Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #638597 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-03 08:31 -0400 |
| Last post | 2017-07-26 14:08 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 337 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-03 08:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-07-03 09:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 06:31 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-03 08:37 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 15:21 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 13:14 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 08:00 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-07 15:34 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 14:03 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-07 17:22 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 15:19 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 17:01 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-09 12:49 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-09 23:26 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 20:04 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 07:32 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-10 12:21 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 17:35 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-10 16:10 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-10 17:40 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-10 17:22 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-10 19:49 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2017-07-13 20:17 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-13 21:42 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-13 20:53 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 02:05 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 23:25 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-03 17:04 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-03 14:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-03 18:28 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-03 16:14 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-03 20:57 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 16:14 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 00:45 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 20:11 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 04:55 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 02:29 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 06:49 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 18:02 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-07-04 22:59 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 04:51 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-04 21:33 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 07:16 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 16:47 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 11:08 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 21:02 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 19:12 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 22:16 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 23:30 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 09:35 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 10:05 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:20 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-07 08:03 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:19 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-06 13:09 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 23:05 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 10:52 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 18:07 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-05 14:21 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 19:34 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 15:32 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 23:00 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 10:12 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-06 13:15 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 06:20 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-07 09:39 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 08:11 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-07 14:13 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-06 20:04 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-04 20:08 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-04 09:11 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-07-04 11:47 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 18:19 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-07-04 23:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 04:56 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 23:16 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 18:12 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 07:20 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 16:54 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-05 18:42 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 23:07 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 09:30 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-06 06:35 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-06 16:34 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:25 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-07 04:56 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 02:09 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-07 20:18 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 06:19 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-07 17:13 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 06:49 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-08 17:13 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 07:12 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-09 17:44 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 12:48 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-09 23:27 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 07:11 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 16:30 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 06:49 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-11 17:47 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 13:15 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-11 16:27 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 14:46 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-11 18:36 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 18:20 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-11 21:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-11 22:12 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> - 2017-07-11 19:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 02:24 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 22:44 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-12 10:24 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 20:57 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 23:17 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:42 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 16:11 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 18:21 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-12 07:28 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 05:10 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 17:45 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-12 18:39 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 21:29 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-13 20:27 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 23:22 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-14 11:55 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 21:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 02:11 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 22:56 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 05:03 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:50 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 23:49 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 23:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 05:02 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 08:51 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 17:23 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 18:08 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 02:02 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 12:53 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 13:04 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-16 09:51 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 11:04 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 17:55 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-16 16:15 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 15:32 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:08 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-16 15:21 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:53 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 17:00 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 09:06 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-17 20:23 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 15:27 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-16 17:39 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2017-07-17 09:46 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:16 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 13:04 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 07:04 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 17:48 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 06:50 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-13 17:29 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 05:51 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 05:11 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-15 06:36 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-15 00:27 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 08:52 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 06:40 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-16 16:02 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 06:02 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-17 20:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 06:32 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-18 21:10 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 05:08 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-19 20:17 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 01:11 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 06:23 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 03:35 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 05:56 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-20 10:18 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-07-20 11:34 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 16:25 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 20:42 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 16:40 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 19:54 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-20 19:15 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 20:38 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-21 07:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 16:24 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 17:26 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-15 11:33 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 17:39 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 21:03 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 23:19 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:52 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 16:12 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 19:54 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 09:43 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-13 09:30 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-13 17:37 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 21:07 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 02:18 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 22:59 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 05:07 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 11:19 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-14 13:59 