Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #605793 > unrolled thread
| Started by | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-11-21 17:08 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-11-30 06:05 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 138 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-21 17:08 -0500
REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 14:33 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 07:18 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 05:47 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 11:51 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:56 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 08:55 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 07:39 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 10:05 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:07 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:11 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 10:15 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 12:31 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:52 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-23 18:23 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:49 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:46 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 20:09 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 07:35 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 17:11 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 16:15 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 19:37 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 09:04 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 12:50 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-30 17:55 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 12:53 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-30 17:56 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 08:11 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 16:33 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 03:59 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 10:49 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 11:50 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 18:18 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-02 23:54 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 19:07 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-03 01:10 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 18:14 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-02 23:27 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 19:11 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-03 01:12 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 05:19 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-03 18:13 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-04 09:48 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:40 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-22 17:50 +0000
REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 15:12 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-21 19:14 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 18:50 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:31 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-22 23:06 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 20:29 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-23 01:50 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:22 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:03 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:39 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:03 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 21:53 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:07 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:29 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:41 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:38 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:40 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:16 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:34 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:43 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:58 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 17:12 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 20:27 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-23 01:52 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:25 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:06 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:42 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:06 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 21:55 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:09 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:30 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:42 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:40 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:43 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:18 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:35 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:43 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:59 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 04:35 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-23 18:20 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:59 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:09 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:44 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:16 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 21:58 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:14 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:32 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:52 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:41 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:45 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:26 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:43 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:45 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 06:02 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:41 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:10 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:46 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:17 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 21:59 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:15 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:33 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:54 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:43 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:46 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:31 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:44 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:46 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 06:04 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 07:59 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 08:13 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 08:20 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 09:46 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 08:57 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 10:38 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 17:16 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:47 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:43 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:37 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 18:31 -0800
