Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #551777 > unrolled thread

Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 11:47 -0800
    Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 15:23 -0800
      Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-02 08:50 -0800
      Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 08:57 -0800
        Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 09:17 -0800
          Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-02 17:47 +0000
            Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 10:10 -0800
              23 zeroes in base_ten? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 10:44 -0800
              Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 12:49 -0600
                Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 11:02 -0800
                  Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 13:19 -0600
                  Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-02 19:22 +0000
                    Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 11:54 -0800
                      Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-02 20:15 +0000
                        Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 12:40 -0800
                          Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-02 23:46 +0000
                            Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 15:51 -0800
                              Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 00:10 +0000
                                Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:21 -0800
                                  Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 00:46 +0000
                                    Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 08:53 -0800
                                      Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 10:47 -0800
                                        Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 11:16 -0800
                                          Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-03-04 14:04 -0800
                                            Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 14:11 -0800
                                              Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 22:34 +0000
                                                Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 15:00 -0800
                                                  Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 23:07 +0000
                                                    Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 15:29 -0800
                                                      Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 15:51 -0800
                                                        Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 15:54 -0800
                                                      Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 00:22 +0000
                                                        Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 16:43 -0800
                                                          Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 00:52 +0000
                                                            Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 18:03 -0800
                                                              Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 03:24 +0000
                                                              Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 19:32 -0800
                                            cc = 1/em noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 14:14 -0800
              Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-02 19:21 +0000
        Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 17:03 -0500

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#551777 — Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection

On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 11:43:02 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/04/30/how-plasma-connects-the-sun-to-the-climate/
> 
> It's recently been recognised that the atmosphere below the ionosphere is also a weak plasma due to the ionisation caused primarily by cosmic rays. So it's plasma all the way down! The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun; even the air we breathe is all part of the same system.
> 
> 
> http://www.sis-group.org.uk/event/2015-04-25/2015-spring-meeting-agm.htm
> 
> Bob discusses the variability of the Sun and stars of a similar type. He looks at the Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Coupling mechanism by which events on the Sun directly influence the Earth's magnetopause, ionosphere and lower atmosphere.
> 
> Text and slides available to read here.    High quality version here.
> 
> Also viewable on Youtube, under the title "Our Variable Sun and Climate Change".

When its lit up with lightning  TreBert

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#558461

On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 11:47:16 AM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 11:43:02 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> > http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/04/30/how-plasma-connects-the-sun-to-the-climate/
> > 
> > It's recently been recognised that the atmosphere below the ionosphere is also a weak plasma due to the ionisation caused primarily by cosmic rays. So it's plasma all the way down! The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun; even the air we breathe is all part of the same system.
> > 
> > 
> > http://www.sis-group.org.uk/event/2015-04-25/2015-spring-meeting-agm.htm
> > 
> > Bob discusses the variability of the Sun and stars of a similar type. He looks at the Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Coupling mechanism by which events on the Sun directly influence the Earth's magnetopause, ionosphere and lower atmosphere.
> > 
> > Text and slides available to read here.    High quality version here.
> > 
> > Also viewable on Youtube, under the title "Our Variable Sun and Climate Change".
> 
> When its lit up with lightning  TreBert

A bit of plasma could be found everywhere.Reason is its so common.Its star stuff.Core stuff.It fits well with electrons.that says it all. Trebert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558594

