Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #680176 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-04-07 10:33 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-04-11 10:46 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 191 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-07 10:33 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 09:48 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-07 11:23 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 10:33 -0500
" Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-07 12:05 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-07 17:51 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 18:26 -0700
" Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-07 20:40 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 20:52 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-07 21:00 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-08 04:05 +0000
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 21:07 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 21:06 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-08 07:24 +0200
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-08 11:54 -0400
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 12:29 -0400
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 19:33 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-09 21:06 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-10 08:32 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-07 11:43 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 12:34 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 12:52 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-07 11:58 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-08 16:55 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-09 21:10 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-12 06:40 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-11 19:24 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-12 19:59 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-15 08:13 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-15 08:48 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 11:19 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-08 16:54 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 09:04 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 11:29 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 12:22 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 11:22 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 12:17 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 12:29 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 23:46 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 14:10 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 11:28 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 11:32 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 11:05 -0500
Air causes cancer. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-09 10:54 -0700
Re: Air causes cancer. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 17:29 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-09 13:12 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 14:29 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-09 13:33 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 16:44 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-11 23:45 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-12 16:46 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-12 15:03 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-12 20:11 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-14 11:11 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-14 09:18 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-14 21:31 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-15 12:50 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-12 10:12 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-12 20:06 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-15 00:48 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-15 18:03 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 08:58 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 02:00 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 19:11 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 09:57 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 13:01 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-17 07:17 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:44 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-17 14:08 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 11:35 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-17 17:55 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-18 06:00 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-17 22:40 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-18 09:15 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 20:03 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 19:32 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 01:36 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 18:46 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 22:36 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 11:01 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 11:33 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 11:21 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 10:59 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-18 16:02 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 23:47 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-18 18:49 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-19 18:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-19 23:39 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 16:45 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 16:57 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-20 12:25 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 08:34 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 09:59 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 13:09 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-16 13:17 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-16 11:29 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 19:13 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-16 13:20 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 14:33 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:11 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-16 14:45 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Jews <jews@world-doomination.org> - 2018-04-16 17:11 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-17 01:34 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 13:04 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:07 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 16:59 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 22:31 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 15:46 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 20:50 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:46 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 05:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 21:14 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 12:47 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-16 14:43 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Jews <jews@world-doomination.org> - 2018-04-16 17:13 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson") <fsturluogh5@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 08:27 +0000
Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-16 15:25 -0700
Re: Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:51 -0500
Re: Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-16 22:24 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-04-18 00:22 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 21:39 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-04-18 05:21 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 13:37 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-18 14:55 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 23:48 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 18:56 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-19 11:44 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-19 18:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 11:06 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 11:34 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 12:20 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 19:14 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 14:56 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:13 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-09 04:33 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 06:17 +1000
Does smoking cause cancer? (was: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-09 01:43 +0200
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 09:57 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-09 02:02 +0200
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 10:12 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 19:36 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-09 03:45 +0200
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 23:50 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-08 20:12 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 11:40 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 23:56 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 14:05 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 11:27 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 07:36 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 17:01 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 08:14 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 21:09 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-10 08:34 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:51 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 11:52 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 17:22 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 07:36 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 17:13 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 08:23 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 19:43 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 11:02 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:58 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:40 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 21:08 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 12:40 +1000
Ben Jacoby is neither funny nor informative, nothing good. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-09 19:54 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 19:34 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-09 10:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-09 07:59 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-09 11:05 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 13:36 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 17:34 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 16:58 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Equalizer <coming4you@never.invalid.net> - 2018-04-09 22:58 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 17:39 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-09 13:05 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson") <fsturluogh5@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 21:27 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-11 10:27 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-04-10 11:25 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-04-10 16:48 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-10 08:50 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-10 16:58 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-11 23:47 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-11 17:53 -0600
In some Turkish bazar, somewhere... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-09 10:04 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 08:14 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:53 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-04-07 07:57 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 22:41 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 10:46 -0700
Page 8 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 Next page →
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-08 19:36 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <paecio$1r64$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #680384 |
On 4/8/2018 7:12 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 9/04/2018 10:02 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>
>>> So, I ask again: Why […] ignore benj's insanity?
>>
>> I did not.
