Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #515667 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-21 17:22 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-25 09:50 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 87 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 17:22 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-08-21 18:54 -0400
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 22:56 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-21 18:59 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:44 +0200
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 11:48 -0400
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 18:47 +0200
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 15:08 -0400
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:46 +0200
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:06 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:54 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 04:07 +0200
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:21 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-23 03:59 -0400
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 17:43 +0200
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 12:04 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 17:23 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:44 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:23 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:43 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 14:36 -0400
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:54 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:54 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:53 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:01 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 21:02 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:49 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:26 +0000
? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 05:42 -0500
Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 04:07 -0700
2 je suis charly was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:52 -0500
Re: 2 je suis charly was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:28 -0700
Re: 2 je suis charly was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:20 +0000
Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 12:15 +0100
Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:23 -0500
seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:35 -0500
Re: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:42 -0500
Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:05 -0500
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
T-annoy the pain keeps keeps the bullshit going (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:53 -0500
Re: T-annoy the pain keeps keeps the bullshit going jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:19 +0000
Re: T-annoy the pain keeps keeps the bullshit going Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:13 +0000
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:04 -0500
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:18 -0500
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 19:50 +0000
Jim the bullshitter keeps bullshitting "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:28 -0500
Re: Jim the bullshitter keeps bullshitting jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:40 +0000
Re: Jim the bullshitter keeps bullshitting je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:20 -0700
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:08 -0500
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:03 -0500
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
Re: seismic evidence is inconsistent jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:11 +0000
Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:46 -0500
Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:08 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:45 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:24 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:44 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 05:09 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:40 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 09:36 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:07 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 13:03 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-24 11:59 -0400
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:57 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:35 +0200
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:41 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 17:55 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:13 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:55 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 03:44 +0200
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:50 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 05:18 +0200
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:29 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:45 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:28 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Ming Tiggle" <none@nomail.com> - 2015-08-21 21:52 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:12 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Ming Tiggle" <none@nomail.com> - 2015-08-21 21:53 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:55 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:54 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:11 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:21 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:30 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:44 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:50 -0700
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 08:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <g9jjtad91ileg5gef6dbsqrnel118vjkqg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516054 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 05:09:17 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>In article <ifcjta9pca3jrge9qr3gaapqt40375vfiq@4ax.com>,
> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >WTF??? I know there are a lot of other things that prove the Pentagon was a
>> >BIG LIE but I like the fact that one of the Crisis Actors had to say a 757
>> >folded it's wings back to go into the small hole in the wall.
>>
>> There were no crisis actors. This lie of yours has been exposed a
>> few times. You should cease offering it.
>
>Don't pretend we weren't warned.
>
Is something bad going to happen to me?
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzoC01dFXHU
>
>It's all for the best.
>
I don't see the connection between the 9/11 attacks and
"Godspell." You'll need to point it out.
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4V5KaicVg34
>
So Blue Oyster Cult was behind the attacks?
> Flights of black horseman soar over churches
> Pursued by an army of birds in the rain
> None of them can see the clouds, the polished wings don't care
> Animal ways through the hazy dreams full of pain
>
>The flight of the two helpless planes over the 'churches' of Wall Street,
>followed by the Air Force interceptors overriding controlling their flight.
>
> Wings wetted down, stumbling on the ground
> It all turns around, in the end
> The voices sound deadly, sometimes I hear
> Echoes of empires, spread throughout the sky
>
>The towers crashing to the ground, a seeming blow to the American financial
>empire (World _Trade_ Center). Actually the bankers prosperred lending money to
>the US government and arms manufacturers ramping up production.
>
> Wings wetted down, stumbling on the ground
> It all turns around, in the end
>
> Flights of black horseman soar over churches
> Pursued by an army of birds in the rain
> Wings wetted down, stumbling on the ground
> It all turns around, in the end
>
>It turned around American attitudes about Iraq, as Bush and the IJC intended.
>
Do you happen to know the exact time you lost all contact with
reality?
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylMaRaYc6mM
>
That song is from the 60's. It can have NO connection to the 9/11
attacks.
