Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #551058 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-07 10:09 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-02-17 04:05 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 366 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-02-07 10:09 -0600
Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 08:21 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sergio <imvalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-07 10:38 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 ˌsōlər ˈpleksəs <solar@plexus.org> - 2016-02-07 17:15 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 12:36 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 12:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-07 08:33 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-02-08 01:35 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 03:48 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 09:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-08 13:45 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 21:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 06:56 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:30 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-17 02:27 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:04 -0600
whOOsh noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:03 -0800
Re: whOOsh noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 11:46 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 12:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-07 20:28 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 13:53 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-07 21:58 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 18:51 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-09 22:35 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 18:24 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 21:36 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 15:00 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 23:05 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 16:25 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-11 07:54 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:56 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 22:58 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 18:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 18:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 04:00 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-12 20:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 04:28 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-13 08:42 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 14:50 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-14 21:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-15 01:37 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 04:41 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 11:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 13:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 18:21 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:24 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 19:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:07 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 09:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-16 14:54 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:22 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-17 02:43 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 01:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 13:20 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 14:04 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-17 19:30 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 23:10 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:51 -0600
ha, yummy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 13:42 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 13:16 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 14:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-17 19:11 +0000
lunarstuff; who wasn't really theresville noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 14:32 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:51 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:03 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:18 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 13:14 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-17 22:46 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:50 -0600
misson implausibly noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 16:27 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 19:10 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 11:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:25 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 19:12 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:08 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 13:59 +1100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 01:15 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:08 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:04 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 10:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:49 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:56 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 04:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 20:08 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 15:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 21:43 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-13 19:50 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 14:52 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 04:56 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:24 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Guess Who <don'temailme@youputz.cpom> - 2016-02-13 15:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-13 16:02 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-13 21:22 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:24 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-16 08:24 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-17 06:08 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 16:19 +1100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 11:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:49 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-18 10:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-18 20:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:42 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-19 10:44 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 17:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 15:28 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 17:29 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 16:51 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 15:02 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 00:58 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 18:52 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-08 02:26 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 03:48 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 17:34 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:54 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 17:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 00:48 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:15 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:42 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 17:32 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 18:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-14 17:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:20 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 22:15 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:12 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:46 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 18:27 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 20:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:35 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 13:07 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-10 18:09 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:59 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:43 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 19:13 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 12:57 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:58 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-12 12:15 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 04:28 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:47 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:21 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 16:56 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:17 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 06:28 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:50 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:20 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:39 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-12 15:24 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 19:29 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 09:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:16 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:05 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 12:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:17 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:41 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:43 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-08 18:26 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 14:13 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 17:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 18:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 00:50 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 22:24 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-10 17:50 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 13:04 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-11 14:53 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 07:07 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 07:40 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 08:34 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 09:13 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 09:41 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 10:01 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 14:37 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 14:25 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 13:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 13:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 13:05 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 11:35 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 19:38 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 18:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 07:00 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 10:26 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 15:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 13:10 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 13:47 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:29 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 16:20 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 17:15 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 01:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-12 14:13 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 13:07 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 18:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 07:04 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 13:59 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 00:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-11 02:36 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 23:23 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 00:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-11 22:24 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-12 12:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-13 16:42 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:21 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:49 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 13:08 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 09:04 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 16:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 17:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:56 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:55 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:50 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:49 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:20 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 17:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:26 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-16 01:30 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:02 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 01:11 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:08 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:50 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-08 04:59 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 14:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 17:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:42 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sergio <imvalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-08 16:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 09:10 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:07 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-13 11:41 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:58 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 00:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 13:53 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:46 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:18 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 12:54 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 05:20 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 05:27 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 11:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:27 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-13 11:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 13:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 02:41 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:06 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:29 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Heiðr Einherjar <einherjar@notformail.org> - 2016-02-08 16:49 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 13:53 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 13:22 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 15:30 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:00 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 22:10 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 21:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:18 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:47 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 04:26 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 04:37 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 04:51 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 17:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 01:01 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 21:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 18:49 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:58 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 22:20 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 18:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:58 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:32 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:06 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-07 17:19 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 17:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-07 19:28 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:37 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-08 12:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 12:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-09 17:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 18:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-10 03:18 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-10 11:56 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-10 11:55 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 12:57 +1100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 03:47 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 09:02 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:05 -0600
Page 5 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 19 Next page →
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 01:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.312c888684f5111d98c51d@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #553470 |
In article <b345cb5ea1tpulmtcjdskiajjknopd90r1@4ax.com>, gov.shill@gmail.com says... > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:25:27 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:46:00 -0500, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > >wrote: > > > >>In article <5463cb1hiae3q93m5enss49uhl1lqhi52u@4ax.com>, > >>compuelf@gmail.com says... > >>> > >>> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:39:35 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> >Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >>> >> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 08:42:54 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >>> I can't see 4 or 5 of you actually sharing one brain. > >>> >>> ...And know who might have use of it today. > >>> >>> So it makes sense that I might be confused about which personality I > >>> >>> might have reached today > >>> >> > >>> >> Another example of Bast's mental illness(es). > >>> > > >>> >Awwww, You didn't like that one ? > >>> >Here.....Try this one. > >>> > > >>> >Secret Moon - NASA fake moon and mars hoax PROVEN > >>> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNxxzEIzDVU > >>> > >>> When footage from the simulation is shown, but not stated to be > >>> such, the whole of the work loses all credibility. > >>> Got anything VALID to present? > >>> I didn't think so. > >> > >>How do people as stupid, gullible, and crazy as Bast not get everything > >>swindled from them by some phone scam, or Nigerian oil tycoon's lawyer? > > > > I suspect, but can't know, Bast isn't smart enough to fall for > >such scams. Enough intellect to see the potential for making money is > >required. > > > > I'd write more, but I need to send $1500 via Western Union to a > >guy in Nigeria. I won the national lottery but they need some advance > >fees paid. I'm so buying new Tupperware with my winnings! > > > >[Note to Bast and other intellectually challenged readers: I'm not > >being serious.] > > http://www.iflscience.com/space/scam-email-about-nigerian-astronaut-lost-space-hilarious > > Shill #2 If Bast had that kind of money, I'm sure she would bite. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 04:08 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <59t5cb1vgqpkrivqce5uldd9b7lviku5l0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #553470 |
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:59:11 +1100, Government Shill #2
<gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:25:27 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:46:00 -0500, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>In article <5463cb1hiae3q93m5enss49uhl1lqhi52u@4ax.com>,
>>>compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:39:35 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>>> >> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 08:42:54 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> I can't see 4 or 5 of you actually sharing one brain.
>>>> >>> ...And know who might have use of it today.
>>>> >>> So it makes sense that I might be confused about which personality I
>>>> >>> might have reached today
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Another example of Bast's mental illness(es).
>>>> >
>>>> >Awwww, You didn't like that one ?
>>>> >Here.....Try this one.
>>>> >
>>>> >Secret Moon - NASA fake moon and mars hoax PROVEN
>>>> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNxxzEIzDVU
>>>>
>>>> When footage from the simulation is shown, but not stated to be
>>>> such, the whole of the work loses all credibility.
>>>> Got anything VALID to present?
>>>> I didn't think so.
>>>
>>>How do people as stupid, gullible, and crazy as Bast not get everything
>>>swindled from them by some phone scam, or Nigerian oil tycoon's lawyer?
>>
>> I suspect, but can't know, Bast isn't smart enough to fall for
>>such scams. Enough intellect to see the potential for making money is
>>required.
>>
>> I'd write more, but I need to send $1500 via Western Union to a
>>guy in Nigeria. I won the national lottery but they need some advance
>>fees paid. I'm so buying new Tupperware with my winnings!
>>
>>[Note to Bast and other intellectually challenged readers: I'm not
>>being serious.]
>
>http://www.iflscience.com/space/scam-email-about-nigerian-astronaut-lost-space-hilarious
Wow. I wonder if anyone ever actually fell for that one.
