Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #517194 > unrolled thread

911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 09:09 -0500
    Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 10:33 -0500
      Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-27 17:28 -0400
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:34 -0500
          Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:54 +0000
          Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 18:48 -0500
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-28 00:37 -0400
              Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:00 -0500
                Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:40 -0500
                  Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:02 -0500
                    Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:01 -0500
                Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-28 21:12 -0400
              Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 16:09 -0500
          Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-28 00:45 -0400
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:08 -0500
          Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:06 +0100
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 00:32 -0400
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (list of seven) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 07:19 -0500
              Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (list of seven) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 16:19 +0100
                Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (list of seven) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:04 -0500
                  Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (list of seven) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 17:37 -0700
    Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:10 +0000
      Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:20 -0500
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:35 +0000
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 19:50 -0500
        asbestos isn't good to breathe, when noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 12:23 -0700
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:05 +0100
      Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-27 17:31 -0400
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:56 +0000
          Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 17:09 -0500
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 23:07 +0000
              Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (media edits audio to help with the hoax) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:51 -0500
                Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (media edits audio to help with the hoax) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:29 +0000
                  Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (media edits audio to help with the hoax) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:57 -0500
                    Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (media edits audio to help with the hoax) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 17:41 +0000
                      Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (media edits audio to help with the hoax) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 13:00 -0500
                        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (media edits audio to help with the hoax) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 18:23 +0000
                        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 19:32 +0100
                Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 19:32 +0100
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 19:46 -0500
    Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:04 -0500
      Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 10:24 -0500
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 10:23 -0700
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:13 +0000
          Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:30 -0500
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:32 +0000
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:55 -0500
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:40 -0500
          Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:34 -0500
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:34 +0000
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:55 -0500
    Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 10:36 -0500
      Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:31 -0500
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 11:38 -0500
          Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:24 -0500
      Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:45 -0400

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

#517356

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:09:44 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>
>Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the 
>media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.

     Where to begin. 
     I'll try to dumb this down to a level you'll be able to
understand. I've not enjoyed any success in reaching down to your
level in the past, but I'm ever the optimist.
     A four engine turboprop won't reach the same speed as a jet
airliner. As such, there would never be the same inertia.
     The plane had just taken off, so it would not have been at max
speed. This further decreased the inertia present.
     I understand you have a learning disability, but it can't be as
severe as you're presenting. You're acting, right?
     Speak to a mental health care professional about your OBSESSION
with alt.astronomy. Outside of your well documented delusions,
astronomy had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517422

"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:jncvtapimb8di87644q9to9qidu5gskuil@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:09:44 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>>
>>Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the
>>media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>
>     Where to begin.

That is simple by finding out what the thickness was for the steel that the 
CGIs flew right through without slowing down.

I've seen quite a few places that talk about the thickness of the main 
support columns but not many say what the perimeter walls were probably 
because if that data were readily available it would help prove someone flew 
two CGIs into the Twin Towers.  DUH.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517447

Rocky wrote:
> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:jncvtapimb8di87644q9to9qidu5gskuil@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:09:44 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>>> 
>>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known
>>> the media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>> 
>>     Where to begin.
> 
> That is simple by finding out what the thickness was for the steel
> that the CGIs flew right through without slowing down.
> 
> I've seen quite a few places that talk about the thickness of the main
> support columns but not many say what the perimeter walls were
> probably because if that data were readily available it would help
> prove someone flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.  DUH.
> 
> Rocky

what does it matter now

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517471

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> I've seen quite a few places that talk about the thickness of the main 
> support columns but not many say what the perimeter walls were probably 
> because if that data were readily available it would help prove someone flew 
> two CGIs into the Twin Towers.  DUH.

The perimeter walls were like most such tall buildings, mostly glass,
you raving lunatic.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517637

<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
news:nuk6bc-427.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> I've seen quite a few places that talk about the thickness of the main
>> support columns but not many say what the perimeter walls were probably
>> because if that data were readily available it would help prove someone 
>> flew
>> two CGIs into the Twin Towers.  DUH.
>
> The perimeter walls were like most such tall buildings, mostly glass,
> you raving lunatic.

Then what held both ends of the trusses up you idiot?

Don't forget the trusses went from the core columns to the perimeter walls 
and they clearly were not built to only be supported by the internal support 
columns.

You really need to watch those videos that prove NIST was full of bullshit 
because they do a great job at showing that Towers were a lot stronger than 
the media wants you to believe now.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517653

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
> news:nuk6bc-427.ln1@mail.specsol.com...

