Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #640637 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-15 13:43 -0400 |
| Last post | 2017-07-30 21:22 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 259 — 29 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-15 13:43 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-07-15 18:39 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 18:31 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-15 18:57 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 19:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-15 19:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 20:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 00:49 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:25 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-07-17 22:34 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:53 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:49 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-07-16 12:24 +1000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-16 11:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-16 11:18 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-16 12:35 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 10:07 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:09 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 13:24 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 19:22 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 16:35 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 18:47 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:48 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:56 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:50 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-07-17 22:37 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:08 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 13:26 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 11:48 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:54 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:09 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:51 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:01 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 14:33 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 20:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 23:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:33 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:03 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:23 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 00:00 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:33 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:04 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:03 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 01:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 10:20 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 12:38 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:44 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 12:47 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:54 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 11:30 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:25 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-19 21:19 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:22 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 16:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 17:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 15:36 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 21:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 20:03 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-19 20:21 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-19 18:03 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:32 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 16:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:58 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:52 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 11:38 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:51 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 09:59 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:40 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:49 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 19:13 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:03 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:53 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:53 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:57 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 12:04 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-07-16 20:35 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:40 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-07-16 21:19 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 19:30 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 16:34 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-17 02:02 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 02:02 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:21 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:17 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-17 15:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:09 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:58 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:01 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:22 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:45 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:33 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:04 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 19:25 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 17:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:19 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 08:41 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:34 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:05 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:07 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-17 22:06 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 18:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:27 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:58 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:26 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 11:46 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:47 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 17:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:46 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 08:43 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:35 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:06 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:15 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 00:02 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:35 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:04 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 01:15 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 21:43 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-19 21:23 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 03:42 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 11:29 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 17:27 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-20 19:17 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 00:15 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-20 21:20 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 01:41 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 09:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-15 21:46 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 02:13 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 10:11 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 05:49 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 15:26 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 12:45 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 12:08 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 17:10 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 13:43 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 18:07 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 15:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 19:32 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 17:32 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 22:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-22 10:51 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 17:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 17:58 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-22 18:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-22 21:25 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 20:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-24 05:35 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-24 08:39 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-24 20:15 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-25 11:56 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 20:23 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-26 20:28 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 18:47 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-29 21:18 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-29 23:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-31 17:05 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-24 20:13 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-15 20:09 +0100
