Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #616863 > unrolled thread

Apollo 11 Hoax

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Apollo 11 Hoax numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-03 15:26 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 Hoax pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-03 16:47 -0800
      Re: Apollo 11 Hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-03 20:15 -0500
        Re: Apollo 11 Hoax pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-03 17:39 -0800
          Re: Apollo 11 Hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-04 03:39 +0000
            Re: Apollo 11 Hoax pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-03 20:28 -0800
              xaoh No uoY noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 19:11 -0800
                Re: xaoh No uoY noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 21:48 -0800
            Re: Apollo 11 Hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-04 17:22 -0500
              Re: Apollo 11 Hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-04 23:10 +0000
                Re: Apollo 11 Hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-04 18:42 -0500
                  Re: Apollo 11 Hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 00:14 +0000
                Re: Apollo 11 Hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-04 18:51 -0500
                  Re: Apollo 11 Hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 00:15 +0000
                    Re: Apollo 11 Hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-04 20:46 -0500
                      Re: Apollo 11 Hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 03:14 +0000
                        Re: Apollo 11 Hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-06 16:50 -0500
                          Re: Apollo 11 Hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-06 23:49 +0000
                            Re: Apollo 11 Hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-06 19:48 -0500
                              Re: Apollo 11 Hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-07 01:38 +0000
                                Re: Apollo 11 Hoax Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 18:16 -0800
                                  Re: Apollo 11 Hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-07 04:19 +0000
                                    Re: Apollo 11 Hoax Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 04:44 -0800
                                      Re: Apollo 11 Hoax john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 05:41 -0800
                                        Re: Apollo 11 Hoax Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 06:39 -0800
                                          Re: Apollo 11 Hoax "Antonio Hairball" <bleep@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 19:12 -0800
                                      Re: Apollo 11 Hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-07 17:26 +0000
                                        Re: Apollo 11 Hoax Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 09:59 -0800
                                          Re: Apollo 11 Hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 17:03 -0500
                                      Re: Apollo 11 Hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 16:43 -0500
                                        Re: Apollo 11 Hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-07 21:47 +0000
                                          Re: Apollo 11 Hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 20:51 -0500
                                            Re: Apollo 11 Hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-08 03:50 +0000
                                              Re: Apollo 11 Hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-08 16:58 -0500
                                                Re: Apollo 11 Hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-08 22:06 +0000
        Re: Apollo 11 Hoax HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 09:27 -0800
          Re: Apollo 11 Hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 16:59 -0500
    Re: Apollo 11 Hoax numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 12:54 -0800
      Re: Apollo 11 Hoax Yuri Kreton <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-07 08:58 -0600
    Re: Apollo 11 Hoax numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 12:56 -0800
      Re: Apollo 11 Hoax Yuri Kreton <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-07 09:11 -0600
    Re: Apollo 11 Hoax numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-07 15:01 -0800
      Re: Apollo 11 Hoax pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-07 15:14 -0800
      Re: Apollo 11 Hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 21:05 -0500
    Re: Apollo 11 Hoax numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-09 12:53 -0800
      Re: Apollo 11 Hoax noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 19:28 -0800
      Re: Apollo 11 Hoax pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-09 19:41 -0800
        Re: Apollo 11 Hoax noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 19:43 -0800
          Re: Apollo 11 Hoax pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-09 19:48 -0800
            Re: Apollo 11 Hoax noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 20:00 -0800