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:55 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 23:53 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 23:07 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 05:06 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 23:17 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 08:57 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 17:53 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 18:12 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 02:07 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 03:13 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-14 07:14 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 17:11 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-14 20:09 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 02:14 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-07-14 23:09 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 05:13 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 23:19 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-15 06:57 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 18:19 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 07:06 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 14:06 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 20:29 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-15 00:33 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-15 16:11 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 21:27 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 18:17 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-15 22:30 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-15 22:07 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 03:15 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 07:16 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 11:45 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:13 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 16:33 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:09 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 06:11 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:46 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 22:24 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 21:53 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 06:38 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 17:35 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 20:26 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 20:12 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 22:12 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-19 00:49 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 05:30 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-19 04:54 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 06:34 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-19 16:14 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 17:24 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-19 00:00 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-19 20:21 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-21 08:00 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-21 09:08 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 17:14 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 13:21 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-14 09:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 17:15 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 16:10 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-15 22:11 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 03:23 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-16 09:58 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 12:05 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:15 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-16 10:56 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:19 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 16:36 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-05 08:19 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-07-05 10:39 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 16:59 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 11:11 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 21:11 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 19:28 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:32 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 19:38 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-09 21:55 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 12:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-10 12:25 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-07-11 13:00 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 12:44 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 18:21 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 16:44 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 19:52 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 09:33 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 03:29 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 21:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-06 01:22 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 22:18 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-06 05:06 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:36 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-07 05:00 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-07 20:25 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-08 00:40 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 17:53 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-09 21:56 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 05:08 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 23:06 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 12:38 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 17:31 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 12:47 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 18:22 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 22:35 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2017-07-07 13:41 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2017-07-05 17:47 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-07-03 22:55 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 20:16 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Peter Stickney <p_stickney@verizon.net> - 2017-07-13 19:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-04 20:04 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-05 08:20 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 05:43 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-04 20:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 06:21 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2017-07-03 18:35 -0800
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 05:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-06 13:38 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 05:10 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-10 17:16 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 05:13 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 08:35 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-07 10:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-09 22:15 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2017-07-10 10:43 +0300
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-10 21:32 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 12:39 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-12 10:58 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 17:54 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-12 15:18 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 20:00 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-12 11:42 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-13 04:17 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 14:05 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-07-16 15:08 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-26 13:33 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-26 17:58 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-26 14:08 -0400
Page 6 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 17 Next page →
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-11 13:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <sdcamc1s537m15nadg349a9fbj8vtnrr6k@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #639977 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home?
>>
>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets.
>>
>
>Could you be any more vague?
>
"Vague"? Do you not know what jewelry and such are?
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-11 16:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <m2damclfb32ve2n9pla9u4lklnvahscbba@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640004 |
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:15:28 -0700, Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>> >>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>> >> >>Could you be any more vague? >> > >"Vague"? Do you not know what jewelry and such are? Why on Earth would anyone print jewelry? Plastic jewelry? ...or are you going to print gold? BTW, I'd like to see you print hardened steel and water companies, too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-11 14:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9jhamc5svhqo2s3k2atqrgib8hsl383vvs@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640005 |
krw@notreal.com wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:15:28 -0700, Fred J. McCall
><fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home?
>>>>
>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Could you be any more vague?
>>>
>>
>>"Vague"? Do you not know what jewelry and such are?
>>
>
>Why on Earth would anyone print jewelry? Plastic jewelry? ...or are
>you going to print gold? BTW, I'd like to see you print hardened
>steel and water companies, too.
>
Do try to keep up. The question was "what do people make at home?"
The question was not "What are people 3D-Printing at home?"
That being said, why not? Where do you get the silly idea that
3D-printing only works for plastics? People are 3D-printing rocket
combustion chambers and you think 'hardened steel' is a problem?
--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-11 18:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nkkamcpfeemsp0qsptgtuh3v92u9ca0b95@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640020 |
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:46:45 -0700, Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >krw@notreal.com wrote: > >>On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:15:28 -0700, Fred J. McCall >><fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>> >>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>> >>>> >>>>Could you be any more vague? >>>> >>> >>>"Vague"? Do you not know what jewelry and such are? >>> >> >>Why on Earth would anyone print jewelry? Plastic jewelry? ...or are >>you going to print gold? BTW, I'd like to see you print hardened >>steel and water companies, too. >> > >Do try to keep up. The question was "what do people make at home?" >The question was not "What are people 3D-Printing at home?" You really do have a short attention span, don't you? Probably ADHD. > >That being said, why not? Where do you get the silly idea that >3D-printing only works for plastics? People are 3D-printing rocket >combustion chambers and you think 'hardened steel' is a problem? Do try to pay attention. Maybe if you took notes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-11 18:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b9uamc1avdful8sqmp30netmdeuog0bqv3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640038 |
krw@notreal.com wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:46:45 -0700, Fred J. McCall
><fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>krw@notreal.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:15:28 -0700, Fred J. McCall
>>><fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Could you be any more vague?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Vague"? Do you not know what jewelry and such are?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Why on Earth would anyone print jewelry? Plastic jewelry? ...or are
>>>you going to print gold? BTW, I'd like to see you print hardened
>>>steel and water companies, too.