> White bird,
> in a golden cage,
> on a winter's day,
> in the rain.
>
>A metaphorical winter's day.
>
The lyrics state it was a winter's day. No metaphors present.
Additionally, it wasn't raining in NYC on 9/11/01.
> White bird,
> in a golden cage,
> alone.
>
>Only one cruise missile would be used against the Pentagon.
>
And yet, none were.
Odd that.
[snip the remainder of the k00k babble]
If you believe what you've posted to be true, you should seek the
help of a mental health care professional. If you're simply trolling,
well, I hope you get something for getting me to reply to your troll
rant.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 09:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <chine.bleu-ECAA7E.09363923082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #516072 |
In article <g9jjtad91ileg5gef6dbsqrnel118vjkqg@4ax.com>, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzoC01dFXHU > > > >It's all for the best. > > > > I don't see the connection between the 9/11 attacks and > "Godspell." You'll need to point it out. He's no fun. He fell right over. -- :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' When is a Kenyan not a Kenyan? When he's a Canadian. That's People's Commissioner Siri Cruz now. Punch!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 14:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ge6ktah2kqjtnptsg5veuou48eitqv9g0i@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516110 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 09:36:39 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>In article <g9jjtad91ileg5gef6dbsqrnel118vjkqg@4ax.com>,
> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzoC01dFXHU
>> >
>> >It's all for the best.
>>
>> I don't see the connection between the 9/11 attacks and
>> "Godspell." You'll need to point it out.
>
>He's no fun. He fell right over.
Wait! Didn't I say that on the other side of the record?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 13:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <chine.bleu-5B9451.13030723082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #516211 |
In article <ge6ktah2kqjtnptsg5veuou48eitqv9g0i@4ax.com>, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 09:36:39 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > >In article <g9jjtad91ileg5gef6dbsqrnel118vjkqg@4ax.com>, > > "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzoC01dFXHU > >> > > >> >It's all for the best. > >> > >> I don't see the connection between the 9/11 attacks and > >> "Godspell." You'll need to point it out. > > > >He's no fun. He fell right over. > > Wait! Didn't I say that on the other side of the record? Just because I see a pattern doesn't mean the pattern is there. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/patternicity-finding-meaningful-pattern s/ -- :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' When is a Kenyan not a Kenyan? When he's a Canadian. That's People's Commissioner Siri Cruz now. Punch!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 11:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3045097e3b4861d598c23d@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516072 |
In article <g9jjtad91ileg5gef6dbsqrnel118vjkqg@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 05:09:17 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > >In article <ifcjta9pca3jrge9qr3gaapqt40375vfiq@4ax.com>, > > "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> >WTF??? I know there are a lot of other things that prove the Pentagon was a > >> >BIG LIE but I like the fact that one of the Crisis Actors had to say a 757 > >> >folded it's wings back to go into the small hole in the wall. > >> > >> There were no crisis actors. This lie of yours has been exposed a > >> few times. You should cease offering it. > > > >Don't pretend we weren't warned. > > > > Is something bad going to happen to me? > > >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzoC01dFXHU > > > >It's all for the best. > > > > I don't see the connection between the 9/11 attacks and > "Godspell." You'll need to point it out. > > > > >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4V5KaicVg34 > > > > So Blue Oyster Cult was behind the attacks? > > > Flights of black horseman soar over churches > > Pursued by an army of birds in the rain > > None of them can see the clouds, the polished wings don't care > > Animal ways through the hazy dreams full of pain > > > >The flight of the two helpless planes over the 'churches' of Wall Street, > >followed by the Air Force interceptors overriding controlling their flight. > > > > Wings wetted down, stumbling on the ground > > It all turns around, in the end > > The voices sound deadly, sometimes I hear > > Echoes of empires, spread throughout the sky > > > >The towers crashing to the ground, a seeming blow to the American financial > >empire (World _Trade_ Center). Actually the bankers prosperred lending money to > >the US government and arms manufacturers ramping up production. > > > > Wings wetted down, stumbling on the ground > > It all turns around, in the end > > > > Flights of black horseman soar over churches > > Pursued by an army of birds in the rain > > Wings wetted down, stumbling on the ground > > It all turns around, in the end > > > >It turned around American attitudes about Iraq, as Bush