Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #536152 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-28 15:15 -0600 |
| Last post | 2015-11-28 23:06 +0000 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Isolation of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue: Part I Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 15:15 -0600
Re: Isolation of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue: Part I jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-28 23:06 +0000
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-28 15:15 -0600 |
| Subject | Isolation of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue: Part I |
| Message-ID | <r8ydnUTa-ZDghMfLnZ2dnUU7-W8AAAAA@giganews.com> |
Isolation of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue: Part I > http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2015/20151127_Isolation.pdf > Earlier this year I received a message from a long-time reader of my > Communications1, who was persuaded of the urgency of the climate > problem. As a significant supporter of the Democratic Party, he had > the opportunity to meet President Obama, and he was preparing a > specific question: would the President be willing to “meet with Jim > Hansen”, who, the supporter asserted, understood the problem as well > as anyone and has “some viable ways to fix the problem”? > Obama’s response: he had already read my stuff (presumably meaning my > book2), but would be interested in talking if it were about policy > (presumably meaning that he was already convinced about the reality > of the science). My response to the supporter was that we should > check whether the offer was real after my long-overdue “Ice Melt” > paper was submitted for publication. > This summer, after submitting the paper, my supporter tried > valiantly, but dolefully reported that he could not get through, the > President was too well protected. Not so easily deterred, I reported > the matter to Obama’s Science Adviser, John Holdren, and sent him my > Ice Melt paper. Holdren responded that it was a valuable paper, but > he ignored my request to meet the President. > So who does the President listen to? -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-28 23:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1lopic-5al.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #536152 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > Isolation of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue: Part I >> http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2015/20151127_Isolation.pdf > > >> Earlier this year I received a message from a long-time reader of my >> Communications1, who was persuaded of the urgency of the climate >> problem. As a significant supporter of the Democratic Party, he had >> the opportunity to meet President Obama, and he was preparing a >> specific question: would the President be willing to ?meet with Jim >> Hansen?, who, the supporter asserted, understood the problem as well >> as anyone and has ?some viable ways to fix the problem?? > >> Obama?s response: he had already read my stuff (presumably meaning my >> book2), but would be interested in talking if it were about policy >> (presumably meaning that he was already convinced about the reality >> of the science). My response to the supporter was that we should >> check whether the offer was real after my long-overdue ?Ice Melt? >> paper was submitted for publication. > >> This summer, after submitting the paper, my supporter tried >> valiantly, but dolefully reported that he could not get through, the >> President was too well protected. Not so easily deterred, I reported >> the matter to Obama?s Science Adviser, John Holdren, and sent him my >> Ice Melt paper. Holdren responded that it was a valuable paper, but >> he ignored my request to meet the President. > >> So who does the President listen to? Try spamming the President and see how that works for you. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web