Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #687163 > unrolled thread

Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
Last post2018-06-08 15:09 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 251 — 24 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:30 -0400
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:59 +0000
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:56 -0400
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:24 +0000
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:26 -0500
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:35 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:46 -0500
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:57 -0500
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:35 +0200
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:05 -0500
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:29 -0700
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:26 -0500
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:33 -0700
                                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-05-27 12:08 +0100
                                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:41 -0700
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:15 +0000
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:38 +0000
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:48 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:28 -0500
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:38 -0700
            Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
              Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
                Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:54 -0700
                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-27 02:04 +0000
                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:36 +0200
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:07 -0500
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:11 -0400
                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:32 -0500
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:51 -0700
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:16 +0000
                        Nadegda must be proud. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-27 00:44 -0700
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:43 -0400
                            "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-27 02:49 -0700
                              Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:38 -0400
                              Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:29 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:16 -0700
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:08 +0000
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:08 -0400
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-29 21:36 -0400
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 19:43 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-31 19:13 -0400
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-07 07:00 -0500
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:06 +0000
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-10 09:36 -0400
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-10 13:07 -0400
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:41 +0000
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:43 -0700
                                        BlueEyed Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-10 12:06 -0700
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:41 +0000
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 06:03 +0000
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 16:47 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:51 +0000
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 22:26 -0500
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 04:28 +0000
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:59 -0400
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:13 -0400
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:31 -0400
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:02 -0400
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:36 -0400
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:15 +0000
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:17 +0200
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:13 -0400
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:11 -0400
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:25 -0400
                                                        Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 13:04 -0700
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:16 +0000
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:18 +0200
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:17 -0400
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:16 -0400
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:52 -0400
                                                " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 13:27 -0700
                                                  Re: " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0700
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:48 -0700
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:15 -0400
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:17 +0000
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:19 +0200
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:31 +0000
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:35 +0200
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:11 -0400
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0400
                                                    Why does this concern you, exactly ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 14:43 -0700
                                                      Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:41 -0400
                                                        Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-31 05:12 -0700
                                                          Re: Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:03 -0700
                                                        Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 20:14 +0000
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
                                                      "kensi" is not smarter than the market. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-31 05:47 -0700
                                                        Re: "kensi" is not smarter than the market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 05:25 -0400
                                                          "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 05:42 -0700
                                                            Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0400
                                                              You know fuck all, trust me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 07:01 -0700
                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 10:36 -0400
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0500
                                                                    India digs porn; China can't see most of the Internet. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 08:42 -0700
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-01 09:41 -0700
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:28 -0400
                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
                                                                  The job market. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 08:18 -0700
                                                                    Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:10 +0000
                                                                      Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0400
                                                                        Re: The job market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
                                                                          Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:28 -0400
                                                                            Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:00 +0000
                                                                              Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:03 -0700
                                                                              Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
                                                                              Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:55 -0400
                                                                                Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:05 +0000
                                                                                  Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:54 -0700
                                                                                    Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:31 +0000
                                                                                      Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 14:16 -0700
                                                                                        Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:04 +0100
                                                                                          Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:08 -0700
                                                                                            Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:11 +0100
                                                                                          Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:35 -0700
                                                                                        Re: The job market. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-04 09:01 -0400
                                                                          Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:34 -0400
                                                                      Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:07 -0400
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:27 -0400
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:21 -0400
                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:12 +0000
                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:41 -0400
                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:52 -0400
                                                                            Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:32 -0400
                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-03 15:23 -0400
                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:22 +0100
                                                                            Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:26 -0700
                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:32 +0100
                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-01 19:53 -0500
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:09 +0000
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:28 -0400
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:44 -0500
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:14 +0000
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:47 -0400
                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:02 +0000
                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:58 -0400
                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:07 +0000
                                                              Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:35 -0400
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:49 -0400
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:18 -0400
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:43 -0400
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:19 +0000
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:08 -0700
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:52 +0000
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-27 11:33 -0500
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:42 +0000
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:38 -0400
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:30 -0400
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:12 -0700
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 19:40 -0500
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:38 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:09 -0500
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:56 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 22:20 -0400
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:24 -0500
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:29 +0200
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 23:25 -0400
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:52 -0700
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-27 12:10 +0100
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:13 -0400
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 11:26 -0500
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:04 -0700
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:18 +0200
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:30 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:43 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:39 +0000
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:33 -0400
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 06:50 +0000
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 00:53 -0700
                                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-09 01:48 +0000
                                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 19:14 -0700
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 11:44 -0400
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 23:43 -0700
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 07:28 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 11:57 +0000
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:38 +0000
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:26 -0400
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:00 +0000
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:47 +0000
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:50 -0700
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:55 -0700
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:30 -0500
                    Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:18 +0000
                      Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:41 -0700
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:18 -0400
                    Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:32 -0400
                      Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:55 +0000
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:43 +0000
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:10 -0700
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:34 +0000
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:22 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:52 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:54 -0400
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:37 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:05 +0000
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:08 -0400
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 10:59 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-06 01:38 +0000
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-06 03:49 +0000
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-06 06:44 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-06 16:18 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 10:53 +0000
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-07 07:58 -0400
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:20 -0400
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:39 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 13:38 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 14:46 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 15:16 -0400
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:22 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:56 -0400
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:22 +0000
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:34 -0400
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:57 +0000
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:55 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:19 -0400
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:50 -0400
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:23 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 19:40 -0400
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-04 19:33 +1000
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:20 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 14:25 -0700
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-06-08 15:09 -0700

