Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #512510 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-10 15:54 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-13 19:04 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 108 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 15:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 16:12 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:34 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 21:59 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 17:24 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 22:41 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 09:09 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-11 14:07 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 15:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 20:36 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 16:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 22:28 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 17:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 23:29 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-12 05:27 -0400
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-12 16:58 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 15:49 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-12 21:09 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-12 19:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:03 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 16:44 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-12 18:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 04:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-12 17:00 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 04:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 16:29 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:40 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:30 -0500
Caught K the Kook in a farce (was: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:51 -0500
Re: Caught K the Kook in a farce (was: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:30 -0500
Re: Caught K the Kook in a farce (was: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 09:31 -0500
Re: Caught K the Kook in a farce (was: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 14:52 -0500
Re: Caught K the Kook in aBIG FARCE (was: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 15:46 -0500
Re: Caught K the Kook in aBIG FARCE (was: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 04:23 -0500
Re: Caught K the Kook in aBIG FARCE (was: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-12 16:39 +0000
Re: Caught K the Kook in aBIG FARCE (was: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:24 -0500
Re: Caught K the Kook in aBIG FARCE (was: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-13 04:06 +0000
Re: Caught K the Kook in aBIG FARCE (was: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 08:59 -0700
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 21:21 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:42 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 22:02 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 17:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 22:56 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 09:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 18:50 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 15:00 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 20:37 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 16:04 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 22:30 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 17:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 23:31 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 04:21 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-14 16:47 +0100
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 10:23 -0700
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:09 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:25 +0100
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 04:21 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 04:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-12 17:11 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-11 14:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:19 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-10 23:27 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 09:15 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 18:54 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake (#1 the planes were CGIs) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 15:25 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake (#1 the planes were CGIs) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 20:42 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake (#1 the planes were CGIs) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 16:15 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake (#1 the planes were CGIs) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 22:33 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 09:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-11 15:28 +0000
tOOtOOt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 12:26 -0700
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:06 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-12 18:30 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:13 -0500
fake argumentarium noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 16:50 -0700
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-13 03:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-18 06:45 +0200
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:18 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 14:10 -0700
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 16:53 -0700
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-13 14:27 -0700
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-13 22:56 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-15 05:39 +0200
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:50 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-16 06:58 +0200
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:25 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-17 05:09 +0200
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:49 -0700
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-20 01:58 +0200