>>>
>>
>>Do try to keep up. The question was "what do people make at home?"
>>The question was not "What are people 3D-Printing at home?"
>
>You really do have a short attention span, don't you? Probably ADHD.
Lack of content noted.
>>
>>That being said, why not? Where do you get the silly idea that
>>3D-printing only works for plastics? People are 3D-printing rocket
>>combustion chambers and you think 'hardened steel' is a problem?
>
>Do try to pay attention. Maybe if you took notes.
Lack of content noted.
--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-11 21:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <buuamcd10ukjfap5ohp071fqqmr5178jsj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640077 |
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:20:26 -0700, Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >krw@notreal.com wrote: > >>On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:46:45 -0700, Fred J. McCall >><fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>krw@notreal.com wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:15:28 -0700, Fred J. McCall >>>><fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Could you be any more vague? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>"Vague"? Do you not know what jewelry and such are? >>>>> >>>> >>>>Why on Earth would anyone print jewelry? Plastic jewelry? ...or are >>>>you going to print gold? BTW, I'd like to see you print hardened >>>>steel and water companies, too. >>>> >>> >>>Do try to keep up. The question was "what do people make at home?" >>>The question was not "What are people 3D-Printing at home?" >> >>You really do have a short attention span, don't you? Probably ADHD. > >Lack of content noted. You can't understand more. > >>> >>>That being said, why not? Where do you get the silly idea that >>>3D-printing only works for plastics? People are 3D-printing rocket >>>combustion chambers and you think 'hardened steel' is a problem? >> >>Do try to pay attention. Maybe if you took notes. > >Lack of content noted. You can't understand more.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-11 22:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <24vf3e-srm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #640005 |
In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:15:28 -0700, Fred J. McCall > <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > >>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>> >>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>> >>> >>>Could you be any more vague? >>> >> >>"Vague"? Do you not know what jewelry and such are? > > Why on Earth would anyone print jewelry? Plastic jewelry? ...or are > you going to print gold? BTW, I'd like to see you print hardened > steel and water companies, too. I can see a few, very few, people printing junk jewelry, mostly teenage girls. I can't see anyone printing an electric, gas, or water company. Tools and gadgets are so vague they are meaningless. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-11 19:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <kqlamclf8eem56537qcmtlg4al3lq9791f@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640034 |
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:12:50 -0000, the renowned jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >> On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:15:28 -0700, Fred J. McCall >> <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>> >>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>> >>>> >>>>Could you be any more vague? >>>> >>> >>>"Vague"? Do you not know what jewelry and such are? >> >> Why on Earth would anyone print jewelry? Plastic jewelry? ...or are >> you going to print gold? BTW, I'd like to see you print hardened >> steel and water companies, too. > >I can see a few, very few, people printing junk jewelry, mostly teenage >girls. 3D printing actually is quite useful as part of a bespoke jewellery-making process. You design a 3D model using a CAD program such as Jewelsmith, print a positive, then use investment casting to produce a one-time mold, which is used to mold precious metal. >I can't see anyone printing an electric, gas, or water company. > >Tools and gadgets are so vague they are meaningless. Tools? I just 3D-printed a fixture for stencil printing a PCB. It holds a small panel (snaps into the mounting holes) and has cutouts to allow the PCB to sit flat after parts have already been mounted on the other side. Crude but more than good enough. A machinist would have charged me perhaps $500 and taken days. And I would have gotten bogged down in toolpaths and cutter compensation and such like programming it myself in a CAM program. --sp -- Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-12 02:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <erdg3e-4bo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #640046 |