Page 1 of 13  [1] 2 3 … 13  Next page →


#687163 — Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
SubjectStudy claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice
Message-ID<peb7sg$1h7f$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Rice – the staple food of billions – will become less nutritious as 
carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests:

http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-having-a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#687176

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-26 11:30 -0400
Message-ID<H4fOC.13107$Kp4.5780@fx43.iad>
In reply to#687163
On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
> Rice – the staple food of billions – will become less nutritious as 
> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests:
> 
> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-having-a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice 
> 
> 
Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving!
Oh wait. That's not worse...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687213

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-26 19:59 +0000
Message-ID<peceb7$v0b$6@dont-email.me>
In reply to#687176
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>> Rice – the staple food of billions – will become less nutritious as
>> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests:
>> 
>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-having-
a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>
> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving!
> Oh wait. That's not worse...

Fuck off, racist scum.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687232

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-26 16:56 -0400
Message-ID<wSjOC.312688$PE5.173128@fx37.iad>
In reply to#687213
On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> Rice – the staple food of billions – will become less nutritious as
>>> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests:
>>>
>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-having-
> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>>
>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving!
>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
> 
> Fuck off, racist scum.
> 
Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of 
"feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by the 
billions of people overload on the planet?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687243

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-26 22:24 +0000
Message-ID<pecmq6$v0b$13@dont-email.me>
In reply to#687232
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
>> 
>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> Rice – the staple food of billions – will become less nutritious as
>>>> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests:
>>>>
>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-
having-
>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>>>
>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving!
>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
>> 
>> Fuck off, racist scum.
>
> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by the
> billions of people overload on the planet?

It's been well established that affording women full rights, including 
economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about 
unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready 
access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction in 
birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the needed 
population reductions without resort to such horrific means as mass murder.

But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able to 
treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going to 
hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested cities...

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687257

FromBricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
Date2018-05-26 18:26 -0500
Message-ID<h3rjgdpthnl8stkfoj3cdi39sl9npi9taa@4ax.com>
In reply to#687243
On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
>
>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> Rice – the staple food of billions – will become less nutritious as
>>>>> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-
>having-
>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>>>>
>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving!
>>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
>>> 
>>> Fuck off, racist scum.
>>
>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
>> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by the
>> billions of people overload on the planet?
>
>It's been well established that affording women full rights, including 
>economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about 
>unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready 
>access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction in 
>birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the needed 
>population reductions without resort to such horrific means as mass murder.
>
>But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able to 
>treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going to 
>hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested cities...

You're Uncle Steve's wife. (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle
Steve you can't answer a civil question but you
double-triple-quadruple down on your maniacal murmurings.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687261

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-26 23:35 +0000
Message-ID<pecr0s$v0b$18@dont-email.me>
In reply to#687257
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:26:26 -0500, Bricked wrote:

> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>> Rice – the staple food of billions – will become less nutritious as
>>>>>> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-
>>having-
>>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving!
>>>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
>>>> 
>>>> Fuck off, racist scum.
>>>
>>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
>>> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by the
>>> billions of people overload on the planet?
>>
>>It's been well established that affording women full rights, including
>>economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about
>>unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready
>>access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction in
>>birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the
>>needed population reductions without resort to such horrific means as
>>mass murder.
>>
>>But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able
>>to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going
>>to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested
>>cities...
> 
> You're Uncle Steve's wife.

Wrong.