<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> "reber g=emc^2" Full-Swine wrote:
"that says it all" which can be seen as soon as
<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> "reber g=emc^2"  :B::ert Glazier, 
the Hate monger, introduces himself with/as
>
:B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex &
:B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.."
:B:: "My Grandfathers had tails". -- Trebert
:B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert.
:B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew. I'm the only Jew that
:B:: got 2 form letters from two Popes". Bert
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
:B:: "I'll be sitting on Benj's, Saul Levi's & HVAC's face
:B:: to take a shit & say: "Open your mouth wide".
:B:: "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And laugh".
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>
:B:: "I'm M&M's Clueless Fuck-faced turd".Bert.
:B:: I'm "Siegman Fraud", "Bert, the Bowel Movement".
:B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world"
:B:: "Israel will drop its first H-bomb 'David' ". TreBert
:B:: __"I'm glad when war breaks out"__ Bert
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
:B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and
:B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. "....
:B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur, carbon & iron together
:B:: to make gun powder" ... & "while I was in custody
:B:: of Osceola Sheriff Bob Hansel, for thieving, his
:B:: deputies beat the shit out of me. So I bought a
:B:: 357 magnum for death threats by Sheriff Bob.
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
about which ....
Moderator General "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> aka
"Richard A." aka Harlow Campbell wrote:
>
"Bert, Seriously. You are the stupidest cocksucking
moron who ever came down the Mass Pike.
"Bert, you really are a pathetic excuse for a human
fucking being". "Bert is a racist. (And he's stupid too)"
"TreBert, you are one stupid cocksucker".
"Bert, does your stupidity know no bounds?"
"Bert, are the stupidest cocksucker on the planet."
"Spin THIS, Glazier, you fucking idiot." "Bert get
some spelling lessons, you feeble-minded fuck".
"Bert, your opinion doesn't count"
"Bert you are an idiot."
"Bert, you are a clueless cocksucker .... and "Bert
you are senile, dazed & confused. Fucked in the head.
"a trained cockroach is smarter than Bert"
"Bert, you should be arrested"
"Bert, I will call the police and tell them that your
van seems to be a center for drug activity in the
Wal-Mart parking lot".... .... about which....
 >
Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
Glazier, your brain is entangles with a used garbage can.
Glazier, "Its a shame" that your science is far worse
than the man's on the street.
Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage.
reber, take your you know it all thinking to your grave .
reber, your horseshit gets old.Say hi to Allah for me.
reber, you don't believe in science.
Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup.
Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__.
Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!..
 >
Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
Glazier, you are a spamming piece of shit...
Your Cocaine usage explains a lot of your posts.
You are drunk again. Give up and kill yourself.
 >
Astrophysicist "Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote:
GLAZIER YOU ARE A LAMEbrain PIECE OF SHIT!
Saul Levy
 >
Rocket Scientist Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
Glazier, you are babbling desperately. Is it sympathy
or pity you're grasping for? Stop it, either way.
 >
benj" <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
One only has to read Glazier's posts to see when Bert was lobotomized.
But Herb found poster "Double-A" who likes to be like Glazier,
but "Alkie-Alkie" is another kook who is as dumb as Bert is!
Now they party and frolic!...still waiting "to be loved by all"...
 >
hanson wrote:
So Glazier, given your Jewish Superiority complex and
your IQ of 122 and you knowing how how everything works,
... how come ended up shitting into a bucket in a 25 year
old van that you use as your residence on Wal-Mart's
Parking Lot? ..... .... What went wrong, Glazier?
 >
Now, Glazier consider "what will the say when Glazier dies?
Are they gonna say he was a kind man? He was a wise man?
He had plans? He has wisdom? .... BULLSHIT, MAN!"...
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TAixFYnDh4> [D]
BULLSHIT,... because Swine Glazier DOES have plans
which Glazier, the Swine, announced and posted at the
ripe age of eighty (80) when Glazier became a criminal
Graveyard Vandal who wrote:
 >
(1)
On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in:
https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J
Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh
when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert.
 >
Glazier's geriatric decay worsened, along with Glazier's chronic
alcoholism and Glazier, the Olde Kacker, became a Coprophile
IOW Glazier became a filthy Face Shitter at his age of 86, which
Glazier proudly announced & posted...
 >
(2)
On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, Jew-Swine Glazier
said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>:
Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser.
For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser.
Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after which...
 >
Glazier, the Criminal Graveyard Vandal & Face Shitter got even
worse over the next year and at Glazier's age of 87, Glazier
widened his piggish Face-shitting habit, as seen when Glazier
threatened...
 >
(3)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, as Swine Glazier wrote:
Harlow HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>: "I'll be sitting on your face
to take a shit & say: "Open wide". Trebert.
 >
(4)
The Criminal Swine Glazier refused to stop his practices & rejected
to be taken down, because Glazier at his age of 87+, Swine Glazier
labeled himself as "Siegman Fraud" which is synonym with "Bowel-
movement, actually saying that __ "Glazier is a piece of shit"__.
who, to boot, also announced that Glazier is a Transvestite who dons
female dresses and a Sarah Palin mask, saying that he has "nice
legs"...
 >
hanson wrote:
Now Glazier, since you are a curse and an embarrassment, day-in
and day-out, to every Jew everywhere, has it dawned on you
sorry, geriatric Transie-Swine, that as soon as you have been
"put away and under" Google will remove ALL YOUR posts from
the USENET and the only thing that will remain and show your
legacy, is because:
 >
Glazier the Swine fortunately posted:
.... "hanson made me famous"....
 >
hanson wrote
So, Glazier you swine you should be grateful to me & not wish
me ill like you did above, in your sick hate mongering, since
it is only because of hanson, that Web searches show for:
>
--- Swine Glazier G=EMC^2 Cretin ----            27'833 hits & rising
--- reber g=emc^2 Face-shitter & Vandal ----   27'953 hits & rising
>
cuz of hanson's caring and loving administering badly needed
<http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> to the mental
cripple aka <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier>. ... Shalom 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558595

A bit of plasma could be found everywhere
----------

No

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558601

On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 8:57:48 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote:
> A bit of plasma could be found everywhere
> ----------
> 
> No

Actually, he's right.  Our atmosphere is a slight plasma.  And when water is mixed in it becomes even stronger, due to water's surface tension.

