Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #592380 > unrolled thread

Re: We're fat, spoiled brats.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-08 17:22 -0400
    Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-09 06:51 -0500
      Re: Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-09 19:15 -0400
        Re: Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 19:17 -0400
        Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-10 01:17 +0200
          Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-08-09 20:10 -0400
            Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-09 22:39 -0400
          Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-10 07:38 -0500
            The ( SpinFree ) context. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-08-10 07:04 -0700
        Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-09 20:41 -0400
          Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 20:56 -0400
        Re: Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-11 21:12 +0200
    Re: Wives cost a _ton_ more; same for programmers. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-09 12:02 -0700

#592380 — Re: We're fat, spoiled brats.

On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 18:03:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:

>
>Hugh Huntzinger asked: 
>> [ How does ] the FOSS writer get any compensation  
>> ( and thus, to have bread on his table ) in the first place 
>> to create the FOSS for others to use ?   
...
Hugh:
What is FOSS?

Please define your acronyms before you use them. For example: Fucking
Obnoxious Software Shitheads (FOSS) are always selling shitware and
calling it software - lol.

Signed:
Hard Where (hardware) man.

Mike
---------------------------------------------------
Michael J. Strickland			Reston, VA
---------------------------------------------------

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#592474

Michael J. Strickland wrote:

>On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 18:03:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:

*plonk*

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592598

On Tue, 09 Aug 2016 06:51:14 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
wrote:

>Michael J. Strickland wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 18:03:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
>
>*plonk*

What does *plonk* mean?

Mike

---------------------------------------------------
Michael J. Strickland			Reston, VA
---------------------------------------------------

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592599

On Tue, 09 Aug 2016 19:15:32 -0400, Michael J. Strickland wrote:

> On Tue, 09 Aug 2016 06:51:14 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
>>Michael J. Strickland wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 18:03:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
>>
>>*plonk*
> 
> What does *plonk* mean?
> 
> Mike
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Michael J. Strickland			Reston, VA
> ---------------------------------------------------

It's the mating call of a Linux "advocate".

-- 
flatfish+++
Often imitated.
Never duplicated.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592600

On Tue, 09 Aug 2016 19:15:32 -0400
Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 09 Aug 2016 06:51:14 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
> >Michael J. Strickland wrote:
> >  
> >>On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 18:03:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>
> >>wrote:  
> >
> >*plonk*  
> 
> What does *plonk* mean?

It means you entered his filter. chrisv does this every time someone
replies to Jeff-Relf.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592607

Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Tue, 09 Aug 2016 19:15:32 -0400
> Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 09 Aug 2016 06:51:14 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> >Michael J. Strickland wrote:
>> >  
>> >>On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 18:03:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>
>> >>wrote:  
>> >
>> >*plonk*  
>> 
>> What does *plonk* mean?
>
> It means you entered his filter. chrisv does this every time someone
> replies to Jeff-Relf.

Relf was interesting for awhile, but he's basically off-the-rails now.

-- 
For years a secret shame destroyed my peace--
I'd not read Eliot, Auden or MacNiece.
But now I think a thought that brings me hope:
Neither had Chaucer, Shakespeare, Milton, Pope.
		-- Justin Richardson.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592617

On 8/9/2016 8:10 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On Tue, 09 Aug 2016 19:15:32 -0400
>> Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 09 Aug 2016 06:51:14 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Michael J. Strickland wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 18:03:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> *plonk*
>>>
>>> What does *plonk* mean?
>>
>> It means you entered his filter. chrisv does this every time someone
>> replies to Jeff-Relf.
>
> Relf was interesting for awhile, but he's basically off-the-rails now.
>
What you mean "now" white man?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592651

Melzzzzz wrote:

> Michael J. Strickland wrote:
>>
>> chrisv  wrote:
>>>
>>> *plonk*  
>> 
>> What does *plonk* mean?
>
>It means you entered his filter. chrisv does this every time someone
>replies to Jeff-Relf.

If it's someone that I don't know, anyways...