> (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle Steve you can't answer a
> civil question but you double-triple-quadruple down on your maniacal
> murmurings.

Another misogynist heard from.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687262

FromBricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
Date2018-05-26 18:46 -0500
Message-ID<c9sjgd95dsknl5d6ro7lh4ncgs0p1suh8v@4ax.com>
In reply to#687261
On Sat, 26 May 2018 23:35:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:26:26 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less nutritious as
>>>>>>> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-
>>>having-
>>>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving!
>>>>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Fuck off, racist scum.
>>>>
>>>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
>>>> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by the
>>>> billions of people overload on the planet?
>>>
>>>It's been well established that affording women full rights, including
>>>economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about
>>>unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready
>>>access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction in
>>>birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the
>>>needed population reductions without resort to such horrific means as
>>>mass murder.
>>>
>>>But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able
>>>to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going
>>>to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested
>>>cities...
>> 
>> You're Uncle Steve's wife.
>
>Wrong.
>
>> (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle Steve you can't answer a
>> civil question but you double-triple-quadruple down on your maniacal
>> murmurings.
>
>Another misogynist heard from.

You're a self loathing white liberal whackadoodle that's for certain.
Or you just play one in alt.checkrape.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687274

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
Message-ID<ped249$v0b$20@dont-email.me>
In reply to#687262
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:20:04 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:

> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:46:04 -0500, Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
> wrote:
> 
>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 23:35:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>melt!
>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:26:26 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>melt!
>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less nutritious
>>>>>>>>> as carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-
>>>>>having-
>>>>>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians
>>>>>>>> starving!
>>>>>>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Fuck off, racist scum.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
>>>>>> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by
>>>>>> the billions of people overload on the planet?
>>>>>
>>>>>It's been well established that affording women full rights,
>>>>>including economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to
>>>>>move about unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive
>>>>>autonomy and ready access to contraception and health care; results
>>>>>in a great reduction in birth rates. So liberating the women of the
>>>>>world will achieve the needed population reductions without resort to
>>>>>such horrific means as mass murder.
>>>>>
>>>>>But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be
>>>>>able to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world
>>>>>is going to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded
>>>>>congested cities...
>>>> 
>>>> You're Uncle Steve's wife.
>>>
>>>Wrong.
>>>
>>>> (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle Steve you can't answer a
>>>> civil question but you double-triple-quadruple down on your maniacal
>>>> murmurings.
>>>
>>>Another misogynist heard from.
>>
>>You're a self loathing white liberal whackadoodle that's for certain.
>>Or you just play one in alt.checkrape.
> 
> I am still looking where you were misogynistic and shit. It's not there,
> Nads has been reduced to any old name calling.

Then you need to look a little harder. Did you see the bit where I said 
women should be granted reproductive autonomy worldwide, and the "Bricked" 
kook characterized that as "maniacal murmurings"? Anyone who considers 
such a basic, egalitarian notion as everyone having reproductive autonomy 
over their own bodies as "maniacal murmurings" is a misogynist who wants 
to control women.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687280

FromBricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
Date2018-05-26 20:57 -0500
Message-ID<034kgdp8h2ir6c93oagahf8iot3jtnsql4@4ax.com>
In reply to#687274
On Sun, 27 May 2018 01:37:13 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:20:04 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:46:04 -0500, Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 23:35:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>melt!
>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:26:26 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>melt!
>>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less nutritious
>>>>>>>>>> as carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-
>>>>>>having-
>>>>>>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians
>>>>>>>>> starving!
>>>>>>>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Fuck off, racist scum.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
>>>>>>> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by
>>>>>>> the billions of people overload on the planet?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It's been well established that affording women full rights,
>>>>>>including economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to
>>>>>>move about unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive
>>>>>>autonomy and ready access to contraception and health care; results
>>>>>>in a great reduction in birth rates. So liberating the women of the
>>>>>>world will achieve the needed population reductions without resort to
>>>>>>such horrific means as mass murder.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be
>>>>>>able to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world
>>>>>>is going to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded
>>>>>>congested cities...
>>>>> 
>>>>> You're Uncle Steve's wife.
>>>>
>>>>Wrong.
>>>>
>>>>> (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle Steve you can't answer a
>>>>> civil question but you double-triple-quadruple down on your maniacal
>>>>> murmurings.
>>>>
>>>>Another misogynist heard from.
>>>
>>>You're a self loathing white liberal whackadoodle that's for certain.
>>>Or you just play one in alt.checkrape.
>> 
>> I am still looking where you were misogynistic and shit. It's not there,
>> Nads has been reduced to any old name calling.
>
>Then you need to look a little harder. Did you see the bit where I said 
>women should be granted reproductive autonomy worldwide, and the "Bricked" 
>kook characterized that as "maniacal murmurings"? Anyone who considers 
>such a basic, egalitarian notion as everyone having reproductive autonomy 
>over their own bodies as "maniacal murmurings" is a misogynist who wants 
>to control women.