Plasma's are more common than people generally assume

Watch this video:
Alternative to Spiritualistic Thinking in the Atmospheric Sciences  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dexlOvP7mPw

This is very advanced so don't try to takt it all in at one time.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558613

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 8:57:48 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote:
>> A bit of plasma could be found everywhere
>> ----------
>> 
>> No
> 
> Actually, he's right.  Our atmosphere is a slight plasma.  And when water
> is mixed in it becomes even stronger, due to water's surface tension.

Nope, you don't understand what a plasma is.

> Plasma's are more common than people generally assume

In space, but not in the Earth's atmosphere.

> Alternative to Spiritualistic Thinking in the Atmospheric Sciences  
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dexlOvP7mPw
> 
> This is very advanced so don't try to takt it all in at one time.

It is nonsense.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558618

On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 10:01:06 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

> > Actually, he's right.  Our atmosphere is a slight plasma.  And when water
> > is mixed in it becomes even stronger, due to water's surface tension.
> 
> Nope, you don't understand what a plasma is.

I do know.  The difference is that I am not a dogmatic fool.

Plasma is a concept.  It's a behavior.  An ionic plasma is hot.  A plasma that is a consequence of H bonds occurs at ambient temps.

You are just a simpleton with a computer and internet access.  You are not a genuine scienstists, go play with sergio.


> 
> > Plasma's are more common than people generally assume
> 
> In space, but not in the Earth's atmosphere.

prove it, dumbass.


> 
> > Alternative to Spiritualistic Thinking in the Atmospheric Sciences  
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dexlOvP7mPw
> > 
> > This is very advanced so don't try to takt it all in at one time.
> 
> It is nonsense.

Go take a flying leap

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558625 — 23 zeroes in base_ten?

I only got as far as scripting to use a b.b.s, slthough
porgramming is a neat conceptualityl;
the ratio of air to vapor is. like, Avacado's numberS

> Plasma is a concept.  It's a behavior.  An ionic plasma is hot.  A plasma that is a consequence of H bonds occurs at ambient temps.
> 
> You are just a simpleton with a computer and internet access.  You are not a genuine scienstists, go play with sergio.

> or, iff I take a leap of

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558629

On 3/2/2016 12:10 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 10:01:06 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
>>> Actually, he's right.  Our atmosphere is a slight plasma.  And when water
>>> is mixed in it becomes even stronger, due to water's surface tension.
>>
>> Nope, you don't understand what a plasma is.
>
> I do know.  The difference is that I am not a dogmatic fool.
>
> Plasma is a concept.

no, it is a state of matter.

> It's a behavior.

no, it is a state of matter.


An ionic plasma is hot.  A plasma that is a consequence of H bonds 
occurs at ambient temps.

no, Plasma (from Greek πλάσμα, "anything formed"[1]) is one of the four 
fundamental states of matter, the others being solid, liquid, and gas. A 
plasma has properties unlike those of the other states.

A plasma can be created by heating a gas and is accompanied by the 
dissociation of molecular bonds, if present.



>
> You are just a simpleton with a computer and internet access.


why are you so angry ?

just because you can't sell your new age fictional physics here ?

airy-fairy ideas like yours are not supported by any branch of science.



>
>
>>
>>> Plasma's are more common than people generally assume
>>
>> In space, but not in the Earth's atmosphere.
>
> prove it, dumbass.
>

another of your airy-fairy new age  la-de-da  self-ideas, your 
imagination leaking out.

>
>>
>>> Alternative to Spiritualistic Thinking in the Atmospheric Sciences
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dexlOvP7mPw
>>>
>>> This is very advanced so don't try to takt it all in at one time.
>>
>> It is nonsense.
>
> Go take a flying leap
>

you already did with the title to that vid, you should write another 
book on how you did the videos,

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558632

On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 10:50:21 AM UTC-8, Sergio wrote:

> > I do know.  The difference is that I am not a dogmatic fool.
> >
> > Plasma is a concept.
> 
> no, it is a state of matter.

Yeah, so?

> 
> > It's a behavior.
> 
> no, it is a state of matter.

Same difference, you dogmatic fool.

> 
> 
> An ionic plasma is hot.  A plasma that is a consequence of H bonds 
> occurs at ambient temps.
> 
> no, Plasma (from Greek πλάσμα, "anything formed"[1]) is one of the four 
> fundamental states of matter, the others being solid, liquid, and gas. A 
> plasma has properties unlike those of the other states.

Okay, not present your argument, you simpleton.  

> A plasma can be created by heating a gas and is accompanied by the 
> dissociation of molecular bonds, if present.

That's one kind of plasma.  