and the IJC intended. > > > > Do you happen to know the exact time you lost all contact with > reality? > WTF is it with kOOks and their linking songs to their delusions? > > > >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylMaRaYc6mM > > > > That song is from the 60's. It can have NO connection to the 9/11 > attacks. > > > White bird, > > in a golden cage, > > on a winter's day, > > in the rain. > > > >A metaphorical winter's day. > > > > The lyrics state it was a winter's day. No metaphors present. > Additionally, it wasn't raining in NYC on 9/11/01. > > > White bird, > > in a golden cage, > > alone. > > > >Only one cruise missile would be used against the Pentagon. > > > > And yet, none were. > Odd that. > > [snip the remainder of the k00k babble] > > If you believe what you've posted to be true, you should seek the > help of a mental health care professional. If you're simply trolling, > well, I hope you get something for getting me to reply to your troll > rant. The poor kOOk... -- BDK: Head Government Shill, and future Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 5 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 19:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vbfnta98up4hehg5g1h71am0iht022kk37@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516477 |
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:59:51 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:
[...]
>> >It turned around American attitudes about Iraq, as Bush and the IJC intended.
>>
>> Do you happen to know the exact time you lost all contact with
>> reality?
>
>WTF is it with kOOks and their linking songs to their delusions?
>
Well, you see, the conspiracy has been happening for many, many
years. In fact, and I probably shouldn't mention this, one of the
Pilgrims was rumored to be a member of the Masons.
Duuun duuun DUUUUUUUN!
[...]
>> [snip the remainder of the k00k babble]
>>
>> If you believe what you've posted to be true, you should seek the
>> help of a mental health care professional. If you're simply trolling,
>> well, I hope you get something for getting me to reply to your troll
>> rant.
>
>The poor kOOk...
If s/he believes it. I haven't read enough of siri's posts to be
able to make an actual determination.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 21:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <8341507f0ecf4d029cceaa0de7804346@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #515799 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:KvidnQVn8rrGNkXInZ2dnUU7-K2dnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> >> <http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/nodebris.html> > RO<SMACKAKOOK!> Until you are able to prove that your kooky conspiracy theory is able to violate the laws of physics, you will continue to be treated as the retard everyone knows you to be, Retard. Kook. LOL >> <http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/> > Ye<SMACKAKOOK!> Stop avoiding providing that proof, Ko0kTard. The laws of physics are immutable, you cannot get around them. If you k'lame to have done so, you are either lying or insane. You choose which. Kook. LOL >> <http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/conclusions/debris.html> > H<SMACKAKOOK!> Stupid delusional fuckwits who can't discern reality from fantasy, who have broken little underpowered brains that continually change their kooky conspiracy theory as an attempt at weaseling their way toward some semblance of plausibility will be pointed at, laughed at and their stupid drooling mouths slapped shut until they can prove they're not either lying or insane when they state their kooky conspiracy theory can violate the laws of physics. Kook. LOL >> <http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm> > Wha<SMACKAKOOK!> Your simply dismissing reality doesn't change reality, Delusional Idiot. Kook. LOL >> Look at all those photos showing plane debris, both outside and >> *inside* the Pentagon. Hull pieces, the wheel rim of (surprise! >> surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, a chunk of (surprise! >> surprise! surprise! the Boeing 757 nose cone that actually >> punched all the way through to A-E Drive, turbine compressor >> parts from (surprise! surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, and a >> shitload of small plane chunks directly in front of the building, >> exactly as one would expect from those once-together chunks >> slamming into and through concrete at 400 MPH. And that's not to >> mention the eyewitnesses *and* video of the crash. >> >> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html> > I<SMACKAKOOK!> You've thus far failed to provide any evidence whatsoever that didn't violate the laws of physics, to support your retardation. Thus, you are either insane or lying. You choose which. Kook. LOL >> And wouldn't you know it, the pre-collapse punch-through hole on >> the outer Pentagon matches what one would expect to see from a >> 757 hitting it at near ground level... that pilot was relying on >> ground effect to keep the aircraft just off the ground, and >> rammed it in at full throttle. >> >> Here's what the hole in the Pentagon looked like: >> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_precollapse-marked.jpg> >> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_boeing_large.jpg> > Pi<SMACKAKOOK!