>
> **Then feel free to post your response. I must have missed it.
>
>
he is/was already free.
by your own admission, you missed it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 03:45 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <1946525.GUh0CODmnK@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #680384 |
Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 9/04/2018 10:02 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> So, I ask again: Why […] ignore benj's insanity? >> I did not. > > **Then feel free to post your response. I must have missed it. You have missed that, by refuting your claims and source, I have also refuted the corresponding claim of “benj”, whom you quoted and I have in my killfile. Trying to convince an ignorant is a waste of time. Trying to convince a misguided person might be, too, but it is worth it. Informing the general public is always a good idea. Prefixing your own text with two asterisks is uncommon and unnecessary here. Address munging is anti-social and constitutes a violation of the first of the “Rules for usage” of your service provider, individual.net, where it also says: “Disregarding the rules may cause termination of access privileges without further notice. Amounts paid will not be refunded, neither partly nor in full.” You have been warned. I will not read more of your postings until the From header field value of your postings changes to an appropriate one (for me and others, that is a value according to RFC 5536, § 3.1.2., different to what individual.net falsely claims in section 5.3 of its FAQ). <http://www.interhack.net/pubs/munging-harmful/> *PLONK* F’up2 poster PointedEars -- Q: What did the nuclear physicist order for lunch? A: Fission chips. (from: WolframAlpha)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-08 23:50 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <aqByC.16775$FZ2.3667@fx33.iad> |
| In reply to | #680384 |
On 4/8/2018 8:12 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 9/04/2018 10:02 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Trevor Wilson wrote: >> >>> So, I ask again: Why […] ignore benj's insanity? >> >> I did not. > > **Then feel free to post your response. I must have missed it. > > Trevor, Life is something you've missed. Clean up your act and come join us!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-08 20:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <0belcd13hc6v6lvkl0huju5ddvvk8a1crc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #680380 |
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:57:03 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: > 'benj' claims to have many science degrees and yet, manages to come > out with the insane statement referenced above. Ben is, as I recall, a retired engineer. One of his favorite indoor sports is posting nonsense to the physics groups so he can watch the serious posters foam at the mouth. Although neither crazy nor stupid, he does have a pretty weird sense of humor. -- Goat
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 11:40 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <fivukjFspdU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #680395 |
On 9/04/2018 11:12 AM, Lofty Goat wrote: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:57:03 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: > >> 'benj' claims to have many science degrees and yet, manages to come >> out with the insane statement referenced above. > > Ben is, as I recall, a retired engineer. One of his favorite indoor > sports is posting nonsense to the physics groups so he can watch the > serious posters foam at the mouth. Although neither crazy nor stupid, > he does have a pretty weird sense of humor. > **I can only judge a person by their words and deeds. Judged by his words, benj is a moron. I don't know how you can claim that he is anything else, unless you know him, or have enjoyed a private communication with him. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-08 23:56 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <YvByC.32774$KZ2.12617@fx39.iad> |
| In reply to | #680396 |
On 4/8/2018 9:40 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 9/04/2018 11:12 AM, Lofty Goat wrote: >> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:57:03 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> >>> 'benj' claims to have many science degrees and yet, manages to come >>> out with the insane statement referenced above. >> >> Ben is, as I recall, a retired engineer. One of his favorite indoor >> sports is posting nonsense to the physics groups so he can watch the >> serious posters foam at the mouth. Although neither crazy nor stupid, >> he does have a pretty weird sense of humor. >> > > **I can only judge a person by their words and deeds. Judged by his > words, benj is a moron. I don't know how you can claim that he is > anything else, unless you know him, or have enjoyed a private > communication with him. > High praise from someone from Oz. It's like a gorilla saying, "I don't understand humans. They are morons." Hint: Trevor, Sergio actually possesses science knowledge and ability, something which it is impossible for a journalist-propagandist such as yourself to judge. Trust the opinion of others who are likewise knowledgeable. That's the best a strategic writer like you can hope for. I tell you SErgio "knows sumptin"!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 14:05 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <fj0757F2f0iU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #680407 |
