Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #596121 > unrolled thread

Game of Life

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Game of Life SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-09-06 20:17 -0400
    Re: Game of Life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-07 00:49 +0000
      Re: Game of Life SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-09-07 07:10 -0400
        Re: Game of Life Ergios <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-07 08:58 -0500
          Re: Game of Life SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-09-07 18:43 -0400
            Re: Game of Life richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2016-09-07 22:50 +0000
    Re: Game of Life Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-08 21:28 +0200
      Re: Game of Life SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-09-09 07:26 -0400
        Re: Game of Life Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-11 16:25 +0200
          Re: Game of Life Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 09:46 -0700
            Re: Game of Life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-11 18:14 +0000
              Re: Game of Life john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 11:49 -0700
              Re: Game of Life Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 14:52 -0700
                Re: Game of Life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-11 23:04 +0000
                  Re: Game of Life Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 17:00 -0700
                    Re: Game of Life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-12 00:55 +0000
                      Re: Game of Life Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 05:07 -0700
                        Re: Game of Life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-12 17:50 +0000
                          Re: Game of Life Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 12:54 -0700
                            Re: Game of Life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-12 21:07 +0000
                              Re: Game of Life Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 14:49 -0700
                                Re: Game of Life "Paul" <Paul123@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-13 08:13 -0700
                                  Re: Game of Life Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 11:30 -0700
                                    Re: Game of Life Sergoi <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-13 13:47 -0500
                                      Re: Game of Life Sergoi <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-13 13:49 -0500
                                        Re: Game of Life Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 12:15 -0700
                                      Re: Game of Life "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 12:23 -0700
                                        Re: Game of Life "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-13 14:09 -0700
            Re: Game of Life Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-12 01:01 +0200
              Re: Game of Life Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 16:47 -0700
      Re: Game of Life SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-09-09 07:54 -0400

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#596121 — Game of Life

Great rendidtion of John Conway's automation. Initially populate the
field randomly to a selectable percent. Field repeats infinitely in
all dirrections to avoid issues with border cells. Four selectable
field resolutions. Email if interested :  casagiannoni@optonline.net

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#596128

SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> wrote:
> Great rendidtion of John Conway's automation. Initially populate the
> field randomly to a selectable percent. Field repeats infinitely in
> all dirrections to avoid issues with border cells. Four selectable
> field resolutions. Email if interested :  casagiannoni@optonline.net

Really hot shit in 1971.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596155

Well it was, still is !

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596167

On 9/7/2016 6:10 AM, SteveGG wrote:
> Well it was, still is !
>

there is a nice site online to play many types of those.

lost the link,  Mike something something   java

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596229

You don't play the Game of Life, but just set it up and it plays
itself. Completely deterministic going forward, yet chaotic and
interesting. If you want a really nice rendition, written in
VisualBasic 6, Email casagiannoni@optonline.net 


On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 08:58:19 -0500, Ergios <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:

>On 9/7/2016 6:10 AM, SteveGG wrote:
>> Well it was, still is !
>>
>
>there is a nice site online to play many types of those.
>
>lost the link,  Mike something something   java

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596232

In article <th51tbprsujbc12p77ktko3jrr4c88i1bq@4ax.com>,
SteveGG  <casagiannoni@optonline.net> wrote:
>You don't play the Game of Life, but just set it up and it plays
>itself. Completely deterministic going forward, yet chaotic and
>interesting. If you want a really nice rendition, written in
>VisualBasic 6, Email [...]

That's enough advertising.

-- Richard

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596297

SteveGG wrote:

> Great rendidtion of John Conway's automation. […]

Which part of “sci.physics” did you not understand?

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596359

Science of chaos, even deterninistic chaos, is part of physics.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596548

SteveGG wrote:

> Science of chaos, even deterninistic chaos, is part of physics.

No, chaos theory is a field of study in *mathematics*.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596557

On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 10:25:37 AM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> SteveGG wrote:
> 
> > Science of chaos, even deterninistic chaos, is part of physics.