> That your broken brain is now squealing in pain because it is being forced to confront reality would be all an intelligent person needs to ascertain that their brain is broken... that you cannot ascertain this means you're insane *and* stupid. Kook. LOL >> You'll note the starboard wing was clipped by the generator unit, > W<SMACKAKOOK!> Get to refuting all that scientific evidence proving you're an insane frothing-at-the-mouth nutter, and while you're at it, get right on answering the 16 points for which your kooky conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics. Kook. LOL >> shortening the length of the starboard wing punch-through hole to >> the right of the main body punch-through hole. > An<SMACKAKOOK!> Delusional blather-spewing tards will have no other option than to shut the fuck up and reconcile themselves to the fact that their broken brains are inadequate to properly process reality. Kook. LOL >> Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural >> engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped >> coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, >> and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural >> Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing >> on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with >> the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section >> of the plane, and I found the black box." > Too<SMACKAKOOK!> Until you are able to address the points for which your kooky conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics, until you are able to provide even one shred of credible scientific proof to support your insane conspiracy theory, you will be minimized, put down, laughed at and treated as the retard we all know you to be. Kook. LOL > Lo<SMACKAKOOK!> Don't purport to know anything about me but what I tell you, you delusional fuckwit. Now get to providing that evidence to support your delusion, or admit you're insane. Kook. LOL > Sti<SMACKAKOOK!> You'll get right on explaining exactly how anything can be "damaged by a CGI", and providing irrefutable scientific proof that any CGI existed. Until you do that, along with providing an explanation as to how your kooky conspiracy theory can violate several laws of physics, you are de facto insane. That you cannot refute this reality stands as your tacit admission to *being* insane. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 16 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. 12) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 13) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 14) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes (now 34 nukes, per your latest k'lame) you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 15) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 16) Explain how these 19 nukes (now 34 nukes per your latest k'lame) could tunnel holes from their underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). ====================================================== There are now 16 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the video *you* *provided* between the video disturbance due to satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (depending upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission... and since we're talking solid bedrock here, it'd be at the upper end of that scale). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain is now saying there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you know there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble or its vicinity. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" on the video *you* *provided* and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So you've proven by skirting the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman imitation. I can twist your brain into a pretzel with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 19:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rvidnZH-WKV0i0TInZ2dnUU7-Q-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515834 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:8341507f0ecf4d029cceaa0de7804346@dizum.com... First back to the OP. You completely overlooked the fact that Mike Walter felt pressured to explain why people could have played golf on the lawn of the Pentagon even after there was supposed to have been a commercial airliner wreck there. <G> And you have got to stop thinking about birds going into a birdhouse because only birds can do what Mike Walter describes the alleged 757 doing. And for the sake of the argument lets say that the 757 really folded it's wings back to disappear into a small hole in the wall. Now where did both engines go when the metal engines are made of doesn't just burn up? <G> Yep, they forget to plant a second engine and they also forgot to use explosives in two places in the wall for their verisimilitude. > Your simply dismissing reality doesn't change reality, Delusional > Idiot. Not hardly. I'm dismissing an alleged commercial airliner crash that does not resemble a real commercial airliner crash and even had to use parts from a crash site in Brazil to add to the verisimilitude. > You've thus far failed to provide any evidence whatsoever that > didn't violate the laws of physics, to support your retardation. > Thus, you are either insane or lying. You choose which. WTF? I have no idea what you talking about because you removed my comment and I already know you are full of it so why should I go back and see what my comment was? >>> You'll note the starboard wing was clipped by the generator unit, > >> W<SMACKAKOOK!