On 9/04/2018 1:56 PM, benj wrote: > On 4/8/2018 9:40 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 9/04/2018 11:12 AM, Lofty Goat wrote: >>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:57:03 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> >>>> 'benj' claims to have many science degrees and yet, manages to come >>>> out with the insane statement referenced above. >>> >>> Ben is, as I recall, a retired engineer. One of his favorite indoor >>> sports is posting nonsense to the physics groups so he can watch the >>> serious posters foam at the mouth. Although neither crazy nor stupid, >>> he does have a pretty weird sense of humor. >>> >> >> **I can only judge a person by their words and deeds. Judged by his >> words, benj is a moron. I don't know how you can claim that he is >> anything else, unless you know him, or have enjoyed a private >> communication with him. >> > High praise from someone from Oz. It's like a gorilla saying, "I don't > understand humans. They are morons." > > Hint: Trevor, Sergio actually possesses science knowledge and ability, **I am sure Sergio does. YOU, OTOH, do not. You are a scientific ignoramus. Sergio's qualifications are not at issue. Yours are. > something which it is impossible for a journalist-propagandist such as > yourself to judge. Trust the opinion of others who are likewise > knowledgeable. That's the best a strategic writer like you can hope for. > > I tell you SErgio "knows sumptin"! **I'm sure he does. You are the moron here, not Sergio. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 11:27 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <kDLyC.19937$K%2.6181@fx38.iad> |
| In reply to | #680410 |
On 4/9/2018 12:05 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 9/04/2018 1:56 PM, benj wrote: >> On 4/8/2018 9:40 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 9/04/2018 11:12 AM, Lofty Goat wrote: >>>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:57:03 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> >>>>> 'benj' claims to have many science degrees and yet, manages to come >>>>> out with the insane statement referenced above. >>>> >>>> Ben is, as I recall, a retired engineer. One of his favorite indoor >>>> sports is posting nonsense to the physics groups so he can watch the >>>> serious posters foam at the mouth. Although neither crazy nor stupid, >>>> he does have a pretty weird sense of humor. >>>> >>> >>> **I can only judge a person by their words and deeds. Judged by his >>> words, benj is a moron. I don't know how you can claim that he is >>> anything else, unless you know him, or have enjoyed a private >>> communication with him. >>> >> High praise from someone from Oz. It's like a gorilla saying, "I don't >> understand humans. They are morons." >> >> Hint: Trevor, Sergio actually possesses science knowledge and ability, > > **I am sure Sergio does. YOU, OTOH, do not. You are a scientific > ignoramus. Sergio's qualifications are not at issue. Yours are. > > >> something which it is impossible for a journalist-propagandist such as >> yourself to judge. Trust the opinion of others who are likewise >> knowledgeable. That's the best a strategic writer like you can hope for. >> >> I tell you SErgio "knows sumptin"! > > **I'm sure he does. You are the moron here, not Sergio. > > Nope. You are the dishonest moron here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-10 07:36 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <fj24niFg6atU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #680439 |
On 10/04/2018 1:27 AM, benj wrote: > On 4/9/2018 12:05 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 9/04/2018 1:56 PM, benj wrote: >>> On 4/8/2018 9:40 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 9/04/2018 11:12 AM, Lofty Goat wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:57:03 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 'benj' claims to have many science degrees and yet, manages to come >>>>>> out with the insane statement referenced above. >>>>> >>>>> Ben is, as I recall, a retired engineer. One of his favorite indoor >>>>> sports is posting nonsense to the physics groups so he can watch the >>>>> serious posters foam at the mouth. Although neither crazy nor stupid, >>>>> he does have a pretty weird sense of humor. >>>>> >>>> >>>> **I can only judge a person by their words and deeds. Judged by his >>>> words, benj is a moron. I don't know how you can claim that he is >>>> anything else, unless you know him, or have enjoyed a private >>>> communication with him. >>>> >>> High praise from someone from Oz. It's like a gorilla saying, "I >>> don't understand humans. They are morons." >>> >>> Hint: Trevor, Sergio actually possesses science knowledge and ability, >> >> **I am sure Sergio does. YOU, OTOH, do not. You are a scientific >> ignoramus. Sergio's qualifications are not at issue. Yours are. >> >> >>> something which it is impossible for a journalist-propagandist such >>> as yourself to judge. Trust the opinion of others who are likewise >>> knowledgeable. That's the best a strategic writer like you can hope for. >>> >>> I tell you SErgio "knows sumptin"! >> >> **I'm sure he does. You are the moron here, not Sergio. >> >> > Nope. You are the dishonest moron here. **What? Because I pose questions you can't answer? -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 17:01 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <pagnrl$1si2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #680514 |