Statistically speaking, someone has, but I'd enjoy seeing some actual
data about it.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 15:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.312d4ff72b9046d498c521@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #553500 |
In article <59t5cb1vgqpkrivqce5uldd9b7lviku5l0@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:59:11 +1100, Government Shill #2 > <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:25:27 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> > >wrote: > > > >>On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:46:00 -0500, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > >>wrote: > >> > >>>In article <5463cb1hiae3q93m5enss49uhl1lqhi52u@4ax.com>, > >>>compuelf@gmail.com says... > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:39:35 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> >Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >>>> >> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 08:42:54 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >>>> >> wrote: > >>>> >> > >>>> >>> I can't see 4 or 5 of you actually sharing one brain. > >>>> >>> ...And know who might have use of it today. > >>>> >>> So it makes sense that I might be confused about which personality I > >>>> >>> might have reached today > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Another example of Bast's mental illness(es). > >>>> > > >>>> >Awwww, You didn't like that one ? > >>>> >Here.....Try this one. > >>>> > > >>>> >Secret Moon - NASA fake moon and mars hoax PROVEN > >>>> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNxxzEIzDVU > >>>> > >>>> When footage from the simulation is shown, but not stated to be > >>>> such, the whole of the work loses all credibility. > >>>> Got anything VALID to present? > >>>> I didn't think so. > >>> > >>>How do people as stupid, gullible, and crazy as Bast not get everything > >>>swindled from them by some phone scam, or Nigerian oil tycoon's lawyer? > >> > >> I suspect, but can't know, Bast isn't smart enough to fall for > >>such scams. Enough intellect to see the potential for making money is > >>required. > >> > >> I'd write more, but I need to send $1500 via Western Union to a > >>guy in Nigeria. I won the national lottery but they need some advance > >>fees paid. I'm so buying new Tupperware with my winnings! > >> > >>[Note to Bast and other intellectually challenged readers: I'm not > >>being serious.] > > > >http://www.iflscience.com/space/scam-email-about-nigerian-astronaut-lost-space-hilarious > > Wow. I wonder if anyone ever actually fell for that one. > Statistically speaking, someone has, but I'd enjoy seeing some actual > data about it. I hope not, but having seen people on TV who have been scammed by such obvious BS artists, I have to think someone actually has fallen for it. Someone like Bast.. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 04:04 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <tbh8cb53uj5p9trgem3ga4ec75lbt448b6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #553608 |
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:26:16 -0500, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:
[...]
>> >> I'd write more, but I need to send $1500 via Western Union to a
>> >>guy in Nigeria. I won the national lottery but they need some advance
>> >>fees paid. I'm so buying new Tupperware with my winnings!
>> >>
>> >>[Note to Bast and other intellectually challenged readers: I'm not
>> >>being serious.]
>> >
>> >http://www.iflscience.com/space/scam-email-about-nigerian-astronaut-lost-space-hilarious
>>
>> Wow. I wonder if anyone ever actually fell for that one.
>> Statistically speaking, someone has, but I'd enjoy seeing some actual
>> data about it.
>
>I hope not, but having seen people on TV who have been scammed by such
>obvious BS artists, I have to think someone actually has fallen for it.
>
>Someone like Bast..
Statistically speaking, someone has fallen for it. People like
Bast wouldn't be able to afford to be scammed by this one. Plus she
would lack the intellect to see the perceived potential for a massive
profit.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 10:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.312e61cbe4c096a698c523@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #553805 |
In article <tbh8cb53uj5p9trgem3ga4ec75lbt448b6@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:26:16 -0500, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > wrote: > > [...] > > >> >> I'd write more, but I need to send $1500 via Western Union to a > >> >>guy in Nigeria. I won the national lottery but they need some advance > >> >>fees paid. I'm so buying new Tupperware with my winnings! > >> >> > >> >>[Note to Bast and other intellectually challenged readers: I'm not > >> >>being serious.] > >> > > >> >http://www.iflscience.com/space/scam-email-about-nigerian-astronaut-lost-space-hilarious > >> > >> Wow. I wonder if anyone ever actually fell for that one. > >> Statistically speaking, someone has, but I'd enjoy seeing some actual > >> data about it. > > > >I hope not, but having seen people on TV who have been scammed by such > >obvious BS artists, I have to think someone actually has fallen for it. > > > >Someone like Bast.. > > Statistically speaking, someone has fallen for it. People like > Bast wouldn't be able to afford to be scammed by this one. Plus she > would lack the intellect to see the perceived potential for a massive > profit. Look how the whackjobs are claiming Scalia was murdered...there's no limit to the kOOktardery they will buy into. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 03:49 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <gr4bcb997kb26468bl4gooiqssgve9iqjb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #553885 |
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:54:39 -0500, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:
>In article <tbh8cb53uj5p9trgem3ga4ec75lbt448b6@4ax.com>,
>compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:26:16 -0500, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >> >> I'd write more, but I need to send $1500 via Western Union to a
>> >> >>guy in Nigeria. I won the national lottery but they need some advance
>> >> >>fees paid. I'm so buying new Tupperware with my winnings!