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#616863 — Apollo 11 Hoax

The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon. A lunar Surveyor 3  test probe was initially sent to the surface of the moon to test the gravity of the moon yet the photograph of the Surveyor 3 lunar probe does not include a blast crater formed by the 1000 lb of thrust produced by the rocket engine that is used to land the Surveyor probe onto the surface of the moon. In addition, the Surveyor photographs show the rover tire tread marks on the surface of the moon which proves the photographs of the Surveyor probe are fake since the surface of the moon lacks an atmosphere required in producing the moisture that forms tire tread marks of the fine particle matter on the surface of the moon. NASA is using Newton's gravity equation to determine the mass earth that is used to determine the mass of the moon using the Barycenter method https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barycenter to calculate the density of the moon which resulted in the moon gravity of .16 g but Newton's gravity equation is physically invalid since like masses do not attract. Cavendish's experiment is used to derive Newton's constant G but Cavendish's experiment is physically invalid. If the moon has the same density of the earth, the moon has a radius of approximately one quarter of the earth's radius which would form a gravity at the surface of the moon of .25 g. NASA's gravity of .16 g at the surface of the moon is based on the moon that has the density of one third the density of the earth yet the moon rocks have similar densities as rocks found on the surface of the earth. The NASA's lunar gravity of .16 g was arbitrarily calculated using Newton's physically invalid gravity equation since Newton's gravity equation is based on Cavendish's experiment that measured experimental force that is 1000 times less than the weight (force) measurement uncertainty in 1797. Nonetheless, the .25 g or .16 g gravities at the surface of the moon would be beyond the fuel capacity of the lunar lander for a successful lunar landing which proves the Apollo missions to the surface of the moon were faked. In the film that depicts the decent of the lunar lander to the surface of the moon, the lunar lander is propagating in the horizontal direction yet the reaction control thrusters are located on the accent stage. A thrust from right control thruster to produce the horizontal motion of the lander would cause the lunar lander to tip down ward and result in the spin of the lunar lander. Also, the varying center of gravity of the lunar lander caused by the reduction of the fuel weight, during the decent, would make the lunar lander propagating in the horizontal direction highly unlikely. In the film of the decent of the lunar lander there is no smoke cloud caused by the primary thruster engine upon landing on the surface of the moon and the roar of the decent primary rocket would be extremely loud (156 db) and not allow for the audio feed that is presented in the Apollo lunar landing decent film. Plus, the close up photographs of the lunar lander's landing pads do not have any lunar particle matter on the landing pads that would be expected after the intense thrust (more than 2000 lbs) of the primary engine disturbing the one half inch deep of fine particle matter on the surface of the moon during the lunar landing. The most important factor in disputing the Apollo lunar landing is that the photographs of the lunar lander do not show a blast crater which would be produced by the more than 2,000 pound thrust of the primary thruster during the decent of the lunar lander onto the surface of the moon. It appears that the lunar lander photographs were staged. Furthermore, the surface of the moon does not contain an atmosphere. Consequently, there is no moisture on the surface of the moon yet the photographs taken on the surface of the moon that represent a one half inch deep astronaut's boot print but to form a boot print of the lunar fine particle matter would require moisture to clump the lunar surface particular matter in the formation of a boot print. Example, when sand is completely dried, the dried sand cannot produce a boot print or a tire tread. Also, in the photographs take on the moon, the shadows appear to be created by more than one light source since the shadows in the lunar surface photographs are in different directions. The ostensible lunar photographs do not include stars since the pattern of the stars would prove that the astronauts were never on the surface of the moon since the extremely intricate and exact pattern of the celestial universe represent a specific time and position that the photograph was taken. Every hour, the pattern of the stellar universe would shift which would be extremely difficult to reproduce if the lunar landing photographs were fakes. No photographs were taken of the stellar universe from the surface of the moon and in an on camera interview with the Apollo astronaut Neil Armstrong, after the Apollo 11 mission, Mr. Armstrong stated that he did not recall the stars of the celestial universe while on the surface of the moon but one of the most spectacular view from the surface of the moon would be the brilliance and clarity of the stars. NASA justifies the absents of star in the Apollo photographs using the explanation that the extremely high intensity of light on the surface of the moon prevents the stars from appearing in the Apollo photographs but all of the Apollo photographs, taken at different times, that include the stellar universe represents the celestial universe as black which would result in the formation of images of stars in the lunar photographs of the Apollo mission yet none of the Apollo photographs show stars. A black celestial universe would result in the formation of illuminating stars in a photograph of the stellar universe. The Apollo ll mission astronauts appear extremely disturbed in the interview when the question regarding the absents of the stars of the celestial universe was asked. Neil Armstrong never gave an on camera interview after his first initial interview that included the question regarding why no stars appear in any of the Apollo photographs. The gravity (.16 g) of the moon is based on Newton's gravity equation that is used to determine the mass of the earth that is subsequently used to calculate the mass of the moon but Newton's gravity equation is physically invalid since Cavendish's experiment is used to determine the value of the constant G of Newton's gravity equation but Cavendish detected a gravitational force of 2 μg which is equivalent to the weight of a single dust particle but the weight measurement uncertainty in 1797 was 1 mg. Cavendish is measuring a force 1,000 times smaller than the weight (force) measurement uncertainty in 1797 which proves Cavendish's experiment, that is used to derive Newton's gravity constant G, is physically invalid. Example, in 2017, if a child said that she was 13 years old but also stated that she was born in 2010 is analogous to measuring a gravitational force of 2 μg that is less than the measurement uncertainty of 1 mg.  In an experiment, a 73 kg lead sphere is suspended using a thin titanium wire and place .3 mm from a larger lead sphere (15,008 kg). A laser is used to detect the change in the angle of the wire that is suspending the 73 kg lead sphere. As the 15,008 kg lead sphere is moved away (d = 1 m) from the smaller suspended lead sphere no measureable change in the angle of the wire that is suspending the 73 kg lead sphere is detected which proves Newton's gravity equation is physically invalid since the described like masses do not attract. The mass of the moon is derived using the mass of the Earth using F = ma and F = G m1m2/r^2; the earth's mass is used to calculate the mass of the moon that is used to determine the gravity at the surface of the moon. Newton's gravity equation that is based on Cavendish's value of G which proves the calculation of the moon's gravity is physically invalid. Furthermore, the total weight of the Apollo 11 lunar lander is 33,083 lbs, using the moon gravity of .16 g the lunar lander weight would be comparable to launching a 5293 lb payload into the earth's orbit; consequently, to descend the lunar lander with a weight of 33,083 lbs to the surface of the moon using a gravity of .16 g would required 26,000 lbs of fuel (fuel + oxidizer) yet the lunar lander decent stage contains two fuel tanks and two oxidizer tanks of approximate volumes of 1,000 gallons each (fig 1 & 2) since the lower half of the lunar lander (decent stage) is approximately the height of an astronaut (fig 2) which represents approximately 1,000 gallons (fig 3) for the approximate volume of each tank which represents a total fuel weight (fuel + oxidizer) of approximately 16,000 lb  that is 10,000 lbs less than the fuel weight  of 26,000 lbs required in the landing.


