Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #606448 > unrolled thread

Zero-dimensional objects

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Zero-dimensional objects john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-25 12:15 -0800
    Re: Zero-dimensional objects Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-25 12:23 -0800
      Re: Zero-dimensional objects Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-25 21:40 +0100
        know no newtonion zero-d objectives noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-25 15:30 -0800
          Re: know no newtonion zero-d objectives Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 08:28 +0100
          Re: know no newtonion zero-d objectives poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-25 23:36 -0800
            sTfU, you typing clown noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 20:34 -0800
              Re: sTfU, you typing clown poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-27 10:08 -0800
      Re: Zero-dimensional objects "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-25 13:19 -0800
        Re: Zero-dimensional objects "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-25 16:48 -0800
          Re: Zero-dimensional objects "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-11-27 11:18 -0800
            Re: Zero-dimensional objects "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-27 14:44 -0800
              Re: Zero-dimensional objects "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-11-28 16:34 -0800
                Re: Zero-dimensional objects "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-28 17:24 -0800
                Re: Zero-dimensional objects benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 20:44 -0500
                  Re: Zero-dimensional objects "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-29 10:08 -0800
    Re: Zero-dimensional objects moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-26 00:31 +0000
      Re: Zero-dimensional objects poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-25 23:38 -0800
        Re: Zero-dimensional objects moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-26 12:13 +0000
          Re: Zero-dimensional objects poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-27 10:16 -0800
      Re: Zero-dimensional objects HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 07:50 -0800
        Re: Zero-dimensional objects "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-11-27 11:20 -0800
        Re: Zero-dimensional objects benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:36 -0500
      Re: Zero-dimensional objects "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-11-27 11:17 -0800
        Re: Zero-dimensional objects poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-28 00:17 -0800
    Re: Zero-dimensional objects poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-25 23:33 -0800
    Re: Zero-dimensional objects Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:52 -0600
      Re: Zero-dimensional objects Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-27 20:52 +0100
        Re: Zero-dimensional objects Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 12:27 -0800
    Re: Zero-dimensional objects "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 10:32 -0800
      Re: Zero-dimensional objects "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-11-27 11:35 -0800
        Re: Zero-dimensional objects benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:50 -0500
          Re: Zero-dimensional objects poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-28 23:47 -0800
      Re: Zero-dimensional objects "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-27 14:52 -0800
      Re: Zero-dimensional objects HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 15:45 -0800
        Re: Zero-dimensional objects benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 17:09 -0500

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#606684

Michael Moroney
- hide quoted text -
john <johnse...@gmail.com> writes: 

>Physics was killed by zero dimensions. 
>Using zero dimensions for some of its parts 
>and then thinking they can upgrade later 
>is terminally stupid. 
>But hey, what do I know? 

So despite us asking repeatedly, why won't you answer our question, what 
problem do you have with point objects?  Can you give us any reason why 
point objects cannot exist?  Just one? 

It's you who is terminally stupid. 
------------

And john should know that point objects can range in mass from an electron to a super massive black hole.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#606720

On Sunday, November 27, 2016 at 7:50:05 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote:
> Michael Moroney
> - hide quoted text -
> john <johnse...@gmail.com> writes: 
> 
> >Physics was killed by zero dimensions. 
> >Using zero dimensions for some of its parts 
> >and then thinking they can upgrade later 
> >is terminally stupid. 
> >But hey, what do I know? 
> 
> So despite us asking repeatedly, why won't you answer our question, what 
> problem do you have with point objects?  Can you give us any reason why 
> point objects cannot exist?  Just one? 
> 
> It's you who is terminally stupid. 
> ------------
> 
> And john should know that point objects can range in mass from an electron to a super massive black hole.

Only one of those three things exist.

-Aut

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#606900

On 11/27/2016 10:50 AM, HVAC wrote:
> Michael Moroney
> - hide quoted text -
> john <johnse...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Physics was killed by zero dimensions.
>> Using zero dimensions for some of its parts
>> and then thinking they can upgrade later
>> is terminally stupid.
>> But hey, what do I know?
>
> So despite us asking repeatedly, why won't you answer our question, what
> problem do you have with point objects?  Can you give us any reason why
> point objects cannot exist?  Just one?
>
> It's you who is terminally stupid.
> ------------
>
> And john should know that point objects can range in mass from an electron to a super massive black hole.
>
And the way you know they have zero dimensions is?   ...Oh yeah, those 
super powers again.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#606718

On Friday, November 25, 2016 at 4:31:56 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:
> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >Physics was killed by zero dimensions.
> >Using zero dimensions for some of its parts
> >and then thinking they can upgrade later
> >is terminally stupid.
> >But hey, what do I know?
> 
> So despite us asking repeatedly, why won't you answer our question, what
> problem do you have with point objects?  Can you give us any reason why
> point objects cannot exist?  Just one?
> 
> It's you who is terminally stupid.