>> >> >>
>> >> >>[Note to Bast and other intellectually challenged readers: I'm not
>> >> >>being serious.]
>> >> >
>> >> >http://www.iflscience.com/space/scam-email-about-nigerian-astronaut-lost-space-hilarious
>> >>
>> >> Wow. I wonder if anyone ever actually fell for that one.
>> >> Statistically speaking, someone has, but I'd enjoy seeing some actual
>> >> data about it.
>> >
>> >I hope not, but having seen people on TV who have been scammed by such
>> >obvious BS artists, I have to think someone actually has fallen for it.
>> >
>> >Someone like Bast..
>>
>> Statistically speaking, someone has fallen for it. People like
>> Bast wouldn't be able to afford to be scammed by this one. Plus she
>> would lack the intellect to see the perceived potential for a massive
>> profit.
>
>Look how the whackjobs are claiming Scalia was murdered...there's no
>limit to the kOOktardery they will buy into.
Because an obese 79 year old man couldn't possibly die of
anything other than foul play.
I wonder if there is anything a k00k won't accept.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-14 20:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lvb2cblvvfom4h65evla9rnq002rtkdagg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #552762 |
On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 04:28:31 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 20:19:52 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >wrote: > >>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:58:50 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn >>> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >>> >>>> Sarah Ehrett trolled: >>>> >>>>> [.] >>>> >>>> *PLONK* >>>> >>>> >>>> F'up2 poster >>>> >>>> PointedEars >>> >>> Sarah must have really made you look bad. >> >> >>No dummy. >>People just have no tollerance for your stupidity and leave. >> > > Whereas I'm not Sarah, your lie fails. On several levels. > >>....So go back to wanking off to CNN >> > > How is that whole ignoring my posts thing working out for you? Bast exhibits all the traits of alcohol and drug abuse. She fits the criteria for a schizophrenic type disorder. Schizotypal personality disorder (STPD) or schizotypal disorder is a mental disorder characterized by severe social anxiety, paranoia, and often unconventional beliefs. < snip> In some cases, people with STPD may react oddly in conversations, not respond, or talk to themselves.[1] They frequently misinterpret situations as being strange or having unusual meaning for them; paranormal and superstitious beliefs are common.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 03:23 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n763cb5uuqqtr7nork8blu7ibuevmsipjt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #553236 |
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 20:56:29 -0500, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:
>On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 04:28:31 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 20:19:52 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:58:50 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
>>>> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sarah Ehrett trolled:
>>>>>
>>>>>> [.]
>>>>>
>>>>> *PLONK*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> F'up2 poster
>>>>>
>>>>> PointedEars
>>>>
>>>> Sarah must have really made you look bad.
>>>
>>>No dummy.
>>>People just have no tollerance for your stupidity and leave.
>>
>> Whereas I'm not Sarah, your lie fails. On several levels.
>>
>>>....So go back to wanking off to CNN
>>
>> How is that whole ignoring my posts thing working out for you?
>
>Bast exhibits all the traits of alcohol and drug abuse. She fits the
>criteria for a schizophrenic type disorder.
>
Without a personal interview, I can't state that she is
schizophrenic, but I can't rule it out.
It's worth noting I'm not actually qualified to make such a
determination even if I were to met her in real life and analyze her.
>Schizotypal personality disorder (STPD) or schizotypal disorder is a
>mental disorder characterized by severe social anxiety, paranoia, and
>often unconventional beliefs. < snip> In some cases, people with
>STPD may react oddly in conversations, not respond, or talk to
>themselves.[1] They frequently misinterpret situations as being
>strange or having unusual meaning for them; paranormal and
>superstitious beliefs are common.
