Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #561673 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-11 21:42 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-11 14:36 -0700 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-11 21:42 +0100
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). throbbingsausage@gmail.com - 2016-03-11 14:36 -0700
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-11 21:42 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <20851496.Uz2CdLcj16@PointedEars.de> |
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > On 03 Mar 2016, you wrote in rec.arts.sf.written: >> "Chrysi Cat" amok-crossposted to 5(!) newsgroups, across alt.ALL >> and the Big 8(!), without Followup-To: >>> Usenet is mainly consumed by people who still use ASCII-only >>> newsreaders (personally, my Thunderbird is *capable* of more, >>> but there are people in here on PINE!). >> >> Their problem. There are locales and fonts supporting UTF-8 and >> other non- ASCII encodings even on the text console. A >> newsreader that does not support MIME in the 21st century is ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> officially borked now. See below. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Why do you post to Usenet when you know that a lot of people find > your crap unreadable? The “lot of people” exist only in your vivid imagination. While very few users prefer to stay in the dark ages, the rest of us have moved on *decades ago*. RTFRFC, RTFM, STFW. > Seriously, what's the point? You're a litterbug, leaving your trash in > other people's way, for no reason other than it makes you feel important > to force other people to clean up after you. Utter nonsense, to be expected from a trolling pseudo-hole. > And now you're reduced to email replies only? What a chickenshit way > to try to get the last word. Childish. Not so. Different to you and those that did not ask for your unqualified, unkind support, I attempt to limit the off-topic content that I generate. *PLONK* F'up2 poster -- PointedEars
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | throbbingsausage@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-11 14:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA5C894A0EEC7taustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #561673 |
Still playing childish retard games with followups, I see. Is that
the only way you can get the last word?
On 11 Mar 2016, you wrote in rec.arts.sf.written:
> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>
>> On 03 Mar 2016, you wrote in rec.arts.sf.written:
>>> "Chrysi Cat" amok-crossposted to 5(!) newsgroups, across
>>> alt.ALL and the Big 8(!), without Followup-To:
>>>> Usenet is mainly consumed by people who still use ASCII-only
>>>> newsreaders (personally, my Thunderbird is *capable* of more,
>>>> but there are people in here on PINE!).
>>>
>>> Their problem. There are locales and fonts supporting UTF-8
>>> and other non- ASCII encodings even on the text console. A
>>> newsreader that does not support MIME in the 21st century is
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> officially borked now. See below.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Why do you post to Usenet when you know that a lot of people
>> find your crap unreadable?
>
> The “lot of people” exist only in your vivid imagination.
Prove it. I'm hardly the only one who has commented on this idiocy,
even in this thread.
> While very few users prefer to stay in the dark ages, the rest
> of us have moved on *decades ago*. RTFRFC, RTFM, STFW.
I repeat: Why do you post to Usenet when you know that a lot of
people find your cap unreadable?
>
>> Seriously, what's the point? You're a litterbug, leaving your
>> trash in other people's way, for no reason other than it makes
>> you feel important to force other people to clean up after you.
>
> Utter nonsense, to be expected from a trolling pseudo-hole.
Your posts are exactly that, yes. But you didn't answer my
question.
>
>> And now you're reduced to email replies only? What a
>> chickenshit way to try to get the last word. Childish.
>
> Not so.
Yes, so.
> Different to you and those that did not ask for your
> unqualified, unkind support, I attempt to limit the off-topic
> content that I generate.
No, that's not it. You have a desperate need to get the last word,
at least in yoru own imagination, and you're too childish to do it
any other way. It's childish, stupid, and makes you look
chickenshit. You know that, but you really can't help yourself.
>
> *PLONK*
Yeah, that's effective.
>
> F'up2 poster
>
Go ask mummy for a cookie, and have her wipe the snot form your
nose. It's time for beddie-bye, and a growing boy needs his sleep.
--
Terry Austin
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web