On 4/9/2018 4:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 10/04/2018 1:27 AM, benj wrote: >> On 4/9/2018 12:05 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 9/04/2018 1:56 PM, benj wrote: >>>> On 4/8/2018 9:40 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 9/04/2018 11:12 AM, Lofty Goat wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:57:03 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> 'benj' claims to have many science degrees and yet, manages to come >>>>>>> out with the insane statement referenced above. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ben is, as I recall, a retired engineer. One of his favorite indoor >>>>>> sports is posting nonsense to the physics groups so he can watch the >>>>>> serious posters foam at the mouth. Although neither crazy nor >>>>>> stupid, >>>>>> he does have a pretty weird sense of humor. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> **I can only judge a person by their words and deeds. Judged by his >>>>> words, benj is a moron. I don't know how you can claim that he is >>>>> anything else, unless you know him, or have enjoyed a private >>>>> communication with him. >>>>> >>>> High praise from someone from Oz. It's like a gorilla saying, "I >>>> don't understand humans. They are morons." >>>> >>>> Hint: Trevor, Sergio actually possesses science knowledge and ability, >>> >>> **I am sure Sergio does. YOU, OTOH, do not. You are a scientific >>> ignoramus. Sergio's qualifications are not at issue. Yours are. >>> >>> >>>> something which it is impossible for a journalist-propagandist such >>>> as yourself to judge. Trust the opinion of others who are likewise >>>> knowledgeable. That's the best a strategic writer like you can hope >>>> for. >>>> >>>> I tell you SErgio "knows sumptin"! >>> >>> **I'm sure he does. You are the moron here, not Sergio. >>> >>> >> Nope. You are the dishonest moron here. > > **What? Because I pose questions you can't answer? > you just asked 2 more questions, why so many questions? does smoking cause cancer? 99% of non-smoking climate doctors say yes. 93% of medical Doctors say yes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-10 08:14 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <fj26tbFgjv3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #680518 |
On 10/04/2018 8:01 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 4/9/2018 4:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 10/04/2018 1:27 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 4/9/2018 12:05 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 9/04/2018 1:56 PM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 4/8/2018 9:40 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 9/04/2018 11:12 AM, Lofty Goat wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:57:03 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 'benj' claims to have many science degrees and yet, manages to come >>>>>>>> out with the insane statement referenced above. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ben is, as I recall, a retired engineer. One of his favorite indoor >>>>>>> sports is posting nonsense to the physics groups so he can watch the >>>>>>> serious posters foam at the mouth. Although neither crazy nor >>>>>>> stupid, >>>>>>> he does have a pretty weird sense of humor. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> **I can only judge a person by their words and deeds. Judged by his >>>>>> words, benj is a moron. I don't know how you can claim that he is >>>>>> anything else, unless you know him, or have enjoyed a private >>>>>> communication with him. >>>>>> >>>>> High praise from someone from Oz. It's like a gorilla saying, "I >>>>> don't understand humans. They are morons." >>>>> >>>>> Hint: Trevor, Sergio actually possesses science knowledge and ability, >>>> >>>> **I am sure Sergio does. YOU, OTOH, do not. You are a scientific >>>> ignoramus. Sergio's qualifications are not at issue. Yours are. >>>> >>>> >>>>> something which it is impossible for a journalist-propagandist such >>>>> as yourself to judge. Trust the opinion of others who are likewise >>>>> knowledgeable. That's the best a strategic writer like you can hope >>>>> for. >>>>> >>>>> I tell you SErgio "knows sumptin"! >>>> >>>> **I'm sure he does. You are the moron here, not Sergio. >>>> >>>> >>> Nope. You are the dishonest moron here. >> >> **What? Because I pose questions you can't answer? >> > > you just asked 2 more questions, why so many questions? **Because benj makes many, many unsupported claims that require answers. > > does smoking cause cancer? **Smoking leads to an increased likelihood of contracting cancer or some other smoking related illness. 99% of non-smoking climate doctors say yes. **Do they? Cite your source for that statistic. > 93% of medical Doctors say yes. **Do they? That would be very sloppy language, if they did say that. Please cite your source for that statistic. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 21:09 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <s84ocdhkg9nt9km65pgtm3blbjcjt3im1g@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #680518 |