Bast's posts are consistent with what you've supplied, but it's
not enough for a definitive diagnosis. It is enough to wonder about
her present mental health.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 04:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9s6ob$ud$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #553236 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 04:28:31 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)" > <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 20:19:52 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:58:50 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn >>>> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sarah Ehrett trolled: >>>>> >>>>>> [.] >>>>> >>>>> *PLONK* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> F'up2 poster >>>>> >>>>> PointedEars >>>> >>>> Sarah must have really made you look bad. >>> >>> >>> No dummy. >>> People just have no tollerance for your stupidity and leave. >>> >> >> Whereas I'm not Sarah, your lie fails. On several levels. >> >>> ....So go back to wanking off to CNN >>> >> >> How is that whole ignoring my posts thing working out for you? > > Bast exhibits all the traits of alcohol and drug abuse. She fits the > criteria for a schizophrenic type disorder. > > Schizotypal personality disorder (STPD) or schizotypal disorder is a > mental disorder characterized by severe social anxiety, paranoia, and > often unconventional beliefs. < snip> In some cases, people with > STPD may react oddly in conversations, not respond, or talk to > themselves.[1] They frequently misinterpret situations as being > strange or having unusual meaning for them; paranormal and > superstitious beliefs are common. Oooooooh, how offical sounding, and you used big words and everything. Did you look that up on the web or copy it from your medical report ? ....Have a cookie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ua7lbbpf1o7l1m4qni77pt1uj1bojs3om2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #551800 |
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 22:35:43 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
<PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 07 Feb 2016 21:58:47 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
>> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>
>Attribution line, not attribution novel.
>
You are presenting that I didn't trim the attributions. Is there
a specific reason for your dishonesty in this matter?
If anyone reading would like to confirm that you're being less
than honest, they only need to check
Message-ID: <2jpfbbtm987eitvgi6a6j0s0g54nfltn3l@4ax.com>.
>>>And you really should have set Followup-To.
>>
>> I replied to the same groups Thomas did. Just as I've done with
>> this reply to your post.
>
>*I* am Thomas, and it is inappropriate to crosspost
>
You are *a* Thomas. To suggest you are the only one is, at best,
misleading.
The post I replied to, that began our sub-conversation, was from
Thomas Hege. You, and anyone else with an interest, may verify this by
checking Message-ID: <q58fbb5beh40n9dh0ooja6g2hggp8gliv6@4ax.com>
>- across top-level hierarchies
>- across unrelated newsgroups
>
>without Followup-To like you did.
>
I hope you realize you are under no obligation to read, or reply
to, any of my posts.
>>> […]
>>> PointedEars
>>
>> I like the nym.
>
>Thanks, but that my nickname, not a pseudonym.
>
Really? People actually call you "PointedEars?" While I can't
declare it impossible, it seems an oddity to me.
I would expect people to call you Tom. But since I don't know you
in real life, and even if verifying your claim were realistically
possible, I don't care much.
>
>F'up2 alt.conspiracy
>
>PointedEars
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-10 20:08 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <5670035.juVVAO0mAZ@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #551974 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote: >> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>> On Sun, 07 Feb 2016 21:58:47 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn >>> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >> >>Attribution line, not attribution novel. >> > > You are presenting that I didn't trim the attributions. No, I am saying that the attribution that your newsreader added and that you posted as-is, is too long. It became too long and, to keep within 80 characters, was automatically extended to another line, because it contains superfluous information, namely the date of posting of the precursor and the e-mail address of the author of the precursor. You can see when comparing against the trimmed version above. It is superfluous information because if necessary it can be retrieved from the original posting and does not add value regarding the association of an author with the quotation (which is the purpose of an attribution line). > Is there > a specific reason for your dishonesty in this matter? There is no dishonesty on my part. There is, at best, a misunderstanding on yours. > […] >>>>And you really should have set Followup-To. >>> >>> I replied to the same groups Thomas did. Just as I've done with >>> this reply to your post. >> >>*I* am Thomas, and it is inappropriate to crosspost > > You are *a* Thomas. To suggest you are the only one is, at best, > misleading. I did not do