Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #559139 > unrolled thread

Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. --  Jim Pennino Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 20:30 -0800
    Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. --  Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 05:27 +0000
      Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. --  Jim Pennino Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 21:54 -0800
        Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 07:55 -0600
        Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. --  Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 07:06 +0000
          Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. --  Jim Pennino edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-03-04 14:13 -0800
            Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. --  Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 22:40 +0000
        Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 08:58 -0600
          Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-04 11:01 -0600
          Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 09:39 -0800
            Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 13:44 -0800
              Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-03-04 14:15 -0800
              Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 22:13 +0000
            --j.p noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 14:06 -0800
              Re: --j.p James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 14:12 -0800
                Re: --j.p Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 16:59 -0600
    Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. --  Jim Pennino HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 07:17 -0800
      Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-04 09:29 -0600
        Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-04 09:30 -0600

#559139 — Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino

Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable 
and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. 

Can somebody help Mr. Peninno.  He is sure he as seen thousands of instance that cofirmed the existence of gaseous H2O in the atmosphere.  Surely, somebody must have seen something.  Please help him before he blows a gasket.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#559152

Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
> Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable 
> and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. 
> 
> Can somebody help Mr. Peninno.  He is sure he as seen thousands of
> instance that cofirmed the existence of gaseous H2O in the atmosphere. 
> Surely, somebody must have seen something.  Please help him before he
> blows a gasket.

You are projecting your emotional turmoil over the challenges to your
delusions again.

Start here:

Fundamentals of Physics, Halliday and Resnick

Sorry, no basic text on aberrant psychology immediately at hand.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559154

On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 9:31:05 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

I've got sad news for you, Jimbo.  The evidence is never going to show up

not ever

     never

         ever 
    
             ever

And the reason is because it doesn't exist. 

It is physically impossible.

There is no gaseous H2O in earth's atmosphere

Moist air is heavier than dry air

Moisture droplets--usually too small to be visible--are suspended by electrostatic forces

Convection plays no role at all, and if it did clouds would drop out of the sky like bricks

Storms pull moisture up high in the atmosphere

Moisture is intrinsic to storms 

The principles involved have nothing to do with convection

Meteorologists have been lying to you--to all of us.

Now you know

I suggest you don't tell anybody.  They tend to get real upset.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559176 — Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino

   Here's what you need to learn, James:

   Evaporation from soil, oceans, plants and lakes results in a
   continuous supply of Water Vapor (gaseous H2O) in the earth's
   atmosphere.

   Water vapour (H2O) like Oxygen (O2) like Nitrogen (N2) is an invisible
   gas, so there is nothing to see.

 > Water vapour (H2O molecules)

 > Water vapor, water vapour or aqueous vapor, is the *gaseous phase* of
 > water. It is one state of water within the hydrosphere. Water vapor
 > can be produced from the *evaporation or boiling of liquid water* or
 > from the *sublimation of ice* . Unlike other forms of water, water
 > vapor is invisible. Under typical atmospheric conditions, water vapor
 > is continuously generated by evaporation and removed by condensation.
 > It is *lighter than air* and *triggers convection currents* that can
 > lead to clouds.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559180

Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 9:31:05 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
> I've got sad news for you, Jimbo.  The evidence is never going to show up

Unfortunately for your delusions, the evidence is hundreds of years
old.

Since your delusions prevent you from reading a physics book that would
prove your delusions false, I'll keep looking for a book on aberrant
psychology for you so perhaps you can understand why you can't read a
physics book.

<snip delusional nonsense>

> I suggest you don't tell anybody.  They tend to get real upset.

Nope, when presented with your delusions, they tend to laugh their asses
off.

BTW, you never did tell me if you have ever had a restraining order
taken out against you.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559359

On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 9:05:07 AM UTC-5, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
[]
> Since your delusions prevent you from reading a physics book that would
> prove your delusions false, I'll keep looking for a book on aberrant
> psychology for you so perhaps you can understand why you can't read a
> physics book.
> 
> <snip delusional nonsense>
> 
> > I suggest you don't tell anybody.  They tend to get real upset.
> 
> Nope, when presented with your delusions, they tend to laugh their asses
> off.
> 
> BTW, you never did tell me if you have ever had a restraining order
> taken out against you.
> 

And he won't admit that he either does not have a degree in Physics
or got the degree from an internet college (like the ones that confer
one day divinity degrees).