premote fiewing **** noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 19:59 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:12 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:47 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:19 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 22:05 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:17 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:34 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:55 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:44 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:49 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:32 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:49 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:46 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 06:05 +0000
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-24 01:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <0arhgd-mik.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #606279 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/23/2016 7:35 AM, HVAC wrote: >> benj >> - show quoted text - >> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >> ------------ >> >> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >> >> It's as simple as that. Trust me. > > The scientists running the project disagree with you. And even more fun > is the fact that many of the "best" results are still classified. Of > course you are privy to all of those due to your "need to know". You are > such a blowhard, HVAC. You make Bert look positively sane. The kook answer to null results is always "they" classified the results. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-26 19:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583a2ce5$0$12009$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #606302 |
On 11/23/2016 8:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/23/2016 7:35 AM, HVAC wrote: >>> benj >>> - show quoted text - >>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>> ------------ >>> >>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>> >>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >> >> The scientists running the project disagree with you. And even more fun >> is the fact that many of the "best" results are still classified. Of >> course you are privy to all of those due to your "need to know". You are >> such a blowhard, HVAC. You make Bert look positively sane. > > The kook answer to null results is always "they" classified the results. You pretend to have worked on classified projects. I"m guessing like Bert and HVAC it's all fantasy. How many lectures have you ever given in the "Eddington wing" of MIT? Bet they nominated you for a Nobel, right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-27 02:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <paspgd-8gh.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #606596 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/23/2016 8:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/23/2016 7:35 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>> benj >>>> - show quoted text - >>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>> ------------ >>>> >>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>> >>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>> >>> The scientists running the project disagree with you. And even more fun >>> is the fact that many of the "best" results are still classified. Of >>> course you are privy to all of those due to your "need to know". You are >>> such a blowhard, HVAC. You make Bert look positively sane. >> >> The kook answer to null results is always "they" classified the results. > > You pretend to have worked on classified projects. I"m guessing like > Bert and HVAC it's all fantasy. How many lectures have you ever given in > the "Eddington wing" of MIT? Bet they nominated you for a Nobel, right? Was there supposed to be some point to this rambling babble kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-26 21:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583a4c11$0$55957$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #606620 |
On 11/26/2016 9:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/23/2016 8:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/23/2016 7:35 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>> benj >>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>> ------------ >>>>> >>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>> >>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>> >>>> The scientists running the project disagree with you. And even more fun >>>> is the fact that many of the "best" results are still classified. Of >>>> course you are privy to all of those due to your "need to know". You are >>>> such a blowhard, HVAC. You make Bert look positively sane. >>> >>> The kook answer to null results is always "they" classified the results. >> >> You pretend to have worked on classified projects. I"m guessing like >> Bert and HVAC it's all fantasy. How many lectures have you ever given in >> the "Eddington wing" of MIT? Bet they nominated you for a Nobel, right? > > Was there supposed to be some point to this rambling babble kook? > Yes, you are a babbling senile loon. Point made.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-27 04:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <b83qgd-j5i.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #606628 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/26/2016 9:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/23/2016 8:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/23/2016 7:35 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>> benj >>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>> ------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>> >>>>> The scientists running the project disagree with you. And even more fun >>>>> is the fact that many of the "best" results are still classified. Of >>>>> course you are privy to all of those due to your "need to know". You are >>>>> such a blowhard, HVAC. You make Bert look positively sane. >>>> >>>> The kook answer to null results is always "they" classified the results. >>> >>> You pretend to have worked on classified projects. I"m guessing like >>> Bert and HVAC it's all fantasy. How many lectures have you ever given in >>> the "Eddington wing" of MIT? Bet they nominated you for a Nobel, right? >> >> Was there supposed to be some point to this rambling babble kook? >> > Yes, you are a babbling senile loon. Point made. Hardly kook. The only point you have made is that you are incapable of forming a cogent paragraph kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-28 16:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583ca2a2$0$51784$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #606651 |
