath. Each video you provide of the collapses and the immediate aftermath proves your own kooky conspiracy theory wrong. IOW, you're delusional and off your meds. Take your meds, Mike. > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 18 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL 18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words "with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" (MID: <43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com>). Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 18 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- ------------------------------------ Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky) 336-643-6611 6913 Maynard Road Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother Paula S. Guthrie, given that you're in your 30's and you still live at home with mommy... and Grandma Martha. LOL Your brother Scott certainly won't be happy to know you're embarrassing the Guthrie family name, how's he gonna find real estate clients if everyone knows the Guthries are a pack of schizo kooks? LOL Just how many backwoods redneck hillbillies can fit in one small 1200 sf 3bd/1.5 ba house?! Does RockyRetard share a bedroom with his brother? Or do they make Grandma Martha sleep on the porch? LOL ------------------------------------ Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 04:27 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) |
| Message-ID | <mvlttal454sjru872q3r9cnf9sbg9a9rtg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516992 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:34:29 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
>(aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
>15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
>news:op.x3y4czg9tm21m2@benson.localhost...
>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:33:24 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> are you intentionally this fucking stupid?
>
>Talk about the Friendly Neighborhood Nut being stupid. He thinks WCBS in
>Nuke York City uses satellite to get from the helicopter to the station.
>
>And he never figured out that if the station had a directional AM antenna
>and it was aimed at the North Tower that would explain why they picked up so
>many EMPs and none of the other major networks did.
>
No EMPs were present. This has been proved many times.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 10:00 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-7AFFCE.10002027082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #517170 |
> >And he never figured out that if the station had a directional AM antenna > >and it was aimed at the North Tower that would explain why they picked up so > >many EMPs and none of the other major networks did. Do television stations really use AM for private communication? -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 17:13 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) |
| Message-ID | <33t3bc-p8r.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517218 |
In sci.physics je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >> >And he never figured out that if the station had a directional AM antenna >> >and it was aimed at the North Tower that would explain why they picked up so >> >many EMPs and none of the other major networks did. > > Do television stations really use AM for private communication? Nope; about the only form of communications that still uses AM is aircraft. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 16:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) |
| Message-ID | <MKmdndzPQoH14ELInZ2dnUU7-c-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517218 |
"je suis charly" <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote in message news:charlie-gordon1492-7AFFCE.10002027082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu... >> >And he never figured out that if the station had a directional AM >> >antenna >> >and it was aimed at the North Tower that would explain why they picked >> >up so >> >many EMPs and none of the other major networks did. > > Do television stations really use AM for private communication? You just aren't thinking because if WCBS was using FM there is no way they could have recorded the EMP at the exact same time the ground below the North Tower shook the North Tower like a tuning fork. 9/11 WTC North Tower collapse by Etienne Sauret. Visible shaking 12 seconds before collapse https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CM88xJX5FsA Nuclear destruction of the WTC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 16:26 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) |
| Message-ID | <mrnva9$dn9$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517286 |
On 8/27/2015 4:12 PM, Rocky wrote: > "je suis charly" <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote in message > > 9/11 WTC North Tower collapse by Etienne Sauret. Visible shaking 12 seconds > before collapse > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CM88xJX5FsA no earthquack at all. have you ever watched it ? > > Nuclear destruction of the WTC > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FuckwadNGWsjj_Y > No Radiation detected, Dude ! > Rocky, the lying Squirrelly > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 21:22 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) |
| Message-ID | <rlb4bc-0ss.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517286 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > You just aren't thinking because if WCBS was using FM there is no way they > could have recorded the EMP at the exact same time the ground below the > North Tower shook the North Tower like a tuning fork. Nobody recorded and EMP and no service other than aircraft has used AM for communications for about a half century now, you raving, luantic, kook. If there had been an EMP from even one nuclear explosion, all most all of the electronics in the immediate area would have been toast, kook. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 16:42 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) |
| Message-ID | <Ms6dnaXcRpn3GULInZ2dnUU7-bGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517286 |
"je suis charly" <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote in message news:charlie-gordon1492-314EED.14284127082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu... > In article <MKmdndzPQoH14ELInZ2dnUU7-c-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> "je suis charly" <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote in message >> news:charlie-gordon1492-7AFFCE.10002027082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu... >> >> >And he never figured out that if the station had a directional AM >> >> >antenna >> >> >and it was aimed at the North Tower that would explain why they >> >> >picked >> >> >up so >> >> >many EMPs and none of the other major networks did. >> > >> > Do television stations really use AM for private communication? >> >> You just aren't thinking because if WCBS was using FM there is no way >> they >> could have recorded the EMP at the exact same time the ground below the > > Actually I am thinking if you cannot get something this simple straight, > why > would I believe you cannot get anything more complicated, like your zipper > fly, > straight. That is the way I feel about what NIST stated about WTC7. Since the NIST report about the Twin Towers was filled with complete and udder bullshit why should I believe what NIST wrote about WTC7? See: Playlist for the Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 14:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) |
| Message-ID | <8nkm7k.b0k.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #517301 |
