Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #586167 > unrolled thread

Fracking

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-22 10:31 -0500
    Re: Fracking Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 10:44 -0500
      Re: Fracking john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 10:00 -0700
        Re: Fracking Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 12:43 -0500
        Re: Fracking moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-22 17:55 +0000
      Re: Fracking john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 10:07 -0700
        Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-22 12:21 -0500
          Re: Fracking john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 10:39 -0700
            Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-22 12:47 -0500
              Re: Fracking john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 10:52 -0700
                Re: Fracking Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 13:38 -0500
          Re: Fracking Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 12:53 -0500
          Re: Fracking HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 17:39 -0700
            Re: Fracking john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 18:32 -0700
              Re: Fracking Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 09:42 -0500
            Re: Fracking "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-06-22 19:35 -0700
            Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-23 01:06 -0500
        Re: Fracking Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 12:44 -0500
      Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-22 12:12 -0500
        Re: Fracking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-22 17:38 +0000
          Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-22 13:00 -0500
            Re: Fracking john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 11:13 -0700
              Re: Fracking Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 14:04 -0500
            Re: Fracking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-22 18:29 +0000
              Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-22 13:57 -0500
                Re: Fracking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-22 21:10 +0000
                  Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-23 00:28 -0500
                    Re: Fracking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-23 05:55 +0000
                      Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-23 11:06 -0500
                        Re: Fracking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-23 18:00 +0000
                          Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-23 18:18 -0500
                            Re: Fracking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-23 23:56 +0000
                              Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-24 11:18 -0500
                                Re: Fracking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-24 17:09 +0000
                                  Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-25 10:47 -0500
                                    Re: Fracking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-25 16:41 +0000
                                      Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-25 12:46 -0500
                                        Re: Fracking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-25 19:58 +0000
                              Re: Fracking john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-24 03:13 -0700
                Re: Fracking "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 15:45 -0700
                  Re: Fracking john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 16:01 -0700
                    Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-23 01:01 -0500
                      Re: Fracking Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 09:54 -0500
                        Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-23 11:10 -0500
                          Re: Fracking Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 11:24 -0500
                            Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-23 12:07 -0500
                              Re: Fracking Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 13:03 -0500
                  Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-23 00:21 -0500
                    Re: Fracking Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 12:22 -0500
                      Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-23 16:46 -0500
                    Re: Fracking "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 16:39 -0700
                      Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-25 12:41 -0500
        Re: Fracking Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 12:51 -0500
          Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-22 13:23 -0500
            Re: Fracking Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 14:02 -0500
              Re: Fracking ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-22 14:24 -0500
                Re: Fracking john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 14:38 -0700
                  Re: Fracking Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 16:49 -0500
                    Re: Fracking john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 14:55 -0700
                      Re: Fracking Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 17:03 -0500
                        Re: Fracking john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 15:22 -0700
                          Re: Fracking "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 15:57 -0700
                          Re: Fracking Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 08:59 -0500
                    Re: Fracking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-22 22:22 +0000
        Re: Fracking edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-06-22 18:41 -0700
    Re: Fracking Jerry Kraus <jkraus1999@gmail.com> - 2016-06-24 11:33 -0700
      Re: Fracking noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 16:55 -0700
        Re: Fracking noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 17:01 -0700

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

#586167 — Fracking

What's this "fracking" thing some do and some resent,
and what's bad about it?
--
    "Narrow experience makes for narrow 
     views.
             - Firearm Owner

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#586170

On 6/22/2016 10:31 AM, ClutterFreak wrote:
> What's this "fracking" thing some do and some resent,
> and what's bad about it?
> --
>     "Narrow experience makes for narrow
>      views.
>              - Firearm Owner
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>

It provides additional sources of fossil fuels at the expense of 
damaging watersheds. Competition between two valuable resources.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586176

Whole towns suddenly can light
their water on fire as it comes out
of their taps, and no longer have potable
water.
:(

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586184

On 6/22/2016 12:00 PM, john wrote:
> Whole towns suddenly can light
> their water on fire as it comes out
> of their taps, and no longer have potable
> water.
> :(
>

Uh, what town is that?
The two towns that are the center of the controversy are Pavilion, WY, 
and Dimock, PA. Neither of them have the problem you mention.