Easily:

range-potential relations
span-wave relations
lattice-bond relations
probability-scattering relations
parameter-uncertainty relations
scale-invariance relations

The professionals claim point objects exist in the same breath they imply the objects aren't composite, but those aren't the same thing.  Under the same flawed premise any measurement could only find point objects or objects that are compounds of point objects.  But the tool is not a point object; a test charge is, when another target charge is present, in the shape of a rounded bar or frustum; when the target charges are uniformly beset and approach infinite the test charge approaches a hollow ball, a boll: http://google.com/search?q=boll+cotton+OR+flax.

-Aut

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#606801

On Sunday, November 27, 2016 at 9:17:24 PM UTC+2, Autymn D. C. wrote:
> On Friday, November 25, 2016 at 4:31:56 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:
> > 
> > >Physics was killed by zero dimensions.
> > >Using zero dimensions for some of its parts
> > >and then thinking they can upgrade later
> > >is terminally stupid.
> > >But hey, what do I know?
> > 
> > So despite us asking repeatedly, why won't you answer our question, what
> > problem do you have with point objects?  Can you give us any reason why
> > point objects cannot exist?  Just one?
> > 
> > It's you who is terminally stupid.
> 
> Easily:
> 
> range-potential relations
> span-wave relations
> lattice-bond relations
> probability-scattering relations
> parameter-uncertainty relations
> scale-invariance relations
> 
> The professionals claim point objects exist in the same breath they imply the objects aren't composite, but those aren't the same thing.  Under the same flawed premise any measurement could only find point objects or objects that are compounds of point objects.  But the tool is not a point object; a test charge is, when another target charge is present, in the shape of a rounded bar or frustum; when the target charges are uniformly beset and approach infinite the test charge approaches a hollow ball, a boll: http://google.com/search?q=boll+cotton+OR+flax.
> 
> -Aut

======================
see
the eel model of the electron ''
and the ''chain of orbitals''
 system 
ATB
Y.Porat
==================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#606513

On Friday, November 25, 2016 at 10:15:59 PM UTC+2, john wrote:
> Physics was killed by zero dimensions.
> Using zero dimensions for some of its parts
> and then thinking they can upgrade later
> is terminally stupid.
> But hey, what do I know?

==========================
Joan    
YOU ARE ABSOLUTLY RIGHT !

'''NO MASS'' - ONLY IN LA LA LAND !!!!!
full  stop !!
OLD FINDING  
-------
BY
ENG
YEHIEL  PORAT
=================
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#606532

On 11/25/2016 2:15 PM, john wrote:
> Physics was killed by zero dimensions.
> Using zero dimensions for some of its parts
> and then thinking they can upgrade later
> is terminally stupid.

??? What are you on about?

> But hey, what do I know?

Not much, but that's because you use YouTube as your library.


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#606723

Odd Bodkin wrote:

> On 11/25/2016 2:15 PM, john wrote:
>> Physics was killed by zero dimensions.
>> Using zero dimensions for some of its parts
>> and then thinking they can upgrade later
>> is terminally stupid.
> 
> ??? What are you on about?

The proper question to ask “john” at this point is “What are you on?”.

Some kind of drug has to be involved to explain their distorted perception.
 
-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
<https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#606728

On Sunday, November 27, 2016 at 2:52:15 PM UTC-5, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Odd Bodkin wrote:
> 
> > On 11/25/2016 2:15 PM, john wrote:
> >> Physics was killed by zero dimensions.
> >> Using zero dimensions for some of its parts
> >> and then thinking they can upgrade later
> >> is terminally stupid.
> > 
> > ??? What are you on about?
> 
> The proper question to ask “john” at this point is “What are you on?”.
> 
> Some kind of drug has to be involved to explain their distorted perception.

Does it really befit your persona to make such unsupportable in-factual statements?

> -- 
> PointedEars
> FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
> <https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#606710

On Friday, November 25, 2016 at 12:15:59 PM UTC-8, john wrote:
> Physics was killed by zero dimensions.
> Using zero dimensions for some of its parts
> and then thinking they can upgrade later
> is terminally stupid.
> But hey, what do I know?