I don't want to control you just get outta my face bitch.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687282

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-27 04:35 +0200
Message-ID<ba9r2b.1gd.19.2@news.alt.net>
In reply to#687280
On 2018-05-27 3:57 AM, Bricked wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2018 01:37:13 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:20:04 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:46:04 -0500, Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 23:35:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:26:26 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less nutritious
>>>>>>>>>>> as carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-
>>>>>>> having-
>>>>>>>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians
>>>>>>>>>> starving!
>>>>>>>>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fuck off, racist scum.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
>>>>>>>> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by
>>>>>>>> the billions of people overload on the planet?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's been well established that affording women full rights,
>>>>>>> including economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to
>>>>>>> move about unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive
>>>>>>> autonomy and ready access to contraception and health care; results
>>>>>>> in a great reduction in birth rates. So liberating the women of the
>>>>>>> world will achieve the needed population reductions without resort to
>>>>>>> such horrific means as mass murder.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be
>>>>>>> able to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world
>>>>>>> is going to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded
>>>>>>> congested cities...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're Uncle Steve's wife.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>> (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle Steve you can't answer a
>>>>>> civil question but you double-triple-quadruple down on your maniacal
>>>>>> murmurings.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another misogynist heard from.
>>>>
>>>> You're a self loathing white liberal whackadoodle that's for certain.
>>>> Or you just play one in alt.checkrape.
>>>
>>> I am still looking where you were misogynistic and shit. It's not there,
>>> Nads has been reduced to any old name calling.
>>
>> Then you need to look a little harder. Did you see the bit where I said
>> women should be granted reproductive autonomy worldwide, and the "Bricked"
>> kook characterized that as "maniacal murmurings"? Anyone who considers
>> such a basic, egalitarian notion as everyone having reproductive autonomy
>> over their own bodies as "maniacal murmurings" is a misogynist who wants
>> to control women.
> 
> I don't want to control you just get outta my face bitch.
> 
i don't want to control women it just happens

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687285

FromBricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
Date2018-05-26 22:05 -0500
Message-ID<d18kgdldq4eb12cus29igmg7rad1spdud4@4ax.com>
In reply to#687282
On Sun, 27 May 2018 04:35:22 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 2018-05-27 3:57 AM, Bricked wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 May 2018 01:37:13 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:20:04 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:46:04 -0500, Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 23:35:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:26:26 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less nutritious
>>>>>>>>>>>> as carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-
>>>>>>>> having-
>>>>>>>>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians
>>>>>>>>>>> starving!
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fuck off, racist scum.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
>>>>>>>>> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by
>>>>>>>>> the billions of people overload on the planet?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's been well established that affording women full rights,
>>>>>>>> including economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to
>>>>>>>> move about unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive
>>>>>>>> autonomy and ready access to contraception and health care; results
>>>>>>>> in a great reduction in birth rates. So liberating the women of the
>>>>>>>> world will achieve the needed population reductions without resort to
>>>>>>>> such horrific means as mass murder.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be
>>>>>>>> able to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world
>>>>>>>> is going to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded
>>>>>>>> congested cities...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're Uncle Steve's wife.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle Steve you can't answer a
>>>>>>> civil question but you double-triple-quadruple down on your maniacal
>>>>>>> murmurings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another misogynist heard from.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're a self loathing white liberal whackadoodle that's for certain.
>>>>> Or you just play one in alt.checkrape.
>>>>
>>>> I am still looking where you were misogynistic and shit. It's not there,
>>>> Nads has been reduced to any old name calling.
>>>
>>> Then you need to look a little harder. Did you see the bit where I said
>>> women should be granted reproductive autonomy worldwide, and the "Bricked"
>>> kook characterized that as "maniacal murmurings"? Anyone who considers
>>> such a basic, egalitarian notion as everyone having reproductive autonomy
>>> over their own bodies as "maniacal murmurings" is a misogynist who wants
>>> to control women.
>> 
>> I don't want to control you just get outta my face bitch.
>> 
>i don't want to control women it just happens