More supermarket tabloid fluff, John?

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586192

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Whole towns suddenly can light
>their water on fire as it comes out
>of their taps, and no longer have potable
>water.

Interestingly, I have relatives who live in a town where some people could
light their tap water, long before anyone ever even heard of fracking.  In
fact it is an area where they wanted to do a lot of fracking to get some of 
that gas.

(never happened. I think NY disallowed fracking anywhere in the state.  Also
in that particular town, it appears the gas-bearing strata and the water 
table are much too close to ever allow it)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586177

Clutter
I notice that Odd didn't tell
you to look it up yourself!
Hmm.
Because ur female?
Because ur not me?
At any rate, "It is certainly not in my nature to "enlighten" someone with the results 
of a search anyone can do in 7 seconds. That would be indulging the 
profoundly lazy or the profoundly incompetent, and I have a deep-seated 
antipathy to either kind of indulgence. ",
would seem to be yet another lie.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586180

On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:07:58 -0700 (PDT), john wrote:

> Clutter
> I notice that Odd didn't tell
> you to look it up yourself!
> Hmm.
> Because ur female?
> Because ur not me?
> At any rate, "It is certainly not in my nature to "enlighten" someone with the results 
> of a search anyone can do in 7 seconds. That would be indulging the 
> profoundly lazy or the profoundly incompetent, and I have a deep-seated 
> antipathy to either kind of indulgence. ",
> would seem to be yet another lie.

I hope it was not because I'm male..

The reason I ask the question here is that I want to
take a look at the final words of the debate coming
from a typical victim of such exposures. You can't do
that with googling. You have to spend a lot of time
reading various crap and it is much faster and easier
to ask it here, without imposing too much effort or
time on others. 

And about some subjects (e.g. physics, Iran, ...,
anything that's invaded by parochial activities) you
should never google. It can only give you genuine
looking crap. 
--
    "KIKE Alert!" 
    
                        - Simon Beik

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586183

Whole towns no longer have water.
Oil companies are "fixing" that by
providing bottled water.
But I don't think I'd have a bath
in what comes out of their taps-
I certainly wouldn't smoke while
doing so.
I really don't know how they are
still in business after that.

Also, they pump HUGE amounts of
water down, in order to force out
the gas, which water is then unusable

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586187

On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:39:15 -0700 (PDT), john wrote:

> Whole towns no longer have water.
> Oil companies are "fixing" that by
> providing bottled water.
> But I don't think I'd have a bath
> in what comes out of their taps-
> I certainly wouldn't smoke while
> doing so.
> I really don't know how they are
> still in business after that.
> 
> Also, they pump HUGE amounts of
> water down, in order to force out
> the gas, which water is then unusable

Again, this looks to me an activity that should be
taking place in areas of the world (many such areas
exist) that there's no life. Who let them do that
right in a city's midst? 
--
    "Fervor is the weapon of choice for the 
     impotent."
                          - Frantz Fanon

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586190

Yes
Who let THEM do that?
If someone ruined my entire
life like that, I would be seriously
tempted to go ruin theirs.

Saw it in CBC, Odd.
You don't have news down there- you have
Fox

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586199

On 6/22/2016 12:52 PM, john wrote:
> Yes
> Who let THEM do that?
> If someone ruined my entire
> life like that, I would be seriously
> tempted to go ruin theirs.
>
> Saw it in CBC, Odd.

I'm not looking at TV, John, I'm looking at news reports.
So you don't know the name of the town? Don't remember the TV story that 
clearly?

There's a story about the tiny rural community of Rosebud in Alberta. Is 
that the one you're thinking of?

