Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #555514 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-22 10:55 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-02-22 15:33 -0600 |
| Articles | 6 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Method Developed To Predict Local Climate Change Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 10:55 -0600
Re: Method Developed To Predict Local Climate Change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-22 19:28 +0000
Re: Method Developed To Predict Local Climate Change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-22 15:01 -0600
Re: Method Developed To Predict Local Climate Change James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 13:08 -0800
Re: Method Developed To Predict Local Climate Change Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-02-22 13:21 -0800
Re: Method Developed To Predict Local Climate Change Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 15:33 -0600
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 10:55 -0600 |
| Subject | Method Developed To Predict Local Climate Change |
| Message-ID | <h8ednUwJjPrloFbLnZ2dnUU7-V-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Method Developed To Predict Local Climate Change > http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/method-developed-to-predict-local-climate-change.html > Abstract > > The mountain regions of the Northeastern US are a critical > socioeconomic resource for Vermont, New York State, New Hampshire, > Maine, and Southern Quebec. While global climate models (GCMs) are > important tools for climate change risk assessment at regional > scales, even the increased spatial resolution of statistically > downscaled GCMs (commonly ~1/8°) is not sufficient for hydrologic, > ecologic, and land-use modeling of small watersheds within the > mountainous Northeast. To address this limitation, we develop an > ensemble of topographically downscaled, high-resolution (30”), daily > 2-m maximum air temperature, 2-m minimum air temperature, and > precipitation simulations for the mountainous Northeast by applying > an additional level of downscaling to intermediately downscaled > (1/8°) data using high-resolution topography and station > observations. We first derive observed relationships between 2-m air > temperature and elevation, and precipitation and elevation. Then, > these relationships are combined with spatial interpolation to > enhance the resolution of intermediately downscaled GCM simulations. > The resulting topographically downscaled dataset is analyzed for its > ability to reproduce station observations. We find that topographic > downscaling adds value to intermediately downscaled maximum and > minimum 2-m air temperature at high elevation stations, as well as > moderately improves domain-averaged maximum and minimum 2-m air > temperature. Topographic downscaling improves mean precipitation but > not daily probability distributions of precipitation. Overall, we > show that the utility of topographic downscaling is dependent on the > initial bias of the intermediately downscaled product and the > magnitude of the elevation adjustment. As the initial bias or > elevation adjustment increase, more value is added to the > topographically downscaled product. > > Citation > > Development and Evaluation of High-Resolution Climate Simulations > over the Mountainous Northeastern United States by Jonathan M. > Winter, Brian Beckage, Gabriela Bucini, Radley M. Horton and Patrick > J. Clemins published in Journal of Hydrometeorology, doi: > 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0052.1 -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 19:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <234spc-5c3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #555514 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > Method Developed To Predict Local Climate Change And it will be just as inaccurate as all the other models. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 15:01 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <naft0d$65k$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #555514 |
On 2/22/2016 10:55 AM, Sam Wormley wrote: > Method Developed To Predict Local Climate Change >> > > too many inside buzzz words, consolidated into poopette; ThemountainregionsoftheNortheasternUSareacriticalsocioeconomic esourceforVermontNewYorkStateNewHampshireMaineandSouthernQuebe Whileglobalclimatemodels(GCMs)areimportanttoolsforclimatechang riskassessmentatregionalscaleseventheincreasedspatialresolutio ofstatisticallydownscaledGCMs(commonly~1/8°)isnotsufficientfor ydrologicecologicandlandusemodelingofsmallwatershedswithinthem untainousNortheastToaddressthislimitationwedevelopanensembleof opographicallydownscaledhighresolution(30”)daily2mmaximumairte mperature2mminimumairtemperatureandprecipitationsimulationsfor hemountainousNortheastbyapplyinganadditionallevelofdownscaling tointermediatelydownscaled(1/8°)datausinghighresolutiontopogra hyandstationobservationsWefirstderiveobservedrelationshipsbetw een2mairtemperatureandelevationandprecipitationandelevationThe theserelationshipsarecombinedwithspatialinterpolationtoenhance theresolutionofintermediatelydownscaledGCMsimulationsTheresult ingtopographicallydownscaleddatasetisanalyzedforitsabilitytore producestationobservationsWefindthattopographicdownscalingadds valuetointermediatelydownscaledmaximumandminimum2mairtemperatu reathighelevationstationsaswellasmoderatelyimprovesdomainavera gedmaximumandminimum2mairtemperatureTopographicdownscalingimpr ovesmeanprecipitationbutnotdailyprobabilitydistributionsofprec ipitationOverallweshowthattheutilityoftopographicdownscalingis dependentontheinitialbiasoftheintermediatelydownscaledproducta ndthemagnitudeoftheelevationadjustmentAstheinitialbiasorelevat ionadjustmentincreasemorevalueisaddedtothetopographicallydowns
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 13:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <eb07f610-b821-4eaf-a7b1-a938013ae07a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #555514 |
