Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #644012 > unrolled thread

Planetary Protection Officer

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2017-08-02 09:29 -0700
Last post2017-08-05 18:23 -0700
Articles 17 on this page of 57 — 10 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Planetary Protection Officer  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-02 09:29 -0700
    Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-02 09:34 -0700
      Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-02 09:47 -0700
        Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-02 10:10 -0700
        Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-02 15:54 -0700
          Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-03 10:03 -0700
            Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-03 10:53 -0700
            Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-03 11:06 -0700
              Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-03 11:11 -0700
              Re: Planetary Protection Officer "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-08-03 20:50 -0400
                Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-03 20:50 -0700
                  Re: Planetary Protection Officer "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-08-04 09:36 -0400
                    Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-04 23:21 -0700
                      Re: Planetary Protection Officer "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-08-05 04:37 -0400
                      Re: Planetary Protection Officer Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-08-05 13:57 -0700
                        Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-05 14:48 -0700
                          Re: Planetary Protection Officer Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-08-05 15:14 -0700
                            Re: Planetary Protection Officer MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-05 20:09 -0500
                            Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-05 18:13 -0700
              Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-05 10:16 -0700
      Re: Planetary Protection Officer Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-04 14:00 +1000
        Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-04 00:07 -0700
          Re: Planetary Protection Officer Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-04 17:14 +1000
            Re: Planetary Protection Officer Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-04 11:35 -0500
              Re: Planetary Protection Officer Otten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op> - 2017-08-04 17:12 +0000
                Re: Planetary Protection Officer Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-04 12:51 -0500
                  Re: Planetary Protection Officer Otten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op> - 2017-08-04 18:39 +0000
                    Re: Planetary Protection Officer MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-04 18:41 -0500
                      Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-04 23:18 -0700
                      Re: Planetary Protection Officer Otten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op> - 2017-08-05 10:09 +0000
                        Re: Planetary Protection Officer MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-05 09:08 -0500
                          Re: Planetary Protection Officer Otten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op> - 2017-08-05 14:19 +0000
                            Re: Planetary Protection Officer MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-05 10:46 -0500
                              Re: Planetary Protection Officer Otten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op> - 2017-08-05 15:51 +0000
                              Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-05 09:41 -0700
                              Re: Planetary Protection Officer Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-06 10:49 +0200
              Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-04 23:23 -0700
              Re: Planetary Protection Officer Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-05 16:26 +1000
                Re: Planetary Protection Officer MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-05 10:55 -0500
                  Re: Planetary Protection Officer Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-06 10:58 +0200
                Re: Planetary Protection Officer benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-05 21:16 -0400
                  Re: Planetary Protection Officer Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-06 15:05 +1000
            Re: Planetary Protection Officer Otten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op> - 2017-08-04 17:36 +0000
              Re: Planetary Protection Officer Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-05 16:22 +1000
                Re: Planetary Protection Officer Otten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op> - 2017-08-05 11:37 +0000
                  Re: Planetary Protection Officer Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-05 21:56 +1000
                    Re: Planetary Protection Officer MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-05 09:11 -0500
                      Re: Planetary Protection Officer Otten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op> - 2017-08-05 15:16 +0000
                        Re: Planetary Protection Officer MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-05 11:05 -0500
                      Re: Planetary Protection Officer Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-06 10:53 +0200
                        Re: Planetary Protection Officer Ustine Bertrand <ufu@ywwerw.su> - 2017-08-06 09:33 +0000
                          Re: Planetary Protection Officer Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-06 13:38 +0200
                    Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-05 10:04 -0700
            Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-04 23:15 -0700
              Re: Planetary Protection Officer Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-05 16:30 +1000
    Nine year old kid applies for Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-05 13:28 -0700
      Re: Nine year old kid applies for Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-05 18:23 -0700

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]


