Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #516417 > unrolled thread

The US has been caught lying about radiation before too

Started by"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
First post2015-08-24 08:38 -0500
Last post2015-08-24 16:42 +0000
Articles 8 on this page of 148 — 18 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:38 -0500
    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 15:54 +0200
      Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:15 -0500
        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:23 +0200
          Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:37 -0500
            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 09:43 -0500
              Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:57 -0500
                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:51 -0500
                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:12 +0100
            re, nah noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:39 -0700
        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 09:34 -0500
          Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:53 -0500
            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:55 -0500
              Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 09:52 -0400
                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 15:30 +0100
                  Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 09:59 -0500
                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 10:36 -0500
                      Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 15:41 -0400
                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:50 +0000
                      Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 15:50 -0400
                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 20:21 +0000
                          Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:46 -0500
                            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 23:46 +0000
                              Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:24 -0400
                            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:55 +0200
                          Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:22 -0400
                            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:11 +0000
                              Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:35 -0400
                                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 17:10 -0500
                                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:13 +0000
                                  Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (Jim need more help) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 17:31 -0500
                                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (Jim need more help) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 23:02 +0000
                                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (Jim need more help) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:32 -0500
                                    say dUh; thankyoiu noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 21:09 -0700
                                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-26 18:30 -0400
                              Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 17:27 -0500
                                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:55 +0000
                                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:33 -0500
                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:19 -0500
                          Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:28 -0400
                            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:25 +0000
                              Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:24 -0500
                          Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 09:00 -0500
                            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:28 +0000
                            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:34 -0500
                            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:27 -0500
                            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-27 20:23 +0100
                              Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:29 -0500
                                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-27 21:50 +0100
                                  Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:02 -0500
                                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:25 +0000
                                      Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-28 11:39 +0000
                                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 12:06 -0400
                                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:05 +0000
                                          Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (iimp is a complete idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 16:49 -0500
                                            Re: Rocky is still batshit crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 22:39 +0000
                                            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a complete idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:31 -0500
                                            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 22:45 -0500
                                              Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a joke) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 08:29 +0200
                                              Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:12 -0500
                                                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (K proves she is an asshole) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 09:12 -0500
                                                  Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (K proves she is an asshole) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:44 -0500
                                              Re: Rocky's latest delusion jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 05:53 +0000
                                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-28 02:35 +0000
                                      Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 10:09 -0500
                                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-28 15:51 +0000
                                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:09 +0000
                                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:06 +0100
                                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:11 -0500
                                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:05 +0100
                                      Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:41 -0500
                                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 22:01 +0100
                                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 16:13 -0500
                                  Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:32 +0000
                                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:12 +0000
                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 20:51 +0100
                      Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:35 -0500
                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 21:58 +0000
                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 23:12 +0100
                          Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too  gilber34 distroys links "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 17:25 -0500
                            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 distroys links Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 23:52 +0100
                            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 distroys links gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 22:33 -0500
                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:28 +0200
                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:19 -0500
                  Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 11:08 -0400
                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:53 +0000
                      Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:34 -0400
                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 08:50 -0500
                          Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:31 +0000
                          Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:35 -0500
                          Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:25 -0500
                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:30 +0000
                          hah, may be not noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:13 -0700
                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:24 -0500
                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 12:39 -0500
                      Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:42 -0400
                  Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 10:19 -0500
                    two noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:29 -0700
                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 20:51 +0100
                      Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:49 -0400
                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-26 22:03 +0100
                          Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 17:41 -0400
                            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 22:03 +0000
                              Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Reginald Ehrett <chasi@competence.org> - 2015-08-29 22:25 +0000
                                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 22:35 +0000
                                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 20:25 -0500
                                  Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:24 +0000
                                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Reginald Ehrett <chasi@competence.org> - 2015-08-30 10:31 +0000
                              Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dumptrucks full of M291 resin) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 18:30 -0500
                                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dumptrucks full of M291 resin) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:26 +0000
                            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 23:20 +0100
                            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 18:42 -0500
                              Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:27 +0000
                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:26 -0500
                  Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:20 -0400
                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 09:40 -0500
                  Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:55 +0000
                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 10:17 -0700
                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 11:01 -0400
                      Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:39 +0000
                  Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 20:50 +0100
                  Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 22:38 -0500
                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:48 +0000
                Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:58 -0400
                  Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:07 -0500
                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:59 -0500
                      Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 22:40 -0500
                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 00:27 -0400
                      Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:50 -0400
                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:31 -0500
                          Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 11:31 -0400
                            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 11:35 -0500
                              Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 12:49 -0400
                          Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:07 -0400
                      Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 10:00 -0500
                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:11 -0400
                        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:39 +0000
                    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:47 -0400
            Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
      Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-24 10:23 -0400
        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:12 -0500
          Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-24 13:41 -0400
    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 09:17 -0500
      Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:44 -0500
        Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:56 -0500
    Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:42 +0000

Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]


#516615

FromTony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com>
Date2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Message-ID<mrg17o$llc$7@dont-email.me>
In reply to#516426
On 24/08/2015 15:15, Rocky wrote:
> "Poutnik" <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:mrf7ji$6ri$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 08/24/2015 03:38 PM, Rocky wrote:
>>
>>> "If nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years, how did Hiroshima and
>>> Nagasaki
>>> recover so quickly?"
>>>
>>
>> If you knew more about radioactive decay of fission products,
>> you would not need to ask such a question.
>>
>> As Hiroshima and Nagasaki could recover so quickly,
>> even if nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years.
>>
>> As the products vary very much in their half time,
>> so activity drops fast initially,
>> until short time product decay.
>>
>> Also, amount of fission material
>> was about 4 orders lower than for nuclear plant.
>>
>> --
>> Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )
>>
>> Knowledge makes great people humble,
>> but small people arrogant.
>
> FYI you hijacked this thread, but I forgive you because I can add to this
> thread that the EPA also lied about the air quality at Nuke York City's
> Ground Zero
>

You made the initial post, you were answered.
Just because the answer does not agree with your ideas does not mean the 
thread was hijacked.

> BTW in reality this thread was dealing with the fact that the US has lied
> about radiation before so why shouldn't they lie about the radiation at Nuke
> York City's Ground Zero also?
>
> And I've already got a thread that proves NIST used lie after lie after lie
> in their "Hypothetical" "Collapse Initiation" of the Twin Towers.
>
> So if 9/11 was not an inside job that could have gone so far as to use CGIs
> and nukes in Nuke York City then why are there so many outright lies about
> Ground Zero?
>
> Oh, you want to see evidence of a CGI in Nuke York City?  OK.  And to this
> date the only person that could recreate the exact same thing the CGI did in
> Nuke York City used 3D software and programmed the 3D image to reflect the
> sky.
>
> 9/11 PLANE WING DISAPPEARS AS IT HITS TRADE CENTER TOWER! CGI HOLOGRAM?
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL_x9NsxJlg
>
> And there just happens to be a lot of videos of the alleged Flight 175 with
> a disappearing wing or wings that show up in front of closer objects.
>
> As for Nukes in Nuke York City?  Well that is in other threads.
>
> Now a link showing the EPA has done their part about adding to the multitude
> of lies about Ground Zero.
>   http://www.ucsusa.org/our-work/center-science-and-democracy/promoting-scientific-integrity/ground-zero-air-pollution.html
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#516433

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2015-08-24 10:23 -0400
Message-ID<mrf99i$epr$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#516420

Poutnik wrote:
> On 08/24/2015 03:38 PM, Rocky wrote:
>
>> "If nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years, how did Hiroshima and
>> Nagasaki recover so quickly?"
>>
>
> If you knew more about radioactive decay of fission products,
> you would not need to ask such a question.
>
> As Hiroshima and Nagasaki could recover so quickly,
> even if nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years.
>
> As the products vary very much in their half time,
> so activity drops fast initially,
> until short time product decay.
>
> Also, amount of fission material
> was about 4 orders lower than for nuclear plant.





Did you ever notice that the government has increased the amount of 
radiation they say is still safe, especially after chernobyl.
So, It's just a silly coincidence that more people are dying of cancer than 
ever before. huh ?

