Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #529206 > unrolled thread

“Top 10″ Surprises from the Pluto Flyby

Started bySam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
First post2015-10-30 15:33 -0500
Last post2015-10-30 21:16 +0000
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  “Top 10″ Surprises from the Pluto Flyby Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 15:33 -0500
    Re: screwed up non-ASCII text jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 21:16 +0000

#529206 — “Top 10″ Surprises from the Pluto Flyby

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-30 15:33 -0500
Subject“Top 10″ Surprises from the Pluto Flyby
Message-ID<DYOdnelIT7ysSa7LnZ2dnUU7-YnOydjZ@giganews.com>
“Top 10″ Surprises from the Pluto Flyby
> http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/top-10-surprises-from-the-pluto-flyby/
> http://www.skyandtelescope.com/wp-content/uploads/Northern-Sputnik-Planum.jpg


> It sounds like science fiction, but it's not: NASA's New Horizons
> mission explored the Pluto system last summer — and here's my "top
> 10" list of what's surprised me the most about the results so far.
> (By the way, I didn't order this list below in terms of my "surprise
> factor.")

> No New Moons. I don't know about you, but I sure expected that we'd
> find more satellites circling Pluto. After finding four moons with
> successively deeper searches by the Hubble Space Telescope, I'm still
> amazed that our spacecraft searched with 20 to 30 times better
> sensitivity than Hubble and found nothing. Nada. Zip.
>
> Pluto is Bigger Than Eris. Before the flyby, Pluto's diameter was
> somewhat uncertain, with most estimates being between 2,300 and 2,400
> km (though some researchers put the lower limit down as far as 2,280
> km). By comparison, we knew the diameter of Eris is 2,326 ±12 km, and
> much of the safe money was on Pluto being the second biggest body in
> the Kuiper Belt. But now, thanks to images from New Horizons, we've
> measured Pluto's diameter accurately — it's 2,374 ±6 km — making
> Pluto the clear king of the Kuiper Belt.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#529241 — Re: screwed up non-ASCII text

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-10-30 21:16 +0000
SubjectRe: screwed up non-ASCII text
Message-ID<0b3dgc-jl5.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#529206
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> “Top 10″ Surprises from the Pluto Flyby
>> http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/top-10-surprises-from-the-pluto-flyby/
>> http://www.skyandtelescope.com/wp-content/uploads/Northern-Sputnik-Planum.jpg
> 
> 
>> It sounds like science fiction, but it's not: NASA's New Horizons
>> mission explored the Pluto system last summer — and here's my "top
>> 10" list of what's surprised me the most about the results so far.
>> (By the way, I didn't order this list below in terms of my "surprise
>> factor.")
> 
>> No New Moons. I don't know about you, but I sure expected that we'd
>> find more satellites circling Pluto. After finding four moons with
>> successively deeper searches by the Hubble Space Telescope, I'm still
>> amazed that our spacecraft searched with 20 to 30 times better
>> sensitivity than Hubble and found nothing. Nada. Zip.
>>
>> Pluto is Bigger Than Eris. Before the flyby, Pluto's diameter was
>> somewhat uncertain, with most estimates being between 2,300 and 2,400
>> km (though some researchers put the lower limit down as far as 2,280
>> km). By comparison, we knew the diameter of Eris is 2,326 ±12 km, and
>> much of the safe money was on Pluto being the second biggest body in
>> the Kuiper Belt. But now, thanks to images from New Horizons, we've
>> measured Pluto's diameter accurately — it's 2,374 ±6 km — making
>> Pluto the clear king of the Kuiper Belt.
 
You continue to cut and paste HTML encoded characters to an ASCII
discussion group, spamming shit head.

This is likely the only discussion you will receive on your latest
worthless cut and paste, spamming shit head.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web