'Tis the nature of the beast, eh?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687287

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
Message-ID<ped7s9$v0b$24@dont-email.me>
In reply to#687280
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:57:30 -0500, Bricked wrote:

> On Sun, 27 May 2018 01:37:13 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:20:04 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:46:04 -0500, Bricked
>>> <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 23:35:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>melt!
>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:26:26 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>>melt!
>>>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less
>>>>>>>>>>> nutritious as carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new
>>>>>>>>>>> study suggests:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-
is-
>>>>>>>having-
>>>>>>>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians
>>>>>>>>>> starving!
>>>>>>>>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Fuck off, racist scum.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
>>>>>>>> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled
>>>>>>>> by the billions of people overload on the planet?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It's been well established that affording women full rights,
>>>>>>>including economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to
>>>>>>>move about unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive
>>>>>>>autonomy and ready access to contraception and health care; results
>>>>>>>in a great reduction in birth rates. So liberating the women of the
>>>>>>>world will achieve the needed population reductions without resort
>>>>>>>to such horrific means as mass murder.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be
>>>>>>>able to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world
>>>>>>>is going to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded
>>>>>>>congested cities...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You're Uncle Steve's wife.
>>>>>
>>>>>Wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>> (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle Steve you can't answer
>>>>>> a civil question but you double-triple-quadruple down on your
>>>>>> maniacal murmurings.
>>>>>
>>>>>Another misogynist heard from.
>>>>
>>>>You're a self loathing white liberal whackadoodle that's for certain.
>>>>Or you just play one in alt.checkrape.
>>> 
>>> I am still looking where you were misogynistic and shit. It's not
>>> there,
>>> Nads has been reduced to any old name calling.
>>
>>Then you need to look a little harder. Did you see the bit where I said
>>women should be granted reproductive autonomy worldwide, and the
>>"Bricked"
>>kook characterized that as "maniacal murmurings"? Anyone who considers
>>such a basic, egalitarian notion as everyone having reproductive
>>autonomy over their own bodies as "maniacal murmurings" is a misogynist
>>who wants to control women.
> 
> I don't want to control you just get outta my face bitch.

*KAZZAAAAP!* *ffft*

Oh, hell, not *another* one. I'm down to my last spare irony meter now!

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687289

FromBricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
Date2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
Message-ID<or8kgd5j4sjddk4uuon7roevjcdfmnd29s@4ax.com>
In reply to#687287
On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:57:30 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 27 May 2018 01:37:13 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:20:04 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:46:04 -0500, Bricked
>>>> <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 23:35:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>>><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>melt!
>>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:26:26 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>>>melt!
>>>>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less
>>>>>>>>>>>> nutritious as carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new
>>>>>>>>>>>> study suggests:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-
>is-
>>>>>>>>having-
>>>>>>>>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians
>>>>>>>>>>> starving!
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Fuck off, racist scum.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
>>>>>>>>> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled
>>>>>>>>> by the billions of people overload on the planet?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>It's been well established that affording women full rights,
>>>>>>>>including economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to
>>>>>>>>move about unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive
>>>>>>>>autonomy and ready access to contraception and health care; results
>>>>>>>>in a great reduction in birth rates. So liberating the women of the
>>>>>>>>world will achieve the needed population reductions without resort
>>>>>>>>to such horrific means as mass murder.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be
>>>>>>>>able to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world
>>>>>>>>is going to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded
>>>>>>>>congested cities...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You're Uncle Steve's wife.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle Steve you can't answer
>>>>>>> a civil question but you double-triple-quadruple down on your
>>>>>>> maniacal murmurings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Another misogynist heard from.
>>>>>
>>>>>You're a self loathing white liberal whackadoodle that's for certain.
>>>>>Or you just play one in alt.checkrape.
>>>> 
>>>> I am still looking where you were misogynistic and shit. It's not
>>>> there,
>>>> Nads has been reduced to any old name calling.
>>>
>>>Then you need to look a little harder. Did you see the bit where I said
>>>women should be granted reproductive autonomy worldwide, and the
>>>"Bricked"
>>>kook characterized that as "maniacal murmurings"? Anyone who considers
>>>such a basic, egalitarian notion as everyone having reproductive
>>>autonomy over their own bodies as "maniacal murmurings" is a misogynist
>>>who wants to control women.
>> 
>> I don't want to control you just get outta my face bitch.
>
>*KAZZAAAAP!* *ffft*
>
>Oh, hell, not *another* one. I'm down to my last spare irony meter now!