that. > The post I replied to, that began our sub-conversation, was from > Thomas Hege. […] _Heger_ ACK. I did not think of that. Regardless, his crosspost was inappropriate in the first place. You should either not have continued it (AISB, crossposting over top-level hierarchies is bad, crossposting over Big 8 and alt.ALL is even worse), or set Followup- To to the newsgroup where the discussion is most on-topic (I suggested alt.conspiracy). >>- across top-level hierarchies >>- across unrelated newsgroups >> >>without Followup-To like you did. > > I hope you realize you are under no obligation to read, or reply > to, any of my posts. That does not make your negligence better in any way. >>>> [ ] >>>> PointedEars >>> >>> I like the nym. >> >>Thanks, but that my nickname, not a pseudonym. > > Really? People actually call you "PointedEars?" On the Net, yes. > While I can't > declare it impossible, it seems an oddity to me. It is customary to have a nickname on the Net. > I would expect people to call you Tom. IRL, people who know me well call me “Thomas” as I prefer that over the alternatives. > But since I don't know you > in real life, I was not referring to real life, of course. > and even if verifying your claim were realistically possible, It should be obvious that my nickname is not a pseudonym. Were it a pseudonym, I would not put it between my first and last name (as, again, it is customary), but I would only post as “PointedEars”. It is in fact very easy to verify that the words to the left and the right of my nickname are my first and last name, respectively. > I don't care much. I can see that. Score adjusted. F'up2 poster PointedEars -- Q: What did the nuclear physicist order for lunch? A: Fission chips. (from: WolframAlpha)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-10 15:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <o87nbbhfh8e8or3i42ddrg93ib6m6bnbhi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #552070 |
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 20:08:28 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: <flush f'ed up boring crap> >Regardless, his crosspost was inappropriate in the first place. You should >either not have continued it (AISB, crossposting over top-level hierarchies >is bad, crossposting over Big 8 and alt.ALL is even worse), or set Followup- >To to the newsgroup where the discussion is most on-topic (I suggested >alt.conspiracy). And you didn't do either, PointedEars. You crosspost to three newsgroups and didn't set your Follow-up to what you guessed might be an on topic newsgroup. Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics How inappropriate, never mind face plant stupid, of you to crosspost while whining about crossposting. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-10 21:43 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <2496330.HsUOYTbOms@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #552088 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 20:08:28 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn > <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: > > <flush f'ed up boring crap> > >>Regardless, his crosspost was inappropriate in the first place. You >>should either not have continued it (AISB, crossposting over top-level >>hierarchies is bad, crossposting over Big 8 and alt.ALL is even worse), or >>set Followup- To to the newsgroup where the discussion is most on-topic (I >>suggested alt.conspiracy). > > And you didn't do either, PointedEars. You crosspost to three > newsgroups and didn't set your Follow-up to what you guessed might be > an on topic newsgroup. […] Because there was none (the subject of the discussion had changed to be myself), so I set in the header and announced at the bottom of the body of my posting “Followup-To (F'up2) poster”, which means that replies should be sent to me only, via the e-mail address in the “Reply-To” header field. And I am rather certain that your news client application (Forte Agent 2.0/32.652) has told you so when you tried to post your follow-up. That and the rest of your posting (not quoted here) was impolite, to say the least. Please do not do that again; otherwise I will have to consider adding you to my killfile, with a “troll” tag attached. F'up2 poster (again) PointedEars -- Q: Who's on the case when the electricity goes out? A: Sherlock Ohms. (from: WolframAlpha)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-10 16:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <v7cnbblbpu2ctk6ef4pjd6s34nuepskt58@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #552091 |
