Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #515846 > unrolled thread

Are there electrons that are different?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <dwuih2ht@djh3jg3ugh08.org> - 2015-08-22 20:28 +0000
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 20:34 +0000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 20:41 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 21:16 -0500
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:23 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:29 +0200
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:31 +0000
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:37 +0200
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-24 11:17 -0400
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 20:46 +0200
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 20:44 +0000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 20:54 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:11 -0500
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:22 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:29 -0500
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:33 +0000
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:35 -0500
                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:38 +0000
                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 17:00 -0700
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:11 -0400
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 23:54 -0400
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 23:41 +0000
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:28 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:17 +0200
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:25 +0000
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:40 +0000
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:51 +0200
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 17:03 +0000
                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:50 +0000
                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 14:07 -0500
                      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 19:10 +0000
                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 19:24 +0000
                      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 19:59 +0000
                        Re: Are there electrons that are different? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 13:12 -0700
                          Re: Are there electrons that are different? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:14 -0700
                            Re: Are there electrons that are different? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-26 10:51 -0700
                        Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 20:35 +0000
                          Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 15:54 +0000
                            Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:45 +0000
                              Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 19:08 +0000
                                Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 20:18 +0000
                                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 20:46 +0000
                                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 21:10 +0000
                                      Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 21:53 +0000
                                        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 21:58 +0000
                                          Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 23:45 +0000
                                        Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 23:43 +0000
                          Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 16:13 +0000
                            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-26 02:20 +0200
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-22 20:55 +0000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:02 +0000
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:08 -0500
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:11 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:13 -0500
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 23:43 +0000
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:43 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:29 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-23 01:54 +0200
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:47 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 17:35 +0200
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 15:51 +0000
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 09:05 -0700
                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:15 +0000
                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 10:20 -0700
                      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:56 +0000
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:08 +0200
                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:30 +0000
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 23:15 +0200
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:24 +0000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-23 06:44 +0200
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:55 +0200
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 11:18 +0200
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-22 21:24 +0000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:27 +0000
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-23 01:40 +0200
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-23 17:06 +1000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:53 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:55 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 19:27 +0200
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:44 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 19:25 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-24 16:18 -0400
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 20:40 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 22:20 +0200
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 12:53 -0400
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:54 +0000
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 16:53 -0700
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 06:23 -0400
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 09:11 -0500
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:18 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 17:24 +0200
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 10:40 -0500
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 17:55 +0200
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:18 +0000
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:32 +0200
                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:33 +0000
                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 21:59 +0200
                      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 20:06 +0000
                        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 22:06 +0200
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 12:02 -0400
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:09 +0000
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:16 +0200
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:37 +0000
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:50 +0200
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:46 +0000
                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 21:52 +0200
                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 20:03 +0000
                      Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 22:04 +0200
                        Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 20:21 +0000
                          Re: Are there electrons that are different? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 10:14 -0700
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-24 13:48 -0400

Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →

#516851

In sci.physics Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> wrote:
> jimp wrote:
> 
>>> Both variants are stupid. Which one is you, jimp?
>> 
>> Both variants have virtually eliminated people contracting tetanus in
>> the first world while the rest of the world dies at about a quarter
>> million a year, kook.
> 
> I disagree, jimp. You are an ignorant and know nothing about many things, 
> let alone Science.

Changing your name doesn't change the fact that you are a raving kook
and I could not care less that an idiot like you disagrees with me
about what can trivially be looked up, shit for brains.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516856

jimp wrote:

> In sci.physics Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> wrote:
>> jimp wrote:
>> 
>>>> Both variants are stupid. Which one is you, jimp?
>>> 
>>> Both variants have virtually eliminated people contracting tetanus in
>>> the first world while the rest of the world dies at about a quarter
>>> million a year, kook.
>> 
>> I disagree, jimp. You are an ignorant and know nothing about many
>> things,
>> let alone Science.
> 
> Changing your name doesn't change the fact that you are a raving kook
> and I could not care less that an idiot like you disagrees with me about
> what can trivially be looked up, shit for brains.

Read for instance this one here
http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/10/the-vaccine-hoax-is-over-freedom-of-information-act-documents-from-uk-reveal-30-years-of-coverup/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516865

In sci.physics Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> wrote:
> jimp wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> wrote:
>>> jimp wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> Both variants are stupid. Which one is you, jimp?
>>>> 
>>>> Both variants have virtually eliminated people contracting tetanus in
>>>> the first world while the rest of the world dies at about a quarter
>>>> million a year, kook.
>>> 
>>> I disagree, jimp. You are an ignorant and know nothing about many
>>> things,
>>> let alone Science.
>> 
>> Changing your name doesn't change the fact that you are a raving kook
>> and I could not care less that an idiot like you disagrees with me about
>> what can trivially be looked up, shit for brains.
> 
> Read for instance this one here
> http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/10/the-vaccine-hoax-is-over-freedom-of-information-act-documents-from-uk-reveal-30-years-of-coverup/

A kook news site, kook.