#644695

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2017-08-05 21:16 -0400
Message-ID<59866dfb$0$43811$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#644487
On 8/5/2017 2:26 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 5/08/2017 2:35 AM, Serg io wrote:
>> On 8/4/2017 2:14 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>> On 4/08/2017 5:07 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/08/2017 2:34 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/474414000
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nasa Is Hiring a Planetary Protection Officer to Save Earth from 
>>>>>> Aliens
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>> http://www.newsweek.com/nasa-hiring-planetary-protection-officer-save-earth-aliens-645254 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like neither you, nor Newsweek, are capable of reading a clear
>>>>> description of what the job is actually about.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The job description title is clear..
>>>>
>>>> "Planetary Protection Officer"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The question is..."Protection" from What????
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can you answer that Mrs. Else?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The responsibility is to protect the planets and moons of the Solar 
>>> System from microbiological contamination by NASA's space probes.
>>
>> impossable to do that if it lands on it.  all things manufactured 
>> already have microbio contamination on them, as soon as exposed to air.
>>
>> the only way is lots of hard radiation
> 
> Well, for example, Galileo was deliberately crashed into Jupiter to 
> avoid any possibility of its contaminating Europa after it can no longer 
> control its orbit.
> 
> Ensuring that any future landing on Europa won't risk contamination will 
> likely be one of the responsibilities of the appointee.
> 
> Sylvia.

So crashing contamination into Jupiter is is fine in order to save the 
purity of Europa? I'm sure glad we have a bunch of ethical scientists to 
keep the universe uncontaminated by humans. Kind of reminds me of the 
old "had to destroy the village to save it".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#644737

FromSylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Date2017-08-06 15:05 +1000
Message-ID<eunmd2FcdgjU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#644695
On 6/08/2017 11:16 AM, benj wrote:
> On 8/5/2017 2:26 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 5/08/2017 2:35 AM, Serg io wrote:
>>> On 8/4/2017 2:14 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>> On 4/08/2017 5:07 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/08/2017 2:34 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/474414000
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nasa Is Hiring a Planetary Protection Officer to Save Earth from 
>>>>>>> Aliens
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.newsweek.com/nasa-hiring-planetary-protection-officer-save-earth-aliens-645254 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like neither you, nor Newsweek, are capable of reading a clear
>>>>>> description of what the job is actually about.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The job description title is clear..
>>>>>
>>>>> "Planetary Protection Officer"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The question is..."Protection" from What????
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you answer that Mrs. Else?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The responsibility is to protect the planets and moons of the Solar 
>>>> System from microbiological contamination by NASA's space probes.
>>>
>>> impossable to do that if it lands on it.  all things manufactured 
>>> already have microbio contamination on them, as soon as exposed to air.
>>>
>>> the only way is lots of hard radiation
>>
>> Well, for example, Galileo was deliberately crashed into Jupiter to 
>> avoid any possibility of its contaminating Europa after it can no 
>> longer control its orbit.
>>
>> Ensuring that any future landing on Europa won't risk contamination 
>> will likely be one of the responsibilities of the appointee.
>>
>> Sylvia.
> 
> So crashing contamination into Jupiter is is fine in order to save the 
> purity of Europa? I'm sure glad we have a bunch of ethical scientists to 
> keep the universe uncontaminated by humans. Kind of reminds me of the 
> old "had to destroy the village to save it".
> 
The heat of entry into Jupiter's atmosphere would sterilize anything alive.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#644372

FromOtten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op>
Date2017-08-04 17:36 +0000
Message-ID<om2ba5$cia$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#644333
Sylvia Else wrote:

> The responsibility is to protect the planets and moons of the Solar
> System from microbiological contamination by NASA's space probes.

Excellent point. No wonder Modern Science big Pharma declared war to 
microbiological life, here on Earth likewise. The stupidest thing to do, 
from a human perspective, is to declare war to life. How stupid they can 
be.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#644485

FromSylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Date2017-08-05 16:22 +1000
Message-ID<eul6gvFphjiU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#644372
On 5/08/2017 3:36 AM, Otten Schneijders wrote:
> Sylvia Else wrote:
> 
>> The responsibility is to protect the planets and moons of the Solar
>> System from microbiological contamination by NASA's space probes.
> 
> Excellent point. No wonder Modern Science big Pharma declared war to
> microbiological life, here on Earth likewise. The stupidest thing to do,
> from a human perspective, is to declare war to life. How stupid they can
> be.
> 

I'm not sure what you're saying there. One of the big questions about 
life is how likely it is to arise. At the moment, all we know is that it 
arose at least once. It might happen easily, or Earth might be the only 
place in the entire universe where it's happened. We have no evidence to 
support one possibility or the other. Finding life on Europa that is 
fundamentally different from life on Earth would indicate that the 
probability of life evolving is quite high.