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 17:01:25 -0500, Sergio wrote: > you just asked 2 more questions, why so many questions? From a friend who is a lawyer: (Yes, I know, one must hold two contradictory concepts in mind to understand that phrase.) "You're a lawyer? How much do you charge to answer questions?" "Yes, $1,000 for three questions. What's your third question?" -- Goat
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-10 08:34 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <paieh0$mlm$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #680553 |
On 4/9/2018 9:09 PM, Lofty Goat wrote: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 17:01:25 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> you just asked 2 more questions, why so many questions? > > From a friend who is a lawyer: > > (Yes, I know, one must hold two contradictory concepts in mind to > understand that phrase.) > > "You're a lawyer? How much do you charge to answer questions?" > > "Yes, $1,000 for three questions. What's your third question?" > oh! and so true...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-10 04:51 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <lW_yC.43399$6_2.15534@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #680518 |
On 4/9/2018 6:01 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 4/9/2018 4:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 10/04/2018 1:27 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 4/9/2018 12:05 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 9/04/2018 1:56 PM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 4/8/2018 9:40 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 9/04/2018 11:12 AM, Lofty Goat wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:57:03 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 'benj' claims to have many science degrees and yet, manages to come >>>>>>>> out with the insane statement referenced above. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ben is, as I recall, a retired engineer. One of his favorite indoor >>>>>>> sports is posting nonsense to the physics groups so he can watch the >>>>>>> serious posters foam at the mouth. Although neither crazy nor >>>>>>> stupid, >>>>>>> he does have a pretty weird sense of humor. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> **I can only judge a person by their words and deeds. Judged by his >>>>>> words, benj is a moron. I don't know how you can claim that he is >>>>>> anything else, unless you know him, or have enjoyed a private >>>>>> communication with him. >>>>>> >>>>> High praise from someone from Oz. It's like a gorilla saying, "I >>>>> don't understand humans. They are morons." >>>>> >>>>> Hint: Trevor, Sergio actually possesses science knowledge and ability, >>>> >>>> **I am sure Sergio does. YOU, OTOH, do not. You are a scientific >>>> ignoramus. Sergio's qualifications are not at issue. Yours are. >>>> >>>> >>>>> something which it is impossible for a journalist-propagandist such >>>>> as yourself to judge. Trust the opinion of others who are likewise >>>>> knowledgeable. That's the best a strategic writer like you can hope >>>>> for. >>>>> >>>>> I tell you SErgio "knows sumptin"! >>>> >>>> **I'm sure he does. You are the moron here, not Sergio. >>>> >>>> >>> Nope. You are the dishonest moron here. >> >> **What? Because I pose questions you can't answer? >> > > you just asked 2 more questions, why so many questions? > > does smoking cause cancer? 99% of non-smoking climate doctors say yes. > 93% of medical Doctors say yes. > Sergio, propagandist Trevor asks so many questions because he then doesn't have to provide any answers that he is incapable of providing. It is Propaganda 101 to keep asking and demanding as if YOU were in charge to keep the opposition off balance. When it comes to lies and propaganda make no mistake, Trevor is a pro. As for Smoking and cancer, sucking combustion products may not be healthful, but last I heard the actual thing that "causes" cancer is not in general known. There are things that are known to be some kind of factors but to say any one of them are the "cause" of cancer is just unscientific journalist blather. It doesn't matter if 99% of doctors call it "settled science". Science is not done by taking a poll and going with the majority vote. If that were true then global warming "climate change" would actually be science.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 11:52 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <pag5ot$sg3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #680396 |