Figure 1 lander schematics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Lunar_Module#/media/File:LM_illustration_02.jpg


Figure 2 astronaut and lander https://www.google.com/search?q=apollo+11&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjbnKuP0_TRAhVrqVQKHaCFAJ0Q_AUICSgC&biw=1280&bih=907#imgrc=Y0sq5ZZacwCt9M:


Figure 3 water tank  https://www.google.com/search?q=1,000+gallon+water+container&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjei-fD0vTRAhVJxVQKHbhEDl8Q_AUICSgC&biw=1280&bih=907#imgrc=Qo2vtZny17uicM:


Furthermore, the total weight of the lunar lander accent module is 10,300 lb and the fuel weight is 5560 lb but if the moon's gravity is .16 g the weight of the accent module would be comparable to 1648 lbs being launch from the surface of the earth. The TD-2 that has a payload weight of (~1,550 - 2,200 lbs) uses 12,912 lbs of fuel to launch out of the earth's gravity; conversely, for the lunar lander to launch out of the moon's gravity would require approximately 12,000 lbs of fuel but the accent module contains 5560 lb of fuel (fuel + oxidizer) which is 7,000 lbs less fuel than is required to launch the accent module out of the moon's gravity; plus, the accent film does not include of the primary engine burn (flame) or the resulting exhaust.  The combustion of the fuel (aerozine) and oxidizer produces a  visible flame.  Also, how is the accent film of the lunar accent module launch obtained since the launch film was taken on the surface of the moon, during the launch. In memorie of Thomas Ronald Baron and family. 
.



.






.
 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#616873

On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 3:26:22 PM UTC-8, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:

> The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon...

You never read the links, did you? All these questions are explained.

You CAN read, correct?

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616881

On 2/3/2017 7:47 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 3:26:22 PM UTC-8, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon...
>
> You never read the links, did you? All these questions are explained.
>
> You CAN read, correct?
>
> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
>
> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html

Typical debunker bullshit. Everybody knows that if you want to know if 
moon landing was a hoax, the way to do the science is the way one always 
does science...You take a democratic vote. only 6% of the people say 
moon landing was a hoax just like 96% of scientists say that global 
warming is man caused. That is all the scientific proof anyone needs. 
And if you still harbor any doubts simply ask HVAC. No higher science 
authority exists. Done.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616890

On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:15:59 PM UTC-8, benj wrote:
> On 2/3/2017 7:47 PM, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:

> > On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 3:26:22 PM UTC-8, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon...
> >
> > You never read the links, did you? All these questions are explained.
> >
> > You CAN read, correct?
> >
> > http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
> >
> > http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
> 
> Typical debunker bullshit. Everybody knows that if you want to know if 
> moon landing was a hoax, the way to do the science is the way one always 
> does science...You take a democratic vote. only 6% of the people say 
> moon landing was a hoax just like 96% of scientists say that global 
> warming is man caused. That is all the scientific proof anyone needs. 
> And if you still harbor any doubts simply ask HVAC. No higher science 
> authority exists. Done.

Typical crank response. Anyone with half a brain knows that consensus is illegitimate as an argument. 

Do you, too, Benj, claim that the moon landings were faked? 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616903

pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:15:59 PM UTC-8, benj wrote:
>> On 2/3/2017 7:47 PM, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
>> > On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 3:26:22 PM UTC-8, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >
>> >> The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon...
>> >
>> > You never read the links, did you? All these questions are explained.
>> >
>> > You CAN read, correct?
>> >
>> > http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
>> >
>> > http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
>> 
>> Typical debunker bullshit. Everybody knows that if you want to know if 
>> moon landing was a hoax, the way to do the science is the way one always 
>> does science...You take a democratic vote. only 6% of the people say 
>> moon landing was a hoax just like 96% of scientists say that global 
>> warming is man caused. That is all the scientific proof anyone needs. 
>> And if you still harbor any doubts simply ask HVAC. No higher science 
>> authority exists. Done.
> 
> Typical crank response. Anyone with half a brain knows that consensus is illegitimate as an argument. 
> 
> Do you, too, Benj, claim that the moon landings were faked? 