Oh please, don't you ever shut up?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687291

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-26 20:29 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.3573c5ddb88debdb993b4d@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#687289
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <or8kgd5j4sjddk4uuon7roevjcdfmnd29s@4ax.com>, 
bricked@barkingspiders.com says...


> 
> On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:57:30 -0500, Bricked wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 27 May 2018 01:37:13 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >> 
> >>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:20:04 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:46:04 -0500, Bricked
> >>>> <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 23:35:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> >>>>><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >>>>>>melt!
> >>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:26:26 -0500, Bricked wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> >>>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >>>>>>>>melt!
> >>>>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> >>>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
> >>>>>>>>>> melt!
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less
> >>>>>>>>>>>> nutritious as carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new
> >>>>>>>>>>>> study suggests:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-
> >is-
> >>>>>>>>having-
> >>>>>>>>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians
> >>>>>>>>>>> starving!
> >>>>>>>>>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>> Fuck off, racist scum.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
> >>>>>>>>> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled
> >>>>>>>>> by the billions of people overload on the planet?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>It's been well established that affording women full rights,
> >>>>>>>>including economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to
> >>>>>>>>move about unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive
> >>>>>>>>autonomy and ready access to contraception and health care; results
> >>>>>>>>in a great reduction in birth rates. So liberating the women of the
> >>>>>>>>world will achieve the needed population reductions without resort
> >>>>>>>>to such horrific means as mass murder.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be
> >>>>>>>>able to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world
> >>>>>>>>is going to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded
> >>>>>>>>congested cities...
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> You're Uncle Steve's wife.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Wrong.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle Steve you can't answer
> >>>>>>> a civil question but you double-triple-quadruple down on your
> >>>>>>> maniacal murmurings.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Another misogynist heard from.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>You're a self loathing white liberal whackadoodle that's for certain.
> >>>>>Or you just play one in alt.checkrape.
> >>>> 
> >>>> I am still looking where you were misogynistic and shit. It's not
> >>>> there,
> >>>> Nads has been reduced to any old name calling.
> >>>
> >>>Then you need to look a little harder. Did you see the bit where I said
> >>>women should be granted reproductive autonomy worldwide, and the
> >>>"Bricked"
> >>>kook characterized that as "maniacal murmurings"? Anyone who considers
> >>>such a basic, egalitarian notion as everyone having reproductive
> >>>autonomy over their own bodies as "maniacal murmurings" is a misogynist
> >>>who wants to control women.
> >> 
> >> I don't want to control you just get outta my face bitch.
> >
> >*KAZZAAAAP!* *ffft*
> >
> >Oh, hell, not *another* one. I'm down to my last spare irony meter now!
> 
> Oh please, don't you ever shut up?

I was just thinking the same thing... only about you, Ko0kfart.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687292

FromJanithor <Janithor@comcast.net>
Date2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
Message-ID<ped8o9$v33$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#687291
x-no-archive: yes

On 5/26/2018 8:29 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <or8kgd5j4sjddk4uuon7roevjcdfmnd29s@4ax.com>,
> bricked@barkingspiders.com says...
> 
> 
>>
>> On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:57:30 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 27 May 2018 01:37:13 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:20:04 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:46:04 -0500, Bricked
>>>>>> <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 23:35:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:26:26 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>>>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nutritious as carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> study suggests:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-
>>> is-
>>>>>>>>>> having-
>>>>>>>>>>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians
>>>>>>>>>>>>> starving!
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fuck off, racist scum.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
>>>>>>>>>>> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled
>>>>>>>>>>> by the billions of people overload on the planet?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's been well established that affording women full rights,
>>>>>>>>>> including economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to
>>>>>>>>>> move about unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive
>>>>>>>>>> autonomy and ready access to contraception and health care; results
>>>>>>>>>> in a great reduction in birth rates. So liberating the women of the
>>>>>>>>>> world will achieve the needed population reductions without resort
>>>>>>>>>> to such horrific means as mass murder.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be
>>>>>>>>>> able to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world
>>>>>>>>>> is going to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded
>>>>>>>>>> congested cities...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You're Uncle Steve's wife.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle Steve you can't answer
>>>>>>>>> a civil question but you double-triple-quadruple down on your
>>>>>>>>> maniacal murmurings.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Another misogynist heard from.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're a self loathing white liberal whackadoodle that's for certain.
>>>>>>> Or you just play one in alt.checkrape.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am still looking where you were misogynistic and shit. It's not
>>>>>> there,
>>>>>> Nads has been reduced to any old name calling.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then you need to look a little harder. Did you see the bit where I said
>>>>> women should be granted reproductive autonomy worldwide, and the
>>>>> "Bricked"
>>>>> kook characterized that as "maniacal murmurings"? Anyone who considers
>>>>> such a basic, egalitarian notion as everyone having reproductive
>>>>> autonomy over their own bodies as "maniacal murmurings" is a misogynist
>>>>> who wants to control women.
>>>>
>>>> I don't want to control you just get outta my face bitch.
>>>
>>> *KAZZAAAAP!* *ffft*
>>>
>>> Oh, hell, not *another* one. I'm down to my last spare irony meter now!
>>
>> Oh please, don't you ever shut up?
> 
> I was just thinking the same thing... only about you, Ko0kfart.