Consequently, the last thing we want to do is to contaminate Europa with 
Earth life potentially destroying forever our chance to find non-Earth 
life on Europa.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#644505

FromOtten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op>
Date2017-08-05 11:37 +0000
Message-ID<om4amc$rgj$4@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#644485
Sylvia Else wrote:

> Consequently, the last thing we want to do is to contaminate Europa with
> Earth life potentially destroying forever our chance to find non-Earth
> life on Europa. Sylvia.

mam, you are spewing out nothing but arrogance. No intellect. Like a 
televangelist, we we, I I I we. There is nothing there, but I and we.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#644509

FromSylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Date2017-08-05 21:56 +1000
Message-ID<eulq2rFttv4U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#644505
On 5/08/2017 9:37 PM, Otten Schneijders wrote:
> Sylvia Else wrote:
> 
>> Consequently, the last thing we want to do is to contaminate Europa with
>> Earth life potentially destroying forever our chance to find non-Earth
>> life on Europa. Sylvia.
> 
> mam, you are spewing out nothing but arrogance. No intellect. Like a
> televangelist, we we, I I I we. There is nothing there, but I and we.
> 

That's your argument?

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#644536

FromMaryK <nobody@invalid.com>
Date2017-08-05 09:11 -0500
Message-ID<om4jom$1grs$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#644509
On 8/5/2017 6:56 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 5/08/2017 9:37 PM, Otten Schneijders wrote:
>> Sylvia Else wrote:
>>
>>> Consequently, the last thing we want to do is to contaminate Europa with
>>> Earth life potentially destroying forever our chance to find non-Earth
>>> life on Europa. Sylvia.
>>
>> mam, you are spewing out nothing but arrogance. No intellect. Like a
>> televangelist, we we, I I I we. There is nothing there, but I and we.
>>
> 
> That's your argument?
> 
> Sylvia.

I think this guy is rare chinese troll comes around sometimes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#644545

FromOtten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op>
Date2017-08-05 15:16 +0000
Message-ID<om4ngf$1f7v$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#644536
MaryK wrote:

> On 8/5/2017 6:56 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 5/08/2017 9:37 PM, Otten Schneijders wrote:
>>> Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>
>>>> Consequently, the last thing we want to do is to contaminate Europa
>>>> with Earth life potentially destroying forever our chance to find
>>>> non-Earth life on Europa. Sylvia.
>>>
>>> mam, you are spewing out nothing but arrogance. No intellect. Like a
>>> televangelist, we we, I I I we. There is nothing there, but I and we.
>>
>> That's your argument? Sylvia.
> 
> I think this guy is rare chinese troll comes around sometimes.

You think? This is a joke, right? You don't even know what life is and HAS 
TO BE in Modern Science. You are insignificant in a Relativity forum. Piss 
off, lady!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#644561

FromMaryK <nobody@invalid.com>
Date2017-08-05 11:05 -0500
Message-ID<om4qd6$1q4c$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#644545
On 8/5/2017 10:16 AM, Otten Schneijders wrote:
> MaryK wrote:
> 
>> On 8/5/2017 6:56 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>> On 5/08/2017 9:37 PM, Otten Schneijders wrote:
>>>> Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Consequently, the last thing we want to do is to contaminate Europa
>>>>> with Earth life potentially destroying forever our chance to find
>>>>> non-Earth life on Europa. Sylvia.
>>>>
>>>> mam, you are spewing out nothing but arrogance. No intellect. Like a
>>>> televangelist, we we, I I I we. There is nothing there, but I and we.
>>>
>>> That's your argument? Sylvia.
>>
>> I think this guy is rare chinese troll comes around sometimes.
> 
> You think? This is a joke, right? You don't even know what life is and HAS
> TO BE in Modern Science. You are insignificant in a Relativity forum. Piss
> off, lady!
> 

[do china dudes say "piss off" ?,  are you brittish geezer?]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#644765

FromThomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Date2017-08-06 10:53 +0200
Message-ID<1884976.OBFZWjSADL@PointedEars.de>
In reply to#644536
MaryK wrote:

> On 8/5/2017 6:56 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 5/08/2017 9:37 PM, Otten Schneijders wrote:
>>> Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>> Consequently, the last thing we want to do is to contaminate Europa
>>>> with Earth life potentially destroying forever our chance to find
>>>> non-Earth life on Europa. Sylvia.
>>> mam, you are spewing out nothing but arrogance. No intellect. Like a
>>> televangelist, we we, I I I we. There is nothing there, but I and we.
>> That's your argument?
> 
> I think this guy is rare chinese troll comes around sometimes.