>> The perimeter walls were like most such tall buildings, mostly glass,
>> you raving lunatic.
> 
> Then what held both ends of the trusses up you idiot?

Not very much, you bat shit crazy, delusional, parnoid, kook.

<snip remaining babbling kook drool>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517721

On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 10:30:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
>news:nuk6bc-427.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I've seen quite a few places that talk about the thickness of the main
>>> support columns but not many say what the perimeter walls were probably
>>> because if that data were readily available it would help prove someone 
>>> flew
>>> two CGIs into the Twin Towers.  DUH.
>>
>> The perimeter walls were like most such tall buildings, mostly glass,
>> you raving lunatic.
>
>Then what held both ends of the trusses up you idiot?
>

     FNVW has already explained this in great detail. You did read his
posts on the matter, right? Or did he use big words that made your
head hurt?

>Don't forget the trusses went from the core columns to the perimeter walls 
>and they clearly were not built to only be supported by the internal support 
>columns.
>
>You really need to watch those videos that prove NIST was full of bullshit 
>because they do a great job at showing that Towers were a lot stronger than 
>the media wants you to believe now.  <G>

     They show the towers collapsed due to the damage sustained by the
impact of the planes and the fires. 

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517540

On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:24:22 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:


Context restored at no additional cost.


>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:jncvtapimb8di87644q9to9qidu5gskuil@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:09:44 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>>>
>>>Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the
>>>media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>>
>>     Where to begin. 
>>     I'll try to dumb this down to a level you'll be able to
>>understand. I've not enjoyed any success in reaching down to your
>>level in the past, but I'm ever the optimist.
>>     A four engine turboprop won't reach the same speed as a jet
>>airliner. As such, there would never be the same inertia.
>>     The plane had just taken off, so it would not have been at max
>>speed. This further decreased the inertia present.
>>     I understand you have a learning disability, but it can't be as
>>severe as you're presenting. You're acting, right?


Rocky?


>>     Speak to a mental health care professional about your OBSESSION
>>with alt.astronomy. Outside of your well documented delusions,
>>astronomy had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks.
>
>That is simple by finding out what the thickness was for the steel that the 
>CGIs flew right through without slowing down.
>

     That makes no sense.

>I've seen quite a few places that talk about the thickness of the main 
>support columns but not many say what the perimeter walls were probably 
>because if that data were readily available it would help prove someone flew 
>two CGIs into the Twin Towers.  DUH.

     What does that have to do with my post? 
     Are you truly so DESPERATE to divert attention from the truth?
Serious question.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517638

"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:s8s1uahkecs0bsdv5cde6q2kqg44dt06fa@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:24:22 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>
> Context restored at no additional cost.

You spelled commode wrong you idiot.  And I flushed the shit you placed in 
this post again.

The facts remain, the trusses had to be supported on both sides and your 
story makes it sound like they were not.  Boy you lie as bad as NIST and too 
bad they were caught in the act.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517654

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> The facts remain, the trusses had to be supported on both sides and your 
> story makes it sound like they were not.  Boy you lie as bad as NIST and too 
> bad they were caught in the act.  <G>

The trusses were supported at both ends by what amounted to a column and
the majority of the outer walls were glass, you batshit crazy, delusional
paranoid, kook.

<snip remaining kook babble>



-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517723

On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 10:34:20 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:s8s1uahkecs0bsdv5cde6q2kqg44dt06fa@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:24:22 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Context restored at no additional cost.
>
>You spelled commode wrong you idiot. 

     Context restored at no additional commode?
     You truly are mentally ill.

> And I flushed the shit you placed in 
>this post again.
>

     Your admission that you can't counter the truth I posted is noted
and accepted.

>The facts remain, the trusses had to be supported on both sides and your 

     They were supported at both ends. I've not claimed otherwise.

>story makes it sound like they were not.  

     Please cease lying.

>Boy you lie as bad as NIST and too 
>bad they were caught in the act.  <G>

     Since they've not lied, your LIE that they did fails.
     Would you like to try a different lie?
     How's that whole ignoring my posts thing working out for you?

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522009

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message 
news:LPmdnWLhW_nMh0LInZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com...
> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>
> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the 
> media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.