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 03:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-22 05:45 +0200
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:59 -0500
2 Topaz stop right there (was: Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:17 -0500
Re: 2 Topaz stop right there (was: Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:23 -0500
Re: 2 Topaz stop right there (was: Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 10:06 -0500
Re: 2 Topaz stop right there (was: Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 10:26 -0500
Re: 2 Topaz stop right there jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:57 +0000
Re: 2 Topaz stop right there jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:56 +0000
Re: 2 Topaz stop right there Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake ( fake phone call too ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 09:33 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 16:24 -0700
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 19:04 -0700
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 15:54 -0500 |
| Subject | 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake |
| Message-ID | <qPWdneJLQInSklTInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEk81AL5qg0 And my top reason that the story of the alleged hijackers was bogus was the crash dynamics. All four jets were not consistent with real crashes because of missing debris as in the case of Flights 77 and 93 or the lack of a slow down on impact with Flights 11 or 175 which means Crisis Actors were needed to get you to believe that the CGIs that rammed into the Twin Towers were real. BTW if you look close at the crash dynamics of the jets going into the Twin Towers you will see a small flash on impact. That flash was only used to synchronize the real world with the bogus world so now you know the real reason for that flash. <G> FYI for those that do not know about nukes they have a "Vaporization Range" which on modern nukes is adjustable. So all the 9/11 perpetraitors had to do was make some adjustments to vaporize the Twin Towers right to the bogus impacts so they appeared to be crushed by the top part of the towers. But if the Twin Towers were crushed why did so much survive that was out of easy range for the deep underground nukes that were under WTC3 and WTC4? https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/tag/ground-zero/ And I've looked at the link above. While it contains a lot of good information it fails to address that the "Surviving Corners" of the Twin Towers can be used to figure out where the deep underground nukes were detonated. Rocky
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 16:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dfidnRhChoxKjlTInZ2dnUU7-Y0AAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512510 |
See: WTC Final Reports from NIST > http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/wtc_finalreports.cfm -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 16:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rbSdndCpMqUIhVTInZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512521 |
Re-inserted OP at the end of this post "Sam Wormley" <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote in message news:dfidnRhChoxKjlTInZ2dnUU7-Y0AAAAA@giganews.com... > See: WTC Final Reports from NIST > > http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/wtc_finalreports.cfm Wow, do they ever screw with you now because before you could download everything at once. BTW why don't you perform a quick search and see if their entire report is based on an untested hypothesis because it sure looks like that? Plus it is not what NIST said it is what they didn't say. NIST didn't say anything about why the Twin Towers ended up the way they did if they were supposed to have been crushed from above. <G> =============== OP ============== 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEk81AL5qg0 And my top reason that the story of the alleged hijackers was bogus was the crash dynamics. All four jets were not consistent with real crashes because of missing debris as in the case of Flights 77 and 93 or the lack of a slow down on impact with Flights 11 or 175 which means Crisis Actors were needed to get you to believe that the CGIs that rammed into the Twin Towers were real. BTW if you look close at the crash dynamics of the jets going into the Twin Towers you will see a small flash on impact. That flash was only used to synchronize the real world with the bogus world so now you know the real reason for that flash. <G> FYI for those that do not know about nukes they have a "Vaporization Range" which on modern nukes is adjustable. So all the 9/11 perpetraitors had to do was make some adjustments to vaporize the Twin Towers right to the bogus impacts so they appeared to be crushed by the top part of the towers. But if the Twin Towers were crushed why did so much survive that was out of easy range for the deep underground nukes that were under WTC3 and WTC4? https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/tag/ground-zero/ And I've looked at the link above. While it contains a lot of good information it fails to address that the "Surviving Corners" of the Twin Towers can be used to figure out where the deep underground nukes were detonated. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 21:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mfjn9c-arl.