> > > Get to refuting all that scientific evidence proving you're an > insane frothing-at-the-mouth nutter, and while you're at it, get > right on answering the 16 points for which your kooky conspiracy > theory violates the laws of physics. "scientific evidence?" Dude there was a clear photo of the unit you are talking about dumping out smoke all over the place so there was nothing scientific about it when it was just evidence. > Until you are able to address the points for which your kooky > conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics You mean your laws of physics where 3 buildings can fall from 66% freefall to 100% freefall without using explosives? And then all you have to do is look at the remains of the Twin Towers and the fact the media called the place "Ground Zero" to know that nukes were used at "Ground Zero" because of the pre-9/11 meaning of "Ground Zero." Or is that way over your head too? > Now, get to addressing the 16 ways your kook conspiracy theory > violates the laws of physics: You are so fcuking funny because you try your best to make it look like nukes were not the reason Ground Zero was called Ground Zero that you fail to mention the similarities between what a nuke leaves behind and what was left behind of the Twin Towers. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 17:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8n7qtr.f2a.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #515921 |
Rocky wrote: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message > news:8341507f0ecf4d029cceaa0de7804346@dizum.com... > > First back to the OP. You completely overlooked the fact that Mike > Walter felt pressured to explain why people could have played golf on > the lawn of the Pentagon even after there was supposed to have been a > commercial airliner wreck there. <G> > > And you have got to stop thinking about birds going into a birdhouse > because only birds can do what Mike Walter describes the alleged 757 > doing. > > And for the sake of the argument lets say that the 757 really folded > it's wings back to disappear into a small hole in the wall. Now > where did both engines go when the metal engines are made of doesn't > just burn up? <G> Yep, they forget to plant a second engine and they > also forgot to use explosives in two places in the wall for their > verisimilitude. > > >> Your simply dismissing reality doesn't change reality, Delusional >> Idiot. > > Not hardly. I'm dismissing an alleged commercial airliner crash that > does not resemble a real commercial airliner crash and even had to > use parts from a crash site in Brazil to add to the verisimilitude. > > >> You've thus far failed to provide any evidence whatsoever that >> didn't violate the laws of physics, to support your retardation. >> Thus, you are either insane or lying. You choose which. > > WTF? I have no idea what you talking about because you removed my > comment and I already know you are full of it so why should I go back > and see what my comment was? > > >>>> You'll note the starboard wing was clipped by the generator unit, >> >>> W<SMACKAKOOK!> >> >> Get to refuting all that scientific evidence proving you're an >> insane frothing-at-the-mouth nutter, and while you're at it, get >> right on answering the 16 points for which your kooky conspiracy >> theory violates the laws of physics. > > "scientific evidence?" Dude there was a clear photo of the unit you > are talking about dumping out smoke all over the place so there was > nothing scientific about it when it was just evidence. > > >> Until you are able to address the points for which your kooky >> conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics > > You mean your laws of physics where 3 buildings can fall from 66% > freefall to 100% freefall without using explosives? > > And then all you have to do is look at the remains of the Twin Towers > and the fact the media called the place "Ground Zero" to know that > nukes were used at "Ground Zero" because of the pre-9/11 meaning of > "Ground Zero." Or is that way over your head too? > > >> Now, get to addressing the 16 ways your kook conspiracy theory >> violates the laws of physics: > > You are so fcuking funny because you try your best to make it look > like nukes were not the reason Ground Zero was called Ground Zero > that you fail to mention the similarities between what a nuke leaves > behind and what was left behind of the Twin Towers. <G> > > Rocky why are you the only one that believes what you say