Does it really matter what an admitted lier and troll has to say
about anything?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616905

On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 8:01:09 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:15:59 PM UTC-8, benj wrote:
> >> On 2/3/2017 7:47 PM, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> >> > On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 3:26:22 PM UTC-8, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon...
> >> >
> >> > You never read the links, did you? All these questions are explained.
> >> >
> >> > You CAN read, correct?
> >> >
> >> > http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
> >> >
> >> > http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
> >> 
> >> Typical debunker bullshit. Everybody knows that if you want to know if 
> >> moon landing was a hoax, the way to do the science is the way one always 
> >> does science...You take a democratic vote. only 6% of the people say 
> >> moon landing was a hoax just like 96% of scientists say that global 
> >> warming is man caused. That is all the scientific proof anyone needs. 
> >> And if you still harbor any doubts simply ask HVAC. No higher science 
> >> authority exists. Done.
> > 
> > Typical crank response. Anyone with half a brain knows that consensus is illegitimate as an argument. 
> > 
> > Do you, too, Benj, claim that the moon landings were faked? 
> 
> Does it really matter what an admitted lier and troll has to say
> about anything?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jim Pennino

No, no really...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617497 — xaoh No uoY

he's The hammer or\and eagle-feather;
who weighs moreso

> > Does it really matter what an admitted lier and troll has to say
> > about anything?
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jim Pennino
> 
> No, no really...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617700 — Re: xaoh No uoY

personal best, 8 of those quanta

> he's The hammer or\and eagle-feather;
> who weighs moreso

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616968

On 2/3/2017 10:39 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:15:59 PM UTC-8, benj wrote:
>>> On 2/3/2017 7:47 PM, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 3:26:22 PM UTC-8, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon...
>>>>
>>>> You never read the links, did you? All these questions are explained.
>>>>
>>>> You CAN read, correct?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
>>>>
>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
>>>
>>> Typical debunker bullshit. Everybody knows that if you want to know if
>>> moon landing was a hoax, the way to do the science is the way one always
>>> does science...You take a democratic vote. only 6% of the people say
>>> moon landing was a hoax just like 96% of scientists say that global
>>> warming is man caused. That is all the scientific proof anyone needs.
>>> And if you still harbor any doubts simply ask HVAC. No higher science
>>> authority exists. Done.
>>
>> Typical crank response. Anyone with half a brain knows that consensus is illegitimate as an argument.
>>
>> Do you, too, Benj, claim that the moon landings were faked?
>
> Does it really matter what an admitted lier and troll has to say
> about anything?

"Lier"?  I see Chimp is still showing his lack of education and 
intelligence in a public world wide forum. It has already been proven 
that John and Bert know more science than he does. He thinks ice is a 
"hoax"! Wattya gonna learn from him?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616992

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 2/3/2017 10:39 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:15:59 PM UTC-8, benj wrote:
>>>> On 2/3/2017 7:47 PM, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 3:26:22 PM UTC-8, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon...
>>>>>
>>>>> You never read the links, did you? All these questions are explained.
>>>>>
>>>>> You CAN read, correct?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
>>>>
>>>> Typical debunker bullshit. Everybody knows that if you want to know if
>>>> moon landing was a hoax, the way to do the science is the way one always
>>>> does science...You take a democratic vote. only 6% of the people say
>>>> moon landing was a hoax just like 96% of scientists say that global
>>>> warming is man caused. That is all the scientific proof anyone needs.
>>>> And if you still harbor any doubts simply ask HVAC. No higher science
>>>> authority exists. Done.
>>>
>>> Typical crank response. Anyone with half a brain knows that consensus is illegitimate as an argument.
>>>
>>> Do you, too, Benj, claim that the moon landings were faked?
>>
>> Does it really matter what an admitted lier and troll has to say
>> about anything?
> 
> "Lier"?  I see Chimp is still showing his lack of education and 
> intelligence in a public world wide forum. It has already been proven 
> that John and Bert know more science than he does. He thinks ice is a 
> "hoax"! Wattya gonna learn from him?

You admitted you post lies and other nonsense to get a rise out of people.
ergo you are an admitted lier and troll.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616999

On 2/4/2017 6:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 2/3/2017 10:39 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:15:59 PM UTC-8, benj wrote:
>>>>> On 2/3/2017 7:47 PM, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 3:26:22 PM UTC-8, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You never read the links, did you? All these questions are explained.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You CAN read, correct?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Typical debunker bullshit. Everybody knows that if you want to know if
>>>>> moon landing was a hoax, the way to do the science is the way one always
>>>>> does science...You take a democratic vote. only 6% of the people say
>>>>> moon landing was a hoax just like 96% of scientists say that global
>>>>> warming is man caused. That is all the scientific proof anyone needs.
>>>>> And if you still harbor any doubts simply ask HVAC. No higher science
>>>>> authority exists. Done.
>>>>
>>>> Typical crank response. Anyone with half a brain knows that consensus is illegitimate as an argument.
>>>>
>>>> Do you, too, Benj, claim that the moon landings were faked?
>>>
>>> Does it really matter what an admitted lier and troll has to say
>>> about anything?
>>
>> "Lier"?  I see Chimp is still showing his lack of education and
>> intelligence in a public world wide forum. It has already been proven
>> that John and Bert know more science than he does. He thinks ice is a
>> "hoax"! Wattya gonna learn from him?
>
> You admitted you post lies and other nonsense to get a rise out of people.
> ergo you are an admitted lier and troll.
>
>
HVAC told me that getting people "mad" on he INTERNET cures all mental 
illness. He says it works for him. Better get some science lessons from 
Bert fast before it's too late! You don't want to stay dumb for the rest 
of your days do you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617021