On 4/8/2018 8:40 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 9/04/2018 11:12 AM, Lofty Goat wrote: >> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:57:03 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> >>> 'benj' claims to have many science degrees and yet, manages to come >>> out with the insane statement referenced above. >> >> Ben is, as I recall, a retired engineer. One of his favorite indoor >> sports is posting nonsense to the physics groups so he can watch the >> serious posters foam at the mouth. Although neither crazy nor stupid, >> he does have a pretty weird sense of humor. >> > > **I can only judge a person You go around judging people on the internet by what they post on USENET ?? You a either a moron, or shallow thinker (you choose). > by their words and deeds. Judged by his > words, benj is a moron. but Trevor, you already judged yourself as the supremiest person, who holds superior wisdom over all others. benj openly questions the validity of scientific conclusions by contract journalists who have little to no credentials. Like almost all links kensi posts, and most of yours. you kesni pupa, Nads all respond with twists and turns and change the subject, correct engrlish, without being able to understand the orgional data sets, the math needed, nor the specific computer models, analysis of error sources, and so on. lets face it, you three Trevor, Nads, kensi pupa are "lite weights." Go play badminton game on your play station. > I don't know how you can claim that he is > anything else, unless you know him, or have enjoyed a private > communication with him. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 17:22 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <HQQyC.42524$zO1.29357@fx34.iad> |
| In reply to | #680461 |
On 4/9/2018 12:52 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 4/8/2018 8:40 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 9/04/2018 11:12 AM, Lofty Goat wrote: >>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:57:03 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> >>>> 'benj' claims to have many science degrees and yet, manages to come >>>> out with the insane statement referenced above. >>> >>> Ben is, as I recall, a retired engineer. One of his favorite indoor >>> sports is posting nonsense to the physics groups so he can watch the >>> serious posters foam at the mouth. Although neither crazy nor stupid, >>> he does have a pretty weird sense of humor. >>> >> >> **I can only judge a person > > You go around judging people on the internet by what they post on USENET > ?? You a either a moron, or shallow thinker (you choose). > > >> by their words and deeds. Judged by his >> words, benj is a moron. > > but Trevor, you already judged yourself as the supremiest person, who > holds superior wisdom over all others. > > benj openly questions the validity of scientific conclusions by contract > journalists who have little to no credentials. Like almost all links > kensi posts, and most of yours. > > you kesni pupa, Nads all respond with twists and turns and change the > subject, correct engrlish, without being able to understand the orgional > data sets, the math needed, nor the specific computer models, analysis > of error sources, and so on. > > lets face it, you three Trevor, Nads, kensi pupa are "lite weights." Go > play badminton game on your play station. Sergio cuts through the crap to the "real" Trevor, Nads and "kensi". SLAM DUNK!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-10 07:36 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <fj24m7Fg6atU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #680461 |
On 10/04/2018 2:52 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 4/8/2018 8:40 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 9/04/2018 11:12 AM, Lofty Goat wrote: >>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:57:03 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> >>>> 'benj' claims to have many science degrees and yet, manages to come >>>> out with the insane statement referenced above. >>> >>> Ben is, as I recall, a retired engineer. One of his favorite indoor >>> sports is posting nonsense to the physics groups so he can watch the >>> serious posters foam at the mouth. Although neither crazy nor stupid, >>> he does have a pretty weird sense of humor. >>> >> >> **I can only judge a person > > You go around judging people on the internet by what they post on USENET > ?? You a either a moron, or shallow thinker (you choose). > > >> by their words and deeds. Judged by his >> words, benj is a moron. > > but Trevor, you already judged yourself as the supremiest person, who > holds superior wisdom over all others. **Did I? Got a cite for that? I'll wait while you find it. > > benj openly questions the validity of scientific conclusions by contract > journalists who have little to no credentials. Like almost all links > kensi posts, and most of yours. **Nope. benj is a moron, who wouldn't know real science from Breitbart. Worse, benj scurries away from discussions that exceed his ability to comprehend. > > you kesni pupa, Nads all respond with twists and turns and change the > subject, correct engrlish, without being able to understand the orgional > data sets, the math needed, nor the specific computer models, analysis > of error sources, and so on. **Says the person who cites right wing news sites and Anthony Watts instead of real science. This would be a pot, kettle, black moment. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 17:13 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <pagoi9$1tr5$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #680513 |