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 19:19 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 05:44 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 15:24 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 12:17 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 17:07 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 13:42 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 18:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> - 2017-07-21 13:46 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 15:07 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 19:30 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 17:31 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 22:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 19:04 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-22 00:22 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 18:46 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 02:00 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 22:38 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 03:07 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-16 09:20 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-07-17 22:29 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-21 04:18 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 15:29 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-15 12:51 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-15 23:47 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 00:58 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-16 09:22 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:13 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 08:46 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 10:13 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 06:26 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 15:32 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 11:09 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-21 21:44 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 22:17 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-22 02:16 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-23 10:33 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-23 16:34 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-24 12:10 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> - 2017-07-24 05:19 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-24 12:32 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-24 08:52 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-24 16:56 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-24 12:02 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-24 23:51 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> - 2017-07-24 17:16 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-25 01:12 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> - 2017-07-24 18:25 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-25 11:54 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-24 17:19 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-24 17:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-24 23:33 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-24 21:02 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 13:12 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 17:25 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 13:45 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 18:08 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-21 18:53 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-22 00:23 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 06:00 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-07-21 09:48 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 13:30 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-21 17:30 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 13:34 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> - 2017-07-21 13:08 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-07-15 19:51 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-21 06:05 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-07-21 19:36 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-22 10:39 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-22 12:47 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-26 18:18 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-07-26 18:27 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-22 11:40 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-07-23 14:32 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 10:03 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 09:33 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-07-30 21:19 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 09:33 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-07-30 21:22 -0700
Page 3 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 13 Next page →
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 14:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okj3ej$1ved$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #641062 |
On 7/17/2017 11:52 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>> Serg io wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>> >>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>> >>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>> >>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >> >> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >> correct your posts become. > > You can not plate solder. > > PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to > the copper. > its called wave soldering, most everybody does it. I knew a guy that tried to grab a board that sank into the wave, and dipped his hand in it, pulled it out real fast but he had burns. Gold plating is also avoided due to the chemicals needed to support that process, a while back the EPA put the chomp on many of them,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 20:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cshv3e-tch.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #641091 |
In sci.physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> wrote: > On 7/17/2017 11:52 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>> >>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>> >>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. > >>>> >>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>> >>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>> correct your posts become. >> >> You can not plate solder. >> >> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >> the copper. >> > > its called wave soldering, most everybody does it. No shit? > I knew a guy that > tried to grab a board that sank into the wave, and dipped his hand in > it, pulled it out real fast but he had burns. > > Gold plating is also avoided due to the chemicals needed to support that > process, a while back the EPA put the chomp on many of them, That and gold is $1,233.40 an ounce while tin is about $9.00 a pound. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 18:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596d35c2$0$34552$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #641091 |
On 7/17/2017 3:33 PM, Serg io wrote: > On 7/17/2017 11:52 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it >>>>>>>> is used >>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>> >>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>> >>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my >>>>> PCBs are >>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. > >>>> >>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>> >>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>> correct your posts become. >> >> You can not plate solder. >> >> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >> the copper. >> > > its called wave soldering, most everybody does it. I knew a guy that > tried to grab a board that sank into the wave, and dipped his hand in > it, pulled it out real fast but he had burns. > > Gold plating is also avoided due to the chemicals needed to support that > process, a while back the EPA put the chomp on many of them, > Chimp as usual shows his ignorance of all things technical. When contact fingers are not gold plated they are solder plated. And yes, I used to have two 5 gallon containers of one each lead fluoroborate and Tin Fluoroborate which are the two main chemicals for solder plating. Luckily I sold them before the EPA put the chomp on me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 23:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9jvv3e-kri.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #641117 |