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 2/4/2017 6:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 2/3/2017 10:39 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:15:59 PM UTC-8, benj wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/3/2017 7:47 PM, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 3:26:22 PM UTC-8, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You never read the links, did you? All these questions are explained.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You CAN read, correct?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Typical debunker bullshit. Everybody knows that if you want to know if
>>>>>> moon landing was a hoax, the way to do the science is the way one always
>>>>>> does science...You take a democratic vote. only 6% of the people say
>>>>>> moon landing was a hoax just like 96% of scientists say that global
>>>>>> warming is man caused. That is all the scientific proof anyone needs.
>>>>>> And if you still harbor any doubts simply ask HVAC. No higher science
>>>>>> authority exists. Done.
>>>>>
>>>>> Typical crank response. Anyone with half a brain knows that consensus is illegitimate as an argument.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you, too, Benj, claim that the moon landings were faked?
>>>>
>>>> Does it really matter what an admitted lier and troll has to say
>>>> about anything?
>>>
>>> "Lier"?  I see Chimp is still showing his lack of education and
>>> intelligence in a public world wide forum. It has already been proven
>>> that John and Bert know more science than he does. He thinks ice is a
>>> "hoax"! Wattya gonna learn from him?
>>
>> You admitted you post lies and other nonsense to get a rise out of people.
>> ergo you are an admitted lier and troll.
>>
>>
> HVAC told me that getting people "mad" on he INTERNET cures all mental 
> illness. He says it works for him. Better get some science lessons from 
> Bert fast before it's too late! You don't want to stay dumb for the rest 
> of your days do you?

Pointless troll ad hominem.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617001

On 2/4/2017 6:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 2/3/2017 10:39 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:15:59 PM UTC-8, benj wrote:
>>>>> On 2/3/2017 7:47 PM, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 3:26:22 PM UTC-8, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You never read the links, did you? All these questions are explained.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You CAN read, correct?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Typical debunker bullshit. Everybody knows that if you want to know if
>>>>> moon landing was a hoax, the way to do the science is the way one always
>>>>> does science...You take a democratic vote. only 6% of the people say
>>>>> moon landing was a hoax just like 96% of scientists say that global
>>>>> warming is man caused. That is all the scientific proof anyone needs.
>>>>> And if you still harbor any doubts simply ask HVAC. No higher science
>>>>> authority exists. Done.
>>>>
>>>> Typical crank response. Anyone with half a brain knows that consensus is illegitimate as an argument.
>>>>
>>>> Do you, too, Benj, claim that the moon landings were faked?
>>>
>>> Does it really matter what an admitted lier and troll has to say
>>> about anything?
>>
>> "Lier"?  I see Chimp is still showing his lack of education and
>> intelligence in a public world wide forum. It has already been proven
>> that John and Bert know more science than he does. He thinks ice is a
>> "hoax"! Wattya gonna learn from him?
>
> You admitted you post lies and other nonsense to get a rise out of people.
> ergo you are an admitted lier and troll.

BWAHAHAHAHA!  Hey chimp here is some wisdom: When you find yourself in a 
hole, STOP DIGGING!

So I post lies, so therefore you think I'm a "lier"?  <snort> So Tell 
looperji what "school" you went to...

Chimp here is the lesson: A person that posts lies is called a "Liar".
A person who lies around a lot (like say HVAC) is called a "lier".
Ironically HVAC is both a pathological lier and a pathological liar!

Where did you get that GED? I bet it only took you 3 months instead of 
the usual 6.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617023

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 2/4/2017 6:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 2/3/2017 10:39 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:15:59 PM UTC-8, benj wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/3/2017 7:47 PM, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 3:26:22 PM UTC-8, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You never read the links, did you? All these questions are explained.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You CAN read, correct?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Typical debunker bullshit. Everybody knows that if you want to know if
>>>>>> moon landing was a hoax, the way to do the science is the way one always
>>>>>> does science...You take a democratic vote. only 6% of the people say
>>>>>> moon landing was a hoax just like 96% of scientists say that global
>>>>>> warming is man caused. That is all the scientific proof anyone needs.
>>>>>> And if you still harbor any doubts simply ask HVAC. No higher science
>>>>>> authority exists. Done.
>>>>>
>>>>> Typical crank response. Anyone with half a brain knows that consensus is illegitimate as an argument.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you, too, Benj, claim that the moon landings were faked?
>>>>
>>>> Does it really matter what an admitted lier and troll has to say
>>>> about anything?
>>>
>>> "Lier"?  I see Chimp is still showing his lack of education and
>>> intelligence in a public world wide forum. It has already been proven
>>> that John and Bert know more science than he does. He thinks ice is a
>>> "hoax"! Wattya gonna learn from him?
>>
>> You admitted you post lies and other nonsense to get a rise out of people.
>> ergo you are an admitted lier and troll.
> 
> BWAHAHAHAHA!  Hey chimp here is some wisdom: When you find yourself in a 
> hole, STOP DIGGING!
> 
> So I post lies, so therefore you think I'm a "lier"?  <snort> So Tell 
> looperji what "school" you went to...
> 
> Chimp here is the lesson: A person that posts lies is called a "Liar".
> A person who lies around a lot (like say HVAC) is called a "lier".
> Ironically HVAC is both a pathological lier and a pathological liar!
> 
> Where did you get that GED? I bet it only took you 3 months instead of 
> the usual 6.
 