In sci.physics Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogdotyou.knowwhat> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:12:50 -0000, the renowned > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >>> On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:15:28 -0700, Fred J. McCall >>> <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>>In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>> >>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Could you be any more vague? >>>>> >>>> >>>>"Vague"? Do you not know what jewelry and such are? >>> >>> Why on Earth would anyone print jewelry? Plastic jewelry? ...or are >>> you going to print gold? BTW, I'd like to see you print hardened >>> steel and water companies, too. >> >>I can see a few, very few, people printing junk jewelry, mostly teenage >>girls. > > 3D printing actually is quite useful as part of a bespoke > jewellery-making process. You design a 3D model using a CAD program > such as Jewelsmith, print a positive, then use investment casting to > produce a one-time mold, which is used to mold precious metal. Yep, it will revolutionize the jewelry business... >>I can't see anyone printing an electric, gas, or water company. >> >>Tools and gadgets are so vague they are meaningless. > > Tools? I just 3D-printed a fixture for stencil printing a PCB. It > holds a small panel (snaps into the mounting holes) and has cutouts to > allow the PCB to sit flat after parts have already been mounted on the > other side. Crude but more than good enough. A machinist would have > charged me perhaps $500 and taken days. And I would have gotten bogged > down in toolpaths and cutter compensation and such like programming it > myself in a CAM program. > > --sp Something housewives across the continent have been clamoring for. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-11 22:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0ndbmc963sr1nb1ktj2djnctts4h2msjep@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640089 |
Guy's, give up. The Chimp's position is ALWAYS that nothing that hasn't already been done can possibly be done or have an impact on anything. He can't help it. He's a 1930's style bureaucrat. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogdotyou.knowwhat> wrote: >> On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:12:50 -0000, the renowned >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>> On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:15:28 -0700, Fred J. McCall >>>> <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Could you be any more vague? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>"Vague"? Do you not know what jewelry and such are? >>>> >>>> Why on Earth would anyone print jewelry? Plastic jewelry? ...or are >>>> you going to print gold? BTW, I'd like to see you print hardened >>>> steel and water companies, too. >>> >>>I can see a few, very few, people printing junk jewelry, mostly teenage >>>girls. >> >> 3D printing actually is quite useful as part of a bespoke >> jewellery-making process. You design a 3D model using a CAD program >> such as Jewelsmith, print a positive, then use investment casting to >> produce a one-time mold, which is used to mold precious metal. > >Yep, it will revolutionize the jewelry business... > >>>I can't see anyone printing an electric, gas, or water company. >>> >>>Tools and gadgets are so vague they are meaningless. >> >> Tools? I just 3D-printed a fixture for stencil printing a PCB. It >> holds a small panel (snaps into the mounting holes) and has cutouts to >> allow the PCB to sit flat after parts have already been mounted on the >> other side. Crude but more than good enough. A machinist would have >> charged me perhaps $500 and taken days. And I would have gotten bogged >> down in toolpaths and cutter compensation and such like programming it >> myself in a CAM program. >> > >Something housewives across the continent have been clamoring for. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-12 10:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ok5b7v$4ka$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #640046 |
"Spehro Pefhany" wrote in message news:kqlamclf8eem56537qcmtlg4al3lq9791f@4ax.com... ==================================================================== ... 3D printing actually is quite useful as part of a bespoke jewellery-making process. You design a 3D model using a CAD program such as Jewelsmith, print a positive, then use investment casting to produce a one-time mold, which is used to mold precious metal. >I can't see anyone printing an electric, gas, or water company. > >Tools and gadgets are so vague they are meaningless. Tools? I just 3D-printed a fixture for stencil printing a PCB. It holds a small panel (snaps into the mounting holes) and has cutouts to allow the PCB to sit flat after parts have already been mounted on the other side. Crude but more than good enough. A machinist would have charged me perhaps $500 and taken days. And I would have gotten bogged down in toolpaths and cutter compensation and such like programming it myself in a CAM program. --sp -- Best regards, Spehro Pefhany --- ==================================================================== Since it would have required a machinist I assume it was 3D-printed in metal? Who did the actual 3D-printing? Bob Clark ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, nanotechnology can now fulfill its potential to revolutionize 21st-century technology, from the space elevator, to private, orbital launchers, to 'flying cars'. This crowdfunding campaign is to prove it: Nanotech: from air to space. https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/nanotech-from-air-to-space/x/13319568/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-13 20:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <vi5gmc1nfdueenltjtsga0ovr3agn2sp4n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640166 |