On 11/26/2016 11:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/26/2016 9:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/23/2016 8:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/23/2016 7:35 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>> benj >>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>>> >>>>>> The scientists running the project disagree with you. And even more fun >>>>>> is the fact that many of the "best" results are still classified. Of >>>>>> course you are privy to all of those due to your "need to know". You are >>>>>> such a blowhard, HVAC. You make Bert look positively sane. >>>>> >>>>> The kook answer to null results is always "they" classified the results. >>>> >>>> You pretend to have worked on classified projects. I"m guessing like >>>> Bert and HVAC it's all fantasy. How many lectures have you ever given in >>>> the "Eddington wing" of MIT? Bet they nominated you for a Nobel, right? >>> >>> Was there supposed to be some point to this rambling babble kook? >>> >> Yes, you are a babbling senile loon. Point made. > > Hardly kook. > > The only point you have made is that you are incapable of forming a > cogent paragraph kook. So you judge all science according to your literary values. Gosh so does Hardblow. Non-science people are all the same.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 01:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rn3vgd-o95.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #606897 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/26/2016 11:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/26/2016 9:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 7:35 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>>> benj >>>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The scientists running the project disagree with you. And even more fun >>>>>>> is the fact that many of the "best" results are still classified. Of >>>>>>> course you are privy to all of those due to your "need to know". You are >>>>>>> such a blowhard, HVAC. You make Bert look positively sane. >>>>>> >>>>>> The kook answer to null results is always "they" classified the results. >>>>> >>>>> You pretend to have worked on classified projects. I"m guessing like >>>>> Bert and HVAC it's all fantasy. How many lectures have you ever given in >>>>> the "Eddington wing" of MIT? Bet they nominated you for a Nobel, right? >>>> >>>> Was there supposed to be some point to this rambling babble kook? >>>> >>> Yes, you are a babbling senile loon. Point made. >> >> Hardly kook. >> >> The only point you have made is that you are incapable of forming a >> cogent paragraph kook. > > So you judge all science according to your literary values. Gosh so does > Hardblow. Non-science people are all the same. Nope but I do judge kooks by throwing random babbling sentences together. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 17:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583e0485$0$55876$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #606981 |
On 11/28/2016 8:54 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/26/2016 11:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/26/2016 9:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 7:35 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>>>> benj >>>>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The scientists running the project disagree with you. And even more fun >>>>>>>> is the fact that many of the "best" results are still classified. Of >>>>>>>> course you are privy to all of those due to your "need to know". You are >>>>>>>> such a blowhard, HVAC. You make Bert look positively sane. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The kook answer to null results is always "they" classified the results. >>>>>> >>>>>> You pretend to have worked on classified projects. I"m guessing like >>>>>> Bert and HVAC it's all fantasy. How many lectures have you ever given in >>>>>> the "Eddington wing" of MIT? Bet they nominated you for a Nobel, right? >>>>> >>>>> Was there supposed to be some point to this rambling babble kook? >>>>> >>>> Yes, you are a babbling senile loon. Point made. >>> >>> Hardly kook. >>> >>> The only point you have made is that you are incapable of forming a >>> cogent paragraph kook. >> >> So you judge all science according to your literary values. Gosh so does >> Hardblow. Non-science people are all the same. > > Nope but I do judge kooks by throwing random babbling sentences together. > To you and Hardblow, science you can't understand is all "babble" to you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 23:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gkg1hd-ile.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #607090 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/28/2016 8:54 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/26/2016 11:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 7:35 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>>>>> benj >>>>>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The scientists running the project disagree with you. And even more fun >>>>>>>>> is the fact that many of the "best" results are still classified. Of >>>>>>>>> course you are privy to all of those due to your "need to know". You are >>>>>>>>> such a blowhard, HVAC. You make Bert look positively sane. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The kook answer to null results is always "they" classified the results. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You pretend to have worked on classified projects. I"m guessing like >>>>>>> Bert and HVAC it's all fantasy. How many lectures have you ever given in >>>>>>> the "Eddington wing" of MIT? Bet they nominated you for a Nobel, right? >>>>>> >>>>>> Was there supposed to be some point to this rambling babble kook? >>>>>> >>>>> Yes, you are a babbling senile loon. Point made. >>>> >>>> Hardly kook. >>>> >>>> The only point you have made is that you are incapable of forming a >>>> cogent paragraph kook. >>> >>> So you judge all science according to your literary values. Gosh so does >>> Hardblow. Non-science people are all the same. >> >> Nope but I do judge kooks by throwing random babbling sentences together. >> > To you and Hardblow, science you can't understand is all "babble" to you. What science would that be kook? That the kook "HAARP patent" actually has something to do with HAARP and that contrails are more than engine exhaust gases and water vapor kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 19:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583e1dec$0$51680$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #607127 |