Pointless troll ad hominem and troll fixation on a minor typo. 
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617043

On 2/4/2017 7:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 2/4/2017 6:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> On 2/3/2017 10:39 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:15:59 PM UTC-8, benj wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/3/2017 7:47 PM, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 3:26:22 PM UTC-8, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You never read the links, did you? All these questions are explained.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You CAN read, correct?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Typical debunker bullshit. Everybody knows that if you want to know if
>>>>>>> moon landing was a hoax, the way to do the science is the way one always
>>>>>>> does science...You take a democratic vote. only 6% of the people say
>>>>>>> moon landing was a hoax just like 96% of scientists say that global
>>>>>>> warming is man caused. That is all the scientific proof anyone needs.
>>>>>>> And if you still harbor any doubts simply ask HVAC. No higher science
>>>>>>> authority exists. Done.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Typical crank response. Anyone with half a brain knows that consensus is illegitimate as an argument.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you, too, Benj, claim that the moon landings were faked?
>>>>>
>>>>> Does it really matter what an admitted lier and troll has to say
>>>>> about anything?
>>>>
>>>> "Lier"?  I see Chimp is still showing his lack of education and
>>>> intelligence in a public world wide forum. It has already been proven
>>>> that John and Bert know more science than he does. He thinks ice is a
>>>> "hoax"! Wattya gonna learn from him?
>>>
>>> You admitted you post lies and other nonsense to get a rise out of people.
>>> ergo you are an admitted lier and troll.
>>
>> BWAHAHAHAHA!  Hey chimp here is some wisdom: When you find yourself in a
>> hole, STOP DIGGING!
>>
>> So I post lies, so therefore you think I'm a "lier"?  <snort> So Tell
>> looperji what "school" you went to...
>>
>> Chimp here is the lesson: A person that posts lies is called a "Liar".
>> A person who lies around a lot (like say HVAC) is called a "lier".
>> Ironically HVAC is both a pathological lier and a pathological liar!
>>
>> Where did you get that GED? I bet it only took you 3 months instead of
>> the usual 6.
>
> Pointless troll ad hominem and troll fixation on a minor typo.

A typo is when you make a mechanical mistake while typing. Purposely 
spelling a word wrong is showing how dumb you are. I'm surprised you 
didn't spell it "miner typo".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617058

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 2/4/2017 7:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 2/4/2017 6:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 2/3/2017 10:39 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:15:59 PM UTC-8, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2017 7:47 PM, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 3:26:22 PM UTC-8, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You never read the links, did you? All these questions are explained.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You CAN read, correct?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Typical debunker bullshit. Everybody knows that if you want to know if
>>>>>>>> moon landing was a hoax, the way to do the science is the way one always
>>>>>>>> does science...You take a democratic vote. only 6% of the people say
>>>>>>>> moon landing was a hoax just like 96% of scientists say that global
>>>>>>>> warming is man caused. That is all the scientific proof anyone needs.
>>>>>>>> And if you still harbor any doubts simply ask HVAC. No higher science
>>>>>>>> authority exists. Done.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Typical crank response. Anyone with half a brain knows that consensus is illegitimate as an argument.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you, too, Benj, claim that the moon landings were faked?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does it really matter what an admitted lier and troll has to say
>>>>>> about anything?
>>>>>
>>>>> "Lier"?  I see Chimp is still showing his lack of education and
>>>>> intelligence in a public world wide forum. It has already been proven
>>>>> that John and Bert know more science than he does. He thinks ice is a
>>>>> "hoax"! Wattya gonna learn from him?
>>>>
>>>> You admitted you post lies and other nonsense to get a rise out of people.
>>>> ergo you are an admitted lier and troll.
>>>
>>> BWAHAHAHAHA!  Hey chimp here is some wisdom: When you find yourself in a
>>> hole, STOP DIGGING!
>>>
>>> So I post lies, so therefore you think I'm a "lier"?  <snort> So Tell
>>> looperji what "school" you went to...
>>>
>>> Chimp here is the lesson: A person that posts lies is called a "Liar".
>>> A person who lies around a lot (like say HVAC) is called a "lier".
>>> Ironically HVAC is both a pathological lier and a pathological liar!
>>>
>>> Where did you get that GED? I bet it only took you 3 months instead of
>>> the usual 6.
>>
>> Pointless troll ad hominem and troll fixation on a minor typo.
> 
> A typo is when you make a mechanical mistake while typing. Purposely 
> spelling a word wrong is showing how dumb you are. I'm surprised you 
> didn't spell it "miner typo".