Whether they are Chinese I could not care less, but it is the ’nym-shifting 
“Tensor” troll who is unfortunately is posting here all the time.  And by 
“here” I mean both of the newsgroups in which both of you continued their 
mindbogglingly stupid crosspost, sci.physics and sci.physics.relativity.

F’up2 sci.physics

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#644771

FromUstine Bertrand <ufu@ywwerw.su>
Date2017-08-06 09:33 +0000
Message-ID<om6nod$12t1$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#644765
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

> MaryK wrote:
>> I think this guy is rare chinese troll comes around sometimes.
> 
> Whether they are Chinese I could not care less, but it is the
> ’nym-shifting “Tensor” troll who is unfortunately is posting here all
> the

Tensors must be something you don't know, you stupid kraut. And seemingly
YOU, a not even half-engineer, are the one posting stupidities fooling
around inhere.

And a liar that you are, pretending both knowing, ignoring and plonking
those randomly nice people. A clear nonsense and a impossibility.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#644781

FromThomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Date2017-08-06 13:38 +0200
Message-ID<13299673.tv2OnDr8pf@PointedEars.de>
In reply to#644771
The ’nym-shifting troll wrote as "Ustine Bertrand" <ufu@ywwerw.su>:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> MaryK wrote:
>>> I think this guy is rare chinese troll comes around sometimes.
>> 
>> Whether they are Chinese I could not care less, but it is the
>> ’nym-shifting “Tensor” troll who is unfortunately is posting here all
>> the
> 
> Tensors must be something you don't know, you stupid kraut. […]

Q.E.D.

*PLONK*

(Unannounced F’up2 alt.morons ignored.  F’up2 set appropriately.)

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#644579

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2017-08-05 10:04 -0700
Message-ID<5985FAA4.3AD4@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#644509
Sylvia Else wrote:
> 
> On 5/08/2017 9:37 PM, Otten Schneijders wrote:
> > Sylvia Else wrote:
> >
> >> Consequently, the last thing we want to do is to contaminate Europa with
> >> Earth life potentially destroying forever our chance to find non-Earth
> >> life on Europa. Sylvia.
> >
> > mam, you are spewing out nothing but arrogance. No intellect. Like a
> > televangelist, we we, I I I we. There is nothing there, but I and we.
> >
> 
> That's your argument?
> 
> Sylvia.


There is nothing there, but I and we.


That is why "contamination" is impertive.


Why prevent asteroids from entering the earth, when it was us that arrived here by asteroids?


If the dinosaurs prevented the asteroids from entering the earth, would you be here today???


Maybe the new asteroids would bring a new type of scientist in this world, one that works for a living instead
of of yous that feel the government ought to subsides genuies.


If you sit around for ten years doing Nothing at a patent office, ...you just end up thinking about building an atomic bomb to all the kill people.


The next albert einstein bomb would be designed to kill all the stupid people.


There was a reason Why albert einstein fled from Germany...he was Number One on the list as the most dangerous person in
Germany. They were going to hang him! He got away and it proved they were right.

Read the letter Albert Einstein wrote and tell me what kind of person was he:


https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first



A mistake of Nature no doubt.


These mistakes have to be corrected..



Do not subsides genuies, ...let them fucking die.


It's the only protection we have.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#644482

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2017-08-04 23:15 -0700
Message-ID<59856288.1391@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#644333
Sylvia Else wrote:
> 
> On 4/08/2017 5:07 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Sylvia Else wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/08/2017 2:34 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/474414000
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Nasa Is Hiring a Planetary Protection Officer to Save Earth from Aliens
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> http://www.newsweek.com/nasa-hiring-planetary-protection-officer-save-earth-aliens-645254
> >>>
> >>
> >> Looks like neither you, nor Newsweek, are capable of reading a clear
> >> description of what the job is actually about.
> >>
> >> Sylvia.
> >
> >
> > The job description title is clear..
> >
> > "Planetary Protection Officer"
> >
> >
> > The question is..."Protection" from What????
> >
> >
> > Can you answer that Mrs. Else?
> >
> 
> The responsibility is to protect the planets and moons of the Solar
> System from microbiological contamination by NASA's space probes.

