Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #516491 > unrolled thread

Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED

Started by"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
First post2015-08-24 11:20 -0500
Last post2015-08-24 20:28 -0500
Articles 11 on this page of 71 — 9 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 11:20 -0500
    Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:48 +0000
      Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:27 -0500
        Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 17:55 +0000
        Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 12:34 -0500
    Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:12 +0100
      Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 09:17 -0400
        Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 15:30 +0100
          Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 10:53 -0400
            Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 10:15 -0500
              Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 11:35 -0400
                Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 11:02 -0500
                  Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 11:09 -0500
                    Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:03 -0400
                      Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 19:52 -0500
                      Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:18 -0500
                        Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-26 16:25 -0400
                          Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:23 -0500
                            Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-27 09:45 -0400
                    Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:18 -0500
              Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 10:36 -0500
              & & & noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 10:20 -0700
              Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 20:50 +0100
            Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:57 +0000
              Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:06 -0400
              Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 05:43 -0400
                Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:40 +0000
                  Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED 9/11 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:19 -0400
                    Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED 9/11 jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:00 +0000
                  Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED and so does Jim "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 17:06 -0500
                    Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED and so does Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 23:01 +0000
                    Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED and so does Jim "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:23 -0500
                    Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED and so does Jim gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 12:51 -0500
                  Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 07:25 +0200
              Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED  Jim is a LIAR "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 09:21 -0500
                Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED  Jim is a LIAR jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:41 +0000
                Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Jim is a LIAR gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:37 -0500
                Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED  Jim is a LIAR "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:21 -0500
            Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:01 -0400
              Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:02 -0400
                Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-26 16:36 -0400
                Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:21 -0500
                  Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 18:54 +0200
                    Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:01 -0500
                      Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 05:53 +0200
              Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED  BKD is BAD "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 09:47 -0500
                Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED  BKD is BAD jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:43 +0000
                Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED BKD is BAD gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 12:57 -0500
            Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:18 -0500
              Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:05 -0400
                Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:21 -0500
                  Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent lies too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:38 -0500
                    Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent lies too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:27 +0000
                      Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent lies too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:50 -0500
                        Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent lies too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 17:40 +0000
                          Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent lies too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 12:57 -0500
                            Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent lies too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 18:11 +0000
                        Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent lies too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 19:31 +0100
                    Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent lies too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:56 -0500
                      Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent can not provide one iota of evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 18:50 -0500
                        Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent can not provide one iota of evidence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:28 +0000
                        Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent can not provide one iota of evidence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:27 -0500
                        Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent can not provide one iota of evidence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:41 -0500
              Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 09:17 -0500
                Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:48 +0000
                  Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED (I did not see a plane go in) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 15:07 -0500
                    Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED (I did not see a plane go in) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 20:36 +0000
                    Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED (I did not see a plane go in) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 12:53 -0500
                Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:22 -0500
                Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 12:56 -0500
    Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:28 -0500

Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]

#517759 — Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent can not provide one iota of evidence

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-08-30 01:28 +0000
SubjectRe: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent can not provide one iota of evidence
Message-ID<kr2abc-bei.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#517743
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> I will say this though.  The exact location of the pools of molten metal is 
> very important because if they were under WTC3 and WTC4 then it helps prove 
> they were from the deep underground nukes that finished off the Twin Towers, 
> WTC3, WTC7 and Fiterman Hall..

Babbling about molten metal is irrelevant kook babble.

There were no nukes, you blithering idiot.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic
signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any
seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers
as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected
by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the
Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events.

A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a
fact that is widely known and trivial to verify.

Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it
has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data.

Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available
on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources.

Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any
governmental agency.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/how-to-find-a-nuclear-explosion-in-north-korea
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html

Be sure to follow all the links in the above links.

<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517777 — Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent can not provide one iota of evidence

Fromgilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2015-08-29 22:27 -0500
SubjectRe: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent can not provide one iota of evidence
Message-ID<mrtt7b$fku$2@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#517743
On 8/29/2015 6:50 PM, Rocky wrote:










           <snip crap>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517821 — Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent can not provide one iota of evidence