Pointless troll ad hominem.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617248

On 2/4/2017 10:14 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 2/4/2017 7:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> On 2/4/2017 6:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/3/2017 10:39 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:15:59 PM UTC-8, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2017 7:47 PM, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 3:26:22 PM UTC-8, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You never read the links, did you? All these questions are explained.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You CAN read, correct?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Typical debunker bullshit. Everybody knows that if you want to know if
>>>>>>>>> moon landing was a hoax, the way to do the science is the way one always
>>>>>>>>> does science...You take a democratic vote. only 6% of the people say
>>>>>>>>> moon landing was a hoax just like 96% of scientists say that global
>>>>>>>>> warming is man caused. That is all the scientific proof anyone needs.
>>>>>>>>> And if you still harbor any doubts simply ask HVAC. No higher science
>>>>>>>>> authority exists. Done.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Typical crank response. Anyone with half a brain knows that consensus is illegitimate as an argument.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you, too, Benj, claim that the moon landings were faked?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does it really matter what an admitted lier and troll has to say
>>>>>>> about anything?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Lier"?  I see Chimp is still showing his lack of education and
>>>>>> intelligence in a public world wide forum. It has already been proven
>>>>>> that John and Bert know more science than he does. He thinks ice is a
>>>>>> "hoax"! Wattya gonna learn from him?
>>>>>
>>>>> You admitted you post lies and other nonsense to get a rise out of people.
>>>>> ergo you are an admitted lier and troll.
>>>>
>>>> BWAHAHAHAHA!  Hey chimp here is some wisdom: When you find yourself in a
>>>> hole, STOP DIGGING!
>>>>
>>>> So I post lies, so therefore you think I'm a "lier"?  <snort> So Tell
>>>> looperji what "school" you went to...
>>>>
>>>> Chimp here is the lesson: A person that posts lies is called a "Liar".
>>>> A person who lies around a lot (like say HVAC) is called a "lier".
>>>> Ironically HVAC is both a pathological lier and a pathological liar!
>>>>
>>>> Where did you get that GED? I bet it only took you 3 months instead of
>>>> the usual 6.
>>>
>>> Pointless troll ad hominem and troll fixation on a minor typo.
>>
>> A typo is when you make a mechanical mistake while typing. Purposely
>> spelling a word wrong is showing how dumb you are. I'm surprised you
>> didn't spell it "miner typo".
>
> Pointless troll ad hominem.
>

No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617285

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 2/4/2017 10:14 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 2/4/2017 7:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 2/4/2017 6:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/3/2017 10:39 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:15:59 PM UTC-8, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2017 7:47 PM, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 3:26:22 PM UTC-8, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You never read the links, did you? All these questions are explained.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You CAN read, correct?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Typical debunker bullshit. Everybody knows that if you want to know if
>>>>>>>>>> moon landing was a hoax, the way to do the science is the way one always
>>>>>>>>>> does science...You take a democratic vote. only 6% of the people say
>>>>>>>>>> moon landing was a hoax just like 96% of scientists say that global
>>>>>>>>>> warming is man caused. That is all the scientific proof anyone needs.
>>>>>>>>>> And if you still harbor any doubts simply ask HVAC. No higher science
>>>>>>>>>> authority exists. Done.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Typical crank response. Anyone with half a brain knows that consensus is illegitimate as an argument.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you, too, Benj, claim that the moon landings were faked?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does it really matter what an admitted lier and troll has to say
>>>>>>>> about anything?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Lier"?  I see Chimp is still showing his lack of education and
>>>>>>> intelligence in a public world wide forum. It has already been proven
>>>>>>> that John and Bert know more science than he does. He thinks ice is a
>>>>>>> "hoax"! Wattya gonna learn from him?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You admitted you post lies and other nonsense to get a rise out of people.
>>>>>> ergo you are an admitted lier and troll.
>>>>>
>>>>> BWAHAHAHAHA!  Hey chimp here is some wisdom: When you find yourself in a
>>>>> hole, STOP DIGGING!
>>>>>
>>>>> So I post lies, so therefore you think I'm a "lier"?  <snort> So Tell
>>>>> looperji what "school" you went to...
>>>>>
>>>>> Chimp here is the lesson: A person that posts lies is called a "Liar".
>>>>> A person who lies around a lot (like say HVAC) is called a "lier".
>>>>> Ironically HVAC is both a pathological lier and a pathological liar!
>>>>>
>>>>> Where did you get that GED? I bet it only took you 3 months instead of
>>>>> the usual 6.
>>>>
>>>> Pointless troll ad hominem and troll fixation on a minor typo.
>>>
>>> A typo is when you make a mechanical mistake while typing. Purposely
>>> spelling a word wrong is showing how dumb you are. I'm surprised you
>>> didn't spell it "miner typo".
>>
>> Pointless troll ad hominem.
>>
> 
> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth.