Oh, I get it...NASA gonna get in da protection racket..

NASA tells all the other planets "We're selling you Protection!"

Aliens:"Protection from who?"

NASA:"Protection from Us!"




> 
> Europa is of special concern because it is almost certainly a liquid
> water ocean covered by ice, and might conceivably be some kind of life
> there.
> 
> Sylvia.


you got that glaze look in your eyes...is any of your cats named
Jupiter?

Here pluto, pluto, pluto...


Me OW.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#644488

FromSylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Date2017-08-05 16:30 +1000
Message-ID<eul6vdFpjloU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#644482
On 5/08/2017 4:15 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Sylvia Else wrote:
>>
>> On 4/08/2017 5:07 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 3/08/2017 2:34 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/474414000
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nasa Is Hiring a Planetary Protection Officer to Save Earth from Aliens
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.newsweek.com/nasa-hiring-planetary-protection-officer-save-earth-aliens-645254
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Looks like neither you, nor Newsweek, are capable of reading a clear
>>>> description of what the job is actually about.
>>>>
>>>> Sylvia.
>>>
>>>
>>> The job description title is clear..
>>>
>>> "Planetary Protection Officer"
>>>
>>>
>>> The question is..."Protection" from What????
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you answer that Mrs. Else?
>>>
>>
>> The responsibility is to protect the planets and moons of the Solar
>> System from microbiological contamination by NASA's space probes.
> 
> Oh, I get it...NASA gonna get in da protection racket..
> 
> NASA tells all the other planets "We're selling you Protection!"
> 
> Aliens:"Protection from who?"
> 
> NASA:"Protection from Us!"

That's a rather silly comment, given the absence of anyone to sell to, 
let alone a meaningful way of transferring wealth between the planets 
even if the was someone.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#644616 — Nine year old kid applies for Planetary Protection Officer

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2017-08-05 13:28 -0700
SubjectNine year old kid applies for Planetary Protection Officer
Message-ID<59862A87.7907@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#644012
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/474414000

Dear NASA,

My name is Jack and I would like to apply for the planetary protection officer job.
I may be nine but....

Sincerely,
Guardian of the Galaxy


https://cnet4.cbsistatic.com/img/FEG_td4xorw55GsJe3HzL2Wqsjc=/2017/08/04/52cd69a7-d886-4a67-873a-b778c738b546/dgaljnwxcaa1qup.jpg
https://www.cnet.com/news/nasa-to-9-year-old-applicant-for-alien-protection-job-maybe/
http://video.foxnews.com/v/5532959673001/?#sp=show-clips

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#644699 — Re: Nine year old kid applies for Planetary Protection Officer

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2017-08-05 18:23 -0700
SubjectRe: Nine year old kid applies for Planetary Protection Officer
Message-ID<59866F7D.2D7@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#644616
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/474414000
> 
> Dear NASA,
> 
> My name is Jack and I would like to apply for the planetary protection officer job.
> I may be nine but....
> 
> Sincerely,
> Guardian of the Galaxy
> 
> https://cnet4.cbsistatic.com/img/FEG_td4xorw55GsJe3HzL2Wqsjc=/2017/08/04/52cd69a7-d886-4a67-873a-b778c738b546/dgaljnwxcaa1qup.jpg
> https://www.cnet.com/news/nasa-to-9-year-old-applicant-for-alien-protection-job-maybe/
> http://video.foxnews.com/v/5532959673001/?#sp=show-clips



you see now what 'science fiction' and fake science does to a kid...

NASA should tell the kid..."Why don't you stand on the corner and let us know when it begins to snow."




Guardian of the Galaxy? There is nothing to guard.


Hey Jack Davis you 9 year old, don't let these angry old white men at NASA steer you wrong.


Stay in school, grow up and become President of the United States and put the Media in jail where they belong.

Shut down NASA while you're at it...and legalize Marijuhnna.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web