In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 7/17/2017 3:33 PM, Serg io wrote: >> On 7/17/2017 11:52 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it >>>>>>>>> is used >>>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>>> >>>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my >>>>>> PCBs are >>>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >> >>>>> >>>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>>> >>>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>>> correct your posts become. >>> >>> You can not plate solder. >>> >>> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >>> the copper. >>> >> >> its called wave soldering, most everybody does it. I knew a guy that >> tried to grab a board that sank into the wave, and dipped his hand in >> it, pulled it out real fast but he had burns. >> >> Gold plating is also avoided due to the chemicals needed to support that >> process, a while back the EPA put the chomp on many of them, >> > Chimp as <snip> The troll continues to seek attention, starting with an ad hominem. The only thing the troll has ever posted worth reading: "Sorry, Looperji, but while I do love to troll and lie" -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 22:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596d7364$0$11353$b1db1813$e2fc9064@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #641132 |
On 7/17/2017 7:59 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 7/17/2017 3:33 PM, Serg io wrote: >>> On 7/17/2017 11:52 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it >>>>>>>>>> is used >>>>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my >>>>>>> PCBs are >>>>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>>>> >>>>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>>>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>>>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>>>> correct your posts become. >>>> >>>> You can not plate solder. >>>> >>>> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >>>> the copper. >>>> >>> >>> its called wave soldering, most everybody does it. I knew a guy that >>> tried to grab a board that sank into the wave, and dipped his hand in >>> it, pulled it out real fast but he had burns. >>> >>> Gold plating is also avoided due to the chemicals needed to support that >>> process, a while back the EPA put the chomp on many of them, >>> >> Chimp as <snip> > > The troll continues to seek attention, starting with an ad hominem. > > The only thing the troll has ever posted worth reading: > > "Sorry, Looperji, but while I do love to troll and lie" > Chimp is right on the money again. I actually was lying when I said he said something that was right.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 04:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <etd04e-5ck.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #641158 |
In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 7/17/2017 7:59 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 7/17/2017 3:33 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>> On 7/17/2017 11:52 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it >>>>>>>>>>> is used >>>>>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my >>>>>>>> PCBs are >>>>>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>>>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>>>>> >>>>>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>>>>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>>>>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>>>>> correct your posts become. >>>>> >>>>> You can not plate solder. >>>>> >>>>> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >>>>> the copper. >>>>> >>>> >>>> its called wave soldering, most everybody does it. I knew a guy that >>>> tried to grab a board that sank into the wave, and dipped his hand in >>>> it, pulled it out real fast but he had burns. >>>> >>>> Gold plating is also avoided due to the chemicals needed to support that >>>> process, a while back the EPA put the chomp on many of them, >>>> >>> Chimp as <snip> >> >> The troll continues to seek attention, starting with an ad hominem. >> >> The only thing the troll has ever posted worth reading: >> >> "Sorry, Looperji, but while I do love to troll and lie" >> > Chimp <snip troll drool> The troll seeks attention with the usual ad hominems. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 18:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596d3903$0$53051$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #641062 |
On 7/17/2017 12:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com drooled: > In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>> Serg io wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>> >>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>> >>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>>> >>> >>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >> >> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >> correct your posts become. > > You can not plate solder. > > PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to > the copper. > Non Sequitur.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 00:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2lvv3e-kri.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #641123 |
In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 7/17/2017 12:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com drooled: >> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>> >>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>> >>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>>>> >>>> >>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>> >>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>> correct your posts become. >> >> You can not plate solder. >> >> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >> the copper. >> > Non Sequitur. The only thing the troll has ever posted worth reading: "Sorry, Looperji, but while I do love to troll and lie" -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 22:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596d7388$0$11353$b1db1813$e2fc9064@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #641133 |
On 7/17/2017 8:00 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 7/17/2017 12:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com drooled: >>> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>>> >>>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >>>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>>> >>>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>>> correct your posts become. >>> >>> You can not plate solder. >>> >>> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >>> the copper. >>> >> Non Sequitur. > > The only thing the troll has ever posted worth reading: > > "Sorry, Looperji, but while I do love to troll and lie" > > Double non Sequitur. Go for three, Chimp?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 04:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cvd04e-5ck.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #641159 |
In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 7/17/2017 8:00 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 7/17/2017 12:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com drooled: >>>> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >>>>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>>>> >>>>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>>>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>>>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>>>> correct your posts become. >>>> >>>> You can not plate solder. >>>> >>>> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >>>> the copper. >>>> >>> Non Sequitur. >> >> The only thing the troll has ever posted worth reading: >> >> "Sorry, Looperji, but while I do love to troll and lie" >> >> > Double non Sequitur. Go for three, Chimp? The troll continues the ad hominems in the desparate search for attention. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-19 20:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596ff361$1$41305$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #641168 |