Eat your frankenfood GMO's, and the prescription drugs that later turn up on 
TV ad's from lawyers offering to help you if you died from the side effects 
.....and don't worry as the government is protecting you from all the 
boogie-men.


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#516452

Fromgilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2015-08-24 10:12 -0500
Message-ID<mrfc9n$dpi$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#516433
On 8/24/2015 9:23 AM, Bast wrote:
> Poutnik wrote:
>> On 08/24/2015 03:38 PM, Rocky wrote:
>>
>>> "If nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years, how did Hiroshima and
>>> Nagasaki recover so quickly?"

>>
>> If you knew more about radioactive decay of fission products,
>> you would not need to ask such a question.
>>
>> As Hiroshima and Nagasaki could recover so quickly,
>> even if nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years.

>> As the products vary very much in their half time,
>> so activity drops fast initially,
>> until short time product decay.
>>
>> Also, amount of fission material
>> was about 4 orders lower than for nuclear plant.
>
>
>
>
> Did you ever notice that the government has increased the amount of
> radiation they say is still safe, especially after chernobyl.
> So, It's just a silly coincidence that more people are dying of cancer than
> ever before. huh ?
>
> Eat your frankenfood GMO's, and the prescription drugs that later turn up on
> TV ad's from lawyers offering to help you if you died from the side effects
> .....and don't worry as the government is protecting you from all the
> boogie-men.
>

remember Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel ? The Death Doctor?
  Brother of Rob Emanuel, Obama's White House Cheif of Staff ?

He was on PBS recomending that people self terminate at the age of 65, 
and he was going to do that too.  I was watching it, when he said it, 
what an asshole

he says 75 here, but he said 65 on PBS;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ezekiel_Emanuel
Although Emanuel opposes legalized euthanasia, he believes that after 
age 75 life is not worth living, and the pursuit of longevity, not a 
worthwhile goal for U.S. health care policy.[69] This is refuted by 
neurosurgeon and medical ethicist Miguel Faria, who in two articles in 
Surgical Neurology International claims that healthy lifestyles and 
brain plasticity can lead to the postponement of senescence and lead to 
happiness even as we age.[70][71]

all to lighten the GOV medicade/medicare/socialsecurity burdons, that 
you paid money into already



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#516533

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2015-08-24 13:41 -0400
Message-ID<mrfkt0$5ps$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#516452

gilber34 wrote:
> On 8/24/2015 9:23 AM, Bast wrote:
>> Poutnik wrote:
>>> On 08/24/2015 03:38 PM, Rocky wrote:
>>>
>>>> "If nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years, how did Hiroshima and
>>>> Nagasaki recover so quickly?"
>
>>>
>>> If you knew more about radioactive decay of fission products,
>>> you would not need to ask such a question.
>>>
>>> As Hiroshima and Nagasaki could recover so quickly,
>>> even if nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years.
>
>>> As the products vary very much in their half time,
>>> so activity drops fast initially,
>>> until short time product decay.
>>>
>>> Also, amount of fission material
>>> was about 4 orders lower than for nuclear plant.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Did you ever notice that the government has increased the amount of
>> radiation they say is still safe, especially after chernobyl.
>> So, It's just a silly coincidence that more people are dying of cancer
>> than ever before. huh ?
>>
>> Eat your frankenfood GMO's, and the prescription drugs that later turn
>> up on TV ad's from lawyers offering to help you if you died from the
>> side effects .....and don't worry as the government is protecting you
>> from all the boogie-men.
>>
>
> remember Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel ? The Death Doctor?
>  Brother of Rob Emanuel, Obama's White House Cheif of Staff ?
>
> He was on PBS recomending that people self terminate at the age of 65,
> and he was going to do that too.  I was watching it, when he said it,
> what an asshole
>
> he says 75 here, but he said 65 on PBS;
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ezekiel_Emanuel
> Although Emanuel opposes legalized euthanasia, he believes that after
> age 75 life is not worth living, and the pursuit of longevity, not a
> worthwhile goal for U.S. health care policy.[69] This is refuted by
> neurosurgeon and medical ethicist Miguel Faria, who in two articles in
> Surgical Neurology International claims that healthy lifestyles and
> brain plasticity can lead to the postponement of senescence and lead to
> happiness even as we age.[70][71]
>
> all to lighten the GOV medicade/medicare/socialsecurity burdons, that
> you paid money into already




Well DUH.
People who pay the premiums all their life, and then have the nerve to live 
on for decades and suck that money out.
That really kills the profits.