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 20:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pO-dncFNVJvOg0TInZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515923 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8n7qtr.f2a.17.1@news.alt.net... > Rocky wrote: >> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message >> news:8341507f0ecf4d029cceaa0de7804346@dizum.com... First back to the OP. >> You completely overlooked the fact that Mike >> Walter felt pressured to explain why people could have played golf on >> the lawn of the Pentagon even after there was supposed to have been a >> commercial airliner wreck there. <G> >> >> And you have got to stop thinking about birds going into a birdhouse >> because only birds can do what Mike Walter describes the alleged 757 >> doing. And for the sake of the argument lets say that the 757 really >> folded >> it's wings back to disappear into a small hole in the wall. Now >> where did both engines go when the metal engines are made of doesn't >> just burn up? <G> Yep, they forget to plant a second engine and they >> also forgot to use explosives in two places in the wall for their >> verisimilitude. >>> Your simply dismissing reality doesn't change reality, Delusional >>> Idiot. >> >> Not hardly. I'm dismissing an alleged commercial airliner crash that >> does not resemble a real commercial airliner crash and even had to >> use parts from a crash site in Brazil to add to the verisimilitude. >> >> >>> You've thus far failed to provide any evidence whatsoever that >>> didn't violate the laws of physics, to support your retardation. >>> Thus, you are either insane or lying. You choose which. >> >> WTF? I have no idea what you talking about because you removed my >> comment and I already know you are full of it so why should I go back >> and see what my comment was? >> >> >>>>> You'll note the starboard wing was clipped by the generator unit, >>> >>>> W<SMACKAKOOK!> >>> >>> Get to refuting all that scientific evidence proving you're an >>> insane frothing-at-the-mouth nutter, and while you're at it, get >>> right on answering the 16 points for which your kooky conspiracy >>> theory violates the laws of physics. >> >> "scientific evidence?" Dude there was a clear photo of the unit you >> are talking about dumping out smoke all over the place so there was >> nothing scientific about it when it was just evidence. >> >> >>> Until you are able to address the points for which your kooky >>> conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics >> >> You mean your laws of physics where 3 buildings can fall from 66% >> freefall to 100% freefall without using explosives? >> >> And then all you have to do is look at the remains of the Twin Towers >> and the fact the media called the place "Ground Zero" to know that >> nukes were used at "Ground Zero" because of the pre-9/11 meaning of >> "Ground Zero." Or is that way over your head too? >> >> >>> Now, get to addressing the 16 ways your kook conspiracy theory >>> violates the laws of physics: >> >> You are so fcuking funny because you try your best to make it look >> like nukes were not the reason Ground Zero was called Ground Zero >> that you fail to mention the similarities between what a nuke leaves >> behind and what was left behind of the Twin Towers. <G> >> >> Rocky > > why are you the only one that believes what you say https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 18:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8n7ue9.u0j.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #515927 |
Rocky wrote: > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8n7qtr.f2a.17.1@news.alt.net... >> Rocky wrote: >>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message >>> news:8341507f0ecf4d029cceaa0de7804346@dizum.com... First back to >>> the OP. You completely overlooked the fact that Mike >>> Walter felt pressured to explain why people could have played golf >>> on the lawn of the Pentagon even after there was supposed to have >>> been a commercial airliner wreck there. <G> >>> >>> And you have got to stop thinking about birds going into a birdhouse >>> because only birds can do what Mike Walter describes the alleged 757 >>> doing. And for the sake of the argument lets say that the 757 really >>> folded >>> it's wings back to disappear into a small hole in the wall. Now >>> where did both engines go when the metal engines are made of doesn't >>> just burn up? <G> Yep, they forget to plant a second engine and >>> they also forgot to use explosives in two places in the wall for >>> their verisimilitude. >>>> Your simply dismissing reality doesn't change reality, Delusional >>>> Idiot. >>> >>> Not hardly. I'm dismissing an alleged commercial airliner crash >>> that does not resemble a real commercial airliner crash and even >>> had to >>> use parts from a crash site in Brazil to add to the verisimilitude. >>> >>> >>>> You've thus far failed to provide any evidence whatsoever that >>>> didn't violate the laws of physics, to support your retardation. >>>> Thus, you are either insane or lying. You choose which. >>> >>> WTF? I have no idea what you talking about because you removed my >>> comment and I already know you are full of it so why should I go >>> back and see what my comment was? >>> >>> >>>>>> You'll note the starboard wing was clipped by the generator unit, >>>> >>>>> W<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>> >>>> Get to refuting all that scientific evidence proving you're an >>>> insane frothing-at-the-mouth nutter, and while you're at it, get >>>> right on answering the 16 points for which your kooky conspiracy >>>> theory violates the laws of physics. >>> >>> "scientific evidence?" Dude there was a clear photo of the unit you >>> are talking about dumping out smoke all over the place so there was >>> nothing scientific about it when it was just evidence. >>> >>> >>>> Until