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 21:43:14 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 20:08:28 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn >> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >> >> <flush f'ed up boring crap> >> >>>Regardless, his crosspost was inappropriate in the first place. You >>>should either not have continued it (AISB, crossposting over top-level >>>hierarchies is bad, crossposting over Big 8 and alt.ALL is even worse), or >>>set Followup- To to the newsgroup where the discussion is most on-topic (I >>>suggested alt.conspiracy). >> >> And you didn't do either, PointedEars. You crosspost to three >> newsgroups and didn't set your Follow-up to what you guessed might be >> an on topic newsgroup. […] Re added: Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics How inappropriate, never mind face plant stupid, of you to crosspost while whining about crossposting. >Because there was none (the subject of the discussion had changed to be >myself), so I set in the header and announced at the bottom of the body of >my posting “Followup-To (F'up2) poster”, which means that replies should be >sent to me only, via the e-mail address in the “Reply-To” header field. >And I am rather certain that your news client application (Forte Agent >2.0/32.652) has told you so when you tried to post your follow-up. And here you are still crossposting. Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics On which one of those groups do you participate in the discussions? Let's redouble the *face plant stupid* for you to continue to crosspost while whining about crossposting. >That and the rest of your posting (not quoted here) was impolite, to say the >least. I'm beginning to think a brink bat might be needed for you to get the point. >Please do not do that again; otherwise I will have to consider >adding you to my killfile, with a “troll” tag attached. Since you haven't a clue about much else regarding newsgroups I haven't much hope that your addled mind can figure out how to work a kill filter. But in case ..... Au Revoir CrossedEyesPointedEars. Or maybe that should be CrossedEyesDopeyStupid. Yes? LOL >F'up2 poster (again) >PointedEars
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-10 16:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5kbnbb9fnjsc5asv1lmm7hek9r2pvd74gg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #551974 |
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 04:41:15 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 22:35:43 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn ><PointedEars@web.de> wrote: > >>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 07 Feb 2016 21:58:47 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn >>> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >> >>Attribution line, not attribution novel. >> > > You are presenting that I didn't trim the attributions. Is there >a specific reason for your dishonesty in this matter? > If anyone reading would like to confirm that you're being less >than honest, they only need to check >Message-ID: <2jpfbbtm987eitvgi6a6j0s0g54nfltn3l@4ax.com>. > >>>>And you really should have set Followup-To. >>> >>> I replied to the same groups Thomas did. Just as I've done with >>> this reply to your post. >> >>*I* am Thomas, and it is inappropriate to crosspost >> > > You are *a* Thomas. To suggest you are the only one is, at best, >misleading. > The post I replied to, that began our sub-conversation, was from >Thomas Hege. You, and anyone else with an interest, may verify this by >checking Message-ID: <q58fbb5beh40n9dh0ooja6g2hggp8gliv6@4ax.com> > >>- across top-level hierarchies >>- across unrelated newsgroups >> >>without Followup-To like you did. >> > > I hope you realize you are under no obligation to read, or reply >to, any of my posts. > >>>> […] >>>> PointedEars >>> >>> I like the nym. >> >>Thanks, but that my nickname, not a pseudonym. >> > > Really? People actually call you "PointedEars?" While I can't >declare it impossible, it seems an oddity to me. > I would expect people to call you Tom. But since I don't know you >in real life, and even if verifying your claim were realistically >possible, I don't care much. > >> >>F'up2 alt.conspiracy >> >>PointedEars Pointy Ears is waaay to obsessed with his perceived importance.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <mnmobbln2h41f87l21j06k9iuveh3tgdu5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #552100 |
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:43:48 -0500, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 04:41:15 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 22:35:43 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
>><PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>>
>>>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 07 Feb 2016 21:58:47 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
>>>> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>Attribution line, not attribution novel.
>>
>> You are presenting that I didn't trim the attributions. Is there
>>a specific reason for your dishonesty in this matter?
>> If anyone reading would like to confirm that you're being less
>>than honest, they only need to check
>>Message-ID: <2jpfbbtm987eitvgi6a6j0s0g54nfltn3l@4ax.com>.
>>
>>>>>And you really should have set Followup-To.
>>>>
>>>> I replied to the same groups Thomas did. Just as I've done with
>>>> this reply to your post.
>>>
>>>*I* am Thomas, and it is inappropriate to crosspost
>>
>> You are *a* Thomas. To suggest you are the only one is, at best,
>>misleading.
>> The post I replied to, that began our sub-conversation, was from
>>Thomas Hege. You, and anyone else with an interest, may verify this by
>>checking Message-ID: <q58fbb5beh40n9dh0ooja6g2hggp8gliv6@4ax.com>
>>
>>>- across top-level hierarchies
>>>- across unrelated newsgroups
>>>
>>>without Followup-To like you did.
>>
>> I hope you realize you are under no obligation to read, or reply
>>to, any of my posts.
>>
>>>>> […]
>>>>> PointedEars
>>>>
>>>> I like the nym.
>>>
>>>Thanks, but that my nickname, not a pseudonym.