> You don't have news down there- you have
> Fox
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586191

On 6/22/2016 12:21 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:07:58 -0700 (PDT), john wrote:
>
>> Clutter
>> I notice that Odd didn't tell
>> you to look it up yourself!
>> Hmm.
>> Because ur female?
>> Because ur not me?
>> At any rate, "It is certainly not in my nature to "enlighten" someone with the results
>> of a search anyone can do in 7 seconds. That would be indulging the
>> profoundly lazy or the profoundly incompetent, and I have a deep-seated
>> antipathy to either kind of indulgence. ",
>> would seem to be yet another lie.
>
> I hope it was not because I'm male..
>
> The reason I ask the question here is that I want to
> take a look at the final words of the debate coming
> from a typical victim of such exposures. You can't do
> that with googling. You have to spend a lot of time
> reading various crap and it is much faster and easier
> to ask it here, without imposing too much effort or
> time on others.
>
> And about some subjects (e.g. physics, Iran, ...,
> anything that's invaded by parochial activities) you
> should never google. It can only give you genuine
> looking crap.

And you think that asking here is going to give you better quality 
content than Googling?

The quality you get from Googling depends on how good you are with it. I 
agree that if you know nothing about a subject and aren't very good at 
web searches, what you will likely be faced with is wading through a lot 
of crap.

> --
>     "KIKE Alert!"
>
>                         - Simon Beik
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586252

Custard
On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:07:58 -0700 (PDT), john wrote: 

> Clutter 
> I notice that Odd didn't tell 
> you to look it up yourself! 
> Hmm. 
> Because ur female? 
> Because ur not me? 
> At any rate, "It is certainly not in my nature to "enlighten" someone with the results 
> of a search anyone can do in 7 seconds. That would be indulging the 
> profoundly lazy or the profoundly incompetent, and I have a deep-seated 
> antipathy to either kind of indulgence. ", 
> would seem to be yet another lie. 

I hope it was not because I'm male.. 
------------

I always thought you were female as well. Just the way you act. My bad even tho John thought so too 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586254

Actually, I think it was HVAC calling you
female that misled me, Clutter.
His specialty seems to be misdirection,
as does Odd's.
WHY would anyone argue on the side
of Big Oil and Big Pharma?
California voted to ban fracking, and
the oil company is proposing to sue
them for 1.5B, which is what they claim
they are missing out on.
I say, pull all their licenses, and a class action
suit on behalf of Mother Earth.
Also, put every one of their faces on
Facebook, so they can be shunned forever.

Enemies of Earth. Make them live where
they've ruined the groundwater.

Shut up, Odd. Get another 'nym; go choke
on your lies.
Have a nice day!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586318

On 6/22/2016 8:32 PM, john wrote:
> Actually, I think it was HVAC calling you
> female that misled me, Clutter.
> His specialty seems to be misdirection,
> as does Odd's.
> WHY would anyone argue on the side
> of Big Oil and Big Pharma?

I'm not arguing on the side of Big Oil and Big Pharma.
What I am doing is two things:
- Arguing against frivolous misinformation and false propaganda by those 
who are opposed to Big Oil and Big Pharma -- like you, John. Spewing 
false information does not help your cause, and it only impugns your own 
credibility.
- Making sure that people who point to Evil Corporations own up to their 
own responsibility for the problem by being the consumers of the Evil 
Corporations. Corporations provide solutions according to demand. If a 
car manufacturer can produce an electric car and a fossil fuel car, but 
the electric car is more expensive by $10,000 and people elect to buy 
the fossil fuel car instead, then the responsibility for fossil fuel 
damages is on the consumer, not on the Evil Corporation. This speaks 
directly to you, John, who are a consumer of many of the products you 
claim to despise. Own that.