On 7/18/2017 12:04 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 7/17/2017 8:00 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 7/17/2017 12:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com drooled: >>>>> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >>>>>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>>>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>>>>> >>>>>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>>>>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>>>>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>>>>> correct your posts become. >>>>> >>>>> You can not plate solder. >>>>> >>>>> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >>>>> the copper. >>>>> >>>> Non Sequitur. >>> >>> The only thing the troll has ever posted worth reading: >>> >>> "Sorry, Looperji, but while I do love to troll and lie" >>> >>> >> Double non Sequitur. Go for three, Chimp? > > The troll continues the ad hominems in the desparate search for attention. > Senile Chimp is stuck in a dementia loop and can't get up!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-20 01:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2oc54e-lg7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #641425 |
In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 7/18/2017 12:04 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 7/17/2017 8:00 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 7/17/2017 12:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com drooled: >>>>>> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>>>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>>>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >>>>>>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>>>>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>>>>>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>>>>>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>>>>>> correct your posts become. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can not plate solder. >>>>>> >>>>>> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >>>>>> the copper. >>>>>> >>>>> Non Sequitur. >>>> >>>> The only thing the troll has ever posted worth reading: >>>> >>>> "Sorry, Looperji, but while I do love to troll and lie" >>>> >>>> >>> Double non Sequitur. Go for three, Chimp? >> >> The troll continues the ad hominems in the desparate search for attention. >> > Senile Chimp <snip> Yet more ad hominem from the pathetic troll. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 17:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oklfah$1hql$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #641062 |
jimp wrote: > PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to > the copper. Idiot, this might have been fifty years ago. Today around and below 0201 components what you say is toootaly stupid. All smd boards are today gold plated, no need for solder. What an idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 10:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b8ea87d5-3c32-4b1e-ba62-ae9913bc26c1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #641224 |
On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 10:08:40 AM UTC-7, Ustin Veterre wrote: > jimp wrote: > > > PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to > > the copper. > > Idiot, this might have been fifty years ago. Today around and below 0201 > components what you say is toootaly stupid. All smd boards are today gold > plated, no need for solder. What an idiot. Poor dumb Sergio.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 12:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oklh39$1p6n$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #641224 |
On 7/18/2017 12:08 PM, Ustin Veterre wrote: > > > All smd boards are today gold plated, no need for solder. > wrong. OSP is used to react w copper + keeps copper from tarnishing, That 'gold' is OSP, "Organic Solderability Preservative" a water-based organic compound. Or it could be ENIG Gold has poor solderability, so it is not use on areas to be soldered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 17:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oklhe0$1p75$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #641230 |
Serg io wrote: >> All smd boards are today gold plated, no need for solder. > > wrong. OSP is used to react w copper + keeps copper from tarnishing, > That 'gold' is OSP, "Organic Solderability Preservative" a Let me guess. You got this whatever crap from a website. Take a look into your smart-phone, young man. Better yet, smash the major components with a hammer. Inspect it through a powerful microscope.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 12:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oklhk5$1q4i$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #641232 |
On 7/18/2017 12:44 PM, Ustin Veterre wrote: > Serg io wrote: > >>> All smd boards are today gold plated, no need for solder. >> >> wrong. OSP is used to react w copper + keeps copper from tarnishing, >> That 'gold' is OSP, "Organic Solderability Preservative" a > > Let me guess. You got this whatever crap from a website. Take a look into > your smart-phone, young man. Better yet, smash the major components with a > hammer. Inspect it through a powerful microscope. > nope, google "purple plague" well known in the industry and a major reason not to use gold.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 17:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okli0q$1qih$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #641235 |
Serg io wrote: > On 7/18/2017 12:44 PM, Ustin Veterre wrote: >> Serg io wrote: >> >>>> All smd boards are today gold plated, no need for solder. >>> >>> wrong. OSP is used to react w copper + keeps copper from tarnishing, >>> That 'gold' is OSP, "Organic Solderability Preservative" a >> >> Let me guess. You got this whatever crap from a website. Take a look >> into your smart-phone, young man. Better yet, smash the major >> components with a >> hammer. Inspect it through a powerful microscope. > > nope, google "purple plague" well known in the industry and a major > reason not to use gold. Mee to google?? the globalist google is googling MEE, young man. You are tootaly unemployable in any civilized country, no offence. You almost, not even, former half-engineers stick together like hyenas. Never learning anything. Talk to somebody else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 11:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fbe89f9e-df58-46b2-951c-b56873b229a5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #641236 |
On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 1:54:41 PM UTC-4, Ustin Veterre wrote: > Serg io wrote: > > > On 7/18/2017 12:44 PM, Ustin Veterre wrote: > >> Serg io wrote: > >> > >>>> All smd boards are today gold plated, no need for solder. > >>> > >>> wrong. OSP is used to react w copper + keeps copper from tarnishing, > >>> That 'gold' is OSP, "Organic Solderability Preservative" a > >> > >> Let me guess. You got this whatever crap from a website. Take a look > >> into your smart-phone, young man. Better yet, smash the major > >> components with a > >> hammer. Inspect it through a powerful microscope. > > > > nope, google "purple plague" well known in the industry and a major > > reason not to use gold. > > Mee to google?? the globalist google is googling MEE, young man. You are > tootaly unemployable in any civilized country, no offence. You almost, not > even, former half-engineers stick together like hyenas. Never learning > anything. Talk to somebody else. Wait... what?! I think you're trying to talk to me==MahipalJi. Bring it on. No I don't care which new anonymous handle you'll use. Wimp! Bring it... Never you ever go after me m(y) friends like Sir SergioJi! Never ever! You want a fight, sure. Bring it. Let's see your face. In your face, PUNCH! Anybody with the proper Nepotism, can be USA employed. So what's new? -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes... Enjo(y)!” Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-19 20:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596ff86a$0$42074$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #641235 |
On 7/18/2017 1:47 PM, Serg io wrote: > On 7/18/2017 12:44 PM, Ustin Veterre wrote: >> Serg io wrote: >> >>>> All smd boards are today gold plated, no need for solder. >>> >>> wrong. OSP is used to react w copper + keeps copper from tarnishing, >>> That 'gold' is OSP, "Organic Solderability Preservative" a >> >> Let me guess. You got this whatever crap from a website. Take a look into >> your smart-phone, young man. Better yet, smash the major components >> with a >> hammer. Inspect it through a powerful microscope. >> > > nope, google "purple plague" > > well known in the industry and a major reason not to use gold. > > > Sergio why do you bother with this level of ignorance? He's not even fun to bait like Bert or ARchiepoo.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web