On 4/9/2018 4:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 10/04/2018 2:52 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 4/8/2018 8:40 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 9/04/2018 11:12 AM, Lofty Goat wrote: >>>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:57:03 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> >>>>> 'benj' claims to have many science degrees and yet, manages to come >>>>> out with the insane statement referenced above. >>>> >>>> Ben is, as I recall, a retired engineer. One of his favorite indoor >>>> sports is posting nonsense to the physics groups so he can watch the >>>> serious posters foam at the mouth. Although neither crazy nor stupid, >>>> he does have a pretty weird sense of humor. >>>> >>> >>> **I can only judge a person >> >> You go around judging people on the internet by what they post on USENET >> ?? You a either a moron, or shallow thinker (you choose). >> >> >>> by their words and deeds. Judged by his >>> words, benj is a moron. >> >> but Trevor, you already judged yourself as the supremiest person, who >> holds superior wisdom over all others. > > **Did I? Got a cite for that? I'll wait while you find it. you have a website dedicated to yourself. > >> >> benj openly questions the validity of scientific conclusions by contract >> journalists who have little to no credentials. Like almost all links >> kensi posts, and most of yours. > > **Nope. benj is a moron, who wouldn't know real science from Breitbart. > Worse, benj scurries away from discussions that exceed his ability to > comprehend. > I am fining you 15 cents for using "scurries" as that word is too old. scurries ? First recorded in 1800-10; extracted from hurry-scurry. do you read Scientific American for your Science ? (shameful) >> >> you kesni pupa, Nads all respond with twists and turns and change the >> subject, correct engrlish, without being able to understand the orgional >> data sets, the math needed, nor the specific computer models, analysis >> of error sources, and so on. > > **Says the person who cites right wing news sites and Anthony Watts > instead of real science. This would be a pot, kettle, black moment. you prefer CNN ? MSNBC ? RT ? FB ? Google Non-Fake News ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-10 08:23 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <fj27esFgotdU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #680521 |
On 10/04/2018 8:13 AM, Sergio wrote:
> On 4/9/2018 4:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 10/04/2018 2:52 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>> On 4/8/2018 8:40 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 9/04/2018 11:12 AM, Lofty Goat wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:57:03 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 'benj' claims to have many science degrees and yet, manages to come
>>>>>> out with the insane statement referenced above.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ben is, as I recall, a retired engineer. One of his favorite indoor
>>>>> sports is posting nonsense to the physics groups so he can watch the
>>>>> serious posters foam at the mouth. Although neither crazy nor stupid,
>>>>> he does have a pretty weird sense of humor.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> **I can only judge a person
>>>
>>> You go around judging people on the internet by what they post on USENET
>>> ?? You a either a moron, or shallow thinker (you choose).
>>>
>>>
>>>> by their words and deeds. Judged by his
>>>> words, benj is a moron.
>>>
>>> but Trevor, you already judged yourself as the supremiest person, who
>>> holds superior wisdom over all others.
>>
>> **Did I? Got a cite for that? I'll wait while you find it.
>
> you have a website dedicated to yourself.
>
>>
>>>
>>> benj openly questions the validity of scientific conclusions by contract
>>> journalists who have little to no credentials. Like almost all links
>>> kensi posts, and most of yours.
>>
>> **Nope. benj is a moron, who wouldn't know real science from Breitbart.
>> Worse, benj scurries away from discussions that exceed his ability to
>> comprehend.
>>
>
> I am fining you 15 cents for using "scurries" as that word is too old.
> scurries ? First recorded in 1800-10; extracted from hurry-scurry.
>
> do you read Scientific American for your Science ? (shameful)
**Along with Nature, Science and other sources, yes. You need to acquire
your scientific information from sources other than Breitbart and Newsweek.
>
>
>>>
>>> you kesni pupa, Nads all respond with twists and turns and change the
>>> subject, correct engrlish, without being able to understand the orgional
>>> data sets, the math needed, nor the specific computer models, analysis
>>> of error sources, and so on.
>>
>> **Says the person who cites right wing news sites and Anthony Watts
>> instead of real science. This would be a pot, kettle, black moment.
>
> you prefer CNN ?