"Soilent Green" is not that far away.
Monsanto just has to get the packaging right. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#516428

Fromgilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2015-08-24 09:17 -0500
Message-ID<mrf918$52e$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#516417
On 8/24/2015 8:38 AM, Rocky wrote:
> To make a long story short, if the US could lie about the Radiation at
> Hiroshima

the US did not lie, they wrote many books on it, one of the best is " 
effects of nuclear weapons" and is based upon Japan, also has chapters 
from Japan.

this is now free, the pdf is here, go read it.

  Dolan The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, Third Edition
[Search domain www.princeton.edu]

princeton.edu/~aglaser/lecture2007_weaponeffects.pdf


  ==> Rocky. the flying Squirrelie is a liar.


>
> From:
> "If nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years, how did Hiroshima and Nagasaki
> recover so quickly?"

they are still radioactive dude.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#516444

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-08-24 09:44 -0500
Message-ID<k8OdnVUpet5vsEbInZ2dnUU7-Q2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#516428
"gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message 
news:mrf918$52e$1@speranza.aioe.org...
> On 8/24/2015 8:38 AM, Rocky wrote:
>> To make a long story short, if the US could lie about the Radiation at
>> Hiroshima
>
> the US did not lie, they wrote many books on it, one of the best is " 
> effects of nuclear weapons" and is based upon Japan, also has chapters 
> from Japan.
>
> this is now free, the pdf is here, go read it.
>
>  Dolan The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, Third Edition
> [Search domain www.princeton.edu]
>
> princeton.edu/~aglaser/lecture2007_weaponeffects.pdf

Obviously they changed their tune after being caught in a big lie.

Too bad the EPA never apologized for their lies about the air quality at 
Nuke York City's Ground Zero and NIST never apologized for all the total 
bullshit they used in there "Hypothetical" "Collapse Initiation" that cost 
the taxpayers millions.

And why are you so willing to stand behind NIST when there is only one thing 
in this world that could leave "Surviving Corners" to both the Twin Towers 
with very little debris in the area from two 110 story buildings at the 
exact same time.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

As for the lie after lie after lie from NIST that cost the taxpayers 
millions.  See:

The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is:
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#516473

Fromgilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2015-08-24 10:56 -0500
Message-ID<mrfes8$kb4$2@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#516444
On 8/24/2015 9:44 AM, Rocky wrote:
> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
> news:mrf918$52e$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>> On 8/24/2015 8:38 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>> To make a long story short, if the US could lie about the Radiation at
>>> Hiroshima
>>
>> the US did not lie, they wrote many books on it, one of the best is "
>> effects of nuclear weapons" and is based upon Japan, also has chapters
>> from Japan.
>>
>> this is now free, the pdf is here, go read it.
>>
>>   Dolan The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, Third Edition
>> [Search domain www.princeton.edu]
>>
>> princeton.edu/~aglaser/lecture2007_weaponeffects.pdf
>
> Obviously they changed their tune after being caught in a big lie.
>

you are getting canned for not responding to topic.

<snip crap>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#516508

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-08-24 16:42 +0000
Message-ID<04urac-9ib.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#516417
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> To make a long story short, if the US could lie about the Radiation at 
> Hiroshima why couldn't they lie about the radiation at Nuke York City's 
> Ground Zero for the exact same reason?
> 
> From:
> "If nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years, how did Hiroshima and Nagasaki 
> recover so quickly?"

Because very little fallout lasts for more than a few months, ignorant
kook.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic
signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any
seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers
as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected
by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the
Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events.

A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a
fact that is widely known and trivial to verify.

Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it
has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data.

Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available
on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources.

Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any
governmental agency.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html

<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web