-- 
"Oh my God, it's the finest code you'll ever see."  -  Jeff Relf,
referring to his unreadable garbage.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592660 — The ( SpinFree ) context.

My publicist ( MrChrisV ) quoted me thusly: ＜＜

  Oh my God, it's the finest code you'll ever see. ＞＞

The ( SpinFree ) context: ＜＜

  This macro:

    int zz ;
    #define z  zz=zz;

  lets me put "z" on a line by itself and set a breakpoint.

  Say, for example, you want to break when i == 5; just type:

    if ( i == 5 )
      z  //  Set a break_point here.

  Do you have any idea how much time it saves me ? !
  Oh my God, it's the finest code you'll ever see. ＞＞

  -- Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.18{16.00.Seattle.2014} in http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Posts.TXT
     https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/Zyqzyntxo-k/WI_q_un-MeoJ

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592611

On 8/9/2016 7:15 PM, Michael J. Strickland wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2016 06:51:14 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> Michael J. Strickland wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 18:03:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
>>
>> *plonk*
>
> What does *plonk* mean?
>
> Mike
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Michael J. Strickland			Reston, VA
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
Wow! I'll bet you really know some serious science given your total 
nerdy lack of digital social communication!

"plonk" is a usenet social media jargon that means your name has been 
added to the persons "killfile" so that all your posts will no longer be 
visible to him/her. The term "plonk" implies the noise of hitting the 
return key to finalize the operation of adding your name to the file.

Cripes do I have to explain EVERYTHING to you bunch of burger-flippers?
You know, Mike, that Google is your friend and that thing in front of 
your silly face is computer and it can be used to look up the meaning of 
words like "plonk". Stop being a fat spoiled brat demanding everyone do 
things for you and do them yourself for a change. The world owes you 
nothing. (and owes Rolf even less!)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592612

On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 20:41:00 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 8/9/2016 7:15 PM, Michael J. Strickland wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Aug 2016 06:51:14 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Michael J. Strickland wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 18:03:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
>>>
>>> *plonk*
>>
>> What does *plonk* mean?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> Michael J. Strickland			Reston, VA
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>
> Wow! I'll bet you really know some serious science given your total 
> nerdy lack of digital social communication!
> 
> "plonk" is a usenet social media jargon that means your name has been 
> added to the persons "killfile" so that all your posts will no longer be 
> visible to him/her. The term "plonk" implies the noise of hitting the 
> return key to finalize the operation of adding your name to the file.
> 
> Cripes do I have to explain EVERYTHING to you bunch of burger-flippers?
> You know, Mike, that Google is your friend and that thing in front of 
> your silly face is computer and it can be used to look up the meaning of 
> words like "plonk". Stop being a fat spoiled brat demanding everyone do 
> things for you and do them yourself for a change. The world owes you 
> nothing. (and owes Rolf even less!)

One correction.
In comp.os.linux.advocacy, the group where chrisv hangs out, when you
are **plonked** the Linux zealots will continue to talk non-stop about
you as well as replying 3rd party to your posts.

It's kind of a unique behavior that these Linux losers have adopted.

-- 
flatfish+++
Often imitated.
Never duplicated.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592802

Michael J.  Strickland amok-crossposted to comp.os.linux.advocacy and 
sci.physics:

> […] chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> Michael J. Strickland wrote:
>>> On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 18:03:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
>>
>> *plonk*
> 
> What does *plonk* mean?

<http://catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#lesser>

And if you continue posting like that (such *mindless* crossposts included), 
you will see a “plonk” from me very soon, too.

F'up2 comp.os.linux.advocacy

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592534 — Re: Wives cost a _ton_ more; same for programmers.

Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> 
> You don't have to pay an Asian programmer $5/hour,
> plenty of Americans will do it for free.
> 
> Are you looking for a hooker or a wife ?
> Wives cost a _ton_ more; same for programmers.
>

Rape is free.

A hooker cost ten bucks more..


A wife cost dinner ($40.00) a house ($500,000,00.00) and a car a littel brat (how much cost the brat?).

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web