Try not to be a dogmatic fool.  Any idiot can look up definitions on wikipedia.  

Duhhhr!!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558638

On 3/2/2016 1:02 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 10:50:21 AM UTC-8, Sergio wrote:
>
>>> I do know.  The difference is that I am not a dogmatic fool.
>>>
>>> Plasma is a concept.
>>
>> no, it is a state of matter.
>
> Yeah, so?

are you plasma ?

>
>>
>>> It's a behavior.
>>
>> no, it is a state of matter.
>
> Same difference, you dogmatic fool.

so in your mind, concepts are behaviors.


>
>>
>>
>> An ionic plasma is hot.  A plasma that is a consequence of H bonds
>> occurs at ambient temps.
>>
>> no, Plasma (from Greek πλάσμα, "anything formed"[1]) is one of the four
>> fundamental states of matter, the others being solid, liquid, and gas. A
>> plasma has properties unlike those of the other states.
>
> Okay, not present your argument, you simpleton.

simpler if you wiki it, or go to the libarary.  That way you can be 
learned it yourself.



>
>> A plasma can be created by heating a gas and is accompanied by the
>> dissociation of molecular bonds, if present.
>
> That's one kind of plasma.

it is the definition of plasma.

Your definition is the airy-fairy new age magical mystery substance that 
gets water up to the clouds somehow without ever being a GAS, GAG !


>
> Try not to be a dogmatic fool.  Any idiot can look up definitions on wikipedia.
>
> Duhhhr!!!!
>

you should do a video of just you doing " Duhhhr!!!! "
it would be a gas.
the soundtrack could be a ringtone

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558645

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 10:50:21 AM UTC-8, Sergio wrote:
> 
>> > I do know.  The difference is that I am not a dogmatic fool.
>> >
>> > Plasma is a concept.
>> 
>> no, it is a state of matter.
> 
> Yeah, so?
> 
>> 
>> > It's a behavior.
>> 
>> no, it is a state of matter.
> 
> Same difference, you dogmatic fool.

Nope; clueless, and delusional.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558655

On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 11:31:06 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

> > Same difference, you dogmatic fool.
> 
> Nope; clueless, and delusional.

You simpletons haven't an argument.  Go play with sergio.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558663

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 11:31:06 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>> > Same difference, you dogmatic fool.
>> 
>> Nope; clueless, and delusional.
> 
> You simpletons haven't an argument.  Go play with sergio.

Science is not arguments.

Science is repeatible experiments.

Seek help from a mental health professional.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558669

On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 12:16:05 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 11:31:06 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > 
> >> > Same difference, you dogmatic fool.
> >> 
> >> Nope; clueless, and delusional.
> > 
> > You simpletons haven't an argument.  Go play with sergio.
> 
> Science is not arguments.
> 
> Science is repeatible experiments.

You have neither.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558725

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 12:16:05 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 11:31:06 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> > 
>> >> > Same difference, you dogmatic fool.
>> >> 
>> >> Nope; clueless, and delusional.
>> > 
>> > You simpletons haven't an argument.  Go play with sergio.
>> 
>> Science is not arguments.
>> 
>> Science is repeatible experiments.
> 
> You have neither.
 
Classic denial of reality by the delusional.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558726

On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 3:46:18 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

> Classic denial of reality by the delusional.

It's not necessary to deny what has never been presented.

Do you have any proof that clear air contains gaseous H2O?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558736

Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 3:46:18 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>> Classic denial of reality by the delusional.
> 
> It's not necessary to deny what has never been presented.

Classic denial of reality by the delusional.
 
> Do you have any proof that clear air contains gaseous H2O?

You mean around the house?

Other than every phisics and chemistry book, no.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558741

On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 4:16:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 3:46:18 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > 
> >> Classic denial of reality by the delusional.
> > 
> > It's not necessary to deny what has never been presented.
> 
> Classic denial of reality by the delusional.
>  
> > Do you have any proof that clear air contains gaseous H2O?
> 
> You mean around the house?
> 
> Other than every phisics and chemistry book, no.
> 
> -- 
> Jim Pennino

Excellent.  You are making progress, Jimbo. 

Isn't science fun!

James McGinn
Solving Tornadoes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#558754

Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 4:16:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 3:46:18 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> > 
>> >> Classic denial of reality by the delusional.
>> > 
>> > It's not necessary to deny what has never been presented.
>> 
>> Classic denial of reality by the delusional.
>>  
>> > Do you have any proof that clear air contains gaseous H2O?
>> 
>> You mean around the house?
>> 
>> Other than every phisics and chemistry book, no.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> Excellent.  You are making progress, Jimbo. 

In your delusional state you probably think that response is clever
and not stupendously insane.

> Isn't science fun!

How would you know?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web