you are able to address the points for which your kooky >>>> conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics >>> >>> You mean your laws of physics where 3 buildings can fall from 66% >>> freefall to 100% freefall without using explosives? >>> >>> And then all you have to do is look at the remains of the Twin >>> Towers and the fact the media called the place "Ground Zero" to >>> know that nukes were used at "Ground Zero" because of the pre-9/11 >>> meaning of "Ground Zero." Or is that way over your head too? >>> >>> >>>> Now, get to addressing the 16 ways your kook conspiracy theory >>>> violates the laws of physics: >>> >>> You are so fcuking funny because you try your best to make it look >>> like nukes were not the reason Ground Zero was called Ground Zero >>> that you fail to mention the similarities between what a nuke leaves >>> behind and what was left behind of the Twin Towers. <G> >>> >>> Rocky >> >> why are you the only one that believes what you say > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question i don't go to the web sites you post
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 03:44 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <368d1d0b1b0c2331f0d1ef6fda619169@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #515921 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:rvidnZH-WKV0i0TInZ2dnUU7-Q-dnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:8341507f0ecf4d029cceaa0de7804346@dizum.com... > F<SMACKAKOOK!> You are retarded, gullible and insane. What you say makes no sense because it is wholly impossible. It violates the laws of physics in several ways. Therefore, you will shut the fuck up until you can explain how your kooky conspiracy theory is able to circumvent the laws of physics. Barring that, you will simply shut the fuck up. Kook. LOL >> Your simply dismissing reality doesn't change reality, Delusional >> Idiot. > N<SMACKAKOOK!> Your simply dismissing reality doesn't change reality, Delusional Idiot. Kook. LOL >> You've thus far failed to provide any evidence whatsoever that >> didn't violate the laws of physics, to support your retardation. >> Thus, you are either insane or lying. You choose which. > W<SMACKAKOOK!> Until you are able to cogently explain how your broken-brained little tard-theory is able to violate the laws of physics, you'll merely be laughed at as the broken-brained simpleton that you are. Kook. LOL >>>> You'll note the starboard wing was clipped by the generator unit, >>> W<SMACKAKOOK!> >> Get to refuting all that scientific evidence proving you're an >> insane frothing-at-the-mouth nutter, and while you're at it, get >> right on answering the 16 points for which your kooky conspiracy >> theory violates the laws of physics. > "sci<SMACKAKOOK!> Your evasive tardblather isn't proof of any sort. Your kooky conspiracy scenario is wholly impossible because it violates the immutable laws of physics. Therefore, you've proven yourself to be psychotic. Take your meds and try harder. Kook. LOL >> Until you are able to address the points for which your kooky >> conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics > Y<SMACKAKOOK!> Your continued evasion of providing any sort of scientific proof to back up your retarded blather which violates several laws of physics is noted as the non-proof evasive blather that it is. Kook. LOL >> Now, get to addressing the 16 ways your kook conspiracy theory >> violates the laws of physics: > Yo<SMACKAKOOK!> No nukes were used at the WTC, ever. You've not proven a single one of your retarded contentions. All you've done is proven how incredibly stupid, insane and gullible you are. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 16 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL ====================================================== There are now 16 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 20:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Lo6dnaLtv-liu0TInZ2dnUU7-UWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515930 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:368d1d0b1b0c2331f0d1ef6fda619169@dizum.com... > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> There is no doubt that you are spinning. Now how about facing the facts for once? Ok, let me test your brain. What tell tale signs are in the following photo? http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg And I'll even help you by breaking the question down a bit. Why does the photo above not support a jet fuel collapse? Why does the photo above not support a Controlled Demolition? Why does the photo above support the use of deep underground nukes? And this is even an open newsgroup test where you can leave your newsreader open. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 05:18 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <e0c6769400198081ac8ed5fd1af80ef8@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #515935 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:Lo6dnaLtv-liu0TInZ2dnUU7-UWdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:368d1d0b1b0c2331f0d1ef6fda619169@dizum.com... >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > T<SMACKAKOOK!