**Nope. Don't watch/read it.
MSNBC ?
**Nope. Don't watch/read it.
RT ?
**Dunno what that is.
FB ?
**Dunno what that is.
Google Non-Fake News ?
**No need.
Again, you need to read other sources other than Breitbart, Fox and
Newsweek. Nature and Science would be excellent places to start.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 19:43 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Does smoking cause cancer? |
| Message-ID | <pah1bo$apg$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #680525 |
On 4/9/2018 5:23 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 10/04/2018 8:13 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 4/9/2018 4:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 10/04/2018 2:52 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 4/8/2018 8:40 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 9/04/2018 11:12 AM, Lofty Goat wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:57:03 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> 'benj' claims to have many science degrees and yet, manages to come >>>>>>> out with the insane statement referenced above. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ben is, as I recall, a retired engineer. One of his favorite indoor >>>>>> sports is posting nonsense to the physics groups so he can watch the >>>>>> serious posters foam at the mouth. Although neither crazy nor >>>>>> stupid, >>>>>> he does have a pretty weird sense of humor. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> **I can only judge a person >>>> >>>> You go around judging people on the internet by what they post on >>>> USENET >>>> ?? You a either a moron, or shallow thinker (you choose). >>>> >>>> >>>>> by their words and deeds. Judged by his >>>>> words, benj is a moron. >>>> >>>> but Trevor, you already judged yourself as the supremiest person, who >>>> holds superior wisdom over all others. >>> >>> **Did I? Got a cite for that? I'll wait while you find it. >> >> you have a website dedicated to yourself. >> >>> >>>> >>>> benj openly questions the validity of scientific conclusions by >>>> contract >>>> journalists who have little to no credentials. Like almost all links >>>> kensi posts, and most of yours. >>> >>> **Nope. benj is a moron, who wouldn't know real science from Breitbart. >>> Worse, benj scurries away from discussions that exceed his ability to >>> comprehend. >>> >> >> I am fining you 15 cents for using "scurries" as that word is too old. >> scurries ? First recorded in 1800-10; extracted from hurry-scurry. >> >> do you read Scientific American for your Science ? (shameful) > > **Along with Nature, Science and other sources, yes. You need to acquire > your scientific information from sources other than Breitbart and Newsweek. > >> >> >>>> >>>> you kesni pupa, Nads all respond with twists and turns and change the >>>> subject, correct engrlish, without being able to understand the >>>> orgional >>>> data sets, the math needed, nor the specific computer models, analysis >>>> of error sources, and so on. >>> >>> **Says the person who cites right wing news sites and Anthony Watts >>> instead of real science. This would be a pot, kettle, black moment. >> >> you prefer CNN ? > > **Nope. Don't watch/read it. > > > MSNBC ? > > **Nope. Don't watch/read it. > > > RT ? > > **Dunno what that is. https://www.rt.com/ they have a different view than mainstream media, and very good, just skip over the obvious propaganda > > > FB ? > > **Dunno what that is. facebook -- as they were going to screen out fake news, but that is impossable for anybody to do. Advertizing is about 80% fake news. > > > Google Non-Fake News ? > > > **No need. > > Again, you need to read other sources other than Breitbart, Fox and > Newsweek. > no, I dont read any of those, propaganda, dont read Time mag. nor except for >Nature and Science would be excellent places to start. they Nature and Science both have been partly politicized, so you have to screen out their stuff too, but they are ok. Scientific American is politicized, infested with contract Journalist who know little of what they report on, they finish an article and sell it to SA. I go to the University library (they have 23 on campus) and read the professional journals, and new book section once a month. most of the on line stuff is substandard, as someone has munched around. Physics.org is a muncher. ANYHOW, there was a good clip on TV tonight, PBS/npr about Zuckerberg and Cambridge Analytics, and they had some slides from a CA presentation that use FB data and came out with 5 (?) voter "personality" types, and that is strongly reflected in this newsgroup. (they make people pay for that info, so it may not be public on the internet. so many of the fights in here, fit right in with CA's analysis, FB and CA, What Trump used, what Obama used, and *our politicians* are still using it now. try downloading your FB file on companies they shared your info with, and see if their any politicians...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web