Try these, kook:
http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/tetanus/basics/definition/con-20021956
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetanus
http://www.medicinenet.com/tetanus/article.htm
https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/tetanus.html
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/tetanus/
http://www.vaccineinformation.org/tetanus/
http://pediatriceducation.org/2010/10/25/
http://www.smartvax.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=88:disease-risk-tetanus


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516873

jimp wrote:

>>> Changing your name doesn't change the fact that you are a raving kook
>>> and I could not care less that an idiot like you disagrees with me
>>> about what can trivially be looked up, shit for brains.
>> 
>> Read for instance this one here
>> http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/10/the-vaccine-hoax-is-over-freedom-of-information-act-documents-from-uk-reveal-30-years-of-coverup/
> 
> A kook news site, kook.

Read the references first, you batshit crazy idiot. 
Is this how your science works. Search for "gardasil victims" wherever
you may find appropriated, ie, but not mandatory
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/dec/31/us-court-pays-6-million-gardasil-victims/?page=all

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516875

Margarita Cibulkova wrote:

> jimp wrote:
> 
>>>> Changing your name doesn't change the fact that you are a raving kook
>>>> and I could not care less that an idiot like you disagrees with me
>>>> about what can trivially be looked up, shit for brains.
>>> 
>>> Read for instance this one here
>>> http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/10/the-vaccine-hoax-is-over-freedom-of-
information-act-documents-from-uk-reveal-30-years-of-coverup/
>> 
>> A kook news site, kook.
> 
> Read the references first, you batshit crazy idiot. 
> Is this how your science works. Search for "gardasil victims" wherever
> you may find appropriated, ie, but not mandatory
> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/dec/31/us-court-pays-6-million-
gardasil-victims/?page=all

"Not only are there questions about the safety of the vaccine, there are 
questions about the need for the vaccine. Over 90 percent of women 
infected with HPV clear the infection naturally within two years, at which 
point cervical cells go back to normal."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516900

In sci.physics Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> wrote:
> Margarita Cibulkova wrote:

<snip crap about something eles>

Nothing left.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516899

In sci.physics Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> wrote:

<snip raving kook babble>

Nothing left.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516786

jimp wrote:

> In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote:
>> */jimp/* wrote:
>> 
>>>>>> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your
>>>>>> face,
>>>>>> which looks stupid.
>>>>> 
>>>>> That is just gibberish, kook.
>>>>> Are you trying to say this no longer happens, kook?
>>>> 
>>>> So we agree that those shots are short time/period delimited, and you
>>>> get it AFTER the injury already happened. How smart is that? Can you
>>>> follow me?
>>> 
>>> If you want to call 10 years "a short time", babbling kook.
>>> 
>>> You get it after an injury IF you haven't been vaccinated within the
>>> last 10 years, thus being at risk for tetanus, babbling kook.
>>> 
>>> You are just another ignorant, bat shit crazy babbler.
>> 
>> It must be your face than, you are so bleep stupid. They give you those
>> unnecessary shots just to make sure. Even know you got one yesterday.
>> 
>> Btw, "kook" comes from the urban dictionary. You are very urban, no
>> doubts about that. Stop posting in a science group, go be urban
>> somewhere else.
> 
> Seek help from a mental health professional, you babbling kook. Learn
> how to compose a coherent sentence in English, you illiterate twit.

Sick turd loosing the argument, trolling now by attacking his English. One
more chance batshit. You either

1. Get your worthless vaccines every 8 years for no reason.

Or

2. You get your toe bad infected/injured, then later get your anti-tetanus
vaccine.

Both variants are stupid. Which one is you, jimp?

Now watch the jimp vaporize.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516905

Margarita Cibulkova wrote:

> jimp wrote:
>> In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote:
>>> […]
>> […]
> 
> Sick turd loosing the argument, trolling now by attacking his English. […]
            ^^^^^^^                                         ^^^

ROTFL.  Do you really think that we are this stupid that we do not realize 
that *you* are "he"?  Not everyone is as stupid as you, ’nym-shifting troll.