> California voted to ban fracking, and
> the oil company is proposing to sue
> them for 1.5B, which is what they claim
> they are missing out on.
> I say, pull all their licenses, and a class action
> suit on behalf of Mother Earth.
> Also, put every one of their faces on
> Facebook, so they can be shunned forever.
>
> Enemies of Earth. Make them live where
> they've ruined the groundwater.
>
> Shut up, Odd. Get another 'nym; go choke
> on your lies.
> Have a nice day!!
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586264

Harlow Campbell "HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
Sefton john wrote:
>> Freak Custard, I notice that Odd didn't tell
>> you to look it up yourself!
>> Hmm.
>> Because ur female?
>> Because ur not me?
>> At any rate, "It is certainly not in my nature to "enlighten" someone 
>> with the results
>> of a search anyone can do in 7 seconds. That would be indulging the
>> profoundly lazy or the profoundly incompetent, and I have a deep-seated
>> antipathy to either kind of indulgence. ",
>> would seem to be yet another lie.
>
The Iranian Custard Mehrdrama Maldrecki wrote
> I hope it was not because I'm male..
> ------------
Harlow Campbell wrote:
> I always thought you were female as well.
> Just the way you act. My bad even tho John thought so too>
>
hanson wrote:
Harlow, "ClutterFreak" <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com>
adores the intellect of & worships Full-Swine Bert Glazier.
>
To show that, the freak lays himself UNDER the Sphincter of
Face shitter Jew Glazier "reber g=emc^2", who bragged
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
to have _"PFM"_= "Poop For Maleki", which the gay, Iranian 
Muslime, Mehram Maldrecki, consumed until he turned black
& posted his <http://tinyurl.com/Maleki-Mehram-Selfie>
>
Then the 88 Year old Glazier nnounced that "Glazier is a 
Transvestite who dons female dresses & a Sarah Palin mask, 
saying that he has "nice legs"... which so impressed Maldrecki
that Maleki showed his devotion and solidarity by going LGBT
& had a Sex change operation, whose result she posted in 
<http://tinyurl.com/Maleki-the-TG-Girl>.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586281

On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:39:24 -0700 (PDT), HVAC wrote:

> I always thought you were female as well. Just the way you act. 
> My bad even tho John thought so too

I understand your frustration about being a pussy
compared to me. 
--
    "Woade Hueoo" 
        -extra thick-lipped Black American female 
         intending to say "Walnut Hill"

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586185

On 6/22/2016 12:07 PM, john wrote:
> Clutter
> I notice that Odd didn't tell
> you to look it up yourself!
> Hmm.
> Because ur female?
> Because ur not me?
> At any rate, "It is certainly not in my nature to "enlighten" someone with the results
> of a search anyone can do in 7 seconds. That would be indulging the
> profoundly lazy or the profoundly incompetent, and I have a deep-seated
> antipathy to either kind of indulgence. ",
> would seem to be yet another lie.
>

Well, you're right, John. I could have let him look it up, and I regret 
indulging the profoundly lazy or the profoundly incompetent.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586179

On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:44:36 -0500, Odd Bodkin wrote:

> On 6/22/2016 10:31 AM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>> What's this "fracking" thing some do and some resent,
>> and what's bad about it?
>> --
>>     "Narrow experience makes for narrow
>>      views.
>>              - Firearm Owner
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
> 
> It provides additional sources of fossil fuels at the expense of 
> damaging watersheds. Competition between two valuable resources.
> 

If it works everywhere why don't they do it only in
areas that no people, plants, or animals live?
--
    "tow pAy berah darnaho hich mapors
     khod rAh beguyadat kechon bAyadraft
              
                 - Attar Neyshapuri

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586186

ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@fakeaddress.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:44:36 -0500, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> 
>> On 6/22/2016 10:31 AM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>>> What's this "fracking" thing some do and some resent,
>>> and what's bad about it?
>>> --
>>>     "Narrow experience makes for narrow
>>>      views.
>>>              - Firearm Owner
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>
>> 
>> It provides additional sources of fossil fuels at the expense of 
>> damaging watersheds. Competition between two valuable resources.
>> 
> 
> If it works everywhere why don't they do it only in
> areas that no people, plants, or animals live?

Because it does not work anywhere.

It only works where there are petroleum deposits.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web