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:24:38 -0400, "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> wrote: >"Spehro Pefhany" wrote in message >news:kqlamclf8eem56537qcmtlg4al3lq9791f@4ax.com... >==================================================================== >... >3D printing actually is quite useful as part of a bespoke >jewellery-making process. You design a 3D model using a CAD program >such as Jewelsmith, print a positive, then use investment casting to >produce a one-time mold, which is used to mold precious metal. No one said that 3D printers weren't useful. The argument is whether they'll take over traditional manufacturing. That is, everyone makes what they need at home, on their magic printer. > > >>I can't see anyone printing an electric, gas, or water company. >> >>Tools and gadgets are so vague they are meaningless. > >Tools? I just 3D-printed a fixture for stencil printing a PCB. It >holds a small panel (snaps into the mounting holes) and has cutouts to >allow the PCB to sit flat after parts have already been mounted on the >other side. Crude but more than good enough. A machinist would have >charged me perhaps $500 and taken days. And I would have gotten bogged >down in toolpaths and cutter compensation and such like programming it >myself in a CAM program. How many people in the US would *ever* have done such? I do this stuff too and would no more dream of printing a stencil than manufacturing my own PCBs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-13 23:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <vcogmc5jblo80dk30ren3tp1uc8dlnefam@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640394 |
krw@notreal.com wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:24:38 -0400, "Robert Clark"
><rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> wrote:
>
>>"Spehro Pefhany" wrote in message
>>news:kqlamclf8eem56537qcmtlg4al3lq9791f@4ax.com...
>>====================================================================
>>...
>>3D printing actually is quite useful as part of a bespoke
>>jewellery-making process. You design a 3D model using a CAD program
>>such as Jewelsmith, print a positive, then use investment casting to
>>produce a one-time mold, which is used to mold precious metal.
>
>No one said that 3D printers weren't useful. The argument is whether
>they'll take over traditional manufacturing. That is, everyone makes
>what they need at home, on their magic printer.
>
That is NOT the argument for most of us. The argument is whether they
are 'game changing' or not. Jimp the Chimp argues that they are niche
applications at best and will never be anything else. The
counter-argument is when you start listing niches and potential
niches, pretty soon you're changing the game in a lot of places.
--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 17:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <kleimcllla2ivhh7ddvhre2hfllp0su0lg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640424 |
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 23:17:55 -0700, Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >krw@notreal.com wrote: > >>On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:24:38 -0400, "Robert Clark" >><rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> wrote: >> >>>"Spehro Pefhany" wrote in message >>>news:kqlamclf8eem56537qcmtlg4al3lq9791f@4ax.com... >>>==================================================================== >>>... >>>3D printing actually is quite useful as part of a bespoke >>>jewellery-making process. You design a 3D model using a CAD program >>>such as Jewelsmith, print a positive, then use investment casting to >>>produce a one-time mold, which is used to mold precious metal. >> >>No one said that 3D printers weren't useful. The argument is whether >>they'll take over traditional manufacturing. That is, everyone makes >>what they need at home, on their magic printer. >> > >That is NOT the argument for most of us. The argument is whether they >are 'game changing' or not. Jimp the Chimp argues that they are niche >applications at best and will never be anything else. The >counter-argument is when you start listing niches and potential >niches, pretty soon you're changing the game in a lot of places. The "next industrial revolution" is a bit more than you pretend above. You're wrong.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 16:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0sjimc1vlte61k51a781gk3dd6fnl0sjm6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640522 |
krw@notreal.com wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 23:17:55 -0700, Fred J. McCall
><fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>krw@notreal.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:24:38 -0400, "Robert Clark"
>>><rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Spehro Pefhany" wrote in message
>>>>news:kqlamclf8eem56537qcmtlg4al3lq9791f@4ax.com...