On 11/29/2016 6:46 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/28/2016 8:54 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/26/2016 11:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 7:35 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> benj >>>>>>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The scientists running the project disagree with you. And even more fun >>>>>>>>>> is the fact that many of the "best" results are still classified. Of >>>>>>>>>> course you are privy to all of those due to your "need to know". You are >>>>>>>>>> such a blowhard, HVAC. You make Bert look positively sane. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The kook answer to null results is always "they" classified the results. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You pretend to have worked on classified projects. I"m guessing like >>>>>>>> Bert and HVAC it's all fantasy. How many lectures have you ever given in >>>>>>>> the "Eddington wing" of MIT? Bet they nominated you for a Nobel, right? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Was there supposed to be some point to this rambling babble kook? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, you are a babbling senile loon. Point made. >>>>> >>>>> Hardly kook. >>>>> >>>>> The only point you have made is that you are incapable of forming a >>>>> cogent paragraph kook. >>>> >>>> So you judge all science according to your literary values. Gosh so does >>>> Hardblow. Non-science people are all the same. >>> >>> Nope but I do judge kooks by throwing random babbling sentences together. >>> >> To you and Hardblow, science you can't understand is all "babble" to you. > > What science would that be kook? > > That the kook "HAARP patent" actually has something to do with HAARP > and that contrails are more than engine exhaust gases and water vapor > kook? > > You stalking me chimp? I can understand your obsession with me. I am smarter than anything you've ever seen before.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-30 01:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ahn1hd-s9f.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #607143 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/29/2016 6:46 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/28/2016 8:54 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/26/2016 11:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 7:35 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> benj >>>>>>>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The scientists running the project disagree with you. And even more fun >>>>>>>>>>> is the fact that many of the "best" results are still classified. Of >>>>>>>>>>> course you are privy to all of those due to your "need to know". You are >>>>>>>>>>> such a blowhard, HVAC. You make Bert look positively sane. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The kook answer to null results is always "they" classified the results. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You pretend to have worked on classified projects. I"m guessing like >>>>>>>>> Bert and HVAC it's all fantasy. How many lectures have you ever given in >>>>>>>>> the "Eddington wing" of MIT? Bet they nominated you for a Nobel, right? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Was there supposed to be some point to this rambling babble kook? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, you are a babbling senile loon. Point made. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hardly kook. >>>>>> >>>>>> The only point you have made is that you are incapable of forming a >>>>>> cogent paragraph kook. >>>>> >>>>> So you judge all science according to your literary values. Gosh so does >>>>> Hardblow. Non-science people are all the same. >>>> >>>> Nope but I do judge kooks by throwing random babbling sentences together. >>>> >>> To you and Hardblow, science you can't understand is all "babble" to you. >> >> What science would that be kook? >> >> That the kook "HAARP patent" actually has something to do with HAARP >> and that contrails are more than engine exhaust gases and water vapor >> kook? >> >> > You stalking me chimp? I can understand your obsession with me. I am > smarter than anything you've ever seen before. Just trying to get you to state what you think science is kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 21:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583e3d75$0$10193$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #607163 |
On 11/29/2016 8:44 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/29/2016 6:46 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/28/2016 8:54 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/26/2016 11:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 7:35 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> benj >>>>>>>>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The scientists running the project disagree with you. And even more fun >>>>>>>>>>>> is the fact that many of the "best" results are still classified. Of >>>>>>>>>>>> course you are privy to all of those due to your "need to know". You are >>>>>>>>>>>> such a blowhard, HVAC. You make Bert look positively sane. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The kook answer to null results is always "they" classified the results. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You pretend to have worked on classified projects. I"m guessing like >>>>>>>>>> Bert and HVAC it's all fantasy. How many lectures have you ever given in >>>>>>>>>> the "Eddington wing" of MIT? Bet they nominated you for a Nobel, right? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Was there supposed to be some point to this rambling babble kook? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, you are a babbling senile loon. Point made. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hardly kook. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The only point you have made is that you are incapable of forming a >>>>>>> cogent paragraph kook. >>>>>> >>>>>> So you judge all science according to your literary values. Gosh so does >>>>>> Hardblow. Non-science people are all the same. >>>>> >>>>> Nope but I do judge kooks by throwing random babbling sentences together. >>>>> >>>> To you and Hardblow, science you can't understand is all "babble" to you. >>> >>> What science would that be kook? >>> >>> That the kook "HAARP patent" actually has something to do with HAARP >>> and that contrails are more than engine exhaust gases and water vapor >>> kook? >>> >>> >> You stalking me chimp? I can understand your obsession with me. I am >> smarter than anything you've ever seen before. > > Just trying to get you to state what you think science is kook. > > You know no science. Stalker.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-30 06:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <un62hd-9sg.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #607188 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/29/2016 8:44 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/29/2016 6:46 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/28/2016 8:54 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 11:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:10 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 7:35 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> benj >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The scientists running the project disagree with you. And even more fun >>>>>>>>>>>>> is the fact that many of the "best" results are still classified. Of >>>>>>>>>>>>> course you are privy to all of those due to your "need to know". You are >>>>>>>>>>>>> such a blowhard, HVAC. You make Bert look positively sane. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The kook answer to null results is always "they" classified the results. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You pretend to have worked on classified projects. I"m guessing like >>>>>>>>>>> Bert and HVAC it's all fantasy. How many lectures have you ever given in >>>>>>>>>>> the "Eddington wing" of MIT? Bet they nominated you for a Nobel, right? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Was there supposed to be some point to this rambling babble kook? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes, you are a babbling senile loon. Point made. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hardly kook. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The only point you have made is that you are incapable of forming a >>>>>>>> cogent paragraph kook. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So you judge all science according to your literary values. Gosh so does >>>>>>> Hardblow. Non-science people are all the same. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope but I do judge kooks by throwing random babbling sentences together. >>>>>> >>>>> To you and Hardblow, science you can't understand is all "babble" to you. >>>> >>>> What science would that be kook? >>>> >>>> That the kook "HAARP patent" actually has something to do with HAARP >>>> and that contrails are more than engine exhaust gases and water vapor >>>> kook? >>>> >>>> >>> You stalking me chimp? I can understand your obsession with me. I am >>> smarter than anything you've ever seen before. >> >> Just trying to get you to state what you think science is kook. >> >> > You know no science. > Stalker. Says the kook who thinks counting is fantasy. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-27 07:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <f4690bde-d5e6-4910-844f-db6d642002e8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #606279 |
BJ quacked > There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. > > It's as simple as that. Trust me. The scientists running the project disagree with you. And even more fun is the fact that many of the "best" results are still classified. Of course you are privy to all of those due to your "need to know". ---------- If the 'best' results are classified, how do you know about them? Your logic kung fu is weak. And why on earth would *I* have a need to know? I don't even currently work for any known government agency or organization
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-27 08:13 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e19ed401-3797-4519-b67c-d769b323ebc8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #606685 |
On Sunday, November 27, 2016 at 10:59:46 AM UTC-5, HVAC shat: > BJ quacked > > There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. > > > > It's as simple as that. Trust me. > > The scientists running the project disagree with you. And even more fun > is the fact that many of the "best" results are still classified. Of > course you are privy to all of those due to your "need to know". > ---------- > > If the 'best' results are classified, how do you know about them? > Your logic kung fu is weak. > And why on earth would *I* have a need to know? I don't even >currently work for any known government agency or organization Fake News! Get your Fake News! Not to worry, we'll never run out of Fake News. Thusfar, about 33 messages have been deleted in this thread alone. Now back to your regularly scheduled Fake Commercials. Go Buy buy BUY! Even better than the real thing -- U2. -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: Poet Pla(y)ing Tennis! Grasshopper Mode...”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-27 08:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7626d904-941b-4052-903b-3fd72d5c81f5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #606687 |
Maple loops Now back to your regularly scheduled Fake Commercials. Go Buy buy BUY! Even better than the real thing -- U2. ---------- U2 sucks dead dog dick. You too
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-27 09:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <cf8c4f9f-8e1c-4234-8ab3-063336473c5c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #606689 |
On Sunday, November 27, 2016 at 11:20:40 AM UTC-5, HVAC wrote: > Maple loops >> Now back to your regularly scheduled Fake Commercials. Go Buy buy BUY! >> >> Even better than the real thing -- U2. > ---------- > > U2 sucks dead dog dick. You too That's needlessly too graphic, mostly ugly. Does it warm your cockles, HVAC? U2 is a ray of hope in an otherwise wasted generation lost to deep music. Bon Jovi, O wait... Bono is it... O crap... what was my point here?! She moves in mysterious ways, in a cold November rain -- U2+youKnow. -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-28 08:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9692e2df-b44a-4079-a4ad-cf794c96c6d6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #606696 |
Maple loops says > U2 sucks dead dog dick. You too That's needlessly too graphic, mostly ugly. Does it warm your cockles, HVAC? ----------- I'm a wordsmith. It's what I do. PS- Your use of 'cockles' may be construed in a pornographic manner. It's all a matter of POV
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-28 10:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c9a816e3-396d-41fa-b1b5-3ae9d099136e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #606831 |
On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 11:57:49 AM UTC-5, HVAC wrote: > Maple loops says >> > U2 sucks dead dog dick. You too > >> That's needlessly too graphic, mostly ugly. Does it warm your cockles, HVAC? > ----------- > > I'm a wordsmith. It's what I do. I'm kind of a writer/poet/tennisPlayer/... maybe we can exchange notes? Btw HVAC, where and when did you attend any university? Favourite subject? > PS- Your use of 'cockles' may be construed in a pornographic manner. Yeah. Sure. So what? Your kids sitting at your lap as you abuse Usenet? > It's all a matter of POV She's got a POV, he's got a POV, the dog's got a POV, even the puss(y)CAT! -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: Poet Pla(y)ing Tennis! Grasshopper Mode...”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-28 17:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583cacb6$0$34646$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #606831 |
On 11/28/2016 11:57 AM, HVAC wrote: > Maple loops says >> U2 sucks dead dog dick. You too > > That's needlessly too graphic, mostly ugly. Does it warm your cockles, HVAC? > ----------- > > I'm a wordsmith. It's what I do. > > PS- Your use of 'cockles' may be construed in a pornographic manner. > > It's all a matter of POV > Looperji, to HArdblow EVERYTHING is lewd.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web