Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #515667 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-21 17:22 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-25 09:50 -0700 |
| Articles | 7 on this page of 87 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 17:22 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-08-21 18:54 -0400
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 22:56 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-21 18:59 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:44 +0200
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 11:48 -0400
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 18:47 +0200
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 15:08 -0400
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:46 +0200
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:06 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:54 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 04:07 +0200
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:21 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-23 03:59 -0400
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 17:43 +0200
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 12:04 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 17:23 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:44 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:23 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:43 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 14:36 -0400
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:54 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:54 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:53 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:01 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 21:02 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:49 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:26 +0000
? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 05:42 -0500
Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 04:07 -0700
2 je suis charly was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:52 -0500
Re: 2 je suis charly was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:28 -0700
Re: 2 je suis charly was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:20 +0000
Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 12:15 +0100
Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:23 -0500
seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:35 -0500
Re: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:42 -0500
Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:05 -0500
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
T-annoy the pain keeps keeps the bullshit going (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:53 -0500
Re: T-annoy the pain keeps keeps the bullshit going jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:19 +0000
Re: T-annoy the pain keeps keeps the bullshit going Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:13 +0000
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:04 -0500
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:18 -0500
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 19:50 +0000
Jim the bullshitter keeps bullshitting "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:28 -0500
Re: Jim the bullshitter keeps bullshitting jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:40 +0000
Re: Jim the bullshitter keeps bullshitting je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:20 -0700
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:08 -0500
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:03 -0500
Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
Re: seismic evidence is inconsistent jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:11 +0000
Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:46 -0500
Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:08 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:45 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:24 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:44 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 05:09 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:40 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 09:36 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:07 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 13:03 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-24 11:59 -0400
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:57 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:35 +0200
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:41 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 17:55 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:13 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:55 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 03:44 +0200
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:50 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 05:18 +0200
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:29 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:45 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:28 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Ming Tiggle" <none@nomail.com> - 2015-08-21 21:52 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:12 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Ming Tiggle" <none@nomail.com> - 2015-08-21 21:53 -0700
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:55 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:54 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:11 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:21 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:30 +0000
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:44 -0500
Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:50 -0700
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 09:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <T7qdnTAfgYqBEEXInZ2dnUU7-aGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515720 |
"Ming Tiggle" <none@nomail.com> wrote in message news:mr8v8b$6ul$1@speranza.aioe.org... > For those of you who want to see the video clip where Mike Walter > describes the wings of the alleged Flight 77 folding it's wings > > Learn how to spell simple three-letter English words, idiot. WTF? How's that?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 12:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nqdhta1fdfkfik81ie3h0b7jttbgc7cdf3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515776 |
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:55:51 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"Ming Tiggle" <none@nomail.com> wrote in message
>news:mr8v8b$6ul$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>> For those of you who want to see the video clip where Mike Walter
>> describes the wings of the alleged Flight 77 folding it's wings
>>
>> Learn how to spell simple three-letter English words, idiot.
>
>WTF? How's that?
>
You wrote it's when you should have written its.
I excuse it because of your very real learning disability. It
appears Ming is not so forgiving.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 05:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <omigtapiq3ta8d25lcru68vvaat7n6nbia@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515667 |
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:22:57 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>For those of you who want to see the video clip where Mike Walter describes
>the wings of the alleged Flight 77 folding it's wings back like a bird going
>into a birdhouse see:
>
>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness Mike Walter
>( Time indexed to start at 2:01 )
> https://youtu.be/f0vxc50xAbk?t=2m1s
>
>That story is so stupid and it is clear Mike wasn't just a bad "Crisis
>Actor" but he was worried he might not get to keep his job if he don't add
>to his big lies.
>
>Fact is a missile hit the Pentagon, a missile crashed in Pranksville, PA and
>two CGIs rammed into the Twin Towers where the Twin Towers were finished off
>by deep underground nukes and hence the term "Ground Zero." DUH.
>
>While people died that number too was a crock pot of you know what.
>
>Too bad there are too many TV Huggers out there.
