Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #558873 > unrolled thread
| Started by | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-03 07:04 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-05 16:57 -0800 |
| Articles | 9 on this page of 69 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 07:04 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 09:22 -0600
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 07:31 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 09:53 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-03 11:58 -0600
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 10:17 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 10:33 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 10:38 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 10:29 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 12:32 -0600
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 09:24 -0600
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 09:46 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 12:12 -0600
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 10:19 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-03-03 10:30 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 10:35 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 12:34 -0600
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 10:40 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 12:45 -0600
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-03 20:17 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 12:41 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 20:53 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 13:20 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 21:59 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 15:04 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 23:43 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 15:51 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 00:10 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 16:29 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 00:44 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 17:34 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 21:14 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 06:48 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 08:14 -0600
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 12:57 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 21:15 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 13:27 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 22:01 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 14:18 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 22:47 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 15:11 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 23:44 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 19:17 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 04:06 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 21:11 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 06:53 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 06:20 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 18:57 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 08:18 -0600
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-03 21:27 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 13:36 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 22:01 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-03 23:44 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 15:55 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 16:41 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 01:37 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 17:55 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 02:40 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:52 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 04:08 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 16:25 -0600
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 14:42 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 23:05 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 15:25 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 23:45 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 22:50 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 15:12 -0800
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 23:48 +0000
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 16:57 -0800
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 16:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nbadkf$hii$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #559001 |
On 3/3/2016 3:27 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> writes: > >> You can't even construct a coherent argument. What's this got to do >> with the subject under discussion. What's this got to do with Earth's >> atmosphere, dumbass. > > I assumed you would be at least somewhat familiar with the gas laws and > how they would apply to water vapor in the atmosphere. My mistake. > I can't tell you how quiet this newsgroup has gotten now that I've killfiled McGinn. If I use a different reader and see all the noise that he has populated the group with, then I'm grateful that his bluster is gone from my view. His "Here's what I think. Prove me wrong!" approach is the hallmark of the crank. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 14:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4fad1eb3-7684-495b-90e9-9f2b84d06b35@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559021 |
On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 2:25:26 PM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 3/3/2016 3:27 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: > > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> writes: > > > >> You can't even construct a coherent argument. What's this got to do > >> with the subject under discussion. What's this got to do with Earth's > >> atmosphere, dumbass. > > > > I assumed you would be at least somewhat familiar with the gas laws and > > how they would apply to water vapor in the atmosphere. My mistake. > > > > I can't tell you how quiet this newsgroup has gotten now that I've > killfiled McGinn. If I use a different reader and see all the noise that > he has populated the group with, then I'm grateful that his bluster is > gone from my view. > > His "Here's what I think. Prove me wrong!" approach is the hallmark of > the crank. Gee, what a shame. We won't have the benefit of you telling us about something you once saw in some book, somewhere, with some name, by some author. Please help some of these other morons learn how to killfile me. I love the smell of killfile in the morning, it smells like . . . victory.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 23:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2ismqc-3h4.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559027 |
Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > I love the smell of killfile in the morning, it smells like . . . victory. On the contrary, it is obvious you are desperately seeking notice and if everyone killfiles you, you have lost. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 15:25 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9dd8a254-059b-4d29-ac5e-c5eabdbee79d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559044 |
On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 3:16:09 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I love the smell of killfile in the morning, it smells like . . . victory. > > On the contrary, it is obvious you are desperately seeking notice and > if everyone killfiles you, you have lost. Good. I will not miss your whining.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 23:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <utumqc-qo4.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559046 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 3:16:09 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > I love the smell of killfile in the morning, it smells like . . . victory. >> >> On the contrary, it is obvious you are desperately seeking notice and >> if everyone killfiles you, you have lost. > > Good. I will not miss your whining. Non sequitur, just like a delusional kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 22:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7mrmqc-nd4.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559021 |
Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/3/2016 3:27 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> You can't even construct a coherent argument. What's this got to do >>> with the subject under discussion. What's this got to do with Earth's >>> atmosphere, dumbass. >> >> I assumed you would be at least somewhat familiar with the gas laws and >> how they would apply to water vapor in the atmosphere. My mistake. >> > > I can't tell you how quiet this newsgroup has gotten now that I've > killfiled McGinn. If I use a different reader and see all the noise that > he has populated the group with, then I'm grateful that his bluster is > gone from my view. > > His "Here's what I think. Prove me wrong!" approach is the hallmark of > the crank. Half right; he demands prove me wrong and refuses to look at any proof. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 15:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <06c89773-4ae0-4887-a502-96e8d9d0345d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559036 |
On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 3:01:06 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 3/3/2016 3:27 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: > >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> writes: > >> > >>> You can't even construct a coherent argument. What's this got to do > >>> with the subject under discussion. What's this got to do with Earth's > >>> atmosphere, dumbass. > >> > >> I assumed you would be at least somewhat familiar with the gas laws and > >> how they would apply to water vapor in the atmosphere. My mistake. > >> > > > > I can't tell you how quiet this newsgroup has gotten now that I've > > killfiled McGinn. If I use a different reader and see all the noise that > > he has populated the group with, then I'm grateful that his bluster is > > gone from my view. > > > > His "Here's what I think. Prove me wrong!" approach is the hallmark of > > the crank. > > Half right; he demands prove me wrong and refuses to look at any proof. You don't have a point you fucking blowhard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 23:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <j2vmqc-qo4.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559041 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 3:01:06 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On 3/3/2016 3:27 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: >> >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> writes: >> >> >> >>> You can't even construct a coherent argument. What's this got to do >> >>> with the subject under discussion. What's this got to do with Earth's >> >>> atmosphere, dumbass. >> >> >> >> I assumed you would be at least somewhat familiar with the gas laws and >> >> how they would apply to water vapor in the atmosphere. My mistake. >> >> >> > >> > I can't tell you how quiet this newsgroup has gotten now that I've >> > killfiled McGinn. If I use a different reader and see all the noise that >> > he has populated the group with, then I'm grateful that his bluster is >> > gone from my view. >> > >> > His "Here's what I think. Prove me wrong!" approach is the hallmark of >> > the crank. >> >> Half right; he demands prove me wrong and refuses to look at any proof. > > You don't have a point you fucking blowhard. You mean other than the hundreds of years of repeatable and reproducible experiments and thousands of text books that directly contradict your delusional nonsense? A common symptom of the delusional is to get angry and lash out at those that would point out their delusions. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 16:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ca223178-04e2-4809-a6bd-17556614a251@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #558927 |
two HOHs would weigh a bit more than air > distinciton betweeb a gas and a liquid? Do you not understand that when two molecules are connected they are a liquid? Is this concept to complex for you dipshits?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web