> Your broken brain is expanding upon your delusion from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words), to "the nukes could dig through miles of bedrock in seconds", to "there weren't 3 nukes, there were 19!", and now to "34 NUKES! OMG! THERE WERE 34 NUKES!". And yet you don't see how insane you sound. That you are utterly unable to provide any proof of your retarded contentions, that your broken brain keeps changing your kooky conspiracy theory in a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility, that you cannot see how insane you are... these are all signs that you are too stupid, gullible and psychotic to discern fantasy from reality. Therefore, you will continue to be belittled as the uneducated insane idiotic mouth-breather that you are, until you are able to provide corroborable scientific evidence of your utterly impossible conspiracy theory. Until such time, if you find yourself unable to stop spewing your retardation, you will have your flapping toothless jaw slapped shut each and every time you open it to drool out more of your stupidity. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 16 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL ====================================================== There are now 16 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 05:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1a2oac-n4t.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #515935 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > There is no doubt that you are spinning. Now how about facing the facts for > once? The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the windows is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is kook babble. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 06:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2hcjtahfhqefkjpg4phdblu168qqqb4pim@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515935 |
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 20:50:15 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>wrote in message news:368d1d0b1b0c2331f0d1ef6fda619169@dizum.com...
>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
>There is no doubt that you are spinning. Now how about facing the facts for
>once?
>
>Ok, let me test your brain.
>
>What tell tale signs are in the following photo?
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
There are ample tell tale signs that the buildings each
experienced an uncontrolled collapse. The picture you link to proves
the buildings fell due to an uncontrolled collapse. Sadly, you are
truly unable to understand this.
>And I'll even help you by breaking the question down a bit.
>
>Why does the photo above not support a jet fuel collapse?
>
Because jet fuel alone did not cause the collapse.
Why do you insist on lying and claiming jet fuel alone caused it?
>Why does the photo above not support a Controlled Demolition?
>
Because it wasn't a controlled demolition. The surviving corners
prove this.
>Why does the photo above support the use of deep underground nukes?
>
It doesn't.
>And this is even an open newsgroup test where you can leave your newsreader
>open. <G>
Huh?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 05:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <382oac-n4t.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #515921 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: <snip kook babble> > And then all you have to do is look at the remains of the Twin Towers and > the fact the media called the place "Ground Zero" to know that nukes were > used at "Ground Zero" because of the pre-9/11 meaning of "Ground Zero." Or > is that way over your head too? When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ming Tiggle" <none@nomail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 21:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mr8v5t$6sf$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #515667 |
For those of you who want to see the video clip where Mike Walter describes the wings of the alleged Flight 77 folding it's wings back like a bird going Apostrophe's and they're use's, you blithering fuckwit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 05:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1nigtadt4gv2ta4r6chlc8ugrgmk6ms7bi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515719 |
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 21:52:22 -0700, "Ming Tiggle" <none@nomail.com>
wrote:
>For those of you who want to see the video clip where Mike Walter describes
>the wings of the alleged Flight 77 folding it's wings back like a bird going
>
>Apostrophe's and they're use's, you blithering fuckwit.
>
It's important to keep in mind that Rocky has a learning
disability. That's not an insult, though I would understand if someone
were to think it is. I offer a very real comment about Rocky as he
presents himself.
It is possible Rocky is acting. But I doubt Dustin Hoffman could
act so well for such a long period of time.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ming Tiggle" <none@nomail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 21:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mr8v8b$6ul$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #515667 |
For those of you who want to see the video clip where Mike Walter describes the wings of the alleged Flight 77 folding it's wings Learn how to spell simple three-letter English words, idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web