You should see what they're saying about him in the Dork.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687298

FromBricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
Date2018-05-26 23:26 -0500
Message-ID<vockgd922ts065b8uu1i1orbqdgad49ui5@4ax.com>
In reply to#687291
On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:29:01 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>Checkmate!  In article <or8kgd5j4sjddk4uuon7roevjcdfmnd29s@4ax.com>, 
>bricked@barkingspiders.com says...
>
>
>> 
>> On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> >On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:57:30 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, 27 May 2018 01:37:13 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> >>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:20:04 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:46:04 -0500, Bricked
>> >>>> <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>> 
>> >>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 23:35:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> >>>>><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> >>>>>>melt!
>> >>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:26:26 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> >>>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> >>>>>>> 
>> >>>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> >>>>>>>>melt!
>> >>>>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> >>>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>> >>>>>>>>>> melt!
>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> 
>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> nutritious as carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> study suggests:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-
>> >is-
>> >>>>>>>>having-
>> >>>>>>>>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians
>> >>>>>>>>>>> starving!
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
>> >>>>>>>>>> 
>> >>>>>>>>>> Fuck off, racist scum.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
>> >>>>>>>>> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled
>> >>>>>>>>> by the billions of people overload on the planet?
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>It's been well established that affording women full rights,
>> >>>>>>>>including economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to
>> >>>>>>>>move about unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive
>> >>>>>>>>autonomy and ready access to contraception and health care; results
>> >>>>>>>>in a great reduction in birth rates. So liberating the women of the
>> >>>>>>>>world will achieve the needed population reductions without resort
>> >>>>>>>>to such horrific means as mass murder.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be
>> >>>>>>>>able to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world
>> >>>>>>>>is going to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded
>> >>>>>>>>congested cities...
>> >>>>>>> 
>> >>>>>>> You're Uncle Steve's wife.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>Wrong.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle Steve you can't answer
>> >>>>>>> a civil question but you double-triple-quadruple down on your
>> >>>>>>> maniacal murmurings.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>Another misogynist heard from.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>You're a self loathing white liberal whackadoodle that's for certain.
>> >>>>>Or you just play one in alt.checkrape.
>> >>>> 
>> >>>> I am still looking where you were misogynistic and shit. It's not
>> >>>> there,
>> >>>> Nads has been reduced to any old name calling.
>> >>>
>> >>>Then you need to look a little harder. Did you see the bit where I said
>> >>>women should be granted reproductive autonomy worldwide, and the
>> >>>"Bricked"
>> >>>kook characterized that as "maniacal murmurings"? Anyone who considers
>> >>>such a basic, egalitarian notion as everyone having reproductive
>> >>>autonomy over their own bodies as "maniacal murmurings" is a misogynist
>> >>>who wants to control women.
>> >> 
>> >> I don't want to control you just get outta my face bitch.
>> >
>> >*KAZZAAAAP!* *ffft*
>> >
>> >Oh, hell, not *another* one. I'm down to my last spare irony meter now!
>> 
>> Oh please, don't you ever shut up?
>
>I was just thinking the same thing... only about you, Ko0kfart.

Your ego is showing dog breath.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687314

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-27 03:33 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.3574295128277eb1993b54@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#687298
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <vockgd922ts065b8uu1i1orbqdgad49ui5@4ax.com>, 
bricked@barkingspiders.com says...