Your typo deterninistic is deterministically funny. All good.
 
> No, chaos theory is a field of study in *mathematics*.

Chaos theory is also a study of particle dynamics. Now you finally know.

What makes you so dense 'PointedEars'? All math is subject to and of physics.

So what makes you Thomas so dense to and from logic?

If you want to come to Usenet just to make enemies, then go elsewhere.

> -- 
> PointedEars
> 
> Twitter: @PointedEars2
> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

I've got a couple of Twitter accounts meself m(y)self. Rarely use them.

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596566

Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 10:25:37 AM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> SteveGG wrote:
>> 
>> > Science of chaos, even deterninistic chaos, is part of physics.
> 
> Your typo deterninistic is deterministically funny. All good.
>  
>> No, chaos theory is a field of study in *mathematics*.
> 
> Chaos theory is also a study of particle dynamics. Now you finally know.

Chaos theory can be applied to the study of particle dynamics.

> What makes you so dense 'PointedEars'? All math is subject to and of physics.

You have it backwards.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596573

>>>>>Mahipal <mahip...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 10:25:37 AM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: 
>> SteveGG wrote: 
>> 
>> > Science of chaos, even deterninistic chaos, is part of physics. 
> 
> Your typo deterninistic is deterministically funny. All good. 
>   
>> No, chaos theory is a field of study in *mathematics*. 
> 
> Chaos theory is also a study of particle dynamics. Now you finally know. 

Chaos theory can be applied to the study of particle dynamics. 

> What makes you so dense 'PointedEars'? All math is subject to and of physics. 

You have it backwards. >>>>>

So.
Electrons have a PERIOD!!!!!!
Physics IS SUBJECT TO MATH you say.
So.
Electrons take the same path every
time.
QM is wrong 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596606

On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 2:16:09 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 10:25:37 AM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> >> SteveGG wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Science of chaos, even deterninistic chaos, is part of physics.
> > 
> > Your typo deterninistic is deterministically funny. All good.
> >  
> >> No, chaos theory is a field of study in *mathematics*.
> > 
> > Chaos theory is also a study of particle dynamics. Now you finally know.
> 
> Chaos theory can be applied to the study of particle dynamics.

JimJi, we two are on the same page. I said the same think. Forgive my words.
 
> > What makes you so dense 'PointedEars'? All math is subject to and of physics.
> 
> You have it backwards.

Sky Pilot JimJi... So all physics is subject to and of math? No. In any language.

> -- 
> Jim Pennino

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596625

Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 2:16:09 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 10:25:37 AM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> >> SteveGG wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > Science of chaos, even deterninistic chaos, is part of physics.
>> > 
>> > Your typo deterninistic is deterministically funny. All good.
>> >  
>> >> No, chaos theory is a field of study in *mathematics*.
>> > 
>> > Chaos theory is also a study of particle dynamics. Now you finally know.
>> 
>> Chaos theory can be applied to the study of particle dynamics.
> 
> JimJi, we two are on the same page. I said the same think. Forgive my words.
>  
>> > What makes you so dense 'PointedEars'? All math is subject to and of physics.
>> 
>> You have it backwards.
> 
> Sky Pilot JimJi... So all physics is subject to and of math? No. In any language.

Math was driven by physics in antiquity by the need to DESCRIBE the
physical world in something other than words. This led to the development
of geometry in the very early days of science then to things like calculus.

During that period there was little distinction between physics and
mathematics.

All that pretty much ended in the nineteenth century.
 