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-30 04:41 -0500
SubjectRe: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED Kent can not provide one iota of evidence
Message-ID<3tj5uapeeie1qmrlnit8vpf2f7b9gf8m99@4ax.com>
In reply to#517743
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 18:50:40 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:p274ua1f05a61ff4fu1578e8j0ooqro84a@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 10:38:08 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:alltta59osi326lhvl0vvqr710r5ch1u4g@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 06:05:41 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>>>> And yet that day 3 buildings all suffered the same fate. And all were
>>>>>>> owned by the same person.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Yep. And 100% of the available evidence shows no foul play of any
>>>>>> sort was involved.
>>>>>>     You are, of course, still free to provide any and all valid,
>>>>>> verifiable evidence you have that any part of what actually happened
>>>>>> did not happen.
>>>>>
>>>>>All the evidence is out there for you and anyone reading this, to look 
>>>>>at.
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.ae911truth.org
>>>>
>>>>     I requested valid evidence.
>>>>     Will you offer any, or continue to prove you lack the ability to
>>>> see bunk when it's handed to you?
>>>
>>>As I recall you ran from the following videos the last time and you will
>>>probably run again too.  <G>
>>
>>     Seek help for your constant lying.
>>
>>>The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is:
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
>>
>>     It's still bunk. And for the same reason I cited last time.
>>     Are you going to run away from them some more?
>
>And as usual for the Television Set Huggers you can't provide one iota of 
>evidence to support your bullshit.  <G>
>

     So you are going to run away. Since you did that last time, I
expected you would again.
     Now play another avoidance game. You know you can't stop
yourself. Your very well documented mental illness will not allow you
to address the truth.

>I will say this though.  The exact location of the pools of molten metal is 

     There was no molten metal. There was a lot of metal that was red
hot. But to the mentally sound, red hot is not molten.
     YM will V, of course.

>very important because if they were under WTC3 and WTC4 then it helps prove 
>they were from the deep underground nukes that finished off the Twin Towers, 
>WTC3, WTC7 and Fiterman Hall..
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>

     You keep linking to a picture that PROVES your claims wrong. What
is the motivation for this?
     How is that whole ignoring my posts thing working out for you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516998

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-08-26 09:17 -0500
Message-ID<frmdnfiTXKMNV0DInZ2dnUU7-YGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#516927
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:6e8qtadb2uffncorvquu7ajphsf4g11ukk@4ax.com...
>     Yep. And 100% of the available evidence shows no foul play of any
> sort was involved.

ROTFLMAO because despite all the excuses used by those that swear by the 
Television set like you the only way the disappearing wing of the alleged 
Flight 175 was ever recreated was with 3D software proving that it had to be 
a 3D CGI and not a real jet.  <G>

And there are a lot of videos of the alleged Flight 175 with the 
disappearing wing where nobody says anything about it.  It was like it was 
normal everyday occurrence especially after the crisis actors were used to 
make people think there were real jets in Nuke York City.

And now that we know NIST lied and lied and lied about why the Twin Towers 
came down they must have known a single jet could not bring them down and it 
had to be something else like a nuke or better yet a deep underground nuke. 
<G>

Rocky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517062

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-08-26 17:48 +0000
Message-ID<5oa1bc-4ni.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#516998
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> ROTFLMAO because despite all the excuses used by those that swear by the 
> Television set like you the only way the disappearing wing of the alleged 
> Flight 175 was ever recreated was with 3D software proving that it had to be 
> a 3D CGI and not a real jet.  <G>

Disappearing wings is just another delusion, kook.

The facts are some airliners were hijacked.

Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
almost 2 hours later.

One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.

Everything else is kook babble.

That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble.

That there is missing rubble is kook babble.

That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble.

That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble.

That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear
devices is kook babble.

That there was an EMP is kook babble.

That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not
seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble.

That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything
to do with what happened is kook babble.

That the scene was radioactive is kook babble.

That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima
or Nagasaki is kook babble.

That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear
is kook babble.

That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance 
and still be expected to work is kook babble.

That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear
bombs is kook babble.

That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the
airplanes hit the towers is kook babble.

That all the video was CGI is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the
windows is kook babble.

That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble.

That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion
is kook babble.

There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to
ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble.

Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble.

Rantings about specially treated dirt is kook babble.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon
and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is
kook babble.

Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble.


<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517083 — Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED (I did not see a plane go in)

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-08-26 15:07 -0500
SubjectRe: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED (I did not see a plane go in)
Message-ID<zLedna7Ij4Q9gUPInZ2dnUU7-Q2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#517062
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
news:5oa1bc-4ni.ln1@mail.specsol.com...

> Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers

And you can hear Don Dahler say for himself:  "I did not see a plane go in" 
and he was watching live and not on TV.

ABC News Live 9/11
 https://youtu.be/7KYE4zViAAg?t=11m37s

Plus at 11:45 in the above video you can hear the double beep that happens 
in some broadcast right before the CGIs are supposed to enter the staged 
event.