Rocky wrote: > "je suis charly" <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote in message > news:charlie-gordon1492-314EED.14284127082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu... >> In article <MKmdndzPQoH14ELInZ2dnUU7-c-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> "je suis charly" <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote in message >>> news:charlie-gordon1492-7AFFCE.10002027082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu... >>>>>> And he never figured out that if the station had a directional AM >>>>>> antenna >>>>>> and it was aimed at the North Tower that would explain why they >>>>>> picked >>>>>> up so >>>>>> many EMPs and none of the other major networks did. >>>> >>>> Do television stations really use AM for private communication? >>> >>> You just aren't thinking because if WCBS was using FM there is no >>> way they >>> could have recorded the EMP at the exact same time the ground below >>> the >> >> Actually I am thinking if you cannot get something this simple >> straight, why >> would I believe you cannot get anything more complicated, like your >> zipper fly, >> straight. > > That is the way I feel about what NIST stated about WTC7. > > Since the NIST report about the Twin Towers was filled with complete > and udder bullshit why should I believe what NIST wrote about WTC7? See: > > Playlist for the Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W why should anyone care what you believe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 17:04 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) |
| Message-ID | <nO2dndrCSJcuFELInZ2dnUU7-WWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517306 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8nkm7k.b0k.19.1@news.alt.net... > Rocky wrote: >> "je suis charly" <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote in message >> news:charlie-gordon1492-314EED.14284127082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu... >>> In article <MKmdndzPQoH14ELInZ2dnUU7-c-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> "je suis charly" <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote in message >>>> news:charlie-gordon1492-7AFFCE.10002027082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu... >>>>>>> And he never figured out that if the station had a directional AM >>>>>>> antenna >>>>>>> and it was aimed at the North Tower that would explain why they >>>>>>> picked >>>>>>> up so >>>>>>> many EMPs and none of the other major networks did. >>>>> >>>>> Do television stations really use AM for private communication? >>>> >>>> You just aren't thinking because if WCBS was using FM there is no >>>> way they >>>> could have recorded the EMP at the exact same time the ground below >>>> the >>> >>> Actually I am thinking if you cannot get something this simple >>> straight, why >>> would I believe you cannot get anything more complicated, like your >>> zipper fly, >>> straight. >> >> That is the way I feel about what NIST stated about WTC7. >> >> Since the NIST report about the Twin Towers was filled with complete >> and udder bullshit why should I believe what NIST wrote about WTC7? See: >> >> Playlist for the Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W > > why should anyone care what you believe Because the war against terror is bogus. The real "terrorist" are the ones that flew CGIs into the Twin Towers, used nukes to vaporize them and then paid NIST millions and millions of dollars for them to come up with total bullshit about what made the Twin Towers race a rock to the ground. The facts prove the FAA lied, NORAD lied, the EPA lied, the NNSA lied. USGS lied and as I just stated NIST lied and not just lied but they lied BIG TIME as proven by the videos in the link right above your reply. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 15:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) |
| Message-ID | <8nknbg.hhe.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #517314 |
Rocky wrote: > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8nkm7k.b0k.19.1@news.alt.net... >> Rocky wrote: >>> "je suis charly" <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote in message >>> news:charlie-gordon1492-314EED.14284127082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu... >>>> In article <MKmdndzPQoH14ELInZ2dnUU7-c-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> "je suis charly" <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote in message >>>>> news:charlie-gordon1492-7AFFCE.10002027082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu... >>>>>>>> And he never figured out that if the station had a directional >>>>>>>> AM antenna >>>>>>>> and it was aimed at the North Tower that would explain why they >>>>>>>> picked >>>>>>>> up so >>>>>>>> many EMPs and none of the other major networks did. >>>>>> >>>>>> Do television stations really use AM for private communication? >>>>> >>>>> You just aren't thinking because if WCBS was using FM there is no >>>>> way they >>>>> could have recorded the EMP at the exact same time the ground >>>>> below the >>>> >>>> Actually I am thinking if you cannot get something this simple >>>> straight, why >>>> would I believe you cannot get anything more complicated, like your >>>> zipper fly, >>>> straight. >>> >>> That is the way I feel about what NIST stated about WTC7. >>> >>> Since the NIST report about the Twin Towers was filled with complete >>> and udder bullshit why should I believe what NIST wrote about WTC7? >>> See: Playlist for the Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W >> >> why should anyone care what you believe > > Because the war against terror is bogus. > > The real "terrorist" are the ones that flew CGIs into the Twin > Towers, used nukes to vaporize them and then paid NIST millions and > millions of > dollars for them to come up with total bullshit about what made the Twin > Towers race a rock to the ground. > > The facts prove the FAA lied, NORAD lied, the EPA lied, the NNSA > lied. USGS lied and as I just stated NIST lied and not just lied but they > lied > BIG TIME as proven by the videos in the link right above your reply. > > Rocky who cares
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 23:05 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) |
| Message-ID | <omh4bc-s6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517314 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Because the war against terror is bogus. You really are quite insane, you raving kook. <snip remaining insane ravings> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 23:52 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) |
| Message-ID | <mropdv$3fp$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517314 |
On 8/27/2015 5:04 PM, Rocky wrote: >>> Playlist for the Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: >>> https://www.BIGBOOBIES.com/watch?v=zvCuMUdLutddHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W >> >> why should anyone care what you believe > > Because the war against terror is bogus. that is your opinion. > > The real "terrorist" are the ones that flew CGIs into the Twin Towers, used > nukes to vaporize them and then paid NIST millions and millions of dollars > for them to come up with total bullshit about what made the Twin Towers race > a rock to the ground. everyone saw the terrorists fly airplanes into the buildings. So what ? <snip crap> > Rocky > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 21:51 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) |
| Message-ID | <fbd4bc-i1t.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517301 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Since the NIST report about the Twin Towers was filled with complete and > udder bullshit why should I believe what NIST wrote about WTC7? See: Translation: the NIST used big words, sience, math and engineering in the report and Rocky is too ignorant and stupid to understand any of it. Perhaps if the NIST would put together a dumbed down video targeted for third graders and put it on Youtube, Rocky could understand it. <snip remaining insane idiot ravings> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web