PointedEars
-- 
“Science is empirical: knowing the answer means nothing;
 testing your knowledge means everything.”
   —Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, theoretical physicist,
    in “A Universe from Nothing” (2009)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515855

On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 20:28:44 +0000, James Birdy wrote:

> I mean, only humans are using shoes
>

That's not true.

Virtually all animals with legs also have "shoes" and these
shoes are quite comparable to the artificial foot coverings
of humans.

All mammals, for example, are either hoofed or possess heavily
keratinized foot pads, and keratin is tougher than leather.

The "shoes" of insects are a continuation of the chitinous
exoskeleton.

Also, if a human were to go barefoot, the soles of his feet
would soon develop a much thicker keratin layer, similar to
a callous, that would serve as very effective "shoes."

So, your basic hypothesis is full of idiotic shit and so too
are your brains.

Get the fuck outa here.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515859

*/Fabian Russell/* wrote:

> On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 20:28:44 +0000, James Birdy wrote:
> 
>> I mean, only humans are using shoes
>>
> That's not true.
> Virtually all animals with legs also have "shoes" and these shoes are
> quite comparable to the artificial foot coverings of humans.

You must be an idiot. That "foot covering" is not a so strong insulator as 
the Artificial Plastic from your shoes. The natural are more or less 
conductive, adapted to the amount of electrons necessary. Remember those 
animals are staying like that 24/7/365. 

Go out and buy yourself a brain, ignorant idiot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515863

On 8/22/15 3:28 PM, James Birdy wrote:
> As I understood, electrically, the insulator of the shoes taken away,
> the electrons from Earth are getting up into your system.

   You get a lot more electron into "your system" when the humidity is
   low in winter and you get zapped touching animals and door knobs.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515865

*/Sam Wormley/* wrote:

> On 8/22/15 3:28 PM, James Birdy wrote:
>> As I understood, electrically, the insulator of the shoes taken away,
>> the electrons from Earth are getting up into your system.
> 
>    You get a lot more electron into "your system" when the humidity is
>    low in winter and you get zapped touching animals and door knobs.

You can't, wearing your thick insulator shows, as being at same potential.

I was talking about Ground Electrons, not electrostatics, which may be the 
subject for another discussion.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515868

On 8/22/15 4:11 PM, James Birdy wrote:
> I was talking about Ground Electrons

   No different than any other electrons -- get you flu shot.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515907

In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote:
> */Sam Wormley/* wrote:
> 
>> On 8/22/15 3:28 PM, James Birdy wrote:
>>> As I understood, electrically, the insulator of the shoes taken away,
>>> the electrons from Earth are getting up into your system.
>> 
>>    You get a lot more electron into "your system" when the humidity is
>>    low in winter and you get zapped touching animals and door knobs.
> 
> You can't, wearing your thick insulator shows, as being at same potential.
> 
> I was talking about Ground Electrons, not electrostatics, which may be the 
> subject for another discussion.

There is no such thing as "Ground Electrons", you babbling kook.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516443

*/jimp/* wrote:

> In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote:
>> */Sam Wormley/* wrote:
>> 
>>> On 8/22/15 3:28 PM, James Birdy wrote:
>>>> As I understood, electrically, the insulator of the shoes taken away,
>>>> the electrons from Earth are getting up into your system.
>>> 
>>>    You get a lot more electron into "your system" when the humidity is
>>>    low in winter and you get zapped touching animals and door knobs.
>> 
>> You can't, wearing your thick insulator shows, as being at same
>> potential.
>> 
>> I was talking about Ground Electrons, not electrostatics, which may be
>> the subject for another discussion.
> 
> There is no such thing as "Ground Electrons", you babbling kook.

As they are passing through your body from ground up through your feet, it 
does, you ignorant sack of bleep. That's the whole idea with Ground(s) in 
among others, Electrics an Electronics. They pass Electrons. lol. This is 
how it works. Not my fault you have no necessary prerequisites.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516497

In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote:
> */jimp/* wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote:
>>> */Sam Wormley/* wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 8/22/15 3:28 PM, James Birdy wrote:
>>>>> As I understood, electrically, the insulator of the shoes taken away,
>>>>> the electrons from Earth are getting up into your system.
>>>> 
>>>>    You get a lot more electron into "your system" when the humidity is
>>>>    low in winter and you get zapped touching animals and door knobs.
>>> 
>>> You can't, wearing your thick insulator shows, as being at same
>>> potential.
>>> 
>>> I was talking about Ground Electrons, not electrostatics, which may be
>>> the subject for another discussion.
>> 
>> There is no such thing as "Ground Electrons", you babbling kook.
> 
> As they are passing through your body from ground up through your feet, it 
> does, you ignorant sack of bleep. That's the whole idea with Ground(s) in 
> among others, Electrics an Electronics. They pass Electrons. lol. This is 
> how it works. Not my fault you have no necessary prerequisites.