And pay special attention to the sound on the phone call because where is 
the sound of a jet in the phone call with Don Dahler?  <G>

Then check out the follow-up video with Don Dahler because they completely 
redo the part where he says  "I did not see a plane go in." so you don't 
hear him say "I did not see a plane go in."  And he didn't hear one either 
which is par for th course with CGIs.  <G>

9/11 - Anniversary CBS 2's Don Dahler Recounts Reporting For ABC On 
September 11th 2001
 https://youtu.be/bKtdC_Mxzvs?t=1m31s

Pretty funny that the first station I pull up can be used to prove ABC was 
using a CGI where the witness they were talking to could not see or hear the 
CGI in real life.

--------------------------------------

And then look at what NBC has.  NBC has the notorious "Ball" and not a jet 
at all:

(RARE) - 911 - The Entire NBC Footage 7 min. (The Ball)..never shown on TV 
!!
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wF74zTLjNg

Or watch it in this video cause it shows a ball too and not a jet.

Watch about 10 seconds of this video starting at 30:10 where it should start 
at it's own.

SEPTEMBER 11, 2001: AS IT HAPPENED (PART 1) (NBC)
 https://youtu.be/Nn9EVxueiyc?t=31m10s

So we have Don Dahler an eye witness with ABC that did not see or hear a 
plane and then we see "a Ball" fly into the Twin Towers.  I'd say just in a 
quick glance at some of the videos all you really saw in Nuke York City was 
two CGIs and Two deep underground nukes.  DUH

And the EMP recorded by WCBS.  It is clear it wasn't the camera that 
recorded the EMP but a directional antenna that must have been pointed right 
at the North Tower.

Nuclear destruction of the WTC
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y

Rocky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517105 — Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED (I did not see a plane go in)

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-08-26 20:36 +0000
SubjectRe: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED (I did not see a plane go in)
Message-ID<1kk1bc-7sj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#517083
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> And you can hear Don Dahler say for himself:  "I did not see a plane go in" 
> and he was watching live and not on TV.

Meanwhile in the real world, lots of people saw the airplane, kook.

<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517234 — Re: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED (I did not see a plane go in)

Fromgilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2015-08-27 12:53 -0500
SubjectRe: Ping gilber34: NIST LIED AND PEOPLE DIED (I did not see a plane go in)
Message-ID<mrniq7$eda$2@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#517083
>
> And the EMP recorded by WCBS.

no it wasn't. another lie.

>
> Nuclear destruction of the WTC
>


NO RADIATION, numb nuts, you like getting kicked in the balls when you lie ?

> Rocky
>
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517162

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-27 04:22 -0500
Message-ID<hlltta1p19fr45n8t03ju9dds5bsd06qp8@4ax.com>
In reply to#516998
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:17:17 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:


alt.astronomy removed.

     Speak to a mental health care professional about your OBSESSION
with an unrelated group, Rocky.


>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:6e8qtadb2uffncorvquu7ajphsf4g11ukk@4ax.com...
>>     Yep. And 100% of the available evidence shows no foul play of any
>> sort was involved.
>
>ROTFLMAO because despite all the excuses used by those that swear by the 
>Television set like you the only way the disappearing wing of the alleged 
>Flight 175 was ever recreated was with 3D software proving that it had to be 
>a 3D CGI and not a real jet.  <G>
>

     Once again, using the video you used to link to, I was able to
PROVE the wing did not disappear.
     How is that whole ignoring my posts thing working out for you,
Rocky? <G>

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517235

Fromgilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2015-08-27 12:56 -0500
Message-ID<mrnj07$eda$3@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#516998
On 8/26/2015 9:17 AM, Rocky wrote:



> it
> had to be something else like a nuke or better yet a deep underground nuke.
> <G>


no radiation, I kick you in the balls, KICK!!!
you be woman now,

>
> Rocky
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516687

Fromgilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2015-08-24 20:28 -0500
Message-ID<mrggbs$6lc$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#516491
On 8/24/2015 11:20 AM, Rocky wrote:
> gilber34 you are a complete idiot because it doesn't really matter if the
> Twin Towers were nuked or not because all that really matters is we were
> given complete and udder bullshit by NIST about what really brought the Twin
> Towers down.

it is easy to dump all your posts as no radiation was found at all.

also you sounding like that monkey boy from South Africa with his "new 
calculus" which is a total failure,

is that you John ?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web