>>>>====================================================================
>>>>...
>>>>3D printing actually is quite useful as part of a bespoke
>>>>jewellery-making process. You design a 3D model using a CAD program
>>>>such as Jewelsmith, print a positive, then use investment casting to
>>>>produce a one-time mold, which is used to mold precious metal.
>>>
>>>No one said that 3D printers weren't useful. The argument is whether
>>>they'll take over traditional manufacturing. That is, everyone makes
>>>what they need at home, on their magic printer.
>>>
>>
>>That is NOT the argument for most of us. The argument is whether they
>>are 'game changing' or not. Jimp the Chimp argues that they are niche
>>applications at best and will never be anything else. The
>>counter-argument is when you start listing niches and potential
>>niches, pretty soon you're changing the game in a lot of places.
>
>The "next industrial revolution" is a bit more than you pretend above.
>You're wrong.
>
Thank you, Assertions R Us.
--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-11 18:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4buamc9vu5gn16po04cv9pe4jcvv8g96n3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640034 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >> On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:15:28 -0700, Fred J. McCall >> <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>> >>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>> >>>> >>>>Could you be any more vague? >>>> >>> >>>"Vague"? Do you not know what jewelry and such are? >> >> Why on Earth would anyone print jewelry? Plastic jewelry? ...or are >> you going to print gold? BTW, I'd like to see you print hardened >> steel and water companies, too. > >I can see a few, very few, people printing junk jewelry, mostly teenage >girls. > >I can't see anyone printing an electric, gas, or water company. > >Tools and gadgets are so vague they are meaningless. > If you want to see a tool someone made at home, look in the mirror. -- You are What you do When it counts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-12 07:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.33cfd201d99e7be698998c@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #640034 |
In article <24vf3e-srm.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > > I can see a few, very few, people printing junk jewelry, mostly teenage > girls. Perhaps, but have you been to a craft store in the last 5 years? They've been selling commercial 2d robotic cutters for many years that are about the size of an ink-jet printer. The stupid thing shows absolutely no sign of stopping even though the "cartridges" which contain the cutting patterns are DRM protected and *very* expensive. They are mostly used by people who like to do scrap books, but others use them for making their own greeting cards and etc. In those same craft stores is a large jewelery making section. Those "memory bracelets" people make are a hot thing because "every item on it represents a memory". In other words, these things are already highly customized. So, I wouldn't discount the notion that the crafts stores might start selling very small 3d metal printers for making little dangling things for jewelery (memory bracelets, necklace charms, and etc.) since this would drop right into the market-space. They would only need to print at most 3" x 3" x 3" to cover 99% of the jewelery market. That same metal printer would sell "big league" at game stores where custom cast characters for board games are already a huge market. In other words Dungeons and Dragons, Warhammer 40k, and etc. Even if an individual player wouldn't want one, every damn game store on the planet would want at least a couple. Jeff -- All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone. These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends, employer, or any organization that I am a member of.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-12 05:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1a4cmc59ntnatnq8b77fn7v1dn8uo02e7m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #640146 |
Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: >In article <24vf3e-srm.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >says... >> >> >> I can see a few, very few, people printing junk jewelry, mostly teenage >> girls. > >Perhaps, but have you been to a craft store in the last 5 years? >They've been selling commercial 2d robotic cutters for many years that >are about the size of an ink-jet printer. The stupid thing shows >absolutely no sign of stopping even though the "cartridges" which >contain the cutting patterns are DRM protected and *very* expensive. >They are mostly used by people who like to do scrap books, but others >use them for making their own greeting cards and etc. > >In those same craft stores is a large jewelery making section. Those >"memory bracelets" people make are a hot thing because "every item on it >represents a memory". In other words, these things are already highly >customized. > >So, I wouldn't discount the notion that the crafts stores might start >selling very small 3d metal printers