BTW I forgot to state that a tinfoil airplane going 300 mph won't do much 
more damage to steel and concrete than a tinfoil airplane going 600 mph but 
there will not be any tinfoil airplanes going 600 mph near sea level because 
a tin foil jet would fly apart before they could hit anything.  DUH.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522025

On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 10:36:19 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message 
>news:LPmdnWLhW_nMh0LInZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com...
>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>>
>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the 
>> media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>
>BTW I forgot to state that a tinfoil airplane going 300 mph won't do much 
>more damage to steel and concrete than a tinfoil airplane going 600 mph but 
>there will not be any tinfoil airplanes going 600 mph near sea level because 
>a tin foil jet would fly apart before they could hit anything.  DUH.

     Such a plane would undoubtedly fail to continue flying at any
altitude. But then, no one makes planes out of foil.

"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522226

"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:se3rvad4ouc1f5ash09n504m3a79qctetj@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 10:36:19 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message
>>news:LPmdnWLhW_nMh0LInZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>>>
>>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the
>>> media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>>
>>BTW I forgot to state that a tinfoil airplane going 300 mph won't do much
>>more damage to steel and concrete than a tinfoil airplane going 600 mph 
>>but
>>there will not be any tinfoil airplanes going 600 mph near sea level 
>>because
>>a tin foil jet would fly apart before they could hit anything.  DUH.
>
>     Such a plane would undoubtedly fail to continue flying at any
> altitude. But then, no one makes planes out of foil.

ROTFLMAO because 9/11 proves that hijacked jets are made out of CGIs.  BTW 
don't forget the CGI in the following was created by the same software that 
created most of the other CGIs in Nuke York City.  That software just didn't 
have that crane in it's database.

Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4
( Time indexed to start at 25:58 )
 https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s

> Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

I've told you before Kidiot that if you want to post a message ID you also 
have to add "news:" right to the front of the actual ID just like I did in 
the very first line of this post.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522373

On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 11:38:24 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:se3rvad4ouc1f5ash09n504m3a79qctetj@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 10:36:19 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message
>>>news:LPmdnWLhW_nMh0LInZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>>>>
>>>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the
>>>> media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>>>
>>>BTW I forgot to state that a tinfoil airplane going 300 mph won't do much
>>>more damage to steel and concrete than a tinfoil airplane going 600 mph 
>>>but
>>>there will not be any tinfoil airplanes going 600 mph near sea level 
>>>because a tin foil jet would fly apart before they could hit anything.  DUH.
>>
>>     Such a plane would undoubtedly fail to continue flying at any
>> altitude. But then, no one makes planes out of foil.
>
>ROTFLMAO because 9/11 proves that hijacked jets are made out of CGIs.  

     You've helped to prove they were not.
     What does your LIE about CGIs have to do with your LIE about foil
planes? I honestly don't see the connection.

>BTW 
>don't forget the CGI in the following was created by the same software that 
>created most of the other CGIs in Nuke York City.  That software just didn't 
>have that crane in it's database.

     You mean the one where someone doctored the video to make it
appear as if the plane flew in front of the cables, but failed to
doctor it so that it appeared to fly in front of the rigging?
     Whoever doctored the video did a poor job. Not to imply I could
have done any better. But I would have realized the error before
sending it out. I would have then asked someone more competent in
image manipulation to correct my mistakes.
     But the person who doctored the video counted on mentally
unstable people, like yourself, to not actually examine the video
close enough to see that it's not genuine.
     How does this connect to your LIE about foil planes? I can't see
a connection. You'll need to point it out.

>
>Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4
>( Time indexed to start at 25:58 )
> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s
>

     You can post a link to a video you KNOW is invalid as often as
your mental defects demand. It will not suddenly become true and valid
as a result. But keep trying, if you must.

>>"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
>>belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
>>
>>Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
>>on 9/11/01 in
>> Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
>
>I've told you before Kidiot 

     That's not my first name either.
     To make it a bit easier for you, I was born and raised in Krakow,
Poland. I realize my Welsh last name does not reveal this. As such,
your not starting with Polish names is understandable.
     Try Polish names that start with K. You're far more likely to
stumble on the correct one that way. Unless, of course, my parents
thought a Latino sounding name would be really, really funny.

>that if you want to post a message ID you also 
>have to add "news:" right to the front of the actual ID just like I did in 
>the very first line of this post.

     I have posted MIDs in the proper format for well over 10 years.
You're the only person to claim to have a problem with the proper
formatting. This more than suggests the problem lies with you.
     I suggest you cease using OE and get a real news reader. 


"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."

Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522034

On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 10:36:19 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>BTW I forgot to state that a tinfoil airplane 


Stop making tinfoil airplanes and put the foil to better use lining
your hats and caps.  

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web