Another layer of phoney complexity to confuse the public into thinking climatology is doing something useful.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 13:21 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7e22aa0c-cc02-434b-acd6-6fcd3e4a5635@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #555514 |
On Monday, February 22, 2016 at 8:55:24 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > Method Developed To Predict Local Climate Change > > http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/method-developed-to-predict-local-climate-change.html > > > > Abstract > > > > The mountain regions of the Northeastern US are a critical > > socioeconomic resource for Vermont, New York State, New Hampshire, > > Maine, and Southern Quebec. While global climate models (GCMs) are > > important tools for climate change risk assessment at regional > > scales, even the increased spatial resolution of statistically > > downscaled GCMs (commonly ~1/8°) is not sufficient for hydrologic, > > ecologic, and land-use modeling of small watersheds within the > > mountainous Northeast. To address this limitation, we develop an > > ensemble of topographically downscaled, high-resolution (30"), daily > > 2-m maximum air temperature, 2-m minimum air temperature, and > > precipitation simulations for the mountainous Northeast by applying > > an additional level of downscaling to intermediately downscaled > > (1/8°) data using high-resolution topography and station > > observations. We first derive observed relationships between 2-m air > > temperature and elevation, and precipitation and elevation. Then, > > these relationships are combined with spatial interpolation to > > enhance the resolution of intermediately downscaled GCM simulations. > > The resulting topographically downscaled dataset is analyzed for its > > ability to reproduce station observations. We find that topographic > > downscaling adds value to intermediately downscaled maximum and > > minimum 2-m air temperature at high elevation stations, as well as > > moderately improves domain-averaged maximum and minimum 2-m air > > temperature. Topographic downscaling improves mean precipitation but > > not daily probability distributions of precipitation. Overall, we > > show that the utility of topographic downscaling is dependent on the > > initial bias of the intermediately downscaled product and the > > magnitude of the elevation adjustment. As the initial bias or > > elevation adjustment increase, more value is added to the > > topographically downscaled product. > > > > Citation > > > > Development and Evaluation of High-Resolution Climate Simulations > > over the Mountainous Northeastern United States by Jonathan M. > > Winter, Brian Beckage, Gabriela Bucini, Radley M. Horton and Patrick > > J. Clemins published in Journal of Hydrometeorology, doi: > > 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0052.1 None of the Republican candidates running for President believe in climate change! Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 15:33 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <Mcydnfhit_YJ41bLnZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #555626 |
On 2/22/16 3:21 PM, Double-A wrote: > On Monday, February 22, 2016 at 8:55:24 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: >> Method Developed To Predict Local Climate Change >>> http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/method-developed-to-predict-local-climate-change.html >> >> >>> Abstract >>> >>> The mountain regions of the Northeastern US are a critical >>> socioeconomic resource for Vermont, New York State, New Hampshire, >>> Maine, and Southern Quebec. While global climate models (GCMs) are >>> important tools for climate change risk assessment at regional >>> scales, even the increased spatial resolution of statistically >>> downscaled GCMs (commonly ~1/8°) is not sufficient for hydrologic, >>> ecologic, and land-use modeling of small watersheds within the >>> mountainous Northeast. To address this limitation, we develop an >>> ensemble of topographically downscaled, high-resolution (30"), daily >>> 2-m maximum air temperature, 2-m minimum air temperature, and >>> precipitation simulations for the mountainous Northeast by applying >>> an additional level of downscaling to intermediately downscaled >>> (1/8°) data using high-resolution topography and station >>> observations. We first derive observed relationships between 2-m air >>> temperature and elevation, and precipitation and elevation. Then, >>> these relationships are combined with spatial interpolation to >>> enhance the resolution of intermediately downscaled GCM simulations. >>> The resulting topographically downscaled dataset is analyzed for its >>> ability to reproduce station observations. We find that topographic >>> downscaling adds value to intermediately downscaled maximum and >>> minimum 2-m air temperature at high elevation stations, as well as >>> moderately improves domain-averaged maximum and minimum 2-m air >>> temperature. Topographic downscaling improves mean precipitation but >>> not daily probability distributions of precipitation. Overall, we >>> show that the utility of topographic downscaling is dependent on the >>> initial bias of the intermediately downscaled product and the >>> magnitude of the elevation adjustment. As the initial bias or >>> elevation adjustment increase, more value is added to the >>> topographically downscaled product. >>> >>> Citation >>> >>> Development and Evaluation of High-Resolution Climate Simulations >>> over the Mountainous Northeastern United States by Jonathan M. >>> Winter, Brian Beckage, Gabriela Bucini, Radley M. Horton and Patrick >>> J. Clemins published in Journal of Hydrometeorology, doi: >>> 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0052.1 > > > None of the Republican candidates running for President believe in climate change! > > Double-A > Politicians--too bad none have science backgrounds. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web