When so very tiny,and we can see no structure.When going very fast and we see no structure our brain tells us ?????  Sad but reality  TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#606722

On Sunday, November 27, 2016 at 10:32:22 AM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Friday, November 25, 2016 at 12:15:59 PM UTC-8, john wrote:
> > Physics was killed by zero dimensions.
> > Using zero dimensions for some of its parts
> > and then thinking they can upgrade later
> > is terminally stupid.
> > But hey, what do I know?
> 
> When so very tiny,and we can see no structure.When going very fast and we see no structure our brain tells us ?????  Sad but reality  TreBert

Nothing goes fast[:free::swift:slow::quick:qualm::hasty:laggy::speedy:idle::fleet:laden].  Something with no size [or length] can't be seen or felt; in other words it doesn't exist.

-Aut

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#606914

On 11/27/2016 2:35 PM, Autymn D. C. wrote:
> On Sunday, November 27, 2016 at 10:32:22 AM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>> On Friday, November 25, 2016 at 12:15:59 PM UTC-8, john wrote:
>>> Physics was killed by zero dimensions.
>>> Using zero dimensions for some of its parts
>>> and then thinking they can upgrade later
>>> is terminally stupid.
>>> But hey, what do I know?
>>
>> When so very tiny,and we can see no structure.When going very fast and we see no structure our brain tells us ?????  Sad but reality  TreBert
>
> Nothing goes fast[:free::swift:slow::quick:qualm::hasty:laggy::speedy:idle::fleet:laden].  Something with no size [or length] can't be seen or felt; in other words it doesn't exist.
>
> -Aut
>
Go tell it to HVAC. He says if he imagines something exists, then it 
exists even if it has no dimensions. He's quite the imperial thinker.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607016

On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 11:51:03 PM UTC+2, benj wrote:
> On 11/27/2016 2:35 PM, Autymn D. C. wrote:
> > On Sunday, November 27, 2016 at 10:32:22 AM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> >> On Friday, November 25, 2016 at 12:15:59 PM UTC-8, john wrote:
> >>> Physics was killed by zero dimensions.
> >>> Using zero dimensions for some of its parts
> >>> and then thinking they can upgrade later
> >>> is terminally stupid.
> >>> But hey, what do I know?
> >>
> >> When so very tiny,and we can see no structure.When going very fast and we see no structure our brain tells us ?????  Sad but reality  TreBert
> >
> > Nothing goes fast[:free::swift:slow::quick:qualm::hasty:laggy::speedy:idle::fleet:laden].  Something with no size [or length] can't be seen or felt; in other words it doesn't exist.
> >
> > -Aut
> >
> Go tell it to HVAC. He says if he imagines something exists, then it 
> exists even if it has no dimensions. He's quite the imperial thinker.
=======================
his brain is dimension less !!
Y.Porat
========================================
NO MASS -THEONLY MASS - NO REA; PHYSICS 
=========================================
now mass demands dimensions !!!

the brain in his empty skull
does not need any   dimensions 
yet
his  dishonesty  
occupies a lot of dimensions !!!
and he is not the only  one here about it

BTW
where has Warmly disappeared suddenly 
after tons of parroting here  !
some gang theft  business ???
=====================
Y.Porat
=======================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#606742

"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
When going very fast and Bert sees no structure in his brain 
tells us is Sad but reality" cuz Bert did NOT do what/when
 Cohen meant: " "Bert, you Swine, 'You must repent' "
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkRqQQWu_mA>
... and so the 
<http://tinyurl.com/Recalcitrant-Swine-Glazier> [1] still does
this < http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
to "Anon Y Mouse" &  8 other Glazier-shit-eaters
shown in [1] when the Full Swine and Criminal Graveyard
Vandal <http://tinyurl.com/Glazier-the-Lying-Swine>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#606755

When so very tiny,and we can see no structure.When going very fast and we see no structure our brain tells us ?????  Sad but reality  TreBert 
----------

Just complete and utter hogwash

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#606921

On 11/27/2016 6:45 PM, HVAC wrote:
> When so very tiny,and we can see no structure.When going very fast and we see no structure our brain tells us ?????  Sad but reality  TreBert
> ----------
>
> Just complete and utter hogwash
>
You are a low wit in comparison to a Nobel level imperial thinker like 
Bert. That is a given.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web