Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #896149 > unrolled thread

Re: Non Newtonian Propulsion

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Non Newtonian Propulsion Jeremiah Jones <jj@j.j> - 2026-06-24 00:10 -0700
    Re: Non Newtonian Propulsion E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-24 10:32 +0000

#896149 — Re: Non Newtonian Propulsion

Rufus <ru@ru.ru> wrote:

> E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
> 
> > https://srcpublishers.com/physics-optics-sciences-jpsos/article/view/1547/1624

Lol. What a riot.



>
> A few suggestions for next time:
> 
> Submit to a peer-review process.
> 
> Your document is 3 years old.  Has the product not advanced at
> all since then?
> 
> Spend less time talking about how unsuitable rockets are, and
> more time on technical details of how your PNN Drive works (or
> doesn't work).
> 
> Vacuum (free space) does not have zero dielectric permitivity
> constant, nor zero magnetic permeability constant.  Your claim
> otherwise is a blunder that would embarrass a first-year
> college physics student.
> 
> Thrust is a force.  Grams are an SI unit of mass, not force.
> The SI unit of force is newtons (MKS) or dynes (CGS).
> 
> Don't use Google Translate to translate your work from
> Italian.  Get an english-fluent translator to compose the
> english version.
> 
> Don't use the paper as a for-sale ad for your prototype.
> 
> Don't use photocopies of charcoal-pencil drawings in a
> scientific paper.  Need readable drawings -- find someone who
> knows AutoCAD, or at least Windows Paint.  Provide enlarged
> copies.
> 
> Take photos in a real lab, not in your mother's broom closet.
> 
> 
> 
> YWIA, and I hope your next paper will be more enlightening and
> more convincing.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#896150

Jeremiah Jones <jj@j.j> posted:

> Rufus <ru@ru.ru> wrote:
> 
> > E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
> > 
> > > https://srcpublishers.com/physics-optics-sciences-jpsos/article/view/1547/1624
> 
> Lol. What a riot.
> 
> 

Divertiti con i comici razzi di Musk  :-) i.e. ciarle 
e zero colonizzazioni dal 1969
> 
> >
> > A few suggestions for next time:
> > 
> > Submit to a peer-review process.
> > 
> > Your document is 3 years old.  Has the product not advanced at
> > all since then?

Mi hanno chiesto loro un articolo e l'uscita l'ho saputa da Research Gate
Non avrete Aliena che può raggiungere Marte in 4 giorn a costi molto
bassi. Tenetevi gli idioti Bezos & Musk :-)


Do you want reach Mars without Musk comic ciarle + failures?


Follow us  
 
https://propulsion-revolution.com/subspace

very low costs using submarines



http://www.asps.it/nebila12.jpg







> > 
> > Spend less time talking about how unsuitable rockets are, and
> > more time on technical details of how your PNN Drive works (or
> > doesn't work).
> > 
> > Vacuum (free space) does not have zero dielectric permitivity
> > constant, nor zero magnetic permeability constant.  Your claim
> > otherwise is a blunder that would embarrass a first-year
> > college physics student.
> > 
> > Thrust is a force.  Grams are an SI unit of mass, not force.
> > The SI unit of force is newtons (MKS) or dynes (CGS).
> > 
> > Don't use Google Translate to translate your work from
> > Italian.  Get an english-fluent translator to compose the
> > english version.
> > 
> > Don't use the paper as a for-sale ad for your prototype.
> > 
> > Don't use photocopies of charcoal-pencil drawings in a
> > scientific paper.  Need readable drawings -- find someone who
> > knows AutoCAD, or at least Windows Paint.  Provide enlarged
> > copies.
> > 
> > Take photos in a real lab, not in your mother's broom closet.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > YWIA, and I hope your next paper will be more enlightening and
> > more convincing.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web