for making little dangling things >for jewelery (memory bracelets, necklace charms, and etc.) since this >would drop right into the market-space. They would only need to print >at most 3" x 3" x 3" to cover 99% of the jewelery market. > >That same metal printer would sell "big league" at game stores where >custom cast characters for board games are already a huge market. In >other words Dungeons and Dragons, Warhammer 40k, and etc. Even if an >individual player wouldn't want one, every damn game store on the planet >would want at least a couple. > Any bets on what his response will be, Jeff? I'm betting it will include the word 'niche', 'crap', or both. You see, the entire world falls in those categories unless it is something we've been doing since the 1930s... -- You are What you do When it counts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-12 17:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6r3i3e-7r.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #640146 |
In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: > In article <24vf3e-srm.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > says... >> >> >> I can see a few, very few, people printing junk jewelry, mostly teenage >> girls. > > Perhaps, but have you been to a craft store in the last 5 years? > They've been selling commercial 2d robotic cutters for many years that > are about the size of an ink-jet printer. The stupid thing shows > absolutely no sign of stopping even though the "cartridges" which > contain the cutting patterns are DRM protected and *very* expensive. > They are mostly used by people who like to do scrap books, but others > use them for making their own greeting cards and etc. > > In those same craft stores is a large jewelery making section. Those > "memory bracelets" people make are a hot thing because "every item on it > represents a memory". In other words, these things are already highly > customized. > > So, I wouldn't discount the notion that the crafts stores might start > selling very small 3d metal printers for making little dangling things > for jewelery (memory bracelets, necklace charms, and etc.) since this > would drop right into the market-space. They would only need to print > at most 3" x 3" x 3" to cover 99% of the jewelery market. > > That same metal printer would sell "big league" at game stores where > custom cast characters for board games are already a huge market. In > other words Dungeons and Dragons, Warhammer 40k, and etc. Even if an > individual player wouldn't want one, every damn game store on the planet > would want at least a couple. > > Jeff By those standards black powder firearms will take over the firearms world. I'm not saying there is not and will not be a bunch of niche users of 3D printing. What I am saying is that 3D printing is not going to be the next industrial revolution. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-12 18:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ok6bv6$3a4$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #640198 |
On 7/12/2017 12:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: >> In article <24vf3e-srm.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >> says... >>> >>> >>> I can see a few, very few, people printing junk jewelry, mostly teenage >>> girls. >> >> Perhaps, but have you been to a craft store in the last 5 years? >> They've been selling commercial 2d robotic cutters for many years that >> are about the size of an ink-jet printer. The stupid thing shows >> absolutely no sign of stopping even though the "cartridges" which >> contain the cutting patterns are DRM protected and *very* expensive. >> They are mostly used by people who like to do scrap books, but others >> use them for making their own greeting cards and etc. >> >> In those same craft stores is a large jewelery making section. Those >> "memory bracelets" people make are a hot thing because "every item on it >> represents a memory". In other words, these things are already highly >> customized. >> >> So, I wouldn't discount the notion that the crafts stores might start >> selling very small 3d metal printers for making little dangling things >> for jewelery (memory bracelets, necklace charms, and etc.) since this >> would drop right into the market-space. They would only need to print >> at most 3" x 3" x 3" to cover 99% of the jewelery market. >> That same metal printer would sell "big league" at game stores where >> custom cast characters for board games are already a huge market. In >> other words Dungeons and Dragons, Warhammer 40k, and etc. Even if an >> individual player wouldn't want one, every damn game store on the planet >> would want at least a couple. >> >> Jeff > > By those standards black powder firearms will take over the firearms world. > > I'm not saying there is not and will not be a bunch of niche users of > 3D printing. > > What I am saying is that 3D printing is not going to be the next industrial > revolution. > > major limitation is, one cannot "print" higher melting temp material on lower melting point material.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 17 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web