>>
>> Really? People actually call you "PointedEars?" While I can't
>>declare it impossible, it seems an oddity to me.
>> I would expect people to call you Tom. But since I don't know you
>>in real life, and even if verifying your claim were realistically
>>possible, I don't care much.
>>
>>>F'up2 alt.conspiracy
>>>
>>>PointedEars
>
>Pointy Ears is waaay to obsessed with his perceived importance.
I find his hypocrisy the most entertaining. As you've already
pointed out, he complains about cross-posting while cross-posting.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-13 19:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <18452642.YenfFz5V2c@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #552207 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > I find his hypocrisy the most entertaining. As you've already > pointed out, he complains about cross-posting while cross-posting. To spell it out for the intellectually challenged: There is a difference between crossposting *without* “Followup-To” header field (which the both of you continue to do), and crossposting *with* “Followup-To” header field (which I do). The latter attempts *to put a stop to further crossposting* as a working newsreader would then, on attempt to post a follow-up to such a message, either suggest posting *only* to the *one* newsgroup specified in the precursor’s “Followup-To” header field value, or send an e-mail to the precursor’s author if “poster“ was specified as the field value. <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5536#section-3.2.6> F'up2 poster (again) PointedEars -- Q: What did the nuclear physicist post on the laboratory door when he went camping? A: 'Gone fission'. (from: WolframAlpha)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-13 14:52 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <sq5vbbtin35g8m46v924u20468mri90hpk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #552849 |
On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 19:50:50 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
<PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>
>> I find his hypocrisy the most entertaining. As you've already
>> pointed out, he complains about cross-posting while cross-posting.
>
>To spell it out for the intellectually challenged:
>
You're not THAT bad off.
>There is a difference between crossposting *without* “Followup-To” header
>field (which the both of you continue to do), and crossposting *with*
>“Followup-To” header field (which I do). The latter attempts *to put a stop
>to further crossposting* as a working newsreader would then, on attempt to
>post a follow-up to such a message, either suggest posting *only* to the
>*one* newsgroup specified in the precursor’s “Followup-To” header field
>value, or send an e-mail to the precursor’s author if “poster“ was specified
>as the field value.
>
><http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5536#section-3.2.6>
>
You may try to justify your hypocrisy in any manner you so
desire. I don't think you'll ever enjoy much success. But you weren't
really out much for trying.
For whatever reason, you want the discussion to be limited to
E-mail. It should be clear that neither Sarah nor I are willing to do
that.
>
>F'up2 poster (again)
>
And disregarded (again).
>PointedEars
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 04:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9s766$2c1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #552945 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 19:50:50 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn > <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: > >> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >> >>> I find his hypocrisy the most entertaining. As you've already >>> pointed out, he complains about cross-posting while cross-posting. >> >> To spell it out for the intellectually challenged: >> > > You're not THAT bad off. What, you talkin' bout Willis ? He may not be that bad off, but you sure need it dumbed down for you. It's comical to watch a person like you with a pointed head, to be making fun of someone with pointed ears. Now go back to pulling the wings off flies, or drinking the cleaning fluids under the sink, and leave us adults alone to talk.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 17:24 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <4gn4cbtegf1uvkf1lf4686bfkb0m9hf7kk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #553312 |
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 04:56:08 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 19:50:50 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
>> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>>
>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>
>>>> I find his hypocrisy the most entertaining. As you've already
>>>> pointed out, he complains about cross-posting while cross-posting.
>>>
>>> To spell it out for the intellectually challenged:
>>
>> You're not THAT bad off.
>
>
>
>What, you talkin' bout Willis ?
Who?
>He may not be that bad off, but you sure need it dumbed down for you.
Yet I understood his hypocrisy without any effort. Odd that.
>It's comical to watch a person like you with a pointed head, to be making
>fun of someone with pointed ears.
I do not have pointed ears.
Is there anything, anything at all, about which you will not lie?
This is a serious question.
>
>Now go back to pulling the wings off flies, or drinking the cleaning fluids
>under the sink, and leave us adults alone to talk.
If only your mind was that of an adult's. Sadly, you're so
screwed up, you operate at the level of the average 10-year-old.
That's not intended as an insult, though it may appear to be. It
is meant as an accurate description of you as you present yourself.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web