You are about 200 years behind the times.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596634

On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 7:16:05 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 2:16:09 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >> Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 10:25:37 AM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> >> >> SteveGG wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> > Science of chaos, even deterninistic chaos, is part of physics.
> >> > 
> >> > Your typo deterninistic is deterministically funny. All good.
> >> >  
> >> >> No, chaos theory is a field of study in *mathematics*.
> >> > 
> >> > Chaos theory is also a study of particle dynamics. Now you finally know.
> >> 
> >> Chaos theory can be applied to the study of particle dynamics.
> > 
> > JimJi, we two are on the same page. I said the same think. Forgive my words.
> >  
> >> > What makes you so dense 'PointedEars'? All math is subject to and of physics.
> >> 
> >> You have it backwards.
> > 
> > Sky Pilot JimJi... So all physics is subject to and of math? No. In any language.
> 
> Math was driven by physics in antiquity by the need to DESCRIBE the
> physical world in something other than words. This led to the development
> of geometry in the very early days of science then to things like calculus.

I know more about Calculus than you can feign to pilot, Sir JimJi.

> During that period there was little distinction between physics and
> mathematics.

Math is not physics. Deal with it. Any fucking generation.

> All that pretty much ended in the nineteenth century.
>  
> You are about 200 years behind the times.

Only 200? You are too kind. Bring it on... I'm right here.

> -- 
> Jim Pennino

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596639

Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 7:16:05 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 2:16:09 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 10:25:37 AM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> >> >> SteveGG wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > Science of chaos, even deterninistic chaos, is part of physics.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Your typo deterninistic is deterministically funny. All good.
>> >> >  
>> >> >> No, chaos theory is a field of study in *mathematics*.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Chaos theory is also a study of particle dynamics. Now you finally know.
>> >> 
>> >> Chaos theory can be applied to the study of particle dynamics.
>> > 
>> > JimJi, we two are on the same page. I said the same think. Forgive my words.
>> >  
>> >> > What makes you so dense 'PointedEars'? All math is subject to and of physics.
>> >> 
>> >> You have it backwards.
>> > 
>> > Sky Pilot JimJi... So all physics is subject to and of math? No. In any language.
>> 
>> Math was driven by physics in antiquity by the need to DESCRIBE the
>> physical world in something other than words. This led to the development
>> of geometry in the very early days of science then to things like calculus.
> 
> I know more about Calculus than you can feign to pilot, Sir JimJi.

Pure bragging totally irrelevant to the discussion. FYI I stopped the
math classes after partial differential equations as there weren't
anymore to take.

Calculus is not a proper noun and is not capitalized unless it is the
first word in a sentence.

>> During that period there was little distinction between physics and
>> mathematics.
> 
> Math is not physics. Deal with it. Any fucking generation.

Mathematics and physics were essentially inseperable for a very long time.

>> All that pretty much ended in the nineteenth century.
>>  
>> You are about 200 years behind the times.
> 
> Only 200? You are too kind. Bring it on... I'm right here.

Bring what on?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596661

On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 9:01:05 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 7:16:05 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >> Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 2:16:09 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >> >> Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 10:25:37 AM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> >> >> >> SteveGG wrote:
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> > Science of chaos, even deterninistic chaos, is part of physics.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Your typo deterninistic is deterministically funny. All good.
> >> >> >  
> >> >> >> No, chaos theory is a field of study in *mathematics*.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Chaos theory is also a study of particle dynamics. Now you finally know.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Chaos theory can be applied to the study of particle dynamics.
> >> > 
> >> > JimJi, we two are on the same page. I said the same think. Forgive my words.
> >> >  
> >> >> > What makes you so dense 'PointedEars'? All math is subject to and of physics.
> >> >> 
> >> >> You have it backwards.
> >> > 
> >> > Sky Pilot JimJi... So all physics is subject to and of math? No. In any language.
> >> 
> >> Math was driven by physics in antiquity by the need to DESCRIBE the
> >> physical world in something other than words. This led to the development
> >> of geometry in the very early days of science then to things like calculus.
> > 
> > I know more about Calculus than you can feign to pilot, Sir JimJi.
> 
> Pure bragging totally irrelevant to the discussion. FYI I stopped the
> math classes after partial differential equations as there weren't
> anymore to take.

Fine. I agree with you. You JimJi are correct regards the irrelevancy.
Lucky for you, I discuss for a general audience. It's called talking.
 