Ed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559394

edprochak@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 9:05:07 AM UTC-5, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
> []
>> Since your delusions prevent you from reading a physics book that would
>> prove your delusions false, I'll keep looking for a book on aberrant
>> psychology for you so perhaps you can understand why you can't read a
>> physics book.
>> 
>> <snip delusional nonsense>
>> 
>> > I suggest you don't tell anybody.  They tend to get real upset.
>> 
>> Nope, when presented with your delusions, they tend to laugh their asses
>> off.
>> 
>> BTW, you never did tell me if you have ever had a restraining order
>> taken out against you.
>> 
> 
> And he won't admit that he either does not have a degree in Physics
> or got the degree from an internet college (like the ones that confer
> one day divinity degrees).
> 
> Ed

Unless his mental problems manifested later in life, I can't see how
he could possibly have a degree in anything.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559185 — Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino

On 3/3/16 11:54 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> There is no gaseous H2O in earth's atmosphere


   James, I want you to listen carefully -- with no water vapour in the
   air, within a few days you would be dead and your death would not be
   a pleasant one.

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559225 — Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino

On 3/4/2016 8:58 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 3/3/16 11:54 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
>> There is no gaseous H2O in earth's atmosphere
>
>
>    James, I want you to listen carefully -- with no water vapour in the
>    air, within a few days you would be dead and your death would not be
>    a pleasant one.
>

he will be like a piece of beef jerky from a food dehydrator in a few 
days.



why would they make food dehydrators,
	if they could not get rid of the water into the air ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559231 — Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino

On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 6:58:17 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 3/3/16 11:54 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> > There is no gaseous H2O in earth's atmosphere
> 
> 
>    James, I want you to listen carefully -- with no water vapour in the
>    air, within a few days you would be dead and your death would not be
>    a pleasant one.

Due to the temperatures required, if our atmosphere actually contained 
gaseous H2O (steam) we'd all be dead already.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559338 — Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino

On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 9:39:48 AM UTC-8, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 6:58:17 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > On 3/3/16 11:54 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> > > There is no gaseous H2O in earth's atmosphere
> > 
> > 
> >    James, I want you to listen carefully -- with no water vapour in the
> >    air, within a few days you would be dead and your death would not be
> >    a pleasant one.
> 
> Due to the temperatures required, if our atmosphere actually contained 
> gaseous H2O (steam) we'd all be dead already.

Yep.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559362 — Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino

On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 4:44:33 PM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote:
[]
> 
> Yep.

I have always said, talking to yourself is fine.
When you start replying to yourself, you are in trouble.

Get some help JM!!!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559366 — Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 9:39:48 AM UTC-8, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
>> On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 6:58:17 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> > On 3/3/16 11:54 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
>> > > There is no gaseous H2O in earth's atmosphere
>> > 
>> > 
>> >    James, I want you to listen carefully -- with no water vapour in the
>> >    air, within a few days you would be dead and your death would not be
>> >    a pleasant one.
>> 
>> Due to the temperatures required, if our atmosphere actually contained 
>> gaseous H2O (steam) we'd all be dead already.
> 
> Yep.

Answering one's own posts is a sign of a kook.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559354 — --j.p

except that there would be a few tons less of scrolling

> >    a pleasant one.
> 
> Due to the temperatures required, if our atmosphere actually contained 
> gaseous H2O (steam) we'd all be dead already.

steam is just a composite of water vapor & drops of water
(little, tiny drops of HOH in their bondingforms

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559358 — Re: --j.p

On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 2:06:15 PM UTC-8, noTthaTguY wrote:
> except that there would be a few tons less of scrolling
> 
> > >    a pleasant one.
> > 
> > Due to the temperatures required, if our atmosphere actually contained 
> > gaseous H2O (steam) we'd all be dead already.
> 
> steam is just a composite of water vapor & drops of water

Consult steam tables.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559401 — Re: --j.p

   Are you homeless, James?



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559186

Tornado says
Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable 
and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. 
---------------

Mr Tornado, do you think that people such as Jim McFly should be put to death for the good of the species?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559192 — Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino

On 3/4/2016 9:17 AM, HVAC wrote:
> Tornado says
> Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable
> and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts.
> ---------------
>
> Mr Tornado, do you think that people such as Jim McFly should be put to death for the good of the species?
>

yea, kill off that flipping C. Dink dude too,

These Airy-Fairy types need to ascend asap, the earth resources they 
consume can be reassigned for better, more constructive use by the 
collective whole.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559194 — Re: Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino

On 3/4/2016 9:29 AM, Sergio wrote:
> On 3/4/2016 9:17 AM, HVAC wrote:
>> Tornado says
>> Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books,
>> repeatable
>> and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts.
>> ---------------
>>
>> Mr Tornado, do you think that people such as Jim McFly should be put
>> to death for the good of the species?
>>
>
> yea, kill off that flipping C. Dink dude too,
>
> These Airy-Fairy types need to ascend asap, the earth resources they
> consume can be reassigned for better, more constructive use by the
> collective whole.

ho not whole.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web