There is no point to attempting to discuss anything with an admitted troll.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617300

On 2/6/2017 6:49 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 2/4/2017 10:14 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> On 2/4/2017 7:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/4/2017 6:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2017 10:39 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:15:59 PM UTC-8, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2017 7:47 PM, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 3:26:22 PM UTC-8, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You never read the links, did you? All these questions are explained.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You CAN read, correct?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Typical debunker bullshit. Everybody knows that if you want to know if
>>>>>>>>>>> moon landing was a hoax, the way to do the science is the way one always
>>>>>>>>>>> does science...You take a democratic vote. only 6% of the people say
>>>>>>>>>>> moon landing was a hoax just like 96% of scientists say that global
>>>>>>>>>>> warming is man caused. That is all the scientific proof anyone needs.
>>>>>>>>>>> And if you still harbor any doubts simply ask HVAC. No higher science
>>>>>>>>>>> authority exists. Done.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Typical crank response. Anyone with half a brain knows that consensus is illegitimate as an argument.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you, too, Benj, claim that the moon landings were faked?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Does it really matter what an admitted lier and troll has to say
>>>>>>>>> about anything?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Lier"?  I see Chimp is still showing his lack of education and
>>>>>>>> intelligence in a public world wide forum. It has already been proven
>>>>>>>> that John and Bert know more science than he does. He thinks ice is a
>>>>>>>> "hoax"! Wattya gonna learn from him?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You admitted you post lies and other nonsense to get a rise out of people.
>>>>>>> ergo you are an admitted lier and troll.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BWAHAHAHAHA!  Hey chimp here is some wisdom: When you find yourself in a
>>>>>> hole, STOP DIGGING!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I post lies, so therefore you think I'm a "lier"?  <snort> So Tell
>>>>>> looperji what "school" you went to...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chimp here is the lesson: A person that posts lies is called a "Liar".
>>>>>> A person who lies around a lot (like say HVAC) is called a "lier".
>>>>>> Ironically HVAC is both a pathological lier and a pathological liar!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Where did you get that GED? I bet it only took you 3 months instead of
>>>>>> the usual 6.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pointless troll ad hominem and troll fixation on a minor typo.
>>>>
>>>> A typo is when you make a mechanical mistake while typing. Purposely
>>>> spelling a word wrong is showing how dumb you are. I'm surprised you
>>>> didn't spell it "miner typo".
>>>
>>> Pointless troll ad hominem.
>>>
>>
>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth.
>
> There is no point to attempting to discuss anything with an admitted troll.
>
>
No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617312

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 2/6/2017 6:49 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 2/4/2017 10:14 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 2/4/2017 7:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/4/2017 6:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2017 10:39 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:15:59 PM UTC-8, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2017 7:47 PM, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 3:26:22 PM UTC-8, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Apollo 11 mission's lunar lander did not land on the surface of the moon...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You never read the links, did you? All these questions are explained.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You CAN read, correct?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Typical debunker bullshit. Everybody knows that if you want to know if
>>>>>>>>>>>> moon landing was a hoax, the way to do the science is the way one always
>>>>>>>>>>>> does science...You take a democratic vote. only 6% of the people say
>>>>>>>>>>>> moon landing was a hoax just like 96% of scientists say that global
>>>>>>>>>>>> warming is man caused. That is all the scientific proof anyone needs.
>>>>>>>>>>>> And if you still harbor any doubts simply ask HVAC. No higher science
>>>>>>>>>>>> authority exists. Done.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Typical crank response. Anyone with half a brain knows that consensus is illegitimate as an argument.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you, too, Benj, claim that the moon landings were faked?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Does it really matter what an admitted lier and troll has to say
>>>>>>>>>> about anything?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Lier"?  I see Chimp is still showing his lack of education and
>>>>>>>>> intelligence in a public world wide forum. It has already been proven
>>>>>>>>> that John and Bert know more science than he does. He thinks ice is a
>>>>>>>>> "hoax"! Wattya gonna learn from him?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You admitted you post lies and other nonsense to get a rise out of people.
>>>>>>>> ergo you are an admitted lier and troll.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BWAHAHAHAHA!  Hey chimp here is some wisdom: When you find yourself in a
>>>>>>> hole, STOP DIGGING!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I post lies, so therefore you think I'm a "lier"?  <snort> So Tell
>>>>>>> looperji what "school" you went to...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Chimp here is the lesson: A person that posts lies is called a "Liar".
>>>>>>> A person who lies around a lot (like say HVAC) is called a "lier".
>>>>>>> Ironically HVAC is both a pathological lier and a pathological liar!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where did you get that GED? I bet it only took you 3 months instead of
>>>>>>> the usual 6.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pointless troll ad hominem and troll fixation on a minor typo.
>>>>>
>>>>> A typo is when you make a mechanical mistake while typing. Purposely
>>>>> spelling a word wrong is showing how dumb you are. I'm surprised you
>>>>> didn't spell it "miner typo".
>>>>
>>>> Pointless troll ad hominem.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth.
>>
>> There is no point to attempting to discuss anything with an admitted troll.
>>
>>
> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth.

As I said, there is no point to attempting to discuss anything with
an admitted troll and liar.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web