> 
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:29:01 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> >Checkmate!  In article <or8kgd5j4sjddk4uuon7roevjcdfmnd29s@4ax.com>, 
> >bricked@barkingspiders.com says...
> >
> >
> >> 
> >> On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >> >On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:57:30 -0500, Bricked wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Sun, 27 May 2018 01:37:13 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> >> >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >> >>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:20:04 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:46:04 -0500, Bricked
> >> >>>> <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>> 
> >> >>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 23:35:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> >> >>>>><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> >>>>>>melt!
> >> >>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:26:26 -0500, Bricked wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> >> >>>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>> 
> >> >>>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> >>>>>>>>melt!
> >> >>>>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> >> >>>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
> >> >>>>>>>>>> melt!
> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> nutritious as carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> study suggests:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-
> >> >is-
> >> >>>>>>>>having-
> >> >>>>>>>>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> starving!
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
> >> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Fuck off, racist scum.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
> >> >>>>>>>>> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled
> >> >>>>>>>>> by the billions of people overload on the planet?
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>It's been well established that affording women full rights,
> >> >>>>>>>>including economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to
> >> >>>>>>>>move about unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive
> >> >>>>>>>>autonomy and ready access to contraception and health care; results
> >> >>>>>>>>in a great reduction in birth rates. So liberating the women of the
> >> >>>>>>>>world will achieve the needed population reductions without resort
> >> >>>>>>>>to such horrific means as mass murder.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be
> >> >>>>>>>>able to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world
> >> >>>>>>>>is going to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded
> >> >>>>>>>>congested cities...
> >> >>>>>>> 
> >> >>>>>>> You're Uncle Steve's wife.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>Wrong.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle Steve you can't answer
> >> >>>>>>> a civil question but you double-triple-quadruple down on your
> >> >>>>>>> maniacal murmurings.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>Another misogynist heard from.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>You're a self loathing white liberal whackadoodle that's for certain.
> >> >>>>>Or you just play one in alt.checkrape.
> >> >>>> 
> >> >>>> I am still looking where you were misogynistic and shit. It's not
> >> >>>> there,
> >> >>>> Nads has been reduced to any old name calling.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Then you need to look a little harder. Did you see the bit where I said
> >> >>>women should be granted reproductive autonomy worldwide, and the
> >> >>>"Bricked"
> >> >>>kook characterized that as "maniacal murmurings"? Anyone who considers
> >> >>>such a basic, egalitarian notion as everyone having reproductive
> >> >>>autonomy over their own bodies as "maniacal murmurings" is a misogynist
> >> >>>who wants to control women.
> >> >> 
> >> >> I don't want to control you just get outta my face bitch.
> >> >
> >> >*KAZZAAAAP!* *ffft*
> >> >
> >> >Oh, hell, not *another* one. I'm down to my last spare irony meter now!
> >> 
> >> Oh please, don't you ever shut up?
> >
> >I was just thinking the same thing... only about you, Ko0kfart.
> 
> Your ego is showing dog breath.

Get used to it, Head-of-Fuck.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687323

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom)
Date2018-05-27 12:08 +0100
Message-ID<1npgkcd.2i06fx9xtckbN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#687314
Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

> > >> >> I don't want to control you just get outta my face bitch.
> > >> >
> > >> >*KAZZAAAAP!* *ffft*
> > >> >
> > >> >Oh, hell, not *another* one. I'm down to my last spare irony meter now!
> > >> 
> > >> Oh please, don't you ever shut up?
> > >
> > >I was just thinking the same thing... only about you, Ko0kfart.
> > 
> > Your ego is showing dog breath.
> 
> Get used to it, Head-of-Fuck.

A proper charmer, eh, wot?

-- 
Darth Wader, WoD #1             No Club 

I can't help it 'bout the shape I'm in,
I can't sing, I ain't pretty and my legs are thin.
Don't ask me what I think of you,
I might not give the answer that you want me to.
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687382

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-27 13:41 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.3574b7c72b77824f993b6c@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#687323
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <1npgkcd.2i06fx9xtckbN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, 
snipeco.2@gmail.com says...


> 
> Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > >> >> I don't want to control you just get outta my face bitch.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >*KAZZAAAAP!* *ffft*
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Oh, hell, not *another* one. I'm down to my last spare irony meter now!
> > > >> 
> > > >> Oh please, don't you ever shut up?
> > > >
> > > >I was just thinking the same thing... only about you, Ko0kfart.
> > > 
> > > Your ego is showing dog breath.
> > 
> > Get used to it, Head-of-Fuck.
> 
> A proper charmer, eh, wot?

My favorite kind.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 13  [1] 2 3 … 13  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web