It is far easier to use a lame pejorative (TV Huggers) than to
accept the truth, eh?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 20:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1bednZadq8C0vUTInZ2dnUU7-emdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515754 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:omigtapiq3ta8d25lcru68vvaat7n6nbia@4ax.com... > On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:22:57 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>For those of you who want to see the video clip where Mike Walter >>describes >>the wings of the alleged Flight 77 folding it's wings back like a bird >>going >>into a birdhouse see: >> >>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness Mike Walter >>( Time indexed to start at 2:01 ) >> https://youtu.be/f0vxc50xAbk?t=2m1s >> >>That story is so stupid and it is clear Mike wasn't just a bad "Crisis >>Actor" but he was worried he might not get to keep his job if he don't add >>to his big lies. >> >>Fact is a missile hit the Pentagon, a missile crashed in Pranksville, PA >>and >>two CGIs rammed into the Twin Towers where the Twin Towers were finished >>off >>by deep underground nukes and hence the term "Ground Zero." DUH. >> >>While people died that number too was a crock pot of you know what. >> >>Too bad there are too many TV Huggers out there. > > It is far easier to use a lame pejorative (TV Huggers) than to > accept the truth, eh? Accept the truth? You mean truth from a Television Set Hugger? The fact remains ever since 9/11 I've had no reason to believe a commercial airliner crashed at Pranksville, PA or the Pentagon. And after seeing the only way to recreate the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 then it is clear that two CGIs were flown into the Twin Towers. And after being told why just certain parts of the Twin Towers survived now I know the real reason why Ground Zero was properly called "Ground Zero." See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 05:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ob2oac-n4t.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #515928 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Accept the truth? You mean truth from a Television Set Hugger? The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the windows is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is kook babble. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 06:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <fgcjta1g706kclvvgd120okp9978on5o42@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515928 |
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 20:21:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:omigtapiq3ta8d25lcru68vvaat7n6nbia@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:22:57 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>For those of you who want to see the video clip where Mike Walter
>>>describes
>>>the wings of the alleged Flight 77 folding it's wings back like a bird
>>>going into a birdhouse see:
>>>
>>>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness Mike Walter
>>>( Time indexed to start at 2:01 )
>>> https://youtu.be/f0vxc50xAbk?t=2m1s
>>>
>>>That story is so stupid and it is clear Mike wasn't just a bad "Crisis
>>>Actor" but he was worried he might not get to keep his job if he don't add
>>>to his big lies.
>>>
>>>Fact is a missile hit the Pentagon, a missile crashed in Pranksville, PA
>>>and
>>>two CGIs rammed into the Twin Towers where the Twin Towers were finished
>>>off by deep underground nukes and hence the term "Ground Zero." DUH.
>>>
>>>While people died that number too was a crock pot of you know what.
>>>
>>>Too bad there are too many TV Huggers out there.
>>
>> It is far easier to use a lame pejorative (TV Huggers) than to
>> accept the truth, eh?
>
>Accept the truth? You mean truth from a Television Set Hugger?
>
You continue to prove my claim accurate.
>The fact remains ever since 9/11 I've had no reason to believe a commercial
>airliner crashed at Pranksville, PA or the Pentagon.
>
That's because your very real learning disability makes it too
difficult for you to accept the truth.
>And after seeing the only way to recreate the disappearing wing on the
>alleged Flight 175 then it is clear that two CGIs were flown into the Twin
>Towers.
But the wing did not disappear. I was able to PROVE this using
the video you used to link to.
>
>And after being told why just certain parts of the Twin Towers survived now
>I know the real reason why Ground Zero was properly called "Ground Zero."
>See:
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
You still don't understand how that picture PROVES your claims
wrong? Several people have explained it to you. I must conclude none
were able to dumb it down to your intellectual level.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 09:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <83159a17-b3fe-4bd9-944f-6ca35fc2a2c6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #515928 |
well, this is really my sole area of expertise, "airframe & powerplant; maybr, you dhould ask another of us > The fact remains ever since 9/11 I've had no reason to believe a commercial > airliner crashed at Pranksville, PA or the Pentagon. > > And after seeing the only way to recreate the disappearing wing on the > alleged Flight 175 then it is clear that two CGIs were flown into the Twin > Towers. > > And after being told why just certain parts of the Twin Towers survived now > I know the real reason why Ground Zero was properly called "Ground Zero." > See: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web