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #512532 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Re-inserted OP at the end of this post > > "Sam Wormley" <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:dfidnRhChoxKjlTInZ2dnUU7-Y0AAAAA@giganews.com... >> See: WTC Final Reports from NIST >> > http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/wtc_finalreports.cfm > > Wow, do they ever screw with you now because before you could download > everything at once. > > BTW why don't you perform a quick search and see if their entire report is > based on an untested hypothesis because it sure looks like that? > > Plus it is not what NIST said it is what they didn't say. NIST didn't say > anything about why the Twin Towers ended up the way they did if they were > supposed to have been crushed from above. <G> > > =============== OP ============== > > 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEk81AL5qg0 > > And my top reason that the story of the alleged hijackers was bogus was the > crash dynamics. > > All four jets were not consistent with real crashes because of missing > debris as in the case of Flights 77 and 93 or the lack of a slow down on > impact with Flights 11 or 175 which means Crisis Actors were needed to get > you to believe that the CGIs that rammed into the Twin Towers were real. > > BTW if you look close at the crash dynamics of the jets going into the Twin > Towers you will see a small flash on impact. That flash was only used to > synchronize the real world with the bogus world so now you know the real > reason for that flash. <G> > > FYI for those that do not know about nukes they have a "Vaporization Range" > which on modern nukes is adjustable. So all the 9/11 perpetraitors had to > do was make some adjustments to vaporize the Twin Towers right to the bogus > impacts so they appeared to be crushed by the top part of the towers. > > But if the Twin Towers were crushed why did so much survive that was out of > easy range for the deep underground nukes that were under WTC3 and WTC4? > > https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/tag/ground-zero/ > > And I've looked at the link above. While it contains a lot of good > information it fails to address that the "Surviving Corners" of the Twin > Towers can be used to figure out where the deep underground nukes were > detonated. > > Rocky Yet more ravings from the lunatic. Seek help from a mental health professional for your delusions and an English teacher for your bizarre word capitalizations. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 17:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <z7CdnUm4b9AguVTInZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512545 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:mfjn9c-arl.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> Re-inserted OP at the end of this post >> >> "Sam Wormley" <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:dfidnRhChoxKjlTInZ2dnUU7-Y0AAAAA@giganews.com... >>> See: WTC Final Reports from NIST >>> > http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/wtc_finalreports.cfm >> >> Wow, do they ever screw with you now because before you could download >> everything at once. >> >> BTW why don't you perform a quick search and see if their entire report >> is >> based on an untested hypothesis because it sure looks like that? >> >> Plus it is not what NIST said it is what they didn't say. NIST didn't >> say >> anything about why the Twin Towers ended up the way they did if they were >> supposed to have been crushed from above. <G> >> >> =============== OP ============== >> >> 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEk81AL5qg0 >> >> And my top reason that the story of the alleged hijackers was bogus was >> the >> crash dynamics. >> >> All four jets were not consistent with real crashes because of missing >> debris as in the case of Flights 77 and 93 or the lack of a slow down on >> impact with Flights 11 or 175 which means Crisis Actors were needed to >> get >> you to believe that the CGIs that rammed into the Twin Towers were real. >> >> BTW if you look close at the crash dynamics of the jets going into the >> Twin >> Towers you will see a small flash on impact. That flash was only used to >> synchronize the real world with the bogus world so now you know the real >> reason for that flash. <G> >> >> FYI for those that do not know about nukes they have a "Vaporization >> Range" >> which on modern nukes is adjustable. So all the 9/11 perpetraitors had >> to >> do was make some adjustments to vaporize the Twin Towers right to the >> bogus >> impacts so they appeared to be crushed by the top part of the towers. >> >> But if the Twin Towers were crushed why did so much survive that was out >> of >> easy range for the deep underground nukes that were under WTC3 and WTC4? >> >> https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/tag/ground-zero/ >> >> And I've looked at the link above. While it contains a lot of good >> information it fails to address that the "Surviving Corners" of the Twin >> Towers can be used to figure out where the deep underground nukes were >> detonated. >> >> Rocky > > Yet more ravings from the lunatic. > > Seek help from a mental health professional for your delusions and > an English teacher for your bizarre word capitalizations. You are like a mocking bird. You take what your mother says to you and repeat it to others. Pardon me if I forget to respond to anymore of your mother's words. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 22:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mtln9c-t4m.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #512559 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:mfjn9c-arl.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> Re-inserted OP at the end of this post >>> >>> "Sam Wormley" <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:dfidnRhChoxKjlTInZ2dnUU7-Y0AAAAA@giganews.com... >>>> See: WTC Final Reports from NIST >>>> > http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/wtc_finalreports.cfm >>> >>> Wow, do they ever screw with you now because before you could download >>> everything at once. >>> >>> BTW why don't you perform a quick search and see if their entire report >>> is >>> based on an untested hypothesis because it sure looks like that? >>> >>> Plus it is not what NIST said it is what they didn't say. NIST didn't >>> say >>> anything about why the Twin Towers ended up the way they did if they were >>> supposed to have been crushed from above. <G> >>> >>> =============== OP ============== >>> >>> 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEk81AL5qg0 >>> >>> And my top reason that the story of the alleged hijackers was bogus was >>> the >>> crash dynamics. >>> >>> All four jets were not consistent with real crashes because of missing >>> debris as in the case of Flights 77 and 93 or the lack of a slow down on >>> impact with Flights 11 or 175 which means Crisis Actors were needed to >>> get >>> you to believe that the CGIs that rammed into the Twin Towers were real. >>> >>> BTW if you look close at the crash dynamics of the jets going into the >>> Twin >>> Towers you will see a small flash on impact. That flash was only used to >>> synchronize the real world with the bogus world so now you know the real >>> reason for that flash. <G> >>> >>> FYI for those that do not know about nukes they have a "Vaporization >>> Range" >>> which on modern nukes is adjustable. So all the 9/11 perpetraitors had >>> to >>> do was make some adjustments to vaporize the Twin Towers right to the >>> bogus >>> impacts so they appeared to be crushed by the top part of the towers. >>> >>> But if the Twin Towers were crushed why did so much survive that was out >>> of >>> easy range for the deep underground nukes that were under WTC3 and WTC4? >>> >>> https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/tag/ground-zero/ >>> >>> And I've looked at the link above. While it contains a lot of good >>> information it fails to address that the "Surviving Corners" of the Twin >>> Towers can be used to figure out where the deep underground nukes were >>> detonated. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> Yet more ravings from the lunatic. >> >> Seek help from a mental health professional for your delusions and >> an English teacher for your bizarre word capitalizations. > > You are like a mocking bird. You take what your mother says to you and > repeat it to others. Pardon me if I forget to respond to anymore of your > mother's words. > > Rocky And the lunatic continues to rave on. Seek help from a mental health professional for your delusions. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 09:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rbmdnbIPr_JAnFfInZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512572 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:mtln9c-t4m.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:mfjn9c-arl.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> Re-inserted OP at the end of this post >>>> >>>> "Sam Wormley" <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:dfidnRhChoxKjlTInZ2dnUU7-Y0AAAAA@giganews.com... >>>>> See: WTC Final Reports from NIST >>>>> > http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/wtc_finalreports.cfm >>>> >>>> Wow, do they ever screw with you now because before you could download >>>> everything at once. >>>> >>>> BTW why don't you perform a quick search and see if their entire report >>>> is >>>> based on an untested hypothesis because it sure looks like that? >>>> >>>> Plus it is not what NIST said it is what they didn't say. NIST didn't >>>> say >>>> anything about why the Twin Towers ended up the way they did if they >>>> were >>>> supposed to have been crushed from above. <G> >>>> >>>> =============== OP ============== >>>> >>>> 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEk81AL5qg0 >>>> >>>> And my top reason that the story of the alleged hijackers was bogus was >>>> the >>>> crash dynamics. >>>> >>>> All four jets were not consistent with real crashes because of missing >>>> debris as in the case of Flights 77 and 93 or the lack of a slow down >>>> on >>>> impact with Flights 11 or 175 which means Crisis Actors were needed to >>>> get >>>> you to believe that the CGIs that rammed into the Twin Towers were >>>> real. >>>> >>>> BTW if you look close at the crash dynamics of the jets going into the >>>> Twin >>>> Towers you will see a small flash on impact. That flash was only used >>>> to >>>> synchronize the real world with the bogus world so now you know the >>>> real >>>> reason for that flash. <G> >>>> >>>> FYI for those that do not know about nukes they have a "Vaporization >>>> Range" >>>> which on modern nukes is adjustable. So all the 9/11 perpetraitors had >>>> to >>>> do was make some adjustments to vaporize the Twin Towers right to the >>>> bogus >>>> impacts so they appeared to be crushed by the top part of the towers. >>>> >>>> But if the Twin Towers were crushed why did so much survive that was >>>> out >>>> of >>>> easy range for the deep underground nukes that were under WTC3 and >>>> WTC4? >>>> >>>> https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/tag/ground-zero/ >>>> >>>> And I've looked at the link above. While it contains a lot of good >>>> information it fails to address that the "Surviving Corners" of the >>>> Twin >>>> Towers can be used to figure out where the deep underground nukes were >>>> detonated. >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> Yet more ravings from the lunatic. >>> >>> Seek help from a mental health professional for your delusions and >>> an English teacher for your bizarre word capitalizations. >> >> You are like a mocking bird. You take what your mother says to you and >> repeat it to others. Pardon me if I forget to respond to anymore of your >> mother's words. >> >> Rocky > > And the lunatic continues to rave on. > > Seek help from a mental health professional for your delusions. " Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 14:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mqdh5s$u4q$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #512559 |
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>
>> Yet more ravings from the lunatic.
>>
>> Seek help from a mental health professional for your delusions and
>> an English teacher for your bizarre word capitalizations.
>
> You are like a mocking bird. You take what your mother says to you and
> repeat it to others. Pardon me if I forget to respond to anymore of your
> mother's words.
>
> Rocky
>
>
Ten Reasons why Your Mother is Fake.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 15:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <y9idnfh7zfoZxlfInZ2dnUU7-SmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512788 |
"gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message news:mqdh5s$u4q$2@speranza.aioe.org... >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> Yet more ravings from the lunatic. >>> >>> Seek help from a mental health professional for your delusions and >>> an English teacher for your bizarre word capitalizations. >> >> You are like a mocking bird. You take what your mother says to you and >> repeat it to others. Pardon me if I forget to respond to anymore of your >> mother's words. >> >> Rocky >> >> > > > > > Ten Reasons why Your Mother is Fake. As usual, those that have never looked into the facts behind the Great 9/11 Hoax can not state any facts from 9/11/01. <G> It is as if you are completely ignorant of Actors or Crisis Actors in particular. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 20:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vv2q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #512829 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message > news:mqdh5s$u4q$2@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> Yet more ravings from the lunatic. >>>> >>>> Seek help from a mental health professional for your delusions and >>>> an English teacher for your bizarre word capitalizations. >>> >>> You are like a mocking bird. You take what your mother says to you and >>> repeat it to others. Pardon me if I forget to respond to anymore of your >>> mother's words. >>> >>> Rocky >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Ten Reasons why Your Mother is Fake. > > As usual, those that have never looked into the facts behind the Great 9/11 > Hoax can not state any facts from 9/11/01. <G> > > It is as if you are completely ignorant of Actors or Crisis Actors in > particular. <G> > > Rocky Why do you continue to capitalize words that should not be capitalized, lunatic, I mean other than your delusions? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 16:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <krGdnSOs-fd0_1fInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512836 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:vv2q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message >> news:mqdh5s$u4q$2@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> Yet more ravings from the lunatic. >>>>> >>>>> Seek help from a mental health professional for your delusions and >>>>> an English teacher for your bizarre word capitalizations. >>>> >>>> You are like a mocking bird. You take what your mother says to you and >>>> repeat it to others. Pardon me if I forget to respond to anymore of >>>> your >>>> mother's words. >>>> >>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Ten Reasons why Your Mother is Fake. >> >> As usual, those that have never looked into the facts behind the Great >> 9/11 >> Hoax can not state any facts from 9/11/01. <G> >> >> It is as if you are completely ignorant of Actors or Crisis Actors in >> particular. <G> >> >> Rocky > > Why do you continue to capitalize words that should not be capitalized, > lunatic, I mean other than your delusions? You would learn something if you didn't spend so much time nitpicking. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 22:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lg9q9c-hr2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #512844 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:vv2q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message >>> news:mqdh5s$u4q$2@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> Yet more ravings from the lunatic. >>>>>> >>>>>> Seek help from a mental health professional for your delusions and >>>>>> an English teacher for your bizarre word capitalizations. >>>>> >>>>> You are like a mocking bird. You take what your mother says to you and >>>>> repeat it to others. Pardon me if I forget to respond to anymore of >>>>> your >>>>> mother's words. >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Ten Reasons why Your Mother is Fake. >>> >>> As usual, those that have never looked into the facts behind the Great >>> 9/11 >>> Hoax can not state any facts from 9/11/01. <G> >>> >>> It is as if you are completely ignorant of Actors or Crisis Actors in >>> particular. <G> >>> >>> Rocky >> >> Why do you continue to capitalize words that should not be capitalized, >> lunatic, I mean other than your delusions? > > You would learn something if you didn't spend so much time nitpicking. > > Rocky While you on the other hand will never be able to learn anything. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 17:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bIOdnUl_E8l75VfInZ2dnUU7-TednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512864 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:lg9q9c-hr2.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:vv2q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message >>>> news:mqdh5s$u4q$2@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yet more ravings from the lunatic. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Seek help from a mental health professional for your delusions and >>>>>>> an English teacher for your bizarre word capitalizations. >>>>>> >>>>>> You are like a mocking bird. You take what your mother says to you >>>>>> and >>>>>> repeat it to others. Pardon me if I forget to respond to anymore of >>>>>> your >>>>>> mother's words. >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ten Reasons why Your Mother is Fake. >>>> >>>> As usual, those that have never looked into the facts behind the Great >>>> 9/11 >>>> Hoax can not state any facts from 9/11/01. <G> >>>> >>>> It is as if you are completely ignorant of Actors or Crisis Actors in >>>> particular. <G> >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> Why do you continue to capitalize words that should not be capitalized, >>> lunatic, I mean other than your delusions? >> >> You would learn something if you didn't spend so much time nitpicking. >> >> Rocky > > While you on the other hand will never be able to learn anything. ROTFLMAO when it is you who have never compared a Controlled Demolition to what remained of the Twin Towers. <G> The fact is the "Surviving Corners" towered way above any debris pile from the Twin Towers and that is only possible in Nuclear Controlled Demolitions. <G> And you can not count what looks like 6 floors of debris as a debris pile because the fact is that was Stairwell B where about a dozen people survived in the North Tower. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 23:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e4dq9c-da3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #512866 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:lg9q9c-hr2.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:vv2q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:mqdh5s$u4q$2@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yet more ravings from the lunatic. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Seek help from a mental health professional for your delusions and >>>>>>>> an English teacher for your bizarre word capitalizations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are like a mocking bird. You take what your mother says to you >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> repeat it to others. Pardon me if I forget to respond to anymore of >>>>>>> your >>>>>>> mother's words. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Ten Reasons why Your Mother is Fake. >>>>> >>>>> As usual, those that have never looked into the facts behind the Great >>>>> 9/11 >>>>> Hoax can not state any facts from 9/11/01. <G> >>>>> >>>>> It is as if you are completely ignorant of Actors or Crisis Actors in >>>>> particular. <G> >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> Why do you continue to capitalize words that should not be capitalized, >>>> lunatic, I mean other than your delusions? >>> >>> You would learn something if you didn't spend so much time nitpicking. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> While you on the other hand will never be able to learn anything. > > ROTFLMAO when it is you who have never compared a Controlled Demolition to > what remained of the Twin Towers. <G> Why is "Controlled Demolition" capitalized, kook? > The fact is the "Surviving Corners" towered way above any debris pile from > the Twin Towers and that is only possible in Nuclear Controlled Demolitions. > <G> Why are "Surviving Corners" and "Nuclear Controlled Demolitions" capitalized, kook? > And you can not count what looks like 6 floors of debris as a debris pile > because the fact is that was Stairwell B where about a dozen people survived > in the North Tower. <G> Why is "Stairwell" capitalized, kook? How long have you been delusional, kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 05:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mqf3ej$eu9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #512874 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:lg9q9c-hr2.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:vv2q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:mqdh5s$u4q$2@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yet more ravings from the lunatic. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Seek help from a mental health professional for your delusions >>>>>>>>> and an English teacher for your bizarre word capitalizations. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are like a mocking bird. You take what your mother says to >>>>>>>> you and >>>>>>>> repeat it to others. Pardon me if I forget to respond to >>>>>>>> anymore of your >>>>>>>> mother's words. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ten Reasons why Your Mother is Fake. >>>>>> >>>>>> As usual, those that have never looked into the facts behind the >>>>>> Great 9/11 >>>>>> Hoax can not state any facts from 9/11/01. <G> >>>>>> >>>>>> It is as if you are completely ignorant of Actors or Crisis Actors >>>>>> in particular. <G> >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize words that should not be >>>>> capitalized, lunatic, I mean other than your delusions? >>>> >>>> You would learn something if you didn't spend so much time >>>> nitpicking. >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> While you on the other hand will never be able to learn anything. >> >> ROTFLMAO when it is you who have never compared a Controlled >> Demolition to what remained of the Twin Towers. <G> > > Why is "Controlled Demolition" capitalized, kook? > >> The fact is the "Surviving Corners" towered way above any debris pile >> from the Twin Towers and that is only possible in Nuclear Controlled >> Demolitions. <G> > > Why are "Surviving Corners" and "Nuclear Controlled Demolitions" > capitalized, kook? > >> And you can not count what looks like 6 floors of debris as a debris >> pile because the fact is that was Stairwell B where about a dozen >> people survived in the North Tower. <G> > > Why is "Stairwell" capitalized, kook? > > How long have you been delusional, kook? I can't believe YOU, for beng so anal retentive about spelling or grammer. When 9/11 was CLEARLY an inside job, and those people who carried it out killing millions if you include the wars they justified over that one day..... you have nothing to queston ? And YES,....I'm giving you some more caps to get your panties in a knot over......YoU dUmBaSs
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 16:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1ias9c-76p.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #512951 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:lg9q9c-hr2.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:vv2q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:mqdh5s$u4q$2@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yet more ravings from the lunatic. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Seek help from a mental health professional for your delusions >>>>>>>>>> and an English teacher for your bizarre word capitalizations. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You are like a mocking bird. You take what your mother says to >>>>>>>>> you and >>>>>>>>> repeat it to others. Pardon me if I forget to respond to >>>>>>>>> anymore of your >>>>>>>>> mother's words. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ten Reasons why Your Mother is Fake. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As usual, those that have never looked into the facts behind the >>>>>>> Great 9/11 >>>>>>> Hoax can not state any facts from 9/11/01. <G> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is as if you are completely ignorant of Actors or Crisis Actors >>>>>>> in particular. <G> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize words that should not be >>>>>> capitalized, lunatic, I mean other than your delusions? >>>>> >>>>> You would learn something if you didn't spend so much time >>>>> nitpicking. >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> While you on the other hand will never be able to learn anything. >>> >>> ROTFLMAO when it is you who have never compared a Controlled >>> Demolition to what remained of the Twin Towers. <G> >> >> Why is "Controlled Demolition" capitalized, kook? >> >>> The fact is the "Surviving Corners" towered way above any debris pile >>> from the Twin Towers and that is only possible in Nuclear Controlled >>> Demolitions. <G> >> >> Why are "Surviving Corners" and "Nuclear Controlled Demolitions" >> capitalized, kook? >> >>> And you can not count what looks like 6 floors of debris as a debris >>> pile because the fact is that was Stairwell B where about a dozen >>> people survived in the North Tower. <G> >> >> Why is "Stairwell" capitalized, kook? >> >> How long have you been delusional, kook? > > > > > > > I can't believe YOU, for beng so anal retentive about spelling or grammer. Consistantly captitalizing common words that should not be capitalized is a sign of mental illness. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 15:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <b_qdnUgAJ5rlLFbInZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #513024 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:1ias9c-76p.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:lg9q9c-hr2.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:vv2q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:mqdh5s$u4q$2@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yet more ravings from the lunatic. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Seek help from a mental health professional for your delusions >>>>>>>>>>> and an English teacher for your bizarre word capitalizations. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You are like a mocking bird. You take what your mother says to >>>>>>>>>> you and >>>>>>>>>> repeat it to others. Pardon me if I forget to respond to >>>>>>>>>> anymore of your >>>>>>>>>> mother's words. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ten Reasons why Your Mother is Fake. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As usual, those that have never looked into the facts behind the >>>>>>>> Great 9/11 >>>>>>>> Hoax can not state any facts from 9/11/01. <G> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is as if you are completely ignorant of Actors or Crisis Actors >>>>>>>> in particular. <G> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize words that should not be >>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic, I mean other than your delusions? >>>>>> >>>>>> You would learn something if you didn't spend so much time >>>>>> nitpicking. >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> While you on the other hand will never be able to learn anything. >>>> >>>> ROTFLMAO when it is you who have never compared a Controlled >>>> Demolition to what remained of the Twin Towers. <G> >>> >>> Why is "Controlled Demolition" capitalized, kook? >>> >>>> The fact is the "Surviving Corners" towered way above any debris pile >>>> from the Twin Towers and that is only possible in Nuclear Controlled >>>> Demolitions. <G> >>> >>> Why are "Surviving Corners" and "Nuclear Controlled Demolitions" >>> capitalized, kook? >>> >>>> And you can not count what looks like 6 floors of debris as a debris >>>> pile because the fact is that was Stairwell B where about a dozen >>>> people survived in the North Tower. <G> >>> >>> Why is "Stairwell" capitalized, kook? >>> >>> How long have you been delusional, kook? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I can't believe YOU, for beng so anal retentive about spelling or >> grammer. > > Consistantly captitalizing common words that should not be capitalized > is a sign of mental illness. And so is nitpicking about them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 21:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <u8ps9c-40r.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #513065 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:1ias9c-76p.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:lg9q9c-hr2.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:vv2q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:mqdh5s$u4q$2@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yet more ravings from the lunatic. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Seek help from a mental health professional for your delusions >>>>>>>>>>>> and an English teacher for your bizarre word capitalizations. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You are like a mocking bird. You take what your mother says to >>>>>>>>>>> you and >>>>>>>>>>> repeat it to others. Pardon me if I forget to respond to >>>>>>>>>>> anymore of your >>>>>>>>>>> mother's words. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ten Reasons why Your Mother is Fake. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As usual, those that have never looked into the facts behind the >>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 >>>>>>>>> Hoax can not state any facts from 9/11/01. <G> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is as if you are completely ignorant of Actors or Crisis Actors >>>>>>>>> in particular. <G> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize words that should not be >>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic, I mean other than your delusions? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You would learn something if you didn't spend so much time >>>>>>> nitpicking. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> While you on the other hand will never be able to learn anything. >>>>> >>>>> ROTFLMAO when it is you who have never compared a Controlled >>>>> Demolition to what remained of the Twin Towers. <G> >>>> >>>> Why is "Controlled Demolition" capitalized, kook? >>>> >>>>> The fact is the "Surviving Corners" towered way above any debris pile >>>>> from the Twin Towers and that is only possible in Nuclear Controlled >>>>> Demolitions. <G> >>>> >>>> Why are "Surviving Corners" and "Nuclear Controlled Demolitions" >>>> capitalized, kook? >>>> >>>>> And you can not count what looks like 6 floors of debris as a debris >>>>> pile because the fact is that was Stairwell B where about a dozen >>>>> people survived in the North Tower. <G> >>>> >>>> Why is "Stairwell" capitalized, kook? >>>> >>>> How long have you been delusional, kook? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I can't believe YOU, for beng so anal retentive about spelling or >>> grammer. >> >> Consistantly captitalizing common words that should not be capitalized >> is a sign of mental illness. > > And so is nitpicking about them. Pointing out that you continue to do it to the same words over and over like some obsessed lunatic is hardly nitpicking. Nitpicking would be commenting on your atrocious grammar. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 19:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mqgj67$as8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #513072 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:1ias9c-76p.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:lg9q9c-hr2.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:vv2q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:mqdh5s$u4q$2@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet more ravings from the lunatic. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Seek help from a mental health professional for your >>>>>>>>>>>>> delusions and an English teacher for your bizarre word >>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalizations. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You are like a mocking bird. You take what your mother says >>>>>>>>>>>> to you and >>>>>>>>>>>> repeat it to others. Pardon me if I forget to respond to >>>>>>>>>>>> anymore of your >>>>>>>>>>>> mother's words. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ten Reasons why Your Mother is Fake. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As usual, those that have never looked into the facts behind >>>>>>>>>> the Great 9/11 >>>>>>>>>> Hoax can not state any facts from 9/11/01. <G> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is as if you are completely ignorant of Actors or Crisis >>>>>>>>>> Actors in particular. <G> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize words that should not be >>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic, I mean other than your delusions? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You would learn something if you didn't spend so much time >>>>>>>> nitpicking. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>> >>>>>>> While you on the other hand will never be able to learn anything. >>>>>> >>>>>> ROTFLMAO when it is you who have never compared a Controlled >>>>>> Demolition to what remained of the Twin Towers. <G> >>>>> >>>>> Why is "Controlled Demolition" capitalized, kook? >>>>> >>>>>> The fact is the "Surviving Corners" towered way above any debris >>>>>> pile from the Twin Towers and that is only possible in Nuclear >>>>>> Controlled Demolitions. <G> >>>>> >>>>> Why are "Surviving Corners" and "Nuclear Controlled Demolitions" >>>>> capitalized, kook? >>>>> >>>>>> And you can not count what looks like 6 floors of debris as a >>>>>> debris pile because the fact is that was Stairwell B where about a >>>>>> dozen people survived in the North Tower. <G> >>>>> >>>>> Why is "Stairwell" capitalized, kook? >>>>> >>>>> How long have you been delusional, kook? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I can't believe YOU, for beng so anal retentive about spelling or >>>> grammer. >>> >>> Consistantly captitalizing common words that should not be capitalized >>> is a sign of mental illness. >> >> And so is nitpicking about them. > > Pointing out that you continue to do it to the same words over and over > like some obsessed lunatic is hardly nitpicking. > > Nitpicking would be commenting on your atrocious grammar. Do your blood pressure a favour then, and get the heck off USENET. And NEVER go on twitter.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 11:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pqydnYfJUvrv_1LInZ2dnUU7-L2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #513116 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mqgj67$as8$1@dont-email.me... > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:1ias9c-76p.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:lg9q9c-hr2.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:vv2q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:mqdh5s$u4q$2@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet more ravings from the lunatic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seek help from a mental health professional for your >>>>>>>>>>>>>> delusions and an English teacher for your bizarre word >>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalizations. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You are like a mocking bird. You take what your mother says >>>>>>>>>>>>> to you and >>>>>>>>>>>>> repeat it to others. Pardon me if I forget to respond to >>>>>>>>>>>>> anymore of your >>>>>>>>>>>>> mother's words. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ten Reasons why Your Mother is Fake. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> As usual, those that have never looked into the facts behind >>>>>>>>>>> the Great 9/11 >>>>>>>>>>> Hoax can not state any facts from 9/11/01. <G> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It is as if you are completely ignorant of Actors or Crisis >>>>>>>>>>> Actors in particular. <G> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize words that should not be >>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic, I mean other than your delusions? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You would learn something if you didn't spend so much time >>>>>>>>> nitpicking. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> While you on the other hand will never be able to learn anything. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ROTFLMAO when it is you who have never compared a Controlled >>>>>>> Demolition to what remained of the Twin Towers. <G> >>>>>> >>>>>> Why is "Controlled Demolition" capitalized, kook? >>>>>> >>>>>>> The fact is the "Surviving Corners" towered way above any debris >>>>>>> pile from the Twin Towers and that is only possible in Nuclear >>>>>>> Controlled Demolitions. <G> >>>>>> >>>>>> Why are "Surviving Corners" and "Nuclear Controlled Demolitions" >>>>>> capitalized, kook? >>>>>> >>>>>>> And you can not count what looks like 6 floors of debris as a >>>>>>> debris pile because the fact is that was Stairwell B where about a >>>>>>> dozen people survived in the North Tower. <G> >>>>>> >>>>>> Why is "Stairwell" capitalized, kook? >>>>>> >>>>>> How long have you been delusional, kook? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I can't believe YOU, for beng so anal retentive about spelling or >>>>> grammer. >>>> >>>> Consistantly captitalizing common words that should not be capitalized >>>> is a sign of mental illness. >>> >>> And so is nitpicking about them. >> >> Pointing out that you continue to do it to the same words over and over >> like some obsessed lunatic is hardly nitpicking. >> >> Nitpicking would be commenting on your atrocious grammar. > > > > > Do your blood pressure a favour then, and get the heck off USENET. > And NEVER go on twitter. After you pointed out Jim has a problem above Jim didn't get off of USENET he just quit posting to alt.astronomy. Now if only you could do the same thing with Hägar Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web