You are batshit crazy.

One of the first signs that one is dealing with a bat shit crazy kook
is they capitalize things that should not be capitalized such as
"electrons", you babbling kook.



-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515911

James Birdy amok-crossposted:

> */Sam Wormley/* wrote:
>> On 8/22/15 3:28 PM, James Birdy wrote:
>>> As I understood, electrically, the insulator of the shoes taken away,
>>> the electrons from Earth are getting up into your system.
>> 
>>    You get a lot more electron into "your system" when the humidity is
>>    low in winter and you get zapped touching animals and door knobs.
> 
> You can't, wearing your thick insulator shows, as being at same potential.

You have it backwards.  It is the soles of shoes that continuously cause 
friction, and thereby static electricity (separation of charges) in the 
first place.  It is the insulating rubber that prevents immediate electric 
discharge (balancing of charges), so the static electricity builds up (in 
the body).  It is the non-insulating hand that allows electrical discharge, 
the flow of electrons from the animals and door knobs to your body because 
there have not been enough there.
 
> I was talking about Ground Electrons, not electrostatics, […]

Which shows that you have no clue what you are talking about.

Not surprising for a 'nym-shifting troll, though.


PointedEars
-- 
“Science is empirical: knowing the answer means nothing;
 testing your knowledge means everything.”
   —Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, theoretical physicist,
    in “A Universe from Nothing” (2009)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516445

*/Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn/* wrote:

> James Birdy amok-crossposted:
> 
>> */Sam Wormley/* wrote:
>>> On 8/22/15 3:28 PM, James Birdy wrote:
>>>> As I understood, electrically, the insulator of the shoes taken away,
>>>> the electrons from Earth are getting up into your system.
>>> 
>>>    You get a lot more electron into "your system" when the humidity is
>>>    low in winter and you get zapped touching animals and door knobs.
>> 
>> You can't, wearing your thick insulator shows, as being at same
>> potential.
> 
> You have it backwards.  It is the soles of shoes that continuously cause
> friction, and thereby static electricity (separation of charges) in the
> first place.  It is the insulating rubber that prevents immediate
> electric discharge (balancing of charges), so the static electricity
> builds up (in the body).  It is the non-insulating hand that allows
> electrical discharge,

That's exactly what is been said, conehead. I see no difference. Read the 
post of Poutnik, which is educating you.

> the flow of electrons from the animals and door knobs to your body
> because there have not been enough there.

!!
 
>> I was talking about Ground Electrons, not electrostatics, […]
> 
> Which shows that you have no clue what you are talking about.

What the bleep, you are a conehead with pointedears.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516464

The ’nym-shifting troll posting as "James Birdy" amok-crossposted:

> */Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn/* wrote:
>> James Birdy amok-crossposted:
>>> */Sam Wormley/* wrote:
>>>>    You get a lot more electron into "your system" when the humidity is
>>>>    low in winter and you get zapped touching animals and door knobs.
>>> You can't, wearing your thick insulator shows, as being at same
>>> potential.
>> 
>> You have it backwards.  It is the soles of shoes that continuously cause
>> friction, and thereby static electricity (separation of charges) in the
>> first place.  It is the insulating rubber that prevents immediate
>> electric discharge (balancing of charges), so the static electricity
>> builds up (in the body).  It is the non-insulating hand that allows
>> electrical discharge,
> 
> That's exactly what is been said,

Not by you.  You *denied* that one would “get a lot more electron into "your 
system"” by getting “zapped touching animals and door knobs” (under said 
conditions).  Because you replied to that claim: “you can’t, wearing your 
thick insulator shoes” and blathered something about “same potential” (which 
is the opposite of what is happening: if the potential were the same, there 
would not be a build-up of static electricity *with* rubber 
shoes; *insulating* rubber shoes are used *in the laboratory*, for a quite 
*different* purpose – you are confusing the facts).

So yes, you *can*, and you were *wrong*.  It is possible (though unlikely, 
given your history here) that you denied the claim because you did not 
understand what was being claimed (I have already told you that you have an 
abysmally low understanding of English and physics), but that does not make 
your denial disappear.


PointedEars
-- 
“Science is empirical: knowing the answer means nothing;
 testing your knowledge means everything.”
   —Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, theoretical physicist,
    in “A Universe from Nothing” (2009)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web