> Calculus is not a proper noun and is not capitalized unless it is the
> first word in a sentence.

There was/is nothing wrong with my word Calculus calculus CALCULUS. Grow up.
 
> >> During that period there was little distinction between physics and
> >> mathematics.
> > 
> > Math is not physics. Deal with it. Any fucking generation.
> 
> Mathematics and physics were essentially inseperable for a very long time.

They are no longer conjoined. It's not me m(y) personal problem, anymore.
 
> >> All that pretty much ended in the nineteenth century.
> >>  
> >> You are about 200 years behind the times.
> > 
> > Only 200? You are too kind. Bring it on... I'm right here.
> 
> Bring what on?

Anything at all. Time waits for no one, not even you me or us...

> -- 
> Jim Pennino

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596683

Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 9:01:05 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 7:16:05 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 2:16:09 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> >> Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 10:25:37 AM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> >> >> >> SteveGG wrote:
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > Science of chaos, even deterninistic chaos, is part of physics.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Your typo deterninistic is deterministically funny. All good.
>> >> >> >  
>> >> >> >> No, chaos theory is a field of study in *mathematics*.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Chaos theory is also a study of particle dynamics. Now you finally know.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Chaos theory can be applied to the study of particle dynamics.
>> >> > 
>> >> > JimJi, we two are on the same page. I said the same think. Forgive my words.
>> >> >  
>> >> >> > What makes you so dense 'PointedEars'? All math is subject to and of physics.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> You have it backwards.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Sky Pilot JimJi... So all physics is subject to and of math? No. In any language.
>> >> 
>> >> Math was driven by physics in antiquity by the need to DESCRIBE the
>> >> physical world in something other than words. This led to the development
>> >> of geometry in the very early days of science then to things like calculus.
>> > 
>> > I know more about Calculus than you can feign to pilot, Sir JimJi.
>> 
>> Pure bragging totally irrelevant to the discussion. FYI I stopped the
>> math classes after partial differential equations as there weren't
>> anymore to take.
> 
> Fine. I agree with you. You JimJi are correct regards the irrelevancy.
> Lucky for you, I discuss for a general audience. It's called talking.

Nope, it's called dick waving.

>> Calculus is not a proper noun and is not capitalized unless it is the
>> first word in a sentence.
> 
> There was/is nothing wrong with my word Calculus calculus CALCULUS. Grow up.

Learn English if you are going to post in English.

Today's lesson: http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/capital.asp

>> >> During that period there was little distinction between physics and
>> >> mathematics.
>> > 
>> > Math is not physics. Deal with it. Any fucking generation.
>> 
>> Mathematics and physics were essentially inseperable for a very long time.
> 
> They are no longer conjoined. It's not me m(y) personal problem, anymore.

That is what I have said twice now. I'm glad you finally got it.

>> >> All that pretty much ended in the nineteenth century.
>> >>  
>> >> You are about 200 years behind the times.
>> > 
>> > Only 200? You are too kind. Bring it on... I'm right here.
>> 
>> Bring what on?
> 
> Anything at all. Time waits for no one, not even you me or us...

Is this supposed to mean something?

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596699

On Monday, September 12, 2016 at 2:01:06 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:

<trim>

> >> >> >> > What makes you so dense 'PointedEars'? All math is subject to and of physics.
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> You have it backwards.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Sky Pilot JimJi... So all physics is subject to and of math? No. In any language.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Math was driven by physics in antiquity by the need to DESCRIBE the
> >> >> physical world in something other than words. This led to the development
> >> >> of geometry in the very early days of science then to things like calculus.
> >> > 
> >> > I know more about Calculus than you can feign to pilot, Sir JimJi.
> >> 
> >> Pure bragging totally irrelevant to the discussion. FYI I stopped the
> >> math classes after partial differential equations as there weren't
> >> anymore to take.
> > 
> > Fine. I agree with you. You JimJi are correct regards the irrelevancy.
> > Lucky for you, I discuss for a general audience. It's called talking.
> 
> Nope, it's called dick waving.

Well, be that as it may. What do women wave? FTR, I am not female.

> >> Calculus is not a proper noun and is not capitalized unless it is the
> >> first word in a sentence.
> > 
> > There was/is nothing wrong with my word Calculus calculus CALCULUS. Grow up.
> 
> Learn English if you are going to post in English.

Eat SHIT and die, Sir JimJi! My English is better and deeper than all!

> Today's lesson: http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/capital.asp

Nobody, even I, gives a ...youKnow.
 
> >> >> During that period there was little distinction between physics and
> >> >> mathematics.
> >> > 
> >> > Math is not physics. Deal with it. Any fucking generation.
> >> 
> >> Mathematics and physics were essentially inseperable for a very long time.
> > 
> > They are no longer conjoined. It's not me m(y) personal problem, anymore.
> 
> That is what I have said twice now. I'm glad you finally got it.

I've always liked your postings. That's become my problem, now.
 
> >> >> All that pretty much ended in the nineteenth century.
> >> >>  
> >> >> You are about 200 years behind the times.
> >> > 
> >> > Only 200? You are too kind. Bring it on... I'm right here.
> >> 
> >> Bring what on?
> > 
> > Anything at all. Time waits for no one, not even you me or us...
> 
> Is this supposed to mean something?

Not to you, apparently. Wink your eyes, let a thousand years go by.

> -- 
> Jim Pennino

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596717

Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, September 12, 2016 at 2:01:06 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> <trim>
> 
>> >> >> >> > What makes you so dense 'PointedEars'? All math is subject to and of physics.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> You have it backwards.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Sky Pilot JimJi... So all physics is subject to and of math? No. In any language.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Math was driven by physics in antiquity by the need to DESCRIBE the
>> >> >> physical world in something other than words. This led to the development
>> >> >> of geometry in the very early days of science then to things like calculus.
>> >> > 
>> >> > I know more about Calculus than you can feign to pilot, Sir JimJi.
>> >> 
>> >> Pure bragging totally irrelevant to the discussion. FYI I stopped the
>> >> math classes after partial differential equations as there weren't
>> >> anymore to take.
>> > 
>> > Fine. I agree with you. You JimJi are correct regards the irrelevancy.
>> > Lucky for you, I discuss for a general audience. It's called talking.
>> 
>> Nope, it's called dick waving.
> 
> Well, be that as it may. What do women wave? FTR, I am not female.
> 
>> >> Calculus is not a proper noun and is not capitalized unless it is the
>> >> first word in a sentence.
>> > 
>> > There was/is nothing wrong with my word Calculus calculus CALCULUS. Grow up.
>> 
>> Learn English if you are going to post in English.
> 
> Eat SHIT and die, Sir JimJi! My English is better and deeper than all!

Your English is like a cartoon stereotype; Apu on the Simpsons comes
to mind.

>> Today's lesson: http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/capital.asp
> 
> Nobody, even I, gives a ...youKnow.

Obviously you either know or care nothing about English grammar.

>> >> >> During that period there was little distinction between physics and
>> >> >> mathematics.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Math is not physics. Deal with it. Any fucking generation.
>> >> 
>> >> Mathematics and physics were essentially inseperable for a very long time.
>> > 
>> > They are no longer conjoined. It's not me m(y) personal problem, anymore.
>> 
>> That is what I have said twice now. I'm glad you finally got it.
> 
> I've always liked your postings. That's become my problem, now.
>  
>> >> >> All that pretty much ended in the nineteenth century.
>> >> >>  
>> >> >> You are about 200 years behind the times.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Only 200? You are too kind. Bring it on... I'm right here.
>> >> 
>> >> Bring what on?
>> > 
>> > Anything at all. Time waits for no one, not even you me or us...
>> 
>> Is this supposed to mean something?
> 
> Not to you, apparently